Skip to main content

Systematic review of intervertebral disc repair: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles


Study design

A bibliometric review of the literature.


To identify the most frequently cited articles relating to the repair of intervertebral disc (IVD) and to summarize the key points and findings of these highly cited works, to quantify their impact on the developments of the disc disease treatment.

Summary of background data

IVD repair is an ever-growing and multi-disciplinary innovating treatment method for disc diseases. There are numerous literatures and related studies about it, promoting the development of the field. A comprehensive review and analysis of the most influential articles can help clarify the most effective strategy of IVD repair, and discover the promising directions for future research.


The Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge was searched for citations of all literatures relevant to IVD repair. The number of citations, key points, categories, authorships, years, journals, countries, and institutions of publications were analyzed.


The most highly cited articles in IVD Repair were published over 30 years, between 1991 and 2017. Most works (No. 41) were published between 2005 and 2009. The most-cited article was Sakai’s 2003 article which described the possibility of combining MSC and gel to repair IVD. The three most popular categories involved were Orthopedics [44], Clinical Neurology [34], Engineering, and Biomedical [24]. The three most common topics were regenerative medicine and the progenitor cells [33], biomaterials and cellular scaffolds [29], application of growth factors [25]. Author Masuda and the partners have 4 articles in the top 100 list. The Rush University has 12 articles in the top 100 list.


This report identifies the top 100 articles in IVD repair and acknowledges those individuals who have contributed the most to the study of the IVD repair and the body of knowledge used to the repair strategy making. It allows insight into the trends of this innovative and interdisciplinary subspecialty of spine surgery.


The pain and dysfunction of lumber and lower extremities caused by degenerative disc disease (DDD) are the focus of spinal surgery [1]. However, when conservative treatment fails, aggressive treatment is surgical intervention, such as discectomy, disc replacement and spinal fusion, These treatments can only temporarily relieve pain, cannot restore the normal structure and biomechanical function of the IVD, resulting in the loss of normal function of the corresponding segment, and with a higher postoperative recurrence rate. Driven by biomaterials and tissue engineering, it is possible to construct intervertebral discs in vitro and repair in vivo. The WHO has nominated the development of mesenchymal stem cells and cell scaffold to promote IVD repair as primary research objectives [2]. Recent years, basic sciences and clinical research remain paramount in the understanding and advancement of IVD repair, in which many related literatures have been reported. The disciplines involved, research directions, objectives and main ideas, methods about these studies are different from each other. It is difficult to determine the best engineering strategy that may advance IVD repair. For innovative topics, it is particularly important to find research trends and directions during the important articles.

Bibliometric analysis is a method used to study published articles citation history, which can be used to overcome the evaluation mentioned above [3]. The number of citations received by an article can be used to quantify the influence the work has had in a particular area of investigation [4]. The most highly cited publications represent the highest impact work in a given field and serve as the basic of a new category [5]. The research directions of these articles can show the trends in this research area [6]. The greater the number of citations an author has, the more influence they have in their particular area of expertise [7]. As the impact factor (IF) is considered to be a measure of journal quality and rank, the IF of the journal can be analyzed by citation analysis to evaluate the importance of the journal [8].

In spinal surgery, recent publications identified the top 100 articles about spinal deformity surgery [9], imaging of the spine [10], cervical spine surgery [11], lumbar spine surgery [12], and in spinal journals etc. The goal of this article is to identify the most-cited literatures about IVD repair and to analyze the top 100 of them. They were analyzed around the following parameters: frequency of citation, categories, chronological, geographical, institutional, and journals, as well as the keywords and subject terms involved and their frequency of occurrence. In order to discover the authoritative trends and directions in the research of IVD repair.

Materials and methods

The Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge, a search platform that provides bibliographic database services, was used to search for citations of all articles from 1980 to 2019 relevant to the IVD repair. The decision on which journals to search was made with the use of Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report database, which ranks journals according to impact factor.

