Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Discoidin domain receptor 2 activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase as an important pathway for osteonectin-regulating osteoblast mineralization

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 16, Article number: 711 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

The present study aimed to determine the role of the discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) in the osteonectin (ON) regulation of osteoblast mineralization through the activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK).

Methods

Four groups were established: the ON group, the inhibitor group, the Ddr2-small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) group, and the control group. Osteoblasts from the parietal bones of neonatal Sprague–Dawley rats were isolated and cultured. In the ON group, 1 µg/mL ON was added to the osteoblasts. The gene expressions of collagen 1 (Col 1) and Ddr2 were detected using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). In the inhibitor group, the osteoblasts were added to WRG-28 (a specific DDR2 inhibitor), and in the Ddr2-siRNA group, the osteoblasts were transfected with Ddr2-siRNA. The gene and protein expressions of DDR2, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin, osteopontin, and p38 MAPK were determined using RT-qPCR and western blot analysis. Alizarin red staining and transmission electron microscopy were used to detect mineralization.

Results

The results showed that ON enhanced the osteoblast Col 1 and Ddr2 gene expressions, while the use of a Ddr2-siRNA/DDR2-blocker decreased the OPN, BSP, OCN, and P38 gene and protein expressions and reduced osteoblast cellular activity and mineralized nodules.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that DDR2 activation of p38 MAPK is an important approach to ON-regulating osteoblast mineralization.

Introduction

Osteonectin (ON) is an important non-collagenous protein, also known as SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) or BM‐40, and it has a high affinity for binding with collagen and hydroxylapatite [1]; ON also participates in the overall osteoblast mineralization process [2] and plays an important role as a type of functional regulatory protein in the function of osteoblasts and the synthesis of collagen and extracellular matrices [3,4,5,6,7]. An important signaling pathway, regarded as a signal regulatory hub in bone repair and reconstruction, is p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [8,9,10,11]. Previous studies of Zhu et al. verify the importance of P38 for ON regulation in osteoblast mineralization [12]. Although P38 pathway activation using ON has been fully proven as a potential mechanism in various other cellular physiological and pathological processes [13,14,15], this signal event was first reported in osteoblast mineralization; however, its specific mechanism remains unclear.

Domain receptors (DDRs) on cell surfaces are widely expressed tyrosine kinase receptors; they can be slowly and continuously activated by triple-helix collagen [16]. Triple-helix collagen peptides contain crystalline structures of discoid protein domains, which can lead to structural changes and direct phosphorylation of DDR2. [17]. Existing studies have comprehensively demonstrated that ON regulates the growth and deposition of collagen fibers and can stimulate collagen conformational changes [2]. In addition, the fact that DDR2 and ON share the same collagen recognition pattern and combine the same GVMGFO motif suggests a correlation between the two [18, 19]. Their association has also been illustrated in experimental studies, where DDR2 phosphorylation promoted fibroblast responses to tissue regeneration and healing, while DDR2 deletion seriously delayed wound healing; accordingly, ON expression was isotropically reduced [20].

The DDR2 tyrosine kinase domain is considered a key signal transmission site for P38 activation in many cell activities. The DDR-initiated downstream p38 MAPK pathway is the major mechanism for matrix metalloproteinase regulation [21]. Many transforming growth factors can adjust the release of calcified extracellular vesicles and affect collagen deposition in vascular smooth muscle cells through the activation of p38 MAPK via DDRs [22, 23]. DDR2 is also considered to be a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation, and its stimulation of p38 MAPK is a necessary condition for DDR2-induced activation of RUNX2 and OCN promoters [24]. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether DDR2 is also an important pathway for ON activation of P38 in the regulation of osteoblast mineralization.

Materials and methods

Primary osteoblast isolation, culturing, and purification

As previously described, osteoblasts were isolated from the parietal bones of neonatal (aged < 48 h) Sprague–Dawley rats through sequential collagenase [25]. The released cells were collected by centrifugation (1000 rpm for 10 min), washed with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) (GNM-20012, China) twice, suspended in an α‐minimum essential medium (α‐MEM) (4150034, Gibco), seeded at a density of 5 × 105 cm−2, and incubated at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. When the cells reached a confluence of approximately 80–90%, they were purified using a different attachment method with the aim to remove the mixture of fibroblasts and endothelial cells, both of which were relatively rapid adherents, so that most of the two cell types remained in the previous dish for purification after a transfer every 10 min. Following the identification with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and alizarin red staining (ARS), the osteoblasts were cultured for subsequent experiments.

