Skip to main content
Download PDF

Staged osteotomy in lateral position for the treatment of severe kyphotic deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 18, Article number: 417 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Patients with severe kyphotic deformity (Cobb > 100°) secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) occasionally cannot undergo corrective surgery in the prone position. Osteotomy in the lateral position might provide a possible solution. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of staged osteotomy in the lateral position for the treatment of AS-related severe kyphosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

Methods

In total, 23 patients who underwent staged osteotomy in the lateral position from October 2015 to June 2017 were analyzed. In the first stage of surgery, all but one patient underwent a single-level Ponte osteotomy, which was followed by a pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the second stage. Mean follow-up was 30.8 ± 4.6 months. Global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), osteotomized vertebra intervertebral angle (OVI), chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire (SRS-22) were all compared pre- and postoperation.

Results

All kyphosis parameters were significantly improved (all P < 0.05). GK was corrected from 115.0 ± 13.4° to 46.5 ± 9.0° postoperatively, with a mean correction of 68.5°. SVA was improved from 21.2 ± 5.1 cm to 5.1 ± 1.8 cm postoperatively. After surgery, CBVA was adjusted from 64.1 ± 23.2° to 5.7 ± 10.6° and OVI was changed from 9.0 ± 2.7° to − 20.1 ± 5.6°. Both the ODI and SRS-22 showed substantial improvements (all P < 0.05). Four patients with mild complications were observed perioperatively.

Conclusion

In AS patients with severe kyphosis, satisfactory correction can be safely achieved with staged osteotomy in the lateral position, which can not only correct the sagittal imbalance of the spine with acceptable complications but also facilitate the placement of the intraoperative position.

Background

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic non-specific inflammatory disease involving fibro-osseous tissues[1, 2]. Advanced AS patients often suffer from severe rigid thoracolumbar kyphosis (Cobb > 100°), resulting in sagittal-plane imbalance, atypical appearance and limited horizontal visual fields. In more severe cases, cardiopulmonary and digestive functions may also be impaired due to the compression of thoracic and abdominal viscera [3,4,5,6]. Corrective osteotomy is the only effective treatment for AS patients with kyphosis. A variety of osteotomies have been reported for kyphosis correction, including Smith-Peterson osteotomy (SPO), Ponte osteotomy (PO), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column resection (VCR) [7,8,9]. SPO is a posterior chevron-shaped osteotomy that obtains 10° correction with a single level [7, 10]. Ponte osteotomy and SPO are often mistakenly used in scientific literature. The key distinctions between these two osteotomies lie in Schwab's Osteotomy Classification and the extent of resection. Ponte osteotomy necessitates adequate laminae resection to rectify thoracolumbar kyphosis by significantly shortening the posterior column [11]. PSO is a closing wedge osteotomy that does not lengthen the anterior column and accomplishes a correction of approximately 30° to 40°. The aforementioned osteotomies are all based on the prone position; however, positioning AS patients with severe kyphosis in the prone position can be challenging, even with the aid of a specially designed folding bed. One-stage two-level PSO has been reported as an effective treatment for these patients. Nonetheless, this procedure is technically demanding for surgeons and anesthetists, potentially resulting in more intraoperative bleeding and a higher incidence of neurological complications [12,13,14]. In order to reduce the technical complexity of correcting severe kyphosis in AS patients and to address the issue of intraoperative position setting, staged osteotomy in the lateral position was initially proposed for the treatment of severe kyphotic deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis.

Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of staged osteotomy in the lateral position for the treatment of AS-related severe kyphosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

Methods

Patients

A retrospective analysis was conducted on AS patients with severe kyphotic deformity who underwent staged osteotomy in the lateral position from October 2015 to June 2017. AS was diagnosed according to the modified New York standards proposed in 1984 [15]. Indications for corrective surgery encompassed severe kyphotic appearance, difficulty in forward gazing, limitations in daily living and impairment of cardiopulmonary function. Inclusion criteria included: (1) AS patient with a Cobb angle of thoracolumbar kyphosis > 100°; (2) staged osteotomy performed in the lateral position; (3) a minimum follow-up of 2 years with complete clinical data. Exclusion criteria were: (1) previous history of spinal surgery; (2) severe concomitant diseases, such as spinal tumors or infections. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third People's Hospital of Chengdu.

