Skip to main content

The role of body mass index in high- and low-velocity trauma causing knee injury associated with popliteal artery lesions

Abstract

Background

Among arterial traumas, osteoarticular traumas are particularly dangerous, and those involving the popliteal artery are associated with a high amputation rate. Despite representing a minority of arterial traumas, with an incidence that varies considerably by population and geographic location, traumatic lesions of the popliteal artery are challenging. This study aimed to verify the impact of body mass index (BMI) on arterial trauma damage and patient outcomes.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical reports of all patients with osteoarticular and vascular associated lesions treated in the emergency operating room at our institution between 1 January 2005 and 1 May 2022. Forty-one patients presented with lower limb arterial trauma (43.2%); popliteal artery lesions occurred in 11 of these patients (26.8%), who were eligible for inclusion in the study. The lesion mechanism was dislocation by high-velocity trauma in 9 patients and dislocation by low-velocity trauma in 3 patients. All 7 males (63.6%) experienced high-velocity trauma, and 2 of the 3 females experienced low-velocity trauma. Only one patient had an isolated popliteal artery lesion associated with fractures in the leg or the contralateral limb. Patients with low-velocity trauma were older than 54 years, while those with high-velocity trauma were aged 22 to 71 years.

Results

In 10/11 patients (90.9%), revascularization was performed after osteoarticular stabilization and reduction of the dislocation or fracture. Intraoperative angiography was selectively used. Two patients required above-the-knee amputation after the procedure: one due to infection of the surgical access point and the other due to severe soft tissue injury. One patient died during hospitalization due to trauma-related complications and comorbidities.

Conclusions

High-velocity trauma and low-velocity trauma in patients with a body mass index > 35 kg/m2 and knee lesions are associated with popliteal artery lesions. Revascularization success is not associated with high- or low-velocity trauma.

Background

Traumatic lesions of the popliteal artery are rare [1, 2], with an incidence rate between 5 and 19% in the civilian population [3, 4]. Because of its anatomical position in the popliteal fossa, the popliteal artery is anteriorly protected by the knee joint and is rarely affected by isolated trauma. Damage to this artery is more frequently associated with knee fractures (Gustillo IIIC) 5,6 or knee dislocation, as in Patient 7 in our study (Fig. 1) [7, 8].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient 7. Plain RX: Posterior dislocation of the knee. Note the posterior descent of the bone segment of the femur

Ligation of arterial injuries of the leg in World War II led to an amputation rate of 72% [9]; experience with arterial repair or reconstruction in the Korean War lowered the amputation rate to 32% [10]. More than a decade later, similar amputation rates were reported during the Vietnam War [11]. Although a much lower amputation rate was reported between 1990 and 2000, traumatic lesions of the popliteal artery continue to be the most common arterial lesion associated with limb loss [12, 13]. A multidisciplinary approach is key in the successful management of knee injury. Dislocation or fracture can cause a vascular lesion, which must be recognized quickly to achieve imminent repair. The osteoarticular cause must also be identified for appropriate revascularization. Surgeons should always consider the possibility of a popliteal artery lesion, even in cases of minor trauma and after reduction of a dislocation [14, 15] (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Patient 7, AngioCT scan of the lower left limb. After reduction of dislocation, an interruption of the passage of the contrast agent in the retroarticular popliteal artery was observed

Few studies have focused on the relationship between speed of the trauma and body mass. This study aimed to evaluate risk factors of trauma associated with arterial injury and verify the role of body mass in the outcome of surgical arterial revascularization.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis from a single centre. No ethical approval or relevant judgement from ethics committees was needed. Prior to beginning the writing of this article, all patients and/or family members were contacted to seek their consent for the release and processing of sensitive data for research purposes. The main inclusion criteria were traumatic lesions of the popliteal artery and age older than 18 years at the time of admission. The exclusion criteria were arterial lesions not involving the limbs and the absence of a diagnosed popliteal artery lesion (such as popliteal artery aneurysm) prior to trauma and admission to the hospital. The patients were divided into two study groups based on the dynamics of the trauma that caused the arterial lesion: high or low velocity. A high-velocity trauma was defined as an incident involving a motorized vehicle, such as motor vehicle collisions, motorcycle collisions, moped collisions, motorized vehicle collisions, or crush injuries. A low-velocity trauma was defined as that occurring secondary to a fall, sport, or assault [8, 14].

Clinical and operative data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical reports of emergency and operating rooms at Tor Vergata Hospital between 1 January 2005 and 1 May 2022. In that time, ninety-five patients were admitted to Tor Vergata Hospital with a diagnosis of arterial trauma (Table 1).

