Skip to main content

Wrist function recovery course in patients with scaphoid nonunion treated with combined volar bone grafting and a dorsal antegrade headless screw

Abstract

Background

Surgical treatment is necessary for scaphoid nonunion. Open surgery with a combined volar and dorsal approach is thought to have poor functional outcomes and a prolonged recovery course. However, the detailed recovery course for this approach is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the recovery course and radiographic outcome for patients with scaphoid nonunion who underwent a combined volar bone grafting and dorsal antegrade headless screw approach.

Material and methods

Eighteen patients with scaphoid nonunion who underwent combined volar bone grafting and dorsal antegrade headless screw fixation were enrolled in this retrospective study. Preoperative and serial postoperative wrist functional and radiographic outcomes were collected and analysed.

Results

All 18 patients achieved bone union at a mean time of 14.3 weeks. Compared to the preoperative status, the grip strength, wrist motion arc, and Mayo Wrist score were improved significantly 6 months after surgery, whilst the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score did not recover until 12 months after surgery. Significant improvements were found in all scaphoid radiographic parameters.

Conclusion

The surgical outcomes for scaphoid nonunion treated with a combined volar bone grafting and dorsal antegrade headless screw achieved a high union rate, with great wrist functional and radiographic outcomes. The earliest recovered wrist functional parameters were grip strength, motion arc, Mayo Wrist score and finally the DASH score at postoperative 6 months and 12 months, respectively.

Introduction

Scaphoid fracture accounts for 60% of all carpal fractures, and be the second most fractures around the wrists [1]. The highest nonunion rate was 15.5% of scaphoid fracture amongst whole body bones [2]. Untreated scaphoid nonunion may progress to scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) deformity, and generalised wrist arthritis. Surgical procedures including bone graft and screw fixation are the gold standard treatments for scaphoid nonunion [3, 4]. In comparison to percutaneous screw fixation and arthroscopic bone grafting, a combined volar and dorsal approach for bone grafting and screw fixation is thought to have inferior functional outcomes and prolonged recovery course because of the risks of a disrupted blood supply and scar formation [5]. However, the detailed recovery course and the functional and radiographic outcomes of this approach are rarely reported in the literature. A better understanding of the recovery course of combined volar and dorsal approaches may fill the gap between clinical science and clinical practice [6,7,8]. The aim of this study was to investigate the recovery course and the functional and radiographic outcomes of patients with scaphoid nonunion who were treated with combined volar bone grafting and dorsal antegrade headless screw fixation.

Material and methods

Study population

The trial was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan (Protocol ID: CMUH109-REC1-093), and was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Clinical data of 18 patients with scaphoid nonunion who underwent volar bone grafting that included a dorsal antegrade headless screw from January 2016 to June 2019 were collected. The inclusion criteria were scaphoid waist fracture with no sign of bone union for more than a 3-month period, and Herbert classification type D1 (nonunion > 6 weeks, fibrous union with no deformity), D2 (nonunion > 6 weeks, pseudarthrosis with early deformity), D3 (non-union > 6 weeks, sclerotic pseudarthrosis with advanced deformity) [9]. The exclusion criteria included radio-scaphoid arthritis, scaphoid nonunion with AVN, and previous scaphoid surgery.

