Skip to main content

Circ_0001825 promotes osteogenic differentiation in human-derived mesenchymal stem cells via miR-1270/SMAD5 axis

Abstract

Background

The implication of deregulated circular RNAs in osteoporosis (OP) has gradually been proposed. Herein, we aimed to study the function and mechanism of circ_0001825 in OP using osteogenic-induced human-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs).

Methods

The content of genes and proteins was tested by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. The osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs were evaluated by ALP activity and Alizarin Red staining, as well as the detection of osteogenesis-related markers. Cell viability and apoptosis were measured by CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry. The binding between miR-1270 and circ_0001825 or SMAD5 (SMAD Family Member 5) was confirmed by using dual-luciferase reporter assay and pull-down assay.

Results

Circ_0001825 was lowly expressed in OP patients and osteogenic induced hMSCs. Knockdown of circ_0001825 suppressed hMSC viability and osteogenic differentiation, while circ_0001825 overexpression showed the exact opposite effects. Mechanistically, circ_0001825/miR-1270/SMAD5 formed a feedback loop. MiR-1270 was increased and SMAD5 was decreased in OP patients and osteogenic induced hMSCs. MiR-1270 up-regulation suppressed hMSC viability and osteogenic differentiation, which was reversed by SMAD5 overexpression. Moreover, miR-1270 deficiency abolished the effects of circ_0001825 knockdown on hMSCs.

Conclusion

Circ_0001825 promoted hMSC viability and osteogenic differentiation via miR-1270/SMAD5 axis, suggesting the potential involvement of circ_0001825 in osteoporosis.

Introduction

Osteoporosis (OP) is a systemic skeletal disorder featured by defective bone architecture and low bone mineral density (BMD), leading to the susceptibility to fractures [1]. OP has high morbidity especially in postmenopausal women, and accounts for about 80% of all fractures in clinic that principally threatens the life quality and increases disability, premature mortality and financial burden [2, 3]. Despite advances in therapeutics, OP remains an incurable chronic condition [4]. Nevertheless, pharmacological interventions are available, and it is still urgently to deeply understand the pathogenesis of OP to develop effective methods.

As a kind of noncoding molecules, circular RNAs (circRNAs) possesses a covalent closed-loop structure that lacks 5′–3′ ends, so they are more stability compared with other linear RNAs [5]. Besides that, the regulatory functions of circRNAs in diverse biological processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation and glycolysis, have been identified [6,7,8]. For example, circRNA_0000285 was detected to accelerate cervical cancer cell migration and growth abilities via down-regulating FUS [9]. CircCTNNB1 alleviated cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury by negatively affecting apoptotic, inflammatory and oxidative injury via miR-96-5p/SRB1 axis [10]. Meanwhile, growing proofs have indicated that most circRNAs are differentially expressed in several bone diseases, and broadly participate in osteogenic differentiation and OP pathogenesis [11, 12]. CircRNAs are considered as ideal biomarkers for developing molecular targeting treatment for OP [12]. Circ_0001825 is new-found circRNA originated from ZFAT gene in chr8: 135521861–135545215, through the microarray dataset GSE161361, the expression of circ_0001825 was detect to be decreased in OP samples. However, the functions of circ_0001825 in the pathogenesis of OP have not yet been reported.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are one kind of undifferentiated cells with multi-linage differentiation capabilities and can differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, or chondrocytes, the senescence of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has a significant role during the pathogenesis of OP [13]. Herein, this study used human-derived MSCs (hMSCs) to investigate the role of circ_0001825 in osteogenic differentiation. Moreover, some circRNAs can function as microRNA (miRNA) sponges to modulate the biological functions and expression profile of the downstream genes [14, 15]. Thus, the potential miRNA/mRNA axis of circ_0001825 in hMSCs was also explored.

Material and methods

Clinical samples

Bone marrow samples were collected from trauma patients (27 postmenopausal OP patients and 23 age- and gender-matched postmenopausal women without OP (Control)) in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Taizhou Central Hospital. The OP patients were diagnosed based on the World Health Organizations diagnostic criteria [16]. All samples were preserved at − 80 °C for analysis. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Taizhou Central Hospital. It was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. It has obtained the informed consents from all individuals.

