Skip to main content

Advertisement

Growth factor-mediated augmentation of long bones: evaluation of a BMP-7 loaded thermoresponsive hydrogel in a murine femoral intramedullary injection model

Article metrics

  • 270 Accesses

Abstract

Background

Due to our aging population, an increase in proximal femur fractures can be expected, which is associated with impaired activities of daily living and a high risk of mortality. These patients are also at a high risk to suffer a secondary osteoporosis-related fracture on the contralateral hip. In this context, growth factors could open the field for regenerative approaches, as it is known that, i.e., the growth factor BMP-7 (bone morphogenetic protein 7) is a potent stimulator of osteogenesis. Local prophylactic augmentation of the proximal femur with a BMP-7 loaded thermoresponsive hydrogel during index surgery of an osteoporotic fracture could be suitable to reduce the risk of further osteoporosis-associated secondary fractures. The present study therefore aims to test the hypothesis if a BMP-7 augmented hydrogel is an applicable carrier for the augmentation of non-fractured proximal femurs. Furthermore, it needs to be shown that the minimally invasive injection of a hydrogel into the mouse femur is technically feasible.

Methods

In this study, male C57BL/6 mice (n = 36) received a unilateral femoral intramedullary injection of either 100 μl saline, 100 μl 1,4 Butan-Diisocyanat (BDI)-hydrogel, or 100 μl hydrogel loaded with 1 μg of bone morphogenetic protein 7. Mice were sacrificed 4 and 12 weeks later. The femora were submitted to high-resolution X-ray tomography and subsequent histological examination.

Results

Analysis of normalized CtBMD (Cortical bone mineral density) as obtained by X-ray micro-computed tomography analysis revealed significant differences depending on the duration of treatment (4 vs 12 weeks; p < 0.05). Furthermore, within different anatomically defined regions of interest, significant associations between normalized TbN (trabecular number) and BV/TV (percent bone volume) were noted. Histology indicated no signs of inflammation and no signs of necrosis and there were no cartilage damages, no new bone formations, or new cartilage tissues, while BMP-7 was readily detectable in all of the samples.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the murine femoral intramedullary injection model appears to be feasible and worth to be used in subsequent studies that are directed to examine the therapeutic potential of BMP-7 loaded BDI-hydrogel. Although we were unable to detect any significant osseous effects arising from the mode or duration of treatment in the present trial, the effect of different concentrations and duration of treatment in an osteoporotic model appears of interest for further experiments to reach translation into clinic and open new strategies of growth factor-mediated augmentation.

Background

In older adults, osteoporosis is the most common disease of the bone and will acquire increasing importance due to the demographic changes of our aging population [1]. Up to 27% of patients with a diagnosed osteoporosis already sustained a fracture [2]. Without any medicamentous therapy, patients with multiple osteoporosis-associated fractures will sustain in up to 85% another fracture [2]. The proximal femur fracture is one of the most common osteoporosis-associated fractures and often the consequence of an untreated osteoporosis [3]. It is known that for patients with an osteoporosis-associated femoral fracture the risk of sustaining a secondary fracture of the contralateral side is between 2.3 and 10.6% [4, 5]. Mortality of patients with a secondary femoral fracture during the first year after fracture is significantly increased compared to unilateral femoral fractures and ranges from 8.4 to 36% [5]. Sawahla et al. described that in two thirds of patients with secondary femoral fracture, the second fracture was at the corresponding anatomical location and that approximately 70% of second fractures occurred within 3 years [6].

Therefore, approaches for prophylaxis of secondary fractures should have the aim to counteract these developments. Current prevention measures aim at a strict compliance of the patients concerning medicamentous and non-medicamentous therapies, which is often difficult because of comorbidities such as cognitive disorders or dementia [7]. Local osteo-enhancement procedures as mentioned in the new “European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women” could offer an alternative treatment for this problem [8]. These procedures comprise a minimal-invasive injection of a resorbable synthetic bone graft substitute, containing a proprietary triphasic calcium sulphate/calcium phosphate implant in the femoral neck, which leads to an increase of femoral BMD (bone mineral density) [8].

Strengthening the femoral neck with a thermosensitive, biocompatible material such as a hydrogel loaded with the growth factor BMP-7 could provide another opportunity.