Table 1 Patients admitted and mechanism of trauma with arterial involvement

The inclusion criterion was popliteal artery injury; 42 patients presented with lower limb arterial trauma (44.2%), and of these patients, popliteal artery lesions occurred in 11 (26.8%) patients. Ten patients were eligible for inclusion in the study. The lesion mechanism was dislocation by high-velocity trauma in 9 patients and dislocation by low-velocity trauma in 2 patients. All 7 males (70%) experienced high-velocity trauma, and 2 of the 3 females experienced low-velocity trauma. Three patients had popliteal artery lesions and knee dislocation (all posterior dislocations), two of whom had a total knee prosthesis; five patients had knee fractures associated with popliteal artery trauma; and one patient had knee fracture and dislocation involving the popliteal artery. Only one patient had an isolated popliteal artery lesion associated with fractures in the leg or the contralateral limb. Patients with low-velocity trauma were older than 54 years, while those with high-velocity trauma were aged 22 to 71 years.

Statistical analysis

The data was extracted from the electronic health record system. The intended proforma was completed which included age, sex, weight as baseline demographic data. Surgical data including surgery site, year of operation, and primary patency of the arterial substitute. Postoperative early (hematoma, infection, seroma) and late (thrombosis, stenosis) complications and their management were also documented A minimum of 6 and a maximum of 24 months of follow-up was considered. After 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, the primary, primary assisted, and secondary patencies were calculated using these data.

In SPSS version 20, all the data were entered and examined. Age, associated lesions, patency, and follow-up duration are all continuous variables that were provided as mean and standard deviation. Sex, surgery site, early and late problems, and complications are categorical variables that were provided as frequency and percentages. The indications for open surgical repair and the open surgical approach and technique used were recorded and analysed. Additionally, complications after open surgery, intraoperative death, length of stay, hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and reintervention rates were assessed. Groups were compared with nonparametric statistical tests; categorical variables were compared.

Results

All patients were treated within 3 h from admission to the emergency room and within 6 h from the accident. In eight patients, revascularization was performed after osteoarticular stabilization, except for one patient in whom revascularization was performed before orthopaedic surgery due to bleeding from the artery. One patient required arterial reconstruction without subsequent collaboration with orthopaedists due to the absence of fractures or dislocations. Posterior surgical access to the knee was used in most patients with popliteal area involvement (9/11 (81,8%)) (Fig. 3), with only two patients (18.1%) requiring the medial approach.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Patient 7, intraoperative image. Posterior popliteal surgical access with popliteal artery clamping and longitudinal arteriotomy After removal of the intraluminal clot, the interruption of the tunica intima, the seat of the arterial trauma, was observed

The posterior approach was chosen to allow orthopaedists to work with a single access point, but patients with particularly complicated situations, especially posterior knee dislocations or pluriframmentary fractures, required the medial approach. During every surgery, systemic heparinization was performed, except for one haemophilic patient with an increased risk of intraoperative bleeding. Treatments were performed depending on the lesion and the availability of a great saphenous vein (GSV) of adequate calibre (at least 3 mm in diameter); where possible, end-to-end anastomosis of the popliteal artery was preferred. Four patients were treated with GSV grafts, four with end-to-end anastomosis of the popliteal artery without any grafts, and three with synthetic grafting due to an inadequate GSV calibre. Revascularization of the popliteal artery was successful in seven out of 11 patients, two of whom underwent amputation above the knee. One of the two patients was a 54-year-old obese woman (BMI = 40 kg/m2) who had rheumatoid arthritis and drug-induced osteoporosis due to corticosteroid therapy and who experienced a low-velocity trauma from falling. Her knee prosthesis was dislocated after her fall from an upright position, which injured her popliteal artery. Because of her immune dysfunction due to rheumatoid arthritis and because she was administered corticosteroid therapy, she contracted a multidrug-resistant infection of the surgical wound that made amputation necessary after 2 months of medical therapy. The second patient was a 24-year-old man who attempted suicide by falling from a height of 12 m; he underwent bilateral GSV graft revascularization and osteoarticular stabilization but ultimately required above-the-knee amputation due to extensive soft tissue injury. A third patient whose condition was worsened due to haemophilia type A died 6 months after the GSV procedure due to the extensive injuries caused by the accident. Despite prolonged antibiotic therapy, septic shock combined with traumatic soft tissue injuries resulted in the patient's death, but graft patency was maintained. All patients were intraoperatively subjected to Eco-duplex. Intraoperative angiography was performed in only one patient. The patients treated with revascularization due to popliteal artery injury are described in Table 2, which shows that there was no difference in revascularization success between high-velocity and low-velocity trauma patients due to the small number of cases reported.

