Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The association between abdominal obesity and femoral neck bone mineral density in older adults

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 18, Article number: 171 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The relationship between obesity and osteoporosis is complex, with contradictory findings reported. Our aim was to evaluate the association between waist circumference (WC), as an easy-to-determine clinical index of abdominal obesity, and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) among older adults, using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database.

Methods

Data of five NHANES cycles (2005–2010, 2013–2014, and 2017–2018), including 5801 adults aged ≥ 60 years, were used in the analysis. Weighted multiple regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between WC and femoral neck BMD. Weighted generalized additive models and smooth curve fitting were further performed to characterize nonlinearities in the association.

Results

There was a positive association between WC and femoral neck BMD in non-adjusted models. After adjusting for body mass index (BMI), the association became negative. On subgroup analysis stratified by sex, this negative association only existed for men. An inverted U-shaped curve relationship between WC and femoral neck BMD was further identified, with an inflection point at a WC of 95 cm for both men and women.

Conclusions

Abdominal obesity is a negative predictor of bone health among older adults, independent of BMI. The association between WC and femoral neck BMD followed an inverted U-shaped curve.

Introduction

Osteoporosis has become a serious problem globally, with its prevalence having increased to 21.7% among elderly individuals [1]. The rate of obesity is also increasing among aging adults [2], with 57.8% of older individuals projected to be overweight or obese by 2030 [3]. Although osteoporosis and obesity may occur together, the relationship between the two is complex, with contradictory views presented.

Obesity is generally classified as abdominal obesity, indexed by waist circumference (WC), and general obesity, quantified by the body mass index (BMI) [4]. A positive relationship between BMI and bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported, indicating that higher body weight may have a protective effect against osteoporosis [5]. Yet, a positive association between general obesity and bone fractures was revealed by recent literature [6]. Therefore, the effect of obesity on bone health is complicated and controversial, creating an “obesity paradox” [7]. Moreover, abdominal obesity is increasingly recognized as a key contributor to adverse health risks [8]. Yet, the association between abdominal obesity and BMD among older adults remains to be clarified. Moreover, as the proportion of elderly in the general population has increased, the incidence of hip fractures has risen [9], which usually requires surgical treatment and has been a leading cause of hospitalization in elderly patients [10, 11]. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the association between WC and femoral neck BMD among older adults, using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database.

Methods

Study population

The NHANES survey uses a complex, multistage, probability sampling design to evaluate the health and nutritional status of the non-institutionalized population of the United States. The data of the NHANES survey are released in 2-year cycles. As the NHANES 2011–2012 and 2015–2016 cycles did not include femoral neck BMD data, we combined data from the following five cycles for analysis in our study: 2005–2010, 2013–2014, and 2017–2018. Among the 9788 adults, aged ≥ 60 years, identified in the database, we excluded those with missing WC or BMI data (n = 1291), missing femoral neck BMD data (n = 1219), and with a cancer history (n = 1477). After screening, the data from 5801 participants were included in the final analysis.

Ethics statement

All NHANES protocols were approved by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Research Ethics Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from the participants for data collection and publication for research.

Study variables

The exposure variable was WC, which was collected by trained health technicians in the Mobile Examination Center. WC was measured at the uppermost lateral border of the right ilium, to the nearest 0.1 cm. The outcome variable was femoral neck BMD, which was obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Hologic Inc., Bedford, MA USA) [12].

Additionally, the following data were collected as covariates in the analysis: age, sex, race, education level, income-poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, alcohol use, smoking cigarettes, BMI, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum glucose, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, and serum 25(OH)D. Details of the acquisition process of WC, BMD, and other covariates are available on the NHANES website (www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/).

Statistical analysis

As recommended by the analytical guideline edited by NCHS, we used appropriate sampling weights to ensure national representation. Weighted multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between WC and femoral neck BMD. According to the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines[13], we employed four models: model 1, no adjustment; model 2, adjusted for age, sex, and race; model 3, model 2 plus adjustment of BMI; and model 4, adjusted for all covariates. To characterize nonlinearity in the association between WC and femoral neck BMD, weighted generalized additive models and smooth curve fittings were further performed. All analyses were performed using EmpowerStats software and R version 3.4.3, with a P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

The weighted relevant characteristics of the 5,801 participants included in the analysis are presented in Table 1. Compared to women, men had higher levels of serum uric acid, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, WC, femoral neck BMD, and lower levels of serum phosphorus and calcium.

