Skip to main content

Finite element analysis of a novel anatomical locking plate for scapular neck fracture



Reconstruction plates (RPs) are commonly used in scapular neck fractures (SNFs): however, RPs have many defects. In this study, we evaluated a newly designed scapular neck anatomical locking compression plate (SNALCP).


An SNF finite element model (Miller-type IIB) was constructed. Plates were subsequently implanted into the scapula and fixed with screws that were grouped according to the plate used: SNALCP (A) and RP (B). Finally, loads were applied to record and analyze performance.


Under lateral, anteroposterior, and vertical compression loads, the maximum von Mises stresses on the scapula and implants of group A were smaller than those of group B. There were some differences in stress distribution between the two groups.


SNALCP can effectively reduce the stress of the scapula and implant, making stress distribution more uniform and continuous, and has mechanical conduction advantages. Compared to RP, it provides improved stability and more reliable fixation.


Scapular neck fractures (SNFs) account for approximately 7%–25% of all scapular fractures, and 1% of all general fractures. SNFs are predominantly caused by high-energy violent injuries, such as traffic accidents, falling from high places, and trauma from heavy objects, or the indirect forces of the impact of the humeral head on the scapular glenoid when falling on the side [1,2,3]. In recent years, with the increasing incidence of high-energy trauma, SNFs have become more common in patients with multiple trauma [4].

The Miller classification of SNFs based on the location of the fracture line is most commonly used in clinics [5]. Type IIB SNF is a more common type of fracture in clinical practice. Most SNFs can be treated conservatively by suspension or abductive traction; however, many studies have reported a higher risk of poor prognosis, especially in the presence of significant fracture displacement. As such, surgical intervention should be considered for severely displaced SNFs [3, 4, 6, 7].

Currently, many surgical implant schemes can be used to treat SNFs, including reconstruction plates (RPs), straight locking plates, distal radius T-plates, and Y-locking plates [4, 8,9,10]. RPs are the most commonly used as they provide relatively reliable internal fixation and general functional results [3, 9, 11]. However, RP does not conform to the anatomic shape of the scapular neck, and the strength of RP is also affected by the need for repeated adjustments. The scapular neck is a cancellous bone with a deep location; in most cases, only one or two screws can be placed in the scapular neck with RP. The direction of the screws is difficult to control, and they can easily penetrate the joint cavity. This can easily lead to a lack of internal fixation control, which affects the stability of the fractured end, especially for scapular neck comminuted or osteoporotic fractures [12, 13].

In a previous study, we developed an understanding of the anatomical characteristics of the scapular neck and the important parameters of the surrounding tissues through preliminary basic research on the scapula [14]. We designed a new scapular neck anatomical locking compression plate (SNALCP, Fig. 1) to solve the above problems, for which we obtained a national utility model invention patent (Patent Number: 20221488758.0). SNALCP conforms to the anatomical characteristics of the scapular neck. The plate runs from the scapular neck along the lateral border, and is divided into three parts: the scapular glenoid neck, junction, and lateral border. The scapular glenoid neck part is arched and perfectly fits with the arc of the scapular glenoid neck. A locking nail is designed above the center of the glenoid at the top of the plate, and the screw hole direction is tilted 6° to the left and 21° to the bottom. Underneath, it is designed with two locking screws in the direction of the coracoid process. The second screw is located in the center of the glenoid neck, and is angled 31° to the right. The third screw is located near the junction part and is angled 16° to the right. The three staggered locking screws realize the three-dimensional fixation of scapular glenoid neck. For the junction part, the angle is designed to match the abduction angle of the scapula (the frontal view is consistent with the abduction angle of 130°). The overall clockwise torsion from the scapular glenoid neck part to the junction part is 5°. The lateral border part is consistent with the back of the lateral border of the scapula. Four common locking joint holes have been designed, and the locking method can be selected according to the patient’s needs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagram showing the design and main parameters of the new scapular neck anatomical locking plate. a Frontal view. b Side view

We hypothesized that SNALCP would have better biomechanical properties compared to RP. Therefore, this study aimed to use finite element analysis to compare the biomechanical characteristics of SNALCP and RP in treating SNFs to lay a foundation for future clinical trials.

Materials and methods

Finite element analysis: collection of imaging data

Informed consent was obtained from all participants of this study, and the study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (Approval Number: KY2022067). A healthy adult male volunteer aged 40 years weighing 75 kg and with a height of 175 cm was chosen as the model. The scapula was scanned using spiral computed tomography (CT), and the thickness of the scanning layer was 1 mm. The data were saved in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format.