The search limits and sorting options in the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge were used to rank all articles from each journal according to the number of citations. The results were then carefully reviewed and only those relevant to IVD repair were selected. The 100 articles that matched the search criteria were then further analyzed. Specifically, the title, first author, journal, year of publication, number of citations, origin nations and institutions were recorded.


A total of 1183 articles matched the search criteria. Of those, 50 were cited more than 100 times. Table 1 demonstrates the top 100 most-cited articles regarding IVD repair. The articles are published between 2000 and 2017 except one is published at 1991, which was written by Thompson and was cited 316 times. The mean number of citations of the selected 100 articles was 112.32. The most highly cited article was “Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells embedded in Atelocollagen((R)) gel to the intervertebral disc: a potential therapeutic model for disc” published in the Biomaterials by Sakai et al, with 332 citations on Web Of Science (WOS).Between 2005 and 2009, producing the largest number of highly cited articles published (41%) (Fig. 1). The top 100 articles were published in 48 journals, with the top 3 journals publishing 44% of the articles (Table 2). The top journal was Spine, with 23 articles, followed by the Biomaterials, with 9 articles, and the European Spine Journal, with 9 articles. The 3 most popular categories published were Orthopedics (No. is 44), Clinical Neurology (No. is 34), Engineering, Biomedical (No. is 24) (Table 3). A total of 81 first authors contributed to the top 100 articles. Only 2 were credited with 3 or more publications and only 1, Masuda, had 4 publications in the top 100 (Table 4). The top articles originated from 18 different countries, with the USA (44%) being the most prolific (Fig. 2). There were 59 institutions responsible for the top-cited articles with Rush University in Chicago, the USA, contributed 12 publications of the top 100 (Table 5).

Table 1 The top 100 papers in IVD repair
Fig. 1

The 100 most-cited articles related to IVD repair distributed over 5-year intervals according to date of publication

Table 2 Top journals of publication
Table 3 Most popular categories ranked by numbers of articles
Table 4 Top authors of publication
Fig. 2

The nations of origin (according to address provided by the first author) for the 100 most-cited articles

Table 5 Top institutions of origin of articles


Bibliometrics is a form of statistical analysis used to quantify the frequency of citations within published academic literature [13]. Although not the sole marker of an articles scientific quality, the number of citations amassed by a paper can be used as a surrogate marker of the impact made within its field.

This article identifies the authors and topics that have made the most impact on the practice of IVD repair over the course of the past 30 years. By identifying these classic works, insight is gained into the history, development, and current trends in IVD repair. The findings of this study identified the articles responsible for the most important developments in this field. Through bibliometrics, we screened the most-cited articles, and we were able to observe that these articles are most often centered around topics that are closely related to tissue engineering regenerative medicine, firstly, the induction of differentiation of stem cells that can achieve maximum restoration of the in vivo structure, so the application of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells became the most involved topic. Secondly, since the intervertebral disc provides certain biomechanical functions and is a passive load-bearing structure that requires a certain modulus of elasticity and rigidity in different postures, material engineering is particularly important. By controlling the parameters of polymeric synthetic materials, it is possible to find natural or synthetic materials with similar mechanical parameters that will help to meet the required mechanical properties of the disc while stem cells are transplanted. Growth factors play a non-negligible role in the regulation and induction of the regeneration process, and through the study of growth factors, it is possible to regulate the proliferation and differentiation of stem cells according to the desired parameters. Therefore, articles dealing with these topics are the most cited and the hotspot for research on regenerative repair of intervertebral discs.

The most-cited article in IVD repair is the work in 2003 by Sakai and Mochida [14]; this study showed the hypothesize that the maintenance of proteoglycan content in the disc could be achieved by avoiding the depletion of nucleus pulposus and preserving the structure of the annulus, which is a primary factor of decelerating the disc degeneration, and the stem cell level was the best consideration to solve this problem. They took the rabbits with induced discs degeneration as animal model, which autologous MSCs (mesenchymal stem cells) embedded in Atelocollagen((R)) gel were transplanted into the discs. The results demonstrated that the MSCs transplantation is effective in decelerating disc degeneration. The Atelocollagen((R)) gel served as an important carrier of MSCs in transplantation, permitting proliferation, matrix synthesis and differentiation of MSCs. This idea of combining stem cells with cellular scaffold as a strategy for disc repair is widely used and has been shown to be effective. Proteoglycan expression has also become one of the valid indicators for the success of the repair because of the important role it plays in the structure and function of nucleus pulposus and annulus [15].

