Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Systematic review
  • Open access
  • Published:

Fibula allograft propping as an effective treatment for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 15, Article number: 206 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) causes severe hip dysfunction. Left untreated, 80% of patients experience femoral head collapse, and 65–70% of patients require total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, effective treatment is very important for ONFH.

Objective

To examine the effectiveness of fibula allografting for the treatment of early-stage ONFH

Methods

A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases using “avascular necrosis” or “ischemic necrosis” or “osteonecrosis” and “femoral head” and “fibula*,” and checking the references of primary articles and reviews. Two independent authors completed the study selection separately. We extracted the following details from each article: characteristics of the patients, clinical efficacy evaluation (Harris hip score [HSS], radiographic outcomes, the rate of conversation to total hip arthroplasty [THA], and adverse effects).

Results

A total of 213 articles were selected from PubMed (n = 45), EMBASE (n = 77), Web of Science (n = 203), and other sources (n = 10). After checking the articles, five articles were included in the final analysis. The average age of patients involved in this review was 34.48 years. The studies investigated fibula allografts to treat ONFH in 394 hips with a mean follow-up of 49.06 months. HHS was improved from 62.73 to 86.94. Radiographic progression was found in 33.66% of hips. The failure rate of head-saving surgery by THA was 14.5%. No patients had serious postoperative complications.

Limitations

The number of articles included in the study was small, and all studies were single-center studies. Most studies were retrospective with a low level of evidence. Surgical procedures were not identical with different follow-up times.

Conclusion

Although there are some limitations to our approach, this systematic review supports fibula allografting as a simple, effective treatment for early-stage ONFH, which presents less postoperative complications, and has a satisfactory clinical effect. We consider it to be worthy of promotion as a therapy for ONFH.

Introduction

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), which is usually divided into traumatic and non-traumatic ONFH, is also known as aseptic necrosis or avascular necrosis of the femoral head [1, 2]. Its cause is the death of osteocytes under the action of complex factors, which induces bone changes, subchondral bone fracture collapse, and changes in the shape and function of the femoral head. Traumatic ONFH is common in femoral neck fractures and hip dislocation. Hormone use has become the leading cause of non-traumatic ONFH [3]. Hormones are widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, diffuse connective tissue disease, and immune-related allergic diseases, among which 5–40% of patients develop ONFH after using large doses of hormones. ONFH mainly occurs in young patients with a high disability rate [4]. If the patient’s condition is not detected in a timely manner and treated effectively, 80% of patients will experience femoral head collapse [5, 6], and about 65–70% of patients require total hip arthroplasty (THA) to improve limb functions [7].

THA as a mature and classic orthopedic treatment has made great achievements in the treatment of hip joint disease [8]. However, young and middle-aged patients with ONFH using joint replacements have a greater incidence of complications such as infection, loosening, and long-term revision surgery [9]. Therefore, the main purpose of the treatment of early-stage ONFH in young adults should be to improve symptoms and functions, preserve the femoral head as much as possible, delay the time of joint replacement, and finally avoid artificial joint replacement [10].

There are many femoral head-preserving procedures, including restricted weight bearing protocols [11], core decompression [12], allogeneic bone compression and bone grafting [13], vascular bone flap implantation [14, 15], non/free-vascularized bone grafting [16], and osteotomy [10]. Non-vascularized bone grafting is simple, easy to perform, and more appealing [17]. Vascularized bone grafting is a demanding technique with high technical requirements and a long operative time [18], which is difficult to promote clinically. Fibula allografting provides strong support and is a simple operation without donor site morbidity, which has achieved good clinical effects in the treatment of early-stage ONFH.

Fibula allografting is becoming an increasingly popular technique for ONFH treatment. The majority studies of fibula allografting to the femoral head have been at single institutions and are hardly universal. We performed this systematic review to examine the effectiveness of fibula allografting for the treatment of early-stage ONFH, particularly improving hip functions through Harris hip scoring (HHS), block imaging progression, and preventing the conversion to THA.

Materials and methods

A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta analyses) guidelines. This review did not require ethical approval because it did not involve any processing of individual patient data. Search terms included “avascular necrosis” or “ischemic necrosis” or “osteonecrosis” and “femoral head” and “fibula*.” In addition, we checked the references of primary articles and reviews to avoid missing relevant articles. The articles included in our review were limited to English only and published at any time. Unpublished articles were not included in this review. Two independent authors separately completed the study selection. Any difference in opinions was resolved by discussion.

Criteria for inclusion in the review were as follows: the patients included in the study were patients with ONFH; randomized or nonrandomized clinical trials were included; ONFH patients were treated by a fibula allograft or compared a fibula allograft with other treatments; the article contained the required data. The exclusion criteria were animal studies, case reports, systematic reviews, and reports in languages other than English.

