Skip to main content

Comprehensive analysis of metabolism-related lncRNAs related to the progression and prognosis in osteosarcoma from TCGA

Abstract

Background

Osteosarcoma is one of the most common malignant neoplasms in children and adolescents. Studies have shown that metabolism-related pathways are vital for the development and metastasis of osteosarcoma. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) plays a key role in the occurrence and progression of cancer in a variety of ways. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms of metabolism-related lncRNA in osteosarcoma remain to be deeply elucidated.

Methods

In this study, all metabolism-related mRNAs and lncRNAs in osteosarcoma were extracted and identified based on transcriptomic data from the TCGA database. Usingsurvival analysis, univariate and multivariate independent prognostic analysis, gene set enrichment analysis, and nomogram, a prognostic signature with metabolic lncRNAs as prognostic factors was constructed.

Results

Nine prognostic factors included lncRNA AC009779.2, lncRNA AL591895.1, lncRNA AC026271.3, lncRNA LPP-AS2, lncRNA LINC01857, lncRNA AP005264.1, lncRNA LINC02454, lncRNA AL133338.1, and lncRNA AC135178.5, respectively. Survival analysis indicated that alterations of specific lncRNA expression were strongly correlated with poor prognosis in osteosarcoma. Univariate and multivariate independent prognostic analysis showed that the prognostic signature had a good independent predictive ability for patient survival. The results of GSEA suggested that these predictors may be involved in the metabolism of certain substances or energy in cancer. The nomogram was further drawn for clinical guidance and assistance in clinical decision-making.

Conclusions

This study identified multiple metabolism-related lncRNAs, which may be novel therapeutic targets for osteosarcoma, and contributed to better explore the specific metabolic regulatory mechanisms of lncRNA in osteosarcoma.

Introduction

Osteosarcoma, one of the most common Sarcoma, is usually diagnosed during childhood and adolescence [1]. Due to always occurring in the metaphysis of long bones and progressing rapidly, it often results in inconvenient or even restricted movement of patients [1]. Although effective progress has been made in current amputation and chemotherapy, patient prognosis is far from satisfactory, with 20% of patients metastasized at diagnosis [2]. Patients with metastatic osteosarcoma have a lower survival rate [3], which demands a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying osteosarcoma progression and metastasis. Therefore, it is particularly important to explore new therapeutic targets and accurate prognostic markers. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) has been shown to play an important regulatory role in the occurrence, development, and metastasis of all kinds of cancers [4,5,6]. Recently, the research on the abnormal expression of lncRNA in osteosarcoma has become ever more in-depth [7, 8]. On the other hand, growth of bone tissue is inextricably linked to bone metabolism [9]. Abnormal bone metabolism can lead to loss of control of bone growth or abnormal differentiation, which further results in osteoma or osteosarcoma [9]. Despite many therapeutic targets and prognostic markers for osteosarcoma have been reported, such as immunomodulation, tumor infiltrating immune cells could be used as a prognosis factor in osteosarcoma patients [10], Niu et. al had found that EGR1, CXCL10, MYC and CXCR4 could be regarded as potential biomarker of osteosarcoma [11]. Few reports show that lncRNA affects osteosarcoma by regulating the metabolic process [12], and the roles of most lncRNAs in regulating the metabolism of osteosarcoma remain unclear.

In this study, gene expression data and clinical information were available from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Metabolic genes and related lncRNAs were further extracted. Nine Metabolism-related lncRNAs (MRlncRNAs) associated with high prognosis were finally obtained with various bioinformatics analysis methods. We further constructed and verified a prognostic signature of osteosarcoma. This study explains the possible metabolic epigenetic mechanism and provides new therapeutic targets of osteosarcoma.

Materials and methods

Data downloading and processing

All transcriptions data of osteosarcoma samples were downloaded from the TCGA database [13]. There was a total of 265 samples. After removing duplicated and extremely low expression genes, the mRNA and lncRNA matrixes were extracted, respectively. The c2.cp.kegg.v7.2.Symbols.Gmt from the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) database was downloaded [14], a total of 940 related genes in metabolic pathways were extracted. Furthermore, the intersection of the extracted mRNA matrix was taken to obtain the expression data of 935 metabolic genes.

Preliminary Screening of MRlncRNA

By using the correlation test in R 4.0.3, 335 lncRNAs that highly related to metabolic genes (corFilter = 0.6, pvalueFilter = 0.001) were acquired. 15 lncRNAs significantly related to prognosis were obtained by combining with year of survival through Kaplan–Meier survival (P < 0.05) analysis and univariable Cox regression survival (P < 0.05) analysis.