Cell culture and differentiation

Human-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) was obtained from American Tissue Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and cultured in growth medium (ATCC) containing hMSC basal medium, 1% penicillin–streptomycin and fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C with 5% CO2. For the induction of osteogenesis, hMSCs were maintained in differentiation medium consisting of DMEM low glucose medium, 10 mM β-glycerol phosphate, 50 ng/ml L-ascorbic acid, 0.1 µM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 10% FBS for up to 14 days. The medium is renewed every 3 days.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

The TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was adopted to extract total RNAs. The synthesis of cDNA was conducted by reverse transcription using Prime Script RT Reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China), and the amplification reaction was performed using SYBR Green kit (Takara) through qRT-PCR analysis. GAPDH or U6 was used as the control and the relative folds changes were calculated by 2–ΔΔCt method. Primers were shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers sequences used in this study

RNase R and actinomycin D assay

For the stability analysis of circ_0001825, about 3 µg isolated RNAs were used to incubate with RNase R (5 U/μg) or Mock for 20 min at 37 °C, and the resulting RNA was collected qRT-PCR analysis.

In addition, hMSCs were treated with 2 μg/ml Actinomycin D for indicated times, then RNAs were isolated from cells and the contents of circular and linear RNAs were tested using qRT-PCR.

Cell transfection

Two specific short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) targeting circ_0001825 (sh-circ_0001825#1 and sh-circ_0001825#2), and miR-1270 mimics or inhibitor (miR-1270 or anti-miR-1270) were constructed by Genema (Shanghai, China) with nontraget shRNA (sh-NC), miR-NC or anti-miR-NC as the contrasts. The full-length of circ_0001825 or SMAD5 was cloned into pCD5-ciR or pcDNA3.1 plasmids (Genema) to establish overexpression vectors with empty plasmids as the control (pCD5-ciR or pcDNA). Then Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) was applied to conduct transient transfection.

Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

hMSCs were planted in 96-well plates, and incubated for 24, 48 or 72 h. Then 10 μL CCK-8 solution (Beyotime, Beijing, China) was supplemented into each well for an additional 2 h-incubation. Finally, the absorbance at 450 nm was assessed by a microplate reader.

Flow cytometry

hMSCs were harvested and washed by PBS, then cells were suspended in binding buffer (400 μL) containing 10 µL Annexin V-FITC and 5 µL PI. After incubation for 15 min in darkness, apoptosis cells were examined by a flow cytometry.

Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and activity detection

hMSCs were immobilized with 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma) for 15 min. After being centrifuged at 14,000×g for 5 min, cell supernatant were collected and then dyed with ALP colorimetric assay kit (BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA). Finally, the absorbance at 405 nm was assessed by a microplate reader to calculate the activity of ALP. In addition, histochemical ALP staining were conducted as per the protocol of a commercial ALP staining Kit (GeFan Biotech, shanghai, China) with the supernatant.

Alizarin red staining

hMSCs were harvested and washed by 1X PBS for twice, followed by being fixed in 10% formalin for 20 min. Next, cells were dyed with 1 mL 0.5% alizarin red staining solution for 15 min at indoor temperature. Following washing with distilled water for 5 min, cells were transferred to slides, and red mineralized nodules were observed and analyzed using a microscope at 572 nm.

Western blotting

Total proteins were isolated and separated by 10% SDS-PAGE gels. The proteins were then shifted onto PVDF membranes (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Then the primary antibodies against osteopontin (OPN; ab8448), osteocalcin (OCN; ab93876), SMAD5 (ab40771) and GAPDH (ab8245) were used to incubate with the membranes all night at 4 °C, followed by secondary incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at 37 °C. All antibodies were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Proteins were observed using the ECL procedure (Millipore).

Dual-luciferase reporter assay

The fragments of miR-1270 on circ_0001825 and SMAD5 CDS region were amplified and inserted into the pMIR-reporter (Promega, Beijing, China) to establish wild-type (WT) vectors (WT-circ_0001825 or WT-SMAD5 CDS). Then the mutation (MUT) sites of seed sequence was designed, and MUT-circ_0001825 or MUT-SMAD5 CDS vector was established. Then the 200 ng recombinant vectors and 50 nM miR-1270 or miR-NC were transfected into hMSCs, and the luciferase activity levels were determined after 48 h.

Pull-down assay

Biotinylated miR-1270 (bio-miR-1270) or the control (bio-miR-NC) was designed and established, and then incubated with 2 μg cell lysate of hMSCs. Then the mixture was reacted with 100 μL Streptavidin C1 magnetic beads (Invitrogen) for 1 h. Finally, the enrichments of circ_0001825 and SMAD5 were tested by qRT-PCR.

