Skip to main content

Table 3 Methods and outcomes of HHS in the studies

From: Fibula allograft propping as an effective treatment for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review

StudyTreatmentAssisted measuresPre- vs. postop, Harris hip scoreResults, excellent (n)/good (n)/rate (%)
Wei et al.Fibula allograftAutogenous bone graftIIA, 72.5 vs. 966/4/100%
IIB, 0.2 vs. 9052/5/93.40%
IIC, 64.3 vs. 80.320/17/58.70%
IIIA, 51.5 vs. 85.430/47/86.50%
Total, 61.2 vs. 87.5108/73/81.10%
Zeng et al.Fibula allograftAllogeneic bone granuleIIB, 57.8 vs. 91.4
IIC, 63.0 vs. 80.9
Total, 61.6 vs. 83.8
Wu et al.Two fibula allograftTotal, 50.3 vs. 76.1
Cao et al.Fibula allograftMulti-directional CD+ Autogenous bone graftTotal, 66.75 vs. 87.8316/8/82.8%
Fibula allograftSingle CD+ Autogenous bone graftTotal, 64.82 vs. 80.978/8/61.6%
Feng et al.Fibula allograftAllogeneic cancellous boneTotal, 70.7 vs. 92.4
VGTFAutogenous bone graftTotal, 58.1 vs. 84.2
  1. CD core decompression, VGTF vascularized greater trochanter flap, Rate excellent and good rate