Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Decreased expression of GEM in osteoarthritis cartilage regulates chondrogenic differentiation via Wnt/β-catenin signaling

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 18, Article number: 751 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

GEM (GTP-binding protein overexpressed in skeletal muscle) is one of the atypical small GTPase subfamily members recently identified as a regulator of cell differentiation. Abnormal chondrogenesis coupled with an imbalance in the turnover of cartilaginous matrix formation is highly relevant to the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (OA). However, how GEM regulates chondrogenic differentiation remains unexplored.

Methods

Cartilage tissues were obtained from OA patients and graded according to the ORASI and ICRS grading systems. The expression alteration of GEM was detected in the Grade 4 cartilage compared to Grade 0 and verified in OA mimic culture systems. Next, to investigate the specific function of GEM during these processes, we generated a Gem knockdown (Gem-Kd) system by transfecting siRNA targeting Gem into ATDC5 cells. Acan, Col2a1, Sox9, and Wnt target genes of Gem-Kd ATDC5 cells were detected during induction. The transcriptomic sequencing analysis was performed to investigate the mechanism of GEM regulation. Wnt signaling pathways were verified by real-time PCR and immunoblot analysis. Finally, a rescue model generated by treating Gem-KD ATDC5 cells with a Wnt signaling agonist was established to validate the mechanism identified by RNA sequencing analysis.

Results

A decreased expression of GEM in OA patients’ cartilage tissues and OA mimic chondrocytes was observed. While during chondrogenesis differentiation and cartilage matrix formation, the expression of GEM was increased. Gem silencing suppressed chondrogenic differentiation and the expressions of Acan, Col2a1, and Sox9. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that Wnt signaling was downregulated in Gem-Kd cells. Decreased expression of Wnt signaling associated genes and the total β-CATENIN in the nucleus and cytoplasm were observed. The exogenous Wnt activation exhibited reversed effect on Gem loss-of-function cells.

Conclusion

These findings collectively validated that GEM functions as a novel regulator mediating chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation through Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) affects over 300 million population worldwide [1], which causes physical disability, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality among the elderly [2]. Reduced articular cartilage and dysfunction of cartilage reformation are key changes in the pathogenesis and progression of OA [3]. Chondrogenic differentiation and the formation of the extracellular matrix, contributing to the formation of a healthy microenvironment in articular cartilage, are suppressed in OA [4,5,6]. However, the mechanism underlying the dysfunction of cartilage regeneration in OA has not been fully explained [1, 7]. In a previous investigation, among the differentially expressed genes of knee articular chondrocytes between OA and normal donors, GEM was found to be expressed significantly less in the chondrocytes of OA donors.

GEM, also known as GTP-binding protein overexpressed in skeletal muscle, belonged to the RGK subfamily of small GTP-binding proteins [8]. The RGK subfamily of small GTP-binding proteins consist of four members, REM, REM2, RAD, and GEM [9], that function as powerful inhibitors of voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs) and active regulators of actin cytoskeletal dynamics [10, 11]. As integral components of signal transduction cascades, the RGK family contributes to almost every aspect of cellular physiology [11]. Furthermore, it was observed to inhibit the expression of connective tissue growth factor in cardiomyocytes by binding to CCAA T-enhancer binding protein-δ (C/EBP-δ) to regulate extracellular matrix (ECM) production [12]. ECM-rich cartilage tissue is produced solely by chondrocytes, which produce large amounts of ECM molecules during development [13]. GEM contains a G3 GTP-binding motif, extensive amino- and carboxyl-terminal extensions outside the Ras-related domains, and a motif responsible for membrane association [14]. As a result of its conservation, the carboxyl terminus plays an important role in subcellular distribution and protein–protein interaction to control both Ca2+ channel activity and cytoskeletal reorganization [11]. Previous studies have reported that multiple biological functions are carried out by GEM protein, including forming the plasma membrane’s inner face, receptor-mediated signaling, the pathogenesis of glaucoma [15], and synapse development [16]. Hence, GEM may be involved in the development of chondrocyte. Recently, RGK proteins have also been discovered to play a role in regulating cell differentiation [17]. However, there are few studies regarding the effects of GEM on chondrogenic differentiation.

The present study showed a lower level of GEM in the articular cartilage of OA patients. Consistently, cells treated with tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) to model OA also exhibited decreased expression of GEM. We also found that the GEM expression level was elevated during chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation. Thus, knocking down the expression of Gem results in suppression of chondrogenic differentiation. Moreover, bulk RNA sequencing analysis revealed that the mechanism mediating chondrogenic differentiation by Gem was associated with Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Wnt signaling activation reverses the suppression of chondrogenic differentiation in Gem knockdown cells. According to these findings, an innovative cartilage matrix formation regulator,Gem, controls the chondrogenic differentiation through Wnt/β-catenin mechanisms to maintain healthy articular cartilage.

Methods

Human tissue preparation

Human tissues of femoral and tibial articular cartilage were obtained from nine OA patients (6 females [age: 61.3 ± 3.0 years] and 3 males [age: 63.7 ± 1.2 years]) undergoing total knee arthroplasty at NanFang Hospital. Unilateral articular cartilage was artificially divided into six regions and graded according to the OARSI and ICRS grading systems (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A, B). The cartilage of Grade 0 and Grade 4 was isolated for the following experiments. This study was reviewed by the Ethics Committee of Southern Medical University NanFang Hospital (ref. NFEC-2020–166). Donors gave their informed consent to have their anonymized tissues used for scientific research purposes.

