Skip to main content

Intraoperative blood loss as indicated by haemoglobin trend is a predictor for the development of postoperative spinal implant infection—a matched-pair analysis

Abstract

Background

With a reported rate of 0.7–20%, postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII) is one of the most common complications after spine surgery. While in arthroplasty both haematoma formation and perioperative blood loss have been identified as risk factors for developing periprosthetic joint infections and preoperative anaemia has been associated with increased complication rates, literature on the aetiology of PSII remains limited.

Methods

We performed a matched-pair analysis of perioperative haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct) levels in aseptic and septic spine revision surgeries. 317 patients were included, 94 of which were classified as septic according to previously defined criteria. Patients were matched according to age, body mass index, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and smoking habits. Descriptive summaries for septic and aseptic groups were analysed using Pearson chi-squared for categorical or Student t test for continuous variables.

Results

Fifty patients were matched and did not differ significantly in their reason for revision, mean length of hospital stay, blood transfusion, operating time, or number of levels operated on. While there was no significant difference in preoperative Hb or Hct levels, the mean difference between pre- and postoperative Hb was higher in the septic group (3.45 ± 1.25 vs. 2.82 ± 1.48 g/dL, p = 0.034).

Conclusions

We therefore show that the intraoperative Hb-trend is a predictor for the development of PSII independent of the amount of blood transfusions, operation time, number of spinal levels operated on and hospital length of stay, which is why strategies to reduce intraoperative blood loss in spine surgery need to be further studied.

Introduction

Recently, the number of spine surgeries performed worldwide has been steadily increasing [1, 2]. Even though improvements in surgical technique and postoperative care have been made, postoperative spinal implant infections (PSIIs) still occur in 0.7–20% of adult instrumented spine surgeries and are associated with higher patient morbidity and mortality, extended hospitalisation, worse long-term outcomes and increased health care costs [3, 4]. Currently, literature on the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of PSII remains limited in contrast to that on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs). However, identification of risk factors and their impact on the development of PSII is crucial in order to prevent infection.

Anaemia has been shown to be a common comorbidity in patients undergoing surgery and to be increasing with advancing age. Multiple studies have examined the effects of preoperative anaemia on the development of postoperative complications such as mortality, length of hospital stay and infection in orthopaedic surgery in general. In the field of arthroplasty, preoperative anaemia was found to increase complication rates including the development of PJI [5,6,7].

Furthermore, both haematoma formation and perioperative blood loss have been previously identified as risk factors for developing PJI [8, 9]. One of the emerging measures to decrease their incidence is the application of tranexamic acid (TXA), which is a synthetic lysine analogue binding to plasminogen and thereby inhibiting the formation of plasmin. It has been shown to both safely and effectively reduce perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in different fields of medicine including trauma and surgery and specifically in total joint arthroplasty [10,11,12,13,14].

While the effects of anaemia and blood loss have been extensively studied in arthroplasty, to our knowledge no previous studies have examined the association of perioperative anaemia and the development of PSII. Thus, we performed a strict matched-pair analysis in aseptic and septic spine revision surgeries.

Materials and methods

Patients

The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (EA2/128/19). We retrospectively included patients who underwent revision surgery after instrumented spine surgery at our institution between May 2015 and September 2020 with one or more microbiological and/or histopathological examinations of peri-implant tissue specimen and/or spinal implants submitted for sonication. Exclusion criteria were missing tissue and/or sonication samples.

Perioperative laboratory values for the index surgery, i.e. haemoglobin (Hb) and haematocrit (Hct), and clinical data including the number of peri- and intraoperative blood transfusions, body-mass-index (BMI) and comorbidities, i.e. diabetes, smoking habits, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, length of hospital stay, spinal levels operated on and operation time were retrieved from electronic medical reports and patient charts. Anaemia was defined as Hb < 13 g/dL for men and Hb < 12 g/dL for women. Hct cutoffs were defined as < 0.37 L/L for men and < 0.35 L/L for women.

Patient blood management

Intraoperative blood loss was monitored and treated according to a standardised protocol. Monitoring of blood loss included measurement of blood volume collected by suction as well as frequent blood gas analyses with measurement of Hb and Hct. Decisions regarding blood transfusion were individualised according to the guidelines by the German Medical Association, which recommend a restrictive transfusion strategy tolerating Hb levels of 7–8 g/dL in stable patients while in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease, a strict transfusion strategy with transfusion at Hb levels of 8 g/dL or less is suggested [15]. Thus, during the study period, in haemodynamically stable patients, a threshold of Hb ≤ 7 g/dL was maintained. Patients with a history of cardiovascular diseases were transfused at Hb ≤ 8 g/dL.