Table 1 The weighted characteristics of the subjects
Full size table

The association between WC and femoral neck BMD for the four linear regression models is shown in Table 2. In models 1 and 2, WC was positively associated with femoral neck BMD. However, after adjusting for BMI, this association became negative (model 3: β = −0.7, 95% CI: −1.3, −0.2; model 4, β = −0.5, 95% CI: −1.1, −0.0). On subgroup analysis stratified by sex and race, the negative association only existed for men (β = −1.5, 95% CI: −2.4, -0.6) and Mexican Americans (β = −1.3, 95%CI: −2.6, −0.0).

Table 2 Association between waist circumference (cm) and femoral neck bone mineral density (mg/cm2) among old adults
Full size table

We evaluated the individual association between BMI and WC and femoral neck BMD, respectively, to clarify the mediating role of BMI on the association between WC and femoral neck BMD (Fig. 1), as well as performing a subgroup analysis stratified by BMI. In these analyses, the negative association between WC and femoral neck BMD existed in men for the BMI groups of 25–29.9 kg/m2 and ≥ 30 kg/m2 groups and in women for the BMI group ≥ 30 kg/m2 (Table 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Association between body mass index and waist circumference and femoral neck bone mineral density. a Association between body mass index and waist circumference. b Association between body mass index and femoral neck bone mineral density

Full size image
Table 3 Association between waist circumference (cm) and femoral neck bone mineral density (mg/cm2) among older adults, stratified by body mass index
Full size table

Curve fitting for nonlinearity revealed an inverted U-shaped curve relationship between WC and femoral neck BMD in both men and women (Figs. 2 and 3). The inflection point was identified at 95 cm for both men and women (Table 4).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Association between waist circumference and femoral neck bone mineral density. a Each black point represents a sample. b Solid rad line represents the smooth curve fit between variables. Blue bands represent the 95% of confidence interval from the fit. Age, sex, race, body mass index, education level, income-poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, smoking, alcohol use, smoking cigarettes, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum glucose, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, and serum 25(OH)D were adjusted

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between waist circumference and femoral neck bone mineral density, stratified by sex. Age, race, body mass index, education level, income-poverty ratio, moderate recreational activities, smoking, alcohol use, smoking cigarettes, blood urea nitrogen, total protein, serum uric acid, serum glucose, serum phosphorus, serum calcium, and serum 25(OH)D were adjusted

Full size image
Table 4 Threshold effect analysis of waist circumference (cm) on femoral neck bone mineral density (mg/cm2) in older adults using two-piecewise linear regression model
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, we retrospectively investigated the association between WC, as a clinical parameter of abdominal obesity, and femoral neck BMD among older adults. We identified a U-shaped association between these two variables, with a point of inflection at a WC of 95 cm in both men and women. A previous study reported that general obesity was associated with a significantly higher BMD among healthy-weight individuals, suggestive of a protective effect of obesity, defined by the BMI, for osteoporosis [14]. A recent meta-analysis of 121 studies also reported higher lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and radius BMD among men and premenopausal and postmenopausal women compared to their non-obesity counterparts [15]. However, obesity is no longer defined by BMI alone, with abdominal adiposity, measured by the WC, having become widely accepted as a better predictor of several adverse health outcomes [16, 17]. However, data regarding the association between abdominal obesity and BMD are scarce and inconsistent.

