Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

Fig. 4

From: Biomechanical and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed versus modular hemipelvic prostheses for limb-salvage reconstruction following periacetabular tumor resection: a mid-term retrospective cohort study

Fig. 4

Biomechanical differences in pelvic ring reconstruction after Type II + III resection: Comparing different reconstruction methods using 3D-printed hemipelvic prostheses (a) and modular hemipelvic prostheses (b) in four common physiological postures, the 3D-printed prosthetic reconstruction exhibits a more uniform and gradual stress and displacement distribution. Conversely, the modular prosthetic reconstruction shows significant stress concentration at the pubic symphysis region

Back to article page