Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Association between serum ferritin and bone mineral density in US adults

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 17, Article number: 494 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The association between serum ferritin and bone mineral density (BMD) is still controversial. This study aims to investigate the association of serum ferritin level with BMD in US adults.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study consisting of 8445 participants from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD were used as independent variables and dependent variables, respectively. We evaluated the association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD through a weighted multivariable linear regression model. Subgroup and interaction analysis was also performed in this study.

Results

After adjusting for other confounding factors, serum ferritin was negatively correlated with lumbar spine BMD [β =  − 0.090, 95% CI (− 0.135, − 0.045)]. Further subgroup analysis found that the strongest negative association mainly exists in females aged over 45 years [β =  − 0.169, 95% CI (− 0.259, − 0.079)], and this association is not significant in other groups.

Conclusions

The results found that the association between serum ferritin and lumber spine BMD differed by gender and age. Increased level of serum ferritin may indicate a higher risk of osteoporosis or osteopenia in females aged over 45 years.

Introduction

Osteoporosis is a complex and chronic disorder, resulting in a progressive reduction in bone strength and enhanced bone fragility with susceptibility to fractures [1, 2]. Osteoporotic fractures are associated with excess mortality and decreased functional capacity and quality of life [3]. Osteoporotic fractures have a huge impact economically, in addition to their effect on health: The cost to the US economy is around $17.9 billion per annum, with the burden to the UK being almost £4 billion [4]. Low bone mineral density (BMD) is an important risk factor of fracture, and treatment is strongly recommended in those with a BMD below a critical value [5]. Therefore, identifying risk factors of low BMD is vital for the prevention and management of osteoporosis.

Ferritin is a large protein formed by apoferritin and iron core Fe3+ [6]. Ferritin plays a key role in the regulation of iron metabolism, and it can reflect iron stores in individuals [7,8,9]. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently defines iron overload as ferritin concentrations > 200 for males and > 150 for females of all ages above 5 years [10]. Iron overload has been thought to be associated with diseases such as cancers, heart attack, heart failure and diabetes mellitus [11, 12]. Several studies have also shown that the incidence of osteoporosis and fractures increases significantly in diseases related to iron overload, such as hemochromatosis, thalassemia, and cirrhosis [13,14,15]. In this regard, there is ongoing research involved in detecting of the association of serum ferritin with BMD. Two studies reported that serum ferritin was inversely associated with the BMD values at the lumbar spine and femur neck in Korean women aged over 45 years [16, 17]. However, another study suggested that serum ferritin was positively associated with BMD of the total lumbar spine, total femur, and femur neck in elderly South Korean men [18]. A negative and linear association between serum ferritin and BMD was demonstrated in aged 12 to 49 American women; however, some important factors affecting bone metabolism, including serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), serum calcium, serum uric acid, were not fully adjusted as confounding factors [19].

Accordingly, the aim of this study was to analyzed the association between serum ferritin levels and lumbar spine BMD in US adults using data from the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database (1999–2006).

Materials and methods

Study population

The National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) is a population-based national survey, providing information regarding the nutrition and health of the American population using a complex, stratified, multistage, clustered probability sampling design. The NHANES database is available publicly at www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes. In this study, we collected data in four cycles of NHANES, from 1999 to 2006.

In total, 41,474 individuals participated in the health examination surveys between 1999 and 2006. The study population was restricted to adults aged 20–85 years (n = 20,311). Of the eligible group, 10,685 individuals were missing data on serum ferritin or BMD, and another 1181 were missing data on other covariate. Finally, 8445 participants were included in the analysis after applying these exclusion criteria (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of sample selection

Full size image

Variables

In this study, the independent variable was serum ferritin. The dependent variable was lumbar spine BMD measured by the dual-energy X-ray (DEXA) scans. We selected these confounders on the basis of their associations with the outcomes of interest or a change in effect estimate of more than 10% [20]. The following variables were included in final analysis as covariates: age, gender, race, education, physical activity, body mass index, serum calcium, total cholesterol, serum albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and serum uric acid. The examination parts related to physiological, clinical, and laboratory evaluations were all carried out by well-trained medical experts. The detailed information of each variable is publicly available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.

