Skip to main content
Download PDF

The incidence and risk factors for femoral head necrosis after femoral neck fracture in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 18, Article number: 22 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN) after pediatric femoral neck fracture (PFNF) in the literature varies widely, and the risk factors associated with AVN after PFNF are controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to accurately investigate the incidence of AVN after PFNF and systematically evaluate and meta-classify their risk factors.

Methods

A comprehensive search was performed of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. The pooled rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the incidence of AVN after PFNF, and pooled odds ratio (OR) were calculated to measure the effect sizes. In addition, we performed subgroup, stratified, and publication bias analyses.

Results

A total of 30 articles were included in our meta-analysis, with 303 AVN cases among 1185 patients. The pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF was 22% (95% CI 18%, 27%). Subgroup analyses indicated Delbet type I–IV fracture incidences with AVN of 45%, 32%, 17%, and 12%, respectively. The incidence of AVN after PFNF in Asia was 19%, lower than in Africa at 36%, Europe at 26%, and North America at 23%. In addition, the larger sample size group and the earlier published literature group showed a higher incidence of necrosis. Stratified analyses showed that patient age and Delbet fracture classification were both important factors affecting AVN after PFNF (OR = 1.61, p = 0.02 and OR = 3.02, p < 0.001, respectively), while the time to treatment was not (OR = 0.9, p = 0.71).

Conclusion

The pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF was ~ 22%; furthermore, the available evidence demonstrates that patient age and Delbet type of fracture were important influencing factors of AVN after PFNF.

Introduction

Pediatric femoral neck fractures (PFNFs) account for less than 1% of children’s fractures, but they are often accompanied by multiple complications, with the most common postoperative complication being avascular necrosis (AVN) [1,2,3]. Because of the high incidence of postoperative AVN, the controversies regarding the most appropriate management of AVN, and its consequent significant disability, it is extremely important to achieve a proper understanding of PFNF and the risk factors affecting AVN in order to minimize complications as much as possible [4,5,6,7,8]. According to the available literature, the incidence of AVN after PFNF varies from 0 to 53% [5, 9, 10]. A meta-analysis published by Yeranosian et al. [11] calculated the rate of AVN after PFNF to be 23% by calculating the population averaging. There are great differences in the reported incidence rates of AVN after PFNF, making it difficult for clinicians to accurately assess the risk.

There are likewise many controversies about the risk factors for the development of AVN after PFNF, including the patient’s age, the type of fracture, the time to treatment, and the methods of treatment utilized [10, 12,13,14]. In 2019, a multicenter study of 239 cases by Wang et al. found that age (older than 12 years old) was an independent risk factor for AVN after fracture, while the difference in Delbet type of fractures was not statistically significant [10]. However, multiple previous studies have shown that patient age is not a risk factor for post fracture necrosis [14,15,16], and AlKhatib et al. [17] conducted a meta-analysis of 6 studies and reported that Delbet type correlates with AVN after PFNF. The impact of the time from injury to treatment on the incidence of AVN after PFNF is also highly controversial. Yeranosian et al. reported that a delay in treatment of over 24 h was associated with a higher incidence of AVN [11]. AlKhatib’s report, on the other hand, came to the opposite conclusion [17]. The small sample size of the reported clinical studies and the complexity of complication-related risk factors are factors that have led authors different conclusions on the risk factors associated with AVN after PFNF.

Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review the literature to quantify the incidence of AVN after PFNF through a comprehensive search, and to explore the reasons for the wide variation in reported rates of AVN through subgroup analysis. Second, we wanted to explore the risk factors in this updated meta-analysis and to assess the effects of age, Delbet fracture type, and time to treatment on the rate of AVN in adolescent patients with femoral neck fracture.

Methods

Search strategies and selection criteria

The meta-analysis was designed and performed in accordance with the MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. [18, 19] We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to June 2022 using the terms “adolescent,” “teen,” “pediatric,” “femur neck fracture,” “femoral neck fracture,” “avascular necrosis of the femoral head,” “ischemic necrosis of the femoral head,” and “femoral head necrosis.” (See additional file 1) The search was limited to the English language literature.

Eligible studies were selected based on the following criteria: (1) age less than 18 years; (2) femoral neck fracture classification was Delbet type; and (3) Delbet fracture type, age, or time from injury to treatment in patients with AVN were described in detail. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) repeatedly published data or studies; (2) single case reports and reviews; and (3) studies that included only one type of fracture. Any dispute was resolved by discussion.

