Skip to main content

Anterior percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal decompression of the spinal cord for single-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: The technical interpretation and 2 years of clinical follow-up

Abstract

Background

ACDF is the standard procedure for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), but a long-term follow-up has been revealed some associated complications of swallowing discomfort, displacement of the fusion device, and accelerated degeneration of the adjacent segment.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of anterior percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal decompression of the spinal cord (APFETDSC) for single-segment CSM and to analyze the clinical efficacy, surgical characteristics, and complication prevention.

Methods

A total of 32 patients who underwent APFETDSC for single-segment CSM from Aug. 2015 to Apr. 2017 were reviewed. Operating time, time of walking out of bed postoperation, length of hospitalization, complications, neck pain visual analog scale (VAS), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA) were evaluated. Measurement of intervertebral height (HI) of surgical segments on cervical neutral X-ray, Harrison’s method was used to measure cervical spine angle (CSA).

Results

The operation time was 103.3 ± 12.95 min, time of walking out of bed after surgery was 19.81 ± 4.603 h, the length of postoperative hospital stay was 57.48 ± 19.48 h. The postoperative neck pain VAS and JOA were significantly improved compared with preoperation(p < 0.001). The postoperative HI was statistical significance decreased compared with preoperation(p < 0.001), but the HI reduction was less than 0.5 mm, without adverse clinical symptoms. The postoperative CSA was significantly improved compared with preoperative(p < 0.001). The excellent and good rate was 87.5%, and the JOA improvement rate was 75.52 ± 11.11%. There was no cervical instability, vertebral fracture, wound infection, and other complications.

Conclusions

APFETDSC is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique with small auxiliary injuries for single-segment CSM while avoiding the sequelae of ACDF. Its short-term clinical efficacy was good and no significant effect on cervical stability.

Introduction

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a series of clinical symptoms and signs that result from cervical spine degeneration and compression of the spinal cord, and patients are primarily characterized by numbness in the upper extremities or lower limbs, thoracic fasciculation, clumsy hands, feelings of walking on cotton, and even sphincter dysfunction [1]. Regarding the treatment of CSM patients, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was adopted in 1950, and this procedure was widely accepted and is now the standard procedure for the treatment of CSM [1, 2]. Although good interbody fusion is obtained, this procedure can lead to changes in the biomechanics of the cervical vertebrae, and there is a shortage of adjacent segment degeneration acceleration, and complications of dysphagia, dysphonia, hematoma, and so on arose due to the use of a front plate and the fusion of the local segments [3, 4].

Due to the technique of spinal endoscopy for the treatment of spinal degenerative diseases presents superior characteristics compared with open surgery because of the provision of a clear view, minimal trauma, ability to excise targeted prominent lesions, and significantly reduced perioperative complications [5, 6]. Spinal endoscopy has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, and endoscopic surgery for cervical degeneration diseases is a hotspot in spine surgery [7,8,9]. Endoscopic discectomy via the transdisc approach for cervical disc herniation has been used in the clinic, but further damage to the degenerated disc via the transdisc approach is inevitable and accelerates the loss of intervertebral height, even can cause spontaneous bone fusion in the later stage [10, 11]. George et al. reported the transcorporeal method to dispose cervical spondylosis [12]. Sakai T et al. reported on the use of the anterior opening transcorporeal approach to establish tunnel with microscopically assisted excision of the protruding discs and acquired good therapeutic effect [13]. We reported a cohort study using percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal cervical discectomy [14]. This procedure focuses on soft prominent disc tissue, which does not elucidate in effective decompression of the spinal cord by disc-osteophytes, with the further application of spinal endoscopy in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. This study utilized the natural space between the anterior visceral sheath of the cervical spine and the vascular sheath by APFETDSC for single-segment CSM. Whether segmental instability and acceleration of cervical degeneration can occur on postoperative of APFETDSC has become the focus of specialists. This study aimed to analyze the early clinical outcomes of APFETDSC cases and to evaluate the clinical safety and effects on cervical spine stability.

