Skip to main content

Melone’s concept revisited in comminuted distal radius fractures: the three-dimensional CT mapping



There is no consensus in the literature about the ideal classification of the distal radius fracture for the clinical practice. The traditional Melone classification system divides the distal radius into four basic components, the shaft, radial styloid, dorsal medial fragment, and volar medial fragment. The aim of this study was to identify fracture lines in comminuted distal radius fractures using three-dimensional mapping of computed tomography (CT) images to test the hypothesis that fracture fragments can be divided according to the Melone classification.


Fifty-nine consecutive OTA/AO 23C3 fractures presented at the hospital between January 2018 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The fracture lines were characterized in the axial, sagittal, and coronal CT planes. After reducing the fractures in a three-dimensional (3D) model, the fracture lines were plotted from the CT images and were then superimposed on one another and oriented to fit a standard template. The area of articular surfaces was measured and compared to quantify the differences between the radial bone fragments.


Thirty-five cases (59.3%) in this study fit the Melone classification and 24 cases (40.7%) did not. On the radiocarpal surface, there was a greater concentration of fracture lines in the dorsal area of the radius than in the volar area. On the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), the fracture lines were focused around two specific concentrated regions. For the articular surface area, the mean area of the radial styloid, volar medial fragment, and dorsal medial fragment was 141.13 ± 90.16 mm2, 147.79 ± 75.94 mm2, and 79.05 ± 70.73 mm2, respectively. There was a significant difference in articular surface area for the Melone fragments (P = 0.002).


The Melone classification system is not suitable for characterizing all C3 fractures. The findings of this study confirm that the dorsal medial fragments are relatively comminuted and small. Extra care should be given to these small fragments when reducing the fracture.


Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common bone fractures in adults [1, 2]. Approximately half of all DRFs occur across the articular surface, and the majority of these are complete articular fractures (Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen classification type C, AO/OTA type C) [3]. Of these intra-articular fractures, a C3 fracture is the most complex, indicating extensive injury to the surfaces of the radiocarpal joint and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) [4]. This complexity is due to the comminution at the articular surfaces and metaphys and due to the vulnerable soft tissue envelope around the wrist. In 1984, Melone et al. developed a classification system for fractures of the distal radius, noting that such fractures are frequently bi-articular injuries and are comprised four basic components: radial shaft, radial styloid, the dorsal medial fragment, and volar medial fragment [5]. However, the Melone classification is based on X-ray data rather than accurate physiological measurements [3]. The other classifications such as Frykman classification and Fernandez classification do not suffice for individual communication-related use in daily practice [6].

Fracture mapping is an imaging method used to examine fracture characteristics and morphology [7]. It allows for the quantitative evaluation of fractures based on CT images and has already been used for investigating scapular fractures, Hoffa fractures and distal radius fractures [7,8,9,10]. The aim of this study is to use fracture mapping on distal radius fractures of AO/OTA type 23C3 and test the null hypothesis that fracture fragments can be divided according to Melone’s classification (shaft, radial styloid, the dorsal medial fragment, and volar medial fragment) [5].Given the limited information available on the anatomical patterns of articular comminution in C3 fractures, this study also aimed to introduce heat mapping of fracture lines to evaluate the morphology of comminuted distal radius fractures.

Materials and methods

Sixty-nine consecutive patients with intra-articular distal radius fractures were enrolled at Pudong New Area Peoples’ Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences between January 2018 and October 2019. The study was approved by the hospital’s human subject research ethics committee, and data collection and analysis were performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects were verbally briefed on the purpose and methods in this study and gave informed consent prior to participation. All patients underwent a CT examination, with the result that 2 patients were excluded due to insufficient quality of images and 8 patients were excluded because they did not have a C3 type fracture. Inclusion criteria were a closed AO/OTA type 23C3 distal radius fracture, age ≥ 18 years, and availability of radiographic and CT images. Patients were excluded if they had an open fracture, a history of surgery to the wrist or hand, or any contraindication to casting such as edema or poor skin condition.

