Skip to main content

Systematic review: preoperative psychological factors and total hip arthroplasty outcomes

Abstract

Background

Total hip arthroplasties (THA) are cost-effective interventions for patients with osteoarthritis refractory to physical therapy or medical management. Most individuals report positive surgical outcomes with reduction in pain and improved joint function. Multiple recent studies demonstrated the influence of patient mental health on surgical success. We sought to determine the relationship between patient preoperative psychological factors and postoperative THA outcomes, specifically pain and function.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews databases were queried using terms “(mental OR psychological OR psychiatric) AND (function OR trait OR state OR predictor OR health) AND (outcome OR success OR recovery OR response) AND total joint arthroplasty).” A total of 21 of 1,286 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the review. All studies were analyzed using GRADE and Risk of Bias criteria.

Results

Overall, compared to cohorts with a normal psychological status, patients with higher objective measures of preoperative depression and anxiety reported increased postoperative pain, decreased functionality and greater complications following THA. Additionally, participants with lower self-efficacy or somatization were found to have worse functional outcomes.

Conclusions

Preoperative depression, anxiety and somatization may negatively impact patient reported postoperative pain, functionality and complications following THA. Surgeons should consider preoperative psychological status when counseling patients regarding expected surgical outcomes.

Level of evidence

3.

Introduction

Total hip arthroplasties (THA) effectively improve quality of life for individuals with end-stage osteoarthritis [1]. Most patients have positive surgical results including improved pain, strength and range of motion. Unfortunately, a subset of individuals undergoing THA report unsatisfactory outcomes not necessarily attributable to operative technique, presurgical pain levels or loss of function [2]. Since the late 1990s, attention has been paid to the role of social and psychological factors in contributing to these suboptimal outcomes [3].

Multiple studies have evaluated the effect of concomitant psychological factors on changes in patient reported outcome measures following THA [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Most commonly, anxiety and depression have been investigated in relation to postoperative pain and function [4, 5, 7,8,9,10, 13,14,15,16, 18,19,20,21, 23, 24]. Attitudinal factors such as self-efficacy, optimism/pessimism, resilience and surgical fear as well as personality traits including self-care and pain catastrophizing have also been studied. Unfortunately, the current literature lacks an updated systematic review evaluating the role of these characteristics on hip pain and function following THA. By reviewing published THA studies, we sought to fill this gap by investigating the impact of patient psychological status on THA outcomes. We hypothesize individuals with worse preoperative mental functional status will have poorer outcomes following THA compared to those with normal psychological function.

Methods

The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed when preparing this manuscript (Additional file 1) [25].

Search strategy

PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched with the following terms through November 12, 2021: (mental OR psychological OR psychiatric) AND (function OR trait OR state OR predictor OR health) AND (outcome OR success OR recovery OR response) AND total joint arthroplasty. We also reviewed reference lists of relevant review articles and included papers.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All randomized or observational cohort studies involving patients 18 years of age or older published in any language that investigated the role of psychological variables as predictors or effect modifiers of outcomes following THA were included. The outcomes of interest included hip pain, physical and psychological function, and complications/adverse events after THA.

Search results were independently reviewed by two individuals. Publication titles and abstracts were screened. Full text was reviewed if more information was needed to determine whether studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Reasons for study exclusion were documented. Reviewer disagreements were resolved by discussion or, when needed, by a third party. References of the included studies were also reviewed for additional sources not found via database searches.

A total of 1,286 publications were screened with 21 meeting inclusion criteria (Additional file 2). The main reasons for study exclusion were lack of preoperative psychological assessments or desired postoperative outcome measures (Fig. 1). A total of 12,925 adult participants (55% female) were included across the 21 papers. All publications were nonrandomized cohort trials (15 prospective, 6 retrospective). A total of 13 studies were conducted in Europe, while the remaining eight were completed in North America.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram of study selection process

Assessment of study quality

The risk of bias of the included nonrandomized cohort studies was assessed by two reviewers using accepted criteria [26]. Each of the possible sources of bias was explicitly judged as being fulfilled (Y), not fulfilled (N) or unknown (?) due to incomplete information or inadequate reporting (Table 1).

Table 1 Risk of bias assessment for observational studies

The risk of bias assessment scores were utilized to determine whether effect size differed by study quality. Studies were divided into two groups based on the number of criteria fulfilled [27]. The high risk of bias group (< 5 criteria fulfilled) included 4 studies, while 17 studies comprised the low risk of bias group (5–7 criteria fulfilled).

Data collection and abstraction

Administration

All relevant papers were exported into Zotero where duplicates were removed and articles were reviewed for inclusion eligibility.