Statistical analyses

The results were manifested as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Group comparison was conducted by analysis of variance in multiple groups, or Student’s t test in two groups. GraphPad Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, United States) were used for statistical analysis. P < 0.05 indicated significant differences.

Results

Circ_0001825 was lowly expressed in OP patients and osteogenic induced hMSCs

Through the microarray dataset GSE161361 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/?acc=GSE161361), the expression of circ_0001825 was identified to be down-regulated in OP samples (3 pairs of OP and matched normal tissues) (Fig. 1a, b). Then the expression profile of circ_0001825 in clinical samples of OP was evaluated. As exhibited in Fig. 1c, circ_0001825 was lowly expressed in the bone marrow samples of OP patients relative to the normal control. Next, it was discovered that RNase R treatment could digest linear GAPDH but not affect circ_0001825 in hMSCs (Fig. 1d). Further actinomycin D treatment also showed that circ_0001825 was stable relative to linear GAPDH mRNA (Fig. 1e), indicating the cyclization characteristics of circ_0001825. Besides that, qRT-PCR analysis showed that circ_0001825 level was increased in hMSCs incubated under osteogenic medium (OM) than that in cell incubated with growth medium (GM) (Fig. 1f). These data suggested that down-regulated circ_0001825 might be associated with OP progression by affecting osteogenic differentiation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Circ_0001825 was lowly expressed in OP patients and osteogenic induced hMSCs. a, b Circ_0001825 was lowly expressed in OP patients as compared to normal control in GSE161361 database. c qRT-PCR analysis of circ_0001825 expression in bone marrow samples of OP patients and normal contrasts. d, e Cyclization validation of circ_0001825 by RNase R and actinomycin D treatment. f qRT-PCR analysis of circ_0001825 expression in hMSCs incubated with osteogenic medium (OM) or growth medium (GM). *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001

Circ_0001825 knockdown suppressed viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs

To validate the function of circ_0001825 in OP. Loss-of-function assay [17, 18] was conducted by using circ_0001825 specific shRNAs (sh-circ_0001825#1 and sh-circ_0001825#2). hMSCs at 14 days of osteogenic induction were exposed to assigned transfection. qRT-PCR analysis showed both sh-circ_0001825#1 and sh-circ_0001825#2 transfection markedly decreased circ_0001825 expression in hMSCs compared with sh-NC introduction (Fig. 2a). Functionally, deficiency of circ_0001825 suppressed cell viability (Fig. 2b) and induced apoptosis (Fig. 2c) in hMSCs. In addition, circ_0001825 deletion weakened the activity of ALP in hMSCs (Fig. 2d and Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Furthermore, alizarin red staining exhibited that calcium deposition was increased in sh-circ_0001825 group compared with corresponding controls (Fig. 2e and Additional file 1: Fig. S1B). Besides that, western blotting showed the decreases of osteogenesis-related markers (OCN and OPN) in hMSCs at protein levels (Fig. 2f). In all, circ_0001825 knockdown suppressed viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Circ_0001825 knockdown suppressed viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs. a–f hMSCs at 14 days of osteogenic induction were transfected with sh-NC or sh-circ_0001825 (sh-circ_0001825#1 and sh-circ_0001825#2). a qRT-PCR analysis for circ_0001825 content. b CCK-8 assay for cell viability. c Flow cytometry for cell apoptosis. d–f Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by ALP activity, or Alizarin Red staining and the detection of osteogenesis-related markers (OCN and OPN). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

Circ_0001825 overexpression promoted viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs

Next, gain-of-function assay was performed. hMSCs subjected to osteogenic induction for 14 d, and then transfected with circ_0001825 overexpression plasmids and empty plasmids. As expected, circ_0001825 level was markedly elevated after circ_0001825 plasmids introduction (Fig. 3a). Thereafter, we discovered that circ_0001825 overexpression led to the promotion of cell viability (Fig. 3b). Moreover, ALP activity and calcium deposition were increased after circ_0001825 overexpression (Fig. 3c, d). Also, circ_0001825 overexpression enhanced the protein levels of OCN and OPN in hMSCs (Fig. 3e). Thus, circ_0001825 contributed to hMSC viability and osteogenic differentiation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Circ_0001825 overexpression promoted viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs. a–e hMSCs at 14 days of osteogenic induction were transfected with circ_0001825 or pCD5-ciR. a qRT-PCR analysis for circ_0001825 content. b CCK-8 assay for cell viability. c–e Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by ALP activity, or Alizarin Red staining and the detection of osteogenesis-related markers (OCN and OPN). **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

