Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of included studies

From: The effectiveness of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality training in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Country

Study Design

Participants

N (XR/control)

Surgical approach

Surgical conditions

Type of XR

Comparator

Accuracy of inclination

Accuracy of anteversion

Surgical duration

         

XR

Control

XR

Control

XR

Control

Kartik et al.,2018 [24]

UK

RCT

Medical students

12/12

Posterior

Phantom hip model

AR

Training by an expert surgeon

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Kartik et al.,2019 [30]

UK

RCT

Residents

12/12

Direct anterior

Whole-body cadaver

VR

THA operation manual and annotated videos

3° ± 3°

15° ± 8°

4° ± 3°

16° ± 6°

42 ± 7 min

51 ± 9 min

Jessica et al.,2019 [22]

USA

RCT

Residents

7/7

Standard posterolateral

Pelvis-to-toes cadaver specimen

VR

Standard study materials

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

Kartik et al.,2020 [31]

UK

Prospective controlled study

Residents and expert hip surgeons

32/4

Direct anterior

Dry bone hip model or VR platform

VR

Expert hip surgeons

4° ± 2°

5° ± 2°

6° ± 3°

4° ± 2°

36 ± 6 min

30 ± 5 min

Clayton et al., 2020 [28]

USA

RCT

Residents

8/8

Direct anterior

Radiopaque foam pelvis

AR

Standard Fluoroscopic Technique

1.8° ± 1.4°

4.8° ± 2.2°

1.4° ± 0.7°

4.8° ± 3.2°

1.8 ± 0.25 min

3.9 ± 1.6 min

  1. N, the number of participants; XR, extended reality; RCT, randomized clinical trial; AR, augmented reality, NA, not available; VR, virtual reality; THA, total hip arthroplasty