- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Comment on “Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients”
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 16, Article number: 553 (2021)
Recently, Hu et al. have published the article “Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients” . We read it with great interest. We would like to congratulate for their laudable efforts to perform this meticulous retrospective analysis on this intriguing subject. However, I would request the authors to further clarify upon certain points mentioned below so that the results could be more clearly interpreted and a similar study could be reproduced.
Statistical analysis. The authors mentioned “discrete variables were reported as numbers (percentage of total)”, but the statistical methods are not mentioned. A discrete variable is a variable whose value is obtained by counting. In contrast, continuous variable is a variable whose value is obtained by measuring . Operation time, perioperative blood loss, and Harris score should be continuous variables, not discrete variables. The statistical analysis of discrete variables using continuous variables may eventually lead to bias.
Study population. In the study population, the authors mentioned that “with a minimum of 6 months follow-up” were included in the study. However, in the results, the authors also mentioned that “all patients received at least 1 year of clinical follow-up”; it seems to be a contradiction.
Results. In the results, surgical time of FNS and CCS was 79.75 ± 26.35 min vs. 64.58 ± 18.56 ml, which is incorrect. It should be 79.75 ± 26.35 min vs. 64.58 ± 18.56 min.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Hu H, Cheng J, Feng M, Gao Z, Wu J, Lu S. Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 9;16(1):370. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02517-z.
Joshi KD. Foundations of discrete mathematics. New Age International Limited; 1989. p. 7.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, Y., Wang, G. Comment on “Clinical outcome of femoral neck system versus cannulated compression screws for fixation of femoral neck fracture in younger patients”. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 553 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02709-7