MiR-1270 was a target of circ_0001825

Subsequently, the underlying targets of circ_0001825 were investigated. Three databases (Starbase2.0, circBank and Circinteractome) were used to predict the potential target miRNAs, among which 2 miRNAs (miR-1270 and miR-1287-5p) were selected from the overlap between the databases (Fig. 4a). Meanwhile, it was found that circ_0001825 knockdown led to significant elevation of miR-1270 levels in hMSCs, but did not affect miR-1287-5p expression in cells (Fig. 4b). Thus, miR-1270 might be a target of circ_0001825. Figure 4c showed the binding sites of miR-1270 on circ_0001825. After confirming the overexpression efficiency of miR-1270 mimic (Fig. 4d), dual-luciferase reporter assay was carried out. The results showed that miR-1270 up-regulation markedly weakened the luciferase activity in WT-circ_0001825 group, but not the MUT-circ_0001825 group in hMSCs (Fig. 4e). Furthermore, pull-down assay suggested that circ_0001825 was notably captured by biotinylated miR-1270 compared with the control in hMSCs (Fig. 4f). In addition, miR-1270 was highly expressed in the bone marrow samples of OP patients relative to the normal control (Fig. 4g), and was negatively correlated with circ_0001825 expression (Fig. 4h). Moreover, miR-1270 level was decreased in hMSCs incubated with OM than that in cell incubated with GM (Fig. 4i). Collectively, circ_0001825 directly targeted miR-1270.

Fig. 4
figure 4

MiR-1270 was a target of circ_0001825. a Schematic illustration exhibiting overlapping of the target miRNAs of circ_0001825 predicted by Starbase2.0, circBank and Circinteractome databases. b qRT-PCR analysis for the expression of miR-1270 and miR-1287-5p in hMSCs transfected with sh-NC or sh-circ_0001825. c The binding sites of miR-1270 on circ_0001825. d Transfection efficiency detection by qRT-PCR. e, f The interaction analysis between miR-1270 and circ_0001825 by dual-luciferase reporter assay and pull-down assay. g qRT-PCR analysis of miR-1270 expression in bone marrow samples of OP patients and normal contrasts. h Correlation analysis between miR-1270 and circ_0001825 expression in OP samples. i qRT-PCR analysis of miR-1270 expression in hMSCs incubated with OM or GM. **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001

Circ_0001825 regulated the viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs via miR-1270

To further study whether miR-1270 was a functional target of circ_0001825, hMSCs were transfected with sh-circ_0001825 (sh-circ_0001825#1) alone or sh-circ_0001825 together with miR-1270 inhibitor (anti-miR-1270) after osteogenic induction. qRT-PCR analysis showed anti-miR-1270 introduction reversed sh-circ_0001825-induced increase of miR-1270 level in hMSCs (Fig. 5a). Then we found the inhibition of cell viability and enhancement of cell apoptosis mediated by sh-circ_0001825 were rescued by anti-miR-1270 introduction (Fig. 5b, c). Moreover, miR-1270 inhibition abolished sh-circ_0001825-caused inhibition on osteogenic differentiation, evidenced by reduced ALP activity, calcium deposition, and protein levels of OCN and OPN in hMSCs (Fig. 5d–f). Altogether, circ_0001825 promoted hMSC viability and osteogenic differentiation via miR-1270.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Circ_0001825 regulated the viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs via miR-1270. a–f hMSCs were transfected with sh-circ_0001825 alone or sh-circ_0001825 together with anti-miR-1270 after osteogenic induction. a qRT-PCR analysis for circ_0001825 content. b CCK-8 assay for cell viability. c Flow cytometry for cell apoptosis. d–f Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by ALP activity, or Alizarin Red staining and the detection of osteogenesis-related markers (OCN and OPN). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001

SMAD5 was a target of miR-1270

Then we further explored the targets of miR-1270. Through the prediction of starBase v2.0 database, miR-1270 was found to have binding sites on SMAD5 (Fig. 6a). Dual-luciferase reporter assay showed that miR-1270 mimic markedly weakened the luciferase activity of WT-SMAD5 CDS, and did not affect the luciferase activity of MUT-SMAD5 CDS in hMSCs (Fig. 6b). Also, pull-down assay also confirmed the binding between miR-1270 and SMAD5 (Fig. 6c). The mRNA level of SMAD5 was decreased in OP samples (Fig. 6d), which was negatively correlated with miR-1270 expression (Fig. 6e). Similarly, the protein levels of SMAD5 also showed decreasing trend in OP patients (Fig. 6f). Importantly, OM maintain led to an increase of SMAD5 expression level compared with GM culture (Fig. 6g). These data verified miR-1270 targeted SMAD5.

