Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Biomechanical comparison of different screw-included angles in crossing screw fixation for transverse patellar fracture in level walking: a quasi-dynamic finite element study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 18, Article number: 5 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

A minimally invasive technique with various screw configurations without open surgery is currently used for the fixation of transverse patellar fractures. Percutaneous crossing screw configuration has been reported to have a good bone union rate in patellar fractures. However, the difference in mechanical stability of the fractured patella between different screw-included angles has not been fully investigated. Hence, this study aims to compare the mechanical stability of parallel and crossing screw fixations with different screw-included angles for the fixation of transverse patellar fractures during level walking.

Methods

A finite element knee model containing a patella with a transverse fracture is created. Two headless compression screws with different angles (0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°) are used to fix the fracture. The loading conditions of the knee joint during level walking are used to compare the stability of the fractured patella with different fixation screw configurations.

Results

The results indicate that the maximum fracture gap opening distance increased with an increase in the included angle. Two parallel screws yield the smallest gap distance among all screw configurations. The maximum gap opening distances at the anterior leading edge of the fractured patella with two parallel screws and two screws having an included angle of 90° are 0.73 mm and 1.31 mm, respectively, at 15% walking cycle.

Conclusions

Based on these results, the superior performance of two parallel screws over crossing screw fixations in the fixation of transverse patellar fractures is established. Furthermore, the smaller the angle between the crossing screws, the better is the stability of the fractured patella.

Introduction

The patella, embedded in the patellar tendon, plays an important role in transferring the quadriceps force to the tibia to develop the extensor mechanism of the knee joint [1]. The extensor mechanism of the knee joint is essential for normal walking and daily activity. When the patella is fractured, the extensor mechanism is interrupted and knee movement is blocked. Unfortunately, patellar fracture is a common disorder that orthopedic surgeons encounter in clinical examination, particularly in the emergency room [2, 3]. Surgical intervention is suggested for cases of displaced patellar fractures to firmly fix the patellar fragments and restore the knee extensor mechanism to enable walking [4, 5]. In addition, surgical intervention allows early activity to avoid complications due to long-term immobilization of the knee joint.

To date, several surgical approaches have been proposed for the management of patellar fractures, including tension band wiring, cerclage, modified tension bands, pins or screws, and combined approaches [6,7,8,9,10]. According to the literature, more than half of those cases with patellar fracture accepted tension band wiring from 2003 to 2015, while the combined approach has increased recently [11]. The major advantage of the combined approach, such as cannulated screws along with an anterior wire, is its excellent stability [12, 13]. Cannulated screws along with an anterior wire were also reported to be superior to tension band wiring in the literature [14]. However, the major disadvantage of cannulated screws with an anterior wire is delayed healing and pain after surgery due to damage to the soft tissue because of open surgery [15,16,17]. Hence, several studies have focused on minimally invasive surgery without the anterior wire and with a specific cable-pin system, two and three parallel headless compression screws, and full-thread screws to enhance the healing process and reduce pain [12, 13, 18, 19].

A percutaneous crossing screw configuration without an anterior wire has also been proposed to achieve a good union rate for patellar fractures [20]. However, the difference in mechanical stability of the fractured patella between the two parallel screws and two crossing screws during daily walking is unclear. Hence, the aim of this study is to compare the stability of the fractured patella with different screw-included angles in the fixation of transverse patellar fractures in level walking by using finite element (FE) simulation. The reason for using FE simulation is the strength in solving such a highly nonlinear lading of the patella during walking. FE modeling has been used in many biomechanical studies, particularly with complex geometries and loadings [21].

