Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The promotive role of USP1 inhibition in coordinating osteogenic differentiation and fracture healing during nonunion

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 18, Article number: 152 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Nonunion is a failure of fracture healing and a major complication after fractures. Ubiquitin-specific protease 1 (USP1) is a deubiquitinase that involved in cell differentiation and cell response to DNA damage. Herein we investigated the expression, function and mechanism of USP1 in nonunion.

Methods and results

Clinical samples were used to detect the USP1 expression in nonunion. ML323 was selected to inhibit USP1 expression throughout the study. Rat models and mouse embryonic osteoblasts cells (MC3T3-E1) were used to investigate the effects of USP1 inhibition on fracture healing and osteogenesis in vivo and in vitro, respectively. Histological changes were examined by micro-computerized tomography (Micro-CT), hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining and Masson staining. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity detection and alizarin red staining were used for osteogenic differentiation observation. The expression of related factors was detected by quantitative real-time PCR, western blot or immunohistochemistry (IHC). It was shown that USP1 was highly expressed in nonunion patients and nonunion rats. USP1 inhibition by ML323 promoted fracture healing in nonunion rats and facilitated the expression of osteogenesis-related factors and the signaling of PI3K/Akt pathway. In addition, USP1 inhibition accelerated osteogenic differentiation and promoting PI3K/Akt signaling in MC3T3-E1 cells.

Conclusions

USP1 inhibition plays a promotive role in coordinating osteogenic differentiation and fracture healing during nonunion. PI3K/Akt may be the downstream pathway of USP1.

Introduction

Bone is one of the most important organs in humans and animals, and is a tissue that can continuously remodel throughout the life. The formation of bone is a complex dynamic process, which is regulated by various bone growth factors [1]. Osteogenesis is a sequential cascade that pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells develop into osteoblasts, which then control the synthesis, secretion and mineralization of bone matrix [2, 3].

Bone nonunion, also called fracture nonunion, is a serious complication of fracture. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines nonunion as a fracture that fails to heal within nine months and shows no signs of healing for three consecutive months [4]. The probability of fracture nonunion occurrence is about 5% to 10% and fracture nonunion often causes pain, functional and psychological disorders for patients [5, 6]. Moreover, fracture nonunion results in poor quality of life, significant medical costs due to prolonged hospital stay and reoperation, even increased risk of death [7, 8]. The risk of fracture nonunion is associated with multiple factors, including fracture severity, fracture location, infection, comorbidities and medications [5, 9]. At present, surgery is the main treatment for fracture nonunion, but it remains a challenge in clinical practice because the etiology and mechanism of fracture nonunion are not clear. Searching for targets to promote fracture healing is one of the current research priorities.

Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 1 (USP1) is one of the members of ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) family, and is involved in cell differentiation and regulates cell response to DNA damage [10]. It has been shown that USP1 could form a deubiquitinase complex with USP1-associated factor 1 (UAF1) [11], and they participate in the pathogenesis of tumors and enhance the antiviral response together [12]. In addition, the function of the USP1/UAF1 complex in inflammation was discovered through its interaction with NLRP3 [13]. However, the function of USP1 in fracture healing has not been reported.

Bone formation is divided into intramembranous ossification and endochondral ossification [14]. Fracture healing often begins with the chemotaxis and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells. Mouse embryonic osteoblast cell line MC3T3-E1 has high proliferation and differentiation characteristics. Hence, it is a classic model for studying osteogenic differentiation in vitro [15]. Studies have shown that promoting osteogenic differentiation in MC3T3-E1 cells is beneficial to fracture healing in nonunion rats [16, 17]. Importantly, in the process of osteogenic differentiation, USP1 modification significantly affected the osteogenic differentiation of osteoblasts [18]. As a selective inhibitor of USP1, ML323 has been reported to enhance the osteogenesis ability of the dental pulp stem cells [19]. Based on these facts, we hypothesized that inhibition of USP1 by ML323 would benefit fracture healing.

Phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (PI3K) is a member of heterodimeric lipid kinases, playing a key role in cellular activities. Akt is a kind of serine protein kinase served as the downstream target of PI3K [20]. The PI3K/Akt pathway has a great impact on the regulation of metabolism, gene expression, protein synthesis, cell proliferation and survival [21]. Activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway contributes to osteogenic differentiation and osteogenesis [22, 23]. The results of the study by Dana Goldbraikh et al. showed that USP1 promoted the deubiquitination of Akt and reduced its phosphorylation level, while inhibition of USP1 promoted the activation of PI3K/Akt pathway [24]. In this study, we also investigated the involvement of PI3K-Akt signaling in the function of USP1 in nonunion.