Fig. 6
figure 6

SMAD5 was a target of miR-1270. a The binding sites of miR-1270 on SMAD5. b, c The interaction analysis between miR-1270 and SMAD5 by dual-luciferase reporter assay and pull-down assay. d qRT-PCR analysis of SMAD5 expression in bone marrow samples of OP patients and normal contrasts. e Correlation analysis between miR-1270 and SMAD5 expression in OP samples. f Western blotting analysis of SMAD5 expression in bone marrow samples of OP patients and normal contrasts. g qRT-PCR analysis of SMAD5 expression in hMSCs incubated with OM or GM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001

MiR-1270 suppressed the viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs via SMAD5

Thereafter, the potential functions of miR-1270/SMAD5 axis on OP were explored. hMSCs were transfected with miR-1270 alone or miR-1270 together with SMAD5 after osteogenic induction. Western blotting analysis showed that miR-1270 mimic resulted in a decrease of SMAD5 level, which was rescued by SMAD5 plasmids transfection (Fig. 7a). Functionally, miR-1270 mimic suppressed the viability and induced apoptosis in hMSCs, while these effects were abated by SMAD5 up-regulation (Fig. 7b, c). Besides that, miR-1270 mimic weakened osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs, reflected by decreased ALP activity, calcium deposition, and protein levels of OCN and OPN in hMSCs, while SMAD5 plasmids transfection counteracted the effects mediated by miR-1270 mimic (Fig. 7d–f). In short, miR-1270 suppressed the viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs via SMAD5.

Fig. 7
figure 7

MiR-1270 suppressed the viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs via SMAD5. a–f hMSCs were transfected with miR-1270 alone or miR-1270 together with SMAD5 after osteogenic induction. a Western blotting analysis for SMAD5 content. b CCK-8 assay for cell viability. c Flow cytometry for cell apoptosis. d–f Osteogenic differentiation was evaluated by ALP activity, or Alizarin Red staining and the detection of osteogenesis-related markers (OCN and OPN). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001

Circ_0001825/miR-1270/SMAD5 formed a feedback loop

As shown in Fig. 8a, b, circ_0001825 silencing was accompanied with decreased SMAD5 level, which was rescued by following miR-1270 inhibition in hMSCs. Moreover, the level of SMAD5 was elevated by circ_0001825 overexpression, and then reduced in response to following miR-1270 mimic addition (Fig. 8c, d). Therefore, there was a circ_0001825/miR-1270/SMAD5 axis in hMSCs.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Circ_0001825/miR-1270/SMAD5 formed a feedback loop. a–d qRT-PCR and western blotting were used to evaluate the effects of circ_0001825/miR-1270 axis on the expression change of SMAD5. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001

Discussion

Currently, drug-based agents that induce osteogenesis or suppress bone resorption remain the mainstream therapy for OP, whereas, they are not able to reverse the loss of existing bones and may also result in side effects such as cancer, osteonecrosis of the jaw, or thromboembolic events [19, 20]. Therefore, exploring alternative therapeutic strategies for OP are urgent. Currently, the study on molecularly targeted therapy have attracted great research interest. CircRNAs have been considered as ideal biomarkers for developing molecule-based therapeutics due to their high stability and tissue- or cell type-specific expression [21]. Moreover, a large number of circRNAs have been reported to modulate osteoblast differentiation, thereby affecting OP progression. For example, circRNA_0048211 and circ_0001795 induced osteoblastic differentiation in hMSCs to attenuate OP progression [22, 23]. However, hsa_circ_0006859 was confirmed to stimulate adipogenesis and inhibit osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs [24]. In addition, circRNA_28313 deficiency suppressed osteoclast differentiation in bone marrow monocyte/macrophage cells and impaired bone resorption in vivo [25]. Herein, we found circ_0001825 was lowly expressed in OP patients and osteogenic-induced hMSCs. Functionally, circ_0001825 overexpression promoted hMSC visibility and weakened cell apoptosis. Moreover, circ_0001825 up-regulation in hMSCs elevated the expression of osteogenesis-associated genes and induced mineralization ability and ALP activity. While circ_0001825 deficiency showed opposite effects. Therefore, circ_0001825 may be a potential biomarker for regulating postmenopausal OP.

