Skip to main content

Clinical evaluations of diaphysis malignant tumors of femur and tibia treated with microwave ablation in situ

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with diaphysis malignant tumors of femur and tibia treated with microwave ablation (MWA) in situ.

Methods

Retrospective study of 32 patients with diaphysis malignant bone tumors of femur or tibia have been treated by microwave ablation. Instead of en bloc resection, hyperthermia ablation in situ was carried out followed by strengthen procedure. The patients were followed up for a period ranging from 36 to 180 months.

Results

Twenty-five patients survived over 3 years and all of the patients alive have a satisfactory functional and cosmetic limb. The postoperative survival rate of MWA group was significantly higher than the amputation group in consecutive inclusions.

Conclusions

MWA is a feasible and effective surgical method for limb salvage operation and it might offer an innovative and distinctive therapeutic alternative for diaphysis malignant bone tumors, which avoiding osteotomy or prosthesis replacement.

Level of evidence

Level IV, clinical cohort study

Introduction

Primary malignant tumors arising from the diaphysis of the weight-bearing long tubular bone, such as femur or tibia, are relatively uncommon compared to those occur inmetaphyseal region of long bones. Despite its lower incidence (less than 10% in all bone malignant tumor cases), the therapeutical strategy for the diaphysis malignant bone tumor remains challenging among surgeons of bone oncology [1]. Wide resection and limb salvage surgery were considered as the standard surgical procedure for malignant musculoskeletal tumors [2, 3]. Compared with simple amputation, limb salvage technique did not compromise survival rate. In contrast, it achieved a lower rate of local recurrence and partially retained the physical function of affected limbs [4]. Most patients with primary bone tumor are children and young adults; thus, the aim of treatment is supposed to not only excise the tumor site, prolong the patients’ life span, but also preserve the affected limbs, maintain the physical function without major complications or recurrences over long time.

Several materials could be applied to reconstruct the defect left after intercalary resection, such as intercalary prostheses [2] and bone allografts [5]. Autologous bone allograft includes vascularized autologous fibula grafts [6], extracorporeal irradiated and re-implanted cemented autologous bone graft. Unfortunately, there is still no consensus among orthopedic surgeons to reconstructed defects after wide resection, because each aforementioned procedure has its benefits and weaknesses; patients after prosthesis replacement could promptly restored to a nearly normal daily life but long-term loosening, wear, and breakage could also be seen for it; the considerable durability is the main advantage of biological allograft-based reconstruction, but the triad complication “infection, fracture, and nonunion,” which could occur after allograft procedures were frequently reported by other researchers [2, 7].

Microwave ablation is a kind of promising technique for medical use. When target tissues were radiated with electromagnetic wave, water and other polar molecules oscillate and these molecules can generate heat by frictional interaction between each other in all biological organisms. The intensive heating (with the temperature of 80–100 °C for 20 min) can cause all the living tissues to be irreversible devitalized with death of cells and disruption of the extracellular matrix. So far, the MWA procedure has been used as a classical hyperthermia ablation method among various cancer treatments with the intention to induce direct killing of tumor cells or modulation of tumor architecture [8]. According to our experiences, the MWA procedure was widely implemented as a preferred routine surgical procedure for extremity and pelvis malignant musculoskeletal tumors for decades [9].

Methods

This was a single-centered and retrospective study approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Air Force Military Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital (Tangdu Hospital). We performed a retrospective review of all patients who diagnosed as diaphysis malignant bone tumors of femur or tibia of from May 2004 to October 2013. The inclusive criteria of this study were as follows: (1) patients who were diagnosed as a primary malignant bone tumor occurring diaphysis of femur and tibia confirmed by experienced pathologists, (2) patients who do not received any surgical procedures before coming to our institute, and (3) patients who signed the informed consent that all clinical data could be obtained for study using. If the patients were too young (< 8 years) or too old (> 70 years), they were not allowed to participate in this clinical research. In addition, the patients with preoperative multiple organ metastases (≥ 2 locations) were also excluded from this study.