Method

Solid modeling

A knee joint model containing the patella, distal femur, proximal tibia, and fibula was developed based on the computer tomographic images of a healthy man with a body weight of 70 kg and height of 170 cm. The images were obtained when the subject was lying supine; hence, the knee model was created in the full extension position. The areas of the cortical and cancellous bone in the images were isolated out by the higher gray values than the surrounding soft tissues. The 3D model of the bones was then developed by stacking the isolated bony areas. It was subsequently imported into the CAD software, SolidWorks 2019, to create the cartilage and meniscus. The thickness of the cartilage of the patella, distal femoral, and proximal tibia was set at 1 mm based on the literature [22]. The space between the cartilage was created as a meniscus. The transverse fracture type AO 34-C1 at the middle of the patella was used in this study (Fig. 1a). The transverse fracture was created by a virtual plane; hence, no gaps existed after the section. After the fracture was created, a 4.5 mm headless compression screw (HCS, DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, US) was used to fix the fractured patellar fragments (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patella (a) and headless compression screw (b) used in the simulation

Full size image

To investigate the effect of the included angle of the screws in crossing fixations, three crossing angles were considered: 30°, 60°, and 90°. Furthermore, in the crossing screws, there are two different screw configurations: the anterior screw inward and anterior screw outward. In addition to cross-fixation, traditional parallel screw fixation was used for comparison. Two parallel screws were placed in the middle third of the patella in the front plane. The proximity of the screws was approximately half of the thickness of the patella. Additionally, the currently used anterior wire in a figure of eight with two parallel screws was used for validation. The diameter of the anterior wire was set at 1 mm. The length of the screws ranged from 35 to 40 mm, and the thread length was 12 mm. The thread was controlled to avoid passing through the fracture site; hence, compression and separation of the fractured patellar fragments under loading were allowed. In total, eight different configurations were used (Fig. 2): two parallel screws (Para), two parallel screws with anterior wire (Para&Wire), crossing 30°with the anterior screw inward (X30-AI), crossing 30°with the anterior screw outward (X30-AO), crossing 60°with the anterior screw inward (X60-AI), crossing 60°with the anterior screw outward (X60-AO), crossing 90°with the anterior screw inward (X90-AI), and crossing 90°with the anterior screw outward (X90-AO).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Screw configurations used in the present study

Full size image

FE modeling

The model was imported into ANSYS Workbench 2022 for simulation. A quadratic tetrahedron element (solid 187) was used to mesh the complex model, including the bone, cartilage, screw, and wire. The ligaments of the knee joint were reconstructed using tension-only springs in the ANSYS Workbench. In total, five ligaments (Table 1), namely the patellar, medial collateral, lateral collateral, anterior cruciate, and posterior cruciate ligaments, were created in the FE model. The stiffness of the spring was defined based on literatures [23,24,25,26]. The material properties of the bone, cartilage, and meniscus were set according to literature (Table 2) [27,28,29,30,31]. The material properties of the metal were used based on the engineering database in the ANSYS Workbench. All the materials were as assumed to be linear elastic, isotropic, and homogeneous.

Table 1 The stiffness of the springs used in this study
Full size table
Table 2 The material properties used in this study
Full size table

Model validation and convergence test

A convergence test was conducted with the Para model in the full extension position to confirm that the mesh status of the FE model was stable. The total number of elements was increased by globally reducing the edge length of the element to confirm the stability of the numerical model. The maximum gap distance between the fractured patella and contact area between the patellar fragments were used as indices. After convergence, to validate the present FE model, the rotational degree in the sagittal plane of the patellar fragment Para&Wire model was compared to the proposed result in a cadaveric study [32].

Walking simulation

After validation and convergence, the motion of the knee joint during level walking was simulated by applying rotational degrees to the femur. Normalized displacement was applied to the superior surface of the femur, while the distal end of the tibia and fibula were completely fixed (Fig. 3). In total, 20 positions with a sequential increment of 5% in the walking cycle were used (Table 3). All internals were consistent, and the endpoint of the interval was the starting point of the following interval. Linear interpolation was used for each interval. In addition to the displacement, a quadriceps force parallel to the long axis of the femur was applied to the base surface of the fractured patella. The applied degree and force data were set based on a previous study [33]. During the late swing phase, quadriceps force was set to 1 N for solving.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Finite element model and boundary conditions for walking simulation

Full size image
Table 3 The used gait data in this study
Full size table

Index

The gap opening distances at the anterior, medial, and lateral sides of the fracture gap during walking were used as indices for comparison. Furthermore, the change in the contact area between the proximal and distal patellar fragments with different configurations during walking was plotted for comparison.

