Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Comparison of thoracolumbar versus non-thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in risk factors, vertebral compression degree and pre-hospital back pain

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 18, Article number: 643 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Thoracolumbar spine is at high risk of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF). This study aimed to identify the differences in risk factors, vertebral compression degree and back pain characteristics of thoracolumbar OVCF (TL-OVCF) and non-thoracolumbar OVCF (nTL-OVCF).

Methods

OVCF patients hospitalized in a spine center between June 2016 and October 2020 were retrospectively studied. Demographics, comorbidity, spine trauma, bone mineral density, duration of pre-hospital back pain, extent of vertebral marrow edema, and degree of vertebral compression of patients with nTL-OVCF were summarized and compared to those with TL-OVCF.

Results

A total of 944 patients with acute single-segment OVCF were included. There were 708 (75.0%) TL-OVCF located in T11-L2 and 236 (25.0%) nTL-OVCF in lower lumbar (L3-L5) and middle thoracic (T5-T10) spine. The female-male ratio was 4.1 in nTL-OVCF and differed not significantly from TL-OVCF. The middle thoracic OVCF were older and had higher comorbidity of coronary heart disease (21.3%) and cerebral infarction (36.3%) than TL-OVCF (12.1% and 20.6%). In nTL-OVCF the ratio of apparent spine trauma (44.9%) and pre-hospital back pain ≤ 1 week (47.5%) was lower than in TL-OVCF (66.9% and 62.6%). The T-score value of lumbar spine was − 2.99 ± 1.11, − 3.24 ± 1.14, − 3.05 ± 1.40 in < 70, 70–80, > 80 years old TL-OVCF and differed not significantly from nTL-OVCF. The lower lumbar OVCF had more cranial type of vertebral marrow edema (21.8%) and fewer concurrent lumbodorsal fasciitis (30.8%) than TL-OVCF (16.8% and 43.4%). In TL-OVCF the anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio was lower with back pain for > 4 weeks than for ≤ 1, 1–2, and 2–4 weeks. In nTL-OVCF the degree of vertebral compression differed not significantly with pre-hospital back pain for ≤ 1, 1–2, 2–4, and > 4 weeks.

Conclusions

Thoracolumbar spine has 2-folds higher risk of OVCF than non-thoracolumbar spine. Non-thoracolumbar OVCF are not associated with female gender, apparent spine trauma or poor bone mineral density, but tend to maintain the degree of vertebral compression and cause longer duration of pre-hospital back pain.

Background

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) are common in aged population with bone fragility, causing back pain and promoting kyphosis [1, 2]. The worldwide incidence of OVCF was estimated to be 1.4 million per year [3], which most often involved thoracolumbar spine [4]. Biomechanical modeling has revealed that the junction of thoracic and lumbar spine yields mechanical stress on different patterns of loading [5,6,7,8,9], thus increasing the risk of thoracolumbar OVCF (TL-OVCF). On the other hand, mechanical support from rib cage and paravertebral muscles might help to reduce the risk of non-thoracolumbar OVCF (nTL-OVCF) in middle thoracic and lower lumbar spine [5, 9, 10]. In addition to bone fragility and mechanical stress, evidence accumulates that OVCF are associated with multiple risk factors ranging from aging, female gender, comorbidity of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, to life styles such as chronic smoking and alcohol consumption [11,12,13,14]. However, to date, it is unknown whether TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF would have different risk factors and clinical manifestation of OVCF. We hypothesize in the non-thoracolumbar spine with comparatively lower fracture risk, OVCF might be associated with severer spine trauma or poorer bone fragility than that in TL-OVCF.

In this study, the demographics, comorbidity profiles, spine trauma, bone mineral density, duration of pre-hospital back pain, extent of vertebral marrow edema, and degree of vertebral compression of patients with nTL-OVCF were summarized and compared to those with TL-OVCF. By identifying the differences in risk factors and back pain characteristics of OVCF within and beyond the thoracolumbar spine, our study may help to provide a segment-specific approach to better understand the pathogenesis and clinical manifestation of OVCF.