Ddr2-siRNA construction and transfection

The following small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) sequences were used: 5′-AACCTGATGACCTGAA GGAGT-3′ (NM_006182, base pairs 621–641). The cells (osteoblasts) were cultured in T150 (Corning) culture flasks in a Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 (R7509-1L, SIGMA) medium and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (A31608-02, Gibco) without antibiotics until a confluence of 80% was reached. The cells were rinsed twice with PBS, and siRNA and 5% CO2 were added for 5 h at 37 °C. It was then replaced with a fresh RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS, and the cells were further incubated for 72 h before being used in specific experiments. The following items were prepared for siRNA transfection: (1) tube 1: 61 µL of siRNA + 2.2 mL of RPMI 1640; and (2) tube 2: 90 µL of Lipofectamine 2000 (Lipo 2000, no. 11668019; Invitrogen Company) + 2.16 mL of RPMI 1640. The tubes were incubated for 5 min at room temperature, then combined and further incubated for 20 min. Next, 13.5 mL of RPMI 1640 medium was added; the siRNA mix was then applied to the cells. The transfection efficiency was assessed using a fluorescence microscope.

Cell grouping and induced mineralization

The second-generation osteoblasts were re-inoculated in a six‐well plate at a density of 2 × 105 cells/mL; they were then cultured in α‐MEM with 10% FBS. After mixing the cells, the original medium was aspirated, and the cells were randomly assigned to different groups and studied in three stages.

Stage one

In the control group, the osteoblasts were added to a mineralized solution containing 50 mg/L ascorbic acid, 10 mmol/L sodium glycerophosphate, and a 100 mL/L FBS α‐MEM culture solution. In the ON group, the osteoblasts were added to a mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL ON (Sino Biological 8087-R08H). The medium was substituted every 2 days in both groups. On day 5, the Col1 a1, Col1 a2, and Ddr2 gene expressions were detected using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) (according to the previous study [12]). The experiments were conducted in triplicates.

Stage two

In the control group, the osteoblasts were added to the mineralized solution; in the ON group, the osteoblasts were added to a mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL ON; and in the inhibitor group, the osteoblasts were added to a mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL ON + 230 nM WRG-28 (a DDR2-specific inhibitor, CAS No. 1913291-02-7, ChemeGen) [26]. The medium was substituted every 2 days in each group. On day 5, the non-collagen protein (OPN, BSP, OCN), Ddr2, and P38 gene expressions were detected using RT-qPCR. The experiments were conducted in triplicates.

Stage three

In the control group, the osteoblasts were added to a mineralized solution; in the ON group, the osteoblasts were added to a mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL ON; in the inhibitor group, the osteoblasts were added to a mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL ON + 230 nM WRG-28; and in the DDR2-siRNA group, the osteoblasts were transfected with DDR2-siRNA and added to a mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL ON. The medium was substituted every 2 days in each group. On day 5, the DDR2, p38, OPN, BSP, and OCN gene and protein expressions were determined using RT-qPCR and western blot. The experiments were conducted in triplicates. The mineralized nodules were stained using ARS, and the cell ultrastructure was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (HITACHI HT7700).

RT-qPCR

Cells were collected from each group, and the total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted using a Trizol reagent (no. 15596026; Ambion Company) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols. Next, 2 µg of total RNA was used for reverse transcription, and an RT‐PCR was performed using an RT‐PCR kit (no. RR037A; Takara Company) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The Col1 a1, Col1 a 2, Ddr2, P38, Opn, Bsp, and Ocn gene expression levels were analyzed using the Light Cycler® 96 real‐time PCR system (Roche), with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal control gene. The primer sequences are listed in Table 1. All real‐time PCRs were performed in triplicate, and the results after calibration with GAPDH expression were calculated using the ΔΔCT method; they are presented in fold increase and relative to the control.

Table 1 Primer sequences for RT‐qPCR
Full size table

Western blot analysis

The proteins extracted from osteoblasts were quantified using a bicinchoninic acid assay protein assay kit (Beyotime) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The cells cultured in the six-well plate were washed with PBS three times, and an appropriate amount of RIPA lysate (Beyotime) was added to phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (Amersco-0754-100G) within a few minutes before use (the sinal PMSF concentration was 1 mM). Then, 200 µL of pyrolysate was added to each hole and mixed well; after full decomposition and 10,000 × g centrifuging for 5 min, the supernatant was taken. A suitable amount of BCA working fluid (P0011, Beyotime) was prepared by adding 50 volumes of BCA reagent A and 1 volume of BCA reagent B (50:1), the appropriate volume of the sample was added to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and supplemented with a 0.9% NaCL solution to 100 µL. Next, 1 mL of BCA working fluid was added to each hole and left at 37 °C for 30 min; the A562 absorption value was then determined and the protein concentration calculated according to the standard curve. The protein of each group was loaded on sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in Tris‐buffered saline with Tween 20 at room temperature for 1 h. They were then supplemented with the primary antibody (1:1000) and incubated at 4 ℃ for 12 h. The membranes were then incubated with a secondary antibody (1:2000) at room temperature for 2 h. Protein bands were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Millipore), the gel grayscales were captured using the ImageJ (V1.8.0) software, and the relative expression quantity was calculated using the grayscale-to-GAPDH ratio.