Paraffin sections

All cartilage samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution at 4 °C for 24 h. These fixed tissues were subjected to decalcification in 0.5 M EDTA for 16 weeks before dehydration, paraffin embedding, and serial sectioning. Paraffin sections with a thickness of 5 μm were acquired for subsequent staining.

Safranin O staining and immunofluorescent staining

Safranin O staining was performed using a commercial staining kit (Solarbio) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The OARSI grading system was used to evaluate the sections [18]. For immunofluorescence (IF) staining, prepared sections were incubated with anti-MMP13 (1:100 dilution, SantaCruz Biotechnology) and anti-GEM(1:100 dilution, SantaCruz Biotechnology) primary antibodies. Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated antibodies (Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. All samples were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Abcam). A BX63 confocal microscope (Olympus) was used to perform imaging. Images were quantified by ImageJ software (NIH).

Cell lineage culture

C28/I2(Cat#: bio-133595) and ATDC5(Cat#: bio-105955) cell lineages were purchased from ATCC company. Cells were cultured in monolayer in growth media (DMEM/F12 (Gibco) with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (P/S, Gibco)) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C for expansion. Cells meet a confluence of 80% to 90% were trypsinized for passage culture or subsequential experiments.

Mouse primary chondrocyte isolation and culture

On postnatal day 5 of C57BL/6 mice, articular chondrocytes were isolated from cartilage tissue for primary cultures. The knee joint area connecting the femur and tibia was chopped and digested with 1%pronase (10165921001, Roche) for 1 h and 1%collagenase (C6885-5G, Sigma-Aldrich) in DMEM for 3 h at 37 °C. The digested solution was filtered through a 40-mm cell strainer, and only cells that passed through were collected. The cells were washed with DMEM with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin. Next, the chondrocytes were suspended and seeded into 25 cm2 flasks with DMEM/F12 (10% FBS, 1% penicillin/streptomycin) at 37° C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2. These cells were considered passage 0 (P0).

Micromass culture and induction

For micromass culture, ATDC5 or C28/I2 cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco) with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (P/S, Gibco). Cells were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cultured ATDC5 chondrocytes were harvested using 0.25% trypsin–EDTA (Gibco). One droplet (20 μl) containing ATDC5 cell suspension (1 × 107 cells/ml) was carefully placed in the center of each well of a 24-well plate (ABC biochemistry). After cell attachment for 3 h, 500 μl of aMEM containing 100 nM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), 100 μM ascorbate-2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), and human transforming growth factor–b1 (10 μg/ml; Gibco) was added. At 3, 7, 14, and 21 days of differentiation, total RNA was extracted or micromass samples were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA).

TBHP treatment

To mimic OA pathogenic alteration in vitro, we incubated C28/I2 cells, ATDC5 cells, and mouse primary chondrocytes with TBHP (Macklin). Chondrocytes were seeded at a density of 3 × 104 cells/well into 24-well plates, and grown to a confluence of 90%.Then 0,200,400 uM TBHP was added into the test wells and DMEM medium added into the control wells, each with three replication wells, followed by incubation for 24 h. At 4 h and 24 h of treatment, total RNA was extracted and toluidine blue staining was performed.

CCK‑8 assay

Chondrocytes (5 × 103 cells/well) were seeded into 96-well plates and cultured at 37 °C for 24 h. After the chondrocytes were stimulated with TBHP (Macklin) for 4 h and 24 h, the medium was removed. Then, 10 µL of CCK-8 (Dojindo) solution was added to each well and incubated for another 2 h at 37 °C. Finally, absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader.

Alcian blue staining

ATDC5 micromasses were washed with PBS and fixed with ice-cold methanol for 30 min at 4 °C. Micromasses were then incubated in Alcian Blue (AB) (0.1% AB 8GX, Sigma) for a day. Stained micromasses were washed with distilled water three times and air-dried. Micromasses were imaged with an IX73 microscope (Olympus).

Toluidine blue staining

C28/I2 micromasses were washed with PBS and fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 min at room temperature. Prepare the toluidine blue solution comprising 2 g of toluidine blue crystals (Sigma) and 100 ml distilled water. Micromasses were then incubated in toluidine blue for 30 min at room temperature. Stained micromasses were washed with distilled water three times and air-dried. Micromasses were imaged with an IX73 microscope (Olympus).

In vitro gene silencing

Small interfering RNAs targeting Gem (si-Gem, siBDM1999A) were obtained from RiboBio. One droplet (20 μl) containing ATDC5 cell suspension (1 × 107 cells/ml) was carefully placed in the center of each well of a 24-well plate (ABC biochemistry). Cell transfection was performed using Lipofectamine™ 3000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Knock-down efficiency was assessed by quantitative RT-PCR. At 3, 7, 14 and 21 days of differentiation, total RNA was extracted or micromass samples were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA).

Wnt/β-catenin agonist treatment

The Control and Gemk/k ATDC5 micromasses were gently seeded in the center of each well of 24-well plates (ABC biochemistry) and treated with 0.01 μM exogenous WAY-262611(a Wnt/β-catenin agonist, Selleckchem). DMSO treatment was used as control. ATDC5 cells were therefore divided into 4 groups, including control (negative siRNA treated) + DMSO group, control + WAY group, Gemk/k + DMSO group, and Gemk/k + WAY group. Total RNA was extracted 7 and 14 days after chondrogenesis induction.