Data extraction

Two reviewers extracted data from the included studies. Publication information such as title, authors, year and country of origin were recorded. Study characteristics including design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, follow-up duration, outcome domains (e.g., pain, function, subsequent complications/adverse events), outcome measures (e.g., HHS, WOMAC, SF-36), description of outcome events and relationship between psychological determinant and outcome domains were tabulated. Patient data such as age, gender, psychological status, cohort composition and psychological variables measured (e.g., depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, etc.) were recorded.

Synthesis methods

GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used to gauge the overall evidence quality of the included studies [28]. We downgraded an initial rating of low quality by one level for serious problems regarding risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness and imprecision [28]. The GRADE assessments were done separately for individual outcome domains and further by outcome measures and follow-up duration.

Results

Due to the heterogeneity of patient populations, variables measured and outcomes used, we could not perform a meta-analysis and instead performed a systematic review, using rigorous and well accepted methods assessing the overall quality and levels of evidence.

Preoperative psychological variables and postoperative pain

Overall, 12 studies reported the association of preoperative psychological variables with postoperative pain following THA [6,7,8, 10, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23]. Most (9/12, 75%) authors confirmed preoperative depression, anxiety or other mental health disorders resulted in increased pain after surgery compared to patients without psychiatric illness. When stratified by follow-up duration, postoperative pain persisted in patients with depression, anxiety or other mental health disorders compared to control subjects (Table 2). No strong relationship was found for personality traits such as optimism or pessimism as well as pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy.

Table 2 Study conclusions

All high risk of bias (2/2) studies demonstrated a significant relationship between a psychological variable and increased pain. Most (8/10) of the studies deemed low risk of bias presented a significant relationship.

The most common study shortcomings were not adjusting for confounders and failing to address patient attrition. Retrospective studies were less likely to account for patient dropout [8, 11, 18, 20, 23].

Preoperative psychological variables and postoperative function

Postoperative function was evaluated in 14 studies [4,5,6,7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21,22,23,24] and decreased in THA recipients with abnormal psychological variables in 12/14 (86%). Depression, anxiety, distress, pessimism, somatization and low self-efficacy were associated with lower functional status after THA. Postoperative functional status remained low when evaluated in the short-, medium- and long-term follow-up periods (Table 2). No relationship was found for mood or personality traits.

Half of the high risk of bias studies (2/4) found a significant impact of psychological variables on function. All low risk of bias studies (10/10) presented a significant association between psychological variables and decreased function.

Rasouli et al. [18] assessed postoperative complications and reported depression and anxiety to be predictors of increased complications following THA, specifically anemia and infection (Table 2).

Jaiswal et al. [12] evaluated postoperative pain and function with a combined WOMAC measure and found mental health impairment to be associated with increased pain and decreased function (Table 2).

GRADE

Evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria for observational studies separately for each outcome measure. All groups began with a low quality of evidence. A total of 14 publications included a functional outcome (Table 3), 12 evaluated pain (Table 4), and one assessed both pain and function (Table 5).

Table 3 GRADE function
Table 4 GRADE pain
Table 5 GRADE pain and function

Overall, low GRADE of evidence was found for the main functional measures (WOMAC PF, SF-36 PCS, HHS) and pain measures (WOMAC pain, VAS) showing preoperative anxiety and depression negatively impact postoperative pain and function. Studies were downgraded primarily due to indirectness between psychological variables and desired outcome measures. Singh et al., which assessed both pain and function, was downgraded because a valid scale was not used to evaluate a postoperative outcome [22]. Rather, participants were asked one question regarding their hip pain and function. Negrini et al. [15] sought to determine the influence of depression and anxiety on gait speed; however, participants included did not have preoperative scores which qualified as abnormal, thus the study was downgraded for indirectness. Lastly, Mercurio et al. [14] was downgraded for failing to provide outcome results for intermediate timepoints.

Discussion

In this systematic review, we investigated the relationship between patient preoperative psychological factors and postoperative THA outcomes. We found preoperative depression and anxiety to be significant predictors of postoperative pain and decreased function. Low self-efficacy was also related to impaired hip function after surgery. All other psychological variables had conflicting results and a smaller sample size in terms of both the number of studies and patients assessed. More trials evaluating the influence of pain catastrophizing, resilience and pessimism could create a clearer picture of the relationship between these psychological variables and THA outcomes. For example, lower resilience in patients with pelvic or extremity fractures has been associated with worse postoperative outcomes and increased opioid consumption [29].

