Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life and accessing rehabilitation services among patients with spinal cord injury and their fear of COVID-19



The unanticipated coronavirus disease (COVID-19) had a negative effect on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and made significant changes in their daily routine. Patients with SCI face additional health risks, especially mental, behavioral, and physical. Without regular physiotherapy sessions, patients' psychological and functional abilities can deteriorate, and complications can occur. There is little information available about the impact of COVID-19 on the quality of life of patients with SCI, and their access to rehabilitation services during the pandemic.


This study was designed to examine the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life of patients with SCI and also their fear of COVID-19. The pandemic’s impact on the accessibility of rehabilitation services and attendance at physiotherapy sessions in one Chinese hospital were also documented.


An observational study based on an online survey.


Outpatients clinic at the rehabilitation department of Wuhan's Tongji Hospital.


People who had been diagnosed with a spinal cord injury (SCI) and who were receiving regular medical monitoring as outpatients at the rehabilitation department were invited to participate in our study (n = 127).


Not applicable.

Outcome measures

A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) designed to measure participants' quality of life before and during the pandemic. Their fear of COVID-19 was quantified using the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S). Demographic and medical status information was extracted from their medical records. Their use of rehabilitation services and attendance at physical therapy sessions was also documented.


Seventy-nine patients with SCI completed the SF-12 and FCV-19 scale. The mental and physical aspects of the participants’ quality of life declined significantly, during the epidemic compared to the pre-epidemic period. More than half of the participants have experienced fear of COVID-19 based on FCV-19S. Most received only irregular physical therapy during routine checkups. Worry about virus transmission was the most common cause cited for not attending regular physical therapy sessions.


The quality of life of these Chinese patients with SCI declined during the pandemic. Most of the participants were shown a high level of fear of COVID-19 and were classified as having an intense fear of COVID-19, in addition to the impact of the pandemic on their access to rehabilitation services and attendance at physical therapy sessions.


In late 2019, the coronavirus COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, China [1]. In March 2020, COVID-19 infection was upgraded to a pandemic because more than 10,000 cases of COVID-19 infection had been detected around the globe. The rapid increase in infection had the potential to deplete essential hospital supplies and overburden health and medical systems [2].

The pandemic affected different aspects of life, such as health and education, and resulted in to suspend of most of the academic institutions where in-person educational activities, including face-to-face teaching and simulation laboratories, have been interrupted along with an interruption of the clinical rotation within the different areas of the same institution [3].

The COVID-19 disease itself and health measures such as quarantine, lockdown, and their subsequent effects such as losing a job, financial difficulties, and impacted daily activities would be expected to have a negative effect on life satisfaction, well-being, and mental health [4].

The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have affected all groups in society due to limited freedom, long periods of loneliness, and family separation, which have detrimental repercussions on the psychological status, mental health, and quality of life (QOL) of the general population [5]. QOL can be defined as "the degree of need and satisfaction within the physical, psychological, social, activity, material, and structural area" of one's life [6]. QOL reflects an individual's level of satisfaction with his or her physical, psychological, and social aspects, as well as the range of challenges they may experience within these domains.

In a survey conducted among Chinese population during the initial period of COVID-19 showed moderate-to-high levels of anxiety, apprehension, and fear associated with low levels of QOL [7]. Another study conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia reported that the COVID-19 pandemic and repeated lockdown measures had significant effects on QOL, especially for those who experienced depression, anxiety, and chronic diseases [8].

Several studies have shown that people with chronic diseases such as spinal cord injury (SCI) are at risk for lower QOL [9]. SCI can cause various complications and comorbidities, making patients experience lower QOL than healthy controls [10,11,12].