Materials and methods

Patient recruitment and sample tissue collection

This work was performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, and it received the institutional ethics committee approval and followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Study participants were patients with atrophic nonunion of limbs long bone (n = 10) and patients with normal fracture healing (n = 9). Among the 10 nonunion patients (median age: 43, range 16–71, 7 males and 3 females), fracture site was mostly at the tibia, and most of these patients had closed nonunion. In nine patients with normal fracture healing (median age: 48, range 31–69, 8 males and 1 female), fracture site was mostly at the fibula. None of the above patients had a past medical history. All patients signed informed consent and consent for publication. Nonunion tissues from patients with nonunion and callus tissues from patients with normal fracture healing were collected by surgery for detection of target gene expression at the clinical level.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted by the TRIpure lysate (BioTeke, Beijing). The concentration of RNA was determined by UV spectrophotometer (Thermo, MA). Reverse transcription was performed by using BeyoRT II M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Beyotime, Shanghai). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed by 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix on Exicycler 96 fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (BIONEER, Daejeon). All gene expression was analyzed using the 2–Δ∆Ct method. The primer sequences were as follows: rat USP1: forward, GTGGCTTGGAGTTTGATT and reverse, CATTAGTCGGCTTTGTGC; homo USP1: forward, TATTTGCGGTTGTGATG and reverse, CAATGGTTCTGGCTTAC.

Nonunion model and treatment

According to the methodology of previous literature [25], 12-week-old female Wistar rats (purchased from Liaoning Changsheng biotechnology co., Ltd, Benxi) were selected and randomly divided into following groups: fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group. Under anesthesia, the lateral skin of the right thigh of rats was dissected in a sterile environment. The right femur was exposed after blunt dissection of the muscle, and a transverse osteotomy was performed. The periosteum within 2 mm of the broken end of nonunion group was burned with a heated needle, and care was taken to avoid burning the cortex of the bone. A 1.5-mm-diameter, 45-mm-length medical stainless needle was inserted through the medullary cavity of the distal femur. Then, the proximal end of the needle was threaded through the top of the greater trochanter of the femur while bending the proximal end to prevent detachment. During the fixation of femoral fractures in rats, a spacer is placed at the fracture site to maintain a consistent fracture gap length (approximately 1.5 mm). Finally, the lateral femoral incision was sutured layer-by-layer. The periosteum in fracture healing group was not burned while the rest procedures were consistent. Rats in nonunion + ML323 group received intraperitoneal injection of 3 mg/kg ML323 (Aladdin, Shanghai) once a week for six times. Rats in nonunion group were given the same amount of solvent (3 mg/kg). The fracture tissues was collected after 6 weeks of model establishment. Part of the fracture tissues were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, the other part of the fracture tissues was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in – 70 °C ultra-low temperature refrigerator for subsequent experiments. These experiments were performed in strict accordance with the Guideline for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Experimental Animals Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University.

Western blot

Total protein from fracture tissues was extracted from all groups six weeks after the operation, followed by measuring concentration of protein extract with a BCA kit (Beyotime, Shanghai). Equal amounts of protein samples were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE) electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, Millipore, MA) membrane. The obtained PVDF membrane was incubated overnight with primary antibodies against USP1 (1:3000, Proteintech, Wuhan), BMP2 (1:1000, Affinity, Changzhou), RUNX2 (1:1000, Abclonal, Wuhan), OCN (1:500, Abclonal, Wuhan), Akt (1:1000, Affinity, Changzhou), p-AktT308 (1:1000, Affinity, Changzhou) and p-AktS473 (1:1000, Affinity, Changzhou) at 4 °C. At last, after washed by TBST (Tris-buffered saline + Tween), the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies goat anti-rabbit IgG (Abclonal, Changzhou) and goat anti-mouse IgG (Abclonal, Wuhan) at 37 °C for 40 min. The bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Beyotime, Shanghai) detection reagent and the optical density values of the target bands were analyzed by image analysis software (Tanon, Shanghai).

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) staining

The right femur was collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48 h, decalcified with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) decalcium solution at 37 °C and embedded in paraffin. Sections with 5-µm thickness were obtained, deparaffinized to water, and then subjected to histological staining. For IHC, the sections were placed in boiled antigen repair solution for 10 min and immersed in PBS for 5 min in sequence, so as to repeat three times for antigen repair. Next, the sections were incubated with 3% H2O2 (Sinopharm, Shanghai) for 15 min at room temperature and immersed in PBS for 5 min. After three repetitions, the sections were blocked with 1% BSA (Sangon, Shanghai) and incubated with primary antibodies targeting USP1 (1:200, Proteintech, Wuhan) and BMP2 (1:200, Affinity, Liyang) overnight at 4 °C. Then, they were incubated with secondary antibodies HRP labeled goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (1:500, ThermoFisher, Waltham) for 60 min at 37 °C. Finally, DAB (Maxim, Fuzhou) was used to display the color of the sections, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (Solarbio, Beijing) and observed under a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo). For H&E staining, the sections were successively immersed in hematoxylin (Solarbio, Beijing) for 5 min, distilled water for 5 min, and 1% hydrochloric acid alcohol for 3 s, flushed with running water for 20 min, immersed in distilled water for 2 min, and finally immersed in eosin (Sangon, Shanghai) staining solution for 3 min. After the sections were blocked, the sections were viewed with a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo) and photographed.

