Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Does elasticity of Achilles tendon change after suture applications? Evaluation of repair area by acoustic radiation force impulse elastography

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research201813:45

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0751-z

  • Received: 1 January 2018
  • Accepted: 6 February 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Achilles tendon injuries are one of the most common tendon injuries. Surgical treatment is preferred in young and active patients. Although there are studies which evaluate the repair area with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography after surgical treatment, there are very few studies which analyzes the elasticity of the tendon by quantitative methods. ARFI (acoustic radiation force impulse) elastography is a simple and non-invasive method that can quantitatively measure the elasticity of the soft tissues. Our study aims to evaluate the elasticity in the repair area of the surgically treated Achilles tendons, compare them to the non-injured side, and evaluate the effect of the suture method to the elasticity of the repaired tendons by using ARFI elastography.

Methods

In our retrospectively designed study, 19 patients who underwent surgical treatment with Krackow and modified Kessler suture methods after the Achilles tendon rupture between 2006 and 2014 were included. Shear wave velocity (SWV) of the repaired and non-injured Achilles tendons were measured by ARFI elastography in four different positions of the ankle.

Results

It was determined that SWV in the surgically repaired tendons were significantly higher in each four different position of the ankle, compared to the non-injured side (p < 0.01), indicating less elasticity in the repaired tendons. There was no statistically significant difference between the SWV of Krackow and modified Kessler suture method groups at four different positions of the ankle (p > 0.05). AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot, VISA-A, VAS, and FAOS scores were not also statistically different between these two suture methods (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

In the repaired Achilles tendon, there is a decrease in the elasticity compared to the non-injured side. The functional and elastographic results of Krackow and modified Kessler suture methods are similar in long-term follow-ups of the patients.

Keywords

  • Achilles tendon rupture
  • Surgical repair
  • Modified Kessler method
  • Krackow method
  • Acoustic radiation force impulse
  • Elastography
  • Elasticity
  • Shear wave velocity

Background

The Achilles tendon is the strongest and largest tendon in the human body and also among the most commonly injured tendons [1]. The parallel bundle of type I collagen fibers forms the main structure of the Achilles tendon. This feature increases the tendon’s elasticity and allows the tendon to lengthen and shorten during daily activities. During the healing process, type III collagen content increases and the tendon becomes heterogeneous [2]. In addition, it is known that the tendon gets stiffer and loses its elasticity as a result of the fibrosis in the tendon and the surrounding area after healing [3]. For this reason, it is important to evaluate the repaired Achilles tendons to reveal the changes in the elasticity and structural properties.

Treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) can be done both conservatively and surgically, but the debate about the best choice of the treatment still continues. Several suture methods have been described for the repair of ATR. The most commonly used methods are Krackow and modified Kessler suture methods, and the studies have shown that no significant functional difference exists between these methods [46]. Comparisons between these two methods are mostly about the suture strength and the tendon structure after repair, but there is no study comparing the stiffness and elasticity of the repaired tendons with these two methods [46].

Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography, which is one of the new imaging methods in recent years, is based on the principle of measuring the velocity of the sound waves advancing on the tissues. In soft tissues, shear wave velocity (SWV) is low and displacement amplitude is high, while in hard tissues, SWV is high and displacement amplitude is low [7]. Therefore, it is a quantitative measure of the elasticity of the soft tissues such as muscles and tendons [8]. In addition, the ability to measure the elasticity of the tissues quantitatively without compressing the tissue minimizes the intra- and inter-observer variability between radiologists and makes the results more objective and reliable.

There are numerous biomechanical and clinical investigations after Achilles tendon repair, but there are quite few sources evaluating the elasticity of the repaired tendon with the help of imaging methods. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the elasticity of the surgically treated tendons after ATR and to compare the elasticity of the Achilles tendons repaired with different suture methods.

Methods

After obtaining approval from the local Ethics Committee, the patients over 18 years of age who were operated due to traumatic ATR between 2006 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. To minimize the effect of healing process which we know that might take over the course of 1 year, the patients with less than 4-year follow-up were not included in the study [9]. Patients who had previous oral, IM or IV steroid use, rheumatologic diseases, malignant tumors, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, spondyloarthropathies, fluoroquinolone use, post-operative re-rupture, ankle arthrosis, ankle impingement syndrome, or deep surgical site infection were not included in the study. Two female patients were excluded from the study due to their pregnancy and its possible effect to the tendon elasticity [10]. Nineteen patients met the inclusion criteria for the study and returned for clinical evaluations. The power analysis revealed that the sample size for each group should be at least seven patients, which is less than the number of patients in our groups, suggesting that the sample size is adequate. All of the patients were males. Eighteen patients were operated unilaterally while one patient was operated bilaterally. The patient who underwent bilateral repair was included in the comparisons according to suture method but was not included in the comparisons between the repaired and the non-injured side. The functional evaluations of the patients were made by visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot, FAOS Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and VISA-A scoring (Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment – Achilles).