Finite element models and implants

Mimics 17.0 software (Materialise, Belgium) was applied to reconstruct a three-dimensional (3D) model of the scapula from the CT images. The model was subsequently imported into Geomagic2017 software (Geomagic, USA), and subdivided into triangular facets, noise reduction, and smooth processing. Thereafter, this model was imported into the Solidworks2017 (Dassault System, France) to simulate the type IIB SNF model [11] (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Scapular neck fracture models. b Group A (SNALCP). c Group B (RP)

Next, two types of implants were constructed using Solidworks2017 software and divided into group A (SNALCP, Fig. 2b) and group B (RP, Fig. 2c). Standard surgical techniques were simulated to place the two types of implants into the SNF models. The parameters of the SNALCP (7-holes) are shown in Fig. 1, while the RP (10-holes) measured 124 mm × 10 mm (Waston Medical Instrument Co., Ltd., China; Additional file 1).

Volume mesh generation

Finite-element models were constructed using linear tetrahedrons. We set the number of nodes and elements of the two models based on the 3D finite element models of Groups A and B (Table 1).

Table 1 Number of nodes and elements in the meshes of the two groups of models

Assignment of material properties

In this experiment, all materials (including the bone, plates, and screws) were assumed to be linearly elastic, isotropic, and homogeneous. The specific parameters, which were decided in accordance with the existing literature [15] are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Material properties of the components in this study

Boundary and loading conditions

The 3D models constructed as described above were analyzed using the finite element analysis software ANSYS Workbench 17.0. A coefficient of friction of 0.37 was assigned between the bone and plate contacts, and a value of 1.0 was assigned between the broken bone fragments (i.e., at fracture interfaces) of the bone and plate contacts. The contact behaviors of the screw and plate interfaces and screw and bone interfaces were defined as ties [16]. All contact elements were defined as deformable elements.

Three loads in different directions were applied to the two sets of models and the corresponding boundary conditions were set (Fig. 3). To simulate the most common injury mechanism of the scapular neck (a fall landing on one side with trauma transmitted through the proximal humerus to the scapular neck), a 900 N lateral compression load was applied along the axis of the scapula with the scapula glenoid neck as the force surface. The medial border of the scapula was fixed (Fig. 3a, b). To simulate direct trauma from behind and above, a 900 N anteroposterior compression load (Fig. 3c, d) and a vertical compression load (Fig. 3e, f) were set (Additional file 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Loading and boundary condition of the 3D model. Red represents the force surface and blue represents boundary condition. a, b Force surface and boundary condition for Lateral compression load. c, d Force surface and boundary condition for anteroposterior compression load. e, f Force surface and boundary condition for vertical compression load

Observation index

The maximum von Mises stresses and stress distribution on the scapula and implants, as well as the maximum displacements of the fracture gaps, were recorded and analyzed by applying loads in different directions to the two models.


Scapula stress

The stress distribution in each group was similar for the lateral and anteroposterior compression loads. For the vertical compression load, the stress in group A was concentrated at the lateral border of the scapula, while the stress in Group B was concentrated in the scapular body (Fig. 4). The maximum stresses under the lateral, anteroposterior, and vertical compression loads on the scapula of group A (8.0549, 3.0775, and 36.5620 Mpa, respectively) were lower than those of group B (8.5774, 4.9786, and 51.4000 Mpa, respectively; Fig. 5a).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Stress distribution of the scapula. Group A (SNALCP). Group B (RP)

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Maximum von Mises stress on the scapula. b Maximum von Mises stress on the implants. c Maximum displacement of the fracture gap

Implant stress

For the lateral and vertical compression loads, the stress distribution of each group was found to be similar, mainly concentrated in the middle of the steel plates. However, the stress distribution of group A was more uniform and continuous than that of group B. For the anteroposterior compression load, the stress in group A was concentrated at the distal and proximal ends of the plate, while the stress in group B was concentrated at the proximal end of the plate and the two proximal screws (Fig. 6). Moreover, the maximum stresses under lateral, anteroposterior, and vertical compression loads on the implants of group A (25.3300, 1.7581, and 341.3900 Mpa, respectively) were lower than those of group B (41.1300, 2.2729, and 539.3800 Mpa, respectively; Fig. 5b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Stress distribution of the implants. Group A (SNALCP). Group B (RP)

Fracture displacements

For lateral, anteroposterior, and vertical compression loads, the maximum fracture displacements of group A were 0.0081 mm, 0.0076 mm, and 0.4837 mm, respectively, which were relatively less than those of group B (0.0132, 0.0119, and 0.8088 mm, respectively; Fig. 5c).