RNA-seq and bioinformatics analysis

At day 21 of chondrogenesis induction, total RNA from negative siRNA treated (Control) and si-Gem treated (Gem-Kd) ATDC5 cells was extracted by SteadyPure Quick RNA Extraction Kit(Accurate Biology) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA was sent to a qualified facility for library construction. High-throughput sequencing was performed using the Illumina Novaseq 6000 (USA). The RNA-seq reads were aligned to the mouse genome (GRCm39, http://asia.ensembl.org/Mus_musculus/Info/Index) using HISAT2. StringTie was subsequently used to count reads in features [19]. Genes with low counts (< 10 in all conditions) were filtered from downstream analyses using DESeq2, in R. Count data after regularized logarithm (rlog) transformation was used for PCA analysis and plotting [20]. Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) procedure was used to correct for multiple testing. Genes with FDR < 0.05 and fold change > 2 were identified as significantly differentially expressed genes (DEG) between conditions using the DESeq2 analysis of two RNA-seq biological replicates. Volcano plot was generated by ggplot2 package in R. Heatmaps were generated by the pheatmap package in R. Pathway analysis was performed using KEGG by clusterProfiler [21, 22], input with the genes that were more highly expressed in Control group than Gem-Kd ATDC5 cells (> twofold, FDR < 0.05). Enriched pathways were ranked based on the adjust p-value calculated by the software. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using GSEA software (version 4.3.2) following the manufacturer’s instructions, input with normalized count matrix generated by the BiocGenerics package in R [23,24,25].

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from articular chondrocytes or micromasses using TRIzol Reagent (Ambion). Complementary DNA was synthesized using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses were carried out as described using Maxima SYBRgreen qPCR master mix system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All primers used are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2(−∆∆Ct) method. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Immunoblot analysis

The nuclear proteins were isolated using a Nuclear Extraction kit (Solarbio). Proteins (10 μg) were separated with 8–12% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Beyotime). Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies specific to β-CATENIN, COL2A1, GAPDH, and LAMINB (1:1000 dilution, Beyotime). After washing with TBST (Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20) thrice, the blots were incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature. Blotting signals were detected using Near-infrared Imaging System (Odyssey).

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise specified, group comparisons were performed using t test when two groups were compared, and one-way ANOVA when three or more groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed by using the GraphPad Prism version8.2.1 or R. All bar graphs represent mean ± SEM. All p-value were denoted as * for p < 0.05, ** for p < 0.01, *** for p < 0.001, **** for p < 0.0001. The value of p < 0.05 was deemed significant.

Results

Decreased expression of GEM in OA cartilage tissues and the OA mimic cell model

To verify the expression of GEM in OA cartilage, we obtained knee articular cartilage tissues from nine OA patients undergoing TKA surgery. Unilateral articular cartilage was artificially divided into six regions and graded according to the OARSI and ICRS grading systems (Additional file 1: Figure S1A, B). The cartilage tissue of Grade 4 (OA) was used to compared with that of Grade 0 (normal). The OA group showed reduced staining of Safranin O and severe cartilage destruction in contrast to the normal group (Fig. 1A). Consistently, the Mankin score of the OA group was significantly higher (Additional file 1: Figure S1C). Immunofluorescence staining results showed that in contrast to the normal group, MMP13 levels were significantly higher and GEM levels were lower in the OA group (Fig. 1A, Additional file 1: Figure S1D, E). The expression of GEM was also decreased in OA cartilage (Fig. 1B). The expressions of other members of RGK family such as RRAD and REM exhibited no significant difference (Additional file 1: Figure S1F). To mimic OA pathogenic alteration in vitro, we incubated C28/I2 cells, ATDC5 cells and mouse primary chondrocytes with TBHP for 24 h. The CCK-8 assay illustrated that TBHP was cytotoxic to chondrocytes, with a time-dependent decline in cell viability (Additional file 1: Figure S1G). In addition, toluidine blue staining revealed that the extracellular matrix was decreased in TBHP-treated C28/I2 cells (Fig. 1C). The expressions of GEM were significantly decreased overtime in TBHP-treated C28/I2 cells, ATDC5 cells, and mouse primary chondrocytes (Fig. 1D). Altogether, these results showed significantly lower expression of GEM in OA chondrocytes.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Decreased expression of GEM in OA cartilage tissues and OA mimic cell model. A Representative images of safranin O staining and immunofluorescence staining of GEM and MMP13 in Grade 4 and Grade 0 human knee articular cartilage tissues (n = 9). B The expression levels of GEM were quantified by real-time PCR in Grade 4 and Grade 0 cartilage tissues. C Toluidine blue staining indicating extracellular matrix degradation of C28/I2 cells treated with TBHP. D The expressions of GEM of C28/I2 cells, ATDC5 cells, and primary mouse chondrocytes at 0, 4, and 24 h after treated with TBHP. All experiments were repeated for three times. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001

Full size image

Elevated expression of GEM during chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation

To reveal the physiological function of GEM on cartilage, we established a chondrogenic differentiation model using ATDC5 cell lineages and a cartilage matrix formation model using C28/I2 cell lineages and mouse primary chondrocytes at micromass culture. By staining with Safranin O and detecting the expressions of chondrogenic markers such as ACAN, COL2A1, and SOX9, we verified the chondrogenic differentiation (Fig. 2A, C, E, G). The expressions of GEM were increased on Days 3, 14, and 21 (Fig. 2B, D, F) suggesting an elevated expression of GEM during chondrogenic differentiation. Together with the decreased GEM expressions found in the OA chondrocytes, these findings uncovered that GEM was strongly associating with cartilage pathological changes in OA.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Elevated expression of GEM during chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation. A Safranin O staining of C28/I2 at micromass 14 days after induction. Red color represents as positive staining. B, D, F The mRNA expressions of GEM among C28/I2 cells (B), ATDC5 cells (D), and mouse primary chondrocytes (F) 3, 14, and 21 days after induction. C, E, G The mRNA expressions of chondrogenic markers including ACAN, COL2A1, and SOX9 among C28/I2 cells (C), ATDC5 cells (E) and mouse primary chondrocytes (G) 3, 14, and 21 days after induction. All experiments were repeated for three times. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001

Full size image

Gem silencing suppresses chondrogenesis and cartilage matrix formation

Gem loss-of-function model was established by transfecting siRNA targeting Gem into ATDC5 cells (Gem-Kd or Gemk/k). The silencing RNA with highest knockdown efficiency was screened priorly (Additional file 1: Figure S2A). Cells transfected with negative control siRNA were considered as control in the subsequential Gem silencing experiments. During chondrogenic differentiation, the expressions of Gem were decreased over time (Fig. 3A). Consistently, Gem-Kd micromasses were stained with less alcian blue (Fig. 3B, Additional file 1: S2B). The expressions of Col2a1, Sox9, and Acan exhibited similar trend as that of Gem in Gem-Kd cells, revealing significant decrease (Fig. 3C). Collectively, these results indicated that Gem silencing resulted in suppression of chondrogenesis and cartilage matrix formation in ATDC5 cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

GEM silencing suppressed chondrogenesis and cartilage matrix formation. A The mRNA expression of Gem in control ATDC5 cells transfected with negative control siRNA (Control) and siRNA targeting Gem (Gem-Kd) 3, 14, and 21 days after chondrogenic induction. B Alcian Blue staining of Control and Gem-Kd cells 7 and 14 days after chondrogenic induction. C The mRNA expressions of chondrogenic markers including Acan, Col2a1, and Sox9 among Control and Gem-Kd cells 3, 14, and 21 days after chondrogenic induction measured by real-time PCR. All experiments were repeated for three times. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.001

Full size image

Association between GEM knockdown and Wnt signaling during chondrogenic differentiation

To investigate the mechanisms underlying the regulatory role of the Gem during chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation, we performed transcriptome RNA sequencing analysis using control (negative siRNA treated) and Gem-Kd ATDC5 cells after 21 days of chondrogenic induction. The principal component analysis (PCA) showed that transcriptomic profiles of control and Gem-Kd samples were well separated (Fig. 4A). Normalized counts of the Gem gene were significantly lower in the Gem-Kd group (Fig. 4B). According to gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), genes correlated with chondrocyte differentiation were downregulated in Gem-Kd cells (Fig. 4C). The heatmap indicated that the scaled expression levels of selected chondrocyte differentiation-related genes were lower in the 3 replicate groups of Gem-Kd cells (Fig. 4D). Thus, the RNA sequencing data exhibited consistent results with the real-time PCR and safranin O staining described previously. Genes with a fold change > 2 and an FDR < 0.05 were considered differentially expressed genes (DEGs). A total of 990 genes were upregulated in Control cells, and 293 were upregulated in Gem-Kd cells (Fig. 4E). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis was performed using the DEGs upregulated in Control cells. We found that the Wnt signaling pathway was one of the top 5 enriched pathways (Fig. 4F). These DEGs were marked in red color in the Wnt signaling pathway schematic diagram generated by KEGG browser, revealing the expressions of canonical Wnt ligands, receptors like Frizzled, and direct target like Axin were decreased in Gem-Kd cells (Additional file 1: Figure S3). These findings suggested that Wnt signaling was suppressed in Gem-Kd cells during chondrogenic differentiation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Association between GEM knockdown and Wnt signaling during chondrogenic differentiation. A Principal component analysis (PCA) of the transcriptomes of Control and Gem-Kd samples (n = 3 per group). B Normalized counts of Gem in Gem-Kd samples compared to Control samples. p value = 0.0037. C Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from Control and Gem-Kd cells ranked by NES scores. D Scaled expression levels of selected chondrocyte differentiation-related genes were showed by heatmap. E Volcano plot of RNA-seq analysis of DEGs using the mRNAs isolated from the Control and Gem-Kd cells. Blue dots show genes more highly expressed in Control cells than Gem-Kd cells with significant (FDR < 0.05) and greater than twofold changes. Red dots show genes more highly expressed in Gem-Kd cells than Control cells with significant (FDR < 0.05) and greater than twofold changes. F KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs upregulated Control cells