Data acquisition

We extracted the following details from each article: the first author’s name, publication year, demographic characteristics (number of hips, ONFH stage, sex, age, and follow-up time), clinical efficacy evaluation HHS, radiographic outcomes, the rate of conversation to THA, and adverse effects. The weighted average was calculated based on the total number of patients in each study to control for the size of the different cohorts.

Results

A total of 335 articles were selected from PubMed (n = 45), EMBASE (n = 77), Web of Science (n = 203), and other sources (n = 10). As illustrated in Fig. 1, after duplicate checking, title and abstract screening, and full text screening, five articles were ultimately included in the final analysis (Table 1). In four studies, the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification was used (Table 2). In one study, the Steinberg classification was used (Table 2). The characteristics of patients included in the study are shown in Table 1. The average age of patients involved in this review was 34.48 years (range, 18–63 years). These studies investigated fibula allografting for treatment of ONFH in 394 hips with a mean follow-up of 49.06 months (range, 24–168 months). HHS was improved from 62.73 (average, preoperation) to 86.94 (average, latest follow-up) (Table 3). Radiographic progression was found in 33.66% of hips (range, 7.25–69%) (Table 4). The failure rate of head-saving surgery by THA was 14.5% (range, 3.44–34.5%) (Table 5). No patients had serious postoperative complications (Table 5).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the selection process

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
Full size table
Table 2 Classification systems used in the studies
Full size table
Table 3 Methods and outcomes of HHS in the studies
Full size table
Table 4 Radiographic outcomes
Full size table
Table 5 Outcomes of the conversion rate to THA and complications
Full size table

Wei et al. [19] treated 162 patients (223 hips: ARCO II, 52 hips; IIIA, 171 hips) using a fibula allograft and autogenous bone graft, which were followed for an average of 24 months. They found that the average HHS was improved from 61 points to 85.7, and the excellent and good rates were 93.3% in stage II and 87% in stage III. Imaging was stable without progression in 58% of patients. At the last follow-up, there were 49 (19%) failed hips that resulted in THA. Complications occurred in 15 patients, such as mild pyrexia, minor wound hematoma, and deep infection. All of these complications were cured non-operatively by medication.

Zeng et al. [20] studied a consecutive series of 18 patients with non-traumatic bilateral ONFH. One side was treated with core decompression (IIB, five hips; IIC, 13 hips) followed by allogeneic bone grafting and fibular allografting, and the other side with THA. The mean follow-up was 53.2 months. The mean HHS of 18 hip-preserving hips was 83.8 ± 17.9 points postoperatively compared with 61.6 ± 17.0 preoperatively (P < 0.05). Zeng et al. also quantified the results in terms of the visual analog scale (VAS) in 18 hip-preserving hips. The preoperative VAS score was 6.2 ± 2.0 points, whereas the postoperative score was 2.8 ± 2.3 points (P < 0.05). At the last follow-up, 14 hips (78%) achieved good outcomes, whereas four hips (22%) underwent THA as the disease progressed. No significant postoperative complications occurred in 18 hip-preserving hips.

Wu et al. [21] treated ONFH using two allografted fibulae that were dispersed slightly away to support the on weight-bearing area. Through long-term follow-up (average, 14 years; range, 1–21 years), they observed that the success rate of preservation of the femoral head was 65.5%, the radiological success rate was 31%, and the mean HHS improved from 50.3 to 76.1. They concluded that gender, ONFH stage, and necrotic index were independent risk factors for conversion to THA.

Cao et al. [22] conducted a prospective randomized trial in which the experimental group underwent fibula allografting and autologous cancellous bone grafting, whereas the control group underwent fibula allografting only. After a mean 42.7-month follow-up, although the clinical efficacy (HHS and VAS) of the two groups showed a marked improvement (P < 0.001), the experimental group had better efficacy than the control group (P < 0.01). Although no significant statistical difference was observed in imaging progression between the experimental group (10.3%) and control group (26.9%), the number of improved hips in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group. THA was performed in one hip of the experimental group and in five hips of the control group. Only one patient in the control group had a subtrochanteric fracture and no other complications occurred.

Feng et al. [23] performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with two sides of ONFH for a mean of 7.0 years. One side was treated with a fibula allograft and cancellous bone (group A), and the other side with vascularized greater trochanter flap autografting (group B). In group A, the HHS improved from preoperative 70.7 ± 3.5 points (range 64–76 points) to postoperative 92.4 ± 4.0 points (range 80–98 points) (P < 0.01). The VAS was also included in their ratings, which decreased from 4.8 ± 1.2 points (range 3–9 points) to 1.1 ± 1.0 points (range 0–4 points) (P < 0.01). Only five hips in group A showed progression in imaging. Three hips at stage IIIB in group A needed a THA conversion at mean postoperative 5.6 years (range 4–7 years). Three hips at stage IIIB underwent THA at mean postoperative 5.6 years (range 4–7 years) after surgery. No postoperative complications occurred in group A.