Statistical analysis

All analyses used NHANES examination sample weights that adjust for nonresponse, noncoverage, and unequal probabilities of selection. In the descriptive analysis, continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation; categorical variables were reported as percentages. Weighted multivariable linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD. We constructed three distinct models using weighted univariate and multivariable linear regression models. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted according to age and gender. P values less than 0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant. Modeling was performed with the statistical software packages R (http://www.R-project.org, The R Foundation).

Results

A total of 8,445 participants aged 20–85 years were included in this study. The weighted socio-demographic and medical characteristics of these participants subclassified based on serum ferritin tertiles (Q1: 3–44 ng/mL; Q2: 45–108 ng/mL; Q3: 109–365 ng/mL) are shown in Table 1. Participants in the highest serum ferritin tertiles were more likely to be men, whites, with lower values of lumber spine BMD and higher total cholesterol, alkaline phosphatase, and serum uric acid.

Table 1 Weighted characteristics of 8445 participants included in this study
Full size table

Weighted multivariable linear regression model was constructed (Table 2). In the unadjusted model, serum ferritin was negatively correlated with lumbar spine BMD [β =  − 0.107, 95% CI (− 0.148, − 0.067)]. After adjusting for confounding factors, this negative association still existed in Model 2 [β =  − 0.087, 95% CI (− 0.133, − 0.041)] and Model 3 [β =  − 0.090, 95% CI (− 0.135, − 0.045)]. Stratified by tertiles of serum ferritin, the trend test remained significant between them (P for trend < 0.0001).

Table 2 Association of serum ferritin with lumbar spine bone mineral density in 8445 participants aged 20–85 years
Full size table

On subgroup analysis (Table 3), we observed the association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD stratified by demographic variables. When stratified by gender, a significant negative association existed in females [β =  − 0.089, 95% CI (− 0.155, − 0.024)], not in males [β =  − 0.057, 95% CI (− 0.120, − 0.006)]. When stratified by age, serum ferritin was negatively correlated with lumbar spine BMD in participants aged over 45 years [β =  − 0.097, 95% CI (− 0.159, − 0.036)], and no significant association was found in participants aged below 45 years [β =  − 0.062, 95% CI (− 0.128, 0.004)]. We further observed that the association between serum ferritin levels and lumbar spine BMD mainly exists in females aged over 45 years [β =  − 0.169, 95% CI (− 0.259, − 0.079)]. This negative relationship was not significant in other subgroups.

Table 3 Subgroup analysis of serum ferritin with lumbar spine bone mineral density, stratified by age and gender
Full size table

Interaction analyses revealed that the association between serum ferritin levels and lumbar spine BMD was modified by age and gender (Table 3). The association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD was stronger among participants aged over 45 years (β =  − 0.097 vs. − 0.062, Pint = 0.0249), among female (β =  − 0.089 vs. − 0.057, Pint = 0.0007). Also, the female aged over 45 years had the highest estimate value between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD than other groups (β =  − 0.169).

Discussion

This study was set out to investigate whether serum ferritin is independently associated with lumbar spine BMD. The studied population was a nationally representative and large sample of US adults aged 20–85 years. We found that serum ferritin concentration was negatively associated with lumbar spine BMD in US adults, particularly in females aged over 45 years.