Patients

Among the inclusion, 42 patients were performed with microwave ablation, as a definite measure of limb-salvage procedure. Despite 10 patients who had been lost of follow-up, 32 patients were followed up for a period ranging from 36 to 180 months (averaging 56.69 ± 38.71 months). Another 32 patients who accepted amputation treatment were selected as contrastive cases. All patients were evaluated for the clinical and functional outcomes by musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) rating scales. The demographic data of 32 patients treated with MVA and 32 patients treated with amputation were presented as Table 1 and Table 2. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 30.94 ± 18.46 years (ranging from 11 to 66). All cases had a histological diagnosis based on incisional biopsy (Table 3). Of the 64 cases (30 men and 34 women), the most common tumor was osteosarcoma (24 cases) followed by metastatic neoplasm (16cases); the femur was the most frequently involved skeletal site (26 cases) followed by the tibia (6 cases).

Table 1 Details of patients who suffered from diaphysis malignant tumors of femur/tibia and underwent microwave ablation
Table 2 Details of patients who suffered from diaphysis malignant tumors of femur/tibia and underwent amputation
Table 3 Histological diagnosis summary of diaphysis malignant tumors of femur/tibia after microwave ablation

The primary tumor was evaluated on plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans. The CT scanning of the chest and ultrasonic examination of abdominal organs were also performed to confirm that there were no newly occurring metastases.

For patients with osteosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma or other primary/metastasis highly malignant bone tumor, neoadjuvant chemotherapy before operation was given according to the clinical therapeutic guideline or authoritative literature documents. In detail, all the selected patients received the 2–3 circles of standard three-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a 4-week interval between cycles. After receiving the full course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, all the patients were restaged using MRI and received surgery 3 weeks after the last course. Postoperative chemotherapy was performed every 3 months and lasted for 12 to 24 months.

Surgical procedure

The main concept here is to dissect the tumor-bearing bone from surrounding normal tissues with a safe margin and subsequently perform an en bloc ablation using antenna-guided hyperthermia therapy. Currently, co-axial microwave antennas (require circulating water to cool the tip of the antenna to avoid metal melting damage due to high temperature) were inserted into the carefully dissected and isolated tumor tissue block. Three to 8 antennae were used variably depended on the tumor size and extension. The distance between two antennas was about 3 cm. The goal of thermal ablations was to create an ablation zone that extends at least 1 cm beyond the tumor boundary at all points after being heated to 70–100 °C for 20–30 min. During surgery, multiple thermocouples were placed in various critical locations to monitor the temperature within and around the bulk. The soft dead tissues were removed and/or curetted leaving behind the defective bone (bone scaffold with adequate strength) for reconstruction using any of the currently accepted methods, such as fibular autograft, allograft, or bone cement.

Follow-up

Patients in both MVA and amputation groups were followed up for a period ranging from 36 to 180 months (mean, 57.1 months). The length of surgery and the duration of hospital stay were recorded for each case. Postoperative plaster immobilization was applied for 6 months and then removed. Patients were encouraged to do functional training with initial protection of the brace. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up and the subsequent follow-up visits, patients were asked to attend an outpatient clinic where a survey of the MSTS was registered to assess patients’ function and satisfaction. Postoperative A-P and lateral X-rays of the diseased region and the adjacent joints were taken at month 3, month 6, month 12, and every 6 months subsequently until bony union occurred, and then every 6 months until 5 years after the operation. The types of ablation time were noted in each case. Complications requiring further surgery were also recorded.

Statistical analysis

Limb function was evaluated with the MSTS rating scales, which comprise six items, namely, pain, function, emotional acceptance, support, walking, and gait. Five points are allocated to each item and the highest score is 30 (100 %). Survival percentage of patients was recorded and analyzed using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test with 95% confidence interval. SPSS17.0 was used for data variation analysis. The mean and the standard deviation for baseline descriptive characteristics were calculated.

Results

Typical procedure and approaches based on our experiences

With more than 20 years’ experience, we conducted typical MWA procedure and approaches for various parts of extremities and pelvis (Fig. 1). The incisions were required to be long enough, so that the adjacent vital neurovascular bundle could be carefully dissected and protected during ablation process. The surgeons must be familiar with the local anatomies because the osteotomy was seldom executed and the soft tissue surrounding the tumor mass was required to be accurately distinguished with reliable safe margins. The soft tissue coverage in the legs was relatively poor, and the local muscles and skin were supposed to be retained and protected in situ, besides neurovascular bundle (Fig. 2). In some cases, the incision safety could benefit from gastrocnemius muscle flap transfer. As some details for saving pathological fractures, the tumor-bearing bone should be dissected from surrounding normal tissues with safe margin without piercing the hematoma around the displaced fracture ends (Fig. 3). To make sure the hematoma was not broken, some adjacent muscles with secondary roles, i.e., the vastus intermedius in femoral diaphysis, would be retained in situ and experience microwave ablation process together with the lesion, soft tumor mass, and hematoma.