Discussion

The purpose of our review was to find evidence in articles to evaluate whether a fibula allograft was an effective treatment for early-stage ONFH. In this review, after searching three databases and other resources, we identified five articles that determined the effect of a fibula allograft on treating ONFH. All fibula allografts included in the studies were applied for ONFH treatment by “Phemister technology.”

In 1949, Phemister first proposed the technique of non-vascularized bone transplantation for the treatment of early femoral head necrosis, namely the “Phemister technique” [21, 24].The technique uses an 8- or 10-mm diameter trephine through the lateral femoral neck of the greater trochanter to the necrotic area of the femoral head. The dead bone is scraped with a special tool and then inserted into the cortical bone to prevent the femoral head from collapsing. A fibula allograft has abundant sources without donor site morbidity, low immunogenicity, a strong osteogenic ability, and the same elastic modulus as autogenous bone with a certain mechanical strength and supporting effect [19, 25].

In this review, two studies reported the results of fibula allografting and autogenous cancellous bone grafting for ONFH [19]. One article was related to treatment of ONFH using a fibula allograft with a cancellous bone allograft, one with two fibula allografts, and one included a simple fibula graft. Different from most other studies [26,27,28], Wu et al. used two fibular allografts tapping into the femoral head deeply to the subchondral bone [21]. However, they did not perform a biomechanical analysis of the optimal number of grafts and position for structural support. Nonetheless, they believe that using two fibular allografts might provide more mechanical strength than a single allograft and without increasing the risk of fracture. Cao et al. found that using a multi-directional core decompression apparatus combined with a fibula allograft and autologous cancellous bone implantation was better than traditional methods. Feng et al. [20] demonstrated that a fibula allograft plus a cancellous bone allograft was more effective than vascularized greater trochanter flap autografting for the treatment of ARCO stage II ONFH. In comparison with vascularized fibular grafting, non-vascularized fibula allograft transplantation was less invasive and achieved similar clinical effects [29,30,31].

There are some limitations in this study. The number of articles included in the study was small, and all studies were single-center studies. Most studies were retrospective with a low level of evidence. Although the included patients were treated with fibula allografts for ONFH, their surgical procedures were not identical with different follow-up times.

Conclusion

In summary, after analyzing the relevant data, we found that allogeneic fibula transplantation is an effective method to treat early-stage ONFH, which improved hip functions, delayed the development of ONFH, and lowered the rate of THA. Allogeneic fibula transplantation for the treatment of early-stage ONFH is simple, has less postoperative complications, satisfactory clinical effects, and is worthy of promotion as a clinical therapy for ONFH.

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Abbreviations

ONFH:

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head

THA:

Total hip arthroplasty

HHS:

Harris hip scoring

ARCO:

Association Research Circulation Osseous

VAS:

Visual analog score

References

  1. Cui L, Zhuang Q, Lin J, et al. Multicentric epidemiologic study on six thousand three hundred and ninety five cases of femoral head osteonecrosis in China[J]. Int Orthop. 2016;40(2):267–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3061-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo P, Gao F, Wang Y, et al. The use of anticoagulants for prevention and treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review[J]. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(16):e6646. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000006646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yue J, Wan F, Zhang Q, et al. Effect of glucocorticoids on miRNA expression spectrum of rat femoral head microcirculation endothelial cells[J]. Gene. 2018;651:126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.01.057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaushik AP, Das A, Cui Q. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: an update in year 2012[J]. World J Orthop. 2012;3(5):49–57. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v3.i5.49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Koo KH, Kim R, Kim YS, et al. Risk period for developing osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients on steroid treatment [J]. Clin Rheumatol. 2002;21(4):299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100670200078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu X, Zhang Y, Guo X, et al. Identification of differentially expressed microRNAs involved in non-traumatic osteonecrosis through microRNA expression profiling [J]. Gene. 2015;565(1):22–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.03.072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu R, Liu Q, Wang K, et al. Comparative analysis of gene expression profiles in normal hip human cartilage and cartilage from patients with necrosis of the femoral head [J]. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18(1):98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-0991-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cech A, Kase M, Kobayashi H, et al. Pre-operative planning in THA. Part III: do implant size prediction and offset restoration influence functional outcomes after THA?[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03342-5.