Hydrogels are intensively investigated as carriers for biologicals in the context of tissue engineering [9, 10]. A wide used material on which many hydrogels are based on is Pluronic. Pluronic is a thermosensitive polymer, which is gelling when exceeding a critical solution temperature (LCST) [11, 12]. Furthermore, different chain extenders can modify Pluronic and its chemical properties. In this study, a Pluronic (P123)-based hydrogel (Europe Patent number: WO2014095915A1) was used, which was extended by butane diisocyanate (BDI) to have the desired properties, e.g., thermosensitivity. As shown in previous experiments by some of the authors, 1,4-butane diisocyanate extended triblock copolymer Pluronic P 123 (BDI-hydrogel) gels at body temperature and offers good biocompatibility and improved cell survival under in vitro and in vivo circumstances [12]. Its bioresorbable characteristics further provide an effective carrier for the subsequent release of growth factors.

BMPs are clinically used because of their potent osteoinductive stimulation [13]. This stimulation of bone formation becomes especially relevant under certain conditions, e.g., osteoporosis and fracture healing [14, 15]. BMP-7 gained approval for local treatment of distinct bone-related conditions, e.g., posterolateral spinal lumbar fusion and complicated permanent tibial pseudarthrosis [9, 10]. However, utilization of BMP-7 as a therapeutic drug poses a variety of problems. On the one hand, application has to be restricted to the desired site of action in order to avoid ectopic mineralization, and on the other hand biological half-life is in the range of a few minutes only [16]. Thus, either repeated applications are required or the BMP-7 has to be trapped inside a biodegradable matrix with subsequent slow and long-lasting release of the bioactive growth factor at the predefined site of action [17].

The present study therefore aims to test the hypothesis if a BMP-7 augmented hydrogel is an applicable carrier for the augmentation of non-fractured proximal femurs. To test this hypothesis, the murine femoral intramedullary injection model was used in the present pilot study (proof of principle) to gain knowledge on the biocompatibility and features of a BMP-7-loaded BDI-hydrogel in vivo.

Methods

Preparation of butane-diisocyanate hydrogel (BDI-hydrogel)

The synthesis of the BDI extended, thermoresponsive Pluronic 123 polymer has been previously described by Volkmer et al. [12]. For preparation of the hydrogel, 1 g of autoclaved polymer was dissolved under aseptic conditions in 9 ml of minimum essential medium alpha with l-glutamin (MEMalpha; Invitrogen, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma, Germany) and 40 IU/ml penicillin/streptomycin (PAA Laboratories GmbH, Austria), stored at 4 °C and gently stirred once per day [12]. At the day of surgery, rhBMP-7 (Olympus Biotech Corporation, Mt Waverley, Victoria, Australia) was added to yield a final concentration of 100 μg/ml rhBMP-7, and the solution was stored on ice until application.

Animals and surgical procedure

Thirty-six male C57BL/6 mice were delivered at 6 months of age from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Sulzfeld, Germany), and all animals had access to maintenance diet and water ad libitum. Mice were kept in individually ventilated standard cages (6 mice per cage) in a temperature-controlled room on a 12-h light/dark cycle. After 2 weeks of acclimatization, mice were randomly allocated to three experimental groups, i.e., femoral intramedullary injection of either 100 μl saline (Sham group, n = 12), 100 μl BDI-hydrogel (Hydrogel group, n = 12), or 100 μl BMP-7 loaded BDI-hydrogel (BMP-7 group, n = 12) with scheduled observation periods of 4 and 12 weeks. Surgery was done at the right hindlimb in all animals. Anesthesia was achieved by intraperitoneal injection of fentanyl (0.05 mg/kg body weight (BW)), midazolam (5 mg/kg BW), and medetomidine (0.5 mg/kg BW). Surgery was performed as described by Zilber et al. except utilization of a dental drill to get access to the intramedullary cavity [18]. Thus, surgical approach was provided via a 5-mm anterolateral skin incision to expose the patellar tendon. Via blunt dissection of the tendon surrounding tissue and joint capsule, the distal aspect of the femoral shaft was then exposed. The intramedullary space was cannulated with a 29G needle and the compounds mentioned above were delivered to the proximal femur by means of a syringe. The incision was closed using a 4-0 Ethilon skin suture (Ethicon, Sommerville, NJ, USA), and anesthesia was antagonized with naloxon (1.2 mg/kg BW), flumazenil (0.5 mg/kg BW), and atipamezol (2.5 mg/kg BW) dissolved in 0.9% saline, each. Animals were placed under a red light until fully awake.

At the end of the scheduled observation period, animals were sacrificed in a CO2 chamber. Both hindlimbs were extracted; the femora were freed from muscle and adjacent tissue and immediately fixed in 10% formalin for 24 h. Thereafter, bones were incubated in 70% ethanol (24 h) and stored in 80% ethanol until further analysis.