The study involved 23 patients (20 males and 3 females) with a mean age of 43.5 ± 9.5 years (range 29–67 years). The follow-up endpoint was in November 2019, with an average follow-up time of 30.8 ± 4.6 months (range 25–40).

No patients exhibited neurological deficits prior to surgery. According to the 2005 ATS/ERS pulmonary function classification standard [16], all but one patient demonstrated poor lung function. Table 1 summarizes the findings of the patient characteristics in this study.

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Full size table

Radiographic and clinical assessment

Radiologic and clinical parameter data were collected and evaluated for patients preoperatively, postoperatively and at last follow-up. A senior spine surgeon, not involved in the surgery, measured these parameters. Each parameter was measured three times and averaged. All radiographic measurements were taken on standing full-length spine lateral radiographs by an independent spine surgeon, which included: (1) global kyphosis (GK): defined as the angle between the maximally tilted upper and lower endplate of the vertebral body; (2) thoracic kyphosis (TK): the angle between the superior endplate of T5 and the inferior endplate of T12; (3) lumbar lordosis (LL): the angle between the upper endplate of T12 and S1; a positive value for the aforementioned angle indicated kyphosis; (4) sagittal vertical axis (SVA): the distance between the C7 plumb line and the posterosuperior corner of S1, which is positive if the C7 plumb line was anterior to the posterosuperior corner of S1 [17].

During the first stage, 22 patients underwent a single-level Ponte osteotomy in the lateral position. The correction result of the first-stage surgery was assessed by the osteotomized vertebra intervertebral angle (OVI), with positive values indicating kyphosis (Fig. 1A, B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pre- and postoperative radiographic parameter measurements diagrams (A, B)

Full size image

Chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) was measured using standing lateral photographs of patients, defined as the angle between a line from the chin to the brow and its plumb line [18].

Clinical efficacy assessments included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire (SRS-22) [19, 20].

Surgical technique

(1) In the first stage of lateral osteotomy, all patients underwent a single-level Ponte osteotomy, with the exception of one patient who required L1 PSO due to extremely severe kyphosis. Following general anesthesia, patients were positioned laterally on a customized foam pad that offered ample support for the head, thorax, hip and lateral lower extremity and subsequently secured with medical tape (Fig. 2A, B). The posterior components were exposed as far as the transverse process (Fig. 2C). Bilateral pedicle screws were implanted. As the screws were inserted in the lateral position, the inherent habit of screw instrumentation in the prone position needed to be altered. A unilateral temporary rod was placed to prevent uncontrolled sagittal translation during the osteotomy. The Ponte osteotomy was then performed from pedicle to pedicle [11]. The correction was achieved by gradually closing the osteotomy gap through slowly pushing back on the anterior thigh and simultaneously applying pressure on the osteotomy site (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Lateral position placement (A, B). First-stage L3/4 Ponte osteotomy in lateral position pre- and postosteotomy procedure (C, D). Second-stage L1 PSO in prone position (E, F). Red arrows demonstrate the correction process accomplished by slowly pushing the front of the thigh backward and pressing the osteotomy site simultaneously. White arrows indicate the closed osteotomy gap

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Illustration of Ponte osteotomy from pedicle to pedicle. The ideal osteotomy region (A–D). A unilateral temporary rod was installed after screw instrumentation; white dotted lines display the actual region of Ponte osteotomy, approximately a quadrangle shape (E). White arrows indicate the closed osteotomy gap after PO (F)

Full size image

(2) The second-stage PSO, based on Wang's method [21], was conducted two weeks after the first-stage surgery. All patients, except one, underwent the second-stage procedure in the prone position. The corresponding author performed all surgeries under multimodal neuroelectrophysiology monitoring (Fig. 2E, F).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 18.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). All measurements were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA was utilized to compare data for GK, TK, LL, OVA, SVA, CBVA, ODI and SRS-22 scores preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow-up. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05.

Results

Surgical results

All patients exhibited significant improvement in stooped and downward-looking posture after surgery. Table 2 summarizes the surgical characteristics findings. The average operation interval between the primary and secondary surgery was (23.5 ± 6.8) days.

Table 2 Surgical characteristics
Full size table

In the first stage of surgery, 16 patients (72.7%) underwent L3-4 Ponte osteotomy (Table 2). The mean operative time was (207 ± 34) minutes, and blood loss was (773 ± 247) mL (Table 3).