The second most-cited article is also the oldest in the top 100 list, which is from 1991 by Thompson [16]; this paper describe the stimulation of intervertebral disc by growth factors on mature canine. The study divided the discs into three regions: annular, transitional, and nuclear, and devise a tissue culture system for them. The culture system was perturbed by plasma-derived equine serum, fetal calf serum, insulin-like growth factor-1, epidermal growth factor fibroblast growth factor, and transforming growth factor-beta. They finally found the transforming growth factor-β and epidermal growth factor elicited the greater proliferative response than fibroblast growth factor, more than that, the nucleus and transition zone responded more than anulus to the growth factors. This classic work laid the foundation for growth factors and cell biology in disc repair. More profound and direct evidence of the prominent role of transforming factor-β in stimulating the proliferation and differentiation of disc cells has been provided in numerous studies since then and inspired us to consider adding and loading growth factors to play an important assist role while performing stem cell scaffold to repair discs.

The third most-cited article was the 2006 work of Sakai and Mochida [17]. They transplanted the LacZ expressing MSCs to rabbit IVDs 2 weeks after induction of degeneration. Unlike the study reported in 2003, this experiment set up two control groups, including normal controls (NC) without operations and sham operated with only disc degeneration being induced. Then, the disc height by plain radiograph, T2-weighted signal intensity in MRI, histology, immunohistochemistry and matrix-associated gene expressions were evaluated between them. The results confirmed that the MSC group showed an absolute advantage over the other two groups in terms of preservation of disc structure and accumulation of proteoglycans. Therefore, demonstrated MSCs could serve as a valuable resource in cell transplantation therapy for IVD disease. MSC research in tissue engineering for disc repair is a landmark development in this topic, which has led to the involvement of regenerative medicine in the repair of discs where the shortcomings of conventional sutures and simple resection are compensated by the biological effects of MSC. IN the 100 most-cited articles, 21 were related to MSC. Through observation, there have also been many articles attempting to repair discs through other types of progenitor cells, such as autologous cultured disc-derived chondrocytes (ADCT).

Regenerative medicine and the application of stem cells was the most popular topic in the top 100 articles with a total of 34 works dedicated to it. In the past exploration of stem cell regeneration for the treatment of disc defects, stem cell attempts began with ADCT, some studies have shown it contribute to the repair of discs, but there are significant limitations in its application, due to the utility of such cells was limited by the difficulties with graft procurement, harvest site morbidity, and functionality [18]. There are 7 articles on ADCT. The most important article was the study by Ganey in 2003, demonstrated that the autologous chondrocyte transplantation is technically feasible and biologically relevant to repairing disc damage and retarding disc degeneration. Afterwards, the focus of progenitor cell selection shifts to the application of MSC (mesenchymal stem cells). The number of articles on MSC applications was largest, nearly 22 papers. MSCs contain stem cells and possess the ability to regenerate bone, cartilage, and fibrous tissues. The studies were broadly divided into vitro culture tests and in vivo degenerative model intervention tests. MSCs were loaded into the disc environment in a variety of ways, including direct injection, loading via cellular scaffolds, etc. After a few weeks, the height of the intervertebral gap was assessed by X-ray, disc water content was assessed by T2-weighted term of MRI, the proteoglycan and collagen content was assessed by proteomics. The majority of trials have confirmed that MSC has excellent results in repairing intervertebral disc defects, restoring disc structure and function, and potentially delaying disc degeneration [14]. The most influential between the 22 articles, already mentioned above, was written by Sakai and Mochida. The strategy was MSCs and Atelocollagen((R)) gel to decelerate the disc degeneration. In addition to this, there are many studies exploring the application of other progenitor cells in intervertebral disc repair, with 3 out of 100 articles studied the adipose tissue-derived stem cells. The repair of a damaged disc is possible using autologous adipose tissue derived stem and regenerative cells (ADRCs), and three out of 100 articles addressed the application of notochordal cell (NC) has also been found contributes to the phenotypic differentiation of MSC towards nucleus pulposus (NP) [19].