Fig. 1
figure1

Typical procedure for malignant bone tumors at femoral diaphysis. a Image data of A-P X ray and MRI films demonstrated an osteosarcoma at femoral diaphysis before surgery. There were distinct signs of cortical bone destruction in the middle part of the right femoral shaft and visible soft tissue mass shadow in the anterolateral range of quadriceps femoris. b The incision demonstration from lateral thigh after skin degerming. c Dissect the tumor-bearing bone from surrounding normal tissues with safe margin and a heat-isolation pad was put between the tumor bone and surrounding normal tissues. d The microwave generator and antenna were inserted into the tumor bulk and began to deliver electromagnetic energy into the tumor bone. e Soft tumor mass and tumor bone inside the femoral diaphysis were removed and bone graft cavity was prepared. f The mixture materials of autologous fibular graft with allograft bone chips or bone cement were used for filling the cavity. g Restore the normal shape of the femoral diaphysis and give a prophylactic fixation. h Postoperative A-P X ray film showed the complete tumor removal and perfect bone transplantation

Fig. 2
figure2

Typical procedure for malignant bone tumors at tibial diaphysis. a Image data of A-P and lateral X ray films showed a metastatic neoplasm from primary thyroid carcinoma to distal tibial diaphysis before surgery. The vague boundary of the bone defect demonstrated that the lesion might be malignant. b Preoperative MRI imaging film demonstrated the accurate location and involved range of the metastatic lesion. c The microwave generator and antenna were inserted into the tumor bulk and began to deliver electromagnetic energy into the tumor bone. d Tumor bone inside the tibial diaphysis was removed and bone graft cavity was prepared. e The allograft bone fragments were used to fill the bone defect and a prophylactic fixation with was conducted using molding steel plate. f Postoperative A-P X and lateral ray films demonstrated the tumor removal and tibia rebuilding

Fig. 3
figure3

Typical procedure for pathological fracture from malignant bone tumors. a Image data of A-P and lateral X ray films showed a metastatic neoplasm from primary renal carcinoma to distal femoral diaphysis before surgery. There was visible bone destruction at the displaced fracture ends. b Preoperative MRI imaging film demonstrated the soft tumor mass and hematoma surrounding the metastatic bone lesion. c Dissect the tumor-bearing bone from surrounding normal tissues with safe margin without piercing the hematoma around the displaced fracture ends. To make sure the hematoma was not broken, the vastus intermedius was retained in situ and would experience microwave ablation process together with the lesion, soft tumor mass, and hematoma. d The microwave generator and antenna were inserted into the tumor bulk and began to deliver electromagnetic energy into the tumor bulk. e Soft tumor mass was removed and fracture ends were exposed. f The mixture materials of autologous fibular graft with bone cement were used for filling defect space and the fracture was reduced and fixed through rigid steel plate. g Postoperative A-P X ray film showed the perfect reduction and reliable fixation

Oncological results

Due to the good exposure and reliable protection of vital neurovascular bundle during the MVA procedure, 25 of 32 patients survived over 3 years and all of the patients alive have a satisfactory functional and cosmetic limb (Table 4). Six cases with high-grade malignancy died from cachexia, renal failure, or postoperative visceral metastasis, and one young patient with osteosarcoma died from chemotherapy reactions with the irreversible reduction of blood ternary systems (i.e., peripheral blood hemoglobin, white blood cell, and blood platelet count), during the third postoperative circle. The remaining 25 cases survived over 3 years with the longest follow-up period of 15 years. As a result of comparison, the postoperative survival rate of MWA group was significantly higher than the amputation group in consecutive inclusions (P = 0.0059) (Fig. 4a).