Fifty-nine patients with AO/OTA type 23C3 fractures were included in the final study. The patient group comprised 26 men and 33 women ranging in age from 18 to 69 years (average age 50.1 years). There were 28 fractures on the left hand and 31 fractures on the right hand. A 64-slice CT (Philips, Brilliance 64) was taken of the fracture region for each patient with the forearm in a neutral position. Images were obtained in the axial plane with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm, and all data was saved as digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) data. The DICOM data was then reconstructed into 3D images using the CT bone segmentation function in Mimics soft (version 18.0, Materialise NV Technologielaan, Leuven, Belgium). A threshold of 250 Hounsfield units was used to identify fracture fragments.

As shown in Fig. 1, the fracture fragments were characterized in the axial, sagittal, and coronal CT planes. The coordinate system of the model was standardized to the x-, y-, and z-axes in Mimics. The Lister tuber was the origin point, with the x-axis oriented in the radial–ulnar direction, the y-axis in the volar–dorsal direction, and the z-axis in the proximal–distal direction. Using this 3D model, the displacement between bone fragments could be measured. After recording the fracture gaps, the fragments were reduced and the 3D models were exported to the 3-Matic software (version 10.0, Materialise NV Technologielaan, Leuven, Belgium) for further analysis. All 31 models of right-sided radii were mirrored to make the orientation match that of the left-sided radii.

Fig. 1

3D reconstructionof distal radius fracture: a coronal plane; b sagittal plane; c axial plane; d 3D model. RS-radial styloid, DMF- dorsal medial fragment, VMF-volar medial fragment

Individual maps of all 59 DRFs were first created, which were then used to create a single color-coded fracture map using the process described below. Fracture line density was color-coded from blue (low density) to deep red (high density) (Fig. 2b). On the radiocarpal joint surface, the heat map of the C3 fracture shows a relatively intact volar medial fragment (green) and a high concentration of fractures on the dorsal ridge of the lunate fossa (red).

Fig. 2

The distribution and heat mapping of the fracture lines in the comminution zone of the intra-articular distal radius fractures (DRFs): a Fracture lines were distributed on the distal radius surface. b Fracture line density was color-coded from blue (low density, zero fracture lines) to deep red (high density, 20 fracture lines crossing the region)

The orientation and alignment of anatomical landmarks (radial styloid, sigmoid notch, and volar cortex) were standardized across all models to allow for direct comparison. After plotting the fracture lines for each individual DRF, these individual maps were superimposed to create a compilation heat map showing the density of fracture lines (width = 3 mm). Figure 3 shows the heat map of the distal radii.

Fig. 3

The heat map of the distal radii: a On the volar view, the fracture lines were mainly located on the volar cortex and had an arc-like appearance. b On the dorsal view, the fracture lines were concentrated around the circumference of the Lister tubercle. c View of the radial styloid process showing the fracture lines around radial styloid process. d View of the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) showing concentrations of fracture lines around two specific regions of the middle and dorsal side in the sigmoid notch

Patient characteristics and fracture measurements are summarized as means and standard deviations. Comparisons between fragments were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 with a one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA). A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Patient demographics and fracture characteristics

As detailed in Table 1, among the subgroups of C3 fractures, the majority were type C3.2 (n = 40). The fractures were characterized by radial inclination, volar tilt and radial length. In the subgroups, there was no significant difference in radial inclination (P = 0.15) and volar tilt (P = 0.82). There was a significant difference in radial length (P = 0.005).

Table 1 Patient demographics and fracture characteristics

Fracture fragment articular surface area

If the displacement between two fracture fragments was less than 1 mm, then this was not regarded as a fracture in this study and the particular bone section was considered intact. As shown in Table 2, of the 59 C3 fractures in this study, 35 cases (59.3%) fit within Melone’s classification and 24 cases (40.7%) did not. A total of 59 C3 fractures created 237 articular fragments, with 139 being classified as Melone fragments and 98 falling outside this classification. Among the Melone fractures, the volar medial fragments had the highest ratio of intact fragments (88.6%), followed by the radial styloid (80%), and dorsal medial (42.9%). Therefore, the volar medial fragment was the most intact, and the dorsal medial fragment was the most comminuted.