Moreover, the repeated closures of the cafes, restaurants, and cinemas, since they are considered contamination sites, have led to the restriction of outdoor activities for those patients as well as many countries with a large number of COVID-19 patients, such as Portugal, New York, and Saudi Arabia, have suspended several healthcare disciplines, like physiotherapy centers and rehabilitation services to reduce the spread of infection among patients [13,14,15]. The need regular physiotherapy sessions and special treatment which became more difficult to access. In Wuhan, for example, many outpatient departments and rehabilitation centers slowed down their activities in response to the social distancing measures designed to minimize transmission of the virus [16]. For individuals with SCI, lack of access to rehabilitation services and physiotherapy outpatient clinics may negatively impact their psychological well-being, QoL, or even their mental health [17]. In contrast, dedicating more time to physical activities and performing therapeutic exercises may enhance well-being and QOL among patients with SCI [18, 19].

Concerns about infection and the rising number of people infected lead to increasing fear of the virus, which in turn leads to increased anxiety, depression, and stress [2, 20]. That there is no credible prediction of how long the epidemic will last contribute to feelings of uncertainty [21]. Recently, several studies have provided evidence confirming these concerns. For example, a survey of 52,730 individuals in China revealed that about one-third had some degree of psychological distress [22].

The high incidence of mortality due to COVID-19 has given rise to a new medical condition: exaggerated fear of COVID-19 [20].

Fear is considered among the pandemic’s most prominent mental health impacts [23]. This may be fear of infection, fear of coming into contact with infected people, fear of transmitting the infection to others, the fear engendered by the repeated emergence of new strains of the virus, or some combination [20, 24].

The pandemic's impacts and psychological stress on people with an SCI have been studied [9, 25, 26], but fears of a pandemic have yet to be evaluated with that group explicitly. In addition, there is not enough research addressing the impact of COVID-19 on the QOL of patients with SCI and their access to rehabilitation services during the pandemic, especially in China.

This observational study was therefore designed to examine the effect of the pandemic on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with SCI and their fear of COVID-19. In addition to investigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to rehabilitation services and attendance at physiotherapy sessions.


Recruitment of participants

Participants were recruited according to the inclusion criteria for the study. This was determined as a confirmed clinical diagnosis of SCI and required admission at the rehabilitation department of Wuhan's Tongji Hospital for rehabilitation intervention before the epidemic. All SCI patients admitted for rehabilitation in Tongji Hospital were invited to participate in this survey study. The exclusion criteria included patients with SCI who did not accept participating in this study and who were not admitted for rehabilitation before the epidemic and anyone aged less than 18 years.

According to the mentioned period, a total of 127 patients were invited to participate, and the response rate was 101 (79.5%). Twenty-two patients were excluded according to exclusion criteria (N = 10 patients aged less than 18 years, and N = 12 patients did not admit for rehabilitation before the pandemic). Finally, only 79 (78.2%) were recruited for this study. From April 15 and May 15, 2021, two nurses collected and documented the data.

Data collection

Before filling out the questionnaire, all the participants got a brief introduction explaining the aim of the research, the procedures, and how the dataset would be used. They were required to answer all of the questions before they could submit their survey, which ensured no missing data. Participation was voluntary and self-selected, and the respondents received no compensation for participating.

Demographic information of the participants and data about their access to rehabilitation services during the epidemic and any history of COVID-19 infection were collected from their medical records.

In addition, data were collected about the respondent's quality of life and fear of the pandemic. The data were gathered between April 15 and May 15, 2021, but the respondents were asked to complete the questionnaire with reference to the period from January 15, 2020 ,to April 15, 2021. From February 1 to April 1, 2020, outpatient rehabilitation services at the hospital had been suspended.

Of particular interest were the number of a respondent's appointments at the rehabilitation department, as well as the causes for those appointments and any irregular follow-up visits. If there were unscheduled visits, the causes were recorded from the chart review of the participants. Whether the subject had gone to the hospital for any cause between January 15, 2020, and April 15, 2021 was carefully recorded. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Quality of life

The respondents' QoL Before and during the pandemic was quantified using a Chinese version of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) [27]. It consists of 12 items and has a mental component summary (MCS) and a physical component summary (PCS) [27].The participants' QoL before the pandemic was with reference to the period between August 20, 2019, and January 15, 2020, while the SF-12 results during the lockdown were with reference to the period between January 15, 2020, and April 15, 2021.