Results

Convergence and validation

The difference in maximum gap opening distance at the anterior gap was 1.4% (from 0.72 to 0.71 mm) between 452 053 and 3 208 329 nodes. Additionally, the difference in the contact area between the patellar fragments was 1.4% (from 90.1 to 91.4 mm2) between 452 053 and 3 208 329 nodes (Fig. 4a and b). Furthermore, the rotational stiffness of the Para&Wire model was similar to that in a previous study [32]. The results of the rotational stiffness in the present and published studies were 453 N/degree and 510 (SD 362) N/degree, respectively (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of gap opening distance (a) and contact area (b) in the convergence test, and rotational stiffness in the validation (c)

Full size image

Gap distance

The fractured patella separated at the anterior surface, and a large gap was developed, while the posterior aspect remained in contact with each other during walking (Fig. 5). Parallel screw fixation, regardless of whether the anterior wire was used, yielded a smaller gap opening distance than crossing screw fixation. Furthermore, the maximum gap opening distance during walking increased with an increase in the included angle in the crossed screws. In stance phase, the maximum gap opening distance of X90.AO was 1.25 (Fig. 6), 1.01 (Fig. 7) and 0.63 mm (Fig. 8) at anterior, medial, and lateral site of the gap, respectively, at 15% of the walking cycle. In swing phase, the maximum gap opening distance of X90.AO was 0.57, 0.4 and 0.16 mm at the anterior, medial, and lateral site of the gap, respectively, at 60% of the walking cycle. In general, the anterior gap opening distance was larger than the medial and lateral gaps during the walking cycle.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Movement of the knee joint in the simulation

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Anterior gap opening distance during walking cycle

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Medial gap opening distance during walking cycle

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Lateral gap opening distance during walking cycle

Full size image

Contact area

The contact area of the patellar fragments at the fracture site with parallel screw fixations was obviously larger than that with crossing screw fixations in the stance phase (5–30% of the walking cycle) (Fig. 9). The contact areas in the fracture patella with different fixations were similar during the swing phase. The maximum contact areas in the Para model were 176 mm2 and 280 mm2 in the stance phase and swing phase, respectively. The difference in contact area between parallel screw fixation with and without anterior fixation was very minor.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Contact area between the fragments during walking cycle

Full size image

Discussion

This novel study demonstrates loading on a fractured patella with different screw configurations in level walking. The present simulation could demonstrate the difference in fracture gap deformation between the stance and swing phases of the walking cycle. The loading conditions of the patella differ during walking, and the direction of the muscle force changes during knee flexion and extension. In most previous studies, a worst-case loading condition of the fractured patella was assumed, and the gap opening distance was demonstrated at specific knee flexion angles [12, 32, 34]. In this simulation, the loading condition was extended to the entire walking cycle. Determining the gap opening of the fractured patella with different screw fixations is helpful to surgeons and physical therapists in the decision-making process of postoperative care.

Patellar fracture is a common fracture encountered by orthopedic surgeons in clinical practice. The treatment strategy for fractures is still evolving because new devices and surgical approaches are continuously being proposed. In recent years, the conventional approach, that is, tension band wiring, has gradually decreased, while the combined approach has become popular [11]. Some specific systems with minimally invasive techniques, such as the cable-pin system, have been proposed to reduce post-surgery pain compared with conventional approaches [18]. In addition, many approaches with percutaneous screw fixation without the anterior wire, such as two parallel headless compression screws, two parallel full-thread screws, crossing screws, and triangular screw configurations, have been proposed recently [12, 13, 20, 35]. All approaches satisfy the criteria of a minimally invasive technique.