Surgical technique

The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia. The patient was positioned supine with the upper limb placed on a radiolucent table. A tourniquet was placed at the upper arm and inflated to 250 mmHg during surgery. A 4 cm curved incision was made along the radial border of flexor carpi radialis tendon (FCR) proximally from the wrist crest and distally to the scaphoid tubercle. The radial artery and its dorsal branch were carefully protected. The capsulotomy was performed above the radial scaphoid joint with a vertical incision. The nonunion site was then exposed. Interposed fibrous tissue and sclerotic bone that had occupied the nonunion site were removed thoroughly. The tourniquet was released to ensure the bleeding viability of the fracture fragment. Two 1.6-mm Kirschner wires were inserted perpendicularly into the central portion of proximal and distal fragments of the fractured scaphoid. The nonunion gap was opened with the aid of a pin distractor. Mercerized cancellous bone harvested from the iliac crest was impacted into the wedge-shape fracture gap. The scaphoid length, humpback deformity of scaphoid, and the DISI deformity of carpal bone were corrected with this method and verified with intraoperative fluoroscopy. The dorsal approach was then adapted for screw fixation. A 3-cm longitudinal incision was made over the ulnar border of the Lister’s tubercle. The extensor retinaculum was incised along extensor pollicis longus tendon (EPL), and the dorsal radiocarpal joint capsule was exposed between the third and fourth extensor compartment. A vertical capsulotomy was made to expose the scapholunate ligament. Care was taken not to disrupt the blood vessels entering the mid-portion of the scaphoid as well as protection the integrity of scapholunate ligament. The wrist joint was positioned to 30° of flexion and 10° of ulnar deviation to expose the screw entry point. A 1.0-mm antegrade Kirschner wire that served as a guidewire was inserted along the central axis of the scaphoid under intraoperative fluoroscopy. With an appropriate screw length, a 3.0 Dartfire screw (Wright, Memphis, TN, USA) was inserted into the scaphoid along the central axis of the guidewire. The fracture and bone graft stability were verified with fluoroscopy after the headless screw fixation. The wound was then closed in layers with gauze packed well and protection with short arm thumb spica cast immediately after surgery.

Postoperative protocol

A short arm thumb spica cast was applied for 6 weeks and was replaced with a wrist brace for an additional 6 weeks. Clinical and radiographic follow-up were arranged every 4 weeks for the first 3 months. After the short arm thumb spica cast was removed, the patients began to participate in a rehabilitation programme, in which a well-trained physical therapist applied passive motion training. At 12 weeks after surgery, low-impact exercises with muscle strengthening were allowed. The patients were allowed to return to full sports activity 6 months after surgery. Wrist flexion-extension arcs, grip strength, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Mayo Wrist score, and DASH score were recorded at postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively.

Radiographic examination

Our protocol was based on the routine scaphoid series recommended by the American College of Radiology in Shenoy et al. [10]. The scaphoid series was taken in four views: posterior-anterior, lateral, semi-pronated oblique, and posterior-anterior ulna deviation.

The radiographic examination was performed at postoperative 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. The definition of bone union was that the bony trabeculae grew over the junction between the bone graft and the distal and proximal fragments according to the four views of the scaphoid series, and the clinical symptoms of pain and tenderness relieved [11, 12]. Bone union on was routinely performed at 6 months postoperatively to confirm the union status, which was defined as bone bridging over 50% on the nonunion site [13, 14]. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated with the following five parameters: scaphoid axial length [15], scapholunate angle (normal range, 30 to 60°; humpback deformity > 60°) [16], radiolunate angle (normal range, 0 to 10°; DISI deformity > 15°) [17, 18], carpal height ratio (normal range, 0.5; carpal collapse < 0.45) [19], and the lateral intrascaphoid angle (normal range, < 35°; humpback deformity > 35°) [20].

The measurements of these five parameters were performed by two experienced hand surgeons. If there was a discrepancy in the measurement value or bone union time, a revised measurement was determined after re-measurement and discussion by the two surgeons.

Clinical evaluations

Grip strength and flexion-extension arcs were measured by a blinded observer, who was not aware of the surgical plan, and other radiographic findings were measured preoperatively and at postoperative 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, respectively. The hand grip strength was measured with a Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer (Jamar Technologies/America) using the Southampton protocol as follows [12]: patients were seated with back support and the hips flexed as close to 90° as could be tolerated. The patients rested their forearms on the arms of the bed with their wrists in a neutral position. The measurer supported the weight of the device by resting it on his or her palm. Measurements were performed three times for each hand to give six readings in total. The best of the six grip strength measurements was used in the statistical analyses. The operated hand was measured as a percentage of the normal side. Considering whether the dominant or non-dominant hand was injured, we employed the 10% rule for data correction [13,14,15]. The active wrist flexion-extension arcs for the operated and non-operated hands were measured with the manual universal goniometer.

The functional outcomes of the 18 patients were evaluated with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), DASH score and Mayo Wrist score questionnaires preoperatively and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postoperatively. The patient’s satisfaction was classified into four degrees according to the Mayo Wrist score: excellent, 90 to 100; good, 80 to 90; satisfactory, 60 to 80; and poor, below 60.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed using the SPSS software (Version 20.0; Chicago, Illinois). Univariate analysis was performed using frequencies for descriptive statistics. Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the analysis of the categorical variable. Post hoc analysis, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test performed to evaluate the significant differences between preoperative and postoperative measures at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Correlations were considered significant if p values were less than 0.05 (two-sided).