Full size image

Reversion effects Wnt activation during chondrogenesis in Gem-KD cells

To verify the RNA sequencing results, real-time PCR was utilized to detect the expressions of multiple associated genes of Wnt signaling in Gem-Kd cells 3 and 21 days after chondrogenic induction (Fig. 5A). We found that the expressions of Axin2, Lef-1, and Tcf-7 were decreased in Gem-Kd cells compared to controls both 3 and 21 days after induction. Protein of cytoplasm and nucleus extracted from Gem-Kd cells showed lower β-CATENIN level (Fig. 5B, C, Additional file 1: Figure S4A–D). These results validated the findings uncovered by RNA sequencing analysis. In addition, we performed qPCR to investigate the WNT and relative genes in Grade 0 (normal) and Grade 4 (OA) samples. We found that the expressions of multiple associated genes of Wnt signaling were decreased in OA cartilage compared to controls (Fig. 5D). Moreover, we tried to stimulate Gem-Kd cells with exogenous Wnt ligands (WAY) to reverse the suppression of Wnt signaling. In parallel, Control cells (NC) and Gem-Kd cells were treated with DMSO or WAY. The expressions of Gem were upregulated in WAY treated groups 7 and 14 days after induction (Fig. 5E). The expressions of Axin2, Lef-1, and Tcf-7 were also significantly increased in WAY treated cells (Fig. 5H), suggesting successful reversion of the activity of Wnt signaling in Gem-Kd cells by WAY. The mRNA expressions of chondrogenic markers such as Col2a1 and SOX9 were increased in WAY treated cells compared to DMSO treated cells (Fig. 5I). We also found that the protein expression of COL2A1 was increased in WAY treated cells compared to DMSO treated cells (Fig. 5F–G), which was consistent with those obtained by qPCR. Taken together, these findings suggested that loss of function of Gem suppressed chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation by downregulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Wnt activation reverses the effects of Gem silence on chondrogenesis. A The mRNA expression of multiple genes involved in Wnt signaling in Gem-Kd cells compared to Control cells 3 days and 21 days after chondrogenic induction. B Immunoblot of β-CATENIN in nucleus and cytoplasm in the Gem-Kd cells compared to the Control cells. C Quantitative analysis of Immunoblot. D The mRNA expressions of WNT and relative genes in Grade 0(normal) and Grade 4 (OA) samples. E The mRNA expression of Gem among Control and Gem-Kd ATDC5 cells 7 and 14 days after treated with Wnt agonist (WAY). F Immunoblot of COL2A1 among Control and Gem-Kd ATDC5 cells 7 days after treated with Wnt agonist (WAY). G Quantitative analysis of Immunoblot. H The mRNA expressions of Axin2, Lef-1, and Tcf-7 among Control and Gem-Kd ATDC5 cells 7 and 14 days after treated with Wnt agonist (WAY). I The expressions of chondrogenic markers Acan, Sox9, and Col2a1 among Control and Gem-Kd ATDC5 cells 7 and 14 days after treated with Wnt agonist (WAY). All experiments were repeated at least for three times. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

OA is a highly prevalent chronic disorder of joints [26] characterized by progressive breakdown of the extracellular matrix and accelerated loss of articular cartilage [27]. A number of factors contribute to osteoarthritis cartilage destruction, including abnormal biomechanics, injuries, overloads, and instability, resulting in an imbalance between anabolic and catabolic factors in cartilage [28, 29]. In previous research, we successfully constructed materials to promote cartilage repair [30]. However, the cartilage tissue induced by this recovery was of different structure compared to the natural cartilage tissue. To date, there is no clinical proof treatment to reverse cartilage loss in OA [31]. The formation of cartilage tissue includes two processes: differentiation of chondrocytes and formation of extracellular matrix by mature chondrocytes [32]. Although multiple genes have been identified as regulators during chondrogenesis, more mechanisms underlying this process in OA conditions still urgent further studies.

Our study found decreased expression of GEM in OA patients’ cartilage tissues and TBHP-treated ATDC5 cells, identifying GEM as a potentially protective factor in OA amelioration. We also treated the C28/I2 cell line and mouse primary chondrocytes with TBHP approaches to mimic OA pathogenic alteration and observed consistent results. Next, we found that GEM silencing suppressed chondrogenic differentiation with downregulated expression of chondrogenesis and cartilage matrix formation markers in ATDC5 cells. Furthermore, we utilized RNA sequencing to identify the potential mechanism underlying the regulatory effect of Gem on chondrogenic differentiation. We found that canonical Wnt signaling might contribute to the detrimental effects of GEM loss on cartilage differentiation. We verified this finding by reversing the suppression of Wnt signaling by exogenous Wnt activation. Therefore, these results collectively validated that GEM functions as a novel regulator mediating chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation through the canonical Wnt signaling pathway.

A growing number of studies indicate that GEM participates in multiple biological functions. There are different structural sites in the GEM protein as a member of the RGK family [33]. It has been reported that GEM is involved in rearrangement of the cytoskeleton, which is mediated by ROK7 [34]. Anastassia et al. found that GEM protein interacted with the membrane–cytoskeleton linker protein ezrin in its active state and induced cell elongation [35]. Moreover, we now report that GEM plays a crucial role in regulating the differentiation of chondrocytes and matrix formation. Another member of the RGK family, RAD, has also been shown to be required for normal bone homeostasis in mice, and deletion of RAD in mice results in low bone density [36]. In this study, we found that GEM may be necessary for cartilage development.