Ferritin is an iron storage protein that regulated post-transcriptionally by cellular iron status via iron responsive elements in its messenger RNA [21]. Serum ferritin level is a routinely available indicator with well-described associations with iron status, and it has been widely used as an indicator of iron overload [22, 23]. Osteoporosis is a metabolic disease characterized by a systemic impairment of bone mass and results from the imbalance between bone resorption and bone formation [24]. Some biological studies have been conducted to confirm the exact effects of iron overload on osteoporosis. Yuan et al. [25] showed that iron accumulation inhibited mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) quantity and decreased bone mineral density and spatial structural parameters in vivo mice model. He et al. [26] noted that iron overload probably inhibited osteoblast function through higher oxidative stress following increased intracellular iron concentration. On the other hand, various studies reported that iron overload stimulated osteoclast differentiation [27, 28] and aggravated the effects of ovariectomy on bone mass [29]. Meanwhile, some clinical studies have been conducted in order to determine the association between osteoporosis and iron overload-related diseases. In subjects with genetic hemochromatosis, the femur neck BMD appears to fall with rising hepatic iron concentration, and osteoporosis was highly influenced by the degree of iron overload which plays an independent role in the acceleration of bone loss [15, 30]. Iron overload is one of the most important factors in the development of thalassemia-associated osteoporosis and exerts both direct and indirect effects on bone metabolism [31].

Thus, a number of studies focus on the association of serum ferritin with BMD. The negative relationship between serum ferritin and BMD was demonstrated in Korean women [16, 17]; nevertheless, a positive relationship was found in elderly Korean men [18]. In a population-based cross-sectional study, an inverse association of serum ferritin with BMD was detected in American women aged 12–49 years [19]. However, some important factors affecting bone metabolism, including serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), serum calcium, serum uric acid, were not fully adjusted as confounding factors evidence. In this study, we controlled for the potential confounding variables including demographic, nutrition status, and bone metabolism. In agreement with previous studies [16, 17], our findings indicated that a higher serum ferritin level was associated with a lower lumbar spine BMD in females aged over 45 years. On the other hand, a positive association between ferritin and BMD was found in elderly in South Korean and Iran [18, 32]. We speculated that the correlation between ferritin and BMD may be affected by different populations. Therefore, more prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm the association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD.

Age-related changes of BMD are demonstrated to be influenced by gender, hormonal change, and ethnicity. Specifically, age-related decline in BMD is more pronounced in women than in men [33]. In addition, several studies showed a significant bone loss even in perimenopausal women prior to their menopause [34, 35]. In this regard, we adopted 45 years old as the cutoff points for age stratification both in women and men to obtain a comparable analysis in this study. Similar to previous studies [16, 17], a stronger negative association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD was observed only in women aged over 45 years. The discrepancy could be explained by sudden loss of estrogen in these women, besides gender difference. Decreased estrogen level led to a corresponding decrease in the function of iron response elements, followed by increased iron storage in the body [14, 36]. In addition, estrogen deficiency during menopause can lead to bone loss through complex interplay of hormones and cytokines that converge to disrupt the process of bone remodeling [37]. Therefore, these present results further confirmed the positive association between iron overload and BMD.

In this study, we used the NHANES database, which includes a representative sample of multiethnic population. The large sample size allows us to better conduct subgroup analysis. In addition, we selected the population by rigorous inclusion criteria and adjusted for potential confounding factors as much as possible. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of our study. Firstly, the cross-sectional design of our study means that it impossible to determine the causal relationship between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD. Secondly, the lumbar spine, the intertrochanteric area, and the femoral neck are currently the most commonly used regions for evaluation of BMD. However, BMD of the intertrochanteric area and the femoral neck were not available in most of the included participants and we only examined the association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD. Thirdly, although we adjusted for potential known confounding factors, residual or unmeasured confounder may alter our observed results. Therefore, further prospective clinical and basic mechanistic studies are needed to confirm the association between serum ferritin and lumbar spine BMD.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that serum ferritin level was negatively correlated with lumbar spine BMD in females aged over 45 years. Increased level of serum ferritin may indicate a higher risk of osteoporosis or osteopenia in these women. Further basic and clinical studies are needed to clarify the exact effect of serum ferritin on lumbar spine BMD.