Methods

General information

This is a single-center clinical retrospective study. From Aug. 2015 to Apr. 2017, 32 patients with single-segment CSM underwent spinal cord decompression treatment with the anterior percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal procedure: 18 males and 14 females of 59.25 ± 6.849 years (51~73 years). The disease course was 8.766 ± 4.887 months (3–21 months). The distribution of clinical symptoms along with the type of lesion and their level was shown in Table 1. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) scans to identify the characteristics and exact location of the lesion. The compression of the spinal cord was mainly attributable to single-segment protruding discs-osteophytes complex [15]. And CT scan was utilized for preoperative measurement of the depth and direction of the tunnel trajectory. Patients were excluded for cervical instability, calcification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, yellow ligaments or simple posterior compression, and compression of the two or more segments spinal cord; Cases of coagulant dysfunction, intervertebral infection, cervical malformation, and anterior cervical surgery history were excluded. The study was performed after obtaining due permission from the local institutional review board as well as informed consent from the patients.

Table 1 Clinical features and affected level (n = 32)

The spinal endoscopy system (SPINENDOS GmbH., Germany) comprised a 30°-angled scope, a 4.3-mm working channel with a water irrigation system, a 6.9-mm outer sheath, and related surgical instruments, a gimmi-SPINENDOS digital camera system. And a low-temperature radiofrequency system (ArdthroCare Co., California, USA).

Surgical methods

The operations were performed by the corresponding author. All patients had gastric tube inserted prior to the surgery and were administered general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, and the patient was placed in the supine position and kept the neck slightly overstretched. Downward traction was applied to the upper limbs to avoid the blocking of the lower cervical intervertebral space on X-ray. Fifteen milligrams of iodohydride was injected into the gastric tube to show the position of the esophagus under the c-arm perspective and the skin puncture point was marked on the far side of the esophagus. Strict surgical disinfection was performed, and sterile waterproof coating covers were used in the surgical area to avoid flushing the sterile dressing. According to preoperative CT and MRI, the locations of the disc-osteophyte complex were identified (Fig. 1a–d), and the trajectory of the osseous channel was designed (Fig. 2a). The puncture point was located in the lower part of the lower vertebral body under the section of the responsible segment. Using the “two-fingering” technique at the puncture point, the endotracheal sheath of the esophagus and the vascular nerve sheath were pushed aside to touch the front of the vertebral body, and a puncture-safe area was created with the skin pressed to the vertebral body [16, 17]. A puncture needle was inserted between the fingers. The position of the puncture point and the direction of the guide needle in the vertebral body were established according to the C-arm X-ray perspective (Fig. 2c, d). When the guide needle properly inserted the vertebral body fixation, and the expansion sleeve (D = 6.3 mm) was inserted along the guide needle, the tube was slowly rotated and placed in the protective casing (D = 8.5 mm). Under the protection of the trephine casing, according to the target of disc-osteophyte complex, the bone tunnel was gradually established. The bone tunnel continued until the trephine penetrated the posterior margin of the vertebral body in the C-arm monitoring perspective (Fig. 2e–f), and the trephine was properly shaken to remove the vertebral bone. The trephine protective casing was replaced with a work casing (7.6 mm) (Fig. 2g, h). The endoscopic operating system was inserted through the casing, and the endoscopic decompression procedure began. Continuous saline irrigation was used to maintain a clear view during the operation. Various types of medullary forceps were used to remove the protruding disc tissue. A high-speed diamond burr and rongeur were used to clear up the disc-osteophyte complex (Fig. 2i), and epidural capsule decompression and pulsation were acquired (Fig. 2j). Hemorrhaging of the posterior longitudinal ligament or epidural was stopped with radiofrequency hemostasis. When no active bleeding was observed, the work casing was stepped out of to the front of the vertebral body. The work casing was removed, a drainage tube was not required due to no active bleeding, and the incision was sutured and covered with a sterile dressing to complete the procedure. On the first postoperative day, antibiotics, hormones, and mannitol were administered, a neck protection collar was applied, and the patient walked away from the bed. The patients were discharged 2–4 days after surgery, wore the neck collars and oral administration of mecobalamine and B-complex vitamins improve neurological function for 4–6 weeks.

