Skip to main content
Download PDF

Distal tibial tubercle osteotomy can lessen change in patellar height post medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 17, Article number: 341 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is a mainstream surgical method for treating early medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Undesirable sequelae such as patella infera may happen following tuberosity osteotomy. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the change in patellar position after proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy (PTO) versus distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (DTO) intervention.

Methods

The 11 studies were acquired from PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. The data were extracted by two of the coauthors independently and were analyzed by RevMan5.3. Mean differences, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle–Ottawa Scale were used to assess risk of bias.

Results

Eleven observational studies were assessed. The methodological quality of the trials ranged from moderate to high. The pooled results of postoperative patellar height (Caton-Deschamps index and Blackburne-Peel index) and postoperative complications showed that the differences were statistically significant between PTO and DTO interventions. Patellar index ratios decreased significantly in the PTO groups, and 12 (9.2%) complications under DTO surgery and 2 (1.6%) complications under PTO surgery were reported. The differences of postoperative posterior tibial slope (angle) was not statistically significant, but postoperative posterior tibial slope of both groups increased. Sensitivity analysis proved the stability of the pooled results and the publication bias was not apparent.

Conclusions

DTO in MOWHTO maintained the postoperative patellar height, and clinically, for patients with serious patellofemoral osteoarthritis, DTO can be preferred. Postoperative complications are easily preventable with caution. In view of the heterogeneity and small sample size, whether these conclusions are applicable should be further determined in future studies.

Introduction

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common degenerative disease, mainly characterized by slow progressive pain, swelling, stiffness and dysfunction of the knee joint [1]. A study that included individuals above 60 years of age in the USA has estimated the prevalence of radiographic changes consistent with KOA of the knee to be 37% [2]. At present, knee osteoarthritis cannot be completely cured. With the progression of the disease to the late stage, it has a great impact on the quality of life of patients. At this time, surgery is an effective treatment. Joint replacement is the main scheme for the treatment of severe KOA in the past. Although it can effectively reduce patients' pain and improve their joint function, it is not applicable to younger and more active patients who with minimal arthritis isolated to one medial compartment. In recent years, with the proposal of "knee preservation concept", osteotomy is more and more widely used in the treatment of KOA, mainly including medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and closed wedge high tibial osteotomy [3,4,5]. After a long time of development, MOWHTO is convenient and effective, and which has gradually become the mainstream surgical method for treating medial compartment KOA complicated with genu varus [6].

As for treatment of intraoperative tibial tubercle during MOWHTO, proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy (PTO) is a conventional surgical option [7,8,9]. However, gradually increasing patellofemoral osteoarthritis due to patella infera is reported as a common complication related to PTO [10,11,12]. In PTO, when the osteotomy surface is extended during operation, the tibial tubercle will migrate to the distal end, and the position of patella often decreases after operation. Then, patella tracking changes, which, in turn, lead to an increase in contact pressure and consequent cartilage degeneration in the PF joint. Lastly, this will affect the surgical effect of MOWHTO or remedial knee arthroplasty in future [13, 14]. The osteotomy surface of distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (DTO) is at the distal end of the tibial tubercle. Theoretically, the position of the tibial tubercle will not be changed when the osteotomy space is extended during the operation. So, it will not lead to the change of the position of the patella [15, 16]. Some studies have shown that DTO does not induce patella infera [17, 18]. Due to the different advantages and disadvantages of the above two osteotomies, there are some disputes about the choice of the two methods in clinic. This paper uses meta-analysis method to compare the postoperatively clinical safety of PTO and DTO in MOWHTO, in order to provide reference for the choice of clinical treatment strategy. According to our hypothesis, compared to biplanar ascending medial HTO, the descending HTO would preserve preoperative patellar height and posterior tibial slope parameters.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval or patient consent was not required since the present study was a review of previous published literatures.

Inclusive criteria of published studies

Types of studies

We considered all published and unpublished studies about DTO versus PTO with MOWHTO for treating knee osteoarthritis, covering randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies including retrospective and prospective studies.

Types of participants

The subjects were patients of KOA with clear diagnostic criteria and surgical indications. All patients had been diagnosed as patients of age greater than 18 years with radiographic evidence of isolated medial knee joint osteoarthritis who had failed conservative measures and were ready to accept osteotomy. There is no limit to the type of internal fixation or prosthesis used in the osteotomy. Exclusion criteria were multicompartmental arthritis; history of inflammatory arthritis; or history of prior surgery (aside from ligamentous repair) of the knee joint, distal femur, or proximal tibia.

Types of interventions

The operation method of the experimental group was DTO, and the operation method of the control group was PTO, which were considered. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) insufficient clinical outcome data in studies and (2) reviews, letters or conference articles.

Types of outcome measures

The primary outcome measures were the clinical outcomes synthesizing postoperative patellar height, and postoperative posterior tibial slope (angle). The secondary outcomes included: postoperative complications. Because the patellar height measured by Insal-Salvati method is the ratio of patellar length and patellar tendon length measured in sagittal position, while the patellar length and patellar tendon length are basically unchanged during osteotomy, which is not recommended to measure the patellar height of patients undergoing MOWHTO [19, 20]. The measurement methods of postoperative patellar height mainly include Caton-Deschamps method, Blackburne-Peel method. The normal values of Caton-Deschamps index (CDI); The normal value of Blackburne-Peel index (BPI) is 0.8 ~ 1.0, < 0.8 is the patella infera. Clinically, the patellar height is generally reduced by 10%, that is, the patellar height is significantly reduced.

Search methods for identification of studies

Four databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library) were searched using the keywords such as “Osteoarthritis, Knee/knee osteoarthritis/KOA”, “proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy/PTO”, “distal tibial tubercle osteotomy/DTO”, “tibial tubercle”, “high tibial osteotomy/HTO” and “Randomized Controled Trial/RCT” through November 2021 to collect relevant studies about the clinical comparisons of DTO versus PTO with MOWHTO for treating KOA. The titles and abstracts of potential related articles identified by the electronic search were reviewed. References from retrieved articles were also assessed to extend the search strategy.

Data collection and quality assessment

Two partners (YHD, YBS) independently assessed the titles and abstracts of all the studies screened during initial search, and they excluded any clearly irrelevant studies using the inclusion criteria. Data were independently extracted using a standard data form for the first author’s name, year of publication, sample size, gender, age, intervention, country, study design, follow-up and relevant outcome. A third partner (WYH) would handle any disagreement about inclusion of a study and reach a consensus. Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Tool [21] was manipulated for the appraisal of RCT study quality. Observational studies were assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale including 8 items [22]. A higher overall score indicates a lower risk of bias and a score of 5 or less (out of 9) corresponds to a high risk of bias.

Statistical analysis

RevMan statistical software v5.3 and Stata v16 were used for the meta-analysis. The analysis of continuous variables was conducted by mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). For a dichotomous outcome, we calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed by chi-squared and I2. A P < 0.05, I2 > 50% was considered significantly heterogeneous, and random-effect models were applied. Otherwise, fixed-effect models if there was no significant heterogeneity (P ≥ 0.05, I2 ≤ 50%). Sensitivity analysis was performed by omitting one study at a time to determine the stability of pooled results. Publication bias was determined by a funnel plot and statistically using the Egger test [23].

Results

Studies identification and inclusion

Searches conducted in the PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library, yielded a total of 217 articles. After removing duplicates, 103 literatures were remained. Based on the titles and abstracts review, 91 irrelevant articles were excluded. 12 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. However, one article was excluded based on the previously established exclusion criteria (one biomechanical study without available data). Finally, 11 observational studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The detail of selection process is listed in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

PRISMA flow diagram

Full size image

Study characteristics

We assessed 11 retrospective studies [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] in this article. The included studies were conducted in 7 countries (Japan, Germany, Korea, Singapore, Canada, Turkey and Netherlands) from 2004 to 2019, and involved 7339 patients (332 patients treated with DTO technique, 407 patients treated with PTO technique) aged 30.5 to 63.0 years. The average follow-up duration ranged from 1.5 to 48 months. The clinical outcomes of the studies were evaluated mainly based on the postoperative patellar height, postoperative posterior tibial slope (angle), and postoperative complications. The detailed information of included studies is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included
Full size table

Methodological assessment of study quality

Methodological quality assessment of the 11 included studies is presented in Table 2. Among the observational studies, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale including the exposed cohort, the non-exposed cohort, ascertainment of exposure, outcome of interest, comparability, assessment of outcome, length of follow-up and adequacy of follow-up, was used to assess the risk of bias. The scores of all 11 studies [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] were all 6 to 8, indicating a low risk of bias.

Table 2 Newcastle–Ottawa Scale of observational studies
Full size table

Comparison of Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) between DTO and PTO

Comparison of CDI between DTO and PTO was conducted among the 6 included studies [24,25,26,27,28,29], which included 522 patients (241 patients receiving DTO and 281 patients receiving PTO), as shown in Fig. 2. Heterogeneity testing showed that there was none heterogeneity among the studies (P = 0.71, I2 = 0%), so the fixed-effect model was used to pool the data from the 6 studies. The pooled result showed that the difference was statistically significant between the DTO group and the PTO group (MD = 0.05, 95% CI = 0.02–0.07, P = 0.0006).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot of comparison: Caton-Deschamps index (CDI) between proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy (PTO) versus distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (DTO) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA)

Full size image

Comparison of Blackburne-Peel index (BPI) between DTO and PTO

In Fig. 3, four included studies [24, 25, 28, 32] consisting of 315 patients (168 patients received DTO treatment and 147 patients received PTO treatment) investigated BPI. No heterogeneity among studies (P = 0.43, I2 = 0%) was found, so we used the fixed-effect model to pool the data. The overall estimate showed that the difference was statistically significant between the PTO group and the DTO group (MD = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.03–0.09, P = 0.0003).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Forest plot of comparison: Blackburne-Peel index (BPI) proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy (PTO) versus distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (DTO) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA)

Full size image

Comparison of postoperative posterior tibial slope between DTO and PTO

Comparison of postoperative posterior tibial slope between DTO and PTO treatment was conducted among 7 included studies [24, 25, 27,28,29, 32, 33] which contain 507 patients in Fig. 4. A heterogeneity test showed that there was none heterogeneity among studies (P = 0.93, I2 = 0%), so the fixed-effect model was used. The overall estimate showed that the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (MD = − 0.43, 95%CI = − 1.00–0.15, P = 0.14).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot of comparison: postoperative posterior tibial slope between proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy (PTO) versus distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (DTO) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA)

Full size image

Comparison of postoperative complications DTO and PTO

In Fig. 5, 5 included studies [28, 30,31,32, 34] consisting of 255 OA patients (130 patients received DTO and 125 patients received PTO technique) reported postoperative complications. On the whole, 12 (9.2%) complications under DTO surgery were reported and 2 (1.6%) complications under PTO surgery were reported in 5 included studies [28, 30,31,32, 34]. The major complications reported after DTO surgery included fracture of the lateral tibial plateau, tibial tuberosity fracture, delayed healing, superficial infection, and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. No heterogeneity among studies (P = 0.72, I2 = 0%) was found, so we used the fixed-effect model. The overall estimate indicated that the pooled OR was 3.63 (95%CI = 1.16–11.39, P = 0.03), suggesting that the difference was statistically significant between DTO intervention and PTO intervention.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot of comparison: postoperative complications between proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy (PTO) versus distal tibial tubercle osteotomy (DTO) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA)

Full size image

Sensitivity analysis and publication bias

We performed a sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of the pooled results. Among the most studies, the heterogeneity results were not obviously altered after sequentially omitting each study, indicating that our results were statistically reliable. The funnel plot of the included studies is shown in Fig. 6. The points in the funnel plot were almost symmetrically distributed, and Egger test P = 0.817 indicating that the publication bias was not apparent.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Funnel plot to test for publication bias. Each point represents a separate study for the indicated association. The vertical line represents the mean effects size. MD = mean difference; SE = standard error

Full size image

Discussion

Summary of main results

Postoperative patella infera is a common complication of MOWHTO with PTO [10,11,12]. The osteotomy slope of the descending MOWHTO is located on the patellar tubercle. When the osteotomy surface is extended during the operation, the tibial tubercle will migrate to the distal end, and the tibial tubercle is the attachment point of the patellar tendon. Therefore, the position of the patella often decreases after the operation [33, 35]; In addition, the greater the degree of intraoperative correction of varus deformity, the higher the possibility of patella infera after operation. The lower the position of patella, the greater the pressure of patellofemoral joint in the process of knee flexion, which is easy to accelerate the degeneration of patellofemoral joint [36]. In view of this, in recent years, the MOWHTO infra the tibial tubercle has gradually been used in the treatment of genu varus with medial compartment KOA. Theoretically, the osteotomy slope of this operation is located under the tibial tubercle. Some studies had proved that when the osteotomy space is extended during the operation, the position of the tibial tubercle will not be changed, so it will not lead to the change of the position of the patella [17, 18, 27, 28]. Through meta-analysis, this study compared the patellar height measured by Caton-Deschamps method and Blackburne-Peel method. Pooled-results showed that patellar index ratios decreased significantly in the PTO groups, and the MOWHTO above the tibial tubercle was more likely to lead to patella infera after operation.

The meta-analysis results also revealed that there is no statistically significant difference between PTO and DTO, and both PTO and DTO with MOWHTO will lead to the increase in posterior tibial slope after operation. On the current research view, the increase in postoperative posterior tibial slope will increase the tension of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), so as to accelerate the degeneration or injury of ACL. By arthroscopic view of the degenerative changes in the ACLs, Kim et al. and Ogawa et al. confirmed increased posterior tibial slope following MOWHT resulted in degenerative ACL changes. Greater body mass index and larger difference in posterior tibial slope (angle) were predisposing factors for ACL degeneration after MOWHTO [37, 38]. Ogawa et al. also found that the magnitude of change in the medial proximal tibial angle is correlated with ACL degeneration following MOWHTO, causing that the reduction of coronal tibiofemoral subluxation following MOWHTO lengthens ACL in the coronal plane and accelerated ACL degeneration [39]. What’s more, geometric changes of the joint line orientation angle, medial femoral notch to medial spine length on the coronal plane, and posterior tibial slope on the sagittal plane after OWHTO were related to ACL deterioration. The ACL was commonly affected at the middle and distal portions and rarely at the proximal portion. There is a possibility of impingement because of the geometric changes [40]. There is no unified understanding of why MOWHTO is easy to lead to the increase in postoperative posterior tibial slope. NHA et al. [41] believe that the increase in postoperative posterior tibial slope is related to the position of osteotomy spreader during MOWHTO. If the spreader is placed forward, posterior tibial slope is easy to increase after operation. Some researchers believe that after operation the increase in posterior tibial slope is related to the geometry of tibia and the position of lateral hinge [42,43,44]. Yong et al. [43] studied the relationship between the integrity of the lateral hinge and posterior tibial slope after MOWHTO by using three-dimensional CT. The results showed that in patients with posterolateral hinge fracture, the postoperative posterior tibial slope increased significantly, while in patients with complete hinge or fracture location, there was no significant difference in the change of posterior tibial slope before and after operation. Jo et al. [44] found that the position of the lateral hinge affects the change of posterior tibial slope. The lower the position of the lateral hinge, the more obvious the increase in postoperative posterior tibial slope. Ogawa et al. [26] also found that the increase in postoperative posterior tibial slope is related to the position and direction of the lateral hinge. In order to avoid the increase in posterior tibial slope after operation, the posterior osteotomy space can be maintained to be twice the anterior osteotomy space during operation, or the insertion direction of chisels can be changed and fine adjustment can be made after intraoperative fluoroscopy measurement of posterior tibial slope [37, 45].

Although the MOWHTO above the tibial tubercle is easy to lead to the postoperative patella infera, the results of Elmali’s study [32] show that post-operative hospital for special surgery knee score (HSS) scores increased significantly and there is no significant difference in HSS between the DTO group and the PTO group, indicating that the two have similar early clinically efficacy in the treatment of medial compartment KOA.

The complications in nine included studies also should be discussed. 12 (9.2%) complications under DTO surgery were reported and 2 (1.6%) complications under PTO surgery were reported in 5 included studies [28, 30,31,32, 34], which showed that PTO treatment has the lower complication rate than DTO treatment. Some studies reported that the postoperative complication rate of MOWHTO was 0 ~ 37%, and the major complications after MOWHTO surgery included superficial peroneal nerve traction injury, neurovascular injury, patella baja, infection, numbness, knee instability, delayed healing, lower extremity deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, hinge fracture, recurrence deformity and so on [6, 46]. Park et al. hold that tibial tuberosity fracture is related to mistake of surgical procedure and easily preventable with caution [28]. Tibial tubercle fracture did not affect the clinical outcome and bony union in spite of the relatively high occurrence rate. Anatomical risk factors for the fractures are a lower tibial tubercle position [47]. A biomechanical study demonstrated that distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy (DTAO) increased the flange contact area and decreased the wedge volume in the opening gap compared to DTO, which would be an advantage for bone union at the osteotomy site [48].

Limitations of the study

Some limitations of this study should be noted. First, the small sample size might have affected the significant difference between the two surgical procedures. Second, it was based merely on clinical findings and measurements at 1.5–48 mouths postoperative which may underestimate the reported number of complications. Thus, a longer follow-up study with final functional outcomes evaluation will be more meaningful. Third, the included studies were observational studies and not RCTs, and they largely relied on retrospectively collected data, resulting in a high risk of selection bias. More large-sample, multi-center, high-quality, randomized controlled trials are needed to verify the outcomes of this meta-analysis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that during MOWHTO, both PTO and DTO increase posterior tibial slope after operation; The former is more likely to cause postoperative patella infera than the latter, but its safety is higher than the latter. Clinically, for patients with serious patellofemoral osteoarthritis, DTO can prevent the complication of patella baja and be preferred. In view of the heterogeneity and small sample size, whether these conclusions are applicable should be further determined in future studies.

Availability of data and materials

The present study was a review of previous published literatures.

Abbreviations

KOA:

Knee osteoarthritis

MOWHTO:

Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

PTO:

Proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy

DTO:

Distal tibial tubercle osteotomy

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

CDI:

Caton-Deschamps index

ISI:

Insal-Salvati index

BPI:

Blackburne-Peel index

MD:

Mean difference

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

ACL:

Anterior cruciate ligament

HSS:

Hospital for special surgery knee score

DTAO:

Distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy

References

  1. Messier SP, Mihalko SL, Beavers DP, et al. Effect of high-intensity strength training on knee pain and knee joint compressive forces among adults with knee osteoarthritis: the start randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(7):646. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.0411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the third national health and nutrition examination survey 1991–94. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(11):2271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ishizuka S, Hiraiwa H, Yamashita S, et al. Long-term survivorship of closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy for severe knee osteoarthritis: outcomes after 10 to 37 years. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:23259671211046964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peng H, Aichun O, Huang X, et al. Osteotomy around the knee: the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(5):1465–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashraf M, Purudappa PP, Sakthivelnathan V, et al. Proximal fibular osteotomy: systematic review on its outcomes. World J Orthop. 2020;11(11):499–506. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.499.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. He M, Zhong X, Li Z, et al. Progress in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01601-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD. Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11(3):132–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, et al. TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia–early results in 92 cases. Injury. 2003;34:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Esenkaya I, Unay K. Proximal medial tibial biplanar retrotubercle open wedge osteotomy in medial knee arthrosis. Knee. 2012;19(4):416–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Shigemoto K, et al. Patellofemoral osteoarthritis progression and alignment changes after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy do not affect clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DK, Kim DK, Song SJ, et al. Medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy may adversely affect the patellofemoral joint. Arthros J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2017;9:36–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2017.05.061.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Agneskirchner JD, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, et al. Effect of high tibial flexion osteotomy on cartilage pressure and joint kinematics: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(9):575–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bin SI, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, et al. Changes in patellar height after opening wedge and closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis. Arthros J Arthros Relat Surg. 2016;32:2393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Otsuki S, Murakami T, Okamoto Y, et al. Risk of patella baja after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(3):230949901880248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499018802484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keyhani S, Abbasian MR, Kazemi SM, et al. Modified retro-tubercle opening-wedge versus conventional high tibial osteotomy. Orthopedics. 2011;34(2):90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shim JS, Lee SH, Jung HJ, et al. High tibial open wedge osteotomy below the tibial tubercle: clinical and radiographic results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(1):57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Erquicia J, Gelber PE, Perelli S, et al. Biplane opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with a distal tuberosity osteotomy, radiological and clinical analysis with minimum follow-up of 2 years. J Exp Orthop. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0176-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ghinelli D, Baldassarri M, Parma A, et al. Five years of clinical and radiological results with biplanar tibial open-wedge osteotomy: feasible option to prevent patella infera? Euro J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31(1):95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dong JC, Shetty GM, Dong BL, et al. Tibial slope and patellar height after opening wedge high tibia osteotomy using autologous tricortical iliac bone graft. Knee. 2008;15(2):128–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nerhus TK, Ekeland A, Solberg G, et al. Radiological outcomes in a randomized trial comparing opening wedge and closing wedge techniques of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(3):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2011;343: d5928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in metaanalyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. [Accessed 9 Mar 2015].

  23. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JS, Lee JI, Han GC, et al. Retro-tubercle biplanar opening wedge high tibial osteotomy is favorable for the patellofemoral joint but not for the osteotomized tubercle itself compared with supra-tubercle osteotomy. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2021;37(8):2567–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Horikawa T, Kubota K, et al. Distal tuberosity osteotomy in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy does not exacerbate patellofemoral osteoarthritis on arthroscopic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;28(6):1750–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05596-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Yoshioka H, et al. Distal tibial tubercle osteotomy is superior to the proximal one for progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;28(10):3270–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05836-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Krause M, Drenck TC, Korthaus A, et al. Patella height is not altered by descending medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) compared to ascending HTO. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;26:1859–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoon P, Woo KH, Hwa KJ, et al. Open wedge high tibial osteotomy with distal tubercle osteotomy lessens change in patellar position. BioMed Res Int. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4636809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gooi SG, Chan CXY, Tan MKL, et al. Patella height changes post high tibial osteotomy. Indian J Orthop. 2017;51(5):545–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Morsi E, Habib ME, Hadhoud M. Comparison between results of high tibial osteotomy above and below tibial tubercle in relation to future total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2087–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Longino PD, Birmingham TB, Schultz WJ, et al. Combined tibial tubercle osteotomy with medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy minimizes changes in patellar height: a prospective cohort study with historical controls. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(12):2849–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elmal N, Esenkaya I, Can M. Monoplanar versus biplanar medial open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(12):2689–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hinterwimmer S, Beitzel K, Paul J, et al. Control of posterior tibial slope and patellar height in open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(4):851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gaasbeek R, Sonneveld H, Heerwaarden R, et al. Distal tuberosity osteotomy in open wedge high tibial osteotomy can prevent patella infera: a new technique. Knee. 2005;11(6):457–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, et al. Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy a radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38(2):323–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stoffel K, Willers C, Korshid O, et al. Patellofemoral contact pressure following high tibial osteotomy: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(9):1094–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim GB, Kim KI, Song SJ, et al. Increased posterior tibial slope after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy may result in degenerative changes in anterior cruciate ligament. J Arthroplast. 2019;34(9):1922–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Akiyama H. Effect of increased posterior tibial slope on the anterior cruciate ligament status in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy in an uninjured ACL population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(6):1085–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Akiyama H. Coronal tibiofemoral subluxation is correlated to correction angle in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(11):3482–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4948-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim EK, Won S, Jaffar M, et al. How does geometric change after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy affect anterior cruciate ligament status? Knee. 2020;27(3):940–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nha KW, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Lee DH. Change in posterior tibial slope after open-wedge and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(11):3006–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515626172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Türkmen F, Kaçıra BK, Özkaya M, Erkoçak ÖF, Acar MA, Özer M, Toker S, Demir T. Comparison of monoplanar versus biplanar medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy techniques for preventing lateral cortex fracture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(9):2914–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4049-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yong SL, Sang BL, Oh WS, et al. Changes in patellofemoral alignment do not cause clinical impact after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:129–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jo HS, Park JS, Byun JH, Lee YB, Choi YL, Cho SH, Moon DK, Lee SH, Hwang SC. The effects of different hinge positions on posterior tibial slope in medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;26(6):1851–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4526-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee SS, Nha KW, Lee DH. Posterior cortical breakage leads to posterior tibial slope change in lateral hinge fracture following opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Trauma Arthrosc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4977-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kucirek NK, Anigwe C, Zhang AL, et al. Complications after high tibial osteotomy and distal femoral osteotomy are associated with increasing medical comorbidities and tobacco use. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA, 2002.

  47. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Yoshioka H, et al. Fracture of the tibial tubercle does not affect clinical outcomes in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with distal tibial tubercle osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;10:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nejima S, Kumagai K, Fujimaki H, et al. Increased contact area of flange and decreased wedge volume of osteotomy site by open wedge distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy compared to the conventional technique[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;29(10):3450–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research is supported by Foundation of Tianjin Union Medical Center (2019YJ005).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yi-Ming Ren, Meng-Qiang Tian and Yuan-Hui Duan contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Joint and Sport Medicine, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Nankai University Affiliated People’s Hospital, Jieyuan Road 190, Hongqiao District, Tianjin, 300121, People’s Republic of China

    Yi-Ming Ren, Meng-Qiang Tian, Yuan-Hui Duan, Yun-Bo Sun, Tao Yang & Wei-Yu Hou

Authors
  1. Yi-Ming Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meng-Qiang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuan-Hui Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yun-Bo Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wei-Yu Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YMR, MQT, and YHD conceived the design of the study. YMR, YBS and YHD performed and collected the data and contributed to the design of the study. YMR, TY and WYH analyzed the data. YMR and MQT prepared and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final content of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng-Qiang Tian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. This paper does not involve research on humans.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, YM., Tian, MQ., Duan, YH. et al. Distal tibial tubercle osteotomy can lessen change in patellar height post medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 17, 341 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03231-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03231-0

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X