Skip to main content

Complex ruptures of the quadriceps tendon: a systematic review of surgical procedures and outcomes



Chronic ruptures, ruptures following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and re-ruptures of the quadriceps tendon (QT) are rare. A systematic review of the current literature was conducted on their treatment and outcome to provide evidence-based indications for their management.


We searched published articles in English on chronic ruptures of QT, QT ruptures that occurred after TKA, and re-ruptures in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to January 2021. Twenty-five articles were included following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.


Data from 25 articles (97 patients) with a mean age of 57 were retrieved. Patients were classified into three groups depending on the type of rupture: 16 patients suffered chronic QTR, 78 a QTR after a TKA, and 9 patients reported a re-rupture. The most frequent surgical approaches were different for each group: Codivilla’s Y-V technique and end-to-end sutures were the most commonly used in the chronic tears group (62.5%), synthetic MESH was the most frequent choice in QTR after a TKA group (38 patients, 53%), while end-to-end sutures were the first choice in the re-rupture group (4 patients, 44%).


Complex ruptures of the QT can be chronic ruptures, re-ruptures, or ruptures occurring after TKA. The choice of the best surgical technique depends on the macroscopic quality of the tendon stumps rather than the timing of intervention. Evidence-based preventive and therapeutic strategies should be developed.


The tendinous insertion of the QT is composed of three distinct planes: the most superficial contains the rectus femoris, in the middle plane lie the vastus medialis and lateralis, and the deepest plane includes the vastus intermedius [1]. In chronic ruptures of the quadriceps tendon, this multi-layered organization is gradually lost, and retraction of the tendon collagen fibers occurs [1]. Quadriceps tendon rupture (QTR) is uncommon, with an annual incidence of 1.37 patients per 100.000 persons, affecting mainly middle aged males (M:F = 4.2:1, Mean age: 51.1 years) [2] . Most case series include patients with traumatic QTRs, and the main mechanism of injury reported is a sudden eccentric contraction of the quadriceps muscle complex, usually to prevent a fall [3]. Although a traumatic injury is often described, spontaneous, sometimes even bilateral ruptures, can occur in patients with predisposing systemic conditions such as chronic renal failure, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, hyperparathyroidism, and gout [4]. The use of drugs such as steroids and fluoroquinolones can lead to a QTR, and their use should be investigated in each patient [5]. QTR can also occur as a complication of a total knee arthroplasty, with extensor mechanism disruption, with an incidence between 0.1 and 3% of all TKAs [6, 7]. These ruptures can be extremely difficult to manage, with no consensus regarding the optimal technique. Primary repair is usually performed in acute QTRs after TKA, while in chronic tears after TKA augmentation, reconstruction is likely the most suitable option to restore the substance loss [8]. Different anatomical sites of the tendon can be affected. QTR can occur at the tendon-bone junction, or 1-2 cm proximal to the superior pole of the patella, a hypovascular area of the tendon [9]. Clinical history and physical examination play a crucial role in QTR diagnosis. Clinical signs are pain proximal to the patella, inability to actively extend the knee, and a palpable suprapatellar gap [10]. In suspected QTRs, radiography, ultrasound scan, and MRI have all been used to corroborate the clinical diagnosis [11]. The surgical approach for acute QTR is well established [12, 13]. Several surgical strategies have been suggested. The most commonly used and well described are transosseus sutures and anchors, but it is still unclear which technique offers the best postoperative advantages because of the limited number and quality of available studies [14]. A chronic tendon rupture has typically not been diagnosed or treated for at least 3 weeks [15]. The choice of the best surgical technique can be challenging, and it depends on the macroscopic quality of the tendon stump rather than the timing of intervention [16]. In chronic QTR, a large defect or fibrotic tendon retraction can be found, and direct repair, with transosseous sutures or anchors, is often not achievable.

Several augmentation techniques have been developed to restore the anatomy and functions of the quadriceps tendon [1, 3, 17,18,19]. However, there are no randomized controlled trials regarding the outcome of these procedures, and hence a lack of standard surgical protocols. A systematic review of the literature was performed to investigate the epidemiology, treatment and outcomes of chronic and QTRs after TKA, and re-ruptures of the QT.


Search strategy

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA guidelines [20]. The literature search was guided by the following points:

  • Problem: complex quadriceps tendon ruptures;

  • Intervention: end-to-end sutures, V-Y lengthening, tendon grafts;

  • Comparison: chronic ruptures vs chronic ruptures after TKA vs re-ruptures of QT;

  • Outcome: PROMs and complications.