The measurements were made by the same musculoskeletal radiologist. Evaluations were performed using a Siemens Acuson S2000 ultrasound system (Siemens Medical Solutions, Mountain view, CA, USA), and a 4–9 MHz transducer (9L4) was equipped for B-mode ultrasound and ARFI elastography examinations.

Patients were placed in the supine position and their knee at full extension while the ankles of the patients were evaluated in four different positions: plantar flexion, neutral position, and 15° and 30° dorsiflexion. To standardize the positions, a hinged angle adjustable short leg brace was used in which the Achilles region was left open (Fig. 1). Measurements were made in the musculoskeletal mode of the ultrasound device. The probe was placed parallel to the muscle fibers on the longitudinal axis, and measurements were made between 3 cm above and below the Achilles tendon repair area where the clearest and homogeneous image was obtained. The tendon diameters were measured to determine the middle part of the tendon and measurements were made at this level. No measurement was made from the areas that were artifacted by unabsorbed sutures.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Angle adjustable short leg brace with a hinge centered over the ankle to standardize the measurements. 30° plantar flexion (a) and 30° dorsiflexion (b). The patient provided written informed consent for print and electronic publication of the figures

First of all, the rectangular area was mapped by coloring according to the stiffness of the tissue in B-Mode of ARFI device. The blue color on the scale shows the softest region, while the red shows the hardest region. Radiologist recorded sections from three regions (region of interest) where it is considered to be the most homogeneous within this rectangle and the SWVs given by the program were recorded (Fig. 2). SWV value was expressed in meters per second. The range for SWV was 0–9 m/s. For each tendon, three measurements were performed. Analyses were made by taking the average of the values in the examined sections.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

B-mode ARFI image (a), ARFI elastography mapping image without any artifact indicating a homogenous area (b), and elastographic measurement (c)

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS program, version 22.0 (SPSS Inc.). Mann-Whitney U test was used to test whether the measurements in the Krackow and modified Kessler suture method groups were different. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the purpose of examining differences between the measurements of the repaired and the non-injured tendons. Standard deviation (SD) was used as a measure of variability. The results were presented with two decimal places. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Ten unilaterally operated patients underwent surgical repair with Krackow suture method, while one bilateral and eight unilaterally operated patients underwent modified Kessler suture method. The mean age of the patients included in the study was 42.10 years (range 28–56, SD ± 8.96). The mean age of the patients who underwent Krackow suture method was 37.2 years (range 28–45, SD ± 7.57), while the mean age of the patients who underwent modified Kessler suture method was 47.1 years (range 40–56, SD ± 7.67). The mean follow-up was 84.2 months (range 48–156, SD ± 14.37). The mean follow-up of the patients who underwent Krackow suture method was 82.4 months (range 48–148, SD ± 15.43), while the mean age of the patients who underwent modified Kessler suture method was 86.1 months (range 54–156, SD ± 17.22).

Achilles tendons of the patients operated with Krackow and modified Kessler methods were compared with ARFI elastography in four different positions of the ankle, and no significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1

Comparison of average SWVs of surgically repaired Achilles tendons according to the suture method by Mann-Whitney U test and associated p values

Tendon

Suture method

N

SWV ± SD (m/s)

p value

Repaired P

Krackow

10

6.48 ± 0.78

0.55

Modified Kessler

10

6.26 ± 0.62

Repaired N

Krackow

10

7.35 ± 0.70

0.42

Modified Kessler

10

7.28 ± 0.64

Repaired D 15°

Krackow

10

8.23 ± 0.58

0.39

Modified Kessler

10

8.42 ± 0.37

Repaired D 30°

Krackow

10

9.24 ± 0.46

0.43

Modified Kessler

10

9.32 ± 0.20

There was no statistically significant differences between the groups

SWV shear wave velocity, P plantar flexion, N neutral, D dorsiflexion

There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the functional results (VAS, AOFAS Ankle- Hindfoot, VISA-A) of the Krackow and modified Kessler methods (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of average functional scores of the patients according to the suture method by Mann-Whitney U test and associated p values

