Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Intercondylar notch volume in patients with posterior cruciate ligament tears and tibial avulsion injuries: a study applying computed tomography

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 17, Article number: 560 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Two relatively common forms of injury exist in the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) after the onset of trauma: PCL tear and tibial avulsion fracture. The mechanism for the occurrence of these different forms of injury is not known. Herein, we aimed to investigate this mechanism by comparing the intercondylar notch parameters between patients with PCL tears and those with PCL avulsion fractures of the tibial insertion.

Methods

Fifty-three patients with PCL tears (37 male, 16 female: median age of 37 years: range 18–54 years) and 46 patients with avulsion fractures of tibial insertion (33 male, 13 female: median age of 33 years: range 18–55 years) were included in this study. Three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) was applied to measure the intercondylar notch width index and intercondylar notch volume. The intercondylar notch volume was simulated as the truncated-pyramid shape. Measurements of the top and bottom areas of this model were conducted on the slice containing the most proximal (S1) and most distal (S2) levels of Blumensaat’s line. Femoral condyle height (h) was defined as the vertical distance between two parallel planes, and the volume was calculated as h(S1 + S2 + √(S1S2))/3. The values of S1, S2, h, notch volume, the body mass index (BMI), intercondylar notch width (NW), femoral condylar width (FW) and notch width index (NWI) were compared among the PCL tear and avulsion-fracture groups.

Results

The results show a significant difference in the S2 and normalized intercondylar notch volumes among patients with PCL tears and tibial avulsion injuries. Patients with PCL tears have smaller S2 and intercondylar notch volumes than those with tibial avulsion. There were no significant differences between the two groups in S1 or the 2D notch measurement parameters, such as the NW, FW and NWI. In addition, logistic regression analysis revealed notch volume and body mass index (BMI) as two significant independent predictors for PCL tears.

Conclusion

Decreased intercondylar notch volume and increased BMI are associated with an increased incidence of PCL tears. The occurrence of PCL tears and tibial avulsion injuries is influenced by the femoral intercondylar notch volume, and the measurement of the notch volume could be useful for identifying patients at risk for PCL tears.

Introduction

The exact incidence of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) lesions requires further study and has been reported to range from 1 to 40% of all knee injuries [1, 2]. The PCL is the main restraining structure for posterior tibial translation, and the absence of the PCL, like the absence of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), may lead to subsequent meniscal and cartilage injuries and a rapid development of osteoarthritis, especially in young and active patients [3,4,5,6].

Particular knee morphologic risk factors have been reported to correlate with ACL and PCL injuries [7, 8]. Morphologic studies conducted on PCL injuries are limited, and among these potential risk factors is the controversial intercondylar femoral notch [9, 10]. By applying standard models of the knee established in Rosenberg and anteroposterior radiographic views, van Kuijk et al. found that a smaller and more sharply angled intercondylar notch is associated with PCL injury [9]. In contrast, the results of an MRI study, which was conducted by Liu Fei et al., suggested that a stenotic intercondylar notch is not a risk factor for PCL injury [10].

In the past, researchers have regularly applied two-dimensional (2D) indicators such as the notch width index (NWI) to describe the morphology of intercondylar notches [11]. However, the intercondylar notch is a complex three-dimensional (3D) space, and the 2D notch measurement parameters may be plane and location specific [12]. Therefore, the application of 2D parameters to characterize the 3D structure of the intercondylar notch may be inadequate. Several studies have shown that the intercondylar notch volume, as a 3D parameter, is a superior indicator [12,13,14].

Measurement of the volume of the intercondylar notch is a complicated operational project. Iriuchishima et al. proposed a method to simulate the volume of the intercondylar notch with a truncated-pyramid shape, which is a creative idea [15, 16]. With this approach to measurement, they investigated intercondylar notches with a different morphology of Blumensaat's line and patients with and without ACL tears [15, 16]. In fact, these efforts demonstrate the reliability of their method.

As the traumatic process experienced by patients with tibial avulsion fractures is nearly identical to that of patients with PCL tears [17], patients with PCL tibial avulsion fractures were selected as the control group for this study. The aim of the present study was to use thin-layer computed tomography (CT) to compare the intercondylar notch parameters between patients with PCL tears and those with PCL avulsion fractures of the tibial insertion. The authors hypothesize that there would be a significant difference between patients with PCL tears and those with tibial avulsion injuries.