Table 3 Intraoperative parameters
Full size table

In the second-stage PSO procedure, the average surgical time was (244 ± 45) minutes, and blood loss was (1189 ± 434) mL (Table 3); PSO level: 15 cases (68.2%) L1. Four patients with pseudarthrosis underwent PSO through pseudarthrosis. One case with L3/4 level pseudarthrosis underwent PSO above the pseudarthrosis. Final fusion: T9-L5 and T9-S1 were the most common fusion segments, with 7 cases each. In this study, the instrumentation range typically encompassed 4 levels above and 3 levels below the osteotomy vertebra (56.5%).

Radiologic and chin brow–vertical angle results

After surgery, all kyphosis parameters significantly improved, and the sagittal balance of the spine was substantially restored (all P < 0.05). No patient showed loss of correction at the last follow-up (all P > 0.05) (Table 4). The preoperative GK was (115.0 ± 13.4)°, which was corrected to (46.5 ± 9.0)° postoperatively and (47.5 ± 8.8)° at the last follow-up, with a mean correction of 68.5° and 67.5°, respectively. The mean SVA improved from (21.2 ± 5.1) cm preoperatively to (5.1 ± 1.8) cm postoperatively, with a mean correction of 16.1 cm.

Table 4 The comparison of sagittal parameters of spine preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up
Full size table

The OVI was (9.0 ± 2.7)° preoperatively, significantly corrected to − (20.1 ± 5.6)° postoperatively and − (19.6 ± 5.7)° at the last follow-up (P < 0.01), with a mean correction of 29.1° and 28.6°, respectively.

The mean CBVA of the patients before surgery was (64.1 ± 23.2)°, which significantly improved to (5.7 ± 10.6)°postoperatively and (6.3 ± 10.7)° at the last follow-up (P < 0.01).

Figure 4 presents a typical case of a 35-year-old "folded patient" with extremely severe kyphosis and hip ankylosis who underwent L1 and L4 PSO in two stages and the final total hip arthroplasty. The GK was corrected from 158° to 62°.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A 35-year-old man with a completely folded spine, who cannot undergo corrective surgery in a prone position. A1–A3 display the first-stage L1 PSO in lateral position; B1–B3 exhibit the second-stage L4 PSO in lateral position. C–F present preoperative, post-first-stage osteotomy, post-second-stage osteotomy and final follow-up radiographs. G–I depict preoperative, immediate postoperative and 31 months postoperative appearances. White arrows indicate osteotomy level

Full size image

Clinical assessment

The mean ODI score of the patients before surgery was 34.7 ± 10.1, which significantly decreased to 15.6 ± 6.6 postoperatively and 15.2 ± 7.0 points at the last follow-up (P < 0.01) (Table 5). After surgery, all patients experienced a significant improvement in quality of life; the four components of the SRS-22 significantly improved after surgery (all P < 0.05; Table 5).

Table 5 The comparison of SRS-22 and ODI score preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up
Full size table

Complications

No neurological deficits, vascular injuries or other severe complications were documented. Furthermore, at the minimum 2-year follow-up, all patients exhibited no occurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) or internal fixation-related complications. Additionally, fusion of the osteotomy was achieved in all patients at the most recent follow-up. In total, four patients with complications were identified among 46 operations in 23 patients (8.7%). In the first stage of surgery, one patient developed a superficial infection that was resolved by increasing the frequency of dressing changes, resulting in a complication incidence of 4.3% (1/23). In the second-stage surgery, three patients experienced postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, which was addressed by prolonging the drainage time with a pressure dressing; the complication incidence for the second-stage surgery was 13.0% (3/23).