Methods

Study population

The study was approved by Ethic Committee for Clinical Research of Zhongda hospital affiliated to Southeast University (No.2022ZDSYLL016). Medical records and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of OVCF patients received vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in the spine center from June 2016 to October 2020 were retrospectively studied. For accurate defining thoracolumbar and non-thoracolumbar OVCF, only the single-segment OVCF were included in this study. Inclusion criteria: (1) aged ≥ 45 years old; (2) diagnosis of single-segment OVCF based on complains of back pain and MRI of bone marrow edema in single thoracic or lumbar vertebrae (Fig. 1); (3) full medical records depicting the spine trauma, comorbidity, and duration of back pain before hospitalization. Exclusion criteria: (1) diagnosis of vertebral infection, hemangioma, multiple myeloma, metastatic tumors, and other pathological vertebral fractures; (2) previous spine surgery with vertebroplasty or internal fixation; (3) incomplete medical records or MRI of thoracic and lumbar spine.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Extent of vertebral bone marrow edema and degree of vertebral compression. The sagittal T2-weighted fat suppression MRI of lumbar spine (a-c). A 72 years old female complaining back pain for 1 day after fell on ground showed vertebral bone marrow edema (white arrow) in the cranial half of L1 vertebrae (a). A 76 years old female complaining back pain for 10 days after fell on ground showed vertebral bone marrow edema in the caudal half of L2 vertebrae (b). A 67 years old female complaining back pain for 11 days after fell on ground showed vertebral bone marrow edema in both cranial and caudal half of T12 vertebrae (c). Longitudinal edema signals (red arrow) were detected along and dorsal to thoracolumbar fascia (c). The anterior and posterior height (red line) of T12 vertebrae was measured to quantify the degree of vertebral compression (c)

Full size image

Grouping and data collection

The study population was grouped according to the anatomical location and incidence of OVCF: group of TL-OVCF that yielded high incidence of OVCF involving T11-L2 vertebra, and group of nTL-OVCF that yielded comparatively lower incidence of OVCF in middle thoracic (T5-T10) and lower lumbar (L3-L5) spine. In case of lumbosacral transitional vertebra, two radiologists identified and reconfirmed the location of OVCF.

In each group the demographics (age, gender), comorbidity profiles (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, cerebral infarction, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), spine trauma, and duration of pre-hospital back pain were summarized from medical records. The age of patient was sub-grouped into < 60, 60–70, 70–80, and ≥ 80 years old. The type of spine trauma was divided into apparent trauma: fall on ground or crush injury to spine; uncertain trauma: heavy lift injury, lumbar sprain, strenuous cough; and no evident trauma. The duration of pre-hospital back pain was sub-grouped into ≤ 1 week, 1–2 weeks, 2–4 weeks, 1–3 months, and > 3 months. Bone mineral density (BMD) was quantified by the T-score values calculated from the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of lumbar spine and hip joint.

MRI of thoracic and lumbar spine was reviewed to quantify the degree of vertebral compression and extent of bone marrow edema. The anterior and posterior height of compressed vertebrae was measured on the sagittal MRI taken at mid-body and medial wall of two pedicles (Fig. 1). The degree of vertebral compression was quantified by averaging the ratio of anterior and posterior vertebral height. The extent of vertebral marrow edema was evaluated on the sagittal T2-weighted fat suppression MRI and defined as diffused type: edema detected both in the cranial and caudal half of vertebrae; cranial type: edema restrained in the cranial half; caudal type: edema restrained in the caudal half (Fig. 1). In case that longitudinal edema signals were detected along and dorsal to the thoracolumbar fascia, the patient was diagnosed of OVCF with concurrent lumbodorsal fasciitis (Fig. 1).

Statistical analysis

Prism software (ver.9.1.2; Graphpad, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics with Pearson χ2 were performed to compare the frequencies and percentages of categorical variables. Continuous quantitative data were presented as means ± standard deviations. Differences between two groups were analyzed by unpaired t test. Differences among multiple groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. Statistical significance was defined as P value < 0.05.