Crossing screw fixation with a minimally invasive technique for transverse patellar fractures was proposed to achieve a good union rate in previous studies [20]. In a previous study, the two screws were placed nearly perpendicular to each other during fixation. In the present study, three different screw-included angles were employed, and the effect of the screw angle on the stability of the fractured patella was compared. The results indicated that the gap opening distance increased with an increase in the included angle. The major loading on the fractured patella comes from the quadriceps force and the distal femoral condyle, which develops a torque on the sagittal plane. The anterior leading surface of the fracture opened under such torque. Under such loading conditions, the screw location was closer to the anterior surface of the patella, and higher stability was obtained. One of the screws in the crossing fixation was deeper than that in the parallel screw fixation; hence, the stability with crossing fixations was lower than that with parallel screw fixation.

In the present simulation, the results indicated that the stability of the fractured patella with crossed screw fixation was lower than that with parallel screw fixation. However, crossed screw fixation with an included angle of 90 °was reported to achieve good clinical outcomes [20]. Mechanical stability is not the only factor affecting fracture healing. A minimally invasive approach that can provide sufficient blood supply with preservation of the periosteum and stabilization of the fracture is one of the options usually considered by the surgeon in fracture fixation [18, 35,36,37]. Percutaneous crossing screw fixation is performed using a minimally invasive technique without open surgery; hence, the outcome of bone healing is favorable. Additionally, good postoperative care, including protection of the fractured bone, remains indispensable.

The use of an anterior wire has been shown to achieve higher stability than that without it [19, 38]. However, the most critical aspect of the anterior region is the damage to the soft tissue surrounding the fractured patella [16]. Many studies have indicated lesser pain after surgery in cases without the anterior wire than in cases without the anterior wire [18]. In our previous studies, the effect of the anterior wire on the stability of the fractured patella was not obvious when the screw was superficially placed [19]. In the present study, screw proximity was similar to that in the previous study, and more complex loading conditions were applied to the fractured patella with and without the anterior wire. However, the differences in the gap opening distance and contact area in the walking cycle with and without the anterior wire were still very minor. This indicates that the effect of the anterior wire on the stability of the fractured patella was related to screw proximity, regardless of the flexion degree of the knee joint.

The present quasi-dynamic simulation has several limitations. First, inertial force was not considered in the simulation. Second, the motion and force data for the boundary conditions were not directly measured from the subject who accepted the CT scan and provided CT images. Third, only the quadriceps force was considered, and the muscle forces from the hamstring and gastrocnemius were not considered. Fourth, the ligaments around the knee joint were simplified as a spring, and all the materials were simplified as linear elastic, isotropic, and homogeneous.

Conclusion

This novel FE simulation of knee model can represent the mechanical responses of a fractured patella with different screw fixations during level walking, and the fracture gap opening distance and contact area between fragments are demonstrated. Based on these results, the two parallel screws are noticed to have superior performance than the crossing screw fixations in the management of transverse patellar fractures with headless compression screws. Furthermore, the smaller the angle between the crossing screws, the better the stability of the fractured patella when two headless compression screws are used.

Availability of data and materials

All the data will be available upon motivated request to the corresponding author of the present paper.