Alkaline phosphatase staining

The original culture medium was removed, and the cells were washed twice using PBS and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 h. They were then washed three to five times with PBS and stained with an ALP solution (BCIP-NBT, C3206, Beyotime) in the dark for 30 min. Following ALP removal, the cells were washed in distilled water two to three times and observed under a microscope.

ARS

A volume of 1% alizarin red aqueous solution was obtained by dissolving 1 g of alizarin red powder (A5533, Sigma) in 100 mL of distilled water. Impurities were filtered, the PH adjusted to 4.2 with 10% ammonia, and the solution stored at 4 °C for later use. After a two-week mineralized solution induction, the osteoblasts were washed with PBS and fixed with 95% ethanol for 30 min. After drying, the prepared ARS solution was added for 15 min; the osteoblasts were then rinsed three times with distilled water, dewatered, sealed, and observed and photographed under a light microscope (Olympus) for calcification detection. Adobe Photoshop CS5 was used for image analysis to calculate the image-field percentage of positive calcium nodule staining. The procedure was as follows: (1) the image was opened in Adobe Photoshop CS5 and the layer background copied; (2) a new solid color fill or adjustment layer was created and a bright green background chosen; (3) “blending options” in the first layer were selected and the filter range of each color in the blending ribbon adjusted. R, 120–255, G, 0–112 and B, 0–112 were selected for this analysis; (4) layer 1 was converted to a smart object, the histogram palette opened, and “expanded view” selected; and (5) the positive stain percentage of the calcium nodule was calculated by the number of pixels in the full image and the number of pixels in the layer.

Cell ultrastructure observation

The osteoblasts were washed with PBS two times, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde, phosphoric acid buffer, and 1% osmium acid solution, respectively, rinsed with 0.1 M phosphoric acid rinsing solution, and dehydrated at 4 °C with ethanol and acetone in a refrigerator. After embedding with pure acetone and an embedding solution, the samples were cured in an oven, sliced to 50–60 nm by ultrathin sectioning machine, and stained with 3% uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The cell ultrastructure was observed using a TEM (HITACHI HT7700).

Statistical analysis

All data were tested for normality and homogeneity of variance; the measurement data were presented with the mean ± standard deviation (SD). A one‐way analysis of variance was conducted for the comparison among multiple groups, and tests on the least significant difference (Student–Newman–Keuls test or q test) were conducted for the comparison between two groups with homogeneity of variance; comparisons between two groups without homogeneity of variance were highlighted using Tamhane’s T2 test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS (17.0) software.

Results

ON enhancement of osteoblast Col1 and Ddr2 gene expressions

In the first stage of the experiment, the osteoblasts were divided into two groups: the ON group and the control group. On day 5, RT‐qPCR was conducted to measure the mRNA expressions of Col1 a1, Col1 a2, and Ddr2.

The results showed that the Col1 a1, Col1 a2, and Ddr2 expressions were significantly increased in the ON group compared with the control group (Col1 a1, P < 0.001; Col1 a2, P < 0.01; and Ddr2, P < 0.01) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Osteonectin enhanced the gene expressions of COL1 and DDR2. The mRNA expressions of COL1a1, COL1a2 and DDR2 were quantified by RT-qPCR; **P < .01, ***P < .001 versus the CON group; the experiments were conducted in triplicates; data were expressed by means ± standard deviation (SD). COL1: collagen 1; DDR2: discoidin domain receptor 2; RT-qPCR: reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; CON group: control group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution; ON group: osteonectin group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin

Full size image

DDR2-blocker decrease in Opn, Bsp, Ocn, and P38 gene expressions

In the second stage of the experiment, the inhibitor group was set up and the gene expressions of non-collagen proteins (OPN, BSP, OCN), DDR2, and P38 were detected using RT-qPCR.

The Opn, Bsp, Ocn, and P38 gene expressions were significantly decreased in the inhibitor group compared with the ON group (Opn, P < 0.05; Bsp, P < 0.01; Ocn, P < 0.05; and p38, P < 0.05); there was no statistical difference in DDR2 gene expression between the two groups (P > 0.05). The Opn, Bsp, Ocn, and P38 gene expressions were still increased in the inhibitor group compared with the control group; the differences were all statistically significant (Opn, P < 0.01; Bsp, P < 0.05; Ocn, P < 0.01; and P38, P < 0.05) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