Results

Thoracolumbar spine had 2-folds higher risk of OVCF than non-thoracolumbar spine

A total of 1490 vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty surgeries were performed in the spine center of Zhongda hospital from June 2016 to October 2020, of which 944 single-segment OVCF were included in this study. The 944 OVCF were unevenly distributed in T5-L5 vertebra, with L1 having the highest incidence (29.5%) of OVCF. The incidence of OVCF decreased gradually from L1 to L5 and from T12 to T10, then increased upwards and peaked at T7, showing an asymmetrical bimodal distribution pattern (Fig. 2). There were 708 (75.0%) TL-OVCF located in T11-L2, 156 (16.5%) lower lumbar OVCF in L3-L5, and 80 (8.5%) middle thoracic OVCF in T5-T10. Thoracolumbar spine had 2-folds higher risk of OVCF than non-thoracolumbar spine.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Anatomical distribution of single-segment OVCF. 944 single-segment OVCF showed asymmetrical bimodal distribution pattern peaked at L1 in thoracolumbar spine and T7 in middle thoracic spine. TL-OVCF: thoracolumbar OVCF; nTL-OVCF: non-thoracolumbar OVCF; MT: middle thoracic; LL: lower lumbar

Full size image

nTL-OVCF in middle thoracic spine were older and increased with aging in females

The 944 OVCF were aged 45–97 years old and included 769 females and 175 males. The female-male ratio was 4.1 in nTL-OVCF and differed not significantly from that of 4.5 in TL-OVCF (Table 1). Females were 71.52 ± 9.37 yeas old and on average 3.1 years older than males (74.63 ± 10.29 yeas old; t = 3.88, P < 0.001). nTL-OVCF were aged 72.25 ± 10.10 years old and differed not significantly from TL-OVCF (72.05 ± 9.46 yeas old; t = 0.285, P = 0.776). nTL-OVCF in middle thoracic spine were aged 74.95 ± 9.78 years old and significantly older than lower lumbar OVCF (70.87 ± 10.00 years old; q = 4.38, P = 0.006) and TL-OVCF (q = 3.63, P = 0.028). The ratio of females aged < 60, 60–70, 70–80, and ≥ 80 years old showed steady increase in middle thoracic OVCF but not in lower lumbar OVCF and TL-OVCF (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of thoracolumbar and non-thoracolumbar OVCF
Full size table

nTL-OVCF in middle thoracic spine had higher comorbidity of coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction

Of the 944 OVCF 458 (48.5%) reported comorbidity of hypertension, 160 (16.9%) of diabetes, 117 (12.4%) of coronary heart disease, 204 (21.6%) of cerebral infarction, and 34 (3.6%) of chronic pulmonary disease. The middle thoracic OVCF had higher comorbidity of coronary heart disease (21.3%) and cerebral infarction (36.3%) than lower lumbar OVCF and TL-OVCF (Table 1). There were 359 (38.0%) reporting none, 306 (32.4%) with one, 187 (19.8%) with two, 76 (8.1%) with three, and 16 (1.7%) with four of the five common geriatric comorbidities. The number of comorbidity was not significantly different between nTL-OVCF and TL-OVCF (Table 1).

nTL-OVCF experienced less apparent spine trauma and complained longer pre-hospital back pain

Of the 944 OVCF 580 (61.4%) reported apparent spine trauma, 172 (18.2%) with uncertain trauma, and 192 (20.3%) denied evident trauma to spine. The ratio of apparent spine trauma was 44.9% in nTL-OVCF and significantly lower than in TL-OVCF (66.9%) (Table 1). There were 555 (58.8%) OVCF hospitalized after complaining back pain for ≤ 1 week, 157 (16.6%) for 1–2 weeks, 134 (14.2%) for 2–4 weeks, 54 (5.7%) for 1–3 months, and 44 (4.6%) for > 3 months. The ratio of pre-hospital back pain for ≤ 1 week was 47.5% in nTL-OVCF and significantly lower than in TL-OVCF (62.6%) (Table 1).

nTL-OVCF maintained vertebral compression degree with longer duration of pre-hospital back pain

The anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio was 0.81 ± 0.12 in TL-OVCF and significantly lower than in lower lumbar OVCF, but differed not significantly from that in middle thoracic OVCF (Fig. 3). In TL-OVCF, the anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio was 0.70 ± 0.16 with pre-hospital back pain for > 4 weeks and significantly lower than for 2–4 weeks, 1–2 weeks, and ≤ 1 week. In middle thoracic and lower lumbar OVCF, the anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio differed not significantly with pre-hospital back pain for ≤ 1, 1–2, 2–4, and > 4 weeks (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of vertebral compression degree. Comparison of the anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio in TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF (a-d). The anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio in TL-OVCF and middle thoracic OVCF was significantly lower than in lower lumbar OVCF (a). The anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio of TL-OVCF was significantly lower with pre-hospital back pain for 2–4 and > 4 weeks than for ≤ 1 and 1–2 weeks (b). The anterior–posterior vertebral height ratio of nTL-OVCF in middle thoracic (c) and lower lumbar spine (d) differed not significantly with back pain for ≤ 1, 1–2, 2–4, and > 4 weeks. TL-OVCF: thoracolumbar OVCF; nTL-OVCF: non-thoracolumbar OVCF; MT: middle thoracic; LL: lower lumbar; w: weeks; ns: not significantly different; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.001

Full size image

nTL-OVCF in lower lumbar spine had more cranial type of bone marrow edema and fewer concurrent lumbodorsal fasciitis

Of the 944 OVCF 769 (81.4%) showed diffused, 158 (16.7%) cranial, and 17 (1.8%) caudal type of vertebral bone marrow edema. The lower lumbar OVCF had higher ratio (21.8%) of cranial type of vertebral bone marrow edema than middle thoracic OVCF and TL-OVCF (Table 1). There were 384 (40.7%) OVCF showing edema signals in lumbodorsal fascia and diagnosed with concurrent lumbodorsal fasciitis. The lower lumbar OVCF had lower ratio (30.8%) of concurrent lumbodorsal fasciitis than middle thoracic OVCF and TL-OVCF (Table 1).

nTL-OVCF and TL-OVCF had comparable bone mineral density

BMD was available from 371 (39.3%) OVCF and in 308 (40.1%) females. The T-score value of lumbar spine was − 2.99 ± 1.11, − 3.24 ± 1.14, − 3.05 ± 1.40 in < 70, 70–80, > 80 years old TL-OVCF, and differed not significantly from that in middle thoracic and lower lumbar OVCF (Fig. 4). The T-score value of hip joint was − 1.57 ± 0.86, − 1.97 ± 0.88, − 2.47 ± 1.08 in < 70, 70–80, > 80 years old TL-OVCF, and differed not significantly from that in middle thoracic and lower lumbar OVCF (Fig. 4). Of the 308 females, no significant difference was detected between TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF in the BMD of lumbar spine or hip joint (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of bone mineral density. Comparison of the T-score values of lumbar spine (a-c, g-i) and hip joint (d-f, j-l) in TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF. The T-score values showed no significant difference between TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF aged < 70, 70–80, and > 80 years old (a-f). The T-score values of females showed no significant difference between TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF aged < 70, 70–80, and > 80 years old (g-l). TL-OVCF: thoracolumbar OVCF; nTL-OVCF: non-thoracolumbar OVCF; MT: middle thoracic; LL: lower lumbar; yrs: years; ns: not significantly different

Full size image

Discussion

As cement augmentation and spinal fixation potentially accelerate OVCF in adjacent vertebra [1, 11, 15], and multiple continuous OVCF often associate with high-energy trauma [16], the asymmetrical bimodal distribution of 944 single-segment OVCF without previous spine surgery may represent a nature distribution pattern of OVCF. We found that thoracolumbar vertebra had 2-folds higher risk of OVCF than non-thoracolumbar vertebra, supporting an increasing mechanical stress in the junction of thoracic and lumbar spine, peaking at L1 [5,6,7,8,9]. Moreover, we noticed that in the middle thoracic spine protected by rib cage, the incidence of OVCF was much lower than TL-OVCF, but still peaked at T7, suggesting increased mechanical stress in the apical vertebra of thoracic kyphosis [4]. In the lower lumbar vertebra with caudally increasing paravertebral muscular support [10, 17, 18], the incidence of OVCF decreased gradually from L1 to L5, suggesting absorption of the mechanical stress down along lumbar spine. In support of this notion, the lower lumbar OVCF had significantly higher ratio of cranial type of vertebral bone marrow edema than TL-OVCF and middle thoracic OVCF. The asymmetrical bimodal distribution pattern of single-segment OVCF could help to quantify the differences between thoracolumbar and non-thoracolumbar spine in the risk of mechanical injury and OVCF.