Literature search

Two authors (**;**) independently performed the literature search up to June 2021. PubMed and Google scholar were accessed. Embase and Web of Science were also accessed to identify further articles. The following keywords were used in combination: quadriceps tendon, rupture, re-rupture, inveterate rupture, neglected rupture, chronic rupture, delayed rupture, chronic quadriceps tendon rupture, total knee arthroplasty (TKA), surgery, clinical outcomes. The same authors screened the titles resulting from the search in a separate fashion and accessed the full text of the articles of interest. Manual cross-reference of the bibliographies of the full-text articles was also performed. Disagreements were resolved by a third experienced researcher (**).

Eligibility criteria

All the published clinical studies in English reporting the incidence, risk factors, treatment, and complications of complex QTRs were accessed. Level I to IV of evidence articles, according to the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine [21], were considered. Reviews, technical notes, comments, letters, editorials, protocols, and guidelines were not eligible, nor were biomechanical, animal, and cadaveric studies. Studies reporting data on acute and intraoperative ruptures that occurred during TKA were excluded. Studies reporting QTRs following revision surgery for TKA were excluded. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were considered for inclusion.

Outcome of interests

Data extraction was performed by two authors (**;**). The following information was extracted from each article: mechanism of injury, mean range time before surgery, type of lesion/re-rupture, associated injuries and comorbidities, type of surgery, follow-up, complications.


After our initial literature search, a total of 173 potentially relevant citations were identified. Title and abstract review excluded 148 articles on the basis of irrelevant pathology or non-English language. A total of 25 articles for a total of 97 patients were eventually included in the present review. Study selection, retrieval and inclusion, and exclusion reasons are shown in the flowchart in Fig. 1. The relevant reference, the methods and the data collected from the included articles are shown in Table 1. Following the collection of data from the articles included in the present systematic review, patients were divided into three groups: chronic QTRs, QTRs that occurred after primary TKA, and re-ruptures (Figs. 2 and 3). The chronic QTR group included 16 patients (20 QTRs), and males were more represented (11 patients, 68.75%) with a mean age of 41. The female group included five patients (31.25%) and was older (mean age of 54 years). Seventy-two patients (73 QTRs) experienced a QTR after primary TKA, of whom 43 were females (60%) with a mean age of 58.7 years, while the male group was smaller (29 patients, 40%) with a mean age of 66 years. No significant difference was evidenced in relation to the surgical technique used for TKA. The re-rupture group included nine patients, with a mean time range from the first QTR of 322.5 days. Five patients (55.5%) were males with a mean age of 55.2 years, and four (44.5%) were females with a mean age of 70 years (Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8). Demographic characteristics and comorbidities of the included patients were reported in Table 2. Chronic quadriceps tendon reconstruction was performed using different surgical procedures: in the chronic QTR group, six patients were treated with grafts [three autografts (18.75%) and three allografts (18.75%)], in five patients (31.25%) tendon augmentation was performed using Codivilla’s V/Y technique, while in five patients (31.25%), end-to-end sutures were performed (Table 3). Synthetic mesh reconstruction was the most commonly used treatment in the QTR after the TKA group (38 patients, 53%); in 22 patients (30%), tendon augmentation was performed using Codivilla’s V/Y technique, three patients (4.5%) were treated with end-to-end sutures, while nine patients received allografts (12.5%). In this group, synthetic materials were chosen to restore tendon function in 38 patients (49%), and different materials were used: Marlex Mesh (27 patients, 71%), propylene mesh (seven patients, 18%), MUTARS mesh (three patients, 8%) and Keio-Leeds ligament in one case (3%). Re-ruptures were treated with end-to-end sutures in four cases (44%), with grafts in four cases [three autografts (34%) and one allograft (11%)], and with Codivilla’s V/Y technique in one patient (11%). Rehman et al. used a semitendinosus and gracilis autograft and reinforced it with a synthetic Mesh in one case (11%) of re-rupture. All the patients included in the present systematic review recovered active extension, even though at the last follow-up, some patients presented an extension lag. Sixteen patients (20.5%) from the TKA group reported an extension lag with a mean value of 6.3°, two patients (12.5%) from the chronic group presented an extensor lag with a mean value of 22.5°, and three patients (34%) who underwent a re-rupture reported a mean value of 7.3°. Forty-nine patients (50%) showed full active flexion, while 48 patients (50%) regained 90–130° flexion: 40 patients (51%) from the TKA group reported a mean 104° flexion, six patients (37.5%) from the chronic group reported a mean 103.6° flexion while two patients (22%) with re-ruptures reported a mean 90° flexion. In two patients, the findings at post-operative follow-up were not recorded. One patient with a chronic tear (6.25%) developed a skin ulcer at the level of the tibial fixation ten months after surgery. This was treated with surgical removal of the cerclage wire, with uneventful skin healing in 2 weeks [22]. As a result of QT repair after TKA, one patient (1%) developed a hematoma resulting in a delayed wound healing [23]. Furthermore, 13 patients (13.5%) reported severe complications: 9 (9%) re-ruptures of the QT, three (3%) deep infections that led in two cases to re-rupture and in one case to a graft failure, while one patient (1%) showed a chronic recurvatum. Several scoring systems were used to assess the functional outcome of the surgical technique, including the Lysholm Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Knee Society Score. However, only few studies referred to these PROMs; thus, further statistical considerations were not possible.