DDR2-blocker decreased the gene expressions of OPN, BSP, OCN and P38. the mRNA expressions of OPN, BSP, OCN, DDR2 and P38 were quantified by RT-qPCR; *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001 versus the CON group; NS P > .05, #P < .05, ##P < .01 versus the ON group; the experiments were conducted in triplicates; data were expressed by means ± standard deviation (SD). OPN, osteopontin; BSP, bone sialoprotein; OCN, osteocalcin; P38: p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase; DDR2: discoidin domain receptor 2; RT-qPCR: reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; CON group: control group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution; ON group: osteonectin group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin; inhibitor group: the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin + 230 nM WRG-28

Full size image

DDR2-siRNA/DDR2-blocker down-regulation of positive ON regulatory effect on osteoblasts

In the third stage of the experiment, Ddr2-siRNA was constructed to suppress DDR2 expression in osteoblasts. The DDR2, p38, OPN, BSP, and OCN gene and protein expressions were determined using RT-qPCR and western blot. The mineralized nodules were stained using ARS, and the cell ultrastructure was observed via TEM.

The DDR2 and phosphorylated DDR2 (P-DDR2) gene and protein expressions in the DDR2-siRNA group were observably decreased compared with the ON group (mRNA: Ddr2, P < 0.001; protein: DDR2, P < 0.01; and P-DDR2, P < 0.001). The P-DDR2 protein expression in the inhibitor group was also significantly decreased (P < 0.001); however, no obvious differences were observed in DDR2 gene and protein expressions between the ON group and the inhibitor group (P > 0.05). Correspondingly, the OPN, BSP, OCN, and p38 gene and protein expressions in the inhibitor group and the DDR2-siRNA group were both observably decreased compared with the ON group (P < 0.05 in all); however, the expressions were still significantly increased compared with the control group (P < 0.05 in all) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

DDR2-siRNA/DDR2-blocker downregulated the gene and protein expressions of OPN, BSP, OCN and P38. A the mRNA expressions of OPN, BSP, OCN, DDR2 and P38 quantified by RT-qPCR in response to the treatment of CON, ON, Inhibitor, and DDR2-siRNA group; B the gray value of protein bands and protein levels of OPN, BSP, OCN, DDR2, P-DDR2, P38 and P-P38 quantified by western blot analysis in response to the treatment of CON, ON, Inhibitor, and DDR2-siRNA group; NS P > .05, *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001 versus the Con group; #P < .05, ##P < .01, ###P < .001 versus the ON group; the experiments were conducted in triplicates; data were expressed by means ±  standard deviation (SD). OPN, osteopontin; BSP, bone sialoprotein; OCN, osteocalcin; P38: p38 mitogen‐activated protein kinase; P-P38: phosphorylated p38; DDR2: discoidin domain receptor 2; P-DDR2: phosphorylated DDR2; RT‐qPCR: reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction; CON group: control group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution; ON group: osteonectin group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin; Inhibitor group: the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin + 230 nM WRG-28; DDR2-siRNA group: the osteoblasts were transfected with DDR2-siRNA and added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin

Full size image

The DDR2-siRNA/DDR2-blocker reduced the formation of mineralized nodules. Mineralized nodule areas in the DDR2-siRNA group and the inhibitor group were significantly smaller compared with the ON group but still larger than in the control group (P < 0.05 in all) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

DDR2-siRNA/DDR2-blocker reduced the formation of mineralized nodules. A Calcium nodules (blue circle) observation stained with alizarin red under a microscope (× 100) after induced mineralization for 14 days in response to the treatment of CON, ON, Inhibitor and DDR2-siRNA group; B the Adobe Photoshop CS5 system was used to calculate the positive staining of calcium nodules; C quantitative analysis of calcium nodules in each group. Bars, (a) 200 µm, *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001 versus the Con group; #P < .05 versus the ON group; three samples in each group were observed; data were expressed by means ± standard deviation (SD); CON group: control group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution; ON group: osteonectin group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin; Inhibitor group: the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin + 230 nM WRG-28; DDR2-siRNA group: the osteoblasts were transfected with DDR2-siRNA and added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin

Full size image

The Ddr2-siRNA/DDR2-blocker suppressed osteogenic activity in the osteoblasts. The osteoblasts in the Ddr2-siRNA group and the inhibitor group both exhibited low activity, and fewer organelles and vesicles were observed (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

DDR2-siRNA/DDR2-blocker suppressed the osteogenic activity. The cell ultrastructure of osteoblasts was observed by TEM in response to the treatment of CON, ON, Inhibitor, and DDR2-siRNA group; DDR2-siRNA/inhibitor group both showed fewer organelles and intracellular vesicles. Bars: a, c, e and g, 20 µm; Bars: b, d, f and h, 10 µm; N, nucleus; m, mitochondria; ly, lysosomes; mb, multivesicular bodies; iv, intracellular vesicle; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; CON group: control group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution; ON group: osteonectin group, the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin; Inhibitor group: the osteoblasts were added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin + 230 nM WRG-28; DDR2-siRNA group: the osteoblasts were transfected with DDR2-siRNA and added with mineralized solution + 1 µg/mL osteonectin

