Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Age-related changes in mechanical properties of semitendinosus tendon used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 17, Article number: 501 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hamstring tendons are a popular choice for autografts in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, there is increasing evidence that hamstring tendon autografts carry a high risk of revision and residual instability in young patients. To elucidate the reasons for the inferior outcome of the reconstructed ACL with hamstring tendon autografts in young patients, we investigated the Young’s modulus and the extent of cyclic loading-induced slackening of the semitendinosus tendon used for ACL reconstruction across a broad range of ages.

Methods

Twenty-six male patients (aged 17–53 years), who were scheduled for ACL reconstruction surgery using the semitendinosus tendon autograft, participated in this study. The distal portion of the harvested semitendinosus tendon, which was not used to construct the autograft, was used for cyclic tensile testing to calculate the Young’s modulus and the extent of slackening (i.e., increase in slack length).

Results

Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the Young’s modulus of the semitendinosus tendon was positively correlated with the patient’s age (ρ = 0.559, P = 0.003). In contrast, the extent of tendon slackening did not correlate with the patient’s age.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the Young’s modulus of the semitendinosus tendon increases with age, indicating that the semitendinosus tendon used for ACL reconstruction is compliant in young patients.

Background

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most commonly injured knee ligament, and 175,000–200,000 patients undergo ACL reconstruction surgery every year in the USA alone [1]. Hamstring tendons, primarily using the semitendinosus (ST) tendon, with additional gracilis tendon if necessary, are a popular choice for autografts in ACL reconstruction, owing to their easy harvesting technique, low harvest site morbidity, and mechanical superiority [2, 3]. ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft is usually successful and satisfactory. However, there is increasing evidence that hamstring tendon autografts carry high risks of revision and residual instability in young patients [4,5,6,7,8,9]. For example, patients aged less than 20 years [4] or 25 years [5] are shown to be at risk of revision after ACL reconstruction using the hamstring tendon. In addition, a recent systematic review reported that young age is the most consistent factor for failure of ACL reconstruction [6]. It has been suggested that higher failure rates in younger patients could be attributable to higher postoperative active levels [7], while the risk of hamstring autograft failure is suggested to be independent of individual’s activity levels [5]. Taken together, it remains unclear why young patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts show an inferior outcome.

One of the reasons for the inferior outcome of ACL reconstruction in young patients would be associated with the age-related difference in the mechanical properties of the graft used for ACL reconstruction. Several in vivo human studies have compared the mechanical properties of tendons, including the Achilles [10] and patellar tendons [11, 12], between children (approximately 10–18 years old) and young adults, and reported that the Young’s modulus (a fundamental parameter that characterizes the stiffness of a material, expressed in Pascal) of the tendon was lower in children than in adults. In contrast, it has been recently reported that the Young’s modulus of hamstring tendons harvested during ACL reconstruction is significantly higher in younger patients (≤ 20 years) than older patients (> 20 years) [13]. The discrepant findings between the previous studies are attributable at least partly to the differences in tendons tested [14] and the sex of the subjects [15]. Particularly regarding the latter, age-related changes in tendon mechanical properties have been reported to vary between males and females [15]. Nevertheless, in the previous study [13], the Young’s modulus of hamstring tendons harvested during ACL reconstruction has been examined in a mixed population of males and females. An advanced understanding of the age-related changes in the Young’s modulus of the hamstring tendon used for ACL reconstruction in a single-sex population would allow for more effective surgical treatment and rehabilitation.

Several studies have indicated that the elongation of the graft used for ACL reconstruction occurs without trauma [8, 16]. To prevent such secondary graft elongation, pre-tensioning of the grafts before fixation has been recommended [17, 18]. Meanwhile, patients aged < 20 years exhibited greater postoperative knee joint laxity, probably due to graft elongation, than those aged ≥ 20 years [19]. Based on this finding, it is presumed that the ST tendon used for ACL reconstruction is more susceptible to slackening in young patients, leading to an inferior outcome of ACL reconstruction. To our knowledge, however, no studies have examined the association between patient age and susceptibility to slackening of the ST tendon used for ACL reconstruction. More specifically, although several studies emphasize the importance of cyclic tensile (i.e., repeated loading–unloading) testing when evaluating the mechanical properties of tendons [20], single load-to-failure testing has most often been used; no information is available on whether susceptibility to cyclic loading-induced tendon slackening is age-dependent.

As a first step to elucidate the reasons for the inferior outcome of the reconstructed ACL in young patients, we compared and investigated the Young’s modulus and the extent of cyclic-loading-induced slackening of the ST tendon used for ACL reconstruction across a broad range of ages in a single-sex population of males. We hypothesized that the Young’s modulus and the extent of slackening of the ST tendon used for ACL reconstruction would be smaller and greater in younger than older patients, respectively.

Methods

Subjects

Twenty-six male patients (aged 17–53 years), who were healthy except for an ACL injury and scheduled for ACL reconstruction surgery with ST tendon autograft, participated in this study. The present study introduced no selection bias in sample collection; patients who were scheduled for ACL reconstruction surgery with ST tendon autograft and agreed to participate in the present study were included. All subjects provided written informed consent prior to participation. This study was approved by our institutional ethics committee.

Preparation of specimens

The ST tendon was harvested with a standard technique using a tendon stripper after making a 3-cm skin incision to identify the ST tendon attachment during ACL reconstruction surgery. The distal portion of the harvested ST tendon (Fig. 1), which was discarded and not used to construct the autograft, was embedded in phosphate-buffered saline and stored at − 20 °C until the time of mechanical tensile testing.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Typical example of the distal portion of the harvested semitendinosus tendon specimen. A uniform thickness portion of the specimen harvested (as outlined by the solid blue line) was prepared rectangularly (i.e., uniform in width and length) for tensile testing

Full size image

Measurement

On the day of mechanical testing, the tendon specimens were first thawed at room temperature and then cleaned by removing the muscle and fatty tissues. Then, uniform-thickness portions of the specimens harvested (Fig. 1) were prepared rectangularly (i.e., uniform in width and length) for tensile testing. The lengths of the specimens shaped for tensile testing were approximately 15–20 mm. In our preliminary experiments, specimens were attached to the clamps of a material testing machine using sandpapers, according to previous studies [21]. However, substantial slippage between the clamps and sandpapers or between the sandpapers and specimens was often observed during tensile tests. In the present study, therefore, to prevent the slippage during the tensile test, both ends (approximately 3–4 mm each) of the tendon specimens were directly fixed to the clamps (FC-40-F, IMADA, Japan) of a material testing machine (EMX-1000N, IMADA, Japan) (Fig. 2A) using cyanoacrylate. Each specimen was subjected to 10 loading–unloading cycles [20] from the slack state at a speed of 2 mm/min [22]. The loading displacement was not uniform across specimens but was dependent on the stiffness of the specimen in the linear region. The loading force was measured using a force gauge (ZTA-200A, IMADA, Japan) mounted between the material testing machine and the clamp. The force and length (i.e., clamp-to-clamp distance) data were recorded at a frequency of 100 Hz (Fig. 2B). The experimenters visually confirmed that no slippage occurred during the tensile tests. These measurements were performed at a room temperature of approximately 23 °C. After the completion of the tensile test, a cross-section at the approximate midpoint of each specimen was prepared by cutting it perpendicular to the tensile direction using a microtome blade (Surgipath DB80 HS, Leica Biosystems, Germany). Then, the cross-section was captured using a high-resolution (4K) digital camera (RX100IV, Sony, Japan).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Typical examples of experimental setup (A) and data analysis process (B, C) for tensile testing. The ends of the tendon specimens were fixed to the clamps of material testing machine (A). Force and length were measured by tensile testing, and a force–length relationship was derived (B). The stress (N/mm2) was calculated by dividing the force by the cross-sectional area of the specimen, and the strain (%) was calculated by dividing the displacement (i.e., change in length) of the specimen by its initial length (C). The Young’s modulus of each specimen was calculated as the slope of the regression line in the linear region of the stress–strain curve

Full size image

Data analysis

For the mechanical testing data, the stress (N/mm2) was calculated by dividing the force by the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the specimen, and the strain (%) was calculated for each cycle by dividing the displacement (i.e., change in length) of the specimen by its initial length (Fig. 2C). The CSA of the tendon specimen was calculated using publicly available software (ImageJ, NIH, USA), and the average of the three CSA measurements was used as the representative value for each specimen. The initial length was defined as the length at the point in which a 0.1 N load was detected in each cycle (Fig. 2B). The mean initial length of the ST tendon specimens tested was 8 mm. The Young’s modulus of each specimen was also calculated for each cycle as the slope of the regression line in the linear region (the final 20% stress) of the stress–strain curve (Fig. 2C). The extent of slackening from the 2nd to the 10th cycles of each specimen was calculated according to the following equation: the extent of slackening (%) = (initial length of respective cycle − initial length of the 1st cycle)/initial length of the 1st cycle × 100. For the Young’s modulus and extent of slackening of each specimen, the average values from the 6th to the 10th cycles were used as the representative values to avoid a conditioning effect of the loading–unloading cycle on the mechanical properties of tendinous tissues [23]. However, note that the calculated extent of slackening is affected by the possible conditioning effect because the initial length of the 1st cycle is used to calculate the extent of slackening, as mentioned above. Thus, to evaluate the extent of slackening that was not affected by the possible conditioning effect, the extent of slackening was calculated based on the initial length of the 6th cycle, i.e., the extent of slackening of the 7th–10th cycles of each specimen was also calculated by the following equation: the extent of slackening (%) = (initial length of respective cycle − initial length of the 6th cycle)/initial length of the 6th cycle × 100. The average extent of slackening from the 7th to 10th cycles of each specimen was used for statistical analyses.

Statistical analysis

There were no direct data from previous studies to be referred to for a priori power analysis because none has examined the association between patient age and mechanical properties of the ST tendon across a broad range of ages. Consequently, the minimum sample size capable of detecting a statistically significant correlation was calculated with an inferred type 1 error of 0.05, a statistical power of 0.80 (type 2 error rate of 0.2), and a large effect size (0.5) using G*Power 3.1.9.4 (Kiel University, Germany). The required sample size was estimated to be 26.

The Shapiro–Wilk test did not show a normal distribution for the patient’s age (P = 0.003) and ST tendon Young’s modulus (P < 0.001). Correlations between variables were examined using nonparametric Spearman correlation coefficients. When appropriate, unequal variance unpaired t test was performed to compare the variables between the patients under and over 20 years of age. All data are reported as the mean ± SD. The significance level for all comparisons was set at P = 0.05.

Results

The characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1. The Young’s modulus of the ST tendon specimens was positively correlated with the patient’s age (ρ = 0.559, P = 0.003; Fig. 3). Although this significant correlation may seem to be due to the outlier-like data from the 53-year-old subject, the correlation remained significant even if the data were removed (n = 25, ρ = 0.504, P = 0.010). In contrast, the Young’s modulus of the ST tendon specimens was not significantly correlated with the CSA (ρ =  − 0.214, P = 0.295) or the initial length of the specimen (ρ =  − 0.071, P = 0.729). The unequal variance unpaired t test revealed a significant in the Young’s modulus difference between the patients under and over 20 years of age (under 20: 153.3 ± 38.4 MPa, over 20: 281.5 ± 188.1 MPa; P = 0.009). The extent of slackening from both the 1st and 6th cycles was not significantly correlated with patient age (Fig. 4). Physical characteristics other than the patient’s age (i.e., height, body weight, body mass index) were not significantly corrected with the Young’s modulus or the extent of slackening (Table 2).

Table 1 Characteristics of subjects
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between the Young’s modulus of the semitendinosus tendon specimen and patient age. The Young’s modulus of the ST tendon specimens was positively correlated with the patient’s age (n = 26). Note that the correlation remained significant even if an outlier-like data from the 53-year-old subject was removed (n = 25)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Relationship between the extent of slackening of the semitendinosus tendon specimen and patient age. The extent of slackening was calculated based on the initial length of the 1st (A) or 6th cycle (B). The extent of slackening from both the 1st and 6th cycles was not significantly correlated with patient age

Full size image
Table 2 Correlation coefficients between physical characteristics and semitendinosus tendon properties
Full size table

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the correlation between mechanical properties (the Young’s modulus and the extent of slackening) of the ST tendon used for ACL reconstruction and age across a broad range of ages in a single-sex population of males. One of the greatest strengths of the present study is that the tendon samples were obtained from patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. The main finding of the present study was that the Young’s modulus of the ST tendon specimen was positively correlated with the patient’s age, while the extent of slackening was not correlated with age. These findings may have important practical implications for improved surgical treatments.

The present study showed that the Young’s modulus of the tendon was positively related to age, which supports our hypothesis and contradicts the previous finding that the Young’s modulus of hamstring tendons harvested during ACL reconstruction is significantly higher in younger patients (≤ 20 years) than older patients (> 20 years) [13]. As stated in the earlier part of this paper, the discrepancy is likely due to the difference in sex of the subjects [15]. Seven males and 13 females were mixed as the subjects in the previous study, while only males were included in the present study. Our finding is consistent with previous animal [24, 25] and in vivo human studies [10,11,12] showing that the Young’s modulus of the tendinous tissues increases with increasing age, and the tendon Young’s modulus reported in the present study was within the range of in vivo human studies [10,11,12, 24, 25]. Age-related changes in the mechanical properties of tendons are reportedly associated with the collagen fibril diameter [26]. A recent study demonstrated that the cell number and collagen fibrils diameter of the ST tendon used for ACL reconstruction were different among immature (aged 10.1 ± 1.6 years), young (aged 16.7 ± 1.8 years), and adult (aged 34.6 ± 9.2 years) patients [27]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that cross-linking and glycation of tendon collagen have an impact on the Young’s modulus of the tendon, and the levels of cross-linking and glycation change with age [28,29,30]. Furthermore, it is possible that age-related variations in tendon mechanical properties are related, at least in part, to a loss of regenerative potential of the hamstring tendons with aging [31,32,33].

ACL reconstruction with a hamstring tendon autograft is at a high risk of failure or rupture in young patients [4,5,6,7,8,9]. A recent systematic review suggested that the hamstring tendon autograft diameter should be > 7 mm to prevent hamstring tendon autograft failure or rupture [9]. In contrast, another study showed a high risk of graft failure in rugby players aged < 20 years than in those aged ≥ 20 years, despite the fact that all hamstring tendon autograft diameters were greater than 7.5 mm [8]. The reason for the higher risk in younger patients despite the use of larger diameter grafts than recommended by the systematic review [9] may be related to the lower Young’s modulus of the graft in younger patients, as shown in this study. Therefore, to reduce the force applied per graft CSA and thereby reduce the displacement (i.e., change in length) of the graft under a given force, hamstring tendon autografts with a larger diameter may be helpful in improving the outcomes of ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts for younger patients. Otherwise, from the mechanical point of view, for materials with the same Young’s modulus, longer ones exhibit large displacement against a given force than shorter ones. Thus, to decrease the displacement of grafts under a given force, a graft shorter than usual may be useful in young patients.

Contrary to our hypothesis, we failed to demonstrate a significant age dependence of the extent of cyclic loading-induced slackening. Based on the findings of the present study, the greater postoperative knee joint laxity in patients aged < 20 years observed in a previous study [19] seems to be not due to greater susceptibility to slackening of the ST tendon in younger patients. Before drawing a general conclusion from this finding, however, we should note that this finding is based on 10 cycles of loading–unloading induced under ex vivo conditions and that much more loading–unloading induced under in vivo conditions may have led to different results. Nevertheless, in the present study, most of the extent of slackening occurred in the first three cycles, while the extent of slackening caused by the sixth and subsequent cycles was much smaller. Therefore, the effect of the number of loading–unloading cycles on the present findings would be small.

The present study has some limitations. First, for technical reasons, we could not measure the mechanical properties of the ST tendons immediately after harvesting. To minimize biological degradation, the tendons were stored at − 20 °C. Goh et al. [34] showed that freezing at − 20 °C had no effect on the mechanical properties of animal tendons, including the Young’s modulus, while freezing at − 80 °C led to an increase in the Young’s modulus. Second, all subjects were male. The mechanical properties of tendons differ according to sex [35]. Additionally, it has been indicated that female hormones influence the mechanical and structural properties and collagen synthesis of tendons [36, 37] and that the adaptability of tendons differs by sex [38]. Indeed, age-related changes in tendon mechanical properties have been reported to vary between males and females [15]. Thus, the present findings may not be valid for female patients. Third, the distal portion of the harvested ST tendon was used in this study. Although a cadaver study reported no significant difference in mechanical properties (Young’s modulus, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, and strain energy density) between the proximal and distal portions of the ST tendon [39], it is unknown whether the tendon specimens used in the present study represent the whole ST tendon used for ACL reconstruction. Fourth, the minimum age of the subjects in the present study was 17 years, and only five were under 20 years old. Therefore, it is practically impossible to determine from the current data whether and how the Young’s modulus of the ST tendon increases with age in young patients (i.e., those under 20 years). Further studies are required to examine these points.

Conclusion

We provide evidence that the Young’s modulus, but not the extent of slackening, increases with age. This indicates that the semitendinosus tendon used for ACL reconstruction is compliant in young patients. The findings obtained here may lead to an improved understanding of ACL reconstruction surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACL:

Anterior cruciate ligament

ST:

Semitendinosus

CSA:

Cross-sectional area

References

  1. Lynch TS, Parker RD, Patel RM, Andrish JT, Group M, Spindler KP, Amendola A, Brophy RH, Dunn WR, Flanigan DC, et al. The impact of the multicenter orthopaedic outcomes network (MOON) research on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and orthopaedic practice. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(3):154–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Smeets K, Bellemans J, Scheys L, Eijnde BO, Slane J, Claes S. Mechanical analysis of extra-articular knee ligaments. Part two: tendon grafts used for knee ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2017;24(5):957–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaerf DA, Pastides PS, Sarraf KM, Willis-Owen CA. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best practice: a review of graft choice. World J Orthop. 2014;5(1):23–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Magnussen RA, Lawrence JT, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(4):526–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamien PM, Hydrick JM, Replogle WH, Go LT, Barrett GR. Age, graft size, and Tegner activity level as predictors of failure in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(8):1808–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rahardja R, Zhu M, Love H, Clatworthy MG, Monk AP, Young SW. Factors associated with revision following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of registry data. Knee. 2020;27(2):287–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett AM, Craft JA, Replogle WH, Hydrick JM, Barrett GR. Anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a comparison of graft type based on age and Tegner activity level. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(10):2194–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takazawa Y, Ikeda H, Saita Y, Kawasaki T, Ishijima M, Nagayama M, Kaneko H, Kaneko K. Return to play of rugby players after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: return to sports and graft failure according to age. Arthroscopy. 2017;33(1):181–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alomar AZ, Nasser ASB, Kumar A, Kumar M, Das S, Mittal S. Hamstring graft diameter above 7 mm has a lower risk of failure following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;30:288–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mogi Y. The effects of growth on structural properties of the achilles and patellar tendons: a cross-sectional study. Physiol Rep. 2020;8(16):e14544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kubo K, Teshima T, Hirose N, Tsunoda N. Growth changes in morphological and mechanical properties of human patellar tendon in vivo. J Appl Biomech. 2014;30(3):415–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Brien TD, Reeves ND, Baltzopoulos V, Jones DA, Maganaris CN. Mechanical properties of the patellar tendon in adults and children. J Biomech. 2010;43(6):1190–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Naot D, Choi AJ, Street M, Pronk M, Zhao A, Thambyah A, Gao R, Cornish J, Dalbeth N, Coleman B, et al. Age-related differences in hamstring tendon used as autograft in reconstructive anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Int Orthop. 2022;46(4):845–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Butler DL, Grood ES, Noyes FR, Zernicke RF, Brackett K. Effects of structure and strain measurement technique on the material properties of young human tendons and fascia. J Biomech. 1984;17(8):579–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprague AL, Awokuse D, Pohlig RT, Cortes DH, Silbernagel KG. Relationship between mechanical properties (shear modulus and viscosity), age, and sex in uninjured Achilles tendons. Transl Sports Med. 2020;3(4):321–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wasserstein D, Khoshbin A, Dwyer T, Chahal J, Gandhi R, Mahomed N, Ogilvie-Harris D. Risk factors for recurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a population study in Ontario, Canada, with 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(9):2099–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujii M, Furumatsu T, Miyazawa S, Tanaka T, Inoue H, Kodama Y, Masuda K, Seno N, Ozaki T. Features of human autologous hamstring graft elongation after pre-tensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop. 2016;40(12):2553–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guillard C, Lintz F, Odri GA, Vogeli D, Colin F, Collon S, Chappard D, Gouin F, Robert H. Effects of graft pretensioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(11):2208–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Marchand JB, Ruiz N, Coupry A, Bowen M, Robert H. Do graft diameter or patient age influence the results of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(9):2998–3004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maganaris CN. Tendon conditioning: artefact or property? Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(Suppl 1):S39-42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Otsuka S, Yakura T, Ohmichi Y, Ohmichi M, Naito M, Nakano T, Kawakami Y. Site specificity of mechanical and structural properties of human fascia lata and their gender differences: a cadaveric study. J Biomech. 2018;77:69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hansen P, Kovanen V, Holmich P, Krogsgaard M, Hansson P, Dahl M, Hald M, Aagaard P, Kjaer M, Magnusson SP. Micromechanical properties and collagen composition of ruptured human achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(2):437–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Viidik A. Functional properties of collagenous tissues. Int Rev Connect Tissue Res. 1973;6:127–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goh KL, Holmes DF, Lu HY, Richardson S, Kadler KE, Purslow PP, Wess TJ. Ageing changes in the tensile properties of tendons: influence of collagen fibril volume fraction. J Biomech Eng. 2008;130(2):021011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lavagnino M, Gardner K, Arnoczky SP. Age-related changes in the cellular, mechanical, and contractile properties of rat tail tendons. Connect Tissue Res. 2013;54(1):70–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dressler MR, Butler DL, Wenstrup R, Awad HA, Smith F, Boivin GP. A potential mechanism for age-related declines in patellar tendon biomechanics. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(6):1315–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Asai K, Nakase J, Ishikawa T, Yoshimizu R, Kimura M, Ozaki N, Tsuchiya H. Differences in cellular and microstructural properties of the semitendinosus muscle tendon between young and adult patients. J Orthop Sci. 2022;27:478–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kjaer M. Role of extracellular matrix in adaptation of tendon and skeletal muscle to mechanical loading. Physiol Rev. 2004;84(2):649–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Stammers M, Ivanova IM, Niewczas IS, Segonds-Pichon A, Streeter M, Spiegel DA, Clark J. Age-related changes in the physical properties, cross-linking, and glycation of collagen from mouse tail tendon. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(31):10562–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Stammers M, Niewczas IS, Segonds-Pichon A, Clark J. Mechanical stretching changes crosslinking and glycation levels in the collagen of mouse tail tendon. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(31):10572–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruzzini L, Abbruzzese F, Rainer A, Longo UG, Trombetta M, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Characterization of age-related changes of tendon stem cells from adult human tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(11):2856–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Torricelli P, Veronesi F, Pagani S, Maffulli N, Masiero S, Frizziero A, Fini M. In vitro tenocyte metabolism in aging and oestrogen deficiency. Age (Dordr). 2013;35(6):2125–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Narici MV, Maffulli N, Maganaris CN. Ageing of human muscles and tendons. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(20–22):1548–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Goh KL, Chen Y, Chou SM, Listrat A, Bechet D, Wess TJ. Effects of frozen storage temperature on the elasticity of tendons from a small murine model. Animal. 2010;4(9):1613–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Gender differences in the viscoelastic properties of tendon structures. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;88(6):520–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hansen M, Couppe C, Hansen CS, Skovgaard D, Kovanen V, Larsen JO, Aagaard P, Magnusson SP, Kjaer M. Impact of oral contraceptive use and menstrual phases on patellar tendon morphology, biochemical composition, and biomechanical properties in female athletes. J Appl Physiol. 2013;114(8):998–1008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hansen M, Kongsgaard M, Holm L, Skovgaard D, Magnusson SP, Qvortrup K, Larsen JO, Aagaard P, Dahl M, Serup A, et al. Effect of estrogen on tendon collagen synthesis, tendon structural characteristics, and biomechanical properties in postmenopausal women. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106(4):1385–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Magnusson SP, Hansen M, Langberg H, Miller B, Haraldsson B, Westh EK, Koskinen S, Aagaard P, Kjaer M. The adaptability of tendon to loading differs in men and women. Int J Exp Pathol. 2007;88(4):237–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Abramowitch SD, Zhang X, Curran M, Kilger R. A comparison of the quasi-static mechanical and non-linear viscoelastic properties of the human semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010;25(4):325–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number JP20H04081 (to EMM) and the Joint Research Program of Juntendo University, Faculty of Health and Sports Science.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University, 1-1 Hiraka-Gakuendai, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1695, Japan

    Takuto Akazawa, Naokazu Miyamoto, Hirofumi Nishio, Eri Miyamoto-Mikami, Masashi Nagao & Yuji Takazawa

  2. Department of Sport Science and Research, Japan Institute of Sports Sciences, Tokyo, 3-15-1 Nishigaoka, Kita-ku, Tokyo, 115-0056, Japan

    Naokazu Miyamoto

  3. Department of Orthopaedic and Motor Organ, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan

    Hirofumi Nishio, Mayuko Kinoshita, Yohei Kobayashi, Masashi Nagao & Yuji Takazawa

  4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oji Hospital, 2-14-13, Oji, Kita-ku, Tokyo, 114-0002, Japan

    Mayuko Kinoshita & Yohei Kobayashi

  5. Medical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan

    Masashi Nagao

Authors
  1. Takuto Akazawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naokazu Miyamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hirofumi Nishio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eri Miyamoto-Mikami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mayuko Kinoshita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yohei Kobayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masashi Nagao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yuji Takazawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NM, HN, EMM, MN, and YT contributed to conceptualization; NM, HN, EMM, MN, and YT were involved in methodology; TA, NM, HN, EMM, MK, YK, MN, and YT contributed to formal analysis and investigation; TA, NM, HN, EMM, MK, YK, MN, and YT were involved in interpretation of data; TA, NM, and EMM contributed to writing—original draft; HN, MK, YK, MN, and YT were involved in writing—review and editing; and HN and EMM contributed to funding acquisition. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naokazu Miyamoto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Juntendo University School of Medicine (No. 19-225).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interested.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akazawa, T., Miyamoto, N., Nishio, H. et al. Age-related changes in mechanical properties of semitendinosus tendon used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg Res 17, 501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03395-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03395-9

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X