Questionnaire

Suture method

N

Score

SD

p value

VAS

Krackow

10

0.30

0.67

0.99

Modified Kessler

10

0.41

0.61

AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot

Krackow

10

97.13

4.32

0.87

Modified Kessler

10

96.87

4.13

VISA-A

Krackow

10

98.51

2.32

1.12

Modified Kessler

10

98.12

2.51

There was no statistically significant differences between the groups

VAS Visual Analogue Scale, AOFAS American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score, VISA-A Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment – Achilles

The scores of five subscales of FAOS were similar between the two suture method groups (p > 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparison of average FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) of the patients according to the suture method by Mann-Whitney U test and associated p values

 

Suture method

N

Score (%)

SD

p value

Pain (%)

Krackow

10

97.78

3.66

0.27

Modified Kessler

10

99.17

1.34

Symptoms (%)

Krackow

10

97.50

2.41

0.57

Modified Kessler

10

98.22

3.03

Daily activities (%)

Krackow

10

99.85

0.46

0.49

Modified Kessler

10

99.56

0.71

Sports and recreational activities (%)

Krackow

10

95.50

8.32

0.15

Modified Kessler

10

99.50

1.58

Quality of life (%)

Krackow

10

86.88

11.20

0.90

Modified Kessler

10

87.50

11.41

There were no statistically significant differences between the groups

The repaired and non-injured Achilles tendons of the patients were compared with ARFI elastography, and the measurements on the repair side were significantly higher in all four different positions of the ankle (p < 0.05) (Table 4) (Fig. 3).
Table 4

Comparison of the ARFI values of healthy and repaired tendons by Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Measurement

N

SWV ± SD (m/s)

p value

Repaired P

18

6.37 ± 0.70

0.01*

Healthy P

18

3.93 ± 0.81

Repaired N

18

7.31 ± 0.65

0.01*

Healthy N

18

5.64 ± 0.89

Repaired D 15°

18

8.32 ± 0.49

0.01*

Healthy D 15°

18

7.35 ± 0.70

Repaired D 30°

18

9.28 ± 0.35

0.01*

Healthy D 30°

18

8.48 ± 0.54

Repaired tendons had significantly higher values compared to the healthy tendons, indicating less elasticity in the repaired tendons

SWV shear wave velocity, P plantar flexion, N neutral, D dorsiflexion

*p < 0.05

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Elastographic measurements from a surgically repaired Achilles tendon (a, b)

Discussion

In this study, we found out that the repaired Achilles tendon has lower elasticity compared to the non-injured tendon, but the Krackow and modified Kessler suture methods does not have different effects on the elasticity.

In the treatment of ATR, numerous treatment approaches have been identified but there is no consensus about the gold standard treatment method. The healing process always includes fibrosis in the tendon and the surrounding area, independent from the treatment method. As a result, the increased fibrotic tissue in the healing zone increases the stiffness of the tendon [3]. This fact also supports our results which suggests that the elasticity of the repaired Achilles tendons is significantly lower than the non-injured Achilles tendons.

Although the non-operative management with functional bracing remains as one of the valuable treatment options due to the studies showing similar re-rupture rates with avoidance from possible surgical complications, the surgical repair is widely preferred especially in young patients for faster recovery and early return to the physical activities [11]. There are various techniques for the surgical repair of ATR including open, minimal invasive, and percutaneous techniques. In the literature, numerous studies exist comparing the outcomes of these techniques but it is not possible to determine a gold standard. In an in vitro study by Hockenbury and Johns on fresh-frozen cadavers, it was shown that the open repair provides two-times more strength and less risk of sural nerve entrapment compared to the percutaneous technique [12]. However, Hsu et al. did not find any significant difference between these two techniques in terms of postoperative complications in their cohort of 270 patients, while Cretnik et al. obtained less complications in the patients treated with percutaneous technique compared to the open repair group in their cohort of 237 patients [13, 14].

Bhattacharyya and Gerber claimed that the open repair has increased rate of wound complications and need for the postoperative analgesia compared to the minimal invasive technique [15]. In another comperative study by Aktas and Kocaoglu, open and minimal invasive techniques yielded similar functional outcomes while the open repair group had a higher complication rate [16]. In their meta-analysis, Del Buono et al. concluded that minimally invasive and open surgery of the Achilles tendon are grossly equivalent in terms of functional outcomes, but the recent evidence is that minimally invasive surgery results in a lower rate of complications than open surgery [17].