Fig. 1

Study selection, retrieval and inclusion and exclusion reasons

Table 1 Characteristics of the studied included
Fig. 2

Simultaneous chronic rupture of quadriceps tendon in a patient affected by tertiary hyperparatiroidism

Fig. 3

Simultaneous chronic rupture of contra-lateral patellar tendon in a patient affected by tertiary hyperparatiroidism

Fig. 4

The hemisoleus rotational flap provides a novel superior autograft reconstructive option for the treatment of chronic extensor mechanism disruption

Fig. 5

ipsilateral simultaneous ruptures of patellar and quadriceps tendon

Fig. 6

Autologous hamstring tendon used for revision of quadiceps tendon tears

Fig. 7

Knee osteoarthritis with chronic quadriceps tendon rupture treated with total knee arthroplasty and extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction

Fig. 8

Extensor mechanism reconstruction with use of Marlex Mesh

Table 2 Patients’ comorbidities
Table 3 QTR in patient previously treated with TKA


According to the main findings of the present systematic review, mostly chronic ruptures after TKA are reported in the literature (72 patients, 74.5%), followed by chronic QTRs (16 patients, 16.5%) and re-ruptures (9 patients, 9%). Synthetic augmentation was the most frequently used technique in chronic QTRs after primary TKA, while the use of tendon grafts was preferred in chronic QTRs and re-ruptures. After surgical treatment, the most commonly reported complications were re-ruptures (9 patients, 9%), deep infections (3 patients, 3%), and one patient (1%) developed knee recurvatum. Twenty-one patients (22%) reported an extensor lag, while 48 (50%) showed a decreased active flexion at the latest follow-up. The quadriceps tendon, given its structural and biomechanics properties, can sustain high loads without rupture. However, severe degenerative changes can impact the tendon and can be age related or caused by systemic conditions [24, 25]. It should not be surprising, therefore, that 73% of the patients from the articles included in the current study suffered from cardiovascular and metabolic conditions, such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic renal failure. Furthermore, previous surgery such as TKA can represent a risk factor, probably because of previous insult to the tendon structure [26]. Surgical treatment of chronic QTRs can be challenging because of the large defect and/or tissue degeneration in the substance of the tendon (Table 4). While ruptures of other tendons (Table 5), such as the flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis tendons, require swift intervention because of the prompt retraction of the tendon stumps, in extensor tendons, such as the triceps brachii and quadriceps tendon, retraction is slower, and usually can be treated acutely with direct repair [27]. Recently, a systematic review about chronic QTRs suggested that the timing of surgical intervention plays a crucial role in the functional outcomes, setting the cutoff for early treatment at 2–3 weeks from the injury [15]. However, all the articles included in the current study reported acceptable functional outcomes even though the surgery had occurred at least 40 days after the rupture. In this systematic review, only 16% of the patients were treated with direct suture. Augmentation techniques were employed in 82 patients (84%) using synthetic mesh (39%), autografts (12.5%), allografts (13.5%), and V-Y lengthening (29%) (Table 6). The autologous hamstring and peroneus longus (PL) tendon grafts were the most commonly used autografts in chronically retracted and re-ruptured tendons: McCormick and Rehman both performed a bilateral hamstring autograft to restore a large substance defect caused by a re-rupture of the quadriceps tendon after primary repair, and Rehman et al. used reinforcement with a prolene mesh and PRP injection [19, 28]. However, comparing results in the studies reporting the outcomes of surgery where both gracilis and semitendinosus had been used, McCormick et al. reported better results in terms of clinical outcomes (ROM, active flexion and lag absence) and return to daily activities, while Leopardi et al. and Rehman et al. reported an average 7.5° extensor lag at follow-up [17, 19, 28]. Other autologous grafts have been used, such as the contralateral ilio-tibial (IT) band and a medial gastrocnemius-soleus rotational flap. All of these produced good functional results with no further complication, except for one patient treated with contralateral IT band graft who reported a 40° extensor lag at 9 months follow-up [29, 30]. Tendon augmentation with an allograft was used in 13 patients (13%), mostly in QTRs after prior TKA, and Achilles tendon (AT) bone block allografts were most frequently used (ten patients, 11%): Wise et al. and Lim et al. treated six and three patients respectively with an Achilles tendon allograft, showing better results compared to the full extensor