Data extraction and quality assessment

The two authors (P-FX and Z-QL) independently evaluated the retrieved articles by reading the title and abstract and evaluated all articles that met the criteria by obtaining the full text. The following information was collected: first author, year of publication, country, the total number of patients, age of patients, time to follow-up, Delbet type of fracture, number of patients with AVN, and time from injury to treatment. The Delbet classification includes four types: type I (transepiphyseal), II (transcervical), III (cervicotrochanteric), and IV (intertrochanteric) [20]. We define them as two groups (Delbet I-II type versus Delbet III-IV type). Patients were defined as having had early treatment (≤ 24 h) and late treatment (> 24 h) according to the time from injury to treatment. Low age (≤ 12 years) and older age (> 12 years) groups were defined according to age. The methodological study quality assessment of the included case–control or retrospective cohort studies used the modified Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS), and the case series studies were assessed using a checklist that was developed at the Institute of Health Economics (IHE) [21, 22]. Study quality was evaluated independently by two reviewers.

Statistical analysis

We performed the meta-analysis using Stata 12.0 software and RevMan 5.2 software. Data were extracted, and the pooled incidence rate of AVN after PFNF and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. In cases where a study reported no events of AVN, we applied a continuity correction of 0.5 to each cell to allow for analysis [23]. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the year of publication, country, sample size, Delbet type, and patient age. Moreover, stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the risk of AVN after PFNF in patients with Delbet I–II versus Delbet III–IV fracture types, patients with low age versus older age groups, and patients with early versus late treatment. An odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was summarized. For heterogeneity analysis, a Q test (P > 0.10) or I2 test < 50% was considered homogeneity among studies, and the fixed effect model was adopted; in contrast, when heterogeneity among studies was detected, a random-effects model was used. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by a study removal approach to evaluate the quality and consistency of the results. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger’s test [24].

Results

Details regarding the included literature

A total of 798 articles were identified from the three databases, and a total of 380 articles were removed due to article repetition. After reading the title, abstract, and full text, we determined that 30 articles met the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis. The flowchart depicting the PRISMA decision process can be seen in Fig. 1. In this study, studies were published between 1962 and 2022 and performed in China [10, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31], America [2, 9, 12, 14, 32,33,34,35], India [15, 36, 37], Turkey [5, 16, 38], Serbia [39], Austria [40], Morocco [41], Saudi Arabia [42], Egypt [43], Germany [44], Canada [45], and England [20]. Eleven were retrospective case–control studies, one was a retrospective cohort study, and eighteen were case series studies. Detailed information on the 30 included articles is shown in Table 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies on the femoral head necrosis after femoral neck fracture
Full size table

Quality assessment

Methodological quality was considered high for studies with NOS scores equal to or greater than 6 [21]. Twelve studies were evaluated as having high methodological quality in accordance with the NOS. Based on the IHE tool, the checklist consists of 20 criteria, and eighteen studies were reviewed by answering “yes,” “partial,” “no,” or “unclear.” We then tallied the number of “yes” and “partial” answers to estimate the risk of bias [22]. In total, the mean study IHE score was 10.5 of 20 possible points. The scoring system of IHE does not assign a minimum score in which a certain level of quality is achieved [22]; for the case series, the average score was judged to be fair.

The incidence of AVN after PFNF

A total of 1185 patients (1193 hips) were included in the study, including 303 hips with AVN after PFNF, ranging in age from 0 to 18 years. The overall pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF was 22% (95% CI 18%, 27%). As the heterogeneity test showed heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 76.4%, p < 0.001), the random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis (Fig. 2). The AVN rates of all included articles are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of pooled incidence rate of AVN after PFNF

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

AVN incidence trended for publishing literature

Full size image

Subgroup analyses showed that the pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF in 2000–2009 was 21%, lower than in 1962–1999 at 26% and in 2010–2020 at 22%. The pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF in Asia was 19%, lower than in Africa at 36%, Europe at 26%, and North America at 23%. The pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF was 45% for Type I fractures, 32% for Type II fractures, 17% for Type III fractures, and 12% for Type IV fractures (see Table 2). Subgroup analyses also showed studies with larger sample sizes than those with smaller sample sizes (28% vs. 19%, p < 0.001) and older age group than low age group (28% vs. 22%; Table 2).