A variety of diseases are influenced by Wnt signaling cascades, which modulate biological processes including early embryonic development, organogenesis, growth as well as postnatal tissue homeostasis [37]. Several signaling cascades are activated by Wnt proteins. The best understood pathway is the so-called ‘canonical’ Wnt signaling pathway, resulting in the translocation of β-catenin to the nucleus. Other cascades are collectively classified as ‘noncanonical.’ It is evident that the Wnt/b-catenin pathway displays a great deal of complexity and fine-tuning, and many aspects of its regulation are still unknown [38]. Finely tuned Wnt signaling pathway is required for cartilage and bone homeostasis: in rodent models, both activation and suppression of the Wnt–β-catenin cascade can cause osteoarthritis [39, 40]. It has been reported that Wnts are crucial for articular cartilage and bone homeostasis, as we found a decreased expression of Wnt signaling in human OA cartilage compared to controls. But some other researchers investigated that cartilage can be damaged and the stable articular chondrocyte phenotype lost as a result of excessive Wnt signaling [41]. Interestingly, in this study, we revealed that Wnt signaling could be depressed because of GEM knockdown, inducing a loss in cartilage. In 2009, Yusas et al. found that as a result of tamoxifen-driven activation of β-catenin signaling in cartilage, proteoglycans were initially lost in a mouse model, followed by increased cartilage thickness and cell proliferation [42]. The conditional ablation of β-catenin in chondrocytes results in hypocellularity in articular cartilage, which is consistent with the observation that the activity of β-catenin regulates the proliferation of chondrogenic cells. Recently, Giovanna et al. demonstrated that both WNT-3A and the Wnt inhibitor DKK1 induced dedifferentiation in human articular chondrocytes by simultaneously activating β-catenin-dependent and -independent responses. They proposed a novel model in which a single WNT can simultaneously activate multiple pathways with distinct and independent outcomes and with reciprocal regulation [43]. In addition, Bradley et al. found that Wnt5a and Wnt5b promote early chondrogenesis by activating noncanonical Wnt signaling [44, 45]. Hence, when Wnt/β-catenin is both activated and inhibited, mice appear to develop OA-like disease. According to the present study, we discovered that Wnt activation reverses the effects of Gem silencing on chondrogenic differentiation.

Inevitably, there are some limitations to our research. The results we observed came from in vitro experiments. It is true that in vitro experiments bring stable conditions and reduce interference factors, but at the same time, they inevitably ignore the biological complexity of the in vivo environment. Although we have also observed the expression of GEM from tissues of human patients, we still need to reproduce this process in animal experiments to obtain more comprehensive biological changes and evidence and to have a deeper understanding of the mechanism of GEM on chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage matrix formation in organisms. As a whole, the Gem-Wnt axis plays a crucial role in regulating the differentiation of chondrocytes and matrix formation to maintain cartilage homeostasis, and targeting Gem in chondrocytes might represent an effective strategy to control OA cartilage disruption.

Conclusion

Our results collectively validated that GEM functions as a novel regulator mediating chondrogenic differentiation and cartilage matrix formation through Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