  9. Calori GM, Mazza E, Colombo A, et al. Core decompression and biotechnologies in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head[J]. EFORT Open Rev. 2017;2(2):41–50. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.150006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Xia T, Wei W, Zhang C, et al. [Hip preservation experience of avascular necrosis of femoral head according to China-Japan Friendship Hospital classification][J]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;34(1):10–5. https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.201904075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ligh CA, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, et al. The effectiveness of free vascularized fibular flaps in osteonecrosis of the femoral head and neck: a systematic review[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(3):163–72. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1594294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang BL, Sun W, Shi ZC, et al. Treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head with the implantation of core decompression and concentrated autologous bone marrow containing mononuclear cells[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(7):859–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0939-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aoyama T, Fujita Y, Madoba K, et al. Rehabilitation program after mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation augmented by vascularized bone grafts for idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a preliminary study[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(3):532–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeng YR, He S, Feng WJ, et al. Vascularised greater trochanter bone graft, combined free iliac flap and impaction bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Int Orthop. 2013;37(3):391–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1773-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ali SA, Christy JM, Griesser MJ, et al. Treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head utilising free vascularised fibular graft: a systematic review[J]. Hip Int. 2014;24(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang C, Peng J, Lu S. Summary of the various treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head by mechanism: a review[J]. Exp Ther Med. 2014;8(3):700–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Keizer SB, Kock NB, Dijkstra PD, et al. Treatment of avascular necrosis of the hip by a non-vascularised cortical graft[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(4):460–6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B4.16950.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Papanagiotou M, Malizos KN, Vlychou M, et al. Autologous (non-vascularised) fibular grafting with recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-7 for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: preliminary report[J]. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(1):31–5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.32773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wei BF, Ge XH. Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head with core decompression and bone grafting[J]. Hip Int. 2011;21(2):206–10. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2011.6525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeng Y, Qi X, Feng W, et al. One-sided hip-preserving and concurrent contralateral total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of bilateral osteonecrosis of the femoral head in different stages: short-medium term outcomes[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0583-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu CT, Yen SH, Lin PC, et al. Long-term outcomes of Phemister bone grafting for patients with non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Int Orthop. 2019;43(3):579–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4013-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao P, Cai S, Dai C, et al. Multi-directional core decompression apparatus with impaction bone grafting for the treatment of femoral head osteonecrosi [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2018;11(10):10847–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feng W, Ye P, Ni S, et al. One-stage simultaneous hip-preserving surgeries for the management of bilateral femoral head osteonecrosis: a mean 7.0-year follow-up[J]. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):455. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1467-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Larson E, Jones LC, Goodman SB, et al. Early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: where are we and where are we going in year 2018?[J]. Int Orthop. 2018;42(7):1723–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3917-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(3):459–74. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199503000-00018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steinberg ME, Larcom PG, Strafford B, et al. Core decompression with bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;386:71–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200105000-00009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Israelite C, Nelson CL, Ziarani CF, et al. Bilateral core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:285–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000192365.58958.84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Plakseychuk AY, Kim SY, Park BC, et al. Vascularized compared with nonvascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(4):589–96. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200304000-00001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hasegawa Y, Sakano S, Iwase T, et al. Pedicle bone grafting versus transtrochanteric rotational osteotomy for avascular necrosis of the femoral head[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(2):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.85b2.13190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aldridge JM 3rd, Berend KR, Gunneson EE, et al. Free vascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of postcollapse osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Surgical technique[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(Suppl 1):87–101. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200403001-00012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Marciniak D, Furey C, Shaffer JW. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A study of 101 hips treated with vascularized fibular grafting[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(4):742–7. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nancy Schatken BS, MT (ASCP), from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

No

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ju’an Yue and He Gao contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Joint Surgery, Aviation General Hospital, Courtyard 3, AnwaiBeiyuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China

    Ju’an Yue, Xiaozhong Guo, Randong Wang, Bing Li, Qiang Sun, Wangyan Liu, Jiao Chen & Yingnan Li

  2. Disinfection Supply Division, Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China

    He Gao

Authors
  1. Ju’an Yue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. He Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaozhong Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Randong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qiang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wangyan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jiao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yingnan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Ju’an Yue and He Gao collect data and write article; Randong Wang and Bing Li were responsible for literature review; Xiaozhong Guo designed the subject, Wangyan Liu, Jiao Chen and Yingnan Li participated in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaozhong Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies were in accordance with the ethical standards of World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. The Ethics Committee of Aviation General Hospital approved this study.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to publish “Fibula allograft propping as an effective treatment for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review” in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

Competing interests

We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yue, J., Gao, H., Guo, X. et al. Fibula allograft propping as an effective treatment for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 206 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01730-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01730-6

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X