The second most popular topic out of the 100 articles was Biomaterials and Cellular Scaffolds, which conducted by 31 articles. Biomolecular materials can be used to repair defects in the fibrous ring and medullary nucleus, restore the biomechanical structure and function of the intervertebral disc, and serve as a carrier for loading delivery cells in the cell therapy process, enhancing the effect of progenitor cells regeneration therapy and drug-assisted therapy such as growth factors. Among the 100 articles analyzed, the most used material is hydrogel, which is used by 11 articles. This exhibits the following properties: (1) it is highly plastic and can be used to repair irregular disc defects; (2) it can be synthesized to include sensitive components such as photosensitive components and temperature-sensitive components; and would undergo structural changes through environmental changes, which can help ensure the biomechanical support of the defect site after repair while filling and repairing; these properties make hydrogel one of the most common choices of cellular scaffold materials. Hydrogel plays a different role in the repair of different parts of the intervertebral disc. It has been demonstrated that hydrogels are superior in restoring the structure of the nucleus. In contrast, the role of hydrogels in annulus fibrous repair is still being explored due to the special laminar structure and the higher intensity biomechanical requirements of it. The most-cited article for hydrogel applications was published by Richardson in 2008, which described the trend of human MSC differentiation towards NP cells on chitosan-glycerophosphate hydrogels. In annulus fibrous repair, many attempts have been made in previous studies, such as silk [20], ABS and PLA Scaffold [21], and a cell scaffold made by chitosan salts cross-linked to Genipin [22].

The third most common topic published in the top 100 IVD repair articles was application of growth factors in IVD regenerative therapy. There are 26 articles related to it. The most-cited article is still the classic 1991 article by Thompson, already mentioned above. A significant role of TGF-β in disc regeneration was confirmed in subsequent explorations. In addition, studies have focused on the role of factors such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1), and bone morphogenetic protein-7 (BMP-7).

The most recent article, published in 2017, was written by Dowdell [23]; it is a review about intervertebral disk degeneration and repair, which described the biological therapies as a promising treatment modality for DDD that could impact our future management of low back pain. The 100th article on the list written by Coric et al. [24] is a 12-month prospective cohort of the clinical and radiographic results from a study of cell-based therapy in the treatment of lumbar spondylosis with mechanical LBP.

Among the top-cited articles, 41 papers are published between 2005 and 2009. Unlike the bibliometric analysis of other topics, the most-cited articles are not focused on the early part of the chronological range of distribution, as regeneration and tissue repair of the disc are emerging research directions. It is reasonable to speculate that the reason for the sudden burst of high-quality research in IVD repair between the specific time interval is closely related to the breakthrough in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering research. At the same time, we are forced to consider a phenomenon in the bibliometric analysis, called “obliteration by incorporation,” which suggests that many classic articles will be cited by later HF-cited articles, which may be one reason why the chronological distribution of HF-cited articles presents the current results.

The journal with the most published articles is SPINE, and although disc repair involves multiple subject areas, it can be found that research dedicated to this direction still revolves around the treatment of spinal disorders, indicating a vision in disc repair to help provide solutions for more patients with low back pain.