Fig. 1.
figure1

Preoperative CT images indicating that the cervical 5/6 intervertebral disc-osteophyte complex was formed(a, b); Preoperative MRI images indicating that the spinal cord was clearly compressed by disc-osteophyte complex (c), and the abnormal signal was showed (d)

Fig. 2.
figure2

Schematic diagram of operation channel planning established via vertebral body before surgery (a). Preoperative gastric tube indwelling, puncture site localization, and surface marking schematic diagram (b). The position of the positioning needle was determined by the anterior-posterior(AP)and lateral C-arm X-ray perspective(c, d).The trephine were used to establish the bone channel and C-arm fluoroscopy was used to monitor the direction and depth of the trephine (e, f). AP and lateral C-arm X-ray fluoroscopy show the location of the work sleeve (g, h). In the intraoperative endoscopic image, the arrow indicates the intervertebral disc-osteophyte complex, and the triangle indicates the posterior longitudinal ligament(i). Intraoperative images of decompression of the spinal cord under endoscope, arrows indicating the posterior margin of the upper vertebral body, and triangles indicating the dura sac (j)

Typical case: Male, 51 years old, neck pain accompanied by numbness, and weakness of limbs, with the left side as the focus, C5~6 disc-osteophyte complex protrudes into the spinal canal, resulting in spinal stenosis and compression of the spinal cord (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4).

Fig. 3.
figure3

Postoperative CT showing that the disc-osteophyte complex had been removed, three-dimensional reconstruction showing the complete vertebral body tunnel, the vertebral body height is not lost, and no fracture occurs (a, b). The spinal cord decompression was sufficient on MRI examination(c, d)

Fig. 4.
figure4

A 6-month postoperative CT examination revealed that the bone tunnel had healed and no fracture occurs (a, b). The last follow-up X-ray radiographs in flexion and extension positions of cervical spine(c, d) showed that the physiological curvature of the cervical spine remained good and there was no cervical spine instability

Evaluation indicators and methods

Operative time, surgical complications (spinal cord injury, dural injury, esophageal vascular injury, hematoma, wound infection, etc.), postoperative time of getting out of bed and postoperative hospitalization were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate neck pain and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score (JOA) to evaluate clinical neurological function. The degree of spinal decompression was objectively assessed by postoperative cervical MRI, and vertebral structure was assessed by CT examination. The HI between the upper and lower endplate center of the operative segment was measured by neutral cervical X-ray. CSA was measured using Harrison’s method [18]: an acute angle formed by the intersection of C2 and C7 posterior vertebral tangent lines. The patients in this study were followed up at the outpatient clinic at 1 week, 6 months, and 24 months after surgery. Methods of follow-up: VAS and JOA scores were performed, and modified MacNab standard was added for the last follow-up to evaluate the excellent-good rate of treatment. X-ray plain film of anterioposterior and lateral of cervical spine was taken to measure the HI of the surgical segment and the CSA. The stability of the operative segments was observed by X-ray plain film of the hyperextension and hyperflexion of the cervical spine.

Statistical analyses

SPSS18.0 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. Paired t test was used to compare the differences of HI and CSC pre- and post-operative, a positive significance level was assumed at probability of less than 0.05.

Results

Clinical outcomes: the operations were successful in all 32 patients and clinical symptoms have been improved significantly after surgery. The operation time was 103.3 ± 12.95 min (range, 80–125 min). The time of walking out of bed after surgery was 19.81 ± 4.603 h, the length of postoperative hospital stay was 65.22 ± 16.64 h, and the mean follow-up period was 28.97 ± 3.685 months(range from 24 to 36 months). There was no obvious bleeding, no major complications of esophageal, arteriovenous, or spinal cord injuries occurred during the operations.