mechanism allograft reported by Burnett et al. [31] Even though the Achilles tendon is often considered the most suitable allograft option, the patients included in the current study treated with AT allografts reported an average 12° extensor lag at follow-up, with graft failure from deep infection in one case (1%) [32,33,34]. Complete extensor-mechanism allografting was performed in two patients (2%), with no extension lag, full active extension, and no further complications except for a skin ulcer in one case [22, 35]. One patient (1%) was treated with a tibialis anterior allograft, showing good functional results at the latest follow-up [36]. Furthermore, 35 patients (36%) with a complete QTR after TKA underwent synthetic mesh tendon reconstruction, but reported nine re-ruptures, of which five required a MESH revision and 2 developed a deep infection [37, 38]. The past medical history plays a crucial role in the choice of surgical strategy: in patients with chronic QTRs with no history of TKA, end-to-end sutures produce a good clinical outcome, even if the timing of the rupture is longer than 6 weeks. On the other hand, in patients who have undergone a TKA, direct repairs produce unpredictable outcomes, and the repair often needs to be reinforced [31]. The great discrepancy in results following treatment of patients with or without a TKA can be explained by the older age and comorbidities of the TKA group: in the current study, the mean age of patients with chronic QTRs was 44, while the mean age of the patients with chronic QTRs following TKA was 68.5 years old. Furthermore, a part of this discrepancy may be explained by the impaired quadriceps blood supply, reduced by the arthrotomy used to expose the joint [39]. Nine patients (9%) treated with mesh augmentation endured a re-rupture which required revision in five cases, while deep infection and re-rupture occurred in two of them (2%) with graft failure. One patient, treated with an Achilles tendon allograft, reported graft failure as a consequence of deep infection. Furthermore, four patients (4%) treated with late suture repair for QTR after TKA experienced a re-rupture. Further prospective studies are needed to establish a clear rehabilitation protocol for chronic QTRs, QTRs after TKA, and re-ruptures. Usually, published studies evaluate surgical outcomes through scales and scoring systems such as VAS, KSS, IKDC, and Lysholm Score, and quadriceps strength is measured with isokinetic tests on both the healthy and the treated legs. In the current study, only eight of 25 studies reported the use of a scoring system: in six studies, the Knee Society Score was assessed, while in two studies the Lysholm score was used. Furthermore, from the analysis of the reported follow-up, it emerged that only 12 studies evaluated the return to daily activities, while only Leopardi et al. [17] and McCormick et al. [28] documented the return to sport. While several protocols are available for acute QTR rehabilitation, there is a lack of studies about rehabilitation and follow-up after treatment of chronic ruptures, ruptures after TKA, and re-ruptures. In this study, the mean period of immobilization reported was 5.7 weeks, even though Abdel et al. and Nodzo et al., who performed tendon augmentation using synthetic mesh in patients with QTR after TKA, reported longer immobilization periods of respectively 12 and 8 weeks [37, 38]. The choice of the best procedure is closely linked to the type of lesion. The size of the substance loss and the quality of the tendon stumps appear to be the most relevant factors in the choice of surgical management of these ruptures, rather than the timing of the rupture. Chronic QTRs and re-ruptures were usually treated with grafts. Autografts showed better functional outcomes and lower complications rates than allografts. Ruptures following TKA were mainly treated with synthetic augmentation techniques, with the highest rate of re-ruptures and complications. Although autografts appear to be the most suitable option to treat complex QTRs, further comparative studies are needed to guide the choice of the graft and the best surgical technique.

Table 4 Chronic QTR
Table 5 Re-rupture of quadriceps tendon
Table 6 Surgical technique used in QTR treatment

This study has several limitations. First, the retrospective design and the lack of blinding of most of the included studies. The included studies did not mention the type of prosthesis. For this reason, it was impossible to compare the outcomes of QT repair in unicompartimental or total knee arthroplasty, and reported different surgical approaches without a general consensus on the best surgical management, which could represent an important source of bias. Given these limitations, results from the present study must therefore be interpreted with caution. Future studies should compare surgical procedures to establish a gold standard for the treatment of complex QTRs.