Micro-computerized tomography (Micro-CT)

Rats were imaged using a high-resolution micro-computerized tomography (Quantum GX μCT System, PerkinElmer, Waltham) at weeks 6. Visualization and the data of bone volume/total volume × 100% (BV/TV), trabecular number (TbN), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) were obtained using the Quantum GX μCT Workstation imaging software (PerkinElmer, Waltham).

Masson staining (MS)

The prepared paraffin sections were first nucleated with Regaud hematoxylin staining solution, then stained with Lichun red acid magenta dye (Sinopharm, Shanghai), and finally counterstained with aniline blue. The blue color was observed using an Olympus BX53 microscope (Tokyo), which indicates new or mature bone.

Cell culture

MC3T3-E1 cells were purchased from iCell Bioscience Inc (Shanghai) and were incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 ℃ overnight. Cells were divided into following groups: control group, osteogenic differentiation medium (ODM) group, ODM + Vehicle group and ODM + ML323 group. In ODM group, MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in minimum essential medium α (MEMα, iCell bioscience, Shanghai), a kind of ODM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Zhejiang TianHang Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Huzhou), 10 mM β-glycerophosphate (Macklin, Shanghai) and 50 µg/mL ascorbic acid (Aladdin, Shanghai) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 ℃ to induce osteogenic differentiation for up to 14 days. Medium of ODM + ML323 group and ODM + Vehicle group were supplemented with ML323 (Macklin, Shanghai) and equal volume of solvent, respectively.

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity measurement

The cell samples of each group were resuspended with PBS, and the cells were broken by ultrasonic broken instrument (Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology Co.,Ltd., Ningbo) under the condition of ice bath on differentiation day 7. The protein content of the cell suspension was determined by BCA assay kit (Solarbio, Beijing). For quantification of ALP activity, ALP kit (Nanjing Jiancheng, Nanjing) was used.

Alizarin red staining and quantification

On osteogenic differentiation day 14, cell culture medium was discarded from the cell suspension of each group, and after washing twice with PBS, the cells were stained with alizarin red (Yuanye Bio, Shanghai) for 20 min. After washing with PBS twice again, photos were taken under a microscope (Olympus, Tokyo). For quantification of calcium deposition, the alizarin staining was extracted using 10% cetylpyridinium chloride (Macklin, Shanghai). Then, the absorbance of the extract was measured at 570 nm.

Statistical analysis

All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical tests were performed with Prism 8.0.2 (GraphPad, La Jolla). Comparisons of two groups were using unpaired Student’s t test and comparisons of multiple groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significance levels are marked as # or *p < 0.05, ## or **p < 0.01 and ns not significant.

Results

USP1 was highly expressed in nonunion patients and rats

To validate the USP1 expression in nonunion patients, we performed qPCR to analyze the mRNA expression levels of USP1 in fracture healing and nonunion samples. The expression levels of USP1 were higher in nonunion tissues than those in fracture healing tissues (Fig. 1A). In a rat model of nonunion, intraperitoneal injection of ML323 was for suppression of USP1 expression. The mRNA and protein expression levels of USP1 were higher in nonunion tissues of rats while the expression of USP1 was successfully suppressed in nonunion + ML323 group (Fig. 1B–D). We also confirmed these results by IHC staining assay that USP1 was highly expressed in nonunion tissues of rats than that in fracture healing, and that ML323 effectively inhibited the expression of USP1 in nonunion rats (Fig. 1E).

Fig. 1
figure 1

High expression of USP1 in nonunion tissues of patients and rats. A Relative mRNA expression of USP1 in fracture healing (n = 9) and nonunion patients (n = 10). B Relative mRNA expression of USP1 in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323) (n = 5/group). C & D Immunoblot and quantitative analysis for USP1 in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323) (n = 5/group). β-actin was used as a loading control. E Representative immunohistochemical (IHC) staining images of the expression and localization of USP1 in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323). Scale bar = 50 µm. ## indicates p < 0.01 in comparison with the fracture healing group; ** indicates p < 0.01 in comparison with the nonunion group

Full size image

USP1 inhibition promoted fracture healing in nonunion rats.

To evaluate the effect of USP1 inhibition on fracture healing in nonunion rats, micro-CT and histological staining were performed. Micro-CT analysis of trabecular bone from the right femur revealed that the BV/TV, Tb.N and Tb.Th were significantly increased and the Tb.Sp was significantly decreased when USP1 inhibition compared to nonunion group (Fig. 2A–D). The nonunion group showed the opposite performance compared to the fracture healing group. Micro-CT images of the fracture site and typical morphology images of right femur were shown in Fig. 2E. H&E staining results showed that there were medulla spaces with mesenchymal cells in fracture healing group, while in the nonunion group, fibrotic tissue formation was observed (Fig. 3A). In addition, fibrotic tissue was reduced in nonunion + ML323 group. The quality of bone repair was further evaluated by Masson staining (Fig. 3B). Compared with the fracture healing group, the nonunion group had less bone formation and poor bone quality. Moreover, MS sections of nonunion + ML323 group showed more blue staining, indicating good bone repair.