Table 2 Demographic data, mechanism of injury and postoperative course of trauma

One patient died during hospitalization due to trauma-related complications and comorbidities, namely, haemophilia type A, despite maintaining graft patency. Among the complications, two patients had deep venous thromboses (6.4%), and two patients (6.4%) healed by secondary intention. Follow-up data were available for 6 of the 8 salvaged limbs over a mean 12-month period, during which patency of arterial reconstruction, vein graft, or synthetic graft was maintained in all patients. Furthermore, 1-year patency was maintained in three patients with end-to-end anastomoses, one patient with a GSV graft, and two patients with synthetic grafts (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3 Preoperative and intraoperative data
Table 4 Postoperative results and complication

Discussion

Popliteal artery traumas represent a minority of arterial traumas, likely due to their anatomical position in the popliteal fossa and posterior to the knee joint. Unless there are preexisting structural lesions (aneurysms) or genetic predispositions such as collagenopathy or Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (laxity of joint ligaments), high-velocity trauma is required to disrupt the knee joint. Although rare, cases of low-velocity trauma exist; these can cause damage to the joint and involve the popliteal artery. This is dangerous because the low velocity of trauma associated with a large weight can be equally dangerous, and signs and symptoms may be inconsistent; typical signs of arterial injury are absent in up to 40% of patients, where the presence of a pulse in the affected limb does not exclude an arterial lesion and segmental Doppler may not detect the injury [16,17,18,19]. This type of injury does not depend only on the trauma dynamic (as with high-velocity traumas) but also on the patient’s risk factors. According to the literature, the keys for effective revascularization are systemic heparinization [20,21,22], revascularization time between 5 and 8 h after trauma, and end-to-end anastomosis instead of using a GSV graft or synthetic graft. Wherever possible, we preferred end-to-end anastomosis over GSV grafting because anastomosis is associated with a higher success rate [13]. Furthermore, several authors have suggested that fibromuscular tethering of the artery in the popliteal fossa precludes tension-free anastomosis unless potentially critical perigeniculate collaterals are divided. Therefore, interposition or bypass grafting is advocated in these cases [20, 23, 24]. The extension of soft tissue injuries is crucial for adequate and successful revascularization and explain why amputation rates due to arterial injury from secondary blunt trauma are twice as great as those due to injury from penetrating trauma [25]. Patients affected by low-velocity trauma had a BMI greater than 35 kg/m2, while patients affected by high-velocity trauma had a BMI between 18.7 and 31.5 kg/m2. The advanced age of patients affected by low-velocity trauma could represent a predisposing factor with regard to diseases associated with ageing, such as osteoporosis, arthrosis, and ligamentous laxity, rendering them prone to fractures or dislocations, including of the knee joint, as body weight represents a strong risk factor for low-velocity trauma fractures and dislocations [8, 14, 26]. Three of our patients had knee prosthesis dislocation, a rare but possible cause of popliteal artery injury, especially posterior dislocation; under these conditions, the disruption of ligaments was also described by Bonnevialle et al. in concomitant palsy of the common peroneal nerve [27, 28]. Our findings that there was no correlation between the dynamics of the trauma and the success of revascularization are consistent with those in the literature. This study has several limitations. The first limitation was the small number of patients since our institution is not a trauma centre, and popliteal artery trauma has a low incidence. Furthermore, according to the literature reviews, there is no single definition of low- or high-velocity trauma. Therefore, different articles may have different results depending on their interpretations. Finally, as the patients in this study were from a specific population, the findings about mass/velocity data cannot be extrapolated to the general population. Statistically significant conclusions can be drawn only after additional data are collected. However, the correlation found in this study remains suggestive and can be explored in more depth in further studies.

Conclusion

Lesions of the popliteal artery following low-velocity trauma are correlated with a high BMI > 35 kg/m2 and must be considered in orthopaedic evaluation. In addition, trauma dynamics (low- or high-velocity) do not influence the success of revascularization. Instead, factors that influence the results include the revascularization procedure occurring between 6 and 8 h after the accident, intraoperative systemic heparinization, and an appropriate technique for revascularization and extension of soft tissue injuries. There may be an association between age and susceptibility to arterial low-velocity trauma; however, many additional risk factors should be analysed, and a greater number of cases are needed. Further in-depth studies should be conducted to support this association.

Availability of data and materials

All clinical and operative data were available in the electronic medical reports of the emergency and operating rooms at our institution.