Abbreviations

BMD:

Bone mineral density

NHANES:

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

References

  1. Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393(10169):364–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(1):23–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morin SN, Lix LM, Majumdar SR, Leslie WD. Temporal trends in the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11(4):263–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8(1):137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P, Dawson-Hughes B, De Laet C, et al. A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(7):527–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arosio P, Carmona F, Gozzelino R, Maccarinelli F, Poli M. The importance of eukaryotic ferritins in iron handling and cytoprotection. Biochem J. 2015;472(1):1–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Casal MN, Pasricha SR, Martinez RX, Lopez-Perez L, Peña-Rosas JP. Are current serum and plasma ferritin cut-offs for iron deficiency and overload accurate and reflecting iron status? A systematic review. Arch Med Res. 2018;49(6):405–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Orino K, Lehman L, Tsuji Y, Ayaki H, Torti SV, Torti FM. Ferritin and the response to oxidative stress. Biochem J. 2001;357(Pt 1):241–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mei Z, Cogswell ME, Parvanta I, Lynch S, Beard JL, Stoltzfus RJ, et al. Hemoglobin and ferritin are currently the most efficient indicators of population response to iron interventions: an analysis of nine randomized controlled trials. J Nutr. 2005;135(8):1974–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. World Health Organization. Serum ferritin concentrations for the assessment of iron status and iron deficiency in populations. 2011. http://www.who.int/vmnis/indicators/serum_ferritin.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2018.