Fig. 2
figure 2

USP1 inhibition by ML323 promoted bone morphological changes in rats. A–D The BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th and Tb.Sp of right femur were measured using micro-CT (micro-computerized tomography) in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323) (n = 5/group). BV/TV, bone volume/total volume × 100%; Tb.N, trabecular number; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.Sp, trabecular separation. E The micro-CT images (left) and typical morphology images of right femur (right) in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323). ## indicates p < 0.01 in comparison with the fracture healing group; ** indicates p < 0.01 in comparison with the nonunion group

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

USP1 inhibition by ML323 enhanced bone regeneration in rats. A & B Hematoxylin and eosin (H & E) and Masson (MS) staining images of right femur tissue sections in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323). Scale bar = 500 µm (above) and scale bar = 200 µm (below) in the magnified images

Full size image

USP1 inhibition facilitated the expression of osteogenesis-related factors and the signaling of PI3K/Akt pathway in nonunion rats.

Immunoblot and quantitative analysis (Fig. 4A and B) showed that RUNX2 and OCN were significantly increased when USP1 inhibition. Although inhibition of USP1 had no obvious effect on Akt phosphorylation, it enhanced Akt phosphorylation at T308 and S473. The expression of BMP2 was further detected by IHC staining (Fig. 4C). Results showed that BMP2 was highly expressed in the fracture healing group and the nonunion + ML323 groups, but lowly expressed in the nonunion group.

Fig. 4
figure 4

USP1 inhibition increased the levels of osteogenesis-related factors and the phosphorylation of PI3K/Akt pathway in nonunion rats. A & B Immunoblot and quantitative analysis for RUNX2, OCN, Akt, p-AktT308 and p-AktS473 in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323) (n = 5/group). β-actin was used as a loading control. Akt was used as an internal control for p-AktT308 and p-AktS473. C IHC staining images of the expression of BMP2 in rats of fracture healing group, nonunion group and nonunion + ML323 group (nonunion rats treated with ML323). Scale bar = 50 µm. ## indicates p < 0.01 in comparison with the fracture healing group; ** indicates p < 0.01 in comparison with the nonunion group and ns indicates not significant

Full size image

USP1 inhibition accelerated osteogenic differentiation and increasing PI3K/Akt signaling in MC3T3-E1 cells

To determine the role of USP1 in osteogenic differentiation, MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured and induced to osteogenic differentiation. Analysis of osteogenesis-related factors after induction of osteoblastic differentiation for seven days showed significant changes in BMP2, RUNX2 and OCN protein levels in both osteogenic differentiation medium (ODM) group and ODM + ML323 group compared to control group and ODM + Vehicle group, respectively (Fig. 5A–C). We also found an increase in the levels of AktT308 and AktS473 phosphorylation; however, no changes in Akt phosphorylation were detected. ALP activity was further examined after osteogenic differentiation was induced for 7 days and results showed that ALP activity of cells was significantly increased in ODM + ML323 group (Fig. 5D). Likewise, quantitative of Alizarin Red staining, upon 14-day osteoblastic induction, was significantly higher in cells from ODM + ML323 group (Fig. 5E). These results concluded that USP1 inhibition positively impacted osteogenic differentiation in the MC3T3-E1 cells.

Fig. 5
figure 5

USP1 inhibition promoted osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 and PI3K/Akt pathway. A–C Protein levels and quantitative analysis for BMP2, RUNX2, OCN, p-AktS473, p-AktT308 and Akt in control group, ODM group, ODM + Vehicle group and ODM + ML323 group after osteogenic differentiation was induced for 7 days (n = 3/group). β-actin was used as a loading control. Akt was used as an internal control for p-AktT308 and p-AktS473. D Quantitative measurement of ALP activity in each group after osteogenic differentiation was induced for 7 days (n = 3/group). E Alizarin red staining (left) and quantification (right) were performed on day 14 of osteogenic differentiation (n = 3/group). ODM, osteogenic differentiation medium. Scale bar = 200 µm. # and ## indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 in comparison with the control group, respectively; * and ** indicate p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 in comparison with the ODM + Vehicle group, respectively; ns indicates not significant

Full size image

Discussion

Nonunion brings a lot of physical and psychological troubles to patients, making it particularly important to study the pathogenesis of fracture nonunion. There are many factors affecting fracture nonunion, including mechanical, biological, patient-dependent and patient-independent factors [26]. Although there have been many theories and studies on nonunion [27,28,29], the mechanisms are still poorly understood. Waki et al. [30] reported that the functions of certain miRNAs and changes to their patterns of expression are crucial in the pathogenesis of nonunion. In addition, USP1 was reported to be a direct target of miR-192-5p in osteosarcoma cells [31]. At present, studies on USP1 mainly focus on cancer and tumors [32, 33], while its role in nonunion is still unknown. Some members of the USP family have been shown to promote or inhibit osteogenic differentiation in a recent review [34]. In this study, our clinical findings confirmed that USP1 mRNA levels were elevated in nonunion tissues of patients with atrophic nonunion of limbs long bone.