Full size image

Discussion

Various cytokines and signaling pathways are involved in osteoblast mineralization. The previous studies showed that ON had a significant positive role in the regulation of osteoblast mineralization through the p38 signaling pathway [12]; however, the exact mechanism of ON activation of p38 is still unknown. ON has a functional and structural basis for regulating a variety of cytokines and binding to various cell surface receptors. As a type of cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor, DDR2 is also actively associated with osteoblast differentiation, maturation, and mineralization. ON has the potential to affect DDR2 expression by regulating collagen synthesis and conformational changes (or in a variety of other ways). In this study, the Ddr2 expression was detected by adding ON to the osteoblasts; the P38 and mineralization indicator expressions were then investigated by blocking osteoblast DDR2 signaling pathways. The results indicated that DDR2 was an important pathway for ON activation of P38 in the regulation of osteoblast mineralization.

Based on the previous research, 1 µg/mL of ON was initially added to the osteoblasts [12]; the results showed that ON observably elevated Col1 and Ddr2 gene expressions. As the collagen chaperone, ON interacted with endoplasmic reticulum molecules to effectively transport non-mutated procollagen molecules out of the endoplasmic reticulum, thus further enhancing collagen synthesis [27]. Osteonectin can also affect collagen diameter and quantity by regulating transglutaminase activity [28]. The binding of ON to collagen and calcium ions is a critical step for the assembly of collagen fibers into bundles. It is suggested that the highly negatively charged molecular structure of ON can further promote collagen fiber assembly by binding to the highly positively charged collagen and calcium ion regions through electrostatic interaction [29]. Moreover, ON affects the processing, deposition, and degradation of procollagen by regulating integrins in order to improve the matrix assembly process [30]. Correspondingly, DDR2 is a collagen-binding receptor tyrosine kinase, and the GVMGFO collagen motif is believed to be the primary site for specific DDR2 recognition and binding; this combination causes a DDR structural change and subsequent phosphorylation and activation, which are extensively involved in cell development, extracellular matrix turnover, growth regulation, and cancer-related functions [31, 32]. Therefore, ON can influence the expression of DDR2 activation by regulating the growth and recombination of collagen; this is in line with the results of the present experiment.

To explore whether activated DDR2 can further activate the P38 signaling pathway, WRG-28 (a specific DDR2 inhibitor) was used to block the DDR2 signaling pathway in the second stage of the experiment. The results showed that the expressions of P38 and non-collagen genes were significantly decreased in the inhibitor group, indicating that DDR2 was an important receptor for p38-activated osteoblast mineralization. We also found that the WRG-28 did not significantly change the gene expressions of Ddr2, this finding accords with its specific inhibition of receptor-ligand interaction through the receptor allosteric regulation [26]. An association between DDR2 and P38 during bone development has also been fully proven. DDR2 is a vital mediator of interactions between cells and fibrillar collagens [33]; it also stimulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation signals through both ERK1/2 and p38 MAP kinase. These actions are highly related to changes in MAPK-dependent RUNX2 and PPARγ phosphorylation [24, 34]. Additionally, the positive role of P38 activation in the regulation of non-collagenous protein expression and osteoblast mineralization has also been confirmed in the previous studies [12]. In the third stage of the experiment, Ddr2-siRNA was constructed to transfect osteoblasts, and the mineralization indexes, including the protein determination of the mineralization index, ARS of mineralized nodules, and the ultrastructural observation of cells using TEM, were further determined. The results showed that the gene and protein expressions of DDR2 were decreased in siRNA group and the protein expression of P-DDR2 was decreased in inhibitor group; Ddr2-siRNA or DDR2 blockers also accordingly downregulated the expressions of non-collagen and P38 and decreased mineralization nodules; there were also fewer organelles and vesicles observed when compared with the ON group. The increase in osteoblast vesicles and organelles is an important sign of the enhancement of osteoblastic activity and mineralization ability. The disordered calcium phosphate in the vesicles is considered the precursor of carbonated hydroxyapatite, and mineral vesicles can initiate and directly participate in extracellular mineralization [35,36,37]. Mitochondria are involved in vesicle transport; amorphous calcium phosphate was found in mitochondria and new bone. There is also a strong point-to-point binding between mitochondria, intracellular calcium phosphate accumulation, and mineralization [38,39,40]. Combined, these results further clarified that both Ddr2-siRNA and DDR2 blockers could inhibit P38 activation and downregulate positive ON regulation of osteoblast mineralization.