The changes of VAS, JOA, HI, and CSA of preoperative and postoperative in this group were shown in Table 2. Analysis results show that the postoperative neck pain VAS score was significantly reduced compared with preoperation(p < 0.001). The postoperative JOA score was significantly increased compared with preoperation(p < 0.001). The VAS score at 6 months postoperative decreased further than that at 1 week postoperatively(p < 0.001). The JOA score at 6 months postoperatively improved further than at 1 week postoperatively(p < 0.001). The VAS and JOA scores at 24 months postoperatively were not statistically significant compared with 6 months postoperatively(p > 0.05). The postoperative HI was statistically significant compared with preoperation(p < 0.001), but the HI reduction was less than 0.5 mm and without adverse clinical symptoms. The postoperative cervical curvature was significantly improved compared with preoperation(p < 0.001). Compared with 1 week after surgery, the six months, and last follow-up of the HI and CSC were no statistically significant(p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the distribution of clinical features and treatment effect were shown in Table 3. The excellent and good rate was 87.5%, and the JOA improvement rate was 75.52 ± 11.11%; there was no significant reduction in adjacent segment intervertebral space and osteophyte hyperplasia, and no postoperative complications of postpharyngeal foreign sensation, vertebral fracture, recurrence of symptoms, and intervertebral instability were observed.

Table 2 The VAS, JOA,HI and CSA change pre-operative and post-operative (x ± s n = 32).
Table 3 Clinical features and treatment effect at last follow-up

Complications

All patients had mild intraoperative neck edema, and the edema was subsided in 2~4 h after surgery. After the removal of the casing, three cases of bleeding in the cut were observed, and the bleeding was stopped after a few minutes of compression. One patient experienced difficulty breathing due to laryngeal spasms, which was improved after the administration of a pressurized oxygen supply and control the spasms. No dysphagia, hoarseness, spinal cord injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, infection, or other intra- or postoperative complications occurred.

Discussion

CSM is often caused by the compression of the anterior spinal artery with disc-osteophyte complex and resulting in varying degrees of spinal cord injury [1, 15, 19]. For patients in whom conservative treatment for more than 3 months is ineffective, surgical treatment needs to be considered. The purpose of the surgical treatment is decompression of the spinal cord [2, 20, 21]. Currently, the surgical methods of CSM primarily include ACDF and artificial cervical intervertebral disc replacement (ACDR). Due to the strict surgical indications of ACDR, its potential complications include prosthesis looseness, subsidence, vertebral periodization, late fusion, wear, and other problems [22, 23]. Although traditional ACDF can achieve good fusion, a long-term follow-up has revealed such associated complications as swallowing discomfort, foreign body sensations, hoarseness, plate looseness, displacement of the fusion device, and acceleration of the degeneration of the adjacent segment [23,24,25,26]. Hilibrand et al. reported a 2.9% annual incidence of symptomatic adjacent segments of 374 patients 10 years after receiving ACDF [27].

In recent years, with the continuous development and optimization of optical technology, channel technology, endoscopic techniques, and the improvements in spine surgery techniques, the past contraindications have become indications for the percutaneous endoscopic treatment technique. The percutaneous endoscopic technique has become the standard procedure or optimal surgery for the treatment of lumbar disc herniations [5, 6, 8, 25, 28]. Currently, the percutaneous endoscopic technique is used to treat cervical intervertebral disc herniation; the technical trauma is small and has been taken seriously by some scholars. This attention to the work casing transdisc approach is necessary because this approach can cause new damage to the disc, accelerated intervertebral degeneration, and intervertebral height reduction [9, 10, 26,27,28,29]. Therefore, transdisc approach has not been widely used in clinical practice, and so, transcorporal approach is a reasonable surgical strategy.