Results

From January 2016 to June 2019, 25 patients received surgical treatment for scaphoid nonunion in our hospital. Three were excluded because of avascular necrosis, three due to loss of follow-up, and one for previous scaphoid surgery. Eighteen patients were finally included for analysis (Table 1). All patients received volar bone grafting and a dorsal antegrade headless screw. The patients’ average age was 32.7 (range, 20 to 59) years. Initial injury to operation time was 20.8 (range, 3 to 144) months. Mean time to union was 14.3 (range, 8.9 to 20.9) weeks. Thirteen (72%) patients were men and 5 (28%) were women. Four patients were smokers (22%). The injury mechanism included ten traffic accidents (56%), and eight falls (44%). Scaphoid nonunion on the right side occurred for 9 (50%) and on the left side for 9 (50%), and the dominant hand of all patients was the right side (100%). The fracture site for all patients was at the scaphoid mid-portion. According to the Herbert classification, two cases were D1 (22%), five cases were D2 (28%), and nine were D3 (50%).

Table 1 Characteristics of the patients

The recovery course for the grip strength, arc of motion, DASH score and Mayo Wrist score from the preoperative period to 12 months postoperative is shown in Table 2. The wrist function recovery course after the operation was divided into three phases (Fig. 1). A downswing phase was noted from the preoperative period to 3 months postoperatively. The lowest wrist function status was found at postoperative 3 months. The upswing phase started from 3 to 6 months postoperatively. A prominent wrist function improvement occurred in which low-impact exercises and light activity were allowed under the assistance of an experienced therapist. The improvement of wrist function was reduced during the steady growth phase (6 to 12 months postoperatively).

Table 2 Recovery course of functional scores in pre-operative and different post-operative, and radiographic parameters of scaphoid deformity
Fig. 1
figure1

Functional recovery course

At postoperative 6 months, the grip strength, Mayo Wrist score (Fig. 2) and motion arcs began to improve significantly compared to preoperative status (Table 2). Finally, the DASH score was significantly improved at postoperative 12 months (P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Mayo Wrist score

The preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters are shown in Table 2. Significant postoperative improvements (P < 0.001) were found in the radiolunate angle (25.8 to 11.3°), scaphoid axial length (24.8 to 27.2 mm), scapholunate angle (61.6 to 51.3°), lateral intrascaphoid angle (43.7 to 30°), and carpal height ratio: (0.46 to 0.52) compared to the preoperative data.

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to investigate the recovery course, and the functional and radiographic outcomes of patients with scaphoid nonunion who were treated with combined volar bone grafting and dorsal antegrade headless screw fixation. The main findings of our study are as follows: (1) The surgical outcomes for scaphoid non-union treated with combined volar bone grafting and a dorsal antegrade headless screw achieved a high union rate, satisfactory wrist functional and radiographic outcomes. (2) The wrist functional recovery course after the double approach surgery for scaphoid nonunion was divided in three phases: a downswing phase from operation to postoperative 3 months, an upswing phase from postoperative 3 to 6 months, and a slower progressing phase from 6 to 12 months postoperatively. (3) Compared to the preoperative status, the grip strength, Mayo Wrist score and motion arcs were the earliest recovered wrist function parameters that had significant improvements at 6 months postoperatively, and finally the DASH score at 12 months postoperatively.

Arthroscopic surgery has the advantages of direct visualisation, facilitated debridement of the scaphoid nonunion site, and minimal violation of the scaphoid vascularity [17]. High union rates of approximately 84 to 100% are reported with this method [5, 21,22,23]. Though this minimally invasive technique has yielded good results with minimal morbidity, its use is still limited to scaphoid nonunion without a large bone defect [24]. In addition to large bone defect filling, the open volar approach is also advantageous in correction to the humpback deformity, scaphoid length and DISI [12, 25] (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of clinical outcomes and functional score of scaphoid nonunion treated with arthroscopic surgery and open surgery