High-resolution three-dimensional X-ray tomography (μCT) of the femora

A high-resolution μCT-imaging system (Skyscan 1076, Bruker, Kontich, Belgium) was utilized essentially as described [19]. Briefly, femora were rinsed with distilled water twice, equilibrated with 0.9% NaCl (4 °C overnight), and wrapped in cling film, and up to three bones were placed sequentially into cylindrical polypropylene tubes. The tubes were held by means of a Styrofoam bedding with the long axis of the bones orientated orthogonally to the X-ray beam. The instrumental settings chosen for scanning, reconstruction (NRecon, Bruker), and image analysis (CTAn, Bruker) are given in Table 1. Distinct volumes of interest (VOI) for analysis of cortical (cort) and trabecular (trab) bone were defined relative to anatomical landmarks (Fig. 1). In particular, cortical and trabecular bone were investigated at the diaphysis (cort), the distal femur (trab), the proximal metaphysis (cort, trab), and femoral neck (cort, trab), respectively. For analysis of cortical bone, a manually drawn bagel-like region of interest (ROI) was defined whereas manually drawn polygonal ROIs were used for analysis of trabecular bone. Size and shape of the polygonal ROIs were adjusted manually every 10–30 transverse slices and adjusted automatically by the software over the entire VOI (Fig. 1). All ROI interpolations were checked visually before starting the CTAnalyzer software. Parameters used for the characterization of cortical and trabecular bone are given in Table 2 [20]. For calculation of bone mineral density, calcium-hydroxyapatite (CaHA) phantom rods containing 0.25 and 0.75 g CaHA/cm3 were used for calibration of the instrument [19].

Table 1 Setting of the μCT for scanning, reconstruction, and analysis of bone microarchitecture
Fig. 1
figure1

Schematic representation of the VOIs selected for analysis of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture (a), the distal growth plate as an example of an anatomical landmark (b), representative images of the manually drawn ROIs for analysis of cortical (c), and trabecular (d) bone. The distal growth plate and the division into greater trochanter and femoral neck served as internal references, i.e., positioning of the VOIs for analysis of the distal and proximal femora as well as the femoral neck. For examination of the distal femur (1), VOI started 50 slices apart from the growth plate (b) and consisted of 100 slices. The VOI in the region diaphysis (2) started 400 slices apart from the growth plate and consisted of 100 slices. In case of the proximal femur (3), trab and cort VOIs consisted of 80 slices each and started 50 slices distal from the division into greater trochanter and femoral neck. For analysis of the femoral neck (4), cort VOI and trab VOI included 20 slices each and an offset of 15 slices from the division into greater trochanter and femoral neck was used

Table 2 Parameters used for the description of cortical and trabecular bone

Preparation of bone samples for histological and immunohistochemical analysis

Methyl methacrylate embedding of mineralized bone

Per group, two pairs of randomly selected femora were embedded in methyl methacrylate (MMA, Technovit 9100 Heraeus-Kulzer, Wehrheim, Germany) and subsequently used for immunohistochemical evaluation. Embedding in MMA and preparation of the required solutions were according to the protocol of the manufacturer except that the procedure was performed manually [21]. Briefly, intact femora were dehydrated with increasing amounts of ethanol (70%, 80%, 90%, 96%, each for 24 h at 4 °C followed by two incubations in 100% ethanol (each 12 h at 4 °C) and defatting with xylene (2 × 12 h at 4 °C). Subsequently, the tissue was sequentially soaked with a 1:1 mixture of monomer and xylene (24 h at 4°), with monomer containing hardener 1 at a concentration of 3.4 mg/ml (24 h at 4 °C), with destabilized monomer containing 0.08 g/ml of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and 4 mg/ml of hardener 1 (3–5 days at 4 °C). Finally, each sample was placed in a labeled Teflon-made polymerization mold and covered completely with polymerization solution (approx. 2 ml per sample), i.e., 10 volumes of destabilized monomer containing PMMA (0.16 g/ml) and hardener 1 (10 mg/ml) were mixed with 1 volume of destabilized monomer containing 0.08 ml/ml hardener 2 and 0.04 ml/ml regulator immediately before use. To ensure optimal conditions for polymerization, a mild vacuum was applied prior to closing the molds. Subsequently, the samples were stored at − 7 °C until polymerization was completed (usually 3–5 days). Blocks were trimmed and pre-cut in the area of interest with a diamond saw (Buehler Isomet 1000, Esslingen am Neckar, Germany). The surface of the blocks were polished and mounted on Leica Xtra adhesive slides with a special cyanacrylic glue (LLS ROWIAK LaserLabSolutions, Hannover, Germany). Ten-micrometer sections were prepared with a laser microtome (TissueSurgeon, LLS ROWIAK LaserLabSolutions, Hannover, Germany).