Most CSM cases are due to the protrusion of a cervical intervertebral disc-osteophyte complex. The symptoms of spinal cord injury are caused by the compression of the ventral side [1, 19, 22]. Effectively completing ventral decompression of the spinal cord and achieving ideal clinical effect through the posterior technique is very difficult [3, 21, 30]. Therefore, the anterior transcorporal approach with an endoscopic technique is an effective method for the treatment of CSM. To avoid iatrogenic injuries caused by transdisc approach, this study of APFETDSC demonstrated minimally invasive, direct decompression of the cervical spinal cord, maintains the physiological curvature of the cervical spine and the stability of the operative segment [16, 21, 22], and the biomechanical structure of the disc is well preserved. By applying the two-finger pressing separation method, the endotracheal sheath of the esophagus was pushed to the medial aspect, and the vascular nerve sheath was pushed to the outside [11, 17]. The skin was kept close to the vertebral body, and the position of the puncture needle was set and the injury of related viscera could be avoided. To identify the relationship between the esophagus and the puncture needle with the developing gastric tube, gradual loosening and expansion were achieved through the graded casing to safely place the working casing. Fractures were avoided because of the integrity of the vertebral body walls. A careful analysis of the compression area of the spinal cord must be performed before the operation to make detailed plans to build up the bone tunnel. The establishment of a tunnel to the spinal cord compression position in the vertebral body is the key to complete decompression of the spinal cord and guaranteeing the overall biomechanical properties of the cervical spine. To facilitate the operation, the cervical spine should be slightly overstretched. Nakai S et al. reported a complete operation by established a bone tunnel from the upper vertebral body of the lesion disc [13]. We simulated this procedure and encountered difficulties due to the blocking of the mandible. Therefore, for all cases in this group, the transcorporal approach from the lower vertebral body of the disc was selected. Careful removal of the disc-osteophyte complex tissue is necessary for fully decompression of the spinal cord and the dural sac should be fully raised and fluctuated [31, 32]. Special attention should be given to the strengths of various operating tools to avoid compression injuries to the spinal cord [33, 34].

After surgery, all patients exhibited significant improvements in limb sensation and movement disorders and no vascular and esophageal injury, and no deterioration of the spinal cord nerve function was observed. The clinical effect of this procedure was consistent with the relevant authors’ experiences [10, 35, 36]. Wen-Ching Tzaan et al. evaluated the clinical outcome data from 86 patients, and 91% of patients achieved significant postoperative clinical improvements, but there were two surgery-related complications (2%) of headache and carotid artery injury [16]. In our study, three cases of bleeding in the incision after the removal of the casing occurred, and the bleeding was stopped after a few minutes of compression. One patient had difficulty breathing and laryngeal spasms, but there was no visible swelling in the neck, and no blood were found. The spasms were improved after the administration of a pressurized oxygen supply. Incisional hemorrhage is related to capillary injury, and the bleeding can stop spontaneously. The work casing was removed when active bleeding was observed, and radiofrequency hemostatic treatment was applied. Due to the loose clearance of the cervical tissue, continuous saline irrigation was applied during the operation, which resulted in obvious cervical subcutaneous edema, but all of these occurrences were absorbed by themselves within 2 to 4 h after surgery. The patients were followed up for more than 24 months. At the last follow-up, there was no significant reduction in adjacent segment intervertebral space and osteophyte hyperplasia and no obvious changes in HI and CSC, and no complications of vertebral fracture was observed. The excellent-good rate reached 87.5%. In the patients of fair efficacy, one patient was given oral medication for neck pain with numbness and discomfort at the fingertip of the upper extremity due to frequent participation in sedentary recreational activities and was followed up. One patient suffered from neck pain after neck trauma and had obvious symptoms during hyperextension and hyperflexion activities. Re-examination of X-ray showed instability of the upper adjacent segment, and the patient refused surgery and required follow-up observation. Another two cases were associated with diabetes mellitus with peripheral nerve symptoms.