A rural community study conducted in Taiwan reported a negative association between abdominal obesity and osteoporosis in all three logistic regression models [18]. In a cross-sectional study conducted in Turkey, the authors found that the association between WC and BMD differed by sites of BMD measurement, with a positive association at the hip but a negative association for non-weight-bearing sites [19]. By comparison, results of a Korean community-based study of individuals aged ≥ 50 years revealed that WC was independently and inversely associated with femoral neck and lumbar spine BMD, after adjusting for other body composition parameters, with this association being stronger in men than women [20]. This result was consistent with a previous Korean community-dwelling cohort study which reported a negative association between WC and bone mineral content after adjusting for weight [21]. In a cross-sectional study of 4,663 Chinese men of normal weight (BMI, 18.5–22.9 kg/m2), WC was identified as a negative predictor of calcaneal BMD [22]. The results of a survey of a nationally representative sample of elderly individuals in Israel showed a positive association between abdominal obesity and fragility fractures, independent of BMI, suggesting that WC may be a useful and easily measured anthropometric indicator for assessing the risk of osteoporotic fractures [23]. Our data showed a positive association between WC and femoral neck BMD in the non-BMI adjusted models and a negative association after adjusting for BMI, particularly in men. These different conclusions may be attributed to the study population, study design, BMD examination methods and sites of evaluation, and the control of confounding variables, especially BMI.

The exact mechanism for the deleterious effects of obesity on bone health remains unclear. Several mechanisms have been proposed: increased metabolism and accelerated senescence in stromal stem cells [24]; increased inflammation associated with obesity [25]; replacement of osteoblasts by fat cells in bone marrow [26]; and mutations in the fat mass and obesity-associated gene leading to bone fragility [27]. Further studies are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms linking obesity and bone health. Considering the negative impact of abdominal obesity on bone health and other health conditions, lifestyle interventions and well-designed clinical trials are urgently needed for the prevention and management of abdominal obesity among older individuals.

The NHANES survey provided data from a nationally representative sample and this large sample size was sufficient to provide good statistical power. Nevertheless, several limitations of our study should be noted. First, definitive causal inferences could not be determined due to the inherent nature of a cross-sectional study. Second, lumbar spine BMD was not included in the analysis because the target population for lumbar spine BMD was aged 8–59 years. Third, participants with a history of cancer were excluded; therefore, the findings of our study do not apply to this clinical population. Fourth, the bias caused by residual confounding factors remains.

In summary, we identified abdominal obesity as a negative predictor of bone health among older adults, independent of BMI, with an inverted U-shaped association, and a point of inflection at a WC of 95 cm. Our findings indicate the need for effective weight-management strategies to lower the risk of age-related obesity and improve bone health.

References

  1. Salari N, Darvishi N, Bartina Y, Larti M, Kiaei A, Hemmati M, Shohaimi S, Mohammadi M. Global prevalence of osteoporosis among the world older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Peralta M, Ramos M, Lipert A, Martins J, Marques A. Prevalence and trends of overweight and obesity in older adults from 10 European countries from 2005 to 2013. Scand J Public Health. 2018;46(5):522–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelly T, Yang W, Chen CS, Reynolds K, He J. Global burden of obesity in 2005 and projections to 2030. Int J Obes. 2008;32(9):1431–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou C, Zhan L, Yuan J, Tong X, Peng Y, Zha Y. Comparison of visceral, general and central obesity indices in the prediction of metabolic syndrome in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Eat Weight Disord. 2020;25(3):727–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rinonapoli G, Pace V, Ruggiero C, Ceccarini P, Bisaccia M, Meccariello L, Caraffa A. Obesity and bone: a complex relationship. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(24):2105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Court-Brown CM, Duckworth AD, Ralston S, McQueen MM. The relationship between obesity and fractures. Injury. 2019;50(8):1423–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fassio A, Idolazzi L, Rossini M, Gatti D, Adami G, Giollo A, Viapiana O. The obesity paradox and osteoporosis. Eat Weight Disord. 2018;23(3):293–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhawan D, Sharma S. Abdominal obesity, adipokines and non-communicable diseases. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;203:105737.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rose S, Maffulli N. Hip fractures: an epidemiological review. Bulletin. 1999;58(4):197–201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maffulli N, Aicale R. Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: a few things to know, and some to forget. Medicina. 2022;58(10):1314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Trivellas M, Eschweiler J, Hildebrand F, Betsch M. Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(4):2655–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. CDC, NHANES 2017–2018 Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry - Femur (DXXFEM_J), May, 2020. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2017-2018/DXXFEM_J.htm. (Accessed Jan 29 2021).