In a further mechanical analysis, the miRNA/mRNA axis underlying circ_0001825 in hMSCs was identified based on the ceRNA hypothesis [14, 15], and the circ_0001825/miR-1270/SMAD5 axis was first identified. MiRNAs are broadly expressed and powerful regulators of complex processes, accumulating evidence has identified the potential of miRNAs in the therapeutics of many diseases [26, 27]. A previous study exhibited that miR-1270 was overexpressed in circulating monocytes of postmenopausal OP patients and was associated with bone remodeling genes [28]. Besides that, Eric Gustavo’s team showed that miR-1270 attenuated the proliferation and mobility of osteoblastic cell lines, implying the association between miR-1270 and bone metabolism [29]. In our work, OP patients and osteogenic-induced hMSCs also showed high expression of miR-1270. Overexpression of miR-1270 in hMSCs suppressed the viability and osteogenesis in cells. Moreover, miR-1270 silencing abated the suppressing effects of circ_0001825 deficiency on osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs. SMAD5 is a member of the receptor-activated Smad that act as critical signal transducers of TGF-β-related signaling [30]. SMAD5-mediated signals govern osteogenesis through the comprehensive interactions with RUNX2, SIP1 and Rob [31]. Yan et al. showed that miR-222-3p reduced the levels of SMAD5 and RUNX2, thereby weakening osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs [32]. Wei’s team suggested that SMAD5 inhibition was accompanied with RUNX2 decrease, and then suppressed osteogenic differentiation, which might be related to the miR-21-SMAD5 axis [33]. In our data, we found a decrease of SMAD5 content in OP patients and osteogenic-induced hMSCs. Rescue assay indicated that enforced expression of SMAD5 reversed the suppressing functions of miR-1270 on hMSC viability and osteogenesis.