Discussion

SPO, PSO, Ponte and VCR are the four corrective osteotomies reported so far for the treatment of AS-related kyphosis, all of which are based on the prone position. However, positioning AS patients with severe kyphosis in the prone position can be challenging, often requiring a specially prepared reverse "V"-shaped folding bed. In some cases, patients cannot undergo corrective surgery in the prone position due to the attachment of the chest and abdomen (Fig. 4). Corrective surgery in the lateral position provides an alternative approach to overcome the difficulty of intraoperative position setting. In this study, only a simple foam pad was required to complete the lateral position without using any special equipment, which would reduce the preoperative preparation time. Regardless of the severity of kyphosis, or even if the patient is "folded," achieving the lateral position remains convenient. During the correction process in the lateral position, an off-table assistant can observe the correction effect more directly from the ventral perspective, aiding in the assessment of whether the correction is excessive or insufficient. Blindness, a frequent consequence during prone spine surgery, can be caused by local extrusion and ischemic optic neuropathy [22]. Qian et al. [23] reported that brachial plexus palsy may occur during prone spinal osteotomy due to local compression and excessive abduction of the shoulder. The absence of local compression in the lateral position allows for the avoidance of postoperative blindness and brachial plexus paralysis.

One-stage two-level PSO is regarded as an effective treatment for severe AS-related kyphosis since it can correct an angle of 100°. However, this method is technically challenging, necessitating a longer operation time and more blood loss, which increases the difficulty and risk of surgery [24, 25]. Zhong et al. [26] reported a mean blood loss of 2560 ± 1109 ml in 10 AS patients with severe kyphosis who were treated with one-stage two-level PSO. Zhang et al. [27] also reported that the mean blood loss was 3311 ± 523 ml in 9 patients with severe kyphotic AS who received a one-stage operation. In this study, the total blood loss in staged osteotomies was 1998 ± 613 ml, which was less than that of the one-stage two-level PSO. Compared to PSO, the Ponte osteotomy performed in the first-stage surgery is less aggressive, results in less blood loss and carries a lower surgical risk. In this study, all patients with severe kyphosis (Cobb angle > 100°) typically cannot tolerate one-stage two-level osteotomies due to poor physical condition and chronic nutritional deficiencies, which adversely affect coagulation and bleeding [28]. With less blood loss, the older age of the patients enrolled in this study was safer during perioperative period. Consequently, staged surgery is believed to be a relatively safe method for treating severe kyphosis in AS patients, reducing the complexity and risk of surgeries.

In this study, GK, TK, LL, SVA and CBVA were utilized to evaluate the sagittal balance of the spine. Our results demonstrated significant improvements in all parameters after surgery and at the last follow-up. Qian et al. [29] investigated the feasibility of using a single-stage skipping two-level PSO in 10 patients with AS-related severe kyphosis (Cobb > 100°). Their results showed that GK, LL and SVA were corrected from 113.4°, 41.9° and 25.2 cm preoperatively to 71.6°, − 44.1° and 5.8 cm postoperatively. Zhong et al. [26] reported improvements in the kyphosis angle, CBVA and SVA from 92.0°, 37.6° and 24.1 cm preoperatively to 30.0°, − 0.6° and 7.5 cm postoperatively. In the current study, the kyphosis angle was corrected from 115.0° to 46.5° postoperatively, with a mean correction of 68.5°, which was similar to previous studies. Although the Ponte osteotomy performed in the lateral surgery was a Grade 2 osteotomy, it achieved a mean correction of 29.1°. The correction angle was almost equal to the PSO procedure. This might be attributed to the extension of the laminae resection range from pedicle to pedicle, providing an adequate osteotomy gap. Correction is primarily achieved by shortening the posterior column and elongating the anterior column. The wider the osteotomy gap, the greater the correction angle. Unfortunately, this procedure has been associated with elongation of the aorta, and as a result, patients with severe kyphosis undergoing Ponte osteotomy may be subject to aortic injury [30]. However, no severe vascular injury was recorded in this study. This might be due to the absence of abdominal aorta calcification on preoperative CT angiography in all cases, allowing the elastic aorta to adapt well to the spine's elongation during the correction procedure. In our experience, the osteotomy width of the Ponte osteotomy is safe within 25 mm. The degree of kyphosis correction was found to be positively correlated with the extent of aortic lengthening, suggesting that aortic injury was more likely to occur with the correction of more severe kyphosis deformities. In a study by Ji et al. [31], 21 patients with AS who underwent closing-opening wedge osteotomy (COWO) showed aortic length safely increased by an average of 2.2 cm and proposed that the ratio between the increase in aortic length and the correction angle is 1:19.1. In the present study, a Ponte osteotomy within a 25 mm range was performed, resulting in a correction of 29.1°. This approach elongated the aorta by approximately 1.5 cm at a ratio of 1:19.1, which is deemed safer than COWO surgery. Moreover, a study demonstrated that the mean lumbar lamina length is 26.6 mm [32], and the resection range in the current study covers almost the entire lamina. Within the 25 mm osteotomy range, sufficient correction effects can be achieved without increasing the risk of vascular injury; thus, there is no need to extend the scope of laminae resection. The mean SVA improved from 21.2 to 5.1 cm postoperatively with an average correction of 16.1 cm, which was superior to previous studies. In the study by Diao et al. [33], patients with AS-related kyphosis were divided into lordotic and kyphotic lumbar sagittal profiles based on the morphology of the lumbar spine. They suggested that greater correction of kyphosis could be achieved through osteotomy at the lower lumbar vertebra. Additionally, the lower the osteotomy level, the longer the correction lever arm, allowing for more restoration of SVA and better improvement of sagittal balance. However, selecting an osteotomy level below L4 may result in inadequate distal instrumentation segments, leading to complications such as fixation failure and lumbosacral discomfort [34]. In this study, all patients had kyphotic lumbar sagittal profiles. Therefore, L3/4 was the most frequently selected osteotomy level (69.6%) during the initial stage of surgery, which may account for the superiority of our results.