In order to explore the expression and function of USP1 in nonunion, animal models of nonunion were established. In nonunion rats, both the mRNA and protein expression of USP1 were upregulated, whereas suppressed after intraperitoneal injection of ML323 in nonunion rats. ML323 is a small molecule effective inhibitor of USP1, and it targets two major DNA damage response pathways by inhibiting USP1 simultaneously [35]. Baozhi Song et al. first found that USP1 is a key downstream target gene of ML323 through GSEA analysis, and inhibition of USP1 restrained cell proliferation and affected cell progression of ovarian cancer [33]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that USP1 was expressed at high levels in malignant diseases such as osteosarcoma [18], human breast cancer [36] and hepatocellular carcinoma [37]. USP4 which together with USP1 belongs to the USP family, negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation and bone formation induced by WNT [38]. However, USP26 has been shown osteoprotective role of regulating bone homeostasis by coordinating bone formation and resorption [39]. In addition, osteogenic differentiation was inhibited by USP34 depletion [40] and USP2 was also reported to be associated with osteogenesis [41]. These evidences suggest that USP family is essential for osteogenic differentiation and bone formation. Therefore, we further explored the effect of USP1 inhibition on fracture healing in nonunion rats.

The results of micro-CT of the right femur from nonunion rats demonstrated that ML323 treatment improved the microstructure of the trabecular bone. Increases in BV/TV, Tb.N, Tb.Th and decreases in Tb.Sp of right femur were found in the nonunion rats receiving ML323, which was confirmed by results of histomorphology. Similar dynamics of bone neogenesis have previously been described in rat models [42, 43]. From a molecular perspective, bone healing is characterized by high expression of growth factors involved in the proliferation and differentiation of fibroblasts, osteoblasts, and endothelial cells [44, 45]. RUNX family transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), an important member of the Runx TF family, is one of the important factors controlling osteoblast development and bone formation [46]. Bone morphogenetic protein 2(BMP-2) is considered to be the most effective bone repair cytokine [47]. Osteocalcin (OCN) is an important part of the extracellular matrix that acts as a late osteogenic marker [48, 49]. In our study, USP1 inhibition facilitated the expression of these osteogenesis-related factors. In Yanping Gong et al. study, increased expression of osteogenic markers was used to explain the possible mechanism by which adiponectin promotes fracture healing [50].

The PI3K/Akt signaling pathway is involved in a wide range of physiological processes. A previous report showed that downregulation of USP1 increased p-AktT308 levels in muscle of fasting mice with little effect on p-AktS473 levels [24], while another report showed that downregulation of USP1 significantly increased p-AktS473 levels and slightly increased p-AktT308 levels in lung cancer cells [51]. The results of this study showed that USP1 inhibition significantly increased p-AktS473 and p-AktT308 levels, slightly increased Akt level. Inversely, human differentiated embryonic chondrocyte expressed gene 1 deficiency attenuates the PI3KCA/Akt/GSK3β signaling by affecting levels of PI3KCA, p-Ser473-Akt and p-Ser9-GSK3β, which has a negative effect on osteogenic differentiation in the bone mesenchymal stem cells [52]. In addition, overexpression of miR-181a/b-1 increases PI3K/Akt signaling by inducing p-AktT308 phosphorylation during osteogenesis [53]. Therefore, we verified the role of USP1 inhibition in the differentiation of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts and its effect on the PI3K/Akt pathway. As expected, inhibition of USP1 may enhance the osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 in vitro by activating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, which were consistent with previous studies [54,55,56]. Measurement of ALP activity and quantification of calcification deposits in extracellular matrix are important means to evaluate ossification and mineralization of osteoblasts [55]. In the present study, our results further demonstrated that inhibition of USP1 contributed to increase of ALP activity and mineralization in osteoblasts. Interestingly, a recent study also suggested that ALP activity and alizarin red staining intensity were significantly decreased after USP34 depletion [40]. USP1 and USP6 inhibit osteogenesis in osseous tumors have been shown in previous studies [18, 57]. These data and our findings suggest that different members of the USP family have different roles in osteogenic differentiation and bone formation. Our study mainly demonstrated the expression and function of USP1 in nonunion.

Conclusion

In summary, our study shows that expression of USP1 in nonunion patients and rats increases and inhibition of USP1 promotes the fracture healing by facilitating the expression of osteogenesis-related factors and the signaling of PI3K/Akt pathway in nonunion rats. Moreover, inhibition of USP1 from MC3T3-E1 cells results in improvement of osteogenic differentiation and activation of PI3K/Akt pathway. Mechanically, PI3K/Akt may be the downstream pathway of USP1 inhibition. Our study provides a novel direction and demonstrates that USP1 represents a potential therapeutic target for nonunion treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

USP1:

Ubiquitin-specific protease 1

Micro-CT:

Micro-computerized tomography

H&E:

Hematoxylin & eosin

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

IHC:

Immunohistochemistry

FDA:

Food and drug administration

UAF1:

USP1-associated factor 1

PI3K:

Phosphoinositide 3‐kinase

qPCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel

PVDF:

Polyvinylidene fluoride

TBST:

Tris-buffered saline + Tween

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

ECL:

Enhanced chemiluminescence

BV/TV:

Bone volume/total volume × 100%

TbN:

Trabecular number

Tb.Th:

Trabecular thickness

Tb.Sp:

Trabecular separation

MS:

Masson staining

ODM:

Osteogenic differentiation medium

MEMα:

Minimum essential medium α

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

RUNX2:

RUNX family transcription factor 2

BMP-2:

Bone morphogenetic protein 2

OCN:

Osteocalcin

References

  1. Caetano-Lopes J, Canhao H, Fonseca JE. Osteoblasts and bone formation. Acta Reumatol Port. 2007;32(2):103–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. di Giacomo V, Cataldi A, Sancilio S. Biological factors, metals, and biomaterials regulating osteogenesis through autophagy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruff CB, Garofalo E, Holmes MA. Interpreting skeletal growth in the past from a functional and physiological perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2013;150(1):29–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ding ZC, Lin YK, Gan YK, Tang TT. Molecular pathogenesis of fracture nonunion. J Orthop Translat. 2018;14:45–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson JT, Ostrum RF, Prayson MJ, Della Rocca GJ, Mehta S, McKinley T, Wang Z, Steen RG. Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):e162775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wildemann B, Ignatius A, Leung F, Taitsman LA, Smith RM, Pesantez R, Stoddart MJ, Richards RG, Jupiter JB. Non-union bone fractures. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jensen SS, Jensen NM, Gundtoft PH, Kold S, Zura R, Viberg B. Risk factors for nonunion following surgically managed, traumatic, diaphyseal fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2022;7(7):516–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tian R, Zheng F, Zhao W, Zhang Y, Yuan J, Zhang B, Li L. Prevalence and influencing factors of nonunion in patients with tibial fracture: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mills L, Tsang J, Hopper G, Keenan G, Simpson AH. The multifactorial aetiology of fracture nonunion and the importance of searching for latent infection. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(10):512–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Santisteban I, Peters GJ, Giovannetti E, Rodriguez JA. USP1 deubiquitinase: cellular functions, regulatory mechanisms and emerging potential as target in cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2013;12:91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohn MA, Kee Y, Haas W, Gygi SP, D’Andrea AD. UAF1 is a subunit of multiple deubiquitinating enzyme complexes. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(8):5343–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu Z, Song H, Jia M, Zhang J, Wang W, Li Q, Zhang L, Zhao W. USP1-UAF1 deubiquitinase complex stabilizes TBK1 and enhances antiviral responses. J Exp Med. 2017;214(12):3553–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Song H, Zhao C, Yu Z, Li Q, Yan R, Qin Y, Jia M, Zhao W. UAF1 deubiquitinase complexes facilitate NLRP3 inflammasome activation by promoting NLRP3 expression. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):6042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, Longaker MT. Mechanisms of bone development and repair. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(11):696–711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tevlek A, Odabas S, Celik E, Aydin HM. Preparation of MC3T3-E1 cell sheets through short-term osteogenic medium application. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup2):1145–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mi B, Xiong Y, Yan C, Chen L, Xue H, Panayi AC, Hu L, Hu Y, Zhou W, Cao F, Liu G. Methyltransferase-like 3-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of miR-7212-5p drives osteoblast differentiation and fracture healing. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(11):6385–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Z, Hu P, Wang Z, Qiu X, Chen Y. BDNF promoted osteoblast migration and fracture healing by up-regulating integrin beta1 via TrkB-mediated ERK1/2 and AKT signalling. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(18):10792–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams SA, Maecker HL, French DM, Liu J, Gregg A, Silverstein LB, Cao TC, Carano RA, Dixit VM. USP1 deubiquitinates ID proteins to preserve a mesenchymal stem cell program in osteosarcoma. Cell. 2011;146(6):918–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim JY, Choung PH. USP1 inhibitor ML323 enhances osteogenic potential of human dental pulp stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;530(2):418–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. He X, Li Y, Deng B, Lin A, Zhang G, Ma M, Wang Y, Yang Y, Kang X. The PI3K/AKT signalling pathway in inflammation, cell death and glial scar formation after traumatic spinal cord injury: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Cell Prolif. 2022;55(9): e13275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghafouri-Fard S, Noie Alamdari A, Noee Alamdari Y, Abak A, Hussen BM, Taheri M, Jamali E. Role of PI3K/AKT pathway in squamous cell carcinoma with an especial focus on head and neck cancers. Cancer Cell Int. 2022;22(1):254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen L, Jiang W, Huang J, He BC, Zuo GW, Zhang W, Luo Q, Shi Q, Zhang BQ, Wagner ER, Luo J, Tang M, Wietholt C, Luo X, Bi Y, Su Y, Liu B, Kim SH, He CJ, Hu Y, Shen J, Rastegar F, Huang E, Gao Y, Gao JL, Zhou JZ, Reid RR, Luu HH, Haydon RC, He TC, Deng ZL. Insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF-2) potentiates BMP-9-induced osteogenic differentiation and bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(11):2447–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujita T, Azuma Y, Fukuyama R, Hattori Y, Yoshida C, Koida M, Ogita K, Komori T. Runx2 induces osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation and enhances their migration by coupling with PI3K-Akt signaling. J Cell Biol. 2004;166(1):85–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldbraikh D, Neufeld D, Eid-Mutlak Y, Lasry I, Gilda JE, Parnis A, Cohen S. USP1 deubiquitinates Akt to inhibit PI3K-Akt-FoxO signaling in muscle during prolonged starvation. EMBO Rep. 2020;21(4): e48791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang L, Jiao G, Ren S, Zhang X, Li C, Wu W, Wang H, Liu H, Zhou H, Chen Y. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhance fracture healing through the promotion of osteogenesis and angiogenesis in a rat model of nonunion. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Niikura T, Lee SY, Sakai Y, Nishida K, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Causative factors of fracture nonunion: the proportions of mechanical, biological, patient-dependent, and patient-independent factors. J Orthop Sci. 2014;19(1):120–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Elliott DS, Newman KJ, Forward DP, Hahn DM, Ollivere B, Kojima K, Handley R, Rossiter ND, Wixted JJ, Smith RM, Moran CG. A unified theory of bone healing and nonunion: BHN theory. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(7):884–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Toosi S, Behravan N, Behravan J. Nonunion fractures, mesenchymal stem cells and bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106(9):2552–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeo JH, Kim JY. Surgical strategy for scaphoid nonunion treatment. J Hand Surg Asian Pac. 2018;23(4):450–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Waki T, Lee SY, Niikura T, Iwakura T, Dogaki Y, Okumachi E, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M. Profiling microRNA expression in fracture nonunions: potential role of microRNAs in nonunion formation studied in a rat model. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(8):1144–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou S, Xiong M, Dai G, Yu L, Zhang Z, Chen J, Guo W. MicroRNA-192-5p suppresses the initiation and progression of osteosarcoma by targeting USP1. Oncol Lett. 2018;15(5):6947–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Yuan P, Feng Z, Huang H, Wang G, Chen Z, Xu G, Xie Z, Jie Z, Zhao X, Ma Q, Wang S, Shen Y, Huang Y, Han Y, Ye H, Wang J, Shi P, Sun X. USP1 inhibition suppresses the progression of osteosarcoma via destabilizing TAZ. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18(8):3122–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Song B, Jiang Y, Jiang Y, Lin Y, Liu J. ML323 suppresses the progression of ovarian cancer via regulating USP1-mediated cell cycle. Front Genet. 2022;13: 917481.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Pan Y, Tang Y, Gu H, Ge W. Ubiquitin modification in osteogenic differentiation and bone formation: from mechanisms to clinical significance. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1033223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liang Q, Dexheimer TS, Zhang P, Rosenthal AS, Villamil MA, You C, Zhang Q, Chen J, Ott CA, Sun H, Luci DK, Yuan B, Simeonov A, Jadhav A, Xiao H, Wang Y, Maloney DJ, Zhuang Z. A selective USP1-UAF1 inhibitor links deubiquitination to DNA damage responses. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(4):298–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Niu Z, Li X, Feng S, Huang Q, Zhuang T, Yan C, Qian H, Ding Y, Zhu J, Xu W. The deubiquitinating enzyme USP1 modulates ERalpha and modulates breast cancer progression. J Cancer. 2020;11(23):6992–7000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Liao Y, Shao Z, Liu Y, Xia X, Deng Y, Yu C, Sun W, Kong W, He X, Liu F, Guo Z, Chen G, Tang D, Gan H, Liu J, Huang H. USP1-dependent RPS16 protein stability drives growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhou F, Li F, Fang P, Dai T, Yang B, van Dam H, Jia J, Zheng M, Zhang L. Ubiquitin-specific protease 4 antagonizes osteoblast differentiation through dishevelled. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(10):1888–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li C, Qiu M, Chang L, Qi J, Zhang L, Ryffel B, Deng L. The osteoprotective role of USP26 in coordinating bone formation and resorption. Cell Death Differ. 2022;29(6):1123–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo YC, Wang MY, Zhang SW, Wu YS, Zhou CC, Zheng RX, Shao B, Wang Y, Xie L, Liu WQ, Sun NY, Jing JJ, Ye L, Chen QM, Yuan Q. Ubiquitin-specific protease USP34 controls osteogenic differentiation and bone formation by regulating BMP2 signaling. EMBO J. 2018;37(20):e99398.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Shirakawa J, Harada H, Noda M, Ezura Y. PTH-induced osteoblast proliferation requires upregulation of the ubiquitin-specific peptidase 2 (Usp2) expression. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;98(3):306–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin Z, Rios HF, Volk SL, Sugai JV, Jin Q, Giannobile WV. Gene expression dynamics during bone healing and osseointegration. J Periodontol. 2011;82(7):1007–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Arantes RV, Cestari TM, Viscelli BA, Dionisio TJ, Garlet GP, Santos CF, de Assis GF, Taga R. Meloxicam temporally inhibits the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1 and VEGFR-2 during alveolar bone repair in rats. J Periodontol. 2015;86(1):162–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Garlet GP, Horwat R, Ray HL Jr, Garlet TP, Silveira EM, Campanelli AP, Trombone AP, Letra A, Silva RM. Expression analysis of wound healing genes in human periapical granulomas of progressive and stable nature. J Endod. 2012;38(2):185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Upton Z, Cuttle L, Noble A, Kempf M, Topping G, Malda J, Xie Y, Mill J, Harkin DG, Kravchuk O, Leavesley DI, Kimble RM. Vitronectin: growth factor complexes hold potential as a wound therapy approach. J Invest Dermatol. 2008;128(6):1535–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang W, Duan N, Zhang Q, Song T, Li Z, Chen X, Wang K. The intracellular NADH level regulates atrophic nonunion pathogenesis through the CtBP2-p300-Runx2 transcriptional complex. Int J Biol Sci. 2018;14(14):2023–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Gong Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang L, Wan L, Zu Y, Li C, Wang X, Cui ZK. Paracrine effects of recombinant human adiponectin promote bone regeneration. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 762335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Schwetz V, Pieber T, Obermayer-Pietsch B. The endocrine role of the skeleton: background and clinical evidence. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166(6):959–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang JS, Mazur CM, Wein MN. Sclerostin and osteocalcin: candidate bone-produced hormones. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12: 584147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Aiello EN, Esposito A, Giannone I, Diana L, Appollonio I, Bolognini N. Telephone interview for cognitive status (TICS): Italian adaptation, psychometrics and diagnostics. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(5):3071–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhiqiang Z, Qinghui Y, Yongqiang Z, Jian Z, Xin Z, Haiying M, Yuepeng G. USP1 regulates AKT phosphorylation by modulating the stability of PHLPP1 in lung cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138(7):1231–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. He S, Guan Y, Wu Y, Zhu L, Yan B, Honda H, Yang J, Liu W. DEC1 deficiency results in accelerated osteopenia through enhanced DKK1 activity and attenuated PI3KCA/Akt/GSK3beta signaling. Metabolism. 2021;118: 154730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Zheng H, Liu J, Tycksen E, Nunley R, McAlinden A. MicroRNA-181a/b-1 over-expression enhances osteogenesis by modulating PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling and mitochondrial metabolism. Bone. 2019;123:92–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Liang Y, Zhou R, Liu X, You L, Chen C, Ye X, Wei W, Liu J, Dai J, Li K, Zhao X. Leukemia inhibitory factor facilitates self-renewal and differentiation and attenuates oxidative stress of BMSCs by activating PI3K/AKT signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5772509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang Z, Zhang X, Zhao D, Liu B, Wang B, Yu W, Li J, Yu X, Cao F, Zheng G, Zhang Y, Liu Y. TGF-beta1 promotes the osteoinduction of human osteoblasts via the PI3K/AKT/mTOR/S6K1 signalling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(5):3505–18.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Xu J, Fu L, Bai J, Zhong H, Kuang Z, Zhou C, Hu B, Ni L, Ying L, Chen E, Zhang W, Wu J, Xue D, Li W, Pan Z. Low-dose IL-34 has no effect on osteoclastogenesis but promotes osteogenesis of hBMSCs partly via activation of the PI3K/AKT and ERK signaling pathways. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12(1):268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Ye Y, Pringle LM, Lau AW, Riquelme DN, Wang H, Jiang T, Lev D, Welman A, Blobel GA, Oliveira AM, Chou MM. TRE17/USP6 oncogene translocated in aneurysmal bone cyst induces matrix metalloproteinase production via activation of NF-kappaB. Oncogene. 2010;29(25):3619–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. (Grant Number 81672161).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Microscopic Repair and Reconstruction Department of Hand and Foot, Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230022, Anhui Province, China

    Jun Huang, Hongxiang Zhou, Liang He, Lin Zhong & Ding Zhou

  2. Department of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, No. 218, Jixi Road, Hefei, 230022, Anhui Province, China

    Zongsheng Yin

Authors
  1. Jun Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongxiang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lin Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ding Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zongsheng Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JH and ZY contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by JH, HZ, LH, LZ and DZ. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jun Huang and it was revised by Zongsheng Yin. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zongsheng Yin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work was performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, and it received the institutional ethics committee approval and followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Animal experiments were performed in strict accordance with the Guideline for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Experimental Animals Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J., Zhou, H., He, L. et al. The promotive role of USP1 inhibition in coordinating osteogenic differentiation and fracture healing during nonunion. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 152 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03594-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03594-y

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X