Table 2 Baseline fracture fragment characteristics after reduction in 3D model

It can be seen that the area of the radial styloid fragment was 170.7 ± 111.7 mm2 [range 17.49–451.3 mm2], the area of the volar medial fragment was 165.3 ± 100.4 mm2 [range 11.45–451.3 mm2], and the area of the dorsal medial fragment was 86.85 ± 78.16 mm2 [range 10.21–367.3 mm2]. There was a significance difference in articular surface area among the Melone fragments (P = 0.002). The articular surface area of the radial styloid occupied about 40.2% of the total radial-carpal surface area, with the volar medial side accounting for 39.1% and dorsal medial accounting for 20.6%. This equates to a ratio of roughly 2:2:1, which means that the dorsal articular surface covers 20% of total surface area and is the smallest region of the radius.


Severely comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal radius can be challenging to treat. Restoration of congruity of the articular surface, radial length, radial tilt angle, and volar tilt is important for a good clinical result. Failure to achieve and maintain anatomic restoration can lead to post-traumatic arthritis, distal radioulnar joint instability, and ulnar impaction syndrome, with resultant pain, joint stiffness, and decreased motion and strength [11, 12]. These are primarily procedure-related when the surgeon holds a vague recognition of the characteristics of comminuted intra-articular fractures, and the morphology of the fracture fragments [13].

Fractures of the distal radius have many types and classifications. These classifications include the following: Frykman, Melone, AO/OTA, and Fernandez classification [14, 15]. Each type will require a specific understanding of the classification and management of the fractures (not all of them can be treated with a cast). Some classifications do not suffice for individual communication-related use in daily practice (Table 3) [16, 17]. There is no consensus in the literature about the ideal classification of the distal radius fracture for the clinical practice. The Melone system is simply and widely used for classifying the morphology of DRFs. However, the Melone classification system is based on X-ray data rather than accurate physiological measurements. More recently, 3D reconstruction of CT images has been used to assess the comminution of intra-articular DRFs [18]. This study was designed to assess whether the Melone system was suitable for classifying all DRF fragments, especially for comminuted DRFs.

Table 3 Pros and cons of the classifications of the distal radius fracture

The results of this study showed that the crossing concentration of fracture lines on the radiocarpal surface and the fracture line concentrated regions of the middle 1/3 and the dorsal 1/3 of the sigmoid notch. On the radiocarpal joint surface, the heat map of the C3 fracture shows a relatively intact volar medial fragment and a high concentration of fractures on the dorsal ridge of the lunate fossa. Also, we found that the dorsal medial fragments were relatively small. The Melone classification does not include the distal radioulnar joint integrity, soft tissue injuries, and Melone component size. To the author’s knowledge, the Melone components were given the most detailed account of articular surface by using fracture mapping to date.

A key finding of this study was that the Melone classification system was not suitable for characterizing all C3 fractures. Teunis et al. reported that the Melone system could allow for up to 76% (38/50) of fractures to be classified, but this current study found that only 59.3% (35/59) of C3 fractures fit within the Melone system [3]. For the Melone groups, the ratio of articular surface of the radial styloid to volar medial to dorsal medial articular area was roughly 2:2:1, meaning the dorsal medial fragments were relatively small. For the non-Melone fractures, Table 2 shows the various other fracture patterns that appeared in this study.