References

  1. Boer CG, Hatzikotoulas K, Southam L, Stefansdottir L, Zhang Y, De Almeida R, Coutinho TTWu, Zheng J, Hartley A, Teder-Laving M, Skogholt AH, Terao C, Zengini E, Alexiadis G, Barysenka A, Bjornsdottir G, Gabrielsen ME, Gilly A, Ingvarsson T, Johnsen MB, Jonsson H, Kloppenburg M, Luetge A, Lund SH, Magi R, Mangino M, Nelissen RRGHH, Shivakumar M, Steinberg J, Takuwa H, Thomas LF, Tuerlings M, Babis GC, Cheung JPY, Kang JH, Kraft P, Lietman SA, Samartzis D, Slagboom PE, Stefansson K, Thorsteinsdottir U, Tobias JH, Uitterlinden AG, Winsvold B, Zwart JA, Davey SG, Sham PC, Thorleifsson G, Gaunt TR, Morris AP, Valdes AM, Tsezou A, Cheah KSE, Ikegawa S, Hveem K, Esko T, Wilkinson JM, Meulenbelt I, Lee MTM, van Meurs JBJ, Styrkarsdottir U, Zeggini E. Deciphering osteoarthritis genetics across 826,690 individuals from 9 populations. Cell. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.038.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hochberg MC, Guermazi A, Guehring H, Aydemir A, Wax S, Fleuranceau-Morel P, Reinstrup BA, Byrjalsen I, Ragnar AJ, Eckstein F. Effect of intra-articular sprifermin vs placebo on femorotibial joint cartilage thickness in patients with osteoarthritis: the FORWARD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.14735.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu X, Zhao J, Jiang H, Guo H, Li Y, Li H, Feng Y, Ke J, Long X. ALPK1 accelerates the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis by activating NLRP3 signaling. J Bone Miner Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwartz NB, Domowicz M. Chondrodysplasias due to proteoglycan defects. Glycobiology. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/12.4.57r.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bateman JF, Boot-Handford RP, Lamande SR. Genetic diseases of connective tissues: cellular and extracellular effects of ECM mutations. Nat Rev Genet. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kiani C, Chen L, Wu YJ, Yee AJ, Yang BB. Structure and function of aggrecan. Cell Res. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cr.7290106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Styrkarsdottir U, Lund SH, Thorleifsson G, Zink F, Stefansson OA, Sigurdsson JK, Juliusson K, Bjarnadottir K, Sigurbjornsdottir S, Jonsson S, Norland K, Stefansdottir L, Sigurdsson A, Sveinbjornsson G, Oddsson A, Bjornsdottir G, Gudmundsson RL, Halldorsson GH, Rafnar T, Jonsdottir I, Steingrimsson E, Norddahl GL, Masson G, Sulem P, Jonsson H, Ingvarsson T, Gudbjartsson DF, Thorsteinsdottir U, Stefansson K. Meta-analysis of Icelandic and UK data sets identifies missense variants in SMO, IL11, COL11A1 and 13 more new loci associated with osteoarthritis. Nat Genet. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0247-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Beguin P, Nagashima K, Gonoi T, Shibasaki T, Takahashi K, Kashima Y, Ozaki N, Geering K, Iwanaga T, Seino S. Regulation of Ca2+ channel expression at the cell surface by the small G-protein kir/Gem. Nature. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1038/35079621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yanuar A, Sakurai S, Kitano K, Hakoshima T. Crystal structure of human Rad GTPase of the RGK-family. Genes Cells. 2006;2006:961–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2006.00994.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu G, Papa A, Katchman AN, Zakharov SI, Roybal D, Hennessey JA, Kushner J, Yang L, Chen BX, Kushnir A, Dangas K, Gygi SP, Pitt GS, Colecraft HM, Ben-Johny M, Kalocsay M, Marx SO. Mechanism of adrenergic Ca(V)1.2 stimulation revealed by proximity proteomics. Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1947-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Correll RN, Pang C, Niedowicz DM, Finlin BS, Andres DA. The RGK family of GTP-binding proteins: regulators of voltage-dependent calcium channels and cytoskeleton remodeling. Cell Signal. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.10.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chang L, Zhang J, Tseng Y-H, Xie C-Q, Ilany J, Bruning JC, Sun Z, Zhu X, Cui T, Youker KA, Yang Q, Day SM, Ronald Kahn C, Eugene Chen Y. Rad GTPase deficiency leads to cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.707257.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kvist AJ, Nystrom A, Hultenby K, Sasaki T, Talts JF, Aspberg A. The major basement membrane components localize to the chondrocyte pericellular matrix—A cartilage basement membrane equivalent? Matrix Biol. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matbio.2007.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Maguire J, Santoro T, Jensen P, Siebenlist U, Yewdell J, Kelly K. Gem: an induced, immediate early protein belonging to the Ras family. Science. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7912851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang DW, Zhang S, Wu J. Expression profile analysis to predict potential biomarkers for glaucoma: BMP1, DMD and GEM. PeerJ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Scamps F, Sangari S, Bowerman M, Rousset M, Bellis M, Cens T, Charnet P. Nerve injury induces a Gem-GTPase-dependent downregulation of P/Q-type Ca2+ channels contributing to neurite plasticity in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Pflugers Arch. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-014-1520-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Satija NK, Sharma D, Afrin F, Tripathi RP, Gangenahalli G. High throughput transcriptome profiling of lithium stimulated human mesenchymal stem cells reveals priming towards osteoblastic lineage. PLoS ONE. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Glasson SS, Chambers MG, Van Den Berg WB, Little CB. The OARSI histopathology initiative - recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the mouse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2010.05.025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang TC, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, Feng T, Zhou L, Tang W, Zhan L, Fu X, Liu S, Bo X, Yu G. Clusterprofiler 4.0: a universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;2012:284–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506580102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Huber W, Carey VJ, Gentleman R, Anders S, Carlson M, Carvalho BS, Bravo HC, Davis S, Gatto L, Girke T, Gottardo R, Hahne F, Hansen KD, Irizarry RA, Lawrence M, Love MI, MacDonald J, Obenchain V, Oles AK, Pages H, Reyes A, Shannon P, Smyth GK, Tenenbaum D, Waldron L, Morgan M. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with bioconductor. Nat Methods. 2015;2015:115–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, Puigserver P, Carlsson E, Ridderstrale M, Laurila E, Houstis N, Daly MJ, Patterson N, Mesirov JP, Golub TR, Tamayo P, Spiegelman B, Lander ES, Hirschhorn JN, Altshuler D, Groop LC. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grandi FC, Baskar R, Smeriglio P, Murkherjee S, Indelli PF, Amanatullah DF, Goodman S, Chu C, Bendall S, Bhutani N. Single-cell mass cytometry reveals cross-talk between inflammation-dampening and inflammation-amplifying cells in osteoarthritic cartilage. Sci Adv. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay5352.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Peng Z, Sun H, Bunpetch V, Koh Y, Wen Y, Wu D, Ouyang H. The regulation of cartilage extracellular matrix homeostasis in joint cartilage degeneration and regeneration. Biomaterials. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120555.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Loeser RF. Molecular mechanisms of cartilage destruction: mechanics, inflammatory mediators, and aging collide. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;2006:1357–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldring MB, Goldring SR. Osteoarthritis. J Cell Physiol. 2007;2007:626–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao L, Detamore MS. Chondrogenic differentiation of stem cells in human umbilical cord stroma with PGA and PLLA scaffolds. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2010. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2010.311135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Park DR, Kim J, Kim GM, Lee H, Kim M, Hwang D, Lee H, Kim HS, Kim W, Park MC, Shim H, Lee SY. Osteoclast-associated receptor blockade prevents articular cartilage destruction via chondrocyte apoptosis regulation. Nat Commun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18208-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sim HJ, Cho C, Kim HE, Hong JY, Song EK, Kwon KY, Jang DG, Kim SJ, Lee HS, Lee C, Kwon T, Yang S, Park T. Augmented ERAD (ER-associated degradation) activity in chondrocytes is necessary for cartilage development and maintenance. Sci Adv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl4222.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu G, Papa A, Katchman AN, Zakharov SI, Roybal D, Hennessey JA, Kushner J, Yang L, Chen B-X, Kushnir A, Dangas K, Gygi SP, Pitt GS, Colecraft HM, Ben-Johny M, Kalocsay M, Marx SO. Mechanism of adrenergic CaV1.2 stimulation revealed by proximity proteomics. Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-1947-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ward Y, Spinelli B, Quon MJ, Chen H, Ikeda SR, Kelly K. Phosphorylation of critical serine residues in Gem separates cytoskeletal reorganization from down-regulation of calcium channel activity. Mol Cell Biol. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.2.651-661.2004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hatzoglou A, Ader I, Splingard A, Flanders J, Saade E, Leroy I, Traver S, Aresta S, de Gunzburg J. Gem associates with Ezrin and acts via the Rho-GAP protein Gmip to down-regulate the Rho pathway. Mol Biol Cell. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e06-06-0510.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Withers CN, Brown DM, Byiringiro I, Allen MR, Condon KW, Satin J, Andres DA. Rad GTPase is essential for the regulation of bone density and bone marrow adipose tissue in mice. Bone. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2017.07.018.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Monteagudo S, Lories RJ. Cushioning the cartilage: a canonical Wnt restricting matter. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2017.171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sugimura R, Li L. Noncanonical Wnt signaling in vertebrate development, stem cells, and diseases. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.20195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Lories RJ, Corr M, Lane NE. To Wnt or not to Wnt: the bone and joint health dilemma. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2013.25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Quintiens J, De Roover A, Cornelis FMF, Escribano-Nunez A, Sermon A, Pazmino S, Monteagudo S, Lories RJ. Hypoxia and Wnt signaling inversely regulate expression of chondroprotective molecule ANP32A in articular cartilage. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yuasa T, Kondo N, Yasuhara R, Shimono K, Mackem S, Pacifici M, Iwamoto M, Enomoto-Iwamoto M. Transient activation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling induces abnormal growth plate closure and articular cartilage thickening in postnatal mice. Am J Pathol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2009.081173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Nalesso G, Sherwood J, Bertrand J, Pap T, Ramachandran M, De Bari C, Pitzalis C, Dell’Accio F. WNT-3A modulates articular chondrocyte phenotype by activating both canonical and noncanonical pathways. J Cell Biol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201011051.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Bradley EW, Drissi MH. WNT5A regulates chondrocyte differentiation through differential use of the CaN/NFAT and IKK/NF-kappaB pathways. Mol Endocrinol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2010-0037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Bradley EW, Drissi MH. Wnt5b regulates mesenchymal cell aggregation and chondrocyte differentiation through the planar cell polarity pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.22499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to thank Dr. Xiaoyu Li, Nachun Chen, Yuhao Chu, and Ziheng Luo for their helpful discussions. We would to thank Tsingke Biotechnology’s facility for assistance with RNA sequencing. We would like to thank the Central Laboratory of Southern Hospital of Southern Medical University (Bingyi Wu, Xiaolan Zhang, Xiaojing Wang, Guo Yin) for providing us with access to a tissue microtome, fluorescence microscope, and capture system. We thank American Journal Experts for their editing service.