In all, our data first demonstrated that circ_0001825 contributed to the viability and osteogenic differentiation in hMSCs via activating SMAD5 through sequestering miR-1270, providing a new insight into the development of circRNA-based therapeutics in osteoporosis intervention. In addition, MSC are mesoderm-derived undifferentiated cells, which can alos differentiate into chondrogenic or adipogenic cells under the in vivo or in vitro stimulation. Thus, we will explore interactions of adipogenesis and chondrogenesis with circ_0001825 in the future, and further elaborate the role of circ_0001825 in bone metabolic diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ensrud KE, Crandall CJ. Osteoporosis. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:306–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bessette L, Ste-Marie LG, Jean S, Davison KS, Beaulieu M, Baranci M, et al. The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2008;19:79–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JP, Adachi JD, Schemitsch E, Tarride JE, Brown V, Bell A, et al. Mortality in older adults following a fragility fracture: real-world retrospective matched-cohort study in Ontario. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JP. Long-Term Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021;36:544–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu CX, Li X, Nan F, Jiang S, Gao X, Guo SK, et al. Structure and degradation of circular RNAs regulate PKR activation in innate immunity. Cell. 2019;177:865-80.e21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kristensen LS, Andersen MS, Stagsted LVW, Ebbesen KK, Hansen TB, Kjems J. The biogenesis, biology and characterization of circular RNAs. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:675–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu J, Qi X, Liu L, Hu X, Liu J, Yang J, et al. Emerging epigenetic regulation of circular RNAs in human cancer. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;16:589–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marques-Rocha JL, Samblas M, Milagro FI, Bressan J, Martínez JA, Marti A. Noncoding RNAs, cytokines, and inflammation-related diseases. FASEB J. 2015;29:3595–611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen RX, Liu HL, Yang LL, Kang FH, Xin LP, Huang LR, et al. Circular RNA circRNA_0000285 promotes cervical cancer development by regulating FUS. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:8771–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen C, Chang X, Zhang S, Zhao Q, Lei C. CircRNA CTNNB1 (circCTNNB1) ameliorates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury by sponging miR-96-5p to up-regulate scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SRB1) expression. Bioengineered. 2022;13:10258–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao M, Zhang Z, Sun J, Li B, Li Y. The roles of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA networks in the development and treatment of osteoporosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022;13:945310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang W, Wu Y, Qiao M, Xie Z, Cen X, Huang X, et al. CircRNA-miRNA networks in regulating bone disease. J Cell Physiol. 2022;237:1225–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang Y, Zhang P, Zhang X, Lv L, Zhou Y. Advances in mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for the treatment of osteoporosis. Cell Prolif. 2021;54:e12956.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP. A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 2011;146:353–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495:384–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kanis JA, Melton LJ 3rd, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gargano G, Oliva F, Oliviero A, Maffulli N. Small interfering RNAs in the management of human rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med Bull. 2022;142:34–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Gargano G, Oliviero A, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Small interfering RNAs in tendon homeostasis. Br Med Bull. 2021;138:58–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu L, Webster TJ. In situ sensor advancements for osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016;14:386–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li H, Xiao Z, Quarles LD, Li W. Osteoporosis: mechanism, molecular target and current status on drug development. Curr Med Chem. 2021;28:1489–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. He AT, Liu J, Li F, Yang BB. Targeting circular RNAs as a therapeutic approach: current strategies and challenges. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021;6:185.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Qiao L, Li CG, Liu D. CircRNA_0048211 protects postmenopausal osteoporosis through targeting miRNA-93-5p to regulate BMP2. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:3459–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li M, Li C, Zheng H, Zhou Z, Yang W, Gong Y, et al. CircRNA_0001795 sponges miRNA-339-5p to regulate yes-associated protein 1 expression and attenuate osteoporosis progression. Bioengineered. 2022;13:2803–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhi F, Ding Y, Wang R, Yang Y, Luo K, Hua F. Exosomal hsa_circ_0006859 is a potential biomarker for postmenopausal osteoporosis and enhances adipogenic versus osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by sponging miR-431-5p. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13:381.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen X, Ouyang Z, Shen Y, Liu B, Zhang Q, Wan L, et al. CircRNA_28313/miR-195a/CSF1 axis modulates osteoclast differentiation to affect OVX-induced bone absorption in mice. RNA Biol. 2019;16:1249–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Oliviero A, Della Porta G, Peretti GM, Maffulli N. MicroRNA in osteoarthritis: physiopathology, diagnosis and therapeutic challenge. Br Med Bull. 2019;130:137–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Giordano L, Porta GD, Peretti GM, Maffulli N. Therapeutic potential of microRNA in tendon injuries. Br Med Bull. 2020;133:79–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jiménez-Ortega RF, Ramírez-Salazar EG, Parra-Torres AY, Muñoz-Montero SA, Rangel-Escareňo C, Salido-Guadarrama I, et al. Identification of microRNAs in human circulating monocytes of postmenopausal osteoporotic Mexican-Mestizo women: a pilot study. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14:5464–72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramírez-Salazar EG, Almeraya EV, López-Perez TV, Jiménez-Salas Z, Patiño N, Velázquez-Cruz R. MicroRNA-1270 inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and invasion via targeting IRF8 in osteoblast-like cell lines. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2022;44:1182–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Orlowski J. SMAD5 signaling: more than meets the nuclei. Cell Res. 2017;27:1075–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu B, Mao N. Smad5: signaling roles in hematopoiesis and osteogenesis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:766–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yan J, Guo D, Yang S, Sun H, Wu B, Zhou D. Inhibition of miR-222-3p activity promoted osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs by regulating Smad5-RUNX2 signal axis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;470:498–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wei F, Yang S, Guo Q, Zhang X, Ren D, Lv T, et al. MicroRNA-21 regulates osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells by targeting Smad5. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16608.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82070904).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CZ and LD performed experiments and wrote the manuscript. ZX and ZZ collected and analyzed the data. MF and FZ contributed the methodology and edited the manuscript. CS conceived and designed research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang She.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. It has obtained the informed consents from all individuals.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1

. Related to Fig. 2

Additional file 2: Fig. S2

. Related to Fig. 3

Additional file 3: Fig. S3

. Related to Fig. 5

Additional file 4: Fig. S4

. Related to Fig. 7. The gross appearance of ALP and Alizarin Red staining by naked eyes. (A) ALP staining. (B) Alizarin Red staining.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, C., Ding, L., Xiang, Z. et al. Circ_0001825 promotes osteogenic differentiation in human-derived mesenchymal stem cells via miR-1270/SMAD5 axis. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 663 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04133-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04133-5

Keywords