Another key finding of this study is that the fracture lines are mainly located on the dorsal portion of the radius and around Lister’s tuber (Fig. 3). The general approach is to first reduce the fragments and press on Lister’s tuber or use an alternative means to maintain the tuber anatomy, and then secure with a plate or Kirschner wire [19]. It has been reported that alignment of the volar fragment with the radial styloid is more critical than the dorsal fragment as the dorsal fragment may not routinely benefit from specific reduction and fixation [3]. The dorsal fragment is not an isolated articular surface of the distal radius but an important area with dense trabecular bone in the dorsal aspect of the distal radius. Severe intra-articular fractures of the distal radius with comminuted, displaced, and malrotated fragments are difficult to stabilize using standard plates or screws. There are also challenges with treating the fractured joint in cases of substantial cartilage loss and extended metaphyseal/subchondral bony defects [19]. The importance of the dorsal medial fragment is that it helps to restore volar cortical alignment and thus increases the stability after manipulation of distal radial fractures [20]. Reducing and securing the small and comminuted dorsal medial fragments, especially around the articular area, are beneficial for restoring good functionality to the wrist.

The practicality and accuracy of fracture mapping have been reported in a number of studies investigating scapula bone fractures, tibial plateau fractures, radial head fractures, and ulnar pulley articular fractures [21,22,23,24]. The radial fracture map developed in this current study can also be used to assess existing fracture classification systems. An accurate map of fracture fragments allows for optimal preoperative planning, which includes the selection of a suitable surgical approach and fixation constructs. The results presented in this study provide insight into fracture morphology, which can assist with fracture classification and the design of biomechanical studies, ultimately aiding treatment.

There are some limitations to this study that should be noted. The first is that the analysis was carried out retrospectively on patients recruited over a short period of time. The second is the patient study group was relatively small, which could have influenced the clinical outcomes. For example, the patients with C3.2 and C3.3 fractures were roughly 3 times older than the patients with C3.1 fractures. The reason is that the sample of C3.1 fractures was so small that the comparability of populations is weakened. Finally, the data was primarily sourced from CT images, so for more accurate results, this should be accessed through by a randomized clinical trial.

In conclusion, we believe that severely comminuted intra-articular (AO/OTA 23C3) distal radial fractures should be assessed using fracture mapping before beginning any invasive treatments. The traditional Melone’s concept is not suitable for characterizing all C3 fractures. The fracture comminution regions of the dorsal fragments should be fixed using a suitable angle and positioning of the screws or Kirschner wire so as to achieve a stable reduction.

Availability of data and materials

All the data will be available upon motivated request to the corresponding author of the present paper.



Computed tomography


Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Arbeitsgemeinschaftfür Osteosynthesefragen


Three dimensional


Distal radioulnar joint


Distal radius fracture


Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine

one-way ANOVA:

one-way analysis of variance


  1. 1.

