Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient’s demographic

From: Long-term outcomes of one single-design varus valgus constrained versus one single-design rotating hinge in revision knee arthroplasty after over 10-year follow-up

 

General

CCK group

RHK group

p value

Age (yr)

75.1 ± 7.3

73.1 ± 6.4

77.4 ± 7.7

p = 0.6

Gender (Male/female)

45/74

23/38

20/36

p = 0.82

Body mass index (kg/m2)

29.4 ± 7.2

28.9 ± 4.3

30.3 ± 6.1

p = 0.54

ROM

85.9º ± 19.3

86.7º ± 17.2

84.2º ± 24.9

p = 0.001

HKA

8.4º ± 7.7

7.9 ± 5.5

8.9 ± 9.5

p = 0.001

Previous revision implant (%)

16.2%

8.1%

25%

p = 0.037

Time until revision (month)

64.8 ± 38.5

67.1 ± 43.6

61.3 ± 36.9

p = 0.021

Charlson index

2 (0–9)

2 (0–8)

2 (0–9)

p = 0.75

ASA class (%)

   

p = 0.81

I

0

0

0

 

II

48

41

36

 

III

62

59

64

 

IV

0

0

0

 

Bone defect

   

p = 0.047

AORI I

8

5

3

 

AORI II

75

45

30

 

AORI III

34

11

23

 

KSCS

38 ± 17.1

39.4 ± 16.6

36 ± 15.1

p = 0.035

KSFS

31.8 ± 12.1

32.1 ± 11.5

30.3 ± 13.2

p = 0.057

KOOS

40.9 ± 13.1

43.2 ± 15.1

37.4 ± 9.3

p = 0.031

Reason for revision

   

p = 0.11

Aseptic loosening

53%

60.6%

39.3%

 

Infection

30.7%

22.9%

39.3%

 

Instability

16.3%

11,5%

21.4%

 
  1. ROM, range of motion; HKA, hip-knee angle; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists score; KSCS, Knee society clinical score; KSFS, Knee society functional score; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score