In addition, P38 and mineralized gene expressions were still higher in both the inhibitor group and the Ddr2-siRNA group than in control group; the positive staining of calcium nodules areas were also larger. The presence of more than one activation pathway for P38 or other pathways by ON for regulating mineralization was considered. ON can activate P38 through several potential pathways, such as integrin [41, 42], matrix metalloproteinase [43,44,45], and transforming growth factor beta [46,47,48]. As ON is an extracellular matrix regulatory protein, its regulation of osteoblast mineralization is related to collagen synthesis regulation and the interaction between the extracellular matrix and osteoblasts. It was also found that the activity of osteoblasts was lower in the inhibitor group and the Ddr2-siRNA group than in other groups, indicating that DDR2 may be involved not only in mineralization but also in the entire process of osteoblast development and maturation. DDR2 is considered an important molecule for maintaining osteoblast activity and inhibiting bone marrow adipocyte formation [34]. Genetic evidence suggests that DDR2 plays a critical role in bone development. Furthermore, Ddr2 mutations can cause spondylo-meta-epiphyseal dysplasia with short limbs and abnormal calcifications (SMED-SL) [49, 50], and Ddr2 polymorphism is also strongly linked to a heightened fracture risk and lower bone mass measurements [51].

In summary, osteoblast mineralization is an extremely complex biological process, and several of its exact mechanisms still require clarification. Whether ON activates DDR2 via collagen alone or in other, more direct ways remains to be tested in future studies. Using the experiment conducted herein, it can be concluded that DDR2 is an important signaling pathway for ON activation of P38 in the regulation of osteoblast mineralization.

Availability of data and materials

We declared that materials described in the manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality.