Construction and evaluation of prognostic signature

We used “glmnet” package in R 4.0.3 to perform Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression analysis, and further used the multivariable Cox regression analysis to obtain prognosis-related metabolic lncRNA. These factors were used to construct a prognostic signature. Then, the risk score signature for prognostic metabolism of lncRNA was established according to the following formula: Risk Score (RS) = ∑β(MRlncRNA) × Exp(MRlncRNA). β represents the coefficient of the multivariable Cox regression analysis. Exp(MRlncRNA) means the individual prognostic metabolic lncRNA expression value. The risk score of each osteosarcoma patient was calculated accurately, then, all patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups through the median risk score. In addition, a survival curve was drawn to assess the difference in survival between the two groups by utilizing the “survival” package in R 4.0.3.

Metabolism-related mRNA-lncRNA network construction

Nine hundred thirty five metabolic genes and 335 MRlncRNAs extracted from the TCGA database were utilized to construct the co-expression network. Similarly, we also constructed the network of lncRNAs and related metabolic genes with prognostic signatures. The visual co-expression network was produced by Cytoscape 3.7.2.

Independent prognosis and clinical correlation analysis

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were applied to determine independent clinical prognostic factors, that is, whether individual lncRNA has a potential impact on certain clinical features or not. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Survival analysis

By using the R “survival” package, the risk model was analyzed and evaluated whether the high- or low-risk group was related to survival. Similarly, each prognostic factor was divided into high- and low-expression groups according to the median expression value, then the survival curve was drawn. P value < 0.05 was statistically significant.

Nomogram drawing and evaluation

The nomogram was drawn with the known clinicopathological data and the risk score. Firstly, the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate its representativeness. Secondly, the C index was used to evaluate its predictive ability. In addition, the calibration curves of 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were established to evaluate the accuracy of the nomogram. Finally, to reduce the dimensionality of the data and figure out whether or not an individual lncRNA could distinguish patients' risk groups, we performed principal component analysis (PCA).

Result

The entire research process is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow diagram of entire data analysis

Screening of MRlncRNAs

By downloading the transcriptions data of osteosarcoma patients, the mRNA and lncRNA matrixes were extracted, respectively. A total of 940 genes related to metabolic pathways were acquired from the GSEA database. The expression data of 935 metabolic genes were extracted accurately. And 335 lncRNAs, which are closely correlated with metabolic genes, were obtained by correlation test in the R. These lncRNAs. A network of 935 metabolic genes and 335 related lncRNA was constructed and visualized by Cytoscape (Fig. 2). Most mRNAs and lncRNAs in this network have a one-to-many or many-to-one relationship, which initially reveals the complexity and extensiveness of lncRNAs network regulation. After incorporating the complete prognostic information, we utilized Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and univariate Cox regression survival analysis to obtain 15 lncRNAs significantly related to the prognosis (Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure2

mRNA-lncRNA network of 935 metabolic genes and 335 metabolic-related lncRNAs

Construction and evaluation of risk signature

To further reduce and optimize the signature, the R “glmnet” package was used to perform LASSO regression analysis, and the model showed best fits when λ = -3 and N = 9 (Fig. 3a-b). We further used the multivariate Cox regression analysis to obtain nine prognostic metabolic lncRNA and drew a forest map (Fig. 3c). It reveals that lncRNA AC026271.3, lncRNA LINC02454, lncRNA AL133338.1, and lncRNA AC135178.5 are high-risk factors for patient survival time and status, which implies that these four lncRNAs may act as carcinogens. Since lncRNA AC009779.2 is a low-risk factor, it is very likely to become a protective factor. Then we used these 9 factors to construct a prognostic risk signature:

Fig. 3
figure3

The prognostic signature was established and validated based on nine prognostic metabolic lncRNAs. a LASSO coefficient profiles of the lncRNAs associated with the metabolism of osteosarcoma, b Partial likelihood deviance is plotted versus log (λ). c The forest map shows multivariable COX analysis of prognostic signatures. d The survival curve indicates the difference between high and low risk group. e The risk curves were reordered based on the risk score of each patient. f The scatter plot displayed the overall survival in osteosarcoma patients. g The heatmap revealed the expression levels of metabolic lncRNAs

Risk Score (RS) = AC009779.2*-0.08566 + AL591895.1*-0.03249 + AC026271.3*0.116683 + LPP-AS2*-0.22239 + LINC01857*-0.35896 + AP005264.1*-0.21311 + LINC02454*0.065331 + AL133338 0.1*0.120016 + AC135178.5*0.134252.