Complex ruptures of the QT can be chronic ruptures, re-ruptures, or ruptures that occurred after TKA. Augmentation techniques are usually chosen to deal with loss or poor quality of tendon substance. Autografts have shown good functional outcomes in the treatment of complex QTRs. However, given the lack of evidence-based recommendations, surgeons’ experience seems to be the key factor in the choice of the most appropriate procedure.

Availability of data and materials

This study does not contain any third material.



Total knee arthroplasty


Quadriceps tendon


Quadriceps tendon rupture


Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses


  1. 1.

    Ilan DI, Tejwani N, Keschner M, Leibman M. Quadriceps tendon rupture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(3):192–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury. 2008;39(12):1338–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Scuderi C. Ruptures of the quadriceps tendon; study of twenty tendon ruptures. Am J Surg. 1958;95(4):626–34.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shah MK. Simultaneous bilateral rupture of quadriceps tendons: analysis of risk factors and associations. South Med J. 2002;95(8):860–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Khaliq Y, Zhanel GG. Musculoskeletal injury associated with fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32(495-502):vi.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Aracil J, Salom M, Aroca JE, Torro V, Lopez-Quiles D. Extensor apparatus reconstruction with Leeds-Keio ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14(2):204–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lynch AF, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1987;2(2):135–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maffulli N, Spiezia F, La Verde L, et al. The management of extensor mechanism disruption after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2017;25(1):41–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yepes H, Tang M, Morris SF, Stanish WD. Relationship between hypovascular zones and patterns of ruptures of the quadriceps tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(10):2135–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Siwek CW, Rao JP. Ruptures of the extensor mechanism of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(6):932–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Spector ED, DiMarcangelo MT, Jacoby JH. The radiologic diagnosis of quadriceps tendon rupture. N J Med. 1995;92(9):590–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    McLaughlin HL, Francis KC. Operative repair of injuries to the quadriceps extensor mechanism. Am J Surg. 1956;91(4):651–3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Brossard P, Le Roux G, Vasse B, et al. Acute quadriceps tendon rupture repaired by suture anchors: Outcomes at 7 years' follow-up in 25 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(4):597–601.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hochheim M, Bartels E, Iversen J. Quadriceps tendon rupture. Anchor or transosseous suture? A systematic review. Muscle Ligaments and Tendons. Journal. 2019;09:356.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Elattar O, McBeth Z, Curry EJ, Parisien RL, Galvin JW, Li X. Management of chronic quadriceps tendon rupture: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2021;9(5).

  16. 16.

    Katzman BM, Silberberg S, Caligiuri DA, Klein DM, DiPaolo P. Delayed repair of a quadriceps tendon. Orthopedics. 1997;20(6):553–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Leopardi P, Vico G, Rosa D, et al. Reconstruction of a chronic quadriceps tendon tear in a body builder. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14(10):1007–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rust PA, Tanna N, Spicer DD. Repair of ruptured quadriceps tendon with Leeds-Keio ligament following revision knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(4):370–2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Rehman H, Kovacs P. Quadriceps tendon repair using hamstring, prolene mesh and autologous conditioned plasma augmentation A novel technique for repair of chronic quadriceps tendon rupture. Knee. 2015;22(6):664–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, for the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339(jul21 1):b2535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Howick J CI, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Carl Heneghan, Liberati A, Moschetti I, Phillips B, Thornton H, Goddard O, Hodgkinson M. 2011. The 2011 Oxford CEBM Levels of Evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Available at

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lamberti A, Loconte F, Spinarelli A, Baldini A. Bilateral extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction for chronic spontaneous rupture: a case report and review of the literature. JBJS Case Connect. 2019;9(2):e0058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shi SM, Shi GG, Laurent EM, Ninomiya JT. Modified V-Y turndown flap augmentation for quadriceps tendon rupture following total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(11):1010–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Garner MR, Gausden E, Berkes MB, Nguyen JT, Lorich DG. Extensor mechanism injuries of the knee: demographic characteristics and comorbidities from a review of 726 patient records. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(19):1592–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Assiotis A, Pengas I, Vemulapalli K. Bilateral quadriceps tendon rupture in a seasoned marathon runner with patellar spurs. Grand Rounds. 2011:11.