Materials and methods

The requirement to obtain informed consent from participants was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Third Hospital Hebei Medical University.

Fifty-three patients who were treated surgically for primary PCL tears (37 male, 16 female: median age of 37 years: range 18–54 years) and 46 patients with avulsion fractures of the tibial insertion (33 male, 13 female: median age of 33 years: range 18–55 years) at our hospital were included in this study. The exclusion criteria were multiple ligament injuries, previous surgery on the affected knee, osteoarthritis Outerbridge scale ≥ grade 3, revision PCL surgery and significant osteoporosis diagnosis. The demographics of the patients are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics among the PCL tear and avulsion fracture group
Full size table

Computed tomography measurement

All thin-section CT scans of participants were performed with a 64-slice CT scanner (Somatom Sensation 64, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Mimics Research (Version 21.0.0.406) software was used to perform the 3D reconstruction, position adjustment, reslicing and measurement of the images. The image position on the sagittal view of the 3D-CT was adjusted to match the shape of the medial and lateral femoral condyles to the maximal extent. Measurements of the indicators were performed by two board-certified arthroscopic surgeons using a blinded method. The observers performed the measurements two times each, and the average was used as the data.

The intercondylar notch volume was measured according to the method described by Iriuchishima et al. [15, 16]. In brief, after determining the long axis of the sagittal femoral bone, axial femoral intercondylar notch areas (top and bottom surface area of the truncated pyramidal) were measured at the height of the most proximal (S1) and most distal end (S2) of Blumensaat’s line. The posterior edge of the intercondylar notch is defined as the point where the slope changes abruptly on the medial and lateral femoral condyles. By outlining the intercondylar notch and connecting the posterior edge of the intercondylar notch with a straight line, the axial notch area was measured. The height of the truncated pyramidal shape was the height of the intercondylar notch. The volume was calculated as volume (mm3) = h(S1 + S2 +√(S1S2))/3 insert (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Axial femoral intercondylar notch area measurement in the posterior view of a right femoral condyle. Axial femoral intercondylar notch areas were measured at the most proximal and most distal height of Blumensaat’s line. When calculating the volume of the truncated pyramid shape, the proximal (*) and distal area (**) were regarded as the upper and lower base (S1 and S2) and the height (h) of the truncated pyramidal shape was the height of the intercondylar notch

Full size image

The NWI was obtained by dividing the notch width (NW) by the femoral condyle width (FW). This measurement was based on the method described by Stein et al. and Alentorn et al. [18, 19]. On the coronal plane showing the popliteal groove, a tangent to the distal end of the femoral condyles and a line vertical to this tangent were established. The intercondylar depth was defined as the vertical distance from the top of the intercondylar notch to the tangent line. At the upper third of the intercondylar depth, parallel to the tangent line, the NW and FW were measured (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Measurement of the intercondylar notch in the posterior view of a right femoral condyle. The green line represents the tangent line of the distal end of the femoral condyle. The yellow line represents the intercondylar depth. The red line represents the intercondylar notch width (NW)

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), version 26, and the P value for statistical significance was set at < 0.05. S1, S2, h, notch volume, NW, FW, NWI and notch volume/body height were compared between the PCL tear and tibial avulsion groups. The results of inter- and intraobserver reliability were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

The Shapiro‒Wilk test and the Levene test were applied for data normality and homogeneity of variance tests. Student’s t test was applied to variables (S1, S2, h, notch volume and FW) that met the two conditions, and nonparametric variables (NW, NWI and notch volume/body height) were compared using the Mann‒Whitney U test (Table 2). Binary logistic regression was applied to determine the significant independent predictors of ligament tears.

Table 2 Comparison of the morphological characteristics of the PCL tear and avulsion fracture groups
Full size table

Results

Patient demographics

No significant difference was determined between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, such as age and sex. The same was observed in terms of height and weight. However, the body mass index (BMI) in the PCL tear group was significantly higher than that in the tibial avulsion group (Table 1).