Definition of PSII

As previously described, patients were classified as septic if at least one of the following criteria was met [16]: (1) acute inflammation or peri-implant membrane types II or III as defined by Krenn et al. in histopathological examination of peri-implant tissue [17]; (2) positive tissue culture with detection of low-virulent microorganisms in at least two specimen, detection of low-virulent microorganisms in one specimen confirmed by the same microbial growth in sonicate fluid culture, or detection of high-virulent microorganisms in at least one specimen; or (3) positive sonication culture with detection of > 50 colony-forming units (CFU) of low virulent bacteria, < 50 CFU of low-virulent bacteria with the same microbial growth in peri-implant tissue culture or detection of high virulent bacteria of any amount. Low-virulent microorganisms included coagulase-negative Staphylococci, Propionibacteria, Bacillus spp., Fingeoldia magna and Enterococcus spp. Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp. and Enterobacteria were classified as high-virulent microorganisms.

Statistical analysis

Patients were matched according to age, BMI, diabetes, ASA score and smoking habits. Descriptive summaries for the septic and aseptic group were analysed using Pearson chi-squared for categorical or Student t test for continuous variables. For all tests, a p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. SPSS version 27 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

We identified 317 patients, 40 of which were excluded due to missing microbiological samples. In 94 patients, PSII was diagnosed using the criteria outlined. Fifty of these septic patients were matched with 50 aseptic patients. The mean age of the study group was 65 ± 21 years. Forty-four female patients were included (44%). The most common reasons for revision surgery were implant failure (53%) and adjacent segment degeneration (26%). Demographics as well as the clinical and laboratory data are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic, clinical and laboratory variables in both the septic and aseptic group. P values were calculated using Pearson chi-squared or Student’s t test. BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists

Between septic and aseptic groups, there were no differences in age, gender, BMI, number of patients with diabetes, smoking or ASA grade. The mean time interval between index and revision surgery was 28.0 ± 25.6 months in the aseptic group and 18.7 ± 25.7 months in the septic group (p = 0.012). The mean length of hospital stay for the index surgery was 12.5 ± 7.9 days in the aseptic group and 17.1 ± 19.2 days in the septic group (p = 0.104). In the aseptic group, 5.5 ± 3.5 spinal levels were operated on, in the septic group 5.7 ± 4.2 levels (p = 0.755). The operating time for the index surgery was 210.1 ± 123.0 minutes in the aseptic group and 171.3 ± 86.4 minutes in the septic group (p = 0.062). The mean amount of perioperatively transfused erythrocyte concentrates was 175.1 ± 309.4 mL in the aseptic and 220.0 ± 446.0 mL in the septic group (p = 0.561), intraoperatively 13.5 mL ± 66.0 mL was transfused in the aseptic and 64.7 ± 174.9 mL was transfused in the septic group (p = 0.057).

Table 2 shows all retrieved laboratory data. The mean preoperative Hb was 13.15 ± 1.53 g/dl in the aseptic group and 13.68 ± 1.82 g/dl in the septic (p = 0.079), and mean preoperative Hct was 0.39 ± 0.04 in the aseptic and 0.40 ± 0.05 L/L in the septic group (p = 0.392). As shown in Table 3, in the aseptic group, 15 patients (30%) showed reduced Hb preoperatively while in the septic group, eleven patients (22%) did (p = 0.247). Preoperative Hct was reduced in nine patients (18%) in the aseptic group with ten patients (20%) in the septic group showing reduced Hct (p = 0.500). The mean difference between pre- and postoperative Hb was 2.82 ± 1.48 g/dL in the aseptic group and 3.45 ± 1.25 g/dL in the septic (p = 0.034). The mean difference between pre- and postoperative Hct was 0.08 ± 0.04 L/L in the aseptic group and 0.10 ± 0.04 L/L in the septic group (p = 0.055).