Table 4 Outcomes of patients of diaphysis malignant tumors of femur/tibia treated with microwave ablation
Fig. 4
figure4

Comparison of clinical outcomes between the MWA group and amputation group. a The survival curve of diaphysis malignant tumors of femur/tibia treated with MWA verses amputation strategy. About 78% patients from the MWA population survived over 3 years after limb salvage surgery log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test compared to the amputation group (nearly 47%). Once 3 years follow-up achieved, no subsequent death occurred in both groups in this series study. b At the 6-month postoperative follow-up and the subsequent follow-up visits, patients were asked to attend an outpatient clinic where a survey of the MSTS was registered to assess patients’ function and satisfaction. The average postoperative MSTS rating score percentage was 92.13 ± 5.93%, which was significantly higher than the amputation group (75.81 ± 10.44%) in our consecutive inclusions. (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001)

Functional results

All the patients alive had a functional and cosmetic limb. Most patients’ function was restored to sport level. At the final follow-up visit, no patients showed adjacent joint instability. The average postoperative MSTS rating score percentage was 92.13 ± 5.93%, which was significantly higher than the amputation group (75.81 ± 10.44%) in our consecutive inclusions (P = 0.00014) (Fig. 4b). We also reviewed some recent reports using different techniques to treat primary malignant musculoskeletal tumor, and the MWA therapeutic alternative has more advantages such as ablation in situ, reliable devitalization, less implants requirement, and less osteotomy requirement. The postoperative functional evaluation of MWA showed more superior outcomes than other therapeutic strategies, such as devitalizing autologous tumor-bearing bone in 99% alcohol for 30 min in vitro [10], in 20% sterile saline at 65 °C for 30 min [11], extracorporeal irradiation with X-rays [12], alcohol devitalization combined with prosthesis [13], prosthesis replacements [14], or other biological reconstruction after wide surgical resection [15].

Complication

According to the MWA therapeutic principle, osteotomy was seldom required and nearly no prosthesis insertion was needed, therefore, the postoperative complication rate could be reduced to some level correspondingly (Table 5). Only one Ewing’s sarcoma patient was infected with gram-positive bacteria because of the poor soft tissue cover of proximal tibia, who got local control after debridement and benefit from gastrocnemius muscle flap transfer. Another vascular compromise was detected within 24 h postoperatively, and the patient with prostate metastatic neoplasm to distal femur was saved after the emergency vascular transplantation surgery. Three cases had recurrence, one was wrongly treated in other hospital by curettage so that the soft tissue contamination was too severe to get safe margin; the patient got local control after revision surgery. The other two cases suffered huge extraosseous tumor bulk, and amputation was needed after recurrence. Four cases with osteosarcoma suffered lung metastases and died within postoperative 2 years. Two postoperative fractures occurred within 2 years in consideration of the excessive ablation of the normal bone surrounding the lesion. Two cases respectively with very huge chondrosarcoma and osteosarcoma, osteotomy was needed during surgery to facilitate dissection, then delayed union occurred, one needs revision surgery.

Table 5 Complications of diaphysis malignant tumors of femur/tibia treated with microwave ablation

Discussion

The use of high temperatures as treatment for multiple tumors, known as hyperthermic ablation, has existed for years [16]. Evidence regarding the therapeutically use of hyperthermic ablation for cancers of the liver, breast, and lung has been reported accumulatively [17, 18]. Microwave energy, typically at 2.45 GHz or 915 MHz, radiated by the antenna causes rapid agitation of water and other polar molecules in tissues, a process known as dielectric hysteresis. Therefore, microwaves enable faster heating of larger targets. During the procedure of involving thermal ablation, a set of thin ablation applicators were guided into the target tumor under image guidance. Electromagnetic energy was then applied into the tissue until temperatures rise to a cytotoxic level (50–60 °C), at which temperature, tumor cells around the applicators necrosed while the normal tissues outside of tumor sites preserved by cooling protection systems.

The main purpose of limb salvage surgery for malignant bone tumors is to save the diseased limbas far as possible through nomutilating surgery and without jeopardizing the prospects of survival; it has been performed for more than three decades. This type of surgical procedure mainly consists of two steps: en bloc resection of the tumor-bearing bone and reconstruction for the remained defect. Various techniques have been used for reconstruction, among which, metal prosthesis replacement has been widely used, and proved to be an effective practice [19]. Custom-made intercalary prosthesis has the advantage of allowing early weight-bearing training with adjuvant equipment and return to normal daily life. However, loosening, wearing, and breakage of prosthesis had been reported and the long-term survival rate was still of great concern, thereby limiting the use for young patients [20]. Compared with the patients with limited life expectancy, such as patients with metastatic lesion, whose early functional recovery is of greater concern than durability, but for children and adolescent patients, intercalary prosthesis is a less preferred option [21]. While MWA technique could be used to provide a relatively enough initial length of remained bones for further reconstruction and adequate mechanical strength for early weight-bearing training even only a little juxta articular bone is tumor free. The summarized pros-and-cons comparison of amputation, endoprosthesis, and MVA is available in Table 6.