Due to the high-energy nature of SNFs, most patients experience multiple traumatic injuries, such as rib fractures, rotator cuff injuries, proximal humerus fractures, and brain injuries. Moreover, SNFs are in a deep position and are often overlooked [17, 18]. In the past, most scholars have recommended conservative treatment for such fractures, but with medical advances and improved understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the scapular neck, orthopedic surgeons who treat SNFs agree that surgical rather than conservative treatment of unstable scapular fractures improves patient outcomes [3, 11, 12, 19, 20]. Open reduction and internal fixation in the treatment of SNFs are beneficial to early postoperative functional exercise, reduce pain, and prevent complications such as malunion, muscle imbalance, rotator cuff dysfunction, scapulothoracic dyskinesis and impingement [9, 20, 21]. However, owing to the complex anatomical structure of the scapula neck, a standard internal fixation device is lacking in clinical practice.

Jaikish et al. [9] achieved good clinical results in the treatment of displaced SNFs using reconstructive plates. They believed that RP for SNFs can ensure solid fixation and enable early functional exercise of the shoulder. However, J. Zhang et al. [12] believed that the anatomical structure of the scapula is special and that the reconstructed plate needs to be shaped repeatedly during surgery, which prolongs the surgical time and affects material strength and screw placement, resulting in an increased risk of postoperative infection, failure of internal fixation, and displacement of the fracture end. In their retrospective controlled clinical study, the authors aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of double-row titanium anatomical plates and reconstruction plates for extra-articular fractures of the scapula, finding that there was less intraoperative blood loss and shorter surgical duration in the anatomical plate group than in the reconstruction plate group, and that these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.01). However, most other fixation methods, such as Kirschner wire, hollow nail, straight locking plate, distal radius T-plate, and Y-locking plate do not conform to the anatomical shape of the scapula neck, resulting in only moderate fixation efficacy. Moreover, most fixation methods lack supporting experimental biomechanical data.

Therefore, for SNFs, we designed the SNALCP, which conforms to the anatomical characteristics of the scapular neck. For the scapular glenoid neck portion, we designed three staggered locking screws in the neck, set at a certain angle, to accomplish 3D fixation of the scapular glenoid neck and ensure more powerful internal fixation. During the operation, the plate could be attached to the bone surface of the neck and to the lateral border of the scapula with no or only slight reshaping required: this can significantly reduce the shaping time of the implant. It also effectively reduces the risk of screw insertion into the joint or damage to important tissue structures around the scapula neck (suprascapular nerves and blood vessels).

Through finite element analysis, a 3D finite element model of the SNF (Miller type IIB) was constructed that was fixed with the SNALCP and RP to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the two fixation methods. First, by comparing the maximum von Mises stresses and stress distribution on the scapula and implants of the two groups, the mechanical conduction of the two types of implants in the scapula could be evaluated [22,23,24,25]. The results of finite element analysis in the present study showed that both the SNALCP and RP effectively reduced the stress at the fracture site of the scapula under lateral, anteroposterior, and vertical loads. However, the maximum stresses of group A were smaller than those of group B. In addition, compared with group A, the stress distribution of group B has obvious high-stress concentration repercussions. In particular, when subjected to vertical compression loads, the stress in the middle of the medial border of the RP was high and highly concentrated, indicating a high risk of internal fixation failure, while the maximum stress of group A was reduced by approximately 37%. This indicates that the SNALCP has an obvious mechanical conduction advantage over RP. We speculate that this may be because the SNALCP is better fitted to the surface of the scapula, and has a larger contact area that can effectively prevent stress concentration and thereby reduce the risk of loosening of internal fixation or fracture.

The biomechanical stability of the implants in scapular fractures can be evaluated by comparing the relative displacements of the fracture gaps between the two groups of models. Overall, our data show that the maximum displacements of the fracture gaps in group A were smaller than those in group B under three different loads, indicating that the new anatomic locking plate of the scapular neck provided better stability and fixation than the reconstructed plate. We further demonstrated that the anatomical design of the scapula glenoid neck portion of the SNALCP ensures a perfect fit with the arc of the scapula glenoid neck. Three-dimensional fixation of the scapular glenoid neck was realized using three staggered locking screws, which made the screw-holding force stronger and had a better fixation effect on the scapular neck fracture. Stable fixation is essential for fracture healing to achieve better functional outcomes, particularly in patients with osteoporotic or comminuted fractures.

This study has some limitations. First, we did not take into account the influence of the muscle and ligament tissues around the scapula on the biomechanics of the scapular neck. Moreover, the shoulder joint is the most active joint in the human body, and the cyclic dynamic loads of the shoulder joint in different ranges of motion were not analyzed, which led to a difference between the data analyzed by the model and the actual data. Second, only the type IIB SNF model was analyzed, and further research is required for other classifications. In addition, there are certain differences in the scapula between different groups or sexes, and the SNALCP may not be perfect for everyone. Finally, because FEA is a simulation analysis, our results need to be confirmed by in vitro biomechanical experiments and prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials.