  13. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Qiao D, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang X, Qian X, Zhang H, Zhang G, Wang C. Association of obesity with bone mineral density and osteoporosis in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health. 2020;180:22–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Turcotte AF, O’Connor S, Morin SN, Gibbs JC, Willie BM, Jean S, Gagnon C. Association between obesity and risk of fracture, bone mineral density and bone quality in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(6):e0252487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Visscher TL, Heitmann BL, Rissanen A, Lahti-Koski M, Lissner L. A break in the obesity epidemic? Explained by biases or misinterpretation of the data ? Int J obesity. 2015;39(2):189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Traissac P, El Ati J. Trends in Obesity, NHANES 2003–2004 to 2013–2014: Is Waist Circumference Increasing Independently of BMI? Obesity. 2019;27(7):1043.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang CS, Chang YF, Wang MW, Chen CY, Chao YJ, Chang HJ, Kuo PH, Yang YC, Wu CH. Inverse relationship between central obesity and osteoporosis in osteoporotic drug naive elderly females: The Tianliao Old People (TOP) Study. J Clin Densitometry. 2013;16(2):204–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ağbaht K, Gürlek A, Karakaya J, Bayraktar M. Circulating adiponectin represents a biomarker of the association between adiposity and bone mineral density. Endocrine. 2009;35(3):371–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cui LH, Shin MH, Kweon SS, Choi JS, Rhee JA, Lee YH, Nam HS, Jeong SK, Park KS, Ryu SY, et al. Sex-related differences in the association between waist circumference and bone mineral density in a Korean population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:326.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim JH, Choi HJ, Kim MJ, Shin CS, Cho NH. Fat mass is negatively associated with bone mineral content in Koreans. Osteopor Int. 2012;23(7):2009–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen L, Liang J, Wen J, Huang H, Li L, Lin W, Zong L, Wang N, Cai L, Tang K, et al. Is waist circumference a negative predictor of calcaneal bone mineral density in adult Chinese men with normal weight? Annals Transl Med. 2019;7(9):201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ofir O, Buch A, Rouach V, Goldsmith R, Stern N, Monsonego-Ornan E. Association between abdominal obesity and fragility fractures among elderly Israeli women. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020;32(8):1459–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tencerova M, Frost M, Figeac F, Nielsen TK, Ali D, Lauterlein JL, Andersen TL, Haakonsson AK, Rauch A, Madsen JS, et al. Obesity-associated hypermetabolism and accelerated senescence of bone marrow stromal stem cells suggest a potential mechanism for bone fragility. Cell Rep. 2019;27(7):2050-2062.e2056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Faienza MF, D’Amato G, Chiarito M, Colaianni G, Colucci S, Grano M, Corbo F, Brunetti G. Mechanisms involved in childhood obesity-related bone fragility. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdallah BM, Kassem M. New factors controlling the balance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis. Bone. 2012;50(2):540–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang Q, Riddle RC, Yang Q, Rosen CR, Guttridge DC, Dirckx N, Faugere MC, Farber CR, Clemens TL. The RNA demethylase FTO is required for maintenance of bone mass and functions to protect osteoblasts from genotoxic damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(36):17980–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff and the participants of the NHANES study for their valuable contributions.

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Endocrinology, Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou, 311200, Zhejiang, China

    Jun Chen

  2. Department of Osteoporosis Care and Control, Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou, 311200, Zhejiang, China

    Liming Zhu, Xiaocong Yao & Zhongxin Zhu

  3. Department of Clinical Research Center, Xiaoshan Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Hangzhou, 311200, Zhejiang, China

    Zhongxin Zhu

Authors
  1. Jun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liming Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaocong Yao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhongxin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongxin Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics review board of the National Center for Health Statistics approved all NHANES protocols and written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Zhu, L., Yao, X. et al. The association between abdominal obesity and femoral neck bone mineral density in older adults. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03654-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03654-3

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X