  11. Fonseca-Nunes A, Jakszyn P, Agudo A. Iron and cancer risk—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2014;23(1):12–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gujja P, Rosing DR, Tripodi DJ, Shizukuda Y. Iron overload cardiomyopathy: better understanding of an increasing disorder. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(13):1001–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vogiatzi MG, Macklin EA, Fung EB, Cheung AM, Vichinsky E, Olivieri N, et al. Bone disease in thalassemia: a frequent and still unresolved problem. J Bone Miner Res. 2009;24(3):543–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jian J, Pelle E, Huang X. Iron and menopause: does increased iron affect the health of postmenopausal women? Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11(12):2939–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Guggenbuhl P, Deugnier Y, Boisdet JF, Rolland Y, Perdriger A, Pawlotsky Y, et al. Bone mineral density in men with genetic hemochromatosis and HFE gene mutation. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(12):1809–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahn SH, Lee S, Kim H, Lee SH, Kim BJ, Koh JM. Higher serum ferritin level and lower femur neck strength in women at the stage of bone loss (≥ 45 years of age): the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV). Endocr Res. 2016;41(4):334–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim BJ, Lee SH, Koh JM, Kim GS. The association between higher serum ferritin level and lower bone mineral density is prominent in women ≥45 years of age (KNHANES 2008–2010). Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(10):2627–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee KS, Jang JS, Lee DR, Kim YH, Nam GE, Han BD, et al. Serum ferritin levels are positively associated with bone mineral density in elderly Korean men: the 2008–2010 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. J Bone Miner Metab. 2014;32(6):683–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu M, Liu Y, Shao M, Tesfaye GC, Yang S. Associations of iron intake, serum iron and serum ferritin with bone mineral density in women: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2010. Calcif Tissue Int. 2020;106(3):232–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feuer AJ, Thai A, Demmer RT, Vogiatzi M. Association of stimulant medication use with bone mass in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(12):e162804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daru J, Colman K, Stanworth SJ, De La Salle B, Wood EM, Pasricha SR. Serum ferritin as an indicator of iron status: what do we need to know? Am J Clin Nutr. 2017;106(Suppl 6):1634S-1639S.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang R, Manson JE, Meigs JB, Ma J, Rifai N, Hu FB. Body iron stores in relation to risk of type 2 diabetes in apparently healthy women. JAMA. 2004;291(6):711–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saito H, Tomita A, Ohashi H, Maeda H, Hayashi H, Naoe T. Determination of ferritin and hemosiderin iron in patients with normal iron stores and iron overload by serum ferritin kinetics. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2012;74(1–2):39–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rachner TD, Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. Osteoporosis: now and the future. Lancet. 2011;377(9773):1276–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan Y, Xu F, Cao Y, Xu L, Yu C, Yang F, et al. Iron accumulation leads to bone loss by inducing mesenchymal stem cell apoptosis through the activation of caspase3. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;187(2):434–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. He YF, Ma Y, Gao C, Zhao GY, Zhang LL, Li GF, et al. Iron overload inhibits osteoblast biological activity through oxidative stress. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2013;152(2):292–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang X, Chen B, Sun J, Jiang Y, Zhang H, Zhang P, et al. Iron-induced oxidative stress stimulates osteoclast differentiation via NF-κB signaling pathway in mouse model. Metabolism. 2018;83:167–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xie W, Lorenz S, Dolder S, Hofstetter W. Extracellular iron is a modulator of the differentiation of osteoclast lineage cells. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016;98(3):275–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Xiao W, Beibei F, Guangsi S, Yu J, Wen Z, Xi H, et al. Iron overload increases osteoclastogenesis and aggravates the effects of ovariectomy on bone mass. J Endocrinol. 2015;226(3):121–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinigaglia L, Fargion S, Fracanzani AL, Binelli L, Battafarano N, Varenna M, et al. Bone and joint involvement in genetic hemochromatosis: role of cirrhosis and iron overload. J Rheumatol. 1997;24(9):1809–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dede AD, Trovas G, Chronopoulos E, Triantafyllopoulos IK, Dontas I, Papaioannou N, et al. Thalassemia-associated osteoporosis: a systematic review on treatment and brief overview of the disease. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(12):3409–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Babaei M, Bijani A, Heidari P, Hosseini SR, Heidari B. Serum ferritin levels and bone mineral density in the elderly. Caspian J Intern Med. 2018;9(3):232–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Runolfsdottir HL, Sigurdsson G, Franzson L, Indridason OS. Gender comparison of factors associated with age-related differences in bone mineral density. Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Recker R, Lappe J, Davies K, Heaney R. Characterization of perimenopausal bone loss: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15(10):1965–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sirola J, Kröger H, Honkanen R, Jurvelin JS, Sandini L, Tuppurainen MT, et al. Factors affecting bone loss around menopause in women without HRT: a prospective study. Maturitas. 2003;45(3):159–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Qian Y, Yin C, Chen Y, Zhang S, Jiang L, Wang F, et al. Estrogen contributes to regulating iron metabolism through governing ferroportin signaling via an estrogen response element. Cell Signal. 2015;27(5):934–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Weitzmann MN, Pacifici R. Estrogen deficiency and bone loss: an inflammatory tale. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(5):1186–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the time and effort given by participants during the data collection phase of the NHANES project.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants from the project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81873327, 82004392 and 81573996), the Double First-class Discipline Construction Project of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Grant No. Z2015002), the major project of “Double First-class” and High-level University Discipline Collaborative Innovation Team of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Grant No. 2021XK05), the cultivated project of “Double First-class” and High-level University Discipline Collaborative Innovation Team of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Grant No. 2021XK41 and 2021XK46), and the Foundation of Guangdong Educational Committee for Youth Scientists (Grant No. 2019KQNCX017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

    Peng Peng, Fangjun Xiao, Shihua Gao, Weihua Fang & Tianye Lin

  2. Guangdong Research Institute for Orthopedics and Traumatology of Chinese Medicine, NO.261, Longxi Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510378, People’s Republic of China

    Wei He & Qiushi Wei

  3. Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

    Wei He & Qiushi Wei

Authors
  1. Peng Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fangjun Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shihua Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weihua Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tianye Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qiushi Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PP, FJX, SHG, WHF, and TYL contributed to data collection, analysis, and writing of the manuscript. WH and QSW contributed to study design and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiushi Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics review board of the National Center for Health Statistics approved all NHANES protocols, and written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, P., Xiao, F., Gao, S. et al. Association between serum ferritin and bone mineral density in US adults. J Orthop Surg Res 17, 494 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03357-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03357-1

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X