To the current authors’ knowledge, this article is the first to identify the 100 articles in IVD repair. This study provides unique insight into the development and trends of this challenging subspecialty within Spine Surgery and Regenerative Medicine in the twentieth and early twenty first centuries. The work identifies topics that were involved most into the ever-growing body of knowledge. Furthermore, we can preliminarily identify research trends in the field of IVD repair at the disciplinary level, and preliminarily identify preferred strategies for IVD repair based on up to three topics involved, as a way of collaborative research in multiple disciplinary areas such as progenitor cell tissue engineering, biomaterials and cellular molecular therapy. The field of stem cells and tissue regeneration is dominated by MSC research, combined with multiple comparative progenitor cell studies. The choice of cellular scaffold material is based on the preparation of hydrogels, and the research of natural materials such as silkworm also foreshadows the current and future research attempts. There is a long history of research on proteins such as growth factors that contribute to IVD repair, and synergistic stem cell therapy will help differentiate the different components of the disc. In addition to this, studies of IVD biomechanics as well as tissue embryology are of particularly importance and will help to select cellular scaffold materials with more complex intervertebral mechanics requirements, and explore the possibility of inducing progenitor cell intervertebral differentiation into annulus fibrous and NP (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3

The top topics for the 100 most-cited articles pertaining to IVD repair

In the process of disc repair, combined with the latest concepts of translational medicine [25], it can be envisaged to work together on a disc repair strategy that meets human needs through interdisciplinary research, and to test the performance of the disc with the help of in vitro tests that simulate the biomechanical environment of the disc in vivo, and to prepare patches according to the operational strategy of clinical disc surgery, analyze the in vivo degradation rate of cellular scaffolds and the differentiation of progenitor cells. The rate of filling and the status of the disc patches were assessed by MRI for follow-up assessment at different postoperative time points. This is fed back to the basic laboratory for parameter adjustment by mechanics, regeneration, and structural recovery in the respective disciplinary laboratories. With regard to possible complications in the post-repair period, timely remediation or revision surgery is performed according to the translational medicine strategy, and it is believed that the regenerative disc repair strategy will be applied earlier in the clinical setting through the translational medicine pathway.


To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to identify the top 100 classic articles in IVD repair. This study provides a unique insight into the developments and trends in this challenging new spine surgery subspecialty in the early twentieth and twenty first centuries. This work identifies those individuals, institutions, and countries that have contributed most to the growing body of knowledge, and these past study ideas and disc repair strategies suggest that tissue engineering repair of intervertebral disc is an interdisciplinary research topic involving orthopedics, tissue engineering, biomaterials, such as biochemistry and molecular biology, as well as guiding the future direction of disc repair research. In addition, the 100 articles identified in this study are the most-cited articles, the most influential in the field, and the most memorable. It is reasonable to believe that the regenerative repair of the intervertebral disc will be achieved through the efforts of regenerative medicine, discovering the most appropriate progenitor cells for induction, simulating the microenvironment for the regeneration of intervertebral disc cells with growth factors, combining mechanical simulation with material engineering, preparing cellular scaffolds conforming to the mechanical properties of the fibrous ring and nucleus pulposus using materials such as silk proteins and hydrogels, and exploring in depth the induced changes in physical traits.

Availability of data and materials

The data collected and analyzed in the article are from WOS, an open access database of scholarly articles, and are properly adopted and collected.



Intervertebral disc


Degenerative disc disease


Web of Science


Nucleus pulposus


Low back pain


High frequency


Mesenchymal stem cells


Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymer


Polylactic acid


Notochordal cell




Osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1)


Bone morphogenetic protein-7


Autologous adipose tissue-derived stem and regenerative cells


Autologous cultured disc-derived chondrocytes


Impact factor


Transforming growth factor-β


World Health Organization


  1. 1.

    Diebo BG, et al. Adult spinal deformity. Lancet. 2019;394:160–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Melrose J. Strategies in regenerative medicine for intervertebral disc repair using mesenchymal stem cells and bioscaffolds. Regen Med. 2016;11(7):705–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kelly JC, et al. The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume. 2010;92(10):1338–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ellegaard O, Wallin JA. The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics. 2015;105(3):1809–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Roldan-Valadez E, et al. Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics. Irish journal of medical science. 2019;188(3):939–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cooper ID. Bibliometrics basics. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. 2015;103(4):217–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Garfield, E., Journal impact factor: a brief review. CMAJ, 1999. 161(8): p. 979-980.