Computed tomography measurement

There were no significant differences between the two groups in the two-dimensional (2D) notch measurement parameters, such as NW, FW and NWI. S2 in the PCL tear group (287.93 ± 75.22 mm2, P = 0.001) was significantly smaller than that in the tibial avulsion group (339.08 ± 70.78 mm2). However, no significant difference was found in S1 and h between the two groups.

Although the results of this study could not be considered significantly different with respect to volume comparisons (P = 0.051), after normalization by body height, the results suggested significant differences (Table 2 and Fig. 3). In addition, the logistic regression analysis revealed notch volume (OR = − 0.21, P = 0.03) and BMI (OR = 0.12, P = 0.022) as two significant independent predictors for ligament tears (Table 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Violin plot demonstrated the differences in the parameter notch volume/body height of the two groups

Full size image
Table 3 Odds ratio and P value of the logistic regression analysis for predictor variables
Full size table

Intra- and interobserver reliability are shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Results expressed as the ICC (95% CI) of the inter- and intraobserver reliability analysis
Full size table

Discussion

The most important finding of the present study was that decreased notch volume and increased BMI were risk factors for PCL tears during injuries. After normalizing the results with body height, the indicator notch volume/body height was significantly smaller among patients with PCL tears than among those with avulsion fractures. Furthermore, the area of the bottom (distal portion) of the truncated pyramid was significantly smaller in patients with PCL tears than in patients with avulsion fractures, which may account for the difference in results.

An X-ray study conducted by Mininder et al. concluded that the NWI was significantly smaller in children and adolescents with ACL tears than in patients with avulsion fractures [20]. The NWI is a widely accepted and recognized 2D indicator for measuring the intercondylar notch with high sensitivity [14, 21]. However, according to the results of this study, there was no significant difference in NWIs between patients with PCL tears and those with avulsion fractures. It is possible that for patients with PCL injury, the NWI does not describe the intercondylar notch as sufficiently as it does ACL. To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the morphological differences between PCL tears and avulsion fractures. This result is all the more convincing because the patients have experienced an extremely similar mechanism of injury [17].

Intercondylar notch volume, as a 3D indicator, has been supported by some published studies to describe intercondylar notch morphology precisely [12, 15]. However, to calculate notch volume, the clinician may have to measure the notch area from all slices, which implies a large workload [13, 15, 16]. This makes it unworkable for the daily clinical routine. The simulation of the intercondylar notch volume as a truncated-pyramid shape proposed by Iriuchishima et al. largely changed this situation [15, 16]. Although the accurate notch volume was not measured directly, the significant advantage of this methodology was that the volume measurement could be simulated using the notch height and the upper and lower base areas only. Their subsequent research on the effect of Blumensaat's line on the volume of the intercondylar notch also showed that this is a reliable simulation method [16].

It is known that there is a positive correlation between the volumes of the intercondylar notch, PCL and ACL [14]. The results of this study indicated that when injury occurs, individuals with smaller ligament volumes were more likely to develop PCL tears, while individuals with larger PCL volumes tended to develop avulsion fractures. Based on these findings, we hypothesize that the smaller PCLs are injured because of the smaller force they can withhold, while avulsion fractures occur in patients with larger ligaments because the force that the PCLs can withhold is greater than the strength of the tibial attachment area.

The injury mechanism of PCL tears and tibial avulsion is remarkably similar [17], and in many cases, the injury is the result of a posteriorly directed force acting on the proximal tibia [22]. The difference, however, is that tibial avulsion is mostly caused by two-wheeler accidents, a form of injury that is rare in the Western world [1, 2, 23], which means that there are subtle discrepancies in the external forces applied at the time of trauma. Limited studies have been conducted on PCL tibial avulsion, and the specific causes of the injury still need to be further investigated. Significant differences in the indicator of BMI may influence the forces exerted on the PCL. This appears to be consistent with previous studies showing that slower loading rates could preferentially result in tibial avulsion fracture [20, 24]. However, based on current knowledge, it seems difficult to explain the influence of BMI in the process of injury.