Several methods have been described for the repair of the Achilles tendon. Kessler, Krackow, Bosworth, Bunnell, modified Kessler, Lynn’s, and Lindholm methods are some of these described techniques in the literature [17]. Krackow and modified Kessler methods, which are the methods that had been used in this study, are two of the most commonly used end-to-end repair methods. Modified Kessler method consists of grasping loops at both medial and lateral side of the tendon ends, and the knot is tied in the repair site. Krackow method includes a series of locking loops that reinforce one another going through both medial and lateral side of the tendon ends. The knot of the suture is also tied in the repair site. Although there is no significant functional difference in the various comparative studies comparing these suture methods [46], there are also some publications that indicate that the Krackow suture method is stronger than the modified Kessler suture method biomechanically [18, 19]. However, when we look at our findings, there was no difference between the two techniques in terms of the change in the elasticity and also the functional outcomes.

In the literature, there are many studies evaluating the Achilles tendon’s structural properties after repair with the aid of both histological, biomechanical, and imaging studies, but there are quite few researches aimed at evaluating elastic properties of the tendon. The elastographic evaluation of the soft tissues is a trending topic in musculoskeletal radiology, and the Achilles tendon is one of the main interests of the researchers. Some studies have shown that elastic properties of the Achilles tendon correlates with the clinical outcomes and can be a useful tool to follow the effect of the treatment [20, 21]. Zhang et al. investigated the correlation between elasticity of the Achilles tendon and functional outcomes at 12, 24, and 48 months postoperatively in 26 patients who underwent surgical repair after ATR. They concluded that SWE can provide biomechanical information for evaluating the mechanical properties of healing Achilles tendon and predict Achilles tendon function [20]. Dirrichs et al. also found that SWE findings and clinical scores correlates strongly in patients with symptomatic tendinopathies (17 Achilles, 15 patellar, and 15 humeral-epicondylar tendons) [21].

In some elastographic studies of the Achilles tendon, it has also been showed that the elasticity of the tendon decreases by age [7, 22]. In a series of 56 healthy individuals evaluated by ARFI elastography, Ruan et al. found out that the elasticity of healthy Achilles tendon decreases with increasing age, even in subjects without disease and long-term heavy load lifting [7]. In a sonoelastographic study by Turan et al., the authors revealed an increased tendon stiffness in elderly subjects and concluded that this might be a predisposing factor for the high prevalence of Achilles tendinopathies observed in elderly subjects [22]. In our study, the mean age of the patients in the modified Kessler suture method group was significantly higher (~ 10 years) than the mean age of the patients in the Krackow suture method group. But this difference was also significantly low compared to the aforementioned studies which have groups with age differences more than 25 years. Therefore, the age difference in our groups might not have affected the results significantly.

The functional results of the patients were very good in all questionnaires including AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot, VAS, VISA-A, and all subscales of FAOS. However, “The Quality of Life” subscale of FAOS was relatively low compared to the other subscales. The anamnesis of the patients revealed that there is a sense of insecurity towards the repaired Achilles tendons, even though the patients have no clinical complaints. We think that this is the main reason behind the relatively low “The Quality of Life” score in FAOS. The less elasticity of the repaired tendon may have led to an insecurity through a natural defense mechanism to prevent re-injuries.

Our study has several limitations. The number of patients in our study was limited, and the age distribution of patient groups was not homogenous. This situation might have affected our results since the elasticity of the Achilles tendon decreases by age, according to some studies [7, 22]. Retrospective design of the study and non-standardized rehabilitation protocol also negatively affects the strength of our study. Having only male patients in the study group also restricts the generalization of our results to the entire population. However, in some studies including the Shear Wave Elastography assessments, the elasticity of the Achilles tendon was not different between men and women groups [7, 23]. Finally, our study did not include a patient group who were conservatively treated. Conducting studies which compares the elasticity of the conservatively and the surgically treated Achilles tendons may bring new information to the management of ATRs.

Despite these limitations, this study has several strengths. All clinical evaluations were performed by the same physician, and all radiologic evaluations were performed by the same radiologist which reduced the possible inter-observer variability. To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the elasticity of the repaired and the non-injured Achilles tendons and compare the results according to the suture method.