Abbreviations

FE:

Finite element

Para:

Two parallel screws

Para&Wire:

Two parallel screws with anterior wire

X30-AI:

Crossing 30° with the anterior screw inward

X30-AO:

Crossing 30° with the anterior screw outward

X60-AI:

Crossing 60° with the anterior screw inward

X60-AO:

Crossing 60° with the anterior screw outward

X90-AI:

Crossing 90° with the anterior screw inward

X90-AO:

Crossing 90° with the anterior screw outward

References

  1. Kakazu R, Archdeacon MT. Surgical management of patellar fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47:77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen P, Court-Brown CM, Vedel JO, Vistrup S, Elsoe R. Incidence and epidemiology of patellar fractures. Orthopedics. 2016;39:e1154–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Melvin JS, Mehta S. Patellar fractures in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:198–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Henrichsen JL, Wilhem SK, Siljander MP, Kalma JJ, Karadsheh MS. Treatment of patella fractures. Orthopedics. 2018;41:e747–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Catalano JB, Iannacone WM, Marczyk S, Dalsey RM, Deutsch LS, Born CT, et al. Open fractures of the patella: long-term functional outcome. J Trauma. 1995;39:439–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sun Y, Sheng K, Li Q, Wang D, Zhou D. Management of comminuted patellar fracture fixation using modified cerclage wiring. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monaco E, Bruni G, Daggett M, Saithna A, Cardarelli S, Proietti L, et al. Patellar fracture fixation using suture tape cerclage. Arthrosc Tech. 2020;9:e783–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang C, Zhao Y, Deng K. Modified two-tension-band for patellar fractures. J Int Med Res. 2020;48:300060519893495.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elkin DM, Galloway JD, Koury K, Ni JJ, Reilly MC, Adams MR, et al. Patella fracture fixation with a non-locked anterior plating technique: a biomechanical study. Injury. 2021;52:686–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Banks KE, Ambrose CG, Wheeless JS, Tissue CM, Sen M. An alternative patellar fracture fixation: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Byun SE, Sim JA, Joo YB, Kim JW, Choi W, Na YG, et al. Changes in patellar fracture characteristics: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1596 patellar fracture cases between 2003 and 2017. Injury. 2019;50:2287–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen YN, Chang CW, Chang HC, Yang TH, Chang CJ, Li CT, et al. Triangular configuration with headless compression screws in the fixation of transverse patellar fracture. Injury. 2022;53:698–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang CW, Chen CH, Li CT, Chen YN, Yang TH, Chang CJ, et al. Role of an additional third screw in the fixation of transverse patellar fracture with two parallel cannulated screw and anterior wire. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tian Y, Zhou F, Ji H, Zhang Z, Guo Y. Cannulated screw and cable are superior to modified tension band in the treatment of transverse patella fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3429–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deasey MJ, Moran TE, Lesevic M, Burnett ZR, Diduch DR. Small, short, oblique patellar tunnels for patellar fixation do not increase fracture risk or complications in MPFL reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8:2325967120954430.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Petrie J, Sassoon A, Langford J. Complications of patellar fracture repair: treatment and results. J Knee Surg. 2013;26:309–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith ST, Cramer KE, Karges DE, Watson JT, Moed BR. Early complications in the operative treatment of patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:183–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mao N, Liu D, Ni H, Tang H, Zhang Q. Comparison of the cable pin system with conventional open surgery for transverse patella fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2361–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen CH, Chen YN, Li CT, Chang CW, Chang CH, Peng YT. Roles of the screw types, proximity and anterior band wiring in the surgical fixation of transverse patellar fractures: a finite element investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ali M, Alzahrani A-W. Percutaneous crossing screws, a novel technique for transverse patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma Surg Related Res. 2017;2:12.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Park S, Lee S, Yoon J, Chae SW. Finite element analysis of knee and ankle joint during gait based on motion analysis. Med Eng Phys. 2019;63:33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Antons J, Marascio MGM, Nohava J, Martin R, Applegate LA, Bourban PE, et al. Zone-dependent mechanical properties of human articular cartilage obtained by indentation measurements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018;29:57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Livesay GA, Harner CD, Xerogeanes JW, Carlin GJ, Kusayama T, Fujie H, et al. Anatomy and biomechanics of the human posterior cruciate ligament. In: Hirasawa Y, Sledge CB, Woo SLY, editors., et al., Clinical biomechanics and related research. Tokyo: Springer; 1994. p. 200–14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Woo SL, Hollis JM, Adams DJ, Lyon RM, Takai S. Tensile properties of the human femur-anterior cruciate ligament-tibia complex. The effects of specimen age and orientation. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19:217–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson WT, Deakin AH, Payne AP, Picard F, Wearing SC. Comparative analysis of the structural properties of the collateral ligaments of the human knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stäubli HU, Schatzmann L, Brunner P, Rincón L, Nolte LP. Quadriceps tendon and patellar ligament: cryosectional anatomy and structural properties in young adults. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4:100–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheal EJ, Spector M, Hayes WC. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 1992;10:405–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rho JY. An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of human tibial cortical and cancellous bone. Ultrasonics. 1996;34:777–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kerrigan JR, Sanchez-Molina D, Neggers J, Arregui-Dalmases C, Velazquez-Ameijide J, Crandall JR. Indentation response of human patella with elastic modulus correlation to localized fractal dimension and bone mineral density. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;33:99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Silver FH, Bradica G, Tria A. Elastic energy storage in human articular cartilage: estimation of the elastic modulus for type II collagen and changes associated with osteoarthritis. Matrix Biol. 2002;21:129–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goertzen DJ, Budney DR, Cinats JG. Methodology and apparatus to determine material properties of the knee joint meniscus. Med Eng Phys. 1997;19:412–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin JM, Applin DT, McGrady LM, Wang M, Schmeling GJ. Biomechanical comparison of tension band fixation of patella transverse fracture: headless screws versus headed screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:e240–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sasaki K, Neptune RR. Individual muscle contributions to the axial knee joint contact force during normal walking. J Biomech. 2010;43:2780–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Karakasli A, Acar N, Ertem F, Ozmanevra R, Erduran M. A novel anatomical patellar plate for transverse patellar fracture-A biomechanical in-vitro study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51:337–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jia X, Wu Y, Rui Y, Ma Y, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Percutaneous minimally invasive treatment of transverse patellar fracture using cannulated screws combined with high-strength sutures and Nice knots: a retrospective study. Ann Palliat Med. 2022;11:1085–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhai Q, Yang J, Zhuang J, Gao R, Chen M. Percutaneous cerclage wiring for type 34-C patella fracture in geriatric patients. Injury. 2020;51:1362–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lo CH, Chen CH. Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous fixation and open reduction internal fixation for patella fractures: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chang CW, Chen YN, Li CT, Chung YH, Chang CH, Peng YT. Role of screw proximity in the fixation of transverse patellar fractures with screws and a wire. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018;26:2309499018789705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by [the National Science and Technology Council (Taiwan)] Grant Number [110-2221-E-006 -012 -MY2].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Chih-Wei Chang

  2. Department of Orthopedics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Chih-Wei Chang

  3. Department of Physical Therapy, Asia University, NO.500, Lioufeng Rd., Wufeng, Taichung, 413305, Taiwan

    Yen-Nien Chen

  4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Hung-Chih Chang

  5. Institute of Geriatric Welfare Technology & Science, MacKay Medical College, No.46, Sec. 3, Zhongzheng Rd., Sanzhi Dist., New Taipei City, 25245, Taiwan

    Chun-Ting Li

Authors
  1. Chih-Wei Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yen-Nien Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hung-Chih Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chun-Ting Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C-WC contributed to conceptualization; Y-NC contributed to data curation; Y-NC contributed to methodology; H-CC contributed to supervision; H-CC contributed to validation; C-TL contributed to writing – original draft; C-TL contributed to writing – review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yen-Nien Chen or Chun-Ting Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, CW., Chen, YN., Chang, HC. et al. Biomechanical comparison of different screw-included angles in crossing screw fixation for transverse patellar fracture in level walking: a quasi-dynamic finite element study. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03482-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03482-x

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X