Immunohistochemistry

For immunohistochemical analysis of mineralized bone, sections were deplasted with methylmethacrylate (24 h) followed by overnight incubation with Shandon xylene substitute (Fisher Scientific, Schwerte, Germany). Subsequently, the slides were rinsed with distilled water, incubated in 2 M HCl (1 h, 37 °C), rinsed again with distilled water and 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 3.7) prior to trypsinization (0.5 mg/ml in 1% CaCl2; 30 min, 37 °C) for antigen demasking. Afterwards, the slides were rinsed with 0.1 M Tris-HCl and endogeneous peroxidase was blocked by incubation with 10% H2O2 (30 min, room temperature). For blocking of unspecific binding sites and visualization of bound antibody, the Vectastain Kit Elite Universal (Vector Laboratories Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA) was used according to the instructions of the manufacturer and essentially as described previously [22]. For detection of BMP-7, slides were incubated (4°, overnight) with the protein-A purified polyclonal rabbit-anti-BMP-7 antiserum (ab#56023, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), which was diluted with blocking serum to reach a concentration of 5 μg/ml. Paraffin-embedded samples from healthy human kidney served as controls.

Paraffin embedding and histochemical analysis of demineralized bone

Per group, two randomly selected pairs of femora were decalcified manually (Usedecalc®, Medite, Burgdorf Germany) at 4 °C for a total of 2 weeks with daily changes of the decalcification solution. Finally, the samples were washed with deionized water, dehydrated, cleared, and embedded in paraffin. Tissue samples (5-μm sagittal sections mounted on Superfrost® slides) were prepared for Masson-Goldner trichrome staining essentially as described previously [22, 23].

Statistical analysis

All data were processed using IBM SPSS Advanced Statistics 22.0. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for the indicated number of samples. For each animal, an individual left-to-right normalization of the measurements obtained from femora was performed for quantitative analysis of bone microarchitecture.

Parameters describing trabecular and cortical bone (Table 2) were analyzed and compared with repeated measure ANOVA for factors “treatment” (i.e., sham, BDI-hydrogel, and BMP-7) and “duration” (i.e., 4 or 12 weeks) with post hoc least significant difference (LSD) test, as well as for the within-subjects factor “localization” (i.e., diaphysis (cort), distal femur (trab), proximal femur, and femoral neck) with deviation-contrast, employing a general linear model for repeated measures (GLM-Rep), if normality was given. Here, estimated marginal means (EMMs) with their standard errors (SEEMM) and the respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Spearman Rho (R) test was used to analyze the correlation between normalized parameters describing trabecular and cortical bone, respectively.

In case of non-normality, nonparametric analysis of variance was performed employing the Kruskal-Wallis test for unpaired samples and the Friedman test for paired data, respectively. If appropriate, subgroups were tested pairwise using the Mann-Whitney U test (unpaired samples) or the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test (paired data), two-sided.

Normal distribution of measurements was checked using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. P < 0.05 (Bonferroni-adjusted for multiple testing) was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Animals

The postoperative course was uneventful; wound healing was without any complications and no animal had to be taken out of the experiment before the end of the observation period.

Analysis of bone microarchitecture

For each mouse, characteristics of cortical and trabecular microarchitecture were determined at the distal and proximal femur as well as the femoral neck of both hindlimbs. Normalized data on distinct features of bone microarchitecture relative to predefined anatomical landmarks together with data on treatment and duration are available. In order to investigate intrasubject interactions between these variables, the GLM-Rep model was applied. The analysis revealed that normalized TbN (trabecular number), TbTh (trabecular thickness), and the degree of anisotropy were virtually unrelated to the region investigated and were even not affected by the mode or duration of therapy (Additional file 1: Table S1). By contrast, normalized TbSp (trabecular separation) at the femoral neck was significantly lower compared to the distal and proximal femur, respectively (Table 3). While normalized trabecular BMD (bone mineral density) determined at the distal femur and femoral neck were almost comparable, it was significantly lower at the proximal femur (Table 3). However, neither normalized TbSp nor normalized trabecular BMD was affected by mode or duration of treatment.