All patients chose general anesthesia, which avoided nervous, anxiety, and uncooperativeness that could be associated with local anesthesia. Although the sample size of the study group was small, the results of final follow-up were encouraging. Compared with the methods of ACDF and ACDR, APFETDSC is an alternative and effective treatment for single-segment CSM after considering the patient’s condition, open and minimally invasive cognition, whether the internal fixation plants are acceptable, treatment costs, and other comprehensive factors. The successful application of this technique requires the strict selection of cases and a rigorous and meticulous surgical operation. The operator needs to have a very rich experience in open cervical spine surgery and a very skilled operative experience in lumbar endoscopy. This study goes along with some limitations. First, for patients and doctors, the deficiency of this technique is obvious radiological exposure, and surgery time is longer than open surgery. Second, the clinical efficacy of this technique also requires further long-term follow-up evaluation of many cases. In addition, the sample size was small and only addressed single-segment disc-osteophyte complex also the limitations.

Conclusions

APFETDSC is a safe and effective minimally invasive operation technique with small auxiliary injuries for CSM while avoiding the sequelae of ACDF or ACDR. Its short-term clinical efficacy was good and no significant effect on cervical stability. But the long-term efficacy needs longer time and more cases followed up summary.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Abbreviations

ACDF:

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

ACDR:

Artificial cervical disc replacement

APFETDSC:

Anterior percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporal decompression of the spinal cord

CSM:

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy

JOA:

Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores

VAS:

Visual analog scale

References

  1. 1.

    Iyer A, Azad TD, Tharin S. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clinical Spine Surgery. 2016;16(3):176–87.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bram R, Fiore S, Labiak JJ, Davis RP. Combined anterior-posterior decompression and fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. American Journal of Orthopedics. 2017;46(2):E97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Liu Y, Luo X, Zhou J, Li N, Peng S, Rong P, et al. Prognosis of posterior osteophyte after anterior cervical decompression and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy using three-dimensional computed tomography study. European Spine Journal. 2016;25(6):1861–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chen J, Liu Z, Zhong G, et al. Surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients: a retrospective study. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2015;132:47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kambin P, Mccullen G, Parke W, Regan JJ, Schaffer JL, Yuan H. Minimally invasive arthroscopic spinal surgery. Instructional Course Lectures. 1997;46:143.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Kambin P, Savitz MH. Arthroscopic microdiscectomy: an alternative to open disc surgery. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine New York. 2000;67(4):283–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Tsou PM, Yeung CA, Yeung AT. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure. Spine Journal. 2004;4(5):564–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Raiturker PP, Chae YS. Percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for extraforaminal lumbar disc herniations: extraforaminal targeted fragmentectomy technique using working channel endoscope. Spine. 2007;32(2):93–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G. Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes. Spine. 2008;33(9):940–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lee JH, Lee SH. Clinical and radiographic changes after percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a long-term follow-up. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2014;32(12):663–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yang JS, Chu L, Chen L, Chen F, Ke ZY, Deng ZL. Anterior or posterior approach of full-endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical intervertebral disc herniation? A comparative cohort study. Spine. 2014;39(21):1743–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    George B, Zerah M, Lot G, Hurth M. Oblique transcorporeal approach to anteriorly located lesions in the cervical spinal canal. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1993;121(3–4):187–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sakai T, Katoh S, Sairyo K, Tamura T, Hirohashi N, Higashino K, et al. Anterior transvertebral herniotomy for cervical disc herniation. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 2009;22(6):408–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Du Q, Wang X, Qin JP, Friis T, Kong WJ, Cai YQ, et al. Percutaneous full-endoscopic anterior transcorporeal procedure for cervical disc herniation: a novel procedure and early follow-up study. World Neurosurgery. 2017;112:e23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ajiboye RM, Zoller SD, Ashana AA, Sharma A, Sheppard W, Holly LT. Regression of disc-osteophyte complexes following laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2017;11(3):17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tzaan WC. Anterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for cervical intervertebral disc herniation: outcome, complications, and technique. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 2011;24(7):421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Deng ZL, Chu L, Chen L, Yang JS. Anterior transcorporeal approach of percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for disc herniation at the c4-c5 levels: a technical note. SPINE JOURNAL. 2016;16(5):659–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ding Y, Rong D, Wang X, Li C. To evaluate the cervical spine curvature and growth rate for studying the pathogenesis of hirayama disease in adolescents. Zhonghua nei ke za zhi [Chinese journal of internal medicine]. 2015;54(8):721–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nakagawa H, Okazaki T, Saito K. Surgical strategies in management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. World Neurosurgery. 2015;84(2):220–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    El-Zuway S, Farrokhyar F, Kachur E. Myelopathic signs and functional outcome following cervical decompression surgery: a proposed myelopathy scale. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2016;24(6):871–7 1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Scheufler KM, Diesing D. Cervical laminectomy and laminoplasty as treatment of spinal stenosis. Surgery of the Spine and Spinal Cord. 2016:161–76.

