- Research article
- Open Access
Relationship between patellofemoral finite helical axis and femoral trans-epicondylar axis using a static magnetic resonance-based methodology
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 16, Article number: 212 (2021)
To manage patellofemoral joint disorders, a complete understanding of the in vivo patellofemoral kinematics is critical. However, as one of the parameters of joint kinematics, the location and orientation of the patellofemoral finite helical axis (FHA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to quantify the location and orientation of the patellar FHA, both in vivo and non-invasively at various flexion angles, and evaluate the relationship of the FHA and the trans-epicondylar axis (TEA).
The magnetic resonance (MR) images of 18 unilateral knees were collected at full extension, 30°, 60°, 90°, and maximum angle of knee flexion. Three-dimensional models of the knee joint at different flexion angles were created using the MR images, and then used to calculate the patellar tracking and FHA with a spline interpolation algorithm. By using a coordinate system based on the TEA, the FHA tracking was quantified. Six parameters concerning the location and orientation of the patellar FHA were analysed.
The average patellar FHA drew an L-shaped tracking on the midsagittal plane moving from the posteroinferior to the anterosuperior side of the TEA with knee flexion. Before 90° flexion, the patellar rotational radius decreased slightly, with an average value of 5.65 ± 1.09 cm. During 20° to 90° knee flexion, the average angle between the patellar FHA and the TEA was approximately 10° and that between the FHA and the coronal plane was maintained at about 0°, while that between the FHA and the level plane fluctuated between − 10° and 10°.
This study quantitatively reported the continuous location and direction of the patellar FHA during knee flexion. The patellar FHA was close to but not coincident with the femoral TEA both in location and orientation, and the patellar rotational radius decreased slightly with knee flexion. These findings could provide a clear direction for further studies on the difference in patellofemoral FHA among various types of patellofemoral disorders, and provide a foundation for the application of FHA in surgical evaluation, preoperative planning and prosthesis design, thereby assisting in the diagnosis and treatment of patellofemoral disorders.
Patellofemoral disorders have a high incidence rate and are challenging to manage [1, 2]. To explore the pathogenesis and improve the therapeutic efficacy of these disorders, it is crucial to fully understand the in vivo patellofemoral kinematics. Patellar tracking and the finite helical axis (FHA) are both parameters of patellofemoral kinematics. Patellar maltracking is a common concern in the management of patellofemoral disorders [3, 4]. However, high dependence on the coordinate system of patellar tracking leads to ambiguity in the consensus of the definition of normal tracking [5, 6], and therefore is not accurate enough when evaluating patellofemoral kinematics with patellar tracking.
Patellar FHA refers to the central axis of patellar rotation during knee flexion. Unlike patellar tracking, the calculation of FHA is independent of the coordinate system, which is embedded in the ‘moving body’. In addition, the FHA can be directly applied to analyse the moment of the muscles to which the biomechanics of joint is related . In the tibiofemoral joint, a close relationship between the FHA and the femoral trans-epicondylar axis (TEA) is demonstrated [7, 8]. In consideration for the coupled motion of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral articulations, a similar relationship between the patellar FHA and the TEA might exist. Iranpour et al.  stated that the patella moved in a circle around the trochlear axis almost parallel to the TEA. Coughlin et al.  showed that the patellar motion followed a nearly perfect circular arc in the midsagittal plane of the femur, with the origin of this arc at 9.6 mm anterior and 11.6 mm proximal to the femoral TEA.
However, there are no descriptions about the location and orientation of the continuous patellar FHA at various knee angles, which is typically displayed as a series of straight lines encompassed by arcuate patellar motion. Thus, the primary purpose of this study was to quantify the location and orientation of the patellar FHA and relate it to the femoral TEA with a non-invasive and in vivo methodology based on static magnetic resonance (MR), which can provide a new starting point in discovering the pathogenesis and improving the therapeutic effect of patellofemoral disorders.
Eighteen healthy subjects participated in this study (Table 1). The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University International Hospital. All subjects received an oral and written explanation of the study and signed the informed consent form. None of the subjects had a history of anterior knee pain, clinically diagnosed knee pathology, previous knee joint surgery, or contraindications to MR scanning.
The unilateral knee of each subject was scanned with the MR machine (Siemens/Verio 3.0T, Germany) at full extension and at 30°, 60°, 90°, and maximum angle of knee flexion. The subjects were positioned laterally. A thermoplastic knee fixator was used to keep the target knee at the required angle and immobilised during scanning. The following scanning parameters were used: fat-suppression T2-weighted image; slice increment = 0.999 mm; slice thickness = 1 mm; resolution = 512pxl × 512pxl; pixel size = 0.352 mm. The MR images of the knee’s sagittal section at five angles of knee flexion are shown in Fig. 1a.
Geometric reconstruction and register
Based on the MR images, three-dimensional (3D) models of the femur, patella, and tibia were developed with the medical image processing software Mimics (version 16.0 Materialise, Inc., Belgium) (Fig. 1b). The patella and tibia of each position were registered to the femur models by applying the inverse engineering software, Rapidform (version 2006, 3D Systems, Inc., Korea), and placing the femur models at various flexion angles in a fixed position (Fig. 1c). The knee flexion angles were recalculated with reconstructed models. The process of knee flexion was divided into three stages: early stage (0°–45°), middle stage (45°–90°), and late stage (> 90°).
Calculation of patellar tracking and FHA
Continuous patellar tracking was calculated with the knee models at five knee flexion angles using order-three spline algorithm. This calculation method was developed in our previous studies [11, 12], and its accuracy to reconstruct continuous patellar motion was verified with a motion capture system . Then, using the Chasles’ theorem, the FHA of the patellar motion was derived from the patellar tracking with 1° increments in the knee flexion angle; the motion process of the patellar FHA during knee flexion is shown in Additional file 1. In addition, the calculation formulas are shown in Additional file 2.
Configuration of coordinate system
A coordinate system based on the femur was then established (Fig. 2). First, the sulcus of the medial epicondyle (point M in Fig. 2) and the prominence of the lateral epicondyle (point L in Fig. 2) were selected to form the femoral TEA , defined as