Table 2 Subgroup analysis of femoral head necrosis rate
Full size table

Risk factors for AVN after PFNF

Of the 30 included studies, 13 reported [2, 5, 8, 12, 13, 22, 28,29,30,31, 34, 36, 37] in detail the correlation between age and AVN after PFNF. Pooled results with a fixed effect model showed that older age group (> 12 years) were associated with a higher risk of AVN after PFNF (OR: 1.61, 95% CI 1.09 and 2.39, p = 0.02; I2 = 8%; Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot: pooled odds ratio (OR) for AVN in the low age group (≤ 12 years) versus older age group (> 12 years) PFNF

Full size image

Data on Delbet classification were available for the meta-analysis from twenty-eight studies, and the fixed effect model was used since there was no obvious heterogeneity (I2 = 9%, P < 0.001). The analysis showed that AVN was more associated with Delbet type I-II fractures in comparison to Delbet type III–IV fractures (OR: 3.02, 95% CI 2.25 and 4.04, p < 0.001; Fig. 5). However, comparison of the comparative effect of early (≤ 24 h) versus late (> 24 h) treatment of PFNF showed no significant difference in the rate of AVN (OR: 0.9, 95% CI 0.50 and 1.59, p = 0.71; Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot: pooled odds ratio (OR) for AVN in the Delbet type I-II versus Delbet type III-IV PFNF

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Forest plot: pooled odds ratio (OR) for AVN in the early treatment (≤ 24 h) versus late treatment (> 24 h) PFNF

Full size image

Sensitivity analyses and publication bias

Sensitivity analysis was performed on the selected studies to assess whether any individual studies affected the total femoral head necrosis rate, and the outcomes suggested relatively good agreement among studies. (See additional file 2) The funnel plots of patient age and Delbet fracture type publication bias are shown in Fig. 7a, b. Visual inspection indicates that these plots are symmetrical, suggesting low risk of publication bias. Egger’s regression test also indicated a low probability of publication bias (p = 0.240 and 0.121, respectively).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Study publication bias funnel plot; a patient age profile published bias funnel, and b Delbet classification situation published bias funnel

Full size image

Discussion

In this meta-analysis, we found that the overall incidence of AVN after PFNF was 22% in the 30 studies that were included, which was comparable to the two previously reported studies with large sample sizes [10, 11]. Subgroup analyses showed that the year of publication, geographic locale of the populations studies, and sample size of the literature may be reasons for the large variations seen in the incidence of AVN. In addition, stratified analyses showed that the Delbet fracture type and the age of patients were critical risk factors for AVN after PFNF, while the time to treatment was not. These findings may help inform treatment decisions after adolescent femoral neck fractures.

In our study, we found that adolescents older than 12 years were 1.61 times more likely to develop AVN than adolescents younger than 12 years (P = 0.02). Several clinical studies in recent years have also confirmed our findings [10, 25]. The reasons for this difference are mostly believed to be related to the vascular distribution of the proximal femur in children of different ages and the reconstructing ability of children [25, 46, 47]. We believe that the reason for this discrepancy may be related to the fact that the older the age group, the more active the adolescent is and thus more vulnerable to greater violence of injury.

Whether the Delbet fracture type is correlated with the incidence of AVN has been a controversial topic among surgeons. Reporting on the long-term follow-up of 61 children, Emre et al. [38] proposed that the severity of the initial trauma of the fracture is closely related to the incidence of AVN. Moon et al. [48], in their meta-analysis, found fracture type to be the most important predictor of AVN. Ulukan et al. [16] conducted a retrospective study of 39 patients and found that the type of reduction was not significantly related to the incidence of AVN, although the type of fracture was correlated with AVN occurrence, as was also reported by several subsequent studies [12, 17]. In our study, Delbet type of fractures was also found to be an important risk factor for AVN after PFNF, and the pooled necrosis rate of Delbet type I-II fractures was as high as 45% and 32%, respectively. Therefore, vigilance is particularly needed when we encounter these two types of fractures in clinical practice.

This study has limitations that should be noted. First, a large degree of heterogeneity was detected between different studies, which may be related to small sample sizes, differing inclusion criteria, large time span, variability in treatment, and other differences, resulting in variation in results between the studies. Second, in our study, the subgroup analysis included a relatively small number of studies and had limited power to make accurate conclusions. We believe that the occurrence of necrosis after fracture may depend more on the injury itself; therefore, we have not studied some risk factors that occur after injury. Third, the factors reported in the studies were not always consistent, and some studies did not adjust for confounders, which may have influenced the pooled results.

Conclusions

In summary, our meta-analysis showed that the pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF was ~ 22% and suggests that patient age and Delbet fracture classification are important factors affecting AVN after PFNF; conversely, the evidence at present does not indicate an association between the time to treatment and the rate of AVN in adolescents. However, our study is based on the results obtained from previously reported observational studies and needs to be confirmed by large-sample multicenter studies.

Availability of data and materials

The authors declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.

Abbreviations

AVN:

Avascular necrosis

PFNF:

Pediatric femoral neck fracture

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

IHE:

Institute of Health Economics

MOOSE:

Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis

References

  1. Ratliff AH. Avascular necrosis of the head of the femur, after fractures of the femoral neck in children, and Perthes’ disease. Proc R Soc Med. 1962;55:504–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Davison BL, Weinstein SL. Hip fractures in children: a long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12(3):355–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mirdad T. Fractures of the neck of femur in children: an experience at the Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia. Inj Int J Care Inj. 2002;33(9):823–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Forlin E, Guille JT, Kumar SJ, Rhee KJ. Complications associated with fracture of the neck of the femur in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;12(4):503–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bagatur AE, Zorer G. Complications associated with surgically treated hip fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2002;11(3):219–28.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ju L, Jiang B, Lou Y, Zheng P. Delayed treatment of femoral neck fractures in 58 children: open reduction internal fixation versus closed reduction internal fixation. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2016;25(5):459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Migliorini F, La Padula G, Oliva F, Torsiello E, Hildebrand F, Maffulli N. Operative management of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review. Life (Basel). 2022;12(2):179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sadile F, Bernasconi A, Russo S, Maffulli N. Core decompression versus other joint preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a meta-analysis. Br Med Bull. 2016;118(1):33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Song KS, Kim YS, Sohn SW, Ogden JA. Arthrotomy and open reduction of the displaced fracture of the femoral neck in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2001;10(3):205–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang WT, Li YQ, Guo YM, Li M, Mei HB, Shao JF, et al. Risk factors for the development of avascular necrosis after femoral neck fractures in children: a review of 239 cases. Bone Jt J. 2019;101-B(9):1160–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yeranosian M, Horneff JG, Baldwin K, Hosalkar HS. Factors affecting the outcome of fractures of the femoral neck in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Bone Jt J. 2013;95-B(1):135–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spence D, DiMauro JP, Miller PE, Glotzbecker MP, Hedequist DJ, Shore BJ. Osteonecrosis after femoral neck fractures in children and adolescents: analysis of risk factors. J Pediatr Orthop. 2016;36(2):111–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang W, Li Y, Guo Y, Li M, Mei H, Shao J, et al. Initial displacement as a risk factor for avascular necrosis of the femoral head in pediatric femoral neck fractures: a review of one hundred eight cases. Int Orthop. 2020;44(1):129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shrader MW, Jacofsky DJ, Stans AA, Shaughnessy WJ, Haidukewych GJ. Femoral neck fractures in pediatric patients—30 years experience at a level 1 trauma center. Clin Orthop Relat R. 2007;454:169–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Varshney MK, Kumar A, Khan SA, Rastogi S. Functional and radiological outcome after delayed fixation of femoral neck fractures in pediatric patients. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10(4):211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inan U, Kose N, Omeroglu H. Pediatric femur neck fractures: a retrospective analysis of 39 hips. J Child Orthop. 2009;3(4):259–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. AlKhatib N, Younis MH, Hegazy A, Ibrahim T. Early versus late treatment of paediatric femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2018;43:677–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021;74(9):790–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ratliff AH. Fractures of the neck of the femur in children. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1962;44-B:528–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chuling F, Hui H, Zuojun X. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies. 2016.

  22. Guo B, Moga C, Harstall C, Sehopflocher D. A principal component analysis is conducted for a case series quality appraisal checklist. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2013.

  24. Stuck AE, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. 1998.

  25. Li Y, Sun D, Wang K, Liu J, Wang Z, Liu Y. Postoperative avascular necrosis of the femoral head in pediatric femoral neck fractures. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(5):e0268058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu C, Ning B, Xu P, Song J, Wang D. Efficacy and complications after delayed fixation of femoral neck fractures in children. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020;28(1):2309499019889682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dai ZZ, Zhang ZQ, Ding J, Wu ZK, Yang X, Zhang ZM, et al. Analysis of risk factors for complications after femoral neck fracture in pediatric patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu LY, Wang LL, Gao ST, Xing QS, Zhang XD, Li SB, et al. Efficacy of anterior dynamic pried reduction technique combined with crane frame external fixation for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in adolescent. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9(3):6675–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Qi B, Yu A, Zhang G, Yu G, Shi Y, Zhu S, et al. The treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures with vascularized great trochanter periosteal flap transposition in children. Microsurgery. 2008;28(1):21–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheng JC, Tang N. Decompression and stable internal fixation of femoral neck fractures in children can affect the outcome. J Pediatr Orthop. 1999;19(3):338–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lam SF. Fractures of the neck of the femur in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1971;53(6):1165–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stone JD, Hill MK, Pan Z, Novais EN. Open reduction of pediatric femoral neck fractures reduces osteonecrosis risk. Orthopedics. 2015;38(11):e983–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Riley PM Jr, Morscher MA, Gothard MD, Riley PM Sr. Earlier time to reduction did not reduce rates of femoral head osteonecrosis in pediatric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(5):231–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Flynn JM, Wong KL, Yeh GL, Meyer JS, Davidson RS. Displaced fractures of the hip in children. Management by early operation and immobilisation in a hip spica cast. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2002;84(1):108–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Canale ST, Bourland WL. Fracture of the neck and intertrochanteric region of the femur in children. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1977;59(4):431–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Singh KA, Chandankere V, Shah H. Does the timing of treatment affect complications of pediatric femoral neck fractures? J Orthop. 2020;22:207–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bali K, Sudesh P, Patel S, Kumar V, Saini U, Dhillon MS. Pediatric femoral neck fractures: our 10 years of experience. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3(4):302–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Togrul E, Bayram H, Gulsen M, Kalaci A, Ozbarlas S. Fractures of the femoral neck in children: long-term follow-up in 62 hip fractures. Injury. 2005;36(1):123–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bukva B, Abramovic D, Vrgoc G, Marinovic M, Bakota B, Ducic S, et al. Femoral neck fractures in children and the role of early hip decompression in final outcome. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 6):S44–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hajdu S, Oberleitner G, Schwendenwein E, Ringl H, Vecsei V. Fractures of the head and neck of the femur in children: an outcome study. Int Orthop. 2011;35(6):883–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Dendane MA, Amrani A, El AZ, El MT, Gourinda H. Displaced femoral neck fractures in children: are complications predictable? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(2):161–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mirdad T. Fractures of the neck of femur in children: an experience at the Aseer Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia. Injury. 2002;33(9):823–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Morsy HA. Complications of fracture of the neck of the femur in children. A long-term follow-up study. Injury. 2001;32(1):45–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pape HC, Krettek C, Friedrich A, Pohlemann T, Simon R, Tscherne H. Long-term outcome in children with fractures of the proximal femur after high-energy trauma. J Trauma. 1999;46(1):58–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ng GP, Cole WG. Effect of early hip decompression on the frequency of avascular necrosis in children with fractures of the neck of the femur. Injury. 1996;27(6):419–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ogden JA. Changing patterns of proximal femoral vascularity. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(5):941–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Patterson JT, Tangtiphaiboontana J, Pandya NK. Management of pediatric femoral neck fracture. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(12):411–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moon ES, Mehlman CT. Risk factors for avascular necrosis after femoral neck fractures in children: 25 Cincinnati cases and meta-analysis of 360 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(5):323–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Professor Lianbo Xiao and his team members for their guidance and support for this article.

Funding

This study was supported by the Shanghai 13th Five-Year Key Specialized College—Department of Osteoarthritis and Arthritis of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (shslczdzk04801), the project of Shanghai Nature Fund (22ZR1453100), and the construction of key areas of clinical highland of traditional Chinese medicine in Shanghai (ZY(2021-2023)-0201-06).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Pengfei Xin and Ziqi Li have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Pengfei Xin, Shaoqiang Pei & Qi Shi

  2. The Third Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

    Ziqi Li

  3. Arthritis Research Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China

    Qi Shi & Lianbo Xiao

  4. Department of Orthopedics, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 20000, China

    Lianbo Xiao

Authors
  1. Pengfei Xin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ziqi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shaoqiang Pei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lianbo Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All five authors were responsible for the design of this review. XPF and LZQ contributed to conceptualization, data collection, and data analysis and interpretation; XPF and PSQ were involved in literature review and search; XPF contributed to manuscript preparation and editing; and SQ and XLB were involved in supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qi Shi or Lianbo Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Search strategy.

Additional file 2:

Sensitivity analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xin, P., Li, Z., Pei, S. et al. The incidence and risk factors for femoral head necrosis after femoral neck fracture in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 18, 22 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03502-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03502-4

Keywords

  • Femoral head necrosis
  • Femoral neck fracture
  • Pediatric
  • Incidence
  • Risk factors
  • Meta-analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X