Fear of COVID‑19

A Chinese Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) was used to evaluate the respondents' fear of COVID-19 [28]. This is a short, unidimensional instrument that is simple to implement, easy to understand, and appropriate for all ages and genders. The response to each of the scale's five questions was given on a scale ranging from 1 to 5, giving an overall score ranging between 7 and 35 with higher values indicating more fear. This scale has been translated into several languages besides Chinese [28,29,30,31,32]. The Chinese version has demonstrated good psychometric properties [28].

A COVID-19 fear cutoff point of 16.5 was defined such that scores above that level were categorized as indicating "intense fear" [33].

Statistical analyses

Data analyses were carried out using version 25.0 of the SPSS software suite. The variables were investigated using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. In reporting descriptive statistics, normally distributed continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD), while the non-normally distributed continuous data were presented as the median (25th, 75th percentile). Categorical and nominal variables were presented as frequencies and percentages (%). The responses related to QoL before and during the epidemic were compared using paired-sample t-tests. The Pearson coefficient analysis was computed to analyze the significance of any associations between change in QoL and FVC-19S score. Univariable analysis was computed to analyze the significance of any associations between the characteristics of the patients, access to rehabilitation services during the pandemic and FVC-19S score. Variables with significant univariable effects were further processed using logistic multivariate regression analysis. Odds ratio (OR) is presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Office Package 13) was used for building graphs and tables. The level of significance was fixed at 0.05.


The demographic features of SCI people are shown in Table 1. The respondents ranged in age from 18 to 84 with a mean age of 40.06 ± 14.52 years. Furthermore, the 30–39-year age group had the largest 26 (32.9%), followed by 40–49 years 22 (27.8%). Most 46 (58.2%) were thoracic, with another 31 (39.2%) cervical. According to ASIA grade (American Spinal Injury Association Scale (AIS) Grade), forty-one of the respondents (51.9%) had suffered complete injuries (ASIA grade A, at cervical, thoracic or lumbar level) with the injuries of the other 38 (48.1%) incomplete (ASIA B, C, D). Traffic accidents were the most common cause 30 (38.0%), followed by falls 25 (31.6%) and work accidents 13 (16.5%).

Table 1 Participant demographics

Seventy-five of the participants (94.9%) made at least one irregular visit. Worry about virus transmission was the most common cause reported for not attending physical therapy sessions. Only 10 of those participants (12.7%) did not interrupt their physiotherapy sessions, whereas 50 (63.3%) took a break from regular physiotherapy sessions. Nineteen (24.1%) stopped going to their physiotherapy sessions completely during the pandemic. Thirteen of the participants (16.5%) reported having gone to the hospital for various other reasons, of which urinary and respiratory system were the most common. More details are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Participants' rehabilitative activities during the pandemic

The mean FCV-19S score was 21 ± 2.6, and 69 of the respondents (87.3%) were classified as having an intense fear of COVID-19. Three of the respondents (3.8%) reported having been infected with COVID-19 (Table 2).

During the epidemic, the mental component summary (MCS) = 17.50 ± 1.29 and the physical component summary (PCS) = 13.12 ± 1.13. This compares to the pre-epidemic period with the mental component summary (MCS) = 20.01 ± 1.38 and the physical component summary (PCS) = 15.09 ± 1.17. Participants' mental and physical QoL dropped significantly during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (P = 0.014, P = 0.021 respectively) Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Changes in the participants' quality of life (MCS) is the mental component summary, and (PCS) is the physical component summary

Table 3 shows that there was no significant association between the FCV-19S results and gender of participants, cause of SCI injury, the level of injury or time since injury. They were also not significantly related to the changes in PCS-12 or MCS-12 scores (Table 4). There were, however, significant relationships between the FCV-19S results and the completeness of their injury (p = 0.017) and their ASIA score (p = 0.019).