  22. 22.

    Cheung WY, Arvinte D, Wong YW, Luk KDK, Cheung KMC. Neurological recovery after surgical decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy - a prospective study. International Orthopaedics. 2008;32(2):273–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tannous O, Jazini E, Ludwig SC. Anterior surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Seminars in Spine Surgery. 2014;26(2):73–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Samini F, Mashhadinejad H, Ehsaei M, Bahadorkhan G, Ashraf H. Comparison of surgical and medical treatments for cervical spondylosis: a prospective study. Neurosurgery Quarterly. 2014;24(1):18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Barbagallo G, Corbino L, Olindo G, Albanese V. Heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: is it clinically relevant? Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal. 2010;1(01):15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GBJ. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study. The Spine Journal. 2013;13(6):689–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hilibrand A. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1999;81:519–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ahn Y. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy using working channel endoscopes. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2016;13(6):601–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Oh HS, Hwang BW, Park SJ, Hsieh CS, Lee SH. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (pecd): an analysis of outcome, causes of reoperation. World Neurosurgery. 2017;102:583–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yao N, Wang C, Wang W, Wang L. Full-endoscopic technique for anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion: 5-year follow-up results of 67 cases. European Spine Journal. 2011;20(6):899–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Choi KC, Ahn Y, Lee CD, Lee SH. Combined anterior approach with transcorporeal herniotomy for a huge migrated cervical disc herniation. Korean Journal of Spine. 2011;8(4):292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shim CS, Jung TG, Lee SH. Transcorporeal approach for disc herniation at the c2-c3 level: a technical case report. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques. 2009;22(6):459–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cole WG, Stewart JG. Transcorporeal tunnel approach for unilateral cervical radiculopathy: a 2-year follow-up review and results. Min - Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery. 2010;53(03):127–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Choi G, Lee SH, Bhanot A, Chae YS, Jung B, Lee S. Modified transcorporeal anterior cervical microforaminotomy for cervical radiculopathy: a technical note and early results. European Spine Journal. 2007;16(9):1387–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ahn Y, Lee SH, Shin SW. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: clinical outcome and radiographic changes. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2005;23(4):362–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Peng CWB, Yue WM, Basit A, Guo CM, Tow BPB, Chen JLT, et al. Intermediate results of the prestige lp cervical disc replacement: clinical and radiological analysis with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine. 2011;36(2):E105–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This data collection was funded in part by Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Department joint fund. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of Guizhou provincial science and technology department nor the authors’ institutions of affiliation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WJK was responsible for the design and writing of the manuscript. ZJX and QD were responsible for the collection of data and images. GR C was responsible for the statistics and analysis of the data. WB L was responsible for the design and the revision of the article. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenbo Liao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University. Written consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

We have obtained written consent to publish from the participant to report individual patient data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, W., Xin, Z., Du, Q. et al. Anterior percutaneous full-endoscopic transcorporeal decompression of the spinal cord for single-segment cervical spondylotic myelopathy: The technical interpretation and 2 years of clinical follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 14, 461 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1474-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Percutaneous
  • Transcorporeal
  • Cervical spondylotic myelopathy
  • Full-endoscopic
  • Decompression of spinal cord
  • Efficacy