A literature review regarding the wrist functional recovery course after scaphoid nonunion surgery is presented in Table 4 [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. The union rates ranged from 84.6 to 97.1% for open surgeries and 86 to 100% for arthroscopic surgeries. Our patients achieved a 100% union rate, which was higher than that for the open surgery group in previous studies. The high union rate in our study suggested the importance of deformity correction and fixation stability, which were determined by the bone graft quality and the screw position. In addition to the compacted-wedge shape bone graft, the centrally placed screw is the keystone of this procedure. Biomechanically, centrally placed screws have superior stiffness, support a greater load at failure, have a longer screw length and shorter healing time than eccentrically placed screws [36,37,38]. A centrally placed screw from the volar side can also be achieved by a lever trapezium approach or by drilling a portion of it; however, many surgeons prefer the dorsal approach because of the ease of access and the ability to place a screw closer to the central axis [39, 40]. In addition, a study that has examined scaphoid intraosseous vascular anatomy also shows that the central axis and antegrade dorsal screw fixation cause less disruption of the scaphoid internal blood supply than that for the retrograde volar screw [41]. In our study, the headless screws were inserted through the dorsal mini-open approach instead of a purely dorsal percutaneous technique. A mini-open dorsal approach has been shown to be safer than the purely percutaneous method when approaching from the dorsal mid-portion. Weinberg et al. have shown that there is a 13% chance of tendon injury with a purely percutaneous technique [42]. We believe that the mini-open wound to the dorsal mid-portion provides adequate exposure for vessels, ligament protection, and provides an excellent screw insertion site to allow easy insertion of the central axis screw.

Table 4 Comparison of carpal alignment correction in arthroscopic and open bone grafting in the literature

Table 4 shows the final postoperative motion arcs, grip strength and function scores of previous studies. The follow-up time ranged from 8.6 to 37.5 months postoperatively. Most studies had good to excellent results at the final follow-up. However, the detailed recovery course in the first postoperative year was not reported. In our study, we found that the earliest recovered parameters were the grip strength, the Mayo Wrist score and motion arcs, which had recovered significantly at 6 months postoperatively, and finally the DASH score at 12 months. In our protocol, wrist immobilisation with a short arm thumb spica cast and wrist brace was applied for the first three postoperative months. After three postoperative months, low-impact exercises and light activity were allowed under the assistance of an experienced therapist. An average bone union time of 14.3 weeks was observed in this period. In our observation of the functional recovery course of the wrist, the grip strength recovered quickly after the bone union, which could be the early objective predictor to confirm the bone union. The motion arcs improved quickly after the removal of the wrist brace, which could be a reliable parameter to evaluate the intensity and frequency of rehabilitation. The Mayo Wrist score is a questionnaire that consists of pain, satisfaction, range of motion and grip strength. The objective grip strength and motion arcs improvement that occurred in the early postoperative period yielded the early significant improvements in the Mayo Wrist score. The DASH score contains 38 questions, including different kinds of daily activities, highly strained and technically demanding works, which needs longer time of physiotherapy and mainly depend on patient’s subjective feedback. In our opinion, the DASH score is more suitable to evaluate functional recovery 12 months after scaphoid nonunion surgery.

This study has several limitations. First, our study had no control group; however, our results were comparable to Oh. et al., which had better carpal alignment but similar wrist function to the arthroscopic group, though the clinical results were similar [25]. Second, our study’s 12-month follow-up time was relatively short; late complications such as arthritis and screw migration may not be detected in this limited time. Finally, our study’s case number was relatively small. The findings in our study should be confirmed in a future study with a larger population.

Conclusion

The surgical outcomes for scaphoid nonunion treated with combined volar bone grafting and dorsal antegrade headless screw achieved a high union rate and great wrist functional and radiographic outcomes. The earliest recovered wrist functional parameters were grip strength, Mayo Wrist score and motion arc at postoperative 6 months and finally the DASH score at postoperative 12 months. We believe that our findings are informative for clinical hand surgeons to predict the postoperative functional recovery course. Our findings also provide a reference for common functional scores at different evaluation times; however, these findings should be confirmed in a future study with a larger population and longer follow-up time.

Availability of data and materials

The authors agree for the publication and data usage.