Table 2 Analysis of perioperative Hb and Hct values of the index surgery. Δ indicates preoperative minus postoperative value. p values were calculated using Student’s t test. *Significant differences. Hb, haemoglobin; Hct, haematocrit; SD, standard deviation
Table 3 Total numbers and frequencies of lowered Hb and Hct values pre- and postoperatively. Low Hb was defined as < 13.0 g/dl in men and 12.0 g/dl in women, low Hct as < 0.37 L/L in men and 0.35 L/L in women. p values were calculated using Pearson chi-squared test. Hb, haemoglobin; Hct, haematocrit

Discussion

This is the first study investigating the correlation between perioperative anaemia or Hb- and Hct-trend and the occurrence of PSII. While the results of our matched-pair analysis do not show a higher risk of PSII in patients with preoperative anemia, we were able to identify a negative Hb-trend during surgery as a predictor of developing an implant-associated infection. This result was independent of the amount of blood transfusions received intra- or perioperatively, the number of spinal levels operated on, operation time and hospital length of stay, all three of which did not show significant differences between the septic and aseptic groups.

As the literature on the treatment and prevention of PSII remains limited, strategies are often adapted from what has been found in PJI. In the attempt to reduce rates of PJI, modifiable perioperative risk factors were identified by large database analyses. In 2015, it was shown that preoperative anaemia is the most important modifiable predictor of major complications after total joint arthroplasty, including PJI. This is even more relevant considering that the prevalence of anaemia was 20% in the study population [18]. Even though our results do not show a relationship between preoperative anaemia and the development of PSII, we also show a high prevalence of preoperative anaemia of 20% in the septic and 30% in the aseptic group. While it may not be a predictor of PSII, preoperative anaemia may still be the cause of other major complications, which remains to be investigated.

Due to the abovementioned relationship between preoperative anaemia and the development of PJI, more recently, blood conservation strategies have gained attention in the field of arthroplasty. Here, multiple studies have shown that reducing intraoperative blood loss by perioperative application of TXA reduces the risk for PJI after both primary and revision total joint arthroplasty [19, 20]. While its effectiveness in reducing blood loss and thereby transfusion rates has been proven by several studies, its exact role in reducing this risk of infection has yet to be studied in depth. Some of the proposed mechanisms of action include the reduction of transfusions needed and of haematoma formation and thereby reduction of growth medium for pathogens [19]. This is further supported by the fact that high rates of haematoma and blood transfusion are known risk factors for developing PJI [8, 9]. However, a study reporting lower infection rates after TXA application in cardiac surgery found this effect to be independent of blood loss and rather to be an effect on plasmin-mediated immune-modulating pathways [21]. Our results show that in spinal surgery, higher intraoperative blood loss—indicated by higher intraoperative loss of Hb—increases the risk of developing PSII. This supports the more recent notion in arthroplasty that reducing intraoperative blood loss reduces the risk for PJI. Therefore, in spine surgery, a reduction of intraoperative blood loss by measures such as the perioperative application of TXA seems to be reasonable as well, which is why prospective studies would certainly be of value in this regard.

Our study has several limitations. As it was conducted as a retrospective study, inherent limitations and bias were present and due to a rather small sample size, the statistical power was limited. However, to our knowledge, this still is the largest matched-pair analysis of PSII. Not all patients with suspected PSII could be included as in several cases histopathological and microbiological samples had not been collected intraoperatively. This might have caused selection bias as samples may have been collected preferentially in patients with macroscopical signs of infection. By performing a matched-pair analysis, we did however reduce this bias to a minimum. Furthermore, to date there is no accepted definition for the diagnosis of PSII, which is why the interpretation of microbiological results of peri-implant tissue cultures and sonication differs among institutions. However, in this study, strict criteria were used for defining septic revisions, which is why we are confident that our results are robust.

Conclusions

In conclusion, while our results do not confirm preoperative anaemia as a risk factor for the development of PSII, we were able to show that intraoperative Hb trend as an indicator of intraoperative blood loss is a predictor of an increased risk for the development of PSII independent of the amount of blood transfusions, operation time, number of spinal levels operated on and hospital length of stay. Therefore, strategies to reduce intraoperative blood loss should be further studied in order to prevent PSII as a major complication in instrumented spine surgery.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to patient privacy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

BMI:

Body mass index

CFU:

Colony-forming units

Hb:

Haemoglobin

Hct:

Haematocrit

PJI:

Periprosthetic joint infection

PSII:

Postoperative spinal implant infection

SD:

Standard deviation

TXA:

Tranexamic acid

References

  1. 1.

    Sivasubramaniam V, Patel HC, Ozdemir BA, Papadopoulos MC. Trends in hospital admissions and surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spine disease in England: a 15-year time-series study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009011. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pumberger M, Chiu YL, Ma Y, Girardi FP, Mazumdar M, Memtsoudis SG. National in-hospital morbidity and mortality trends after lumbar fusion surgery between 1998 and 2008. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(3):359–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    McClelland S 3rd, Takemoto RC, Lonner BS, Andres TM, Park JJ, Ricart-Hoffiz PA, et al. Analysis of postoperative thoracolumbar spine infections in a prospective randomized controlled trial using the centres for disease control surgical site infection criteria. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:14. https://doi.org/10.14444/3014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kasliwal MK, Tan LA, Traynelis VC. Infection with spinal instrumentation: review of pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4(Suppl 5):S392–403. https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.120783.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lu M, Sing DC, Kuo AC, Hansen EN. Preoperative anemia independently predicts 30-day complications after aseptic and septic revision total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(9s):S197–s201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Greenky M, Gandhi K, Pulido L, Restrepo C, Parvizi J. Preoperative anemia in total joint arthroplasty: is it associated with periprosthetic joint infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2695–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2435-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Viola J, Gomez MM, Restrepo C, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J. Preoperative anemia increases postoperative complications and mortality following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(5):846–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cheung EV, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Infection associated with hematoma formation after shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(6):1363–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0226-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Saleh K, Olson M, Resig S, Bershadsky B, Kuskowski M, Gioe T, et al. Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance program. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(3):506–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00153-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Levy JH, Koster A, Quinones QJ, Milling TJ, Key NS. Antifibrinolytic therapy and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology. 2018;128(3):657–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000001997.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kazi HA, Fountain JR, Thomas TG, Carroll FA. The effect of bolus administration of tranexamic acid in revision hip arthroplasty. Hip Int. 2012;22(6):615–20. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2012.10143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Noordin S, Waters TS, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP, Masri BA. Tranexamic acid reduces allogenic transfusion in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):541–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1441-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Park KJ, Couch CG, Edwards PK, Siegel ER, Mears SC, Barnes CL. Tranexamic acid reduces blood transfusions in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(12):2850–5.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Samujh C, Falls TD, Wessel R, Smith L, Malkani AL. Decreased blood transfusion following revision total knee arthroplasty using tranexamic acid. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(9 Suppl):182–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bundesärztekammer. Querschnitts-Leitlinien (BÄK) zur Therapie mit Blutkomponenten und Plasmaderivaten. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bürger J, Palmowski Y, Strube P, Perka C, Putzier M, Pumberger M. Low sensitivity of histopathological examination of peri-implant tissue samples in diagnosing postoperative spinal implant infection. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-b(7):899–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, et al. Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract. 2014;210(12):779–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liodakis E, Bergeron SG, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, Epure LM, Antoniou J. Perioperative complications and length of stay after revision total hip and knee arthroplasties: an analysis of the NSQIP database. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(11):1868–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hong GJ, Wilson LA, Liu J, Memtsoudis SG. Tranexamic acid administration is associated with a decreased odds of prosthetic joint infection following primary total hip and primary total knee arthroplasty: a national database analysis. J Arthroplast. 2021;36(3):1109–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.003.

  20. 20.

    Klement MR, Padua FG, Li WT, Detweiler M, Parvizi J. Tranexamic acid reduces the rate of periprosthetic joint infection after aseptic revision arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020;102(15):1344–50. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Draxler DF, Sashindranath M, Medcalf RL. Plasmin: a modulator of immune function. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2017;43(2):143–53. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1586227.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P., J.B., C.H. and F.S.; Methodology, M.P., F.S., J.B., Z.H., A.P. and E.K.; Validation, C.H., M.P., F.S., A.P. and E.K.; Formal Analysis, Z.H. and F.S.; Investigation, F.S., Z.H. and J.B.; Resources, C.H., M.P. and A.P.; Data Curation, Z.H., F.S. and J.B.; Writing – original draft preparation, F.S.; Writing – review & editing, C.H., F.S., M.P., E.K., A.P., J.B. and Z.H.; Visualisation, Z.H. and F.S.; Supervision, C.H., M.P., E.K. and A.P.; Project administration, M.P. and F.S. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friederike Schömig.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Committee of Charité – University Medicine Berlin (EA2/128/19). Patient consent was waived due to the study’s retrospective design.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schömig, F., Bürger, J., Hu, Z. et al. Intraoperative blood loss as indicated by haemoglobin trend is a predictor for the development of postoperative spinal implant infection—a matched-pair analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02537-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spine
  • Anemia
  • Infection
  • Diagnosis
  • Orthopaedic surgery