A further understanding of anatomical variants is the basis for screening individuals susceptible to PCL injury and individualized ligament surgery [7, 8, 25]. A meta-analysis presented by Yulun et al. reported that ACL injury prevention programs can significantly reduce injury rates [26]. There appear to be no prevention programs for PCL injury, but only as basic research progresses will these programs emerge [14]. The volume of the intercondylar notch can be modified intraoperatively by intercondylar notchplasty [27, 28]; however, the surgeon cannot change the size of the ligament. It is not clear whether this intervention can prevent PCL injury or reduce the rate of postoperative reinjury, and future studies are still needed.

The principal limitations of this study were as follows: (1) the total number of patients involved in this study was only 99 individuals. Due to the low incidence of tibial avulsion fractures, no matching for sex and age was performed with the PCL tear group. Owing to anatomical variability, studies with larger sample sizes are needed. (2) The study was retrospective in nature and only evaluated patients with PCL lesions in Hebei Province, China. Studies that take the variability across regions and ethnicities into account are needed.

Conclusion

Decreased intercondylar notch volume and increased BMI were associated with an increased incidence of PCL tears. The occurrence of PCL tears and tibial avulsion injuries is influenced by the femoral intercondylar notch volume, and the measurement of the notch volume can be useful for identifying patients at risk for PCL tears. Clinical Relevance: Identification of morphological risk factors can help to reduce injuries in individuals at high risk for PCL ruptures or even to reduce the rate of recurrence after PCL reconstruction.

Availability of data and materials

The data of this work are available on request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

PCL:

Posterior cruciate ligament

ACL:

Anterior cruciate ligament

LFC:

Lateral femoral condyle

MFC:

Medial femoral condyle

3D:

Three-dimensional

2D:

Two-dimensional

CT:

Computed tomography

S 1 :

Intercondylar notch area of the slice containing the most proximal level of Blumensaat’s line

S 2 :

Intercondylar notch area of the slice containing the most distal level of Blumensaat’s line

h :

Femoral condyle height

NW:

Intercondylar notch width

FW:

Femoral condylar width

NWI:

Notch width index

BMI:

Body mass index

V:

Intercondylar notch volume

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Schlumberger M, Schuster P, Eichinger M, Mayer P, Mayr R, Immendörfer M, Richter J. Posterior cruciate ligament lesions are mainly present as combined lesions even in sports injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:2091–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hooper PO 3rd, Silko C, Malcolm TL, Farrow LD. Management of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion injuries: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:734–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arøen A, Sivertsen EA, Owesen C, Engebretsen L, Granan LP. An isolated rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament results in reduced preoperative knee function in comparison with an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:1017–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Winkler PW, Hughes JD, Irrgang JJ, Karlsson J, Musahl V. Posterior cruciate ligament injuries: what do we really know. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:669–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deng Z, Li Y, Lin Z, Zhu Y, Zhao R. The biomechanical and histological effects of posterior cruciate ligament rupture on the medial tibial plateau. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandrasekaran S, Scarvell JM, Buirski G, Woods KR, Smith PN. Sagittal plane articulation of the contralateral knee of subjects with posterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an observational study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7:12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernhardson AS, DePhillipo NN, Daney BT, Kennedy MI, Aman ZS, LaPrade RF. Posterior tibial slope and risk of posterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47:312–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bayer S, Meredith SJ, Wilson KW, de Sa D, Pauyo T, Byrne K, McDonough CM, Musahl V. Knee morphological risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2020;102:703–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van Kuijk K, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Waarsing JH, Meuffels DE. Posterior cruciate ligament injury is influenced by intercondylar shape and size of tibial eminence. Bone Jt J. 2019;101-B:1058–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu F, Zhang S, Xiao Y, Feng X, Liang Z, Leung F, Chen B. Stenotic intercondylar notch is not a risk factor for posterior cruciate ligament rupture: a morphological analyses using magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:1711–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang C, Zhang X, Fang Z, Wang F, Yuan F, Xie G, Zhao J. The correlation between common 2D femoral notch parameters and 3D notch volume: a retrospective MRI study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jha V, Pandit A. Notch volume measured on magnetic resonance imaging is better than 2-dimensional notch parameters for predicting noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in males. Arthroscopy. 2021;37:1534-43.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van Eck CF, Martins CA, Lorenz SG, Fu FH, Smolinski P. Assessment of correlation between knee notch width index and the three-dimensional notch volume. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1239–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Kuijk K, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Meuffels DE. Smaller intercondylar notch size and smaller ACL volume increase posterior cruciate ligament rupture risk. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022.

  15. Iriuchishima T, Goto B, Fu FH. Truncated-pyramid shape simulation for the measurement of femoral intercondylar notch volume can detect the volume difference between ACL-injured and intact subjects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:1709–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Iriuchishima T, Goto B, Byrne K, Fu FH. Knees with straight Blumensaat’s line have small volume of femoral intercondylar notch. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. White EA, Patel DB, Matcuk GR, Forrester DM, Lundquist RB, Hatch GF 3rd, Vangsness CT, Gottsegen CJ. Cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: anatomy, biomechanics, injury patterns, and approach to management. Emerg Radiol. 2013;20:429–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alentorn-Geli E, Pelfort X, Mingo F, Lizano-Díez X, Leal-Blanquet J, Torres-Claramunt R, Hinarejos P, Puig-Verdié L, Monllau JC. An evaluation of the association between radiographic intercondylar notch narrowing and anterior cruciate ligament injury in men: the notch angle is a better parameter than notch width. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:2004–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stein V, Li L, Guermazi A, Zhang Y, Kent Kwoh C, Eaton CB, Hunter DJ. OAI Investigators. The relation of femoral notch stenosis to ACL tears in persons with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18:192–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kocher MS, Mandiga R, Klingele K, Bley L, Micheli LJ. Anterior cruciate ligament injury versus tibial spine fracture in the skeletally immature knee: a comparison of skeletal maturation and notch width index. J Pediatr Orthop. 2004;24:185–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ficek K, Rajca J, Cholewiński J, Racut A, Gwiazdoń P, Przednowek K, Hajduk G. Analysis of intercondylar notch size and shape in patients with cyclops syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Winkler PW, Zsidai B, Wagala NN, Hughes JD, Horvath A, Senorski EH, Samuelsson K, Musahl V. Evolving evidence in the treatment of primary and recurrent posterior cruciate ligament injuries, part 1: anatomy, biomechanics and diagnostics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:672–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Katsman A, Strauss EJ, Campbell KA, Alaia MJ. Posterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11:503–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Noyes FR, DeLucas JL, Torvik PJ. Biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament failure: an analysis of strain-rate sensitivity and mechanisms of failure in primates. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1974;56:236–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Swart E, Redler L, Fabricant PD, Mandelbaum BR, Ahmad CS, Wang YC. Prevention and screening programs for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in young athletes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014;96:705–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang YL, Jung J, Mulligan C, Oh J, Norcross MF. A majority of anterior cruciate ligament injuries can be prevented by injury prevention programs: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cluster-randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48:1505–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dahlstedt L, Dalén N, Dahlborn M, Nilsson T. Value of intercondylar notch plasty. CT studies and peroperative measurements of 127 knees. Acta Orthop Scand. 1990;61:558–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Freychet B, Lakhal W, Daggett M, Bonnard C. Intercondylar notch dysplasia in open-physis anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a case-control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102:203–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This study was funded by Hebei Provincial Health Commission (20190643) and the Excellent Talent Project of Hebei Provincial Health Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050051, China

    Wen-Tao Huang, Kai Kang, Tong Li, Han Wang & Shi-Jun Gao

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Rongcheng People’s Hospital, Weihai, Shandong, 264300, China

    Jin-Yu Yang

  3. Department of Ophthalmology, Shidao People’s Hospital Of Rongcheng, Weihai, Shandong, 264308, China

    Hui Sun

Authors
  1. Wen-Tao Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kai Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jin-Yu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hui Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Han Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shi-Jun Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WH is responsible for the study design, definition of intellectual content, manuscript preparation; KK, and TL are responsible for the data acquisition and analysis, statistical analysis; JY, HS and HW are responsible for the literature research and explanation of the results; SG is responsible for the guarantor of integrity of the entire study and study concepts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shi-Jun Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The requirement to obtain informed consent from participants was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study. The study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Third Hospital Hebei Medical University (2022-078-1).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, WT., Kang, K., Yang, JY. et al. Intercondylar notch volume in patients with posterior cruciate ligament tears and tibial avulsion injuries: a study applying computed tomography. J Orthop Surg Res 17, 560 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03451-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03451-4

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X