Several earlier reviews have been completed on the topic. A similar 2011 systematic review by Vissers et al. found limited to no evidence that psychological factors predict THA outcomes [30]. However, only nine studies were evaluated with a small overall sample size. Within the last decade, more studies have been conducted linking psychological variables and THA outcomes. In 2018, Bay and colleagues conducted a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of psychological interventions prior to total hip and knee arthroplasties [31]. While only two of seven randomized clinical trials demonstrated a benefit of presurgical interventions, the results may have been skewed since the studies did not specifically target patients based on preoperative psychological status. Additionally, the studies included in the review lacked sufficient sample sizes.

Although THA may be more complicated for those with comorbidities, the surgery remains important for all populations [32]. Despite positive postoperative outcomes for patients with better preoperative psychological status, most studies reported overall improvements in net pain and function after THA regardless of psychological status [5, 9, 11, 19, 23]. Therefore, THA should continue to be performed on all patients who qualify.

Our systematic review has some limitations. First, all included publications were observational trials and several failed to adjust for confounders such as age, sex and preoperative pain or function. Second, the studies relied on self-report questionnaires or patient reported outcomes for the assessment of psychological status and postoperative state. As a result, potential response bias was difficult to account for. Lastly, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis because of study heterogeneity, specifically differing psychological variables, outcomes measures and varied follow-up times. The study also has several strengths. First, we performed a comprehensive search of large databases and subsequently hand-searched reference lists for additional articles. As a result, we likely included all relevant papers on the study topic. Second, data were thoroughly extracted from all included articles to fully understand the scope of the results and cross-checked for accuracy. Third, the PRISMA guidelines were followed ensuring proper conduct and reporting. Lastly, we performed a risk of bias assessment and GRADE assessment which allowed us to account for method quality and evidence consistency for all included studies.

Moving forward, assessing the preoperative psychological status of patients undergoing THA may help physicians manage expectations of surgical outcomes. A recent study by Geng et al. found depressed patients who underwent psychological therapy had significantly improved postoperative pain and function compared to a control group six months after TKA [33]. Therefore, the evidence suggests preoperative assessment of psychological diagnoses for patients undergoing TJA and treatment for underlying disorders can improve outcomes. Future randomized studies investigating the role of preoperative psychological comorbidities on surgical outcomes after THA would provide additional insight on the topic. Lastly, the literature would benefit from further studies to determine whether routinely used outcome metrics in this patient population are sensitive and specific enough to screen for and monitor changes in specific psychological characteristics.

