Skip to main content

Letter to the Editor regarding “Clinical benefit of high tibial osteotomy combined with the intervention of platelet-rich plasma for severe knee osteoarthritis”

I read with great interest an article by Dong et al. [1]. The authors carried out a long-term, double–blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study aiming to reveal the therapeutic effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) injections or no post-treatment after open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in the end-stage patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and concluded that PRP post-treatment following HTO ended up with better surgery results in terms of functional outcomes and pain scores as well as cartilage regeneration compared with HA or no post-treatment. These results are noteworthy as they were obtained in patients with high degree of cartilage degeneration (Kellgren&Lawrence grades III and IV) although commonly HTO surgery is applied for patients with early and moderate OA with lower degree of cartilage degradation [2]. It is also worth to note that previously only three more studies with one to two years’ follow-up have been performed involving HTO associated with PRP and/or stromal vascular fraction (SVF) post-injections in patients with knee OA [3,4,5] and demonstrated significant improvements related to pain, cartilage healing, and clinical outcomes. However, all the above studies focused on registering structural changes only in the medial condyle and did not present records on alterations in the lateral compartment in the examined patients at the end of the follow-up. In contrast, in our preliminary 1.5-yearlong study describing clinical outcomes and synovial cytokine profiling in patients with knee OA in response to PRP or SVF post-treatments following open wedge HTO [6], we reported that SVF treatment demonstrated better outcomes according to Outerbridge and Koshino testing and produced more pronounced cartilage regeneration not only in the medial condyle but slowed down cartilage destruction in its lateral counterpart being more prominent in the femoral articular surface compared with PRP injection. At the same time, we also observed that PRP subgroup as well as SVF-treated patients demonstrated significant improvements in joint function, pain control, and cartilage regeneration compared with pre-operative state. However, PRP patients performed better in terms of functional results and pain relief (assessed by KOOS, KSS, and VAS scores) compared with the SVF subgroup. HTO functional outcomes obtained in our study are in agreement with that demonstrated by others [7, 8] whereas a combination of SVF and PRP has been shown to produce even better functional results compared with PRP alone after HTO therapy [5].

Another concern about the article by Dong et al. [1] and other abovementioned studies [3,4,5] is related to the absence of analyses of proinflammatory joint milieu that might affect molecular changes in the individual cells and tissues in the course of post-treatments. In view of this notion, we conducted a synovial fluid cytokine and growth factor profiling assessing 41 cytokine amounts in Multiplex Assay in the examined patients before and after both post-treatments. A significant decrease in synovial fluid concentrations of IL-6 and CXCL10 in the PRP subgroup as well as TNFα, FLT-3L, MIP-1β, RANTES, and VEGF in the SVF-treated patients might be associated with reduction of pain scores. At the same time, an augmentation of synovial growth factor concentrations such as PDGF-AB/BB in the PRP subgroup and FGF2 in patients with SVF post-treatment might be responsible for partial regeneration of the articular cartilage as it was suggested previously [9]. Multivariate Factor Analysis demonstrated that two main groups of the examined cytokines were related to each treatment procedure both prior to and one week after therapy. Moreover, the degree of connectivity estimated by STRING network analysis appeared to be stronger in both patient subgroups before treatment compared to that one week after both injections. Similar associations were observed in a recent study on synovial cytokine concentration changes during hyperacute serum treatment in human OA knee joints [10].

In conclusion, comprehensive studies of various orthobiologics associated with osteotomies including evaluation of functional outcomes at the molecular level such as analysis of proinflammatory environment and regenerative machineries should be encouraged in search for further improvement of treatment options for patients with OA.

References

  1. Dong C, Zhao C, Wang F. Clinical benefit of high tibial osteotomy combined with the intervention of platelet-rich plasma for severe knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dowd GSE, Somayaji HS, Uthukuri M. High tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Knee. 2006;13:87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang Q, Xu W, Wu K, Fu W, Yang H, Guo JJ. Intra-articular pure platelet-rich plasma combined with open-wedge high tibial osteotomy improves clinical outcomes and minimal joint space width compared with high tibial osteotomy alone in knee osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2022;38:476–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dallari D, Savarino L, Stagni C, Cenni E, Cenacchi A, Fornasari PM, Albisinni U, Rimondi E, Baldini N, Giunti A. Enhanced tibial osteotomy healing with use of bone grafts supplemented with platelet gel or platelet gel and bone marrow stromal cells. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2413–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koh Y-G, Kwon O-R, Kim Y-S, Choi Y-J. Comparative outcomes of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma alone or in combination with mesenchymal stem cell treatment: a prospective study. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:1453–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Prizov A, Tchetina E, Eremin I, Zagorodniy N, Pulin A, Belyak E, Goncharov E, Kotenko K, Smyshlyaev I, Glukhova S, Lila AM. Differences in synovial cytokine profile associated with long-term clinical outcomes in patients with knee osteoarthritis undergoing corrective osteotomy with platelet-rich plasma or stromal vascular fraction post-treatments. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Keyt LK, Hevesi M, Levy BA, Krych AJ, Camp CL, Stuart MJ. High tibial osteotomy with a modern polyetheretherketone (PEEK) system: mid-term results at a mean of 6 years follow-up. J Knee Surg. 2020;38:916–21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sawaguchi T, Takeuchi R, Nakamura R, Yonekura A, Akiyama T, Kerstan M, Goldhahn S. Outcome after treatment of osteoarthritis with open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy with a plate: 2-year results of a Japanese cohort study. J Orthop Surg. 2020;28:2309499019887997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tchetina EV, Antoniou J, Tanzer M, Zukor DJ, Poole AR. TGFβ2 suppresses collagen cleavage in cultured human osteoarthritic cartilage, reduces expression of genes associated with chondrocyte hypertrophy and degradation, and increases prostaglandin E2 production. Am J Pathol. 2006;168:131–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Olmos Calvo I, Fodor E, Kardos D, Hornyák I, Hinsenkamp A, Kuten-Pella O, Gyevnár Z, Erdélyi G, Bárdos T, Paukovits TM, Magos K, Béres G, Nehrer S, Lacza Z. A pilot clinical study of hyperacute serum treatment in osteoarthritic knee joint: cytokine changes and clinical effects. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2021;43(637):49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Project No. 1021062512064-0).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ET wrote the main manuscript text and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Tchetina.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tchetina, E. Letter to the Editor regarding “Clinical benefit of high tibial osteotomy combined with the intervention of platelet-rich plasma for severe knee osteoarthritis”. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 207 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03629-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03629-4