References

  1. Termine JD, Kleinman HK, Whitson SW, Conn KM, McGarvey ML, Martin GR. Osteonectin, a bone-specific protein linking mineral to collagen. Cell. 1981;26:99–105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosset EM, Bradshaw AD. SPARC/osteonectin in mineralized tissue. Matrix Biol. 2016;52–54:78–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Funk SE, Sage EH. The Ca2+ binding glycoprotein SPARC modulates cell-cycle progression in bovine endothelial-cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:2648–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tremble PM, Lane TF, Sage EH, Werb Z. SPARC, a secreted protein associated with morphogenesis and tissue remodeling, induces expression of metalloproteinases in fibroblats through a novel extracellular matrix dependent pathway. J Cell Biol. 1993;121:1433–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang EN, Kang HJ, Koh KH, Rhee H, Kim NK, Kim HG. Frequent inactivation of SPARC by promoter hypermethylation in colon cancers. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:567–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kupprion C, Motamed K, Sage EH. SPARC (BM-40, osteonectin) inhibits the mitogenic effect of vascular endothelial growth factor on microvascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:29635–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nie J, Sage EH. SPARC inhibits adipogenesis by its enhancement of beta-catenin signaling. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:1279–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu L, Wang D, Qin Y, Xu M, Zhou L, Xu W, Liu X, Ye L, Yue S, Zheng Q, Li D. Astragalin promotes osteoblastic differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells and bone formation in vivo. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;16:228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sakai G, Tokuda H, Fujita K, Kainuma S, Kawabata T, Matsushima-Nishiwaki R, Kozawa O, Otsuka T. Heat shock protein 70 negatively regulates TGF-β-stimulated VEGF synthesis via p38 MAP kinase in osteoblasts. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;44:1133–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rey A, Manen D, Rizzoli R, Ferrari SL, Caverzasio J. Evidences for a role of p38 MAP kinase in the stimulation of alkaline phosphatase and matrix mineralization induced by parathyroid hormone in osteoblastic cells. Bone. 2007;41:59–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenblatt MB, Shim JH, Zou W, Sitara D, Schweitzer M, Hu D, Glimcher LH. The p38 MAPK pathway is essential for skeletogenesis and bone homeostasis in mice. J Clin Investig. 2010;120:2457–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhu YS, Gu Y, Jiang C, Chen L. Osteonectin regulates the extracellular matrix mineralization of osteoblasts through P38 signaling pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235:2220–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schultz CR, Golembieski WA, King DA, Brown SL, Brodie C, Rempel SA. Inhibition of HSP27 alone or in combination with pAKT inhibition as therapeutic approaches to target SPARC-induced glioma cell survival. Mol Cancer. 2012;5:11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma S, Xing F, Liu Y, Wu K, Said N, Pochampally R, Shiozawa Y, Lin HK, Balaji KC, Watabe K. Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) mediates metastatic dormancy of prostate cancer in bone. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:19351–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu J, Wang LY, Li CY, Wu JY, Zhang YT, Pang KP, Wei Y, Du LQ, Liu M, Wu XY. SPARC promotes self-renewal of limbal epithelial stem cells and ocular surface restoration through JNK and p38-MAPK signaling pathways. Stem Cells. 2020;38:134–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carafoli F, Hoheneste E. Collagen recognition and transmembrane signalling by discoidin domain receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1834:2187–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Orgel JPRO, Madhurapantula RS. A structural prospective for collagen receptors such as DDR and their binding of the collagen fibril. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res. 2019;1866:118478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Konitsiotis AD, Raynal N, Bihan D, Hohenester E, Farndale RW, Leitinger B. Characterization of high affinity binding motifs for the discoidin domain receptor DDR2 in collagen. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:6861–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hohenestera E, Sasakib T, Giudicib C, Farndale RW, Bächinger HP. Structural basis of sequence-specific collagen recognition by SPARC. PNAS. 2008;105:18273–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Olaso E, Lin HC, Wang LH, Friedman SL. Impaired dermal wound healing in discoidin domain receptor 2-deficient mice associated with defective extracellular matrix remodeling. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2011;4:5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Reel B, Korkmaz CG, Arun MZ, Yildirim G, Ogut D, Kaymak A, Micili SC, Ergur BU. The regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression and the role of discoidin domain receptor 1/2 signalling in zoledronate-treated PC3 cells. J Cancer. 2015;6:1020–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Krohn JB, Hutcheson JD, Martínez-Martínez E, Irvin WS, Bouten CV, Bertazzo S, Bendeck MP, Aikawa E. Discoidin domain receptor-1 regulates calcific extracellular vesicle release in vascular smooth muscle cell fibrocalcific response via transforming growth factor-β signaling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36:525–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Shyu KG, Wang BW, Chang H. Retraction: Hyperbaric oxygen activates discoidin domain receptor 2 via tumour necrosis factor-α and the p38 MAPK pathway to increase vascular smooth muscle cell migration through matrix metalloproteinase 2. Clin Sci (Lond). 2016;130:1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lin KL, Chou CH, Hsieh SC, Hwa SY, Lee MT, Wang FF. Transcriptional upregulation of DDR2 by ATF4 facilitates osteoblastic differentiation through p38 MAPK-mediated Runx2 activation. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:2489–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wada Y, Kataoka H, Yokose S, Ishizuya T, Miyazono K, Gao YH, Yamaguchi A. Changes in osteoblast phenotype during differentiation of enzymatically isolated rat calvaria cells. Bone. 1998;22(1998):479–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grither WR, Longmore GD. Inhibition of tumor-microenvironment interaction and tumor invasion by small-molecule allosteric inhibitor of DDR2 extracellular domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E7786–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Aeschlimann D, Kaupp O, Pauisson M. Transglutaminase catalyzed matrix cross-linking in differentiating cartilage: identification of osteonectin as a major glutaminyl substrate. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:881–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Numinskaya M, Kaartinen MT. Transglutaminases in mineralized tissues. Front Biosci. 2006;11:1591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Z, Yang Y, Zhao W, Wang Z, Landis WJ, Cui Q, Sahai N. Molecular mechanisms for intrafibrillar collagen mineralization in skeletal tissues. J Biomaterials. 2015;39:59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Barker TH, Baneyx G, Cardo-Vila M, Workman GA, Weaver M, Menon PM, Dedhar S, Rempel SA, Arap W, Pasqualini R, Vogel V, Sage EH. SPARC regulates extracellular matrix organization through its modulation of integrin-linked kinase activity. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:36483–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Leitinger B, Kwan AP. The discoidin domain receptor DDR2 is a receptor for type X collagen. Matrix Biol. 2006;25:355–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fu HL, Valiathan RR, Arkwright R, Sohail A, Mihai C, Kumarasiri M, Mahasenan KV, Mobashery S, Huang P, Agarwal G, Fridman R. Discoidin domain receptors: unique receptor tyrosine kinases in collagen-mediated signaling. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:7430–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ge C, Wang Z, Zhao LB, Liao J, Sun H, Franceschi RT. Discoidin receptor 2 controls bone formation and marrow adipogenesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:2193–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhang Y, Su J, Yu J, Bu X, Ren T, Liu X, Yao L. An essential role of discoidin domain receptor 2 (DDR2) in osteoblast differentiation and chondrocyte maturation via modulation of Runx2 activation. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:604–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ozawa H, Hoshi K, Amizuka N. Current concepts of bone mineralization. J Oral Biosci. 2008;50:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Amizuka N, Hasegawa T, Oda K, Luiz de Freitas PH, Hoshi K, Li M, Ozawa H. Histology of epiphyseal cartilage calcification and endochondral ossification. Front Biosci. 2012;4:2085–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hasegawa T, Yamamoto T, Tsuchiya E, Hongo H, Tsuboi K, Kudo A, Abe M, Yoshida T, Nagai T, Khadiza N, Yokoyama A, Oda K, Ozawa H, de Freitas PHL, Li M, Amizuka N. Ultrastructural and biochemical aspects of matrix vesicle mediated mineralization. J Dent Sci Rev. 2017;53:34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Landis WJ, Glimcher MJ. Electron diffraction and electron probe microanalysis of the mineral phase of bone tissue prepared by anhydrous techniques. J Ultrastruct Res. 1978;63:188–223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mahamid J, Sharir A, Addadi L, Weiner S. Amorphous calcium phosphate is a major component of the forming fin bones of zebra fish: Indications for an amorphous precursor phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:12748–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Mahamid J, Aichmayer B, Shimoni E, Ziblat R, Li C, Siegel S, Paris O, Fratzl P, Weiner S, Addadi L. Mapping amorphous calcium phosphate transformation into crystalline mineral from the cell to the bone in zebra fish fin rays. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:6316–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Melouane A, Yoshioka M, Kanzaki M, St-Amand J. Sparc, an EPS-induced gene, modulates the extracellular matrix and mitochondrial function via ILK/AMPK pathways in C2C12 cells. Life Sci. 2019;229:277–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Morrissey MA, Jayadev R, Miley GR, Blebea CA, Chi Q, Ihara SJ, Sherwood DR. SPARC promotes cell invasion in vivo by decreasing type IV collagen levels in the basement membrane. PLOS Genet. 2016;12:e1005905.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee YJ, Heo YS, Park HS, Lee SH, Lee SK, Jang YJ. Serum SPARC and matrix metalloproteinase-2 and metalloproteinase-9 concentrations after bariatric surgery in obese adults. Obes Surg. 2014;24:604–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang Z, Wu B, Jia S, Zhao Y, Hou R, Liu X, Wang X, Chen L, Yang X, Lei D, Wang L. The mechanically activated p38/MMP-2 signaling pathway promotes bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell migration in rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;76:55–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Karasawa Y, Tanaka H, Nakai K, Tanabe N, Kawato T, Maeno M, Shimizu N. Tension force downregulates matrix metalloproteinase expression and upregulates the expression of their inhibitors through MAPK signaling pathways in MC3T3-E1 cells. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12:905–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Richardson L, Dixon CL, Aguilera-Aguirre L, Menon R. Oxidative stress-induced TGF-beta/TAB1-mediated p38MAPK activation in human amnion epithelial cells. Biol Reprod. 2018;99:1100–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Tumbarello DA, Andrews MR, Brenton JD. SPARC regulates transforming growth factor beta induced (TGFBI) extracellular matrix deposition and paclitaxel response in ovarian cancer cells. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0162698.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun W, Feng J, Yi Q, Xu X, Chen Y, Tang L. SPARC acts as a mediator of TGF-β1 in promoting epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in A549 and H1299 lung cancer cells. BioFactors. 2018;44:453–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mansouri M, Kayserili H, Elalaoui SC, Nishimura G, Iida A, Lyahyai J, Miyake N, Matsumoto N, Sefiani A, Ikegawa S. Novel DDR2 mutation identified by whole exome sequencing in a Moroccan patient with spondylo-meta-epiphyseal dysplasia, short limb-abnormal calcification type. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170A:460–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Al-Kindi A, Kizhakkedath P, Xu H, John A, Sayegh AA, Ganesh A, Al-Awadi M, Al-Anbouri L, Al-Gazali L, Leitinger B, Ali BR. A novel mutation in DDR2 causing spondylo-meta-epiphyseal dysplasia with short limbs and abnormal calcifications (SMED-SL) results in defective intra-cellular trafficking. BMC Med Genet. 2014;15:42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Guo Y, Yang TL, Dong SS, Yan H, Hao RH, Chen XF, Chen JB, Tian Q, Li J, Shen H, Deng HW. Genetic analysis identifies DDR2 as a novel gene affecting bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures in Chinese population. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0117102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to show their appreciation to the reviewers for their helpful comments.

Funding

The Medical Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province Grant/Award Number: 2020KY373.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yun-Sen Zhu and Jiang-Nan Zhang contributed equally to this study

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Wenling, Chuan’an Nan Road NO 333, Wenling, 317500, Zhejiang, China

    Yun-Sen Zhu, Jiang-Nan Zhang, Ting-Ting Mo, Chang Jiang & Ru-Chao Ma

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215000, Jiangsu, China

    Liang Chen

Authors
  1. Yun-Sen Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jiang-Nan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ting-Ting Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ru-Chao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZYS and JC conceived the idea and conceptualised the study. ZJN and MTT collected the data. ZYS and CL analyzed the data. JC and ZYS drafted the manuscript, then MRC and ZJN reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final draft.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The use of rats in our study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Laboratory Animals of the First People’s Hospital of Wenling.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, YS., Zhang, JN., Mo, TT. et al. Discoidin domain receptor 2 activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase as an important pathway for osteonectin-regulating osteoblast mineralization. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 711 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02860-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02860-1

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X