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

GSV:

Great saphenous vein

References

  1. Sher MH. Principles in the management of arterial injuries associated with fracture/dislocations. Ann Surg. 1975;182(5):630–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alberty RE, Goodfried G, Boyden AM. Popliteal artery injury with fractural dislocation of the knee. Am J Surg. 1981;142(1):36–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Koivunen D, Nichols WK, Silver D. Vascular trauma in a rural population. Surgery. 1982;91(6):723–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reynolds RR, McDowell HA, Diethelm AG. The surgical treatment of arterial injuries in the civilian population. Ann Surg. 1979;189(6):700–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bassett FH III, Silver D. Arterial Injury Associated With Fractures. JAMA Surg. 1966;92(1):13–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Snyder WH. Popliteal and shank arterial injury. Surg Clin North Am. 1988;68(4):787–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel C, Wascher M. High-velocity knee dislocation with Treatment Principles. Clin Sports Med. 2000;19(3):457–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaidya R, Roth M, Nanavati D, Prince M, Sethi A. Low-velocity knee dislocations in obese and morbidly obese patients. Orthop J Sport Med. 2015;3(4):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DeBakey MESF. Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II. 1946;123:534.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes CW. Arterial repair during the Korean war. Ann Surg. 1958;147(4):555–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW. Popliteal artery injuries in Vietnam. Am J Surg. 1969;118(4):531–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kauvar DS, Sarfati MR, Kraiss LW. National trauma databank analysis of mortality and limb loss in isolated lower extremity vascular trauma. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(6):1598–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner WH, Calkins ER, Weaver FA, Goodwin JA, Myles RA, Yellin AE. Blunt popliteal artery trauma: One hundred consecutive injuries. J Vasc Surg. 1988;7(5):736–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coleman JJ, Tavoosi S, Zarzaur BL, Brewer BL, Rozycki GS, Feliciano DV. Arterial injuries associated with blunt fractures in the lower extremity. Am Surg. 2016;82(9):820–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Martin MJ, Perez-Alonso AJ, Asensio JA. Vascular complications and special problems in vascular trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;39(6):569–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stuebing E, Lieberman H, Vu T, et al. Shank vessel injuries: The forgotten vascular injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012;38(4):393–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-012-0196-811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith RF, Szilagyi DE, Elliott JP. Fracture of Long Bones with Arterial Injury Due to Blunt Trauma: Principles of Management. Arch Surg. 1969;99(3):315–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bishara RA, Pasch AR, Lim LT, et al. Improved results in the treatment of civilian vascular injuries associated with fractures and dislocations. J Vasc Surg. 1986;3(5):707–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0741-5214(86)90033-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones RE, Smith EC, Bone GE. Vascular and orthopedic complications of knee dislocation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;149(4):554–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leonardo TL, Maryanne SM, Preston FD, Arsen PM. Popliteal Artery Trauma 31 Consecutive Cases Without Amputation. JAMA Surg. 1980;115(11):1307–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Michael ED, Charles RS, Calvin BEM. Using Anticoagulation and Extra-anatomic Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 1970;113(11):1317–21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Snyder WH. Vascular injuries near the knee: An updated series and overview of the problem. Surgery. 1982;91(5):502–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. O’Donnell TF, Brewster DC, Darling RC, Veen HW. Arterial injuries associated with fractures and/or dislocations of the knee. J Trauma. 1977;17(775):83.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shah DM, Naraynsingh V, Leather RP, Corson JDK. Adances-in-the-Management-of-Acute-Popliteal-vascular-Blunt-Injuries.pdf. J trauma. 1985;25(793):7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Andersen CA, Starnes BW, Salim A, Martin MJ. Limb salvage and outcomes among patients with traumatic popliteal vascular injury: an analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44(1):94–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Azar FM, Brandt JC, Miller RH, Phillips BB. Ultra-low-velocity knee dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2170–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonnevialle P, Chaufour X, Loustau O, Mansat P, Pidhorz L, Mansat M. Traumatic knee dislocation with popliteal vascular disruption: retrospective study of 14 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006;92(8):768–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ascoli Marchetti A, Potenza V, Battistini M, Morelli M, Barbante M, Benedetti VM. Dislocation of the knee and popliteal artery trauma: our experience and literature review November 2012 Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012;13:99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Vito Potenza.

Funding

The authors declare that no funding was provided for the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AAM: literature search, study design, data analysis, data interpretation, writing, critical revision. VN: literature search, data collection, writing. FMO: data analysis, data interpretation, writing, critical revision.  VP: data analysis, data interpretation, writing, critical revision. PF: data interpretation, writing, critical revision. FDM: data interpretation, writing, critical revision. AI: data interpretation, writing, critical revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Ascoli Marchetti.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This was a retrospective analysis from a single centre. No ethical approval or relevant judgement from ethics committees was required at our institution. All patients and/or family members provided consent for the release and processing of sensitive data for research purposes.

Consent for publication

All patients provided consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ascoli Marchetti, A., Naldi, V., Potenza, V. et al. The role of body mass index in high- and low-velocity trauma causing knee injury associated with popliteal artery lesions. J Orthop Surg Res 19, 347 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04821-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04821-w

Keywordspre