  26. 26.

    Ng J, Balcells-Nolla P, James PJ, Bloch BV. Extensor mechanism failure in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6(3):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Oliva F, Sesti FF, Gasparini M, et al. Chronic distal triceps brachii tendon ruptures. A systematic review of surgical procedures and outcomes. Muscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal. 2020;10:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    McCormick F, Nwachukwu BU, Kim J, Martin SD. Autologous hamstring tendon used for revision of quadiceps tendon tears. Orthopedics. 2013;36(4):e529–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Auregan JC, Lin JD, Lombardi JM, Jang E, Macaulay W, Rosenwasser MP. The hemisoleus rotational flap provides a novel superior autograft reconstructive option for the treatment of chronic extensor mechanism disruption. Arthroplast Today. 2016;2(2):49–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Poonnoose PM, Korula RJ, Oommen AT. Chronic rupture of the extensor apparatus of the knee joint. Med J Malaysia. 2005;60(4):511–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Burnett RS, Berger RA, Paprosky WG, et al. Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty A comparison of two techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(12):2694–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Forslund J, Gold S, Gelber J. Allograft reconstruction of a chronic quadriceps tendon rupture with use of a novel technique. JBJS Case Connect. 2014;4(2):e42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lim CT, Amanatullah DF, Huddleston JI 3rd, et al. Reconstruction of disrupted extensor mechanism after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(10):3134–40.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wise BT, Erens G, Pour AE, Bradbury TL, Roberson JR. Long-term results of extensor mechanism reconstruction using Achilles tendon allograft after total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2018;42(10):2367–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Piatek AZ, Lee P, DeRogatis MJ, et al. Knee osteoarthritis with chronic quadriceps tendon rupture treated with total knee arthroplasty and extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2018;8(3):e46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lee SH, Song EK, Seon JK, Woo SH. Surgical treatment of neglected traumatic quadriceps tendon rupture with knee ankylosis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016;28(2):161–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Abdel MP, Pagnano MW, Perry KI, Hanssen AD. Extensor mechanism reconstruction with use of Marlex mesh. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019;9(2):e21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nodzo SR, Rachala SR. Polypropylene mesh augmentation for complete quadriceps rupture after total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2016;23(1):177–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty Effect of a lateral release and sacrifice of the superior lateral geniculate artery. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11(4):368–72.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Grecomoro G, Camarda L, Martorana U. Simultaneous chronic rupture of quadriceps tendon and contra-lateral patellar tendon in a patient affected by tertiary hyperparatiroidism. J Orthop Traumatol. 2008;9(3):159–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hassani ZA, Boufettal M, Mahfoud M, et al. Neglected rupture of the quadriceps tendon in a patient with chronic renal failure (case report and review of the literature). Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18:55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Karahasanoglu I, Yologlu O, Kerimoglu S, et al. Neglected ipsilateral simultaneous ruptures of patellar and quadriceps tendon. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2015;26(1):49–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kazimoglu C, Yagdi S, Karapinar H, et al. Bilateral quadriceps tendon rupture and coexistent femoral neck fracture in a patient with chronic renal failure. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2007;41(5):393–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ormaza A, Moreta J, Mosquera J, de Ugarte OS, JLMD M. Chronic quadriceps tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty augmented with synthetic mesh. Orthopedics. 2017;40(1):38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pocock CA, Trikha SP, Bell JS. Delayed reconstruction of a quadriceps tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(1):221–4.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Rizio L, Jarmon N. Chronic quadriceps rupture: treatment with lengthening and early mobilization without cerclage augmentation and a report of three cases. J Knee Surg. 2008;21(1):34–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Tao Z, Liu W, Ma W, Luo P, Zhi S, Zhou R. A simultaneous bilateral quadriceps and patellar tendons rupture in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing long-term hemodialysis: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Dobbs RE, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Pagnano MW. Quadriceps tendon rupture after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence, complications, and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(1):37–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information




EM: literature search, data extraction, writing; FM: supervision, revision, final approval; FO: literature search, data extraction; NM: revision, supervision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Migliorini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

All the author approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Prisma checklist.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oliva, F., Marsilio, E., Migliorini, F. et al. Complex ruptures of the quadriceps tendon: a systematic review of surgical procedures and outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 547 (2021).

Download citation


  • Quadriceps tendon
  • Rupture
  • Rerupture
  • Inveterated rupture
  • Neglected rupture
  • Chronic rupture
  • Chronic quadriceps tendon rupture and TKA
  • Surgery