Table 3 Correlations between the characteristics of participants and FCV-19S
Table 4 Correlations between FCV-19S scores and patients’ QOL

Additionally, there was no significant association between the FCV-19S results and access to the hospital or clinics during the pandemic, but the association with attendance at physiotherapy sessions (p = 0.03) and irregular follow-up visits was significant (p = 0.004) (Table 5).

Table 5 Correlations between rehabilitative activity and FCV-19S

Four factors with significant differences in the univariate analysis were further together analyzed by logistic multivariate regression analysis to acquire adjusted OR, including the completeness of their injury, ASIA score, attendance at physiotherapy sessions and irregular follow-up visits. Results revealed that the fear of COVID-19 was more effective on the following two factors, completeness of their injury, and irregular follow-up visits. Patients with complete SCI had more fear of COVID-19 than patients with incomplete SCI (OR 1.75, 95% CI 0.96–3.11). In addition, the fear among the patients during the pandemic affected their attendance at the physiotherapy sessions. The more fear of COVID-19, the more irregular follow-up visits to the outpatient rehabilitation clinic among patients with SCI (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.12–2.31), (Table 4).


The COVID-19 pandemic has created a considerable challenge to the health system because of the enormous influx of COVID-19 patients into healthcare facilities, often requiring long-term or intensive care. As a result, healthcare facilities, particularly neurological departments, rehabilitation services, and physiotherapy centers that treat SCI patients, have had to make significant changes, such as foregoing many non-urgent elective surgeries and minimizing patient volume.[34]. In addition, many physiotherapy centers have sought to curtail their activities in response to the social distancing procedures intended to reduce virus transmission. [35]. Furthermore, the state of anxiety and fear among the patients prompted many of them to discontinue attending their physiotherapy sessions [36].

This study has revealed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, most of the participants made irregular visits to rehabilitation clinics during routine checkups. Fear of catching the virus was the most commonly reported cause for not attending their physiotherapy sessions. Half of them took a break from regular physiotherapy sessions and stopped going to their physical therapy sessions altogether.

There was, however, no significant relationship between fear of the virus and changes in the participants' physical or mental QOL. Fear of COVID-19 was, however, significantly related to the completeness of a respondent's injury. More complete injury predicts greater fear of COVID-19. And such fear significantly impacted the respondents' hospital visits or their ability to maintain attendance at their physiotherapy sessions. This could be attributed to the patients with SCI who are considered more at risk of infection because of their weakened immune system [21, 23], and their secondary health issues make them more susceptible to getting the virus [37]. These results are in line with a Japanese study conducted among patients with SCI showing that most participants had reduced frequency of going out and receiving home-visit nursing or rehabilitation services during the pandemic [38].

Patients with SCI during the COVID-19 pandemic experienced various physical, psychological, mental, and social challenges, each of which could negatively affect daily functioning and QOL. The results of this study indicated decreased participants' physical or mental QOL during the COVID-19 pandemic than pre-pandemic. The findings align with a previous study showing that persons with chronic diseases are more likely to have lower QOL scores during COVID-19 than pre-pandemics [39]. But the current results were in contrast to a studyconducted in Spain by Rudolf et al. [40], which reported no significant differences in patients with SCI before and during the pandemic across any of the physical and mental dimensions of the World Health Organization's quality of life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) domains. However, when participants were stratified into two groups based on their age, the younger group reported significantly lower scores on the physical and psychological dimensions of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire scores during the pandemic than they had before. There was no such significant difference among the older group [40].

The daily routines and physical activities of patient with SCI changed due to the pandemic. Another Spanish study of full-time manual wheelchair users with a thoracic SCI between T2 and T12 showed reduced physical activity compared to the pre-epidemic period [41]. With or without a disability, people had to leave school or work, spent more time watching television, and had irregular sleep times and mealtimes [41]. Patient with SCI became more reliant on a caregiver and they too worried about catching the virus. These lifestyle modifications have been shown to induce psychosocial distress in people at greater risk of virus transmission, including patients with SCI [16, 25]. A British study of patients with an SCI which asked open-ended questions about their experiences during the epidemic revealed that most of them had health anxieties which were exacerbated by what the respondents perceived to be their increased vulnerability to respiratory problems and social isolation [42].