    Horst TA, Jupiter JB. Stabilisation of distal radius fractures: lessons learned and future directions. Injury. 2016;47(2):313–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Stevenson I, Carnegie CA, Christie EM, Kumar K, Johnstone AJ. Displaced distal radial fractures treated using volar locking plates: maintenance of normal anatomy. J Trauma Injury Infect Critical Care. 2009;67(3):612–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Teunis Teun BN, Bart L, Dirk TM, David R. Melone’s concept revisited: 3D quantification of fragment displacement. J Hand Microsurg. 2016;08(01):027–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nakanishi Y, Omokawa S, Shimizu T, Nakano K, Kira T, Tanaka Y. Intra-articular distal radius fractures involving the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ): three dimensional computed tomography-based classification. J Orthop Sci. 2013;18(5):788–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Melone CP Jr. Articular fractures of the distal radius. Orthop Clin North Am. 1984;15(2):217–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ploegmakers JJ, Mader K, Pennig D, Verheyen CC. Four distal radial fracture classification systems tested amongst a large panel of Dutch trauma surgeons. Injury. 2007;38(11):1268–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Armitage BM, Wijdicks CA, Tarkin IS, Schroder LK, Marek DJ, Zlowodzki M, et al. Mapping of scapular fractures with three-dimensional computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(21):2222–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Misir A, Ozturk K, Kizkapan TB, Yildiz KI, Gur V, Sevencan A. Fracture lines and comminution zones in OTA/AO type 23C3 distal radius fractures: the distal radius map. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018;26(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Christersson A, Nysjo J, Berglund L, Malmberg F, Sintorn IM, Nystrom I, et al. Comparison of 2D radiography and a semi-automatic CT-based 3D method for measuring change in dorsal angulation over time in distal radius fractures. Skelet Radiol. 2016;45(6):763–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Xie X, Zhan Y, Dong M, He Q, Lucas JF, Zhang Y, et al. Two and three-dimensional CT mapping of Hoffa fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(21):1866–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bentohami A, de Burlet K, de Korte N, van den Bekerom MP, Goslings JC, Schep NW. Complications following volar locking plate fixation for distal radial fractures: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39(7):745–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Rogachefsky RA, Lipson SR, Applegate B, Ouellette EA, Savenor AM, McAuliffe JA. Treatment of severely comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius by open reduction and combined internal and external fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(4):509–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang X, Zhang Y, Fan J, Yuan F, Tang Q, Xian CJ. Radiol med: analyses of fracture line distribution in intra-articular distal radius fractures; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wæver D, Madsen ML, Rölfing JHD, Borris LC, Henriksen M, Nagel LL, et al. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify. Injury. 2018;49(Suppl 1):S29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Siripakarn Y, Niempoog S, Boontanapibul K. The comparative study of reliability and reproducibility of distal radius’ fracture classification among: AO frykman and Fernandez classification systems. J Med Assoc Thail. 2013;96(1):52–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Garcia-Elias M, Folgar MA. The management of wrist injuries: an international perspective. Injury. 2006;37(11):1049–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Fernandez DL. Distal radius fracture: the rationale of a classification. Chir Main. 2001;20(6):411–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Daneshvar P, Willing R, Pahuta M, Grewal R, King GJ. Osseous anatomy of the distal radioulnar joint: an assessment using 3-dimensional modeling and clinical implications. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41(11):1071–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pillukat T, Schadel-Hopfner M, Prommersberger KJ. Complex fragmentation of the articular surface of the distal radius: management with small Kirschner wires and bone graft. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012;16(1):1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Phillips AR, Al-Shawi A. Restoration of the volar cortex: predicting instability after manipulation of distal radial fractures. Injury. 2014;45(12):1896–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cole PA, Mehrle RK, Bhandari M, Zlowodzki M. The pilon map: fracture lines and comminution zones in OTA/AO type 43C3 pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27(7):e152–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Molenaars RJ, Mellema JJ, Doornberg JN, Kloen P. Tibial plateau fracture characteristics: computed tomography mapping of lateral, medial, and bicondylar fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(18):1512–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mellema JJ, Eygendaal D, van Dijk CN, Ring D, Doornberg JN. Fracture mapping of displaced partial articular fractures of the radial head. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016;25(9):1509–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mitchell PM, Harms KA, Lee AK, Collinge CA. Morphology of the posterior malleolar fracture associated with a spiral distal tibia fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(4):185–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to acknowledge Li-Li Chen for her help in the methodology. We also thank Dr. Colin McClean for proofreading.


The study was supported by the project of academic leader of health system in Pudong New Area, Shanghai (PWRd2019-05), Science and Technology Project of Nantong City (No. MSZ19166)

Author information




Ming Ni designed the study. Shuang Li and Ying-Qi Zhang followed up the patients and documented the data. Gu-Heng Wang and Kai Li analyzed and interpreted the data. Shuang Li and Jian Wang wrote the manuscript, and Ming Ni approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Ni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Pudong New Area Peoples’ Hospital affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Competing interests

The authors report no conflict of interest related to this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, G. et al. Melone’s concept revisited in comminuted distal radius fractures: the three-dimensional CT mapping. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 222 (2020).

Download citation


  • Melone’s concept
  • Dorsal medial fragment
  • Volar medial fragment
  • Fracture mapping
  • Distal radius fracture