Table 3 Methods and outcomes of HHS in the studies
Study | Treatment | Assisted measures | Pre- vs. postop, Harris hip score | Results, excellent (n)/good (n)/rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wei et al. | Fibula allograft | Autogenous bone graft | IIA, 72.5 vs. 96 | 6/4/100% |
IIB, 0.2 vs. 90 | 52/5/93.40% | |||
IIC, 64.3 vs. 80.3 | 20/17/58.70% | |||
IIIA, 51.5 vs. 85.4 | 30/47/86.50% | |||
Total, 61.2 vs. 87.5 | 108/73/81.10% | |||
Zeng et al. | Fibula allograft | Allogeneic bone granule | IIB, 57.8 vs. 91.4 | – |
IIC, 63.0 vs. 80.9 | – | |||
Total, 61.6 vs. 83.8 | – | |||
Wu et al. | Two fibula allograft | – | Total, 50.3 vs. 76.1 | – |
Cao et al. | Fibula allograft | Multi-directional CD+ Autogenous bone graft | Total, 66.75 vs. 87.83 | 16/8/82.8% |
Fibula allograft | Single CD+ Autogenous bone graft | Total, 64.82 vs. 80.97 | 8/8/61.6% | |
Feng et al. | Fibula allograft | Allogeneic cancellous bone | Total, 70.7 vs. 92.4 | – |
VGTF | Autogenous bone graft | Total, 58.1 vs. 84.2 | – |