According to this formula, regarding the median risk score as the grouping standard, we can accurately calculate the risk score of each osteosarcoma patient. Then all patients were subdivided into high- or low-risk groups. The survival difference between the two groups was evaluated by drawing a survival curve (Fig. 3d). Patients in the low-risk group were under a higher survival rate while patients in the high risk group had a worse survival rate (P < 0.001). In addition, we drew a risk curve and a heat map of the expression of the nine lncRNAs in all samples based on the constructed signatures (Fig. 3e-g). This signature can accurately distinguish high-risk patients from low-risk groups through different risk score and survival time.

Network construction of lncRNAs and related mRNAs

In the next step, we also constructed a grid of nine lncRNAs and their related metabolic genes. Figure 4a shows a Sankey diagram constructed based on co-expression relationships. The left part shows related metabolic genes. The middle part indicates lncRNAs that are highly related to metabolic genes, and the right part represents prognostic types of lncRNAs. For example, LINC01857 may have a co-expression relationship with DGKA, PLCG2, and PLA2G2D, which means that some interactions or mutual regulation mechanisms exist between them. In addition, lncRNA LINC01857 shows a protective role, suggesting that it may act as a tumor suppressor gene in the development of cancer. Similarly, results of Cytoscape 3.7.2 (Fig. 4c) intuitively reveal the mRNA-lncRNA co-expression relationships.

Fig. 4
figure4

mRNA-lncRNA network of nine prognosis-related metabolic lncRNA and independent prognostic analysis. a The Sankey diagram showed nine metabolic lncRNAs in the mRNA-lncRNA network. b The univariate Cox analysis of independent prognostic signature. c Nine metabolic lncRNAs in the mRNA-lncRNA network in Cytoscape. d The multivariate Cox analysis of independent prognostic signature. e The multi-index ROC curves among prognostic signature and other clinical features

Independent prognosis and clinical correlation analysis

Next, to determine whether it applies to guide clinical decision-making or assist in evaluating the prognosis, we verified the independent prognostic capacity of the prognostic signature constructed above by using the univariate Cox regression analysis respectively. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio of the risk score is 1.538 (1.313–1.802) and is statistically significant (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4b). Similarly, in the multivariate regression analysis, the hazard ratio of the risk score is 1.549 (1.286–1.865) and reveals a significant statistical significance (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4d). Furthermore, the multi-index ROC curve showed that the risk score has better diagnostic and recognition capabilities for patients with osteosarcoma (AUC = 0.861) than other clinical features (Fig. 4e). In addition, we further analyzed whether a single lncRNA has a potential impact on certain clinical characteristics (Fig. 5). For example, as shown in Fig. 5a, lncRNA AL591895, lncRNA LINC02454, and lncRNA AL133338.1 show definite differences in tumor populations over and under 65 years of age and younger (P value < 0.05). Similarly, lncRNA AC026271.3 and lncRNA AL133338.1 also show partial expression differences for patients of different genders (P value < 0.05) in Fig. 5b. LncRNA AC009779.2 appears to be related to cancer metastasis (P value < 0.01) in Fig. 5c.

Fig. 5
figure5

Correlation analysis of clinical features and individual metabolic lncRNA. Violin diagrams of correlations between (a) age, (b) gender, and (c) metastasis and the expression value of each metabolic lncRNA

Prognostic survival analysis of MRlncRNA

To further evaluate the independent prognostic capacity of single lncRNA in the signature, we divided each lncRNA into high- and low-expression groups according to the median expression value and drew the survival curve (Fig. 6). It reveals that all nine prognostic factors are statistically significant, and patients with two different prognoses can be distinguished. It further illustrates that they may play potential anti-cancer or carcinogenic roles in osteosarcoma.