Abbreviations

A:

Arthroscopy cancellous bone graft

O:

Open volar cancellous bone grafting

SAL:

Scaphoid axial length

LISA:

Lateral intrascaphoid angle

SLA:

Scapholunate angle

RLA:

Radiolunate angle

CHR:

Carpal height ratio

Pre:

Preoperative degree

Post:

Postoperative degree

NSD:

No significant difference

ND:

No data

K wire:

Kirschner wire

AVN:

Avascular necrosis

DISI:

Dorsal intercalated segment instability

DASH:

Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score

VAS:

Visual Analogue Scale

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. 1.

    Kahl T, Razny FK, Benter JP, Mutig K, Hegenscheid K, Mutze S, et al. Diagnosis of the scaphoid bone: fractures, nonunion, circulation, perfusion. Orthopade. 2016;45(11):938–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T, Watson JT, Ostrum RF, Prayson MJ, et al. Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(11):e162775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Janowski J, Coady C 3rd. CL. Scaphoid fractures: nonunion and malunion. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2016;41(11):1087–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yeo JH, JY K. Surgical strategy for scaphoid nonunion treatment. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2018;23(4):450–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jegal M, Kim JS, Kim JP. Arthroscopic management of scaphoid nonunions. Hand Surg. 2015;20(2):215–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mediouni M, R Schlatterer D, Madry H, MBR C. A review of translational medicine. The future paradigm: how can we connect the orthopedic dots better? Curr Med Res Opin. 2018;34(7):1217–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mediouni M, Madiouni R, Gardner M. N V. Translational medicine: challenges and new orthopaedic vision (Mediouni-Model). Curr Orthop Pract. 2020;31(2):196–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Mediouni M. A new generation of orthopaedic surgeons: “T-model”. Current Orthopaedic Practice. 2019;30(5):444–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Arsalan-Werner A, Sauerbier M, Im M. Current concepts in the treatment of scaphoid fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(1):3–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shenoy R, Pillai A. M H. Scaphoid fractures: variation in radiographic views - a survey of current practice in the west of Scotland region. Eur J Emerg Med. 2007;14(1):2–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jaminet P, Götz M, Gonser P, Schaller HE, Lotter O. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion: radiologic outcome of 286 patients in 10 years. Eplasty. 2019;19:e5.

  12. 12.

    Sayegh ET, RJ S. Graft choice in the management of unstable scaphoid nonunion: a systematic review. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2014;39:1500–6.e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Grewal R, Suh N, JC M. Use of computed tomography to predict union and time to union in acute scaphoid fractures treated nonoperatively. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2013;38(5):872–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Putnam JG, Mitchell SM, DiGiovanni RM, Stockwell EL, SG E. Outcomes of unstable scaphoid nonunion with segmental defect treated with plate fixation and autogenous cancellous graft. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2019;44(2):160.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jain DKA, Shetty N, Naveen Kumar L, DC S. Assessment of usefulness of anthropometric data for predicting the scaphoid and the screw length: a new technique. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2017;22(4):435–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Goldfarb CA, Yin Y. et-al GL. Wrist fractures: what the clinician wants to know. Radiology. 2001;219(1):11–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mathoulin CL. M A. Treatment of the scaphoid humpback deformity – is correction of the dorsal intercalated segment instability deformity critical? J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(1):13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Megerle K, Harenberg PS, Germann G. S H. Scaphoid morphology and clinical outcomes in scaphoid reconstructions. Injury. 2012;43(4):306–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nattrass GR, Gj K, McMurtry RY, Brant RF. An alternative method for determination of the carpal height ratio. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(1):88–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Afshar A, Mohammadi A, Zohrabi K, Navaeifar N, Sami SH. H T. Correlation of reconstructed scaphoid morphology with clinical outcomes. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2015;3(4):244–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wong WY, Ho PC. Minimal invasive management of scaphoid fractures: from fresh to nonunion. Hand Clin. 2011;27(3):291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cognet JM, Louis P, Martinache X, Schernberg F. Arthroscopic grafting of scaphoid nonunion - surgical technique and preliminary findings from 23 cases. Hand Surg Rehab. 2017;36(1):17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wong WC, Ho PC. Arthroscopic management of scaphoid nonunion. Hand Clin. 2019;35(3):295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Oka K, Murase T, Moritomo H, Goto A, Sugamoto K. H Y. Patterns of bone defect in scaphoid nonunion: a 3-dimensional and quantitative analysis. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;30(2):359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Oh WT, Kang HJ, Chun YM, Koh IH, Lee YJ, Choi YR. Retrospective comparative outcomes analysis of arthroscopic versus open bone graft and fixation for unstable scaphoid nonunions. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(10):2810–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kim JP, Seo JB, Yoo JY, JY L. Arthroscopic management of chronic unstable scaphoid nonunions: effects on restoration of carpal alignment and recovery of wrist function. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(3):460–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kang HJ, Chun YM, Koh IH, Park JH, YR C. Is arthroscopic bone graft and fixation for scaphoid nonunions effective? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):204–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Delgado PJ, Jiménez I, Nikolaev M, Figueredo FA, Rozas MG. Arthroscopic reconstruction for unstable scaphoid non-union. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017;61(4):216–23.