Despite increasingly recognized risk factors of vertebral fractures and re-fractures [11,12,13,14,15, 19, 20], it remains unknown the differences in the risk factors of TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF. Here, we found that females had 3-folds higher risk of OVCF and experienced OVCF 3 years earlier than males. However, the female-male ratio was not significantly different between TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF, suggesting a gender-independent anatomical distribution of OVCF. Aging causes bone fragility and potentiates OVCF [11,12,13,14]. We found that middle thoracic OVCF was comparatively older and had higher comorbidity of coronary heart disease and cerebral infarction than TL-OVCF, suggesting aging as risk factor for middle thoracic OVCF. Age-related bone mass loss and intervertebral disc degeneration increases thoracic kyphosis [21, 22], the increased middle thoracic OVCF in older patients might be attributed to an increased mechanical stress from thoracic hyperkyphosis [23, 24]. OVCF are most often caused by low-energy trauma [1, 2, 16]. Here, we found that 61.4% OVCF experienced apparent trauma such as fall on ground and crush injury to spine. However, just opposite to our hypothesis that nTL-OVCF might be associated with severer spine trauma, nTL-OVCF were shown to report lower ratio of apparent spine trauma than TL-OVCF. Comparison of BMD also identified no significant difference in the T-score values of lumbar spine or hip joint between TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF. The independence of nTL-OVCF on female gender, apparent spine trauma, and poor BMD suggested the risk and distribution of TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF might be determined mainly by the efficiency of mechanical loading, transmitting, and absorbing within specific segment and junction.

OVCF is often hospitalized with acute or chronic back pain [1,2,3]. Here, we found that the duration of pre-hospital back pain varied significantly from ≤ 1 week to > 3 months, and TL-OVCF tended to be hospitalized earlier than nTL-OVCF. Non-thoracolumbar spine is protected by rib cage and lumbar muscles, the delayed hospitalization of nTL-OVCF might be attributed to the paravertebral mechanical support that stabilizes vertebral compression to alleviate back pain [5, 9, 10]. In support of this notion, TL-OVCF rather than nTL-OVCF showed aggravation of vertebral compression with longer duration (> 2 weeks) of pre-hospital back pain. Evidence accumulates that lumbodorsal fascia is innervated and could be a potential source of back pain [25,26,27]. Here, we found a comorbidity rate of 40.7% of lumbodorsal fasciitis in acute single-segment OVCF without previous spine surgery. The higher rate of concurrent lumbodorsal fasciitis in TL-OVCF (43.3%) might aggravate back pain and promote early hospitalization.

Our study had several limitations. First, the design of retrospective study in single spine center would unavoidably yield bias in patient selection and data collection. The effects of pre-hospital bracing and analgesic medication [28, 29] on back pain and vertebral bone marrow edema were not evaluated. Secondly, BMD was unavailable from 60% of study population and in most of males, thus failing to fully understand the role of bone fragility in causing nTL-OVCF. Thirdly, radiographic parameters of regional or global kyphosis [20,21,22,23], body mass index [11, 14], anti-osteoporosis medication [14, 19, 30,31,32] and other risk factors of OVCF were not evaluated and compared between TL-OVCF and nTL-OVCF. Prospective studies with stratified participants and long-term follow-up are warranted for a better understanding of the segment-specific risk factors of OVCF.

Conclusions

Single-segment OVCF demonstrates an asymmetrical bimodal distribution pattern showing 2-folds higher risk of TL-OVCF than nTL-OVCF. nTL-OVCF are not associated with female gender, apparent spine trauma or poor bone mineral density, but tend to maintain the degree of vertebral compression and cause longer duration of pre-hospital back pain.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

OVCF:

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

TL-OVCF:

Thoracolumbar OVCF

nTL-OVCF:

Non-thoracolumbar OVCF

BMD:

Bone mineral density

References

  1. Martikos K, Greggi T, Faldini C, Vommaro F, Scarale A. Osteoporotic thoracolumbar compression fractures: long-term retrospective comparison between vertebroplasty and conservative treatment. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(Suppl 2):244–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5605-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang J, He X, Fan Y, Du J, Hao D. Risk factors for conservative treatment failure in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs). Arch Osteoporos. 2019;14(1):24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-019-0563-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnell O, Kanis JA. An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1726–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siminoski K, Lee KC, Jen H, Warshawski R, Matzinger MA, Shenouda N, Charron M, Coblentz C, Dubois J, Kloiber R, Nadel H, O’Brien K, Reed M, Sparrow K, Webber C, Lentle B, Ward LM. STOPP Consortium. Anatomical distribution of vertebral fractures: comparison of pediatric and adult spines. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(7):1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1837-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruno AG, Burkhart K, Allaire B, Anderson DE, Bouxsein ML. Spinal loading patterns from biomechanical modeling explain the high incidence of vertebral fractures in the thoracolumbar region. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(6):1282–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ignasiak D, Rüeger A, Sperr R, Ferguson SJ. Thoracolumbar spine loading associated with kinematics of the young and the elderly during activities of daily living. J Biomech. 2018;70:175–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mokhtarzadeh H, Anderson DE, Allaire BT, Bouxsein ML. Patterns of load-to-strength ratios along the spine in a population-based cohort to evaluate the contribution of spinal loading to vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2021;36(4):704–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sun PD, Zhang XX, Zhang YW, Wang Z, Wu XY, Wu YC, Yu XL, Gan HR, Liu XD, Ai ZZ, He JY, Dong XP. Stress analysis of the thoracolumbar junction in the process of backward fall: an experimental study and finite element analysis. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(4):1117. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10551.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sopon M, Oleksik V, Roman M, Cofaru N, Oleksik M, Mohor C, Boicean A, Fleaca R. Biomechanical study of the osteoporotic spine fracture: optical approach. J Pers Med. 2021;11(9):907. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11090907.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Mörl F, Günther M, Riede JM, Hammer M, Schmitt S. Loads distributed in vivo among vertebrae, muscles, spinal ligaments, and intervertebral discs in a passively flexed lumbar spine. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2020;19(6):2015–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01322-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mao W, Dong F, Huang G, He P, Chen H, Qin S, Li A. Risk factors for secondary fractures to percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):644. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02722-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang ZL, Yang JS, Hao DJ, Liu TJ, Jing QM. Risk factors for new vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:1193–200. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S312623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Robinson WA, Carlson BC, Poppendeck H, Wanderman NR, Bunta AD, Murphy S, Sietsema DL, Daffner SD, Edwards BJ, Watts NB, Tosi LL, Anderson PA, Freedman BA. Osteoporosis-related vertebral fragility fractures: a review and analysis of the American Orthopaedic Association’s own the bone database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(8):E430-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Che H, Breuil V, Cortet B, Paccou J, Thomas T, Chapuis L, Debiais F, Mehsen-Cetre N, Javier RM, Loiseau Peres S, Roux C, Briot K. Vertebral fractures cascade: potential causes and risk factors. Osteoporos Int. 2019;30(3):555–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-018-4793-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Echt M, Ranson W, Steinberger J, Yassari R, Cho SK. A systematic review of treatment strategies for the prevention of junctional complications after long-segment fusions in the osteoporotic spine. Global Spine J. 2021;11(5):792–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220939902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kano S, Tanikawa H, Mogami Y, Shibata S, Takanashi S, Oji Y, Aoki T, Oba H, Ikegami S, Takahashi J. Comparison between continuous and discontinuous multiple vertebral compression fractures. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(9):1867–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2210-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalichman L, Carmeli E, Been E. The association between imaging parameters of the paraspinal muscles, spinal degeneration, and low back pain. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2562957. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2562957.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhu DC, Lin JH, Xu JJ, Guo Q, Wang YH, Jiang C, Lu HG, Wu YS. An assessment of morphological and pathological changes in paravertebral muscle degeneration using imaging and histological analysis: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):854. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04734-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu K, Yin Y, Li C, Jin Y, Shan HQ. Efficacy of annual zoledronic acid in initial percutaneous kyphoplasty patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a 3-year follow-up study. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32(7):1429–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-020-05816-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lin T, Lu J, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Chen G, Gu Y, Zhou L, Liu W. Does spinal sagittal imbalance lead to future vertebral compression fractures in osteoporosis patients? Spine J. 2021;21(8):1362–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsumoto K, Shah A, Kelkar A, Mumtaz M, Kumaran Y, Goel VK. Sagittal imbalance may lead to higher risks of vertebral compression fractures and disc degeneration-a finite element analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;167:e962-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Woods GN, Huang MH, Lee JH, Cawthon PM, Fink HA, Schousboe JT, Kado DM. Factors associated with kyphosis and kyphosis progression in older men: the MrOS study. J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35(11):2193–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koelé MC, Lems WF, Willems HC. The clinical relevance of hyperkyphosis: a narrative review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Katzman WB, Vittinghoff E, Kado DM, Lane NE, Ensrud KE, Shipp K. Thoracic kyphosis and rate of incident vertebral fractures: the Fracture Intervention Trial. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(3):899–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3478-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilke J, Schleip R, Klingler W, Stecco C. The lumbodorsal fascia as a potential source of low back pain: a narrative review. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5349620. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5349620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sinhorim L, Amorim MDS, Ortiz ME, Bittencourt EB, Bianco G, da Silva FC, Horewicz VV, Schleip R, Reed WR, Mazzardo-Martins L, Martins DF. Potential nociceptive role of the thoracolumbar fascia: a scope review involving in vivo and ex vivo studies. J Clin Med. 2021;10(19):4342. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194342.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Yue J, Huang M, Lin J, Huang C, Chen J, Wu Y, Wang X. Risk factors for postoperative residual back pain after percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(10):2568–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06493-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Osteoporotic vertebral fractures: current concepts of conservative care. Br Med Bull. 2012;102:171–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldr048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Longo UG, Loppini M, Denaro L, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Conservative management of patients with an osteoporotic vertebral fracture: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(2):152–7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.26894.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Migliorini F, Maffulli N, Spiezia F, Tingart M, Maria PG, Riccardo G. Biomarkers as therapy monitoring for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):318. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02474-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Migliorini F, Colarossi G, Baroncini A, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Maffulli N. Pharmacological management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a level I evidence based-expert opinion. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021;14(1):105–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2021.1851192.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Migliorini F, Colarossi G, Eschweiler J, Oliva F, Driessen A, Maffulli N. Antiresorptive treatments for corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br Med Bull. 2022;143(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldac017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Ji-Yang Jin and Zhong-Jiang Wang, from the radiology department of Zhongda Hospital, for their aids in identifying lumbosacral transitional vertebra.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81871810), Jiangsu Commission of Health (M2022084), and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Key Discipline (Laboratory) Cultivation Unit (JSDW202222).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spine Surgery, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87# Dingjiaqiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, China

    Feng Wang, Rui Sun, Shao-Dong Zhang & Xiao-Tao Wu

  2. Surgery Research Center, School of Medicine, Southeast University, 87# Dingjiaqiao Road, Nanjing, 210009, China

    Feng Wang, Rui Sun, Shao-Dong Zhang & Xiao-Tao Wu

Authors
  1. Feng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shao-Dong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiao-Tao Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Materials preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by FW and RS. The first draft of manuscript was written by FW and all authors commented on previous version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shao-Dong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Ethic Committee for Clinical Research of Zhongda hospital affiliated to Southeast University (No. 2022ZDSYLL016).

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that human research participant provided informed consent for publication of the images in Fig. 1.

Competing interests

Feng Wang, Rui Sun, Shao-Dong Zhang, Xiao-Tao Wu declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Sun, R., Zhang, SD. et al. Comparison of thoracolumbar versus non-thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in risk factors, vertebral compression degree and pre-hospital back pain. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 643 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04140-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04140-6

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X