Fig. 6
figure6

Survival analysis. The survival curve displayed the different overall survival between high- and low-expression groups of each metabolic lncRNA

GSEA analysis

Signed risk scores were divided into high- and low-risk groups according to the median value, and GSEA analysis was performed on all samples (Fig. 7). In the biological process of gene ontology (GO), we can see the enrichment of multiple biological processes related to bone metabolism. The high-risk groups are significantly enriched in CHONDROCYTE DEVELOPMENT, EMBRYONIC CRANIAL SKELETON MORPHOGENESIS, EMBRYONIC SKELETAL SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT, EMBRYONIC SKELETAL SYSTEM MORPHOGENESIS and HEPARAN SULFATE PROTEOGLYCAN BIOSYNTHETIC PROCESS. The low-risk groups are significantly enriched in the ACTIVATION OF PHOSPHOLIPASE C ACTIVITY, BASE CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION EDITING, POLYSACCHARIDE CATABOLIC PROCESS, POLYSACCHARIDE CATABOLIC PROCESS and REGULATION OF CALCIUM MEDIATED SIGNALING pathways (Fig. 7a). Figure 7b and c reflect the cell component and molecular function of the high- and low-risk groups, respectively. Figure 7d shows the aggregation of metabolic pathways and cancer pathways in the high- and low-risk groups in KEGG. In conclusion, GSEA analysis further describes the potential biological functions of prognostic factors.

Fig. 7
figure7

GSEA analysis. A multi-GSEA plot of the main enrichment pathways of BP (a), CC (b), and MF (c) in GO. A multi-GSEA plot of the main enrichment pathways of KEGG (d)

Nomogram drawing and PCA

To make the signature to facilitate clinical prognosis guidance, we drew a nomogram by using available clinical-pathological data and risk score we signed (Fig. 8a). Then, the ROC curve (AUC = 0.839) indicates the nomogram is well representative (Fig. 8b). Further the C index (0.812) establishes that the nomogram has a good distinguishing performance. In addition, we also developed a calibration curve using 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates to estimate the accuracy of the nomogram (Fig. 8c). It indicates that the nomogram evaluation of the 3-year survival rate is the most accurate. Finally, to better reflect the difference between the high- and low-risk of each prognostic lncRNA, we conducted a principal component analysis of these prognostic factors. 2d-PCA (Fig. 8d) and 3d-PCA (Fig. 8e) analysis both show that the prognostic signature composed of these lncRNAs can distinguish precisely whether the patient belongs to the low- or high-risk group after dimensionality reduction of the data. Itonce again verifies the accuracy of the signature.

Fig. 8
figure8

Drawing the nomogram and principal component analysis. a The nomogram consisted of the risk score and multiple clinical features. b The ROC curve in the nomogram. c The correction curve in the nomogram. d PCA 2d and (e) PCA 3d

Discussion

Sarcoma is a malignant tumor derived from connective tissue or other non-epithelial tissues [15]. It occurs in a variety of tissues and organs, including osteosarcoma, leiomyoma, lymphosarcoma, and synovial sarcoma [16], among which osteosarcoma is most common in children and adolescents [17]. Due to the active cartilage and bone metabolism in children and adolescents, osteosarcoma develops rapidly and makes early metastasis [18]. Therefore, the standard of treatment is amputation or chemotherapy [18]. However, 20% of patients are prone to early metastasis at diagnosis [2], so it is necessary to explore the pathogenesis and metastasis mechanism. Tumor cells are extremely active in their internal energy and material metabolism due to their immortal proliferation [9]. Several studies have reported the molecular mechanisms about the specific metabolic process of osteosarcoma cells in the body, which proves the key role of the regulation of metabolic pathway in the process of osteosarcoma [9, 19, 20].

In recent years, with the rapid development of high-throughput technology, the mechanism of various diseases including cancer has been studied more and more deeply, especially in epigenetics, which is represented by lncRNA and circRNA [4, 5]. Sequencing technology identified five lncRNA types including sense, antisense, bidirectional, intergenic and intronic lncRNAs [21, 22]. These 5 lncRNAs work in different ways. Despite increasing lncRNAs have been reported in osteosarcoma, comparatively few reports reveal roles of lncRNAs in the metabolism of osteosarcoma. Our present study firstly screened out MRlncRNAs in osteosarcoma through comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. It provides guidance for further researches about the molecular mechanism of osteosarcoma metabolism.

In this study, we obtained nine metabolism-related lncRNAs in osteosarcoma, including lncRNA AC009779.2, lncRNA AL591895.1, lncRNA AC026271.3, lncRNA LPP-AS2, lncRNA LINC01857, lncRNA AP005264.1, lncRNA LINC02454, lncRNA AL133338.1 and lncRNA AC135178.5. In addition, we constructed a prognostic signature and the risk score based on the signature. Survival analysis indicates substantially different prognoses between the high- and low-risk groups. The multi-index ROC curve shows that the diagnostic power of the prognostic signature is preferable to clinical factors. At the same time, we also found some lncRNAs were closely related to clinical features such as age, sex and tumor metastasis. All prognostic factors can independently distinguish the prognostic survival rate of patients. GSEA analysis shows that the high- and low-risk groups are closely linked to cancer and multiple metabolic pathways. Finally, we constructed a nomogram to quantify clinical prognosis.

Some of these nine prognostic factors have been reported in other cancers, such as LPP-AS2. LPP-AS2 is thought to be associated with immune cells in soft tissue sarcoma [23]. Another study reported that LPP-AS2 regulates EGFR expression by sponging Mir-7-5p as a ceRNA and combination of the promoter region of LPP-AS2 with c-MYC contributes to the development of glioma [24]. LINC01857 has been reported to predict prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with fibrosis [25]. Another study showed its potential as a novel molecular marker for pancreatic cancer [26]. LINC01857 also can bind to promoters to regulate the transcription process of protein. For example, by interacting with CREBBP to promote the transcription of H3K27Ac and CREB1, LINC01857 promote the progression of breast cancer [27]. In addition, another function of LINC01857 is to combine with miRNAs to play a spongy effect. For example, LINC01857 sponges miR-1281 to promote TRIM65 expression and thus facilitates the development of glioma [28]. A recent study revealed that LINC01857 promotes the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells by regulating microRNA-200b [29]. LINC02454, as a long intergenic lncRNA, is mainly reported in papillary thyroid carcinoma [30, 31]. In addition, other lncRNAs in this study have not been reported in the relevant literature. It suggests that the prognostic signature we constructed is worth in-depth study. Although we integrated a variety of bioinformatics methods and statistical methods, and used various analyses to construct prognostic signatures and multiple verifications, several limitations remain. First, the samples come from a single database, which may be lack of representativeness. Second, no in vivo or in vitro studies were performed. Both the above deficiencies are also the main aspects of our further research.

Conclusion

We constructed a prognostic signature composed of lncRNAs for the metabolic process of osteosarcoma, which may provide guidance for clinical activities and assist clinical decision-making. In addition, it provided a reference for further study on the regulation of lncRNA on osteosarcoma metabolism.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files.

Abbreviations

MRlncRNA:

Metabolism-related lncRNA

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

PCA:

Principal component analysis

ROC:

Receiver operator characteristic

TD:

Tumor depth

TL:

Tumor length

TW:

Tumor width

TM:

Tumor multifocal

CREB1:

Cyclic AMP-responsive element-binding protein 1

CREBBP:

CREB-binding protein

References

  1. 1.

    Ritter J, Bielack SS. Osteosarcoma. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(Suppl 7):vii320–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rainusso N, Wang LL, Yustein JT. The adolescent and young adult with cancer. state of the art -- bone tumors. Curr Oncol Rep. 2013;15(4):296–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dean DC, Shen S, Hornicek FJ, Duan Z. From genomics to metabolomics emerging metastatic biomarkers in osteosarcoma. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018;37(4):719–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tano K, Akimitsu N. Long non-coding RNAs in cancer progression. Front Genet. 2012;3:219.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shi X, Sun M, Liu H, Yao Y, Song Y. Long non-coding RNAs a new frontier in the study of human diseases. Cancer Lett. 2013;339(2):159–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bhan A, Soleimani M, Mandal SS. Long Noncoding RNA and cancer a new paradigm. Cancer Res. 2017;77(15):3965–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li Z, Yu X, Shen J. Long non-coding RNAs emerging players in osteosarcoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(3):2811–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Taniguchi M, Fujiwara K, Nakai Y, Ozaki T, Koshikawa N, Toshio K, Kataba M, Oguni A, Matsuda H, Yoshida Y, et al. Inhibition of malignant phenotypes of human osteosarcoma cells by a gene silencer, a pyrrole-imidazole polyamide, which targets an E-box motif. FEBS Open Bio. 2014;4:328–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shen S, Yao T, Xu Y, Zhang D, Fan S, Ma J. CircECE1 activates energy metabolism in osteosarcoma by stabilizing c-Myc. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):151.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chen Y, Zhao B, Wang X. Tumor infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) as a biomarker for prognosis benefits in patients with osteosarcoma. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):1022.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Niu J, Yan T, Guo W, Wang W, Zhao Z, Ren T, Huang Y, Zhang H, Yu Y, Liang X. Identification of Potential Therapeutic Targets and Immune Cell Infiltration Characteristics in Osteosarcoma Using Bioinformatics Strategy. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Shen Y, Xu J, Pan X, Zhang Y, Weng Y, Zhou D, He S. LncRNA KCNQ1OT1 sponges miR-34c-5p to promote osteosarcoma growth via ALDOA enhanced aerobic glycolysis. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(4):278.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. (https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/). Accessed 3 Oct 2020.

  14. 14.

    Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(43):15545–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Blay J-Y, Ray-Coquard I. Sarcoma in 2016. Evolving biological understanding and treatment of sarcomas. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(2):78–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pappo AS, Dirksen U. Rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, and other round cell sarcomas. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(2):168–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Kager L, Tamamyan G, Bielack S. Novel insights and therapeutic interventions for pediatric osteosarcoma. Future Oncol. 2017;13(4):357–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bielack SS, Kempf-Bielack B, Delling G, Exner GU, Flege S, Helmke K, Kotz R, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Werner M, Winkelmann W, et al. Prognostic factors in high-grade osteosarcoma of the extremities or trunk an analysis of 1,702 patients treated on neoadjuvant cooperative osteosarcoma study group protocols. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(3):776–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nakajima K, Raz A. Autocrine motility factor and its receptor expression in musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Oncol. 2020;24:100318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yang C, Tian Y, Zhao F, Chen Z, Su P, Li Y, Qian A. Bone Microenvironment and Osteosarcoma Metastasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(19):6985.

  21. 21.

    Kopp F, Mendell JT. Functional classification and experimental dissection of long noncoding RNAs. Cell. 2018;172(3):393–407.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    St Laurent G, Wahlestedt C, Kapranov P. The landscape of long noncoding RNA classification. Trends Genet. 2015;31(5):239–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Huang R, Meng T, Chen R, Yan P, Zhang J, Hu P, Zhu X, Yin H, Song D, Huang Z. The construction and analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cell and ceRNA networks in recurrent soft tissue sarcoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2019;11(22):10116–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhang X, Niu W, Mu M, Hu S, Niu C. Long non-coding RNA LPP-AS2 promotes glioma tumorigenesis via miR-7-5p/EGFR/PI3K/AKT/c-MYC feedback loop. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):196.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ye J, Wu S, Pan S, Huang J, Ge L. Risk scoring based on expression of long non-coding RNAs can effectively predict survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with or without fibrosis. Oncol Rep. 2020;43(5):1451–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Giulietti M, Righetti A, Principato G, Piva F. LncRNA co-expression network analysis reveals novel biomarkers for pancreatic cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39(8):1016–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xiong Y, Gu Y, Wang F, Li L, Zhu M, Wang N, Mi H, Qiu X. LINC01857 as an oncogene regulates CREB1 activation by interacting with CREBBP in breast cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(8):14031–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hu G, Liu N, Wang H, Wang Y, Guo Z. LncRNA LINC01857 promotes growth, migration, and invasion of glioma by modulating miR-1281/TRIM65 axis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(12):22009–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chen GR, Sun W, Zheng K, Zhu W. LINC01857 promotes the development of gastric cancer by regulating microRNA-200b. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(7):3648–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cai W-Y, Chen X, Chen L-P, Li Q, Du X-J, Zhou Y-Y. Role of differentially expressed genes and long non-coding RNAs in papillary thyroid carcinoma diagnosis, progression, and prognosis. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119(10):8249–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Tan J, Liu L, Zuo Z, Song B, Cai T, Ding D, Lu Y, Ye X. Overexpression of novel long intergenic non-coding RNA LINC02454 is associated with a poor prognosis in papillary thyroid cancer. Oncol Rep. 2020;44(4):1489–501.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the TCGA database and GSEA database for free data use.

Funding

This work was no funding supported.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors read and approved the final manuscript. XC designed the study. ZY collected and processed the data. PL and WL conducted in the statistical analyses. XC prepared the manuscript. YL edited the manuscript and provided comments.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary Table 1. Fifteen Metabolism-related LncRNA were acquired precisely by Kaplan-Meier survival (P < 0.05) analysis and univariable Cox regression survival (P < 0.05) analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Ye, Z., Lou, P. et al. Comprehensive analysis of metabolism-related lncRNAs related to the progression and prognosis in osteosarcoma from TCGA. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02647-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Osteosarcoma
  • Metabolism-related lncRNA
  • Prognosis signature
  • GSEA