The SNALCP reduces the stress on the implant and scapula, and makes the stress more uniform and continuous, thereby ensuring better stability. This may have biomechanical advantages over RP in the treatment of SNFs. This study provides a biomechanical basis for the clinical application of SNALCP in SNFs.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article.



Scapular neck fracture


Reconstruction plate


Scapular neck anatomical locking compression plate


Computed tomography


Digital imaging and communications in medicine


Finite element analysis


  1. Chen L, Liu CL, Wu P. Fracture of the scapular neck combined with rotator cuff tear: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2020;8(24):6450–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen J, et al. Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khallaf F, Mikami A, Al-Akkad M. The use of surgery in displaced scapular neck fractures. Med Princ Pract. 2006;15(6):443–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Panigrahi R, et al. Outcome analysis of intra-articular scapula fracture fixation with distal radius plate: a multicenter prospective study. Arch Trauma Res. 2016;5(4): e36406.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartoníček J, Tuček M. Infraglenoid fracture of the scapular neck fact or myth? Rozhl Chir. 2019;98(7):273–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bi AS, et al. Outcomes following extra-articular fractures of the scapula: a systematic review. Injury. 2020;51(3):602–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dienstknecht T, et al. A meta-analysis of operative versus nonoperative treatment in 463 scapular neck fractures. Scand J Surg. 2013;102(2):69–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Y, et al. Functional outcomes of extra-articular scapula fracture fixation with distal humeral Y-type locking plate: a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14(1):176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaikish S, Sambandam B. Functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation of displaced extra-articular scapula fractures. Indian J Orthop. 2021;55(3):708–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mannambeth R, Kirzner NB, Moaveni AK. Can displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula be stabilized through a direct lateral-column approach. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(Suppl 4):S626-s630.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bartoníček J, et al. Fractures of the scapular neck: diagnosis, classifications and treatment. Int Orthop. 2014;38(10):2163–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang J, et al. A comparative analysis of titanium anatomic plate and titanium reconstructive plate for treatment of extra-articular fractures of the scapula (Miller types IIb, IIc, and IV). J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022;31(6):1175–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sulkar HJ, et al. Mechanical testing of scapular neck fracture fixation using a synthetic bone model. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019;61:64–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Casier SJ, et al. Morphologic variations of the scapula in 3-dimensions: a statistical shape model approach. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27(12):2224–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang LL, Wang JP, Wang CT. Function study for finite element analysis of AB-IGHL during humeral external rotation. J Biomed Eng. 2009;26(3):504–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krishna KR, Sridhar I, Ghista DN. Analysis of the helical plate for bone fracture fixation. Injury. 2008;39(12):1421–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Voleti PB, Namdari S, Mehta S. Fractures of the scapula. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012: 903850.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Porcellini G, et al. Functional outcomes and clinical strength assessment after infraspinatus-sparing surgical approach to scapular fracture: does it really make a difference? J Orthop Traumatol. 2018;19(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohd Asihin MA, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of extraarticular scapular neck and body fractures with good short term functional outcome. Front Surg. 2019;6:71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cole PA, et al. Radiographic follow-up of 84 operatively treated scapula neck and body fractures. Injury. 2012;43(3):327–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noguchi T, Mautner JF, Duncan SFM. Dorsal plate fixation of scapular fracture. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(10):843.e1-843.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen H, et al. Finite element analysis of an intramedulary anatomical strut for proximal humeral fractures with disrupted medial column instability: a cohort study. Int J Surg. 2020;73:50–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng W, Liu Y, Hou X. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: a comparative finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;196: 105714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, et al. Biomechanical analysis of a novel clavicular hook plate for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a finite element analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2021;133: 104379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng MJ, et al. Biomechanical analysis for five fixation techniques of Pauwels-III fracture by finite element modeling. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;193: 105491.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province (2022NSFSC1534) and the Luzhou Science and Technology Bureau Project (2021-JYJ-60).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors read and approved by the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liang Luo or Yunkang Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (Approval Number: KY2022067).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

1.Detailed parameters of the SNALCP and the RP. 2.Detailed description of boundary and loading condition Settings.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, F., Xiao, Y., Wei, D. et al. Finite element analysis of a novel anatomical locking plate for scapular neck fracture. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 262 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Scapular neck fractures
  • Anatomical locking plate
  • Reconstruction plate
  • Biomechanical characteristics
  • Finite element analysis