Table 3 Normalized TbSp, normalized TbBMD, and normalized BAr/TAr relative to the investigated part of the femur. Estimated marginal means (EMM) with their 95% CIs from GLM-Rep model are reported. Superscripts denote significant differences between groups labeled identically (*p < 0.05; **, ##p < 0.01)

Within each of the anatomically defined regions, significant associations between normalized TbN and either normalized BV/TV (percent bone volume) or normalized BMD as well as between normalized BV/TV and normalized BMD were noted (Fig. 2). Furthermore, normalized BMD determined at the distal and proximal femur were significantly associated (R = 0.61, p < 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure2

Significant association of normalized TbN (a) and normalized BMD (b) with normalized BV/TV determined at the femoral neck (red triangle), proximal (blue circle) and distal femur (white circle), respectively. Spearman’s rank coefficients of correlation: femoral neck, R = 0.94 (a) and R = 0.79 (b); proximal femur, R = 0.88 (a) and R = 0.90 (b); distal femur, R = 0.95 (a) and R = 0.88 (b); each p < 0.001

In case of cortical bone, the normalized BAr/TAr (bone area/tissue area) at the femoral neck was significantly higher compared to those determined either at the diaphysis or at the proximal femur (Table 3). Again, there were no effects related to the mode or duration of treatment. While the normalized CtBMD (Cortical bone mineral density) was unrelated to the region investigated or the mode of therapy, the linear model revealed a significant effect depending on the duration of treatment (4 vs 12 weeks, 1.001 (0.978, 1.023) vs. 0.988 (0.966, 1.010); p < 0.05). This effect is even more pronounced when the effects of localization and mode of treatment are not considered at all, i.e., the U test revealed p = 0.002. Correlation analysis revealed a positive association between the normalized CtBMD determined at either anatomical region (diaphysis and proximal femur, R = 0.75; diaphysis and femoral neck, R = 0.71; proximal femur and femoral neck, R = 0.64; each p < 0.001).

Histological analysis and detection of BMP-7

Histological analysis of demineralized paraffin-embedded bones did not reveal any signs of inflammation, such as clusters of granulocytes or inflammation foci. Neither, we could detect differences related to the mode or duration of the treatments (Fig. 3). No signs of necrosis could be detected throughout all specimens. Also, there were no cartilage damages, no new bone formations or new cartilage tissues.

Fig. 3
figure3

Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE)-stained sagittal sections of demineralized femora obtained 4 and 12 weeks after surgery. Femora on the right side were treated with either BMP-7 loaded BDI-hydrogel, intramedullary application of plain BDI hydrogel or saline (SHAM), the left sides serve as untreated controls. (Scale bar, 100 μm)

BMP-7 was readily detectable in all of the samples investigated (Fig. 4). In particular, there were no differences regarding the intensity of BMP-7-specific signals with respect to mode and duration of treatment.

Fig. 4
figure4

Immunohistochemical detection of BMP-7 in mineralized femora obtained 4 weeks (left column) and 12 weeks (right column) after intramedullary application of BMP-7 loaded BDI-hydrogel, plain BDI-hydrogel, or saline (SHAM) (Scale bar, 100 μm)

Discussion

Prophylactic augmentation of the proximal femur could offer an alternative strategy to reduce the high risk of secondary hip fractures associated with an underlying osteoporosis. This technique could be applied in non-fractured proximal femurs of patients undergoing surgery due to an osteoporosis-related fracture. While augmentation techniques available at present are based on either inert materials such as PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) or calcium-phosphate materials, the use of growth factor-augmented hydrogels could offer a new regenerative approach.

In order to evaluate the potential of a BMP-7-augmented hydrogel the present study was designed and conducted as a pilot (proof of concept) and with the vision for future utilization of a BMP-7-loaded hydrogel for pre-emptive augmentation of the femoral head in osteoporotic patients. A thorough investigation of this concept requires a sequence of well-designed animal experiments, covering all aspects from the feasibility of the surgical approach and biocompatibility up to toxicological and finally pharmacological effects. Our experiment was the first in this chain of events although no osteoporotic animals were used in the present in vivo analysis, we can clearly state that the mice tolerated the minimal-invasive surgical procedure well including assessment of the intramedullary cavity by means of a drill and concomitant application of the compounds. All mice were operated by the same surgeon and the postoperative recovery was without any complications. Neither μCT imaging nor histochemical investigation revealed any signs of surgically induced bone defects, inflammatory or reactive bone marrow changes secondary to the intervention.

Within the femur, we characterized bone microarchitecture by means of μCT imaging at four distinct anatomical regions, i.e. at the distal femur, the diaphysis, the proximal femur, and the femoral neck, and per mouse normalized data were generated. It is still a matter of discussion which part of the femur is best suited to characterize bone microarchitecture [24]. Furthermore, a general linear model for repeated measures was used to account for the factors “treatment” and “duration” as well as the within-subjects factor “localization”. This approach revealed that localization is relevant only for some of the parameters describing cancellous and cortical bone, respectively. In particular, BMD was lower at the proximal femur compared to the femoral neck or the distal femur, while TbSp was lowest and BAr/TAr was highest at the femoral neck. Both mineral density and trabecular microarchitecture, i.e., the spatial arrangement, contribute to stability. Results from the correlation analysis also point to a strong interaction between these two features. Furthermore, CtBMD decreased with aging. However, we could not detect increased bone formation secondary to local BMP-7 application.

In the present study, we applied for the first time (to the best of our knowledge) 100 μl pure or BMP-7-loaded BDI-hydrogel into the murine femoral cavity in vivo. Previous studies have shown that the BMP dosage is of importance with regards to osteoinduction. Yet, in literature, there is limited data on the concentration of BMP-7, whereas more information has been published on the concentration of BMP-2, which is why the choice of doses also considered reports on BMP-2 [25]. In the present study, we selected an amount of 100 μg/ml rhBMP-7. This concentration appeared reasonable in accordance to previous investigations in a small-animal study reported by Bosemark et al. in which a concentration of 25 μg BMP-7 was used [26]. Furthermore, in another dose-response study on BMP-7 mediated fracture healing utilizing a rat femoral critical size defect stabilized with a plate, the authors reported that a concentration of 50 μg was sufficient to induce bone healing [27].

A clear limitation of the experimental setup is the application of hydrogel through the distal femur. Although the hydrogel was applied as close to the femoral neck as possible, this does not guarantee that the hypothesized effects are restricted to the femoral neck. Further experiments by some of the authors on the properties of the hydrogel used compared to different hydrogels such as hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) and hydrogenated diphenylmethane diisocyanate (H12 MDI) showed that the BDI hydrogel as used in the present case provides the highest penetration resistance, which is of importance for injection of the biomaterial [12]. Also, previous studies of our group with cadaveric mice clearly showed a homogeneous distribution of the BDI-hydrogel within the femoral cavity (Additional file 2).

Immunohistochemistry for detection of BMP-7 further showed that BMP-7 related signals were comparable between samples and most likely not related to the specific treatments. These findings are well in line with the data obtained by μCT imaging. Yet, in order to discriminate between exogenous and endogenous BMP-7, a tagged form, e.g., GFP-l or His-tagged rhBMP7 should be used in the future. Such an approach requires an additional set of controls and one has to ensure that the label itself does not interfere with the desired action of the growth factor and/or the designated analytical procedures.

Contrasting to our expectations, we were unable to detect any change in terms of bone morphology and mineralization, which suggests that further studies are necessary towards an optimization of the BMP-7 concentration. Previous unpublished in vitro analysis by our group showed a continuous release of rhBMP-7 from the gel over a period of 38 days. In light of these in vitro results, we expected a higher content of BMP-7 in the BMP-7-treated bones and an osteoinductive effect to be detected via μCT analysis.

Under physiological conditions, bone formation and degradation are well-balanced [28, 29]. Thus, one might not necessarily expect that the local application even of an extremely potent growth factor like BMP-7 will be able to overwrite the system of checks and balances in an otherwise healthy system. Therefore, this approach might reveal more robust results in a pathological rodent model, e.g., in a model of osteoporosis. Furthermore, we cannot rule out that we missed the peak, i.e., that there was an acute and intermediate effect within the first 1 or 2 weeks after surgery. Thus, for further analysis of this approach, a mouse model after induction of osteoporosis by for example orchiectomy or even with manifested disease appears to be more appropriate and represents the next logical step. Furthermore, by the time when the experiments were planned and performed, BMP-7 was provided on the market by Olympus Biotech Corp., which later in 2014, discontinued the sale of its products. Considering the recent market development with BMP-2 still on the market, an investigation of a BMP-2 augmented hydrogel would be desirable. The gel could also be loaded with other osteoinductive substances, e.g., anti-sclerostin antibodies.

Conclusions

Augmentation techniques of the proximal femur could open the door for alternative strategies to reduce the high risk of secondary hip fractures associated with an underlying osteoporosis. Thus, growth factors such as BMP-7 could offer a promising opportunity to introduce osteoinductive properties in a resorbable hydrogel-based material. As evaluated in the present study, the murine retrograde injection model of the femoral bone appears to be feasible for further in vivo studies on the therapeutic potential on growth factor loaded BDI-hydrogel for preventing secondary osteoporotic femoral fractures in the future. Additional studies will be necessary to reach translation to clinical routine.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials were presented in the main paper and supplements attached.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

BAr/Tar:

Quantification of the trabecular bone fraction bone area/total area

BDI:

Butan-Diisocyanat-hydrogel

BMD:

Bone mineral density

BMP-7:

Bone morphogenetic protein-7

BV/TV:

Percent bone volume

BW:

Body weight

CaHA:

Calcium-hydroxyapatite

CtBMD:

Cortical bone mineral density

EMMs:

Estimated marginal means

GLM-Rep:

General linear model for repeated measures

MMA:

Methyl methacrylate

PMMA:

Polymethylmethacrylate

ROI:

Region of interest

SD:

Standard deviation

TbN:

Trabecular number

TbSp:

Trabecular separation

TbTh:

Trabecular thickness

VOI:

Volumes of interest

μCT:

X-ray micro-computed tomography

References

  1. 1.

    Richards JB, Zheng H-F, Spector TD. Genetics of osteoporosis from genome-wide association studies: advances and challenges. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:576.

  2. 2.

    Neuerburg C, Schmidmaier R, Schilling S, et al. Identification, diagnostics and guideline conform therapy of osteoporosis (DVO) in trauma patients. Unfallchirurg. 2015;118:913–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-015-0071-2.

  3. 3.

    Peters KM. Osteoporose. Orthop Unfall. 2013;8:403–15 up2date.

  4. 4.

    Fliri L, Sermon A, Wähnert D, et al. Limited V-shaped cement augmentation of the proximal femur to prevent secondary hip fractures. J Biomater Appl. 2013;28:136–43.

  5. 5.

    Drew S, Judge A, May C, et al. Implementation of secondary fracture prevention services after hip fracture: a qualitative study using extended Normalization Process Theory. Implement Sci. 2015;10:57.

  6. 6.

    Sawalha S, Parker M. Characteristics and outcome in patients sustaining a second contralateral fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:102–6.

  7. 7.

    Gold DT. Patients who do not take their osteoporosis medications: can we help them become compliant? The duration and safety of osteoporosis preatment: Springer; 2016. p. 239–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23639-1_17

  8. 8.

    Kanis J, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30:3–44.

  9. 9.

    Gautschi OP, Frey SP, Zellweger R. Bone morphogenetic proteins in clinical applications. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:626–31.

  10. 10.

    Eschler A, Roepenack P, Herlyn PKE, et al. Intrabody application of eptotermin alpha enhances bone formation in osteoporotic fractures of the lumbar spine; however, fails to increase biomechanical stability–results of an experimental sheep model. Growth Factors. 2015;33:290–7.

  11. 11.

    Park KM, Lee SY, Joung YK, et al. Thermosensitive chitosan-Pluronic hydrogel as an injectable cell delivery carrier for cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2009;5:1956–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.040.

  12. 12.

    Volkmer E, Leicht U, Moritz M, et al. Poloxamer-based hydrogels hardening at body core temperature as carriers for cell based therapies: in vitro and in vivo analysis. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24:2223–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4966-6.

  13. 13.

    Cheng H, Jiang W, Phillips FM, et al. Osteogenic activity of the fourteen types of human bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:1544–52.

  14. 14.

    Mathavan N, Tagil M, Isaksson H. Do osteoporotic fractures constitute a greater recalcitrant challenge for skeletal regeneration? Investigating the efficacy of BMP-7 and zoledronate treatment of diaphyseal fractures in an open fracture osteoporotic rat model. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28:697–707. 2016/11/09. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3771-8.

  15. 15.

    Bosemark P, Isaksson H, McDonald MM, et al. Augmentation of autologous bone graft by a combination of bone morphogenic protein and bisphosphonate increased both callus volume and strength. Acta orthopaedica. 2013;84:106–11. 2013/02/16. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.773123.

  16. 16.

    Begam H, Nandi SK, Kundu B, et al. Strategies for delivering bone morphogenetic protein for bone healing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;70:856–69. 2016/10/25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.074.

  17. 17.

    Betz VM, Betz OB, Rosin T, et al. An expedited approach for sustained delivery of BMP-7 to bone defects using gene activated fragments of subcutaneous fat. J Gene Med. 2016;18(8):199–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.2892.

  18. 18.

    Zilber S, Epstein NJ, Lee SW, et al. Mouse femoral intramedullary injection model: technique and microCT scan validation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;84:286–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30872.

  19. 19.

    Behrendt AK, Kuhla A, Osterberg A, et al. Dietary restriction-induced alterations in bone phenotype: effects of lifelong versus short-term caloric restriction on femoral and vertebral bone in C57BL/6 mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:852–63.

  20. 20.

    Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, et al. Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25:1468–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.141.

  21. 21.

    Yang R, Davies CM, Archer CW, et al. Immunohistochemistry of matrix markers in Technovit 9100 new-embedded undecalcified bone sections. Eur Cell Mater. 2003;6:57–71; discussion 71.

  22. 22.

    Renken C, Fischer DC, Kundt G, et al. Inhibition of mTOR with sirolimus does not attenuate progression of liver and kidney disease in PCK rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:92–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq384.

  23. 23.

    Voigt M, Fischer DC, Rimpau M, et al. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-23 and fetuin-a in calcified carotid atheroma. Histopathology. 2010;56:775–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03547.x.

  24. 24.

    Bagi CM, Berryman E, Moalli MR. Comparative bone anatomy of commonly used laboratory animals: implications for drug discovery. Comp Med. 2011;61:76–85.

  25. 25.

    Zara JN, Siu RK, Zhang X, et al. High doses of bone morphogenetic protein 2 induce structurally abnormal bone and inflammation in vivo. Tissue Eng A. 2011;17:1389–99. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0555.

  26. 26.

    Bosemark P, Perdikouri C, Pelkonen M, et al. The masquelet induced membrane technique with BMP and a synthetic scaffold can heal a rat femoral critical size defect. J Orthop Res : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society. 2015;33:488–95. 2015/02/03. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22815.

  27. 27.

    Williams JC, Maitra S, Anderson MJ, et al. BMP-7 and bone regeneration: evaluation of dose-response in a rodent segmental defect model. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:e336–41. 2015/08/22. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000307.

  28. 28.

    Datta HK, Ng WF, Walker JA, et al. The cell biology of bone metabolism. J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:577–87. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2007.048868.

  29. 29.

    Langdahl B, Ferrari S, Dempster DW. Bone modeling and remodeling: potential as therapeutic targets for the treatment of osteoporosis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2016;8:225–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X16670154.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Zsuzsanna Farkas, Anja Rahn, and Claudia Winkelmann for expert technical assistance.

Funding

The study was supported by the German Osteoporosis Foundation (scholarship for LMM).

Author information

CN, LM, and AMK conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript. IW, ÄG, PKEH, and MMS proofed statistical analysis and provided support during analysis of data. HR, DCF, MMS, and AA supported histomorphometric and μCT analysis of the specimens. WB drafted the article and revised it for important intellectual content. MS designed and supervised experiments, he also drafted the article and revised it for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version.

Correspondence to Carl Neuerburg.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experiments received approval from the local authorities (Regierung Oberbayern; reference number 55.2-1-54-2532-149-13) and were performed in accordance with the accepted principles of the welfare of animals used in science. Consent to participate is not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

MS is currently employed at Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research (NIBR) and is shareholder/owner of Novartis AG and LivImplant GmbH.

IW was an employee at LivImplant GmbH.

The other authors (CN, LMM, AMK, ÄG, MMS, PKEH, HR, WB, AA, DCF) declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Normalized data on trabecular and cortical bone relative to the characteristics of therapy (treatment and duration) and localization of the VOI (mean±SD, n=6 each treatment group). (PDF 34 kb)

Additional file 2:

Toluidine blue-labelled BDI-hydrogel injected into cadaveric femora shows homogenous dispersion of the material in the cavity. (TIFF 2150 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neuerburg, C., Mittlmeier, L.M., Keppler, A.M. et al. Growth factor-mediated augmentation of long bones: evaluation of a BMP-7 loaded thermoresponsive hydrogel in a murine femoral intramedullary injection model. J Orthop Surg Res 14, 297 (2019) doi:10.1186/s13018-019-1315-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Osteoporosis
  • Murine femoral intramedullary injection model
  • Bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP-7)
  • BDI-hydrogel