Funding

This work was supported by the following grants: National Natural Science Foundation of China 31771051 (L.Z.), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2018B030311041 (L.Z.), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou 201803010114 (L.Z.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lu Gan, Zhonghao Deng, Yiran Wei and Hongfang Li are contributed equally.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China

    Lu Gan, Zhonghao Deng, Yiran Wei & Liang Zhao

  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Construction and Detection in Tissue Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China

    Lu Gan, Zhonghao Deng, Yiran Wei & Liang Zhao

  3. Yijiandian Clinic, Beijing, 100033, China

    Hongfang Li

Authors
  1. Lu Gan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhonghao Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiran Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongfang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors made substantial contributions to the study. L.G., Z.D., Y.W., and H.L. contributed to the data curation, formal analysis, validation, investigation, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. L.Z. contributed to conceptualization, resources, data curation, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration, writing—review and editing. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Southern Medical University NanFang Hospital (ref. NFEC-2020-166). Donors gave their informed consent to have their anonymized tissues used for scientific research purposes.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1

, also see Figure 1. (A) A schematic diagram to represent zoning and grading of femoral and tibial articular cartilage tissues from OA patients. (B) The stage of OA tissue and schematic description of OARSI and ICRS grading system for OA cartilage. (C) Mankin grades of grade 0 and grade 4 cartilage tissues. (D, E) Quantitation of immunofluorescence staining of GEM and MMP13 in human knee articular cartilage. (F) The mRNA expressions of RRAD and REM of grade 0 and grade 4 cartilage tissues. (G) Cell viability of C28/I2 cells after treated with TBHP. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.001. Figure S2., also see Figure 3. (A) The mRNA expression of Gem of ATDC5 transfected with control siRNA and three different siRNAs targeting Gem. Si_2 was used in the Gem silencing experiments. (B) Alcian Blue staining of Control and Gem-Kd cells 7 and 14 days after chondrogenic induction (scler bar = 100 μm).Figure S3., also see Figure 4. KEGG browser result of Wnt signaling pathway and DEGs upregulated in Control cells were colored in red. Figure S4., also see Figure 5. (A, B, C, D) Western blotting detected the protein levels of β-catenin in in nucleus and cytoplasm in Gem-Kd cells compared to controls. Table S1. Primer sequences for real-time PCR in this study. Table S2. RNA contamination detection

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gan, L., Deng, Z., Wei, Y. et al. Decreased expression of GEM in osteoarthritis cartilage regulates chondrogenic differentiation via Wnt/β-catenin signaling. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 751 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04236-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04236-z

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X