Skip to main content

Table 1 Risk of bias assessment for observational studies

From: Systematic review: preoperative psychological factors and total hip arthroplasty outcomes

 

Was the outcome absent at the start of the study?

Are all members of the cohort equally capable of developing the outcome?

Was the outcome measurement performed in the same manner with similar intensity in the groups being compared?

Were the groups similar at baseline?

Did the authors perform analyses adjusting for known confounders?

Were all the withdrawals and dropsout described and accounted for?

Did the authors describe other possible sources of bias or confounders?

Badura-Brzoza [4]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Benditz [5]

Yes

Yes

Yes

?

No

Yes

Yes

Brembo [6]

Yes

Yes

Yes

?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Duivenvoorden [7]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Etcheson [8]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Galea [9]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Hassett [10]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Hossain [11]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Jaiswal [12]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Lindner [13]

Yes

Yes

Yes

?

No

Yes

Yes

Mercurio [14]

Yes

Yes

Yes

?

No

Yes

Yes

Negrini [15]

Yes

Yes

No

?

No

No

Yes

Pinto [16]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Quintana [17]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Rasouli [18]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Riediger [19]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Rolfson [20]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Salmon [21]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Singh [22]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Tarakji [23]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Trinh [24]

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

  1. Yes this criterion was fulfilled, No this criterion was not fulfilled; ?, it was not possible to determine whether or not the criterion was fulfilled due to underreporting or unclear language