Table 6 A summary of the pros and cons of surgical techniques for diaphysis malignant tumor of long bones

If the traditionally defined wide margin resection was identified with intercalary resection technique, MWA technique could achieve a similar goal while retaining the curetted cortical bone intact (scaffold), thus making it easier and more durable for the following reconstruction of limb. If the devitalized bone scaffold together with fibular autograft and metal-ware implants, could endure in the first 1 or 2 years, it would thereafter achieve functional outcome for the duration of patient’s life because according to our experience, the devitalized bone can be gradually revitalized to living bone [22]. Once healing occurred, it is durable, so there is no worry about wear and tear as to the prosthesis.

In our previous study, it has been verified that MWA-processed tumor cells could be applied to induce specific antitumor effects [23]. In that paper, we mainly focused on the residual tumor cells from the “gray zone” of ablation, where the tissues and cells were likely to be incompletely ablated. Then we established the in situ ablation model, which is an ideal model for mimicking the MWA therapeutic process. After in situ ablation, the expression of Calreticulin (CRT), which is expressed on tumor cell surface and recognized as a critical role in antigen presenting process was significantly upregulated according to western blot and immunofluorescence assay. CRT was also one of the important signal molecules of immunogenic cell death [24]. The expression of CRT on the tumor cell surface might contribute to the tumor cell adhesion by dendritic cells and thus might elicit tumor-specific CD8+ T cell-mediated immune responses. These T cells might contribute to the elimination of survived tumor cells that have not been ablated directly by hyperthermia, leading to protect the patients from local recurrence or new metastasis. It was worth mentioning that the cell debris and degenerated organelles from whole ablated tumor cells might serve as general cancer antigens because the hyperthermia-induced organelle exposure of whole tumor cell compositions might be a superior alternative to other well-known antigen loading vaccines. In addition, these findings offer a feasible option for the use of MWA in combination with immunotherapy, especially for patients who have failed with chemotherapy or have limited options.

In summary, the present study provided valid evidence that MWA-based salvage limb surgery could be applied to provide a novel idea for malignant bone tumor treatment. Although MWA technique for treating malignant bone tumor is challenging for junior orthopedic surgeons, this surgery procedure could be mastered through persistent practice for years. According to our advice, it is worthy of such greatly persistent efforts to promote and popularize the MVA technique in limb salvage strategies for malignant bone tumor treatment. The early functional outcome is expected to be superior after MWA since neither prosthesis nor allograft could achieve better biocompatibility and biomechanical feature than an intact native material. Furthermore, the patients after MWA procedure could carry out earlier weight-bearing training and the long-term physical functions of reconstruction effected limbs might be more durable. Although this is a small size of case studies with relatively shorter follow-up time, our experience suggests that MWA might offer an innovative and distinctive therapeutic alternative for diaphysis malignant bone tumors.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials are available from the department of orthopedic surgery, orthopedics oncology institute of Chinese PLA, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University. The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

MWA:

Microwave ablation

MSTS:

Musculoskeletal tumor society

CT:

Computed tomography

References

  1. 1.

    Kong CB, Kim MS, Lee SY, et al. Prognostic effect of diaphyseal location in osteosarcoma: a cohort case-control study at a single institute. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3094–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Benevenia J, Kirchner R, Patterson F, Beebe K, Wirtz DC, Rivero S, Palma M, Friedrich MJ. Outcomes of a modular intercalary endoprosthesis as treatment for segmental defects of the femur, tibia, and humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(2):539–48..