  29. 29.

    Lee YK, Choi KW, Woo SH, Ho PC, Lee M. The clinical result of arthroscopic bone grafting and percutaneous K-wires fixation for management of scaphoid nonunions. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(13):e9987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Liu B, Wu F, CY N. Wrist arthroscopy for the treatment of scaphoid delayed or nonunions and judging the need for bone grafting. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2019;44(6):594–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mani KCK. P A. Scaphoid nonunion: does open reduction, bone grafting and Herbert screw fixation justify the treatment? Int Orthop. 2018;42(5):1099–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dustmann M, Bajinski R, Tripp A, Gülke J, Wachter N. A modified Matti-Russe technique of grafting scaphoid non-unions. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137(6):867–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Han SH, Lee HJ, Hong IT, Kim U, SJ L. Non-structural cancellous bone graft and headless compression screw fixation for treatment of scaphoid waist non-union. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(1):89–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kim JK, Yoon JO. H B. Corticocancellous bone graft vs cancellous bone graft for the management of unstable scaphoid nonunion. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(1):115–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kim J, Park JW, Chung J, Jeong Bae K, Gong HS, GH B. Non-vascularized iliac bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2018;43(1):24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Slade JF 3rd, SD D. Minimally invasive management of scaphoid nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:108–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Trumble TE, Clarke T, Kreder HJ. Non-union of the scaphoid. Treatment with cannulated screws compared with treatment with Herbert screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78(12):1829–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    McCallister WV, Knight J, Kaliappan R, Trumble TE. Central placement of the screw in simulated fractures of the scaphoid waist: a biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(1):72–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lucenti L, Lutsky KF, Jones C, Kazarian E, Fletcher D, PK B. Antegrade versus retrograde technique for fixation of scaphoid waist fractures: a comparison of screw placement. J Wrist Surg. 2020;9(1):34–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chan KW, McAdams TR. Central screw placement in percutaneous screw scaphoid fixation: a cadaveric comparison of proximal and distal techniques. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2004;29(1):74–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Morsy M, Sabbagh MD, van Alphen NA, Laungani AT, Kadar A, SL M. The vascular anatomy of the scaphoid: new discoveries using micro-computed tomography imaging. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2019;44(11):928–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Weinberg AM, Pichler W, Grechenig S, Tesch NP, Heidari N, Grechenig W. The percutaneous antegrade scaphoid fracture fixation--a safe method? Injury. 2009;40(6):642–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Chen-Wei Yeh and Cheng-En Hsu designed the concept. Wei-Chih Wang was the attending doctor and treated the patient. Chen-Wei Yeh and Cheng-En Hsu contributed to the literature review and manuscript drafting. Yung-Cheng Chiu revised the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yung-Cheng Chiu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan (Protocol ID: CMUH109-REC1-093), and was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration.

The patient provided consent for the use of his medical documentation and information for the present article.

Consent for publication

The authors agree for the publication and data usage.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeh, CW., Hsu, CE., Wang, WC. et al. Wrist function recovery course in patients with scaphoid nonunion treated with combined volar bone grafting and a dorsal antegrade headless screw. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 519 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02055-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Function recovery
  • Scaphoid nonunion
  • Volar approach
  • Dorsal approach
  • Bone grafting
  • Headless screw