In China, discomfort, pain, depression and anxiety were considered the most common problems during the pandemic [22]. Health anxiety in general and fear of COVID-19 in particular have been related to post-traumatic stress symptomatology [20, 24]. Symptoms of anxiety were found in 20.5% of the respondents in China during the pandemic [43] and symptoms of depression were found in 36.4%. That has a detrimental impact on the QoL of patients with SCI [44], as this study has confirmed, where patients with disabilities such as patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), are considered more at risk from COVID-19 infection because of their social and clinical characteristics, like weakend immune system [21, 23]. The most common complication in severe COVID-19 cases is respiratory impairment. Patients with SCI are more vulnerable to respiratory problems [45], which are identical to COVID-19 symptoms such as dyspnea (33%), cough (52%) and fever (74%) [46]. Moreover, they typically suffer from secondary health issues that make them more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 and can be lethal [37]. This leads to more fear among this group of people.

In addition, COVID-19 has changed the routines of physiotherapy sessions and access to rehabilitation services among patients with an SCI [36]. It has interrupted their rehabilitation sessions, suspending physical therapy and other rehabilitation interventions, which will normally cause a deterioration in mental and physical functioning. Hearn et al. [17] who reported a substantial deterioration regarding the mental and physical aspects of life among patients with SCI. This deterioration be attributed to the lack of access to healthcare facilities and the obligatory isolation due to quarantine.

An important lesson is that in a pandemic vulnerable persons require further education about the importance of appropriate physical activity.

There are some concerns about the health, safety, and protection of patients with SCI in the community [47]. As a result, in this study, an additional aim was to gain a deeper understanding of the pandemic's overall psychological effects on the quality of life of patients with SCI and the effect of the pandemic on their attending of physiotherapy sessions, so that this knowledge might be used to support and guide future care. As well as future studies should focus on how patients with SCI in the community adapt to and cope with continuous waves of the COVID-19 virus and how these influence their livelihood and daily life routine.

Study limitations

This study's sample size was smaller than it might have been because some potential participants could not be contacted by phone. Others' responses were omitted from the analyses owing to people not matching the inclusion criteria and the small sample size might have affected the results because of a lack of statistical power. In addition, the absence of equality between the proportion of male and female participants causes limited generalizability by the proportion of male participants. The questionnaire-based portion of the study depended on the respondents' memories of their physical and mental QoL during the period studied. Recall bias may therefore have been present in addition to the ever-present tendency for socially acceptable responding.


The physical and mental QoL of the patients with SCI was significantly degraded during the pandemic. Most of them had a fear of COVID-19 categorized as intense. The pandemic disrupted the rehabilitation programs of many patients with SCI. Patients with complete SCI injuries were most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which affected the continuance of attendance of their physiotherapy sessions. So, more attention should be taken to those patients to avoid staying away from their rehabilitation services since lack of access to healthcare facilities and rehabilitation services substantially deteriorates the mental and physical aspects of life among patients with SCI [17].

Availability of data and materials

The data generated in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Lipsitch M, Swerdlow DL, Finelli L. Defining the epidemiology of covid-19: studies needed. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1194–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72,314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020;323(13):1239–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giordano L, Cipollaro L, Migliorini F, Maffulli N. Impact of Covid-19 on undergraduate and residency training. Surgeon. 2021;19(5):e199-206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Galea S, Merchant RM, Lurie N. The mental health consequences of COVID-19 and physical distancing: the need for prevention and early intervention. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(6):817–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet (London, England). 2020;395(10227):912–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Post MWM. Definitions of quality of life: what has happened and how to move on. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2014;20(3):167–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang Y, Ma ZF. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health and Quality of Life among Local Residents in Liaoning Province, China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7).