Conclusions

We found preoperative psychological variables, mainly depression and anxiety, were predictive of postoperative pain and function following THA. The findings indicate assessing the psychological status of patients prior to surgery can help both patients and physicians better prepare for potential outcomes of THA. Future studies should investigate whether addressing and treating psychological factors prior to surgery improve postoperative outcomes.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, Koivisto A-M, Blom M, Ryynänen O-P, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:108–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawai T, Kataoka M, Goto K, Kuroda Y, So K, Matsuda S. Patient- and surgery-related factors that affect patient-reported outcomes after total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Med. 2018;7:358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Orbell S, Johnston M, Rowley D, Espley A, Davey P. Cognitive representations of illness and functional and affective adjustment following surgery for osteoarthritis. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:93–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Badura-Brzoza K, Zajac P, Kasperska-Zajac A, Brzoza Z, Matysiakiewicz J, Piegza M, et al. Anxiety and depression and their influence on the quality of life after total hip replacement: preliminary report. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pr. 2008;12:280–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benditz A, Jansen P, Schaible J, Roll C, Grifka J, Gotz J. Psychological factors as risk factors for poor hip function after total hip arthroplasty. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:237–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brembo EA, Kapstad H, Van Dulmen S, Eide H. Role of self-efficacy and social support in short-term recovery after total hip replacement: a prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duivenvoorden T, Vissers MM, Verhaar JA, Busschbach JJ, Gosens T, Bloem RM, et al. Anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study. Osteoar Cartil. 2013;21:1834–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Etcheson JI, Gwam CU, George NE, Virani S, Mont MA, Delanois RE. Patients with major depressive disorder experience increased perception of pain and opioid consumption following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:997–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galea VP, Rojanasopondist P, Ingelsrud LH, Rubash HE, Bragdon C, Huddleston Iii JI, et al. Longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty and predictors of deterioration during follow-up: a seven-year prospective international multicentre study. Bone Jt J. 2019;101-b:768–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassett AL, Marshall E, Bailey AM, Moser S, Clauw DJ, Hooten WM, et al. Changes in anxiety and depression are mediated by changes in pain severity in patients undergoing lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:14–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hossain M, Parfitt DJ, Beard DJ, Darrah C, Nolan J, Murray DW, et al. Pre-operative psychological distress does not adversely affect functional or mental health gain after primary total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2011;21:421–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaiswal P, Railton P, Khong H, Smith C, Powell J. Impact of preoperative mental health status on functional outcome 1 year after total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2019;6:300–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindner M, Nosseir O, Keller-Pliessnig A, Teigelack P, Teufel M, Tagay S. Psychosocial predictors for outcome after total joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mercurio M, Gasparini G, Carbone EA, Galasso O, Segura-Garcia C. Personality traits predict residual pain after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2020;44:1263–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Negrini F, Preti M, Zirone E, Mazziotti D, Biffi M, Pelosi C, et al. The importance of cognitive executive functions in gait recovery after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101:579–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pinto PR, McIntyre T, Araujo-Soares V, Costa P, Ferrero R, Almeida A. A comparison of predictors and intensity of acute postsurgical pain in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Pain Res. 2017;10:1087–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Aguirre U, Lafuente I, Arenaza JC. Predictors of health-related quality-of-life change after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 2009;467:2886–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rasouli MR, Menendez ME, Sayadipour A, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J. Direct cost and complications associated with total joint arthroplasty in patients with preoperative anxiety and depression. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:533–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Riediger W, Doering S, Krismer M. Depression and somatisation influence the outcome of total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2010;34:13–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rolfson O, Dahlberg LE, Nilsson JA, Malchau H, Garellick G. Variables determining outcome in total hip replacement surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2009;91:157–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Salmon P, Hall GM, Peerbhoy D. Influence of the emotional response to surgery on functional recovery during 6 months after hip arthroplasty. J Behav Med. 2001;24:489–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh JA, O’Byrne MM, Colligan RC, Lewallen DG. Pessimistic explanatory style: a psychological risk factor for poor pain and functional outcomes two years after knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2010;92:799–806.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tarakji BA, Wynkoop AT, Srivastava AK, O’Connor EG, Atkinson TS. Improvement in depression and physical health following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2423–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Trinh JQ, Carender CN, An Q, Noiseux NO, Otero JE, Brown TS. Resilience and depression influence clinical outcomes following primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2021;36:1520–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ Br Med J Publ Gr. 2021;372:n71.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gagnier JJ, Morgenstern H, Chess L. Interventions designed to prevent anterior cruciate ligament injuries in adolescents and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1952–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36:666–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Paniagua AR, Cunningham DJ, LaRose MA, Morriss NJ, Gage MJ. Psychological resilience as a predictor of opioid consumption after orthopaedic trauma. Injury. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar JAN, Busschbach JJV, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Reijman M. Psychological factors affecting the outcome of total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41:576–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bay S, Kuster L, McLean N, Byrnes M, Kuster MS. A systematic review of psychological interventions in total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2121-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster J-Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2004;86:963–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Geng X, Wang X, Zhou G, Li F, Li Y, Zhao M, et al. A randomized controlled trial of psychological intervention to improve satisfaction for patients with depression undergoing TKA: a 2-year follow-up. JBJS. 2021;103:567–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

The authors did not receive financial support for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to data collection, analysis and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. O’Connor.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. PRISMA Checklist

Additional file 2

. Summary of characteristics of included studies. Abbreviations: WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index; Pain, pain subscale; PF, physical functioning subscale; SF-36 PCS, Short-Form Health Survey Physical Component Score; HHS, Harris Hip Score; HOOS, Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; PROMIS-10, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10; BPI, Brief Pain Index; BPI-SF, Brief Pain Index - Short Form; OHS, Oxford Hip Score; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; CES-D, Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression; STAI, Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory; RS-11, Resilience Scale; BRS, Brief Resilience Scale; FPI-R, Freiburg Personality Inventory - Revised; GSES, General Self-Efficacy Scale; EQ-5D, EuroQol Five-Dimension Index; SF-36 MHS, Short-Form Health Survey Mental Health Score; BSI, Brief Symptom Inventory; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire; CSQ-RF, Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Revised Form; SFQ, Surgical Fear Questionnaire; LOT-R, Life Orientation Test-Revised; SOMS-2, Screening of Somatoform Disorders; PBQ, Pain Belief Questionnaire; POMS, Profile of Mood States; TCI-R, Temperament and Character Inventory - Revised; MMPI, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory; SF-36 MCS, Short-Form Health Survey Mental Component Score. * indicates missing or incomplete follow-up data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Connor, J.P., Holden, P. & Gagnier, J.J. Systematic review: preoperative psychological factors and total hip arthroplasty outcomes. J Orthop Surg Res 17, 457 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03355-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03355-3

Keywords

  • Total hip arthroplasty
  • Mental health
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Systematic review
  • Operative outcomes