  9. 9.

    Skovrlj B, et al. The 100 Classic Papers in Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine deformity. 2014;2(4):241–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Das JP, Aherne E, Kavanagh E. Imaging of the spine: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles. Spine. 2019;44(22):1593–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Skovrlj B, et al. The 100 Most Influential Articles in Cervical Spine Surgery. Global spine journal. 2016;6(1):69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Steinberger J, et al. The top 100 classic papers in lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2015;40(10):740–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987;257(1):52–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sakai D, et al. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells embedded in Atelocollagen((R)) gel to the intervertebral disc: a potential therapeutic model for disc degeneration. Biomaterials. 2003;24(20):3531–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Roughley PJ, Alini M, Antoniou J. The role of proteoglycans in aging, degeneration and repair of the intervertebral disc. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2002;30:869–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Thompson JP, Oegema TR Jr, Bradford DS. Stimulation of mature canine intervertebral disc by growth factors. Spine. 1991;16(3):253–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sakai D, et al. Regenerative effects of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells embedded in atelocollagen to the degenerated intervertebral disc. Biomaterials. 2006;27(3):335–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Acosta FL Jr, et al. Porcine Intervertebral Disc Repair Using Allogeneic Juvenile Articular Chondrocytes or Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Tissue Engineering Part A. 2011;17(23-24):3045–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Korecki CL, et al. Notochordal cell conditioned medium stimulates mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward a young nucleus pulposus phenotype. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2010;1.

  20. 20.

    Chang G, et al. Porous silk scaffolds can be used for tissue engineering annulus fibrosus. European Spine Journal. 2007;16(11):1848–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rosenzweig DH, et al. 3D-Printed ABS and PLA Scaffolds for Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus Tissue Regeneration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015;16(7):15118–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mwale F, et al. Biological evaluation of chitosan salts cross-linked to genipin as a cell scaffold for disk tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering. 2005;11(1-2):130–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dowdell J, et al. Intervertebral Disk Degeneration and Repair. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(3):S46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Coric D, et al. Prospective study of disc repair with allogeneic chondrocytes Presented at the 2012 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery-Spine. 2013;18(1):85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mediouni M , Schlatterer D R , Madry H , et al. A review of translational medicine. The future paradigm: how can we connect the orthopedic dots better? Current Medical Research & Opinion, 2017, 34(7):1.

Download references


Prof. Meng assisted in editing and revising the article. Prof. Guan and Prof. Hai provide directional advice. Mr. Xing and Mr. Feng assisted with data collection and statistical analysis.


We have not received payment or support in kind for any aspect of the submitted work (including but not limited to grants, consulting fee or honorarium, support for travel to meetings for the study or other purposes, fees for participation in review activities such as data monitoring boards, statistical analysis, end point committees, and the like, payment for writing or reviewing the manuscript, provision of writing assistance, medicines, equipment, or administrative support) at any time.

Author information




This article is co-authored by the authors mentioned. The main work was done by the first author, Gang Xu, and was directed and revised by the corresponding author, Xianglong Meng, with additional work done by the remaining authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianglong Meng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not involve animal or human testing, the use of devices, drugs, novel biomaterials or any experimental interventions, and is based on the analysis and discussion of previous relevant literature, relevant data and citations are cited from public open databases. The literature search and data collection were performed by two authors, with one author performing the search and data collection and the other author performing the quality control, making the evidence reliable.

Consent for publication

The author grants permission for publication of this article to any journal or organization wishing to receive the article.

Competing interests

We warrant that our submission to the work is original, does not infringe upon, violate, or misappropriate any copyright or other intellectual property rights, or any other proprietary right, contract or other right or interest of any third party, and that he or she has full power to enter into this agreement. Neither this work nor a similar work has been published nor shall be submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration by this publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, G., Meng, X., Guan, J. et al. Systematic review of intervertebral disc repair: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited articles. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 207 (2021).

Download citation