Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Comparative study between admission, orthopaedic surgery, and economic trends during Covid-19 and non-Covid-19 pandemic in an Italian tertiary hospital: a retrospective review

Abstract

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the most massive health emergencies in the last century and has caused millions of deaths worldwide and a massive economic and social burden. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the COVID-19 pandemic—during the Italian lockdown period between 8 March and 4 May 2020—influenced orthopaedic access for traumatic events to the Emergency Department (ER).

Methods

A retrospective review of the admission to the emergency room and the discharge of the trauma patients’ records was performed during the period between 8 March and 4 May 2020 (block in Italy), compared to the same period of the previous year (2019). Patients accesses, admissions, days of hospitalisation, frequency, fracture site, number and type of surgery, the time between admission and surgery, days of hospitalisation, and treatment cost according to the diagnosis-related group were collected. Chi-Square and ANOVA test were used to compare the groups.

Results

No significant statistical difference was found for the number of emergency room visits and orthopaedic hospitalisations (p < 0.53) between the year 2019 (9.5%) and 2020 (10.81%). The total number of surgeries in 2019 was 119, while in 2020, this was just 48 (p < 0.48). A significant decrease in the mean cost of orthopaedic hospitalisations was detected in 2020 compared (261.431 euros, equal to − 52.07%) relative to the same period in 2019 (p = 0.005). Although all the surgical performances have suffered a major decline, the most frequent surgery in 2020 was intramedullary femoral nailing.

Conclusion

We detected a decrease in traumatic occasions during the lockdown period, with a decrease in fractures in each district and a consequent decrease in the diagnosis-related group (DRG).

Introduction

In December 2019, in the city of Wuhan, China, the first cases of acute respiratory syndrome from COVID-19 were identified, and the virus responsible for COVID-19 was later identified as SARS-COV-2 in February 2020. Due to the virus’s high contagion capacity, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared this a pandemic in March 2020 [1]. Clinical presentation of COVID-19 ranges from absence of symptoms to severe pneumonia [2] and could be associated to musculoskeletal symptoms, including myalgia, arthralgia, and fatigue, are a nearly constant presence [3]. COVID-19 has caused millions of deaths worldwide and was considered a massive economic and social burden. Social distancing was the first of the countermeasures employed by most countries. During the Italian national lockdown, there have been enormous restrictions on all daily living, work, and sports activities [4]. Similarly, considerable efforts have been made to contain the spread of the virus, and several safety measures have been adopted by hospitals and health workers to ensure the safety of the community [4]. The redistribution of hospital staff and resources in favour of those departments dedicated only to dealing with the health emergency led to the reduction or the complete cessation of elective medicine [5]. Furthermore, as a result of the measures adopted, the number, type, and methods of access to first aid centres and hospital emergency rooms have changed compared to previous years [6].

Although many hospital departments have suffered a significant contraction in their activity and even closure, our Orthopaedics and Trauma Department continued to work, reducing elective activity and leaving ample space for traumatology [4]. In order to avoid delay in trauma diagnosis and treatment, as well as, crowd the Emergency Departments (ED) [7], the several admission procedures has been proposed and published [8,9,10]. Despite the reduction of clinical activity was previously documented, no specific economic report are present in the literature. The purposes of this study were to (1) describe whether and how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the need for orthopaedic intervention, the type of traumatic injury, and the characteristics of those patients who had first access for trauma to the ED during the lockdown period between 8 March and 4 May 2020; and (2) to compare the obtained results with those of the same period of 2019. We hypothesise that ER trauma admission was reduced in 2020 relative to the previous year.

Materials and methods

Design of the study

Between 8 March and 4 May 2020 (lockdown in Italy), a retrospective review of ER admission and discharges of trauma patients’ records was performed. A comparison was made to the same period of the previous year (2019). The study was conducted according to STROBE guidelines.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients of any age affected by fractures that require orthopaedic surgery and hospitalisation at our operating unit, between 8 March and 4 May 2020, and the same period of the previous year were included. Cases of infection, pathological fractures, non-surgical patients, and elective interventions not compatible with access to the emergency room were excluded.

Data collection

The 2019 and 2020 data of patients admitted to the Orthopedics Department of the Policlinico University Hospital, San Marco, was extracted from the ER database admission. For each patient who underwent surgery from 8 March to 5 May, gender, date of birth, date of exams, type of exams, diagnosis, report, type of surgery, date of surgery, and date of discharge were recorded.

We collected accesses, admissions, days of hospitalisation, frequency, fracture site, side, number and type of surgery, the time between admission and surgery, days of hospitalisation, and treatment cost, according to the diagnosis-related group (DRG). DRGs were created to assess resource utilisation and quality of care for hospital admissions (Table 1) [11].

Table 1 DRG codes, the cost of one day of hospitalisation, and the cost of each day of hospitalisation

According to the patients’ age, the sample was divided into five groups (0–18, 18–40, 40–60, 60–80, over 80).

Finally, the cost information for the performance was collected from the databases of the company’s health management, and the corresponding DRG is associated with each service (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cost of performance

Statistical analysis

Continuous data are presented as means and standard deviations, as appropriate. The chi-square test was used to verify the homogeneity of the two groups based on age, sex, and side of the lesion, while the analysis of variance (ANOVA test) was used to analyse two or more groups of data, comparing the variability within these groups with the variability between groups. The threshold selected for statistical significance was p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad 2016 software (GraphPad Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Results

In 2019 there were 1131 admissions to the emergency room for trauma, with 119 hospitalisations in orthopaedics (9.5%). In 2020, there were 519 admissions to the emergency room for trauma and osteoporosis, with 48 hospitalisations in orthopaedics (10.81%). No significant statistical difference was found for the number of emergency room visits and orthopaedics admissions (p = 0.53) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The number of emergency room visits and orthopedics admissions (ER emergency room)

The total number of surgeries in 2019 was 119, with only 48 in 2020 (p = 0.48). In 2020, admissions to the orthopaedics unit were 60.5% of the level recorded in 2019. All the surgical performances suffered a major decline in 2020, and the most frequent surgery was proximal femur intramedullary nailing in 2020. The data reveal a drastic reduction in proximal femur intramedullary nailing (− 91%), ankle fixation with plate (− 97.8%), and fixation of humerus with plate (− 77.6%) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Difference in types of surgery in 2019 and 2020

High-energy trauma was reduced due to a reduction in high-energy traumatic occasions, but the number of home accidents involving the elderly was maintained.

In the selected period of 2019, the Orthopedic Clinic produced a DRG of 545,479 euros (a mean of 28,709.42 ± 33,102.22 euros for each surgery); in 2020 it was recorded a decrease of − 261,431 euros (545,479 in 2019 vs. 284,048 in 2020; − 52.1%). A statistical significance was found in the comparison of the means (p = 0.005) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

DRG for surgery

According to DRG by age group (Fig. 5), the Orthopedic Clinic recorded a substantial decrease in income (p = 0.0000), equivalent to a reduction of 20.289 euros for patients aged between 0 and 18 years (p = 1.0000), 58.161 euros for those between 19 and 40 (p = 1.0000), 23.178 euros for patients between 41 and 60 years (p = 1.0000), 90.594 euros between 61 and 80 years (p = 1.0000) and 102.411 euros for patients over 80 years (p = 0.0000).

Fig. 5
figure 5

DRG for age groups

The patients were divided by age group, and the days of hospitalisation were calculated for each group (Fig. 6). We detected a significant difference when comparing 2019 and 2020 (p = 0.05). In 2019, those patients up to 18 years and those over 80 had a longer hospital stay, and instead, in 2020, the 60–80-year-olds group had the most days of hospitalisation. The overall time of average hospitalisation and age were comparable between years (p > 0.05).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Days of hospitalisation for age group

A comparison was also made of the frequency of fractures by body districts (Fig. 7). There was a decrease in fractures in each district, and fractures of the femur, wrist (− 4.61%), hand (− 37.35%), shoulder (− 10%), and ankle (− 23.8%) were the most frequent injuries. 2020 saw a statistically significant reduction in the number of treated fractures of the femur (p = 0.0002), wrist (p = 0.006), elbow (p = 0.03), shoulder (p = 0.03), and leg (p = 0.09).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Fracture frequency by district in 2019 and 2020

Discussion

Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly influenced accesses to our Emergency Department, and a significant decrease of accesses (− 51.8%) has been recorded, with the number of hospitalisations in our unit decreasing by 60.5%.

Despite these decreases in the number of accesses to the emergency room and to our unit, no significant difference was found for the number of emergency room visits and orthopaedics admissions when comparing 2019 (9.5%) and 2020 (10.8%). Taking into consideration the DRG, there was a decrease for the chosen period of 261,431 euros, equal to − 52.07% between 2019 and 2020 (Fig. 5).

This trend could be justified considering the numerous indications provided by the government and the mass media, suggesting that people access the emergency room only for serious reasons that cannot be delayed in order to avoid contagion and the collapse of health facilities [9].

After the spread of coronavirus, governments of the world imposed restrictions on population activity to limit the spread of COVID-19 [12]. The first Italian infectious outbreak was registered in February 2020 in Codogno, Lombardy [13]. Italy was the first country to report a case of coronavirus in Europe, and it was the country with the highest number of deaths in the world for several months during the beginning of the pandemic. On 30 January, the Italian government declared a state of emergency. Then, on 22 February, the Italian National Institute of Health identified certain municipalities in Lombardy and Veneto as so-called red zones, which were quarantined for 14 days [14].

However, due to the rapid spread of the virus, the government proceeded to close all schools, most commercial activities, and many factories, also forbidding all sports activities in northern Italy on 7 March. These measures were then extended to the whole country on 11 March 2020 [15]. Within just a few weeks, many changes were made to cope with the increasing need for medical care and intensive care units.

To deal with the epidemic, the orthopaedics and traumatology units and many hospital units in the national territory had to help as much as possible. In the initial phase of the outbreak, orthopaedic and trauma teams were allowed to continue performing surgeries for trauma and cancer patients. As a result of these preventive measures, at Humanitas Hospital in Rozzano (Mi), the number of hip and knee arthroplasties fell sharply from 706 in 2019 to 166 (76.5% less) in 2020. Regarding the indications for arthroplasty, 95.6% of the surgeries performed in 2019 were rated as non-urgent, and the percentage was similar in 2020 (95.8%). A total of seven arthroplasties classified as urgent were performed in 2020. The number of patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit after arthroplasty was 323 in 2019 (46% of all TJAs) and 45 in 2020 (27%) [16]. In a similar way, rehabilitation units for orthopaedic patients also had to conform to the needs related to the pandemic emergency. The Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine (SIMFER) considered it necessary to maintain the appropriate levels of activity in this field under such difficult circumstances, not only to provide adequate care for people in need of rehabilitation. Therefore, a summary document has been filled with recommendations to provide adequate care in addition to protecting patients and professionals and remembering that the first priority is to limit the spread of infection [17]. Similar prescriptions have also been implemented in other countries [18,19,20,21]. In Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute ER in Milan, the analysis of this aspect during the first month of the pandemic (12 March to 12 April 2020) compared to the same period in 2019 demonstrated marked differences in length of emergency department stay, request for chest radiographs, discharge diagnosis, triage color-code at admission and discharge (white code: non-urgent patients; green code: urgent but non-critical patients; yellow code: fairly critical patients; red code: patients at danger of death), and emergency department arrival and discharge modalities [22]. Comparable data were reported by the survey carried out by the CIO (Italian Osteosynthesis Club), which collected data from different centres on the Italian territory and verified the frequency of trauma access to the emergency department in the first 6 weeks of lockdown. Data from the hospital register showed that the number of accesses to the emergency room in the first week increased by 17%, and from the following week, the activity started to decrease by 28% in the second week, to 60%, 57%, 66%, and 71% in the following weeks [23]. Sports injuries increased by 70% in the first week, then there was a progressive decrease by 51%, 84%, 96%, 98%, until 100%, as outdoor team or individual sports activities were eventually prohibited. Considering injuries at work, there was a 60% increase in the number of traumas in the first week and a progressive weekly reduction of 30%, 73%, 55%, 63%, and 72% thereafter. Domestic injuries increased by 15% in the first week and then decreased by 25%, 41%, 40%, 56%, and 41% in the last week considered [23]. Although there was a significant reduction compared to the previous year, the only traumatic events that remained constant during this period were femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Also, closer analysis showed that the number of hospitalisations differed by age group, with working-age patients being more affected than the elderly, even though femur fractures appeared to be the main cause of hospitalisation [23]. A decrease in femoral neck fractures in the elderly (2020 vs. 2019) was recorded in Italy, although less than the decrease in fractures due to high-energy trauma, as they occur due to falls at home. The same trend was confirmed by the present study; in fact, all surgical performances suffered a sharp decline in 2020, but the most frequent intervention was the proximal femur intramedullary nailing. High-energy trauma was reduced due to the reduction of high-energy traumatic occasions, but home accidents involving older individuals were not reduced. The Emergency Department of the AOU, Policlinico G. Rodolico, San Marco of Catania, registers the largest number of trauma patients in the area every day. Beyond the AOU, the institution also welcomed patients destined for other Emergency Departments that, at the time, were instead dedicated to patients with suspected COVID-19. According to our estimates, between 8 March and 4 May 2019 and the same period in 2020, there was a 51.8% decrease in trauma admissions and a − 60.5% decrease in hospitalisations for traumatic events. Despite the admission reduction, no statistical differences were founded compare to the previous year (p = 0.53), it could be warranted of proper admission criteria during the two periods. These data could be modified if we considered the elective interventions that were not carried out in 2020.

Catania is one of the largest and most populous in Sicily, with a population of approximately 300,000 inhabitants, and considering the adjacent cities, it serves a catchment area of more than one million citizens [19]. There are three different public hospitals in which there are emergency room accesses and orthopaedics and traumatology units that perform thousands of care services and major and minor orthopaedic surgery operations every year.

In Ireland, considering a study carried out on three trauma centres in Dublin, with care volumes similar to those of Catania (159 high volume bed), the average was 65 cases overnight and 100 cases per day per week and more than 1500 primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasties per year [24]. The authors report a similar mean age of admission as in this study (55 years; range 17–92 years). Also, there was a statistically significant decrease in the number of patients who had surgery per day (− 39.8%, p value < 0.001) between the reference and containment periods and between the pre-containment and containment periods [19]. With regard to hand surgery, there was a significant decrease only between the reference and containment periods (− 23.6%, p = 0.029). Also, the authors reported a 28.7% decrease in the activity of traumatic surgery after social activity restriction. Looking at general traumatic surgery, there was a 37.8% decrease in activity after the statement of restraint measures [19]. The change in traumatic activity depends on the occupation of the population. The authors reported a 28.7% decrease in the activity of traumatic surgery after social activity restriction. Looking at general traumatic surgery, there was a 37.8% decrease in activity after the statement of restraint measures. The change in traumatic activity depends on the occupation of the population. The most significant decrease in general orthopaedic trauma compared to hand trauma, which might be explained by the decrease in traumatology of the elderly and/or the decrease of road traffic accidents [19]. With regard to the anatomical districts, in our study, it was found that during the lockdown period, the main areas of injury were: the femur (23%), distal radius (15%), shoulder (13%), and ankle (12%). In the Irish study, 32% of the fractures were in the ankle and foot, 28% in the hand and ankle, and 16% in the hip and femur [19]. The most salient data in our study show a drastic reduction in proximal femur intramedullary nailing (− 91%), ankle fixation with a plate (− 97.8%), and fixation of the humerus with a plate (− 77.6%). However, the femoral fractures represent the most frequent fracture site during the lockdown period in 2020 (Fig. 4).

Regarding the DRG of our institutions of the AOU, Policlinico G. Rodolico, San Marco, we detected a decrease of 52.1% in 2020 relative to 2019, equivalent to 261,431 euros (Fig. 5).

Hashmi et al. [25] estimated that the financial income of one of Pakistan’s leading orthopaedic centres decreased by more than 55%. In the USA, some authors have noted immediate economic effects and fallout from the COVID-19 crisis, similar to those of the Great Recession of 2008 [26]. A survey found that orthopaedic surgeons lost almost 30% of their retirement savings during the 2008 economic recession, with surgery and patient volume decreasing by 30.4% and 29.3%, respectively [27]. After the Great Recession, from 2009 to 2011, the decrease in hospital admissions by patients with commercial insurance resulted in an average loss of $3.7 million for a 300-bed hospital. At the end of the COVID-19 crisis, unemployment is expected to be up to three times that of the Great Recession. While the healthcare systems considered are very different, the authors described an economic decline similar to that seen in our analysis. Unfortunately, to date, there is no scientific data or evidence to measure the actual economic consequence in Italy for orthopaedic and trauma units. To our knowledge, this is the first Italian scientific study to quantify the welfare and economic change of a department of orthopaedics and traumatology in a populous Italian city. No previous study was published about the economic variation trend in OU of orthopaedics and traumatology; moreover, the Italian results reported in the literature are limited to the northern region of the country. This article is useful to provide a more extensive picture of the health system reaction to an unusual pandemic. The present findings could be helpful in the creation of future clinical-care and economical strategies. Telemedicine is of great interest for the future in orthopaedics and is considered safe and effective by several authors [28]. Telemedicine could be used in the postoperative follow-up of selected cases, in the follow-up of fractures, and also in paediatric cases [28]. Remote fracture diagnosis is successfully performed on an outpatient basis in many countries. Protocols and methods have been developed to standardise the virtual orthopaedic examination for common musculoskeletal conditions. Satisfaction with teleconsultations and cost-effectiveness of remote care orthopaedics has been good [29, 30]. It is believed that remote care will be extended in several hospitals around the world because of its enormous potential. This fact is explained by the natural development of technology and the change and obliteration of habits that have accelerated exponentially since the COVID-19 crisis.

This study is preliminary, and further investigations are needed to confirm our data through multicentre studies conducted in large organisations like ours. It certainly shows the immediate changes that the pandemic caused on the health system, decreasing performance and the consequent DRGs with important professional and economic losses.

Limits of the study are the retrospective study design, limited follow-up, the lack of patients clinical assessment and more extending economical analysis.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly influenced our National Health System, forcing us to reorganise paths and activities. In Catania City, the fear of being infected by COVID-19 has undoubtedly played a leading role in reducing access to the emergency room and admissions to the orthopaedics department of the Policlinico-San Marco. Our data confirm the decrease in traumatic occasions outdoors, while those occurring within the home environment remained unchanged. We also noticed a consequent reduction in DRGs and a decrease in fractures in each district. Further multicentric and multidisciplinary studies will be needed to confirm the findings from this study.

Availability of data and materials

All analysed data are included in this published article.

References

  1. Nuñez JH, Sallent A, Lakhani K, Guerra-Farfan E, Vidal N, Ekhtiari S, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on an emergency traumatology service: experience at a tertiary trauma centre in Spain. Injury. 2020;51(Suppl 7):1414–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.05.016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Migliorini F, Torsiello E, Spiezia F, Oliva F, Tingart M, Maffulli N. Association between HLA genotypes and COVID-19 susceptibility, severity and progression: a comprehensive review of the literature. Eur J Med Res. 2021;26(Suppl 1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00563-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cipollaro L, Giordano L, Padulo J, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Musculoskeletal symptoms in SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01702-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Memeo A, Priano D, Caldarini C, Trezza P, Laquidara M, Montanari L, et al. How the pandemic spread of COVID-19 affected children’s traumatology in Italy: changes of numbers anatomical locations and severity. Minerva Pediatr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4946.20.05910-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Maniscalco P, Poggiali E, Quattrini F, Ciatti C, Magnacavallo A, Caprioli S, et al. The deep impact of novel CoVID-19 infection in an orthopedics and traumatology department: the experience of the Piacenza Hospital. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(Suppl 2):97–105. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i2.9635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazzerini M, Barbi E, Apicella A, Marchetti F, Cardinale F, Trobia G. Delayed access or provision of care in Italy resulting from fear of COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(5):e10–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30108-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jarvis S, Salottolo K, Madayag R, et al. Delayed hospital admission for traumatic hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:237. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02382-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruggieri P, Trovarelli G, Angelini A, Pala E, Berizzi A, Donato D. COVID-19 strategy in organizing and planning orthopedic surgery in a major orthopedic referral center in an area of Italy severely affected by the pandemic: experience of the Department of Orthopedics, University of Padova. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01740-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Morelli I, Luceri F, Giorgino R, Accetta R, Perazzo P, Mangiavini L, et al. COVID-19: not a contraindication for surgery in patients with proximal femur fragility fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01800-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wignall A, Giannoudis V, De C, Jimenez A, Sturdee S, Nisar S, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on the management and outcomes of patients with proximal femoral fractures: a multi-centre study of 580 patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02301-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Aiello FA, Roddy SP. Inpatient coding and the diagnosis-related group. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66(5):1621–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaughan A. Italy in lockdown. New Sci. 2020;245(Suppl 3273):7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(20)30520-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Grasselli G, Pesenti A, Cecconi M. Critical care utilization for the COVID-19 outbreak in Lombardy, Italy: early experience and forecast during an emergency response. JAMA. 2020;323(Suppl 16):1545–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Callaway E. Time to use the p-word? Coronavirus enters dangerous new phase. Nature. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00551-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Placella G, Salvato D, Delmastro E, Bettinelli G, Salini V. CoViD-19 and ortho and trauma surgery: the Italian experience. Injury. 2020;51(Suppl 6):1403–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Apolito R, Faraldi M, Ottaiano I, Zagra L. Disruption of arthroplasty practice in an orthopedic center in Northern Italy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(Suppl 7):S6-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.057.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Boldrini P, Bernetti A, Fiore P, SIMFER Executive Committee, SIMFER Committee for International Affairs. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on rehabilitation services and Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine physicians’ activities in Italy. An official document of the Italian PRM Society (SIMFER). Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56(Suppl 3):316–8. https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06256-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sawhney C, Singh Y, Jain K, Sawhney R, Trikha A. Trauma care and COVID-19 pandemic. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020;36(Suppl 1):S115–20. https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_272_20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Staunton P, Gibbons JP, Keogh P, Curtin P, Cashman JP, O’Byrne JM. Regional trauma patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgeon. 2021;19(Suppl 2):e49-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Simon MJK, Regan WD. COVID-19 pandemic effects on orthopaedic surgeons in British Columbia. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02283-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bagherifard A, Arasteh P, Salehpour M, Zadeh HS, Mazhar FN, Ghandhari H, et al. COVID-19 among patients with orthopedic surgery: our experience from the Middle East. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02483-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Luceri F, Morelli I, Accetta R, Mangiavini L, Maffulli N, Peretti GM. Italy and COVID-19: the changing patient flow in an orthopedic trauma center emergency department. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15:323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01816-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Benazzo F, Rossi SMP, Maniscalco P, Moretti B, Vaienti E, Ruggieri P, et al. The orthopaedic and traumatology scenario during Covid-19 outbreak in Italy: chronicles of a silent war. Int Orthop. 2020;44(Suppl 8):1453–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04637-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. La Greca P, Barbarossa L, Ignaccolo M, Inturri G, Martinico F. The density dilemma. A proposal for introducing smart growth principles in a sprawling settlement within Catania Metropolitan Area. Cities. 2011;28(Suppl 6):527–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.06.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hashmi P, Fahad S, Naqi Khan H, Zahid M, Sadruddin A, Noordin S. Covid-19 pandemic: economic burden on patients with musculoskeletal injuries in a tertiary care hospital of LMIC; retrospective cross sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020;60:5–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. O’Connor CM, Anoushiravani AA, DiCaprio MR, Healy WL, Iorio R. Economic recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic: resuming elective orthopedic surgery and total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(Suppl 7):S32–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.038.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Iorio R, Davis CM 3rd, Healy WL, Fehring TK, O’Connor MI, York S. Impact of the economic downturn on adult reconstruction surgery: a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25(Suppl 7):1005–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.08.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Makhni MC, Riew GJ, Sumathipala MG. Telemedicine in orthopaedic surgery: challenges and opportunities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(Suppl 13):1109–15. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.00452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Giordano L, Cipollaro L, Migliorini F, Maffulli N. Impact of Covid-19 on undergraduate and residency training. Surgeon. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.09.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jannelli E, Castelli A, Ferranti Calderoni E, Annunziata S, Maccario G, Ivone A, et al. Fractures in patients with COVID-19 infection: early prognosis and management. A case series of 20 patients in a single institution in Lombardy, Northern Italy. J Orthop Trauma. 2020;34(Suppl 10):e389–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GT, VP, AV and MS aided in conception, design, interpretation, provided input and revisions to the manuscript, approved of, and agreed to be accountable for the integrity of the work. AC, FV and FR aided in conception, design, analysis, interpretation, provided writing and revisions to the manuscript, approved of, and agreed to be accountable for the integrity of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Testa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Testa, G., Sapienza, M., Rabuazzo, F. et al. Comparative study between admission, orthopaedic surgery, and economic trends during Covid-19 and non-Covid-19 pandemic in an Italian tertiary hospital: a retrospective review. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 601 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02754-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02754-2

Keywords