In this study, 23 patients underwent a total of 46 operations in two stages. The complication rate of the first stage, second stage and total was 4.3%, 13% and 8.7%, respectively, which was lower than the average complication rate (13.4%) for osteotomy reported by Qian et al. [29]. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage was the most common complication due to adhesive lesions between the dura and the ligamentum flavum, the facet or lamina [35].

Limitations

This study also has limitations. The sample size was relatively small. Additionally, retrospective studies have several inherent limitations, such as selection bias and data availability. Sagittal alignment parameters of the spine were evaluated in this study (GK, TK, LL, SVA); however, the spinopelvic alignment parameters (e.g., pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and sacral slope) were not fully assessed due to the low quality of X-ray imaging.

Conclusion

In AS patients with severe kyphosis (Cobb > 100°), satisfactory correction is safely achieved by staged osteotomy in the lateral position. This approach not only corrects the sagittal imbalance of the spine with acceptable complications but also facilitates the placement of the intraoperative position.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials contributing to this article may be provided by sending an e-mail to the first author.

Abbreviations

AS:

Ankylosing spondylitis

GK:

The global kyphosis

TK:

Thoracic kyphosis

LL:

Lumbar lordosis

SVA:

Sagittal vertical axis

OVI:

The osteotomized vertebra intervertebral angle

CBVA:

Chin-brow vertical angle

ODI:

The Oswestry Disability Index

SRS-22:

Score and the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire

SPO:

Smith–Peterson osteotomy

PO:

Ponte osteotomy

PSO:

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy

VCR:

Vertebral column resection

COWO:

Closing-opening wedge osteotomy

References

  1. Qian BP, Wang XH, Qiu Y, et al. The influence of closing-opening wedge osteotomy on sagittal balance in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison with closing wedge osteotomy. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2012;37(16):1415–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’neill KR, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after 3-column osteotomies with 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(5):424–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim KT, Suk KS, Cho YJ, et al. Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Spine. 2002;27:612–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Debarge R, Demey G, Roussouly P. Radiological analysis of ankylosing spondylitis patients with severe kyphosis before and after pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiaer T, Gehrchen M. Transpedicular closed wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: results of surgical treatment and prospective outcome analysis. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qian BP, Qiu Y, Wang B, et al. Pedicle subtraction osteotomy through pseudarthrosis to correct thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in advanced ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(4):711–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang KW, Chen HC, Chen YY, et al. Sagittal translation in opening wedge osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(10):1137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen IH, Chien JT, Yu TC. Transpedicular wedge osteotomy for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis: experience with 78 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(16):E354–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arun R, Dabke HV, Mehdian H. Comparison of three types of lumbar osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis: a case series and evolution of a safe technique for instrumented reduction. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(12):2252–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu ZJ, Qian BP, Qiu Y, et al. Does postoperative PI-LL mismatching affect surgical outcomes in thoracolumbar kyphosis associated with ankylosing spondylitis patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;169:71–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponte A, Orlando G, Siccardi GL. The true ponte osteotomy: by the one who developed it. Spine Deform. 2018;6(1):2–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Debarge R, Demey G, Roussouly P. Sagittal balance analysis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(5):619–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho KJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Comparison of Smith-Peterson versus pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of fixed sagittal imbalance. Spine. 2005;30(18):2030–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu H, Yang C, Zheng Z, et al. Comparison of Smith-Peterson osteotomy and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine. 2015;40(8):570–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Goie HS, Steven MM, van der Linden SM, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis: a comparison of the Rome, New York and modified New York criteria in patients with a positive clinical history screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1985;24:242–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(5):948–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang JC, Qian BP, Qiu Y, et al. What is the optimal postoperative sagittal alignment in ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis following one-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy? Spine J. 2020;20(5):765–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Song K, Su X, Zhang Y, et al. Optimal chin-brow vertical angle for sagittal visual fields in ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(8):2596–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim KT, Park DH, Lee SH, et al. Results of corrective osteotomy and treatment strategy for ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(3):330–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):70–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y. History of spine osteotomy. Spinal Osteotomy. 2015;1(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens WR, Glazer PA, Kelley SD, et al. Ophthalmic complications after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(12):1319–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Qian BP, Qiu Y, Ji ML, et al. Osteotomy for severe thoracolumbar kyphosis in advanced ankylosing spondylitis: skipping two-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013;93(7):491–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu C, Yu W, Zheng G, et al. The safe correction angle of osteotomy at T12 and L1 for ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis: patients with 2-level osteotomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E942–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu H, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Radiologic and clinical outcomes comparison between single- and two-level pedicle subtraction osteotomies in correcting ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. Spine J. 2015;15:290–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhong W, Chen Z, Zeng Y, et al. Two-level osteotomy for the corrective surgery of severe kyphosis from ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective series. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(23):1638–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang HQ, Huang J, Guo CF, et al. Two-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:234–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chunguang Z, Limin L, Yueming S, et al. Two-stage vertebral column resection for severe and rigid scoliosis in patients with low body weight. Spine J. 2013;13:481–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Qian BP, Huang JC, Qiu Y, et al. Complications of spinal osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis in 342 patients: incidence and risk factors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018;30(1):91–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weatherley C, Jaffray D, Terry A. Vascular complications associated with osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: a report of two cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(1):43–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ji ML, Qian BP, Qiu Y, et al. Change of aortic length after closing-opening wedge osteotomy for patients with ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar kyphosis: a computed tomographic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(22):E1361-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kömürcü E, Kaymaz B, Adam G, et al. Safety and feasibility of lumbar spine for intralaminar screw fixation: a computed tomography-based morphometric study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(5):522–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Diao WY, Qian BP, Qiu Y, et al. Does the preoperative lumbar sagittal profile affect the selection of osteotomy level in pedicle subtraction osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018;172:39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Koller H, Koller J, Mayer M, et al. Osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(Suppl 1):S70-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zheng GQ, Song K, Zhang YG, et al. Two level spinal osteotomy for severe thoracolumbar kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Experience with 48 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(13):1055–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the contribution of all patients, their families, the investigators and the medical staff. We are grateful to all authors.

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhengjun Hu and Rui Zhong contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spine Surgery, The Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu, Southwest Jiaotong University, #82 Qinglong Street, Chengdu, 610031, Sichuan, China

    Zhengjun Hu, Rui Zhong, Deng Zhao, Fei Wang, Huaqiang Huang, Dengxu Jiang, Zhong Zhang & Yijian Liang

Authors
  1. Zhengjun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rui Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Deng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Huaqiang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dengxu Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yijian Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZJH and YJL put forward the concept of the study, designed the study and prepared the manuscript. RZ contributed to the data acquisition and statistical analysis. DZ contributed to subsequent data acquisition and data quality control. FW analyzed the image data and interpretation. QHH edited the manuscript and drew the illustrated photograph. XDJ wrote the first draft. ZZ wrote a review and edited it. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yijian Liang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third People’s Hospital of Chengdu of Orthopedics. The patients gave their written informed consent for the study.

Consent for publication

The photographs of the patient involved in the study were approved by the patient with the written informed consent for e-publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, Z., Zhong, R., Zhao, D. et al. Staged osteotomy in lateral position for the treatment of severe kyphotic deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 417 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03884-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03884-5

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X