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tan PX, Yong BC, Wang J, Huang G, Yin JQ, Zou CY, Xie XB, Tang QL, Shen JN. Analysis of the efficacy and prognosis of limb-salvage surgery for osteosarcoma around the knee. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(12):1171–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mavrogenis AF, Abati CN, Romagnoli C, Ruggieri P. Similar survival but better function for patients after limb salvage versus amputation for distal tibia osteosarcoma. Clin OrthopRelat Res. 2012;470(6):1735–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao L, Ranalletta M, Abalo E. Intercalary femur and tibia segmental allografts provide an acceptable alternative in reconstructing tumor resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Puri A, Gulia A, Jambhekar N, Laskar S. The outcome of the treatment of diaphyseal primary bone sarcoma by resection, irradiationand re-implantation of the host bone: extracorporeal irradiation as an option for reconstruction indiaphyseal bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(7):982–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:86–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pusceddu C, Sotgia B, Fele RM, Melis L. Treatment of bone metastases with microwave thermal ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(2):229–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Fan QY, Ma BA, Zhou Y, Zhang MH, Hao XB. Bone tumors of the extremities or pelvis treated by microwave-induced hyperthermia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;406:165–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yang J, Zhu B, Fu K, Yang Q. The long-term outcomes following the use of inactivated autograft in the treatment of primary malignant musculoskeletal tumor. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Qu H, Guo W, Yang R, Li D, Tang S, Yang Y, Dong S, Zang J. Reconstruction of segmental bone defect of long bones after tumor resection by devitalized tumor-bearing bone. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sharma DN, Rastogi S, Bakhshi S, Rath GK, Julka PK, Laviraj MA, Khan SA, Kumar A. Role of extracorporeal irradiation in malignant bone tumors. Indian J Cancer. 2013;50(4):306–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yu XC, Xu SF, Xu M, Liu XP, Song RX, Fu ZH. Alcohol-inactivated autograft replantation with joint preservation in the management of osteosarcoma of the distal femur: a preliminary study. Oncol Res Treat. 2014;37(10):554–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cipriano CA, Gruzinova IS, Frank RM, Gitelis S, Virkus WW. Frequent complications and severe bone loss associated with the repiphysis expandable distal femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(3):831–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Erol B, Basci O, Topkar MO, Caypinar B, Basar H, Tetik C. Mid-term radiological and functional results of biological reconstructions of extremity-located bone sarcomas in children and young adults. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015;24(5):469–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hegyi G, Szasz O, Szasz A. Oncothermia: a new paradigmand promising method in cancer therapies. Acupunct Electrother Res. 2013;38(3-4):161–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Clevert DA, Paprottka PM, Helck A, Reiser M, Trumm CG. Image fusion in the management of thermal tumor ablation of the liver. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2012;52(2-4):205–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yamamoto D, Inui T, Tsubota Y, Sueoka N, Yamamoto C, Kuwana K, Yamamoto M. The utility of hyperthermia for local recurrence of breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol. 2012;10:201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Niimi R, Matsumine A, Hamaguchi T, Nakamura T, Uchida A, Sudo A. Prosthetic limb salvage surgery for bone and soft tissue tumors around the knee. Oncol Rep. 2012;28(6):1984–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jentzsch T, Erschbamer M, Seeli F, Fuchs B. Extensor function after medial gastrocnemius flap reconstruction of the proximal tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(7):2333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jansen JA, van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD. Poor long-term clinical results of saddle prosthesis after resection of peri acetabular tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(1):324–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ji Z, Ma Y, Li W, Li X, Zhao G, Yun Z, Qian J, Fan Q. The healing process of intracorporeally and in situ devitalized distal femur by microwave in a dog model and its mechanical properties in vitro. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30505.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yu Z, Geng J, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Fan Q, Chen J. Treatment of osteosarcoma with microwave thermal ablation to induce immunogenic cell death. Oncotarget. 2014;5(15):6526–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Obeid M, Panaretakis T, Tesniere A, Joza N, Tufi R, Apetoh L, Ghiringhelli F, Zitvogel L, Kroemer G. Leveraging the immune system during chemotherapy: moving calreticulin to the cell surface converts apoptotic death from "silent" to immunogenic. Cancer Res. 2007;67(17):7941–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Edmond YS Chao and Dr. Sim FH (Mayo Clinic, USA) for the assistance with lots of suggestion and encouragement.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31670940/ C080904).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Zhe Yu, Chuan Dong, Qingyu Fan Development of methodology: Minghua Zhang, Qingyu Fan. Acquisition of data: ZheYu, MinghuaZhang, Tongshuan Gao, Yindi Yang. Analysis and interpretation of data: Zhe Yu, Rui Ding. Writing, review of manuscript: Zhe Yu, Chuan Dong, Qingyu Fan. Administrative, technical or administrative support: MinghuaZhang, Rui Ding, Yindi Yang. Study supervision: Qingyu Fan. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qingyu Fan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by institutional Review Board of Air Force Military Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital (Tangdu). The approval number is TDLL201804-33.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Z., Dong, C., Zhang, M. et al. Clinical evaluations of diaphysis malignant tumors of femur and tibia treated with microwave ablation in situ. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01662-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Limb salvage surgery
  • Diaphysis
  • Bone tumor
  • Microwave ablation
  • Functional evaluation