Conclusion

In our study, the repaired Achilles tendon ruptures were retrospectively evaluated by ARFI elastography and the elasticity on the repair site was found to be less compared to the non-injured side in four different positions of the ankle. At the same time, there was no significant difference between Krackow and modified Kessler methods in ARFI elastography and clinical evaluations. These results suggest that the repair method should be left to surgeon preference. The SWV values of the repaired and the non-injured tendons obtained in this study can be used as data for the future studies with ARFI elastography. More comprehensive studies investigating the help of elastography on evaluating the tissue-healing and deciding the timing of immobilization, weight-bearing, and rehabilitation can help the surgeons to have more patient-based treatment and rehabilitation approaches.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

Some of the data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this published article. The rest of the data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

YSK completed the clinical evaluations of the patients and participated in preparation of the manuscript. BK participated in preparation of the manuscript. GK, TO, OA, and HB performed the surgeries. ASD and EUE completed the radiologic evaluations. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Clinical Research Ethics Committee (07-03-2017/A-07). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Written consent to publish patient identifiable information and data was obtained.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Kocamustafapasa Cad. No:53, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
(2)
Department of Radiology, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Kocamustafapasa Cad. No: 53, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey

References

  1. Jozsa L, Kvist M, Balint BJ, Reffy A, Jarvinen M, Lehto M, et al. The role of recreational sport activity in Achilles tendon rupture. A clinical, pathoanatomical, and sociological study of 292 cases. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17:338–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Maffulli N, Ewen SWB, Waterston SW, Reaper J, Barrass V. Tenocytes from ruptured and tendinopathic Achilles tendons produce greater quantities of type III collagen than tenocytes from normal Achilles tendons. Am J Sports Med. 2000;28:499–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tavares WC, de Castro UB, Paulino E, de Souza Vasconcellos L, Madureira AP, Magalhães MAB, et al. Healing of the Achilles tendon in rabbits—evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:132.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Jessing P, Hansen E. Surgical treatment of 102 tendo achillis ruptures—suture or tenontoplasty? Acta Chir Scand. 1975;141(5):370–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cash MP, Sherrill JM, Waitayawinyu T, Hunt TR, Shack RB, Thayer WP. Evaluation of fiberloop sutures in locking and nonlocking tendon repair. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;68:583–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McCoy BW, Haddad SL. The strength of achilles tendon repair: a comparison of three suture techniques in human cadaver tendons. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:701–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ruan Z, Zhao B, Qi H, Zhang Y, Zhang F, Wu M, et al. Elasticity of healthy Achilles tendon decreases with the increase of age as determined by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:1043–50.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Shinohara M, Sabra K, Gennisson JL, Fink M, Tanter ML. Real-time visualization of muscle stiffness distribution with ultrasound shear wave imaging during muscle contraction. Muscle Nerve. 2010;42:438–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sharma P, Maffulli N. Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair. J Bone Jt Surg. 2005;87:187–202.Google Scholar
  10. Yang TH, Thoreson AR, An KN, Zhao C, Conover CA, Amadio PC. PAPP-A affects tendon structure and mechanical properties. J Struct Biol. 2015;192:59–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, Kaufman A, Glazebrook M. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:2136–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hockenbury RT, Johns JC. A biomechanical in vitro comparison of open versus percutaneous repair of tendon Achilles. Foot Ankle Int. 1990;11:67–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsu AR, Jones CP, Cohen BE, Davis WH, Ellington JK, Anderson RB. Clinical outcomes and complications of percutaneous Achilles repair system versus open technique for acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36:1279–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cretnik A, Kosanovic M, Smrkolj V. Percutaneous versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: a comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1369–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bhattacharyya M, Gerber B. Mini-invasive surgical repair of the Achilles tendon-does it reduce post-operative morbidity? Int Orthop. 2009;33:151–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Aktas S, Kocaoglu B. Open versus minimal invasive repair with Achillon device. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:391–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Del Buono A, Volpin A, Maffulli N. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2014;109:45–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Yammine K, Assi C. Efficacy of repair techniques of the Achilles tendon: a meta-analysis of human cadaveric biomechanical studies. Foot. 2017;30:13–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey L, Rockett MS. Mechanical comparison of two extensor tendon repairs of ankle tendons. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2000;39:232–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang LN, Wan WB, Wang YX, Jiao ZY, Zhang LH, Luo YK, et al. Evaluation of elastic stiffness in healing Achilles tendon after surgical repair of a tendon rupture using in vivo ultrasound shear wave elastography. Skelet Radiol. 2016;17:30–5.Google Scholar
  21. Dirrichs T, Quack V, Gatz M, Tingart M, Rath B, Betsch M, et al. Shear wave elastography (SWE) for monitoring of treatment of tendinopathies. A double-blinded, longitudinal clinical study. Acad Radiol. 2017;S1076–6332(17):30400–2.Google Scholar
  22. Turan A, Teber MA, Yakut ZI, Unlu HA, Hekimoglu B. Sonoelastographic assessment of the age-related changes of the Achilles tendon. Med Ultrason. 2015;17:58–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fu S, Cui L, He X, Sun Y. Elastic characteristics of the normal achilles tendon assessed by virtual touch imaging quantification shear wave elastography. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35:1881–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement