Open Access

Two-stage therapeutic utility of ectopically formed bone tissue in skeletal muscle induced by adeno-associated virus containing bone morphogenetic protein-4 gene

  • Ke Tian1,
  • Min Qi2,
  • Limin Wang1,
  • Zhifu Li1,
  • Jianzhong Xu1,
  • Yi Li1,
  • Guanlei Liu1,
  • Bing Wang3,
  • Johnny Huard4 and
  • Guangheng Li1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research201510:86

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0229-1

Received: 20 March 2015

Accepted: 21 May 2015

Published: 30 May 2015

Abstract

Background

The major disadvantage of using a stem cell-based bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP4) gene therapy for skull defect is the overgrowth of generated bone tissue in situ. In the present study, to overcome bony overgrowth of stem cell based-gene therapy, a new strategy of two-stage bone tissue engineering by an adeno-associated virus containing BMP4 gene (AAV-BMP4) gene therapy was used.

Methods

AAV-BMP4 was purposely implanted in the skeletal muscle of mice to generate ectopic bone tissues during the first stage. Next, the newly formed ectopic bone tissues were harvested and then transplanted to repair the mouse skull defect during the second stage.

Results

The results showed that skeletal muscle implantation of AAV-BMP4 yielded a large amount of new bone tissues. The ectopic bone tissues can be harvested as a bone graft and can successfully repair the mouse skull defect without any bony overgrowth in situ.

Conclusion

The results indicate that the bone tissues purposely generated by AAV-BMP4 in the skeletal muscle may be a new alternative of bone grafting for clinical purposes.

Keyword

Gene therapy Adeno-associated virus BMP4 Bone Skeletal muscle Skull defect

Background

Patients with clinical situations, such as skull defect, chronic non-unions of fracture, or spinal fusion may require repeated autologous bone grafts. The disadvantages of using autologous bone grafts include limited availability, donor-site morbidity, and reduced osteogenicity. Wright et al. have repaired long-bone and cranial defects by utilizing muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) transfected with bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [13]. However, this approach has its limitation because MDSCs normally generate inappropriate overgrowth of bone tissue in situ. Although Hannallah et al. reported that the inappropriate overgrowth can be prevented by multiple gene therapies, such as the combination of BMP4 and Noggin (BMP4 antagonist), the transfected cells must be tightly regulated which make the procedure difficult to manage [4, 5]. Besides, the stem cell-based gene therapy is lengthy considering the time required for stem cell isolation, in vitro transfection, and implantation of cells until ossification in the defect is observed [68].

It is known that ectopic bone tissues in the skeletal muscle can be induced by injecting adeno-associated viruses (AAV) containing the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) gene [9, 10]. However, it remains uncertain whether the bone tissue generated by the AAV-BMP4 induction can be used as a bone graft. Therefore, in the present study, a new strategy was used to overcome the disadvantages of stem cell-based gene therapy for the skull defect repair. In this strategy, ectopic bone formation in the skeletal was accomplished by the implantation of AAV-BMP4 during the first stage, and then the bone tissues were harvested and tested for its grafting capacity for skull defect repair during the second stage. Results generated from the present study provide us with a better understanding about ectopically formed bone tissues triggered by AAV-BMP4 in the skeletal muscle, which may be a new strategy for treating clinical patients with a need for bone grafts.

Methods

Construction and production of AAV-BMP4

Human BMP4 gene was carried by self-complementary AAV vectors [11]. The viral vector stocks of serotypes 6 of AAV-D(+)-BMP-4 were produced and purified according to published protocols [11], and vector titers were approximately 5 × 1012 viral particles per ml (vp/ml).

Skeletal muscle implantation of AAV-BMP4 in SCID mice

The animal protocol using severe combined immune-deficient (SCID) mice in the present study was approved by the Experimental Animal Review Board of Zhengzhou University. Twelve pieces of Gelfoam (Pfizer, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 3 × 3 mm2) soaked with 15 μl AAV-BMP4 (5 × 1012 vp/ml) were implanted into both legs of six SCID mice. These mice were assessed by micro-CT at weeks 2, 12, and 24 after implantation surgery (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1

Two-stage therapeutic utility of ectopically formed bone tissue induced by AAV-BMP4 in skeletal muscle. a Experimental design of two-stage therapeutic utility of ectopically formed bone tissue induced by AAV-BMP4 in skeletal muscle. bd H&E staining of sample sections showing that the process of endochondral bone formation was triggered by the AAV-BMP4 with Gelfoam implantation in the muscle pocket. Cartilage (c) and bone (d) tissues were observed at weeks 2 and 4 after the implantation, respectively. eg μCT assessments showed ectopic bone tissues appeared at weeks 2 (e), 12 (f), and 24 (g) after implantation. The density of ectopic bone tissues increased with time

Harvesting and transplantation of bone tissues in vivo

The mice with AAV-BMP4 implantation surgery were sacrificed and ectopically generated bone tissue in the skeletal muscle pocket was harvested at week 12. At the same time, another set of twelve host mice with skull defects were surgically created [5]. Six of the 12 mice are the recipients of these freshly harvested bone grafts and were used as the experimental group, and the other 6 mice have no treatment and were used as the control group. Harvested bone tissue was shaped and resized to fit a 6-mm-diameter skull defect and then transplanted into six host mice (Fig. 1a). The incision was sutured closed, and mice were housed as normal.

Micro-CT exams

After AAV-BMP4 implantation, mice were checked by micro-computed tomography (μCT) at weeks 2, 12, and 24 after surgery. The mice with skull defects were also checked by μCT at weeks 4, 12, and 24 after bone graft transplantation surgery.

Von Kossa/eosin staining

Frozen sections were fixed in 10 % formalin for 10 min and were rinsed in distilled water three times. The slides were stained in 2 % silver nitrate solution in the dark for 15 min, rinsed three times in distilled water, and exposed to light for 15–30 min until appropriate stain development. These sections were counterstained with eosin according to the protocol [12].

Results

Bone tissues were generated in the hind limb skeletal muscle pocket with AAV-BMP4 Gelfoam implantation in vivo

Implantation of Gelfoam containing 15 μl of AAV-BMP4 (5 × 1012 vp/ml) in the muscle pocket induced a large amount of ectopic bone tissue histologically (Fig. 1d) and was confirmed by μCT at 2 weeks post implantation (Fig. 1e).

Ectopic bone formation by implantation of AAV-BMP4 Gelfoam underwent endochondral process

Implantation of AAV-BMP4 with Gelfoam yielded a large amount of bone tissue in the skeletal muscle by both histologically and μCT measurement. The process of bone formation is through endochondral bone formation. Normal histological structure of skeletal muscle is observed prior to AAV-BMP4 with Gelfoam implantation (Fig. 1b). Noticeable cartilage tissue is observed in the tissue section at week 2 after AAV-BMP4 with Gelfoam implantation (Fig. 1c), and bone tissue has formed by week 4 (Fig. 1d). μCT assessment demonstrated ectopic bone tissue formation at weeks 2, 12, and 24 after implantation. The bone density increased with time (Fig. 1eg).

Transplanted bone graft successfully repaired the skull defect of the host mouse

The transplanted bone tissues successfully repaired the skull defect by μCT examinations at various time points after surgery. The bone graft gradually modified its dimension with time (Fig. 2a). There is no overgrowth of transplanted bone tissues at the site of the skull defect (Fig. 2b). Under μ-CT and histological examinations, the bony edge of the graft fused with the host bony skull defect effectively in time (Fig. 2c, d).
Fig. 2

Ectopic bone tissues repaired skull defect successfully. a μCT assessment showed harvested ectopic bone tissues repaired skull bone defect effectively with time. NC stands for negative control which has no graft implantation. b At week 24 after transplantation, μCT assessments showed there was no bony overgrowth of transplanted ectopic bone graft for skull defect when compared to the MDSC-based gene therapy (bi). c Transplanted bone graft fused well with the host bone edge of skull defect with time. d Histological results demonstrated that harvested bone graft fused with the host bone tissue efficiently at week 24 post transplantation by von Kossa/eosin staining of sample section

Discussions

Skeletal muscle is reported as the easiest infected organ for AAV when compared to other organs in several in vivo studies [11, 13]. In the present study AAV-BMP4 works very effectively to transform a large amount of skeletal muscles into similar amount of bone tissues in vivo. The histological observations also proved that the process underwent the endochondral bone formation.

Ideally, the new bone regeneration strategy should be simple, cost effective, and as minimally invasive as possible to lessen donor-site morbidity [1315]. In the present study, the thought of two-stage bone grafting was tested (Fig. 2a). The results demonstrated that ectopic bone tissue has good efficiency and practicality for bone grafting. As thought, the method was superior for the following reasons when compared to the traditional stem cell-based gene therapy. This method omitted a huge amount of in vitro work which included the isolation of stem cells, culturing, passage, virus transduction, and final implantation [1618]. The bone tissues generated in the muscle pocket are easily harvested and applied in the skull defect. Our results also demonstrated that harvested bone tissues repaired the skull defect without the overgrowth of bone tissues, which is a major side complication of conventional stem cell-based BMP4 gene therapy [5].

The concept of the present study was to help clinicians deal with patients with fracture non-union, bone defects, and spinal fusion. This method will enable one or several “unnecessary” pieces of skeletal muscle of patients to be transformed into the bone tissues needed for bone grafting in vivo. By saying the “unnecessary”, it means that transforming the piece of skeletal muscle into bone tissue does not affect normal body function severely. The transformed pieces of skeletal muscles could be the least used muscles or some muscles which did not affect the normal human body function after being removed, such as human palmaris longus muscle and plantaris muscle.

As we know, there are around 650 skeletal muscles in the human body and they make up around half of the total human body weight. Skeletal muscle might become a potential bony autograft bank for patients with a need for bone grafting if the concept of the present study succeeds in future human clinical trial. Future work will investigate how to control the size and orientation of ectopic bone tissue in vivo in its first stage, as well as its efficiency for the treatment of long-bone defects instead of skull defect.

Conclusion

Ectopically formed bone tissues triggered by AAV-BMP4 in the skeletal muscle can be used as bone graft for repairing the skull defect, which may be a new strategy for treating clinical orthopedic patients with a need for bone grafts.

Notes

Abbreviations

BMP4: 

bone morphogenetic protein-4

AAV: 

adeno-associated virus

MDSCs: 

muscle-derived stem cells

SCID: 

severe combined immune-deficient

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Arvydas Usas for the technical support. We are also grateful for the editorial assistance from Jennifer Peckham during the manuscript preparation. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No 81472136) to GL and in part by NIH Grant 1 R01 DE13420-01 to JH.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
(2)
Department of Geriatrics, Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University
(3)
Molecular Therapy Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
(4)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stem Cell Research Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine

References

  1. Wright V, Peng H, Usas A, Young B, Gearhart B, Cummins J, et al. BMP4-expressing muscle-derived stem cells differentiate into osteogenic lineage and improve bone healing in immunocompetent mice. Mol Ther. 2002;6(2):169–78. doi:S1525001602906544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shen HC, Peng H, Usas A, Gearhart B, Cummins J, Fu FH, et al. Ex vivo gene therapy-induced endochondral bone formation: comparison of muscle-derived stem cells and different subpopulations of primary muscle-derived cells. Bone. 2004;34(6):982–92. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2004.01.028. S8756328204000195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Shen HC, Peng H, Usas A, Gearhart B, Fu FH, Huard J. Structural and functional healing of critical-size segmental bone defects by transduced muscle-derived cells expressing BMP4. J Gene Med. 2004;6(9):984–91. doi:10.1002/jgm.588.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hannallah D, Peng H, Young B, Usas A, Gearhart B, Huard J. Retroviral delivery of Noggin inhibits the formation of heterotopic ossification induced by BMP-4, demineralized bone matrix, and trauma in an animal model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(1):80–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Peng H, Usas A, Hannallah D, Olshanski A, Cooper GM, Huard J. Noggin improves bone healing elicited by muscle stem cells expressing inducible BMP4. Mol Ther. 2005;12(2):239–46. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.02.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rose T, Peng H, Usas A, Josten C, Fu FH, Huard J. Ex-vivo gene therapy with BMP-4 for critically sized defects and enhancement of fracture healing in an osteoporotic animal model. Unfallchirurg. 2005;108(1):25–34. doi:10.1007/s00113-004-0888-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding H, Gao YS, Hu C, Wang Y, Wang CG, Yin JM, et al. HIF-1alpha transgenic bone marrow cells can promote tissue repair in cases of corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head in rabbits. PLoS One. 2013;8(5), e63628. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063628. PONE-D-12-33518.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng Y, Bi X, Zhou H, You Z, Wang Y, Gu P, et al. Repair of critical-sized bone defects with anti-miR-31-expressing bone marrow stromal stem cells and poly(glycerol sebacate) scaffolds. Eur Cell Mater. 2014;27:13–24. discussion −5. vol027a02.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Luk KD, Cheung KM, Xu R, Lin MC, Lu WW, et al. Gene therapy for new bone formation using adeno-associated viral bone morphogenetic protein-2 vectors. Gene Ther. 2003;10(16):1345–53. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301999.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Luk KD, Chen Y, Cheung KM, Kung HF, Lu WW, Leong JC. Adeno-associated virus-mediated bone morphogenetic protein-4 gene therapy for in vivo bone formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;308(3):636–45. S0006291X03014293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wang B, Li J, Fu FH, Xiao X. Systemic human minidystrophin gene transfer improves functions and life span of dystrophin and dystrophin/utrophin-deficient mice. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(4):421–6. doi:10.1002/jor.20781.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Li G, Peng H, Corsi K, Usas A, Olshanski A, Huard J. Differential effect of BMP4 on NIH/3T3 and C2C12 cells: implications for endochondral bone formation. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(9):1611–23. doi:10.1359/JBMR.050513.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu CH, Chang YH, Lin SY, Li KC, Hu YC. Recent progresses in gene delivery-based bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31(8):1695–706. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.08.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Malik A, Khan W. Stem cell therapy and tissue engineering applications for bone. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013;8(3):183–4. CSCRT-EPUB-20130107-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Oryan A, Alidadi S, Moshiri A, Maffulli N. Bone regenerative medicine: classic options, novel strategies, and future directions. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9(1):18. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-9-18.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Usas A, Ho AM, Cooper GM, Olshanski A, Peng H, Huard J. Bone regeneration mediated by BMP4-expressing muscle-derived stem cells is affected by delivery system. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(2):285–93. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0130.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Yazici C, Takahata M, Reynolds DG, Xie C, Samulski RJ, Samulski J, et al. Self-complementary AAV2.5-BMP2-coated femoral allografts mediated superior bone healing versus live autografts in mice with equivalent biomechanics to unfractured femur. Mol Ther. 2011;19(8):1416–25. doi:10.1038/mt.2010.294.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang C, Wang KZ, Qiang H, Tang YL, Li Q, Li M, et al. Angiopoiesis and bone regeneration via co-expression of the hVEGF and hBMP genes from an adeno-associated viral vector in vitro and in vivo. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2010;31(7):821–30. doi:10.1038/aps.2010.67.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Tian et al. 2015

Advertisement