  8. Algahtani FD, Hassan S-U-N, Alsaif B, Zrieq R. Assessment of the Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(3).

  9. Vives Alvarado JR, Miranda-Cantellops N, Jackson SN, Felix ER. Access limitations and level of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in a geographically-limited sample of individuals with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(5):700–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trgovcevic S, Milicevic M, Nedovic G, Jovanic G. Health condition and quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury. Iran J Public Health. 2014;43(9):1229–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. de França ISX, Coura AS, de França EG, Basílio NNV, Souto RQ. Quality of life of adults with spinal cord injury: a study using the WHOQOL-bref. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011;45(6):1364–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al. Overview of the spinal cord injury-quality of life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(3):257–69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Alpalhão V, Alpalhão M. Impact of COVID-19 on Physical therapist practice in Portugal. Phys Ther. 2020;100(7):1052–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parnes N, Tousant C, Perrine J, DeFranco MJ. Outpatient orthopedic rehabilitation in New York State during the COVID-19 pandemic: therapist perspectives. Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):292–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Elsayed W, Albagmi F, Hussain M, Alghamdi M, Farrag A. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical therapy practice in Saudi Arabia. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(12):e0278785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Carda S, Invernizzi M, Bavikatte G, Bensmaïl D, Bianchi F, Deltombe T, et al. COVID-19 pandemic. What should Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine specialists do? A clinician’s perspective. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56(4):515–24.

  17. Hearn JH, Rohn EJ, Monden KR. Isolated and anxious: a qualitative exploration of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals living with spinal cord injury in the UK. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(5):691–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mickens MN, Perrin P, Goldsmith JA, Khalil RE, Carter Iii WE, Gorgey AS. Leisure-time physical activity, anthropometrics, and body composition as predictors of quality of life domains after spinal cord injury: an exploratory cross-sectional study. Neural Regen Res. 2022;17(6):1369–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dolbow DR, Gorgey AS, Ketchum JM, Gater DR. Home-based functional electrical stimulation cycling enhances quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2013;19(4):324–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahorsu DK, Lin C-Y, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH. The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation, vol. 20. International journal of mental health and addiction. United States; 2022. p. 1537–45.

  21. Held KS, Steward O, Blanc C, Lane TE. Impaired immune responses following spinal cord injury lead to reduced ability to control viral infection. Exp Neurol. 2010;226(1):242–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Vol. 33, General psychiatry. 2020. p. e100213.

  23. Brommer B, Engel O, Kopp MA, Watzlawick R, Müller S, Prüss H, et al. Spinal cord injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome enhances infection susceptibility dependent on lesion level. Brain. 2016;139(3):692–707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tzur Bitan D, Grossman-Giron A, Bloch Y, Mayer Y, Shiffman N, Mendlovic S. Fear of COVID-19 scale: psychometric characteristics, reliability and validity in the Israeli population. Psychiatry Res. 2020;289:113100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Irgens I, Bach B, Rekand T, Tornås S. Optimal management of health care for persons with disability related to spinal cord injury: learning from the Sunnaas model of telerehabilitation. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020;6(1):88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hossain MA, Hossain KMA, Sakel M, Kabir MF, Saunders K, Faruqui R, et al. Knowledge, Attitudes, Behavioural Practises, and Psychological Impact Relating to COVID-19 Among People Living With Spinal Cord Injury During In-Patient Rehabilitation in Bangladesh. Front Neurol. 2021;12:739354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ware JJ, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chi X, Chen S, Chen Y, Chen D, Yu Q, Guo T, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the fear of COVID-19 scale among chinese population. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(2):1273–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsipropoulou V, Nikopoulou VA, Holeva V, Nasika Z, Diakogiannis I, Sakka S, et al. Psychometric properties of the greek version of FCV-19S. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(6):2279–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huarcaya-Victoria J, Villarreal-Zegarra D, Podestà A, Luna-Cuadros MA. Psychometric properties of a Spanish version of the fear of COVID-19 scale in general population of lima. Peru Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(1):249–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alyami M, Al-Sharef A, Al-Aseri M, Henning M. Mammography self-efficacy scale and breast cancer fear scale: psychometric properties of the arabic versions among Saudi women. Cancer Nurs. 2021;44(2):163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Haktanir A, Seki T, Dilmaç B. Adaptation and evaluation of Turkish version of the fear of COVID-19 Scale. Death Stud. 2022;46(3):719–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nikopoulou VA, Holeva V, Parlapani E, Karamouzi P, Voitsidis P, Porfyri GN, et al. Mental health screening for COVID-19: a proposed cutoff score for the Greek version of the fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S). Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(2):907–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jean WC, Ironside NT, Sack KD, Felbaum DR, Syed HR. The impact of COVID-19 on neurosurgeons and the strategy for triaging non-emergent operations: a global neurosurgery study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(6):1229–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Faqih AI, Sodhai V. Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on orthopaedic and physical therapy practice. In 2020.

  36. Monden KR, Andrews E, Pilarski C, Hearn J, Wudlick R, Morse LR. COVID-19 and the spinal cord injury community: concerns about medical rationing and social isolation. Rehabil Psychol. 2021;66(4):373–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoogenes B, Querée M, Townson A, Willms R, Eng JJ. COVID-19 and spinal cord injury: clinical presentation, clinical course, and clinical outcomes: a rapid systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2021;38(9):1242–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Matsuoka M, Sumida M. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the health-related quality of life in home-based patients with spinal cord injuries in Japan. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(5):760–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ping W, Zheng J, Niu X, Guo C, Zhang J, Yang H, et al. Evaluation of health-related quality of life using EQ-5D in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(6):e0234850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. García-Rudolph A, Saurí J, López Carballo J, Cegarra B, Wright MA, Opisso E, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on community integration, quality of life, depression and anxiety in people with chronic spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(5):681–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Marco-Ahulló A, Montesinos-Magraner L, González L-M, Morales J, Bernabéu-García JA, García-Massó X. Impact of COVID-19 on the self-reported physical activity of people with complete thoracic spinal cord injury full-time manual wheelchair users. J Spinal Cord Med. 2022;45(5):755–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Irgens I, Rekand T, Arora M, Liu N, Marshall R, Biering-Sørensen F, et al. Telehealth for people with spinal cord injury: a narrative review. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(7):643–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guo J, Feng XL, Wang XH, van IJzendoorn MH. Coping with COVID-19: Exposure to COVID-19 and negative impact on livelihood predict elevated mental health problems in Chinese Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11).

  44. Liu T, Xie S, Wang Y, Tang J, He X, Yan T, et al. Effects of app-based transitional care on the self-efficacy and quality of life of patients with spinal Cord Injury in China: randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2021;9(4):e22960.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Van BJJ, Baicker K, Boggio PS, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M, et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(5):460–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Satici B, Gocet-Tekin E, Deniz ME, Satici SA. Adaptation of the fear of COVID-19 Scale: its association with psychological distress and life satisfaction in Turkey. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(6):1980–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mitchell MC, Burns NR, Dorstyn DS. Screening for depression and anxiety in spinal cord injury with DASS-21. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(8):547–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful to our all respondents for accepting to participate in our study.



Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All of the authors participated in the study's design, oversaw data collection, contributed to reducing, analyzing and interpreting the data, and were involved in writing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. All our methods were carried out under relevant guidelines and regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all the participants included in the study. We explained the purpose of the survey to each participant and the way to answer the questionnaire, and it was all voluntary, no names were taken, so we provided anonymous data collection.

Consent for publication

Consent to publish was obtained from all patients detailed in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khadour, F.A., Khadour, Y.A., Ebrahem, B.M. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the quality of life and accessing rehabilitation services among patients with spinal cord injury and their fear of COVID-19. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 319 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: