Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Effects of hypoxia on Achilles tendon repair using adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded small intestinal submucosa

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 16, Article number: 570 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffolds seeded with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) for engineered tendon repairing rat Achilles tendon defects and to compare the effects of preconditioning treatments (hypoxic vs. normoxic) on the tendon healing.

Methods

Fifty SD rats were randomized into five groups. Group A received sham operation (blank control). In other groups, the Achilles tendon was resected and filled with the original tendon (Group B, autograft), cell-free SIS (Group C), or SIS seeded with ADMSCs preconditioned under normoxic conditions (Group D) or hypoxic conditions (Group E). Samples were collected 4 weeks after operation and analyzed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and tensile testing.

Results

Histologically, compared with Groups C and D, Group E showed a significant improvement in extracellular matrix production and a higher compactness of collagen fibers. Group E also exhibited a significantly higher peak tensile load than Groups D and C. Additionally, Group D had a significantly higher peak load than Group C. Immunohistochemically, Group E exhibited a significantly higher percentage of MKX + cells than Group D. The proportion of ADMSCs simultaneously positive for both MKX and CM-Dil observed from Group E was also greater than that in Group D.

Conclusions

In this animal model, the engineered tendon grafts created by seeding ADMSCs on SIS were superior to cell-free SIS. The hypoxic precondition further improved the expression of tendon-related genes in the seeded cells and increased the rupture load after grafting in the Achilles tendon defects.

Introduction

Achilles tendon rupture is a common injury of the musculoskeletal system. In the UK, it is estimated to affect 0.113% of the population annually [1]. Current treatments include drug administration, physiotherapy, and autografting, but the outcome is frequently unsatisfactory as the tendon is poorly vascularized and cellularized. Autografting is relatively effective in restoring the function of damaged tendons, but its use is limited by the availability of autografts and donor-site damage [2, 3]. Tissue engineering is emerging as a new option of managing tendon injuries. In this technique, cells are seeded on a scaffold and cultured in vitro to induce their proliferation and differentiation to a desired phenotype, creating an analog of autograft for implantation [4]. The scaffold material, cells, and culture conditions are all critical for the success of this technique.

Many materials have been studied for tendon tissue engineering, such as polypropylene mesh, human amniotic membrane (HAM), and small intestinal submucosa (SIS). Polypropylene mesh is commercially available and has generally satisfactory mechanical properties, but it is non-degradable in vivo. HAM supports cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation; unfortunately, its biomechanical properties are unsatisfactory, especially in the early stage of healing [5]. SIS is an extracellular matrix (ECM) containing abundant collagen fibers, proteoglycans, and growth factors [6] that play important roles in tissue repair [7,8,9,10]. In vitro, SIS was reported to promote the adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation of stem cells [11]. In vivo, SIS-based scaffolds have been studied for repairing defects of tissues such as the vocal cords, dura mater, and tendons [7,8,9,10].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells able to self-renew while remaining undifferentiated [12]. Studies have demonstrated that, under appropriate conditions, MSCs can differentiate into different phenotypes such as osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and fibroblasts [13, 14]. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have been commonly used as seed cells for the engineering of various tissues such as the bone, myocardium, and tendon [15,16,17]. Nevertheless, BMSCs are associated with technical disadvantages such as invasive procedures of isolation and low BMSC concentration in the bone marrow [18]. Recently, MSCs derived from adipose tissue (ADMSCs) have gained increasing attention because of their less invasive harvesting, relatively abundance, and higher proliferative capacity [19]. Furthermore, ADMSCs are particularly suitable for tissue engineering when a large number of seed cells are required. In an injury model of horse flexor tendonitis, after injection of ADMSCs, the tissue structure of collagen fibers was improved and the properties of tendons were enhanced [20]. In a rabbit model, defects of Achilles tendons were repaired with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or a mixture of PRP and ADMSCs. At week 4, the tendons repaired with the PRP-ADMSCs mixture were significantly stronger than those receiving PRP alone [21]. These results suggest ADMSCs to be promising cells for the repair of soft tissues. Currently, however, no study has investigated the use of ADMSCs combined with SIS for the tissue engineering of tendons.

In addition to scaffolds and seed cells, the environment in which the cells proliferate and differentiate is also crucial for the success of tissue engineering. For example, hypoxic conditions have been found to promote the secretion of factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor, hypoxia-inducible factors) by MSCs and, thus, considered a potential strategy to improve the survival of transplanted MSCs [22]. Huang et al. [23] cultured BMSCs under hypoxic or normoxic conditions, and injected the cells into experimental defects created in rat Achilles tendons. Four weeks after injection, the defects repaired with BMSCs cultured under hypoxic conditions showed a significantly higher ultimate failure load than those repaired with the cells cultured under normoxic conditions. Other animal studies found that, hypoxic preconditioning of ADMSCs promoted wound healing, cartilage repair, and angiogenesis [24,25,26]. However, no study has investigated the effects of hypoxic conditioning on tendon tissue engineering with ADMSCs.

The present study investigated the repair of rat Achilles tendon defects with SIS scaffolds seeded with ADMSCs, and compared the effects of preconditioning treatments (hypoxic vs. normoxic) on the tendon healing. Our goal was to generate fundamental information for improving the outcomes of tendon tissue engineering.

Materials and methods

Animals

Sixty male Sprague–Dawley rats (8–10 weeks, 250–300 g) were purchased from Experimental Animal Center of Southwest Medical University. The study protocol was approved by Committee of Research Ethics of Southwest Medical University, and all procedures followed Experimental Animal Welfare Guidelines of the University.

Cell isolation

The animal was anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 2% (w/w) pentobarbital (30 mg/kg). Inguinal adipose tissue was surgically collected bilaterally under aseptic conditions. The tissue was washed three times with PBS, fragmented, and digested with 0.1% type-I collagenase (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) under continuous shaking (37 °C, 60 min). Digestion was terminated by adding equal volume of complete culture medium (CCM; a-MEM supplemented with 16.6% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, 0.1 g/mL streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine). The resultant mixture was filtered with a mesh (pore size: 75 µm; Sigma), and the filtrate was diluted with CCM and centrifuged (1500 r/min, 5 min). The supernatant was aspirated off, and the cells were resuspended in PBS and centrifuged again (1500 r/min, 5 min). After removing the supernatant again, the cells were resuspended in CCM, seeded in Petri dishes (1 × 105 cell/cm2), and incubated (37 °C, 5% CO2, 20% O2, relative humidity 95%) with a renewal of CCM every 3 days.

Flow cytometry

When the cells at passage 3 reached 80–90% confluency, the medium was replaced with 2 ml of 0.25% trypsin (Gibco). After digestion for 30 min, the cells were transferred to a 15-ml Eppendorf tube and treated by two cycles of: centrifugation (5 min, 1000 r/min), supernatant removal, and resuspension of the pellet in 5 ml of PBS. The antibodies to CD29-APC, CD90-PE-Cy7, CD34- PE, CD45-PerCP, CD31-PE and homotype control antibody were added into the suspension. After incubation (room temperature, 0.5 h), the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (BD FACSAria, BD, San Jose, CA, USA).

Cell preconditioning

Cells at passage 3 were seeded in Petri dishes (1 × 105 cell/cm2) and incubated under either normoxic (20% O2, 75% N2, 5% CO2) or hypoxic conditions (2% O2, 93% N2, and 5% CO2) for up to 7 days.

Fluorescence labeling

To track the differentiation of ADMSCs in vivo, the cells were labeled with Dilute Vybrant CM-DiI cell-labeling solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Subsequently, the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min, and then at 4 °C for 15 min.

Preparation of SIS scaffolds

Porcine SIS was prepared following a previous study [27, 28]. Briefly, porcine jejunum was obtained from a local market, cut into strips (length: ~ 10 cm), and rinsed carefully with saline. The tunica serosa and tunica muscularis were harvested by mechanical scraping, defatted by immersion in a solution of methanol/chloroform (v: v = 1:1) for 12 h, rinsed repeatedly with distilled water, and disinfected with 0.1% peracetic acid for 30 min. All samples were freeze-dried at − 55 °C for 48 h. The obtained SIS was kept in vacuum-sealed bags and sterilized by ethylene oxide fumigation.

Cell seeding

The SIS strips were cut into rectangular samples (~ 1 × 1.5 cm) and rehydrated by placing in 6-well plates containing PBS for 24 h. The labeled cells were added into the culture medium and seeded on the SIS samples (1.5 × 106 cells/scaffold) according to our previous experience [27, 28]. Then, they were cultured (37 °C, 5% CO2, 20%O2) for 48 h.

Animal grouping and operation

Fifty SD rats were randomized into five groups (n = 20/group) as shown in Fig. 1. The animal was anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg). A longitudinal incision was made on the posterior aspect of each hind leg above the ankle to expose the Achilles tendon. For Group A (sham operation), the wound was simply closed layer by layer. For the other four groups, a 5-mm segment was resected from the mid-tendinous region (Fig. 2A). For Group B (autograft), the defect was rinsed with 2 ml of penicillin (1: 10,000) and 3 ml of lincomycin (1: 1000). The removed segment was immersed in penicillin (1: 10,000) and lincomycin (1: 1000) solutions each for 15 min, and then sutured back to the original location by a modified Kessler method. For the other three groups, bilateral defects were created similarly; SIS scaffolds were rolled into cylinders (diameter: ~ 2–2.5 mm, length: 5 cm), placed into the defects (Fig. 2B), and sutured identically to Group B. The scaffolds used in Group C were cell-free (Fig. 1), and those in Group D and E were loaded with ADMSCs (1.5 × 106 cells/scaffold) preconditioned under normoxic or hypoxic conditions (Sect. 2.4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic showing grouping of animals

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Photographs showing the experimental procedures; A surgical exposure of the Achilles tendon to be resected; B tissue-engineered graft (in this case an ADMSCs-seeded SIS) sutured to the defect in replacement of the resected tendinous tissue

Full size image

Four weeks after operation, all rats were killed by intravenous injection of pentobarbital (100 mg/kg). All Achilles tendons were harvested for biomechanical and histological evaluations. Samples retrieved from Groups D and E were also investigated by immunohistochemical and immunofluorometric examinations.

Sample processing and examinations

For histology, harvested samples were immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated in ethanol series, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned sagittally (thickness: ~ 5 µm). The sections were stained with hematoxylin–eosin (HE) and Masson’s Trichrome reagents.

For immunohistochemical examination, paraffin-embedded sections from Groups D and E were de-paraffinized with xylene and rehydrated. They were immersed in 3% H2O2/methanol (v: v = 1:9) for 15 min to block endogenous peroxidase and rinsed thrice with PBS. Subsequently, the sections were probed with the primary monoclonal antibodies [rabbit antibody to Tenomodulin (Abcam) and rabbit antibody to Mohawk homeobox (Sigma)]. After three rinses with PBS, they were probed again with Dako REAL EnVision detection kits (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) following manufacturer instructions. Then, diaminobenzidine (Boster Bio, Pleasanton, CA, USA) was added for color development, and the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin.

For immunofluorescent examination, the samples were cryogenically sectioned (thickness: 10 µm). The sections were fixed in cold acetone, rinsed thrice with PBS, and probed sequentially with rabbit antibody to CD31 (Abcam) and rabbit antibody to Mohawk homeobox (Sigma) (each 37 °C for 2 h). After three rinses with PBS, they were probed with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled goat- anti-rabbit IgG (secondary antibody, 37 °C, 1 h). Finally, they were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Stained sections were observed under a fluorescence microscope, and five random fields were taken and counted for triple-immunostained cells.

For biomechanical test, the samples were harvested from the calcaneus to 1 cm above the proximal suture and rinsed carefully with saline. The collected sample was further dissected to remove irrelevant connective tissues. Thirty grafts (six specimens/group) were randomly selected and tested by tension to rupture (10 mm/min; Instron 5967, load cell: 100 N; Instron, Norwood, MA, USA). Both ends of the sample were secured in a screw grip. The peak failure load was recorded, and the site of sample rupture was observed.

Statistical analysis

Data from two groups were compared by t test (SPPSS 17.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Data from > 2 group were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey multiple comparison test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

ADMSCs culture and identification

After culture of the primary ADMSCs for 24 h (Fig. 3A), the cells adhered to culture dishes and grew in colonies; most cells appeared round. After culture for 7 days, most cells became spindle-like (Fig. 3B). After three passages, the cells maintained the spindle-like morphology. Flow cytometry found that, > 95% of the cells were CD90+ and CD29+, whereas < 5% were CD31−, CD34−, and CD45− (Fig. 4). These characteristics compare favorably with the surface marker profiles of MSCs reported by other studies [29, 30].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Micrographs of A, B primary ADMSCs cultured for 24 h and B 7 days and C cells at the third passage

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Identification of ADMSCs surface markers

Full size image

Gross examination

Four weeks after operation, all grafts (Groups C–E) or the native tendon (Group A) showed different degrees of adhesion to the surrounding fascia, with the lightest adhesion observed in Group A and most severe adhesion in Group B. Groups C, D, and E had similar degrees of adhesion. All grafts (Groups C–E) were connected intimately to the adjacent tendinous tissue.

Histology

HE staining

The sections of Group A (Fig. 5A) showed a small number of spindle-shaped tenocytes distributed in a dense matrix of oriented collagen fibers. Group B had abundant spindle-shaped cells distributed in collagen fibers lacking an orientation (Fig. 5B). Group C–E all showed abundant cells aligned along a matrix of oriented collagen fibers (Fig. 5C–E). In Group C, the majority of cells were rounded with a small proportion appearing spindle-shaped, whereas in Groups D and E the cells were predominantly spindle-shaped. Groups D and E showed generally oriented collagen fibers and increased extracellular matrix (ECM) production compared with Group C, with Group E outperforming Group D in ECM content. Moreover, Group D appeared to display a slightly greater cellularity than Group E. The difference between the two groups needs to be further analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Photomicrographs of sections from Groups A–E (HE staining)

Full size image

Masson’s trichrome staining

After Masson’s trichrome staining, collagen fibers stained blue; the cytoplasm red; and the nuclei black (Fig. 6). In Group A, a small number of cells were dispersed in compact and well oriented collagen fibers. In Group B, cells were distributed along collagen fibers that were less oriented (vs. Group A). Groups C–E appeared generally similar, with cells distributed along collagen fibers arranged in parallel bundles. Careful observation suggested that, the compactness of collagen fibers appeared to vary slightly, following an order of Group E > Group D > Group C.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Photomicrographs of sections from Groups A to E (Masson trichrome staining, 4 weeks after operation)

Full size image

Immunohistochemical staining

Tenomodulin (Tnmd) has been identified as a type-II transmembrane glycoprotein principally expressed in tendons and ligaments [31]. Transcription factor Mohawk homeobox (MKX) is an important regulator of tenogenic differentiation [32, 33]. Recent studies reported that, collagen type I expression and Achilles tendon in mice were defective when the MKX gene was knocked out [32, 34]. Given the importance of Tnmd and MKX in tendon development, we performed immunohistochemical staining of the two proteins to compare the outcome of tendon repair in Groups D and E.

Four weeks after operation, extensive production of Tnmd and MKX was detected in the regenerated tendon-like tissues in Groups D and E (Fig. 7A), with Group E exhibiting a more intense (vs. Group D) staining of Tnmd and MKX. Image analysis of the sections found that, Group E had a significantly higher percentage of MKX+ cells than Group D (p = 0.001) (Fig. 7B). This suggests that, compared with Group D, Group E supported an improved generation of tendon-like tissue in this model.

Fig. 7
figure 7

A Photomicrographs of sections from Groups D and E immunohistochemically stained for Tnmd and MKX; B Comparison of the proportions of MKX + cells measured from photomicrographs in A (n = 5). (**p < 0.01)

Full size image

Immunofluorescent staining

Four weeks after operation, numerous CM-Dil-labeled ADMSCs were seen in sections from Groups D and E, with those in Group E appearing more aligned and narrower. MKX+ cells were also detected in the two groups by triple immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig. 8A). Image analysis found that, compared with Group D, Group E had a higher proportion of ADMSCs simultaneously positive for both MKX and CM-Dil (p = 0.003) (Fig. 8B). These findings suggest that, ADMSCs seeded in the SIS scaffolds differentiated into MKX+ cells in the regenerated tendon-like tissue, and the hypoxic preconditioning enhanced their differentiation.

Fig. 8
figure 8

A Photomicrographs of sections from Groups D and E immunofluorescently stained for MKX; B comparison of the proportions of MKX+ cells measured from photomicrographs in A (n = 5) (**p < 0.01)

Full size image

Tensile load

Four weeks after operation (Fig. 9), the peak load (i.e., force at rupture) of samples from Group E (32.34 ± 2.71 N) was significantly higher than those from Group D (27.78 ± 2.11 N) (p = 0.003) and Group C (20.33 ± 1.47 N) (p < 0.001). The ultimate load recorded from Group D was significantly higher than that that of Group C (p < 0.001). Additionally, the ultimate load of Group A (41.12 ± 1.23 N) was significantly higher than that of Group B (37.62 ± 1.54 N) (p = 0.027). The ultimate load of Group E reached 78% (p < 0.001) of that of Group A and 85% (p < 0.001) of that of Group B, although both differences remained statistically significant. All samples failed at the middle third. These indicate that, seeding of ADMSCs significantly increased the strength of the regenerated tendon-like tissue (vs. grafting of cell-free SIS scaffolds) at Week 4, and the hypoxic preconditioning further significantly improved the strength.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Ultimate tensile failure loads measured at Week 4 (n = 6) (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)

Full size image

Discussion

The current study found that, (1) compared with the grafts of cell-free SIS, grafting of SIS containing seeded ADMSCs yielded tendon-like tissue with improved histological and mechanical properties, and (2) compared with normoxic preconditioning, hypoxic pre-conditioning of ADMSCs increased the ultimate load and histological characteristics of the new tissue.

SIS is a natural, acellular ECM hosting a partially aligned collagen type-I matrix and a variety of growth factors [35]. Previous studies reported positive results from the use of cell-free SIS in managing soft tissue defects in animal models (e.g., Achilles tendon [10], flexor tendon [36], rotator cuff [35], patellar [37]). Other studies seeded ADMSCs on decellularized tendon scaffolds, and observed increased tendon marker gene expression, enhanced type-I collagen synthesis, and improved mechanical and biological characteristics [38,39,40]. However, no previous study has explored the seeding of ADMSCs on SIS for tendon repair.

ADMSCs from subcutaneous adipose tissues are similar to BMSCs in morphology and cell surface markers. Additionally, both cells possess the ability of self-renewal and multilineage potential [33, 41]. Behfar and Nixon et al. [20, 42] managed flexor tendon injury by injection of ADMSCs, and observed improved collagen fiber organization, tendon structure, and yield loads. Park et al. [43] reported the expression of scleraxis and Tenomodulin in cultured ADMSCs treated with IGF-1 and TGFβ or GDF-5. Kryger et al. [44] reported that, ADMSCs and BMSCs behaved similarly in adhesion and proliferation on scaffolds. These suggest ADMSCs to be a possible and less invasively available substitute to BMSCs in tendon tissue engineering.

Compared with the new tendon-like tissue regenerated in Group C, those in Group D and E possessed higher collagen fiber alignment and ultimate loads, suggesting that ADMSCs may have contributed to the production of the new tendon-like tissues. Wang et al. [45] reported that, the BMSCs seeded in SIS significantly increased pancreatic islet function in rats. Hodde et al. [46] found that SIS retained significant bioactivity and had low immunogenicity to support murine fibroblasts attachment and stimulate pheochromocytoma cell differentiation. In a porcine in vivo epicardial study, Chang et al. [8] observed that seeding of BMSCs on SIS reduced the in vivo adaptive immune response to SIS. In the present study, no macrophages were not observed in HE-stained sections surrounding the implanted scaffolds with or without ADMSCs. Additionally, no sign of fibrous encapsulation or scar formation was observed in gross or histological examination. These suggested the absence of evident immune rejection of the scaffolds, which may be explained by several factors. First, decellularized biomaterials were reported to elicit a relatively weak immune rejection [47]. Second, the SIS scaffolds were isolated from young pigs, and biomaterials harvested from young animals are associated with more tissue remodeling response than immune rejection [48]. Moreover, earlier studies have been reported that ADMSCs are relatively immunogenic [49, 50].

Previous studies have reported that, hypoxic pre-conditioning of ADMSCs enhanced their proliferation, stemness, and angiogenic potential [37, 51, 52]. The present study found that, hypoxic pre-conditioning improved histological characteristics, ultimate tensile load, and expression of tendon-related gene markers in the regenerated tendon-like tissue (Groups E vs. D), consistent with an earlier report [53] that hypoxia enhanced the tenocytic differentiation of AMDSCs. The present study did not investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying these improvements, but several possibilities may be suggested. First, the oxygen partial pressure in the adipose tissue is ~ 2–8% [54], and the oxygen tension in the tendon defect area is also low [55]. Thus, pre-conditioning at 2% O2 tension may have increased the in vivo viability of ADMSC after grafting into the defect. Second, hypoxic pre-conditioning may have enhanced the potential of ADMSCs to differentiate into tenocytes [51, 56]. Additionally, hypoxia may have upregulated the secretion of cytokines (e.g., TGFs, angiogenic factor, VEGF, SDF-1/CXCR4, FGF), which play roles in tendon regeneration [29].

CM-DiI has been used to label the cell membrane for fluorescence microscopy due to several advantages, and it does not affect the proliferation and differentiation of the cells [57]. The CM-DiI labels can be retained stably on the cell membrane and detected in daughter cells during their proliferation. Moreover, the efficiency of CM-DiI labeling is relatively high. Thus, this procedure has been considered as a convenient and effective method for steadily tracking cells during in vivo experiments [58]. Four weeks after operation, CM-DiI-labeled ADMSCs were detected in the regenerated tissues in Groups D and E, indicating that they were still viable and their cellular morphology could be identified after staining by DAPI. Triple immunofluorescent staining of CM-DiI, DAPI, and MKX further demonstrated that CM-DiI-labeled ADMSCs in both Groups D and E were positive for MKX, a tenocyte-specific protein. This demonstrates that the ADMSCs preconditioned under either hypoxic or normoxic conditions differentiated into tenocyte-like cells. Furthermore, the proportion of the differentiated ADMSCs was higher in the ADMSCs treated by hypoxic preconditioning compared with those receiving normoxic one.

This study involves several limitations. First, the signaling pathways underlying the positive effects of the hypoxic pre-conditioning were not investigated. Second, only single O2 pressure, time, and cell seeding dose were used during pre-conditioning; as a result, optimal conditions and curative effects were not established. Moreover, as in vivo study was completed at Week 4, it remains unknown how the regenerated tissue compares with the intact one on a longer time scale. These need to be answered by systematic studies in the future.

Conclusion

The engineered tendon graft created by seeding ADMSCs on SIS is superior to cell-free SIS.

The hypoxic precondition further improved the expression of tendon-related genes by the seeded ADMSCs in SIS, and increased the rupture load after grafting in the Achilles tendon defects. Finally, ADMSCs seeded on SIS can survive and differentiate into tenocyte-like cells in vivo, and hypoxia may promote the progress of differentiation. These new findings support the application of ADMSCs and hypoxic preconditioning in tendon tissue engineering.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury. 2008;39(12):1338–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Docheva D, Muller SA, Majewski M, Evans CH. Biologics for tendon repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;84:222–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uysal AC, Mizuno H. Tendon regeneration and repair with adipose derived stem cells. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2010;5(2):161–7. https://doi.org/10.2174/157488810791268609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dhinsa BS, Mahapatra AN, Khan WS. Sources of adult mesenchymal stem cells for ligament and tendon tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;10(1):26–30. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574888x09666140710102808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Q, Chang C, Qian C, Xiao W, Zhu H, Guo J, et al. Photo-crosslinkable amniotic membrane hydrogel for skin defect healing. Acta Biomater. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2021.02.043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Derwin K, Androjna C, Spencer E, Safran O, Bauer TW, Hunt T, et al. Porcine small intestine submucosa as a flexor tendon graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;423:245–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000131235.91264.d7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi JW, Park JK, Chang JW, Kim DY, Kim MS, Shin YS, et al. Small intestine submucosa and mesenchymal stem cells composite gel for scarless vocal fold regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35(18):4911–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CW, Petrie T, Clark A, Lin X, Sondergaard CS, Griffiths LG. Mesenchymal stem cell seeding of porcine small intestinal submucosal extracellular matrix for cardiovascular applications. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(4):e0153412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153412.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Androjna C, Spragg RK, Derwin KA. Mechanical conditioning of cell-seeded small intestine submucosa: a potential tissue-engineering strategy for tendon repair. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(2):233–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.0050.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gilbert TW, Stewart-Akers AM, Simmons-Byrd A, Badylak SF. Degradation and remodeling of small intestinal submucosa in canine achilles tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(3):621–30. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00742.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Badylak SF, Record R, Lindberg K, Hodde J, Park K. Small intestinal submucosa: a substrate for in vitro cell growth. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1998;9(8):863–78. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856298x00208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Q, Ding G, Xu X. Immunomodulatory functions of mesenchymal stem cells and possible mechanisms. Histol Histopathol. 2016;31(9):949–59. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-11-750.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5411.143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bruder SP, Jaiswal N, Ricalton NS, Mosca JD, Kraus KH, Kadiyala S. Mesenchymal stem cells in osteobiology and applied bone regeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:S247-256. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arvidson K, Abdallah BM, Applegate LA, Baldini N, Cenni E, Gomez-Barrena E, et al. Bone regeneration and stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15(4):718–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01224.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrilleaux B, Phinney DG, Prockop DJ, et al. Review: ex vivo engineering of living tissues with adult stem cells. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(11):3007–19. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2006.12.3007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ciapetti G, Granchi D, Baldini N. The combined use of mesenchymal stromal cells and scaffolds for bone repair. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;18(13):1796–820. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161212799859648.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes M, Valente S, Sabongi R, Gomes Dos Santos J, Leite V, Ulrich H, et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells for peripheral nerve regeneration. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13(1):100–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.224378.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Schäffler A, Büchler C. Concise review: adipose tissue-derived stromal cells–basic and clinical implications for novel cell-based therapies. Stem Cells. 2007;25(4):818–27. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2006-0589.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nixon AJ, Dahlgren LA, Haupt JL, Yeager AE, Ward DL. Effect of adipose-derived nucleated cell fractions on tendon repair in horses with collagenase-induced tendinitis. Am J Vet Res. 2008;69(7):928–37. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.69.7.928.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Uysal C, Tobita M, Hyakusoku H, Mizuno H. Adipose-derived stem cells enhance primary tendon repair: biomechanical and immunohistochemical evaluation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(12):1712–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2012.06.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Theus MH, Wei L, Cui L, Francis K, Hu X, Keogh C, et al. In vitro hypoxic preconditioning of embryonic stem cells as a strategy of promoting cell survival and functional benefits after transplantation into the ischemic rat brain. Exp Neurol. 2008;210(2):656–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.12.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang T, Yew T, Chiang E, Ma H, Hsu C, Hsu S, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from a hypoxic culture improve and engraft Achilles tendon repair. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(5):1117–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513480786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xia X, Chiu P, Lam P, Chin W, Ng E, Lau J. Secretome from hypoxia-conditioned adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promotes the healing of gastric mucosal injury in a rodent model. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864(1):178–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.10.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Portron S, Merceron C, Gauthier O, Lesoeur J, Sourice S, Masson M, et al. Effects of in vitro low oxygen tension preconditioning of adipose stromal cells on their in vivo chondrogenic potential: application in cartilage tissue repair. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e62368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062368.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Przybyt E, Krenning G, Brinker M, Harmsen M. Adipose stromal cells primed with hypoxia and inflammation enhance cardiomyocyte proliferation rate in vitro through STAT3 and Erk1/2. J Transl Med. 2013;11:39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tan MY, Zhi W, Wei RQ, Huang YC, Zhou KP, Tan B, et al. Repair of infarcted myocardium usingmesenchymal stem cell seeded small intestinal submucosa in rabbits. Biomaterials. 2009;30(19):3234–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo X, Xia B, Lu X, Zhang Z, Li Z, Li W, et al. Grafting of mesenchymal stem cell-seeded small intestinal submucosa to repair the deep partial-thickness burns. Connect Tissue Res. 2016;57(5):388–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/03008207.2016.1193173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang X, Liu C, Li S, Xu Y, Chen P, Liu Y, et al. Hypoxia precondition promotes adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells based repair of diabetic erectile dysfunction via augmenting angiogenesis and neuroprotection. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0118951. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118951.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li H, Tao Y, Liang C, Han B, Li F, Chen G, et al. Influence of hypoxia in the intervertebral disc on the biological behaviors of rat adipose- and nucleus pulposus-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cells Tissues Organs. 2013;198(4):266–77. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Docheva D, Hunziker EB, Fässler R, Brandau O. Tenomodulin is necessary for tenocyte proliferation and tendon maturation. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(2):699–705. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.2.699-705.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ito Y, Toriuchi N, Yoshitaka T, Ueno-Kudoh H, Sato T, Yokoyama S, et al. The mohawk homeobox gene is a critical regulator of tendon differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(23):10538–42. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000525107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu W, Watson SS, Lan Y, Keene DR, Ovitt CE, Liu H, et al. The atypical homeodomain transcription factor mohawk controls tendon morphogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(20):4797–807. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00207-10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Murchison ND, Price BA, Conner DA, Keene DR, Olson EN, Tabin CJ, et al. Regulation of tendon differentiation by scleraxis distinguishes force-transmitting tendons from muscle-anchoring tendons. Development. 2007;134(14):2697–708. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.001933.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zalavras CG, Gardocki R, Huang E, Stevanovic M, Hedman T, Tibone J. Reconstruction of large rotator cuff tendon defects with porcine small intestinal submucosa in an animal model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(2):224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Murphy KD, Mushkudiani IA, Kao D, Levesque AY, Hawkins HK, Gould LJ. Successful incorporation of tissue-engineered porcine small-intestinal submucosa as substitute flexor tendon graft is mediated by elevated tgf-beta1 expression in the rabbit. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(7):1168–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Karaoglu S, Fisher MB, Woo SL, Fu YC, Liang R, Abramowitch SD. Use of a bioscaffold to improve healing of a patellar tendon defect after graft harvest for acl reconstruction: a study in rabbits. J Orthop Res. 2008;26(2):255–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Schmitt T, Fox PM, Woon CY, Farnebo SJ, Bronstein JA, Behn A, et al. Human flexor tendon tissue engineering: in vivo effects of stem cell reseeding. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(4):567e–76e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a033cf.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Martinello T, Bronzini I, Volpin A, Vindigni V, Maccatrozzo L, Caporale G, et al. Successful recellularization of human tendon scaffolds using adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and collagen gel. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014;8(8):612–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1557.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Youngstrom DW, LaDow JE, Barrett JG. Tenogenesis of bone marrow-, adipose-, and tendon-derived stem cells in a dynamic bioreactor. Connect Tissue Res. 2016;57(6):454–65. https://doi.org/10.3109/03008207.2015.1117458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yoshimura H, Muneta T, Nimura A, Yokoyama A, Koga H, Sekiya I. Comparison of rat mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow, synovium, periosteum, adipose tissue, and muscle. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;327(3):449–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-006-0308-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Behfar M, Sarrafzadeh-Rezaei F, Hobbenaghi R, Delirezh N, Dalir-Naghadeh B. Enhanced mechanical properties of rabbit flexor tendons in response to intratendinous injection of adipose derived stromal vascular fraction. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2012;7(3):173–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/157488812799859874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Park A, Hogan MV, Kesturu GS, James R, Balian G, Chhabra AB. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells treated with growth differentiation factor-5 express tendon-specific markers. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16(9):2941–51. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0710.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kryger GS, Chong AK, Costa M, Pham H, Bates SJ, Chang J. A comparison of tenocytes and mesenchymal stem cells for use in flexor tendon tissue engineering. J Hand Surg Am. 2007;32(5):597–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.02.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang D, Ding X, Xue W, Zheng J, Tian X, Li Y, et al. A new scaffold containing small intestinal submucosa and mesenchymal stem cells improves pancreatic islet function and survival in vitro and in vivo. Int J Mol Med. 2017;39(1):167–73. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2016.2814.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hodde J, Janis A, Hiles M. Effects of sterilization on an extracellular matrix scaffold: part II. Bioactivity and matrix interaction. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2007;18(4):545–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-007-2301-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Badylak S, Brown B, Gilbert T, Daly K, Huber A, Turner N. Biologic scaffolds for constructive tissue remodeling. Biomaterials. 2011;32(1):316–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sicari B, Johnson S, Siu B, Crapo P, Daly K, Jiang H, et al. The effect of source animal age upon the in vivo remodeling characteristics of an extracellular matrix scaffold. Biomaterials. 2012;33(22):5524–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. González M, Gonzalez-Rey E, Rico L, Büscher D, Delgado M. Treatment of experimental arthritis by inducing immune tolerance with human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(4):1006–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. DelaRosa O, Lombardo E, Beraza A, Mancheño-Corvo P, Ramirez C, Menta R, et al. Requirement of IFN-gamma-mediated indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in the modulation of lymphocyte proliferation by human adipose-derived stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(10):2795–806. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEA.2008.0630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fotia C, Massa A, Boriani F, Baldini N, Granchi D. Hypoxia enhances proliferation and stemness of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Cytotechnology. 2015;67(6):1073–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-014-9731-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Saad A, Zhu XY, Herrmann S, Hickson L, Tang H, Dietz AB, et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease have increased DNA damage and reduced angiogenesis that can be modified by hypoxia. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):128. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-016-0389-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yu Y, Zhou Y, Cheng T, Lu X, Yu K, Zhou Y, et al. Hypoxia enhances tenocyte differentiation of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells by inducing hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in a co-culture system. Cell Prolif. 2016;49(2):173–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Pasarica M, Sereda OR, Redman LM, Albarado DC, Hymel DT, Roan LE, et al. Reduced adipose tissue oxygenation in human obesity: evidence for rarefaction, macrophage chemotaxis, and inflammation without an angiogenic response. Diabetes. 2009;58(3):718–25. https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-1098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sivakumar B, Akhavani M, Winlove C, Taylor P, Paleolog E, Kang N. Synovial hypoxia as a cause of tendon rupture in rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(1):49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.09.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Valorani MG, Montelatici E, Germani A, Biddle A, D’Alessandro D, Strollo R, et al. Pre-culturing human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells under hypoxia increases their adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation potentials. Cell Prolif. 2012;45(3):225–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2184.2012.00817.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Dai W, Hale SL, Martin BJ, Kuang JQ, Dow JS, Wold LE, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in postinfarcted rat myocardium: short- and long-term effects. Circulation. 2005;112(2):214–23. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.527937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Li N, Yang H, Lu L, Duan C, Zhao C, Zhao H. Comparison of the labeling efficiency of brdu, dii and fish labeling techniques in bone marrow stromal cells. Brain Res. 2008;1215:11–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations

Funding

This work was supported by National Science Foundation of China (Nos. 31271049, 31570970).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xing Guo, Hui Lv, and Zhongwei Fan contributed equally to this study

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China

    Xing Guo, Hui Lv, Ke Duan, Jie Liang, LongFei Zou, Hao Xue, DengHua Huang, YuanHui Wang & MeiYun Tan

  2. Sichuan Provincial Lab of Orthopaedic Engineering, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China

    Xing Guo, Hui Lv, Ke Duan, Jie Liang, LongFei Zou, Hao Xue, DengHua Huang, YuanHui Wang & MeiYun Tan

  3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First People’s Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, 641100, Sichuan, China

    ZhongWei Fan

Authors
  1. Xing Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hui Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. ZhongWei Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ke Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jie Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. LongFei Zou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hao Xue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. DengHua Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. YuanHui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. MeiYun Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XG, YHW and MYT participated in the conception and study design. HL, KD drafted the manuscript and performed article revision. YHW and ZWF carried out the studies. LFZ was responsible for the acquisition of data. HX and DHH analyzed and interpreted the data. The authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to MeiYun Tan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the institutional review board of The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (Application Number 20161215001). All studies were performed in agreement with the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care and guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the university.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, X., Lv, H., Fan, Z. et al. Effects of hypoxia on Achilles tendon repair using adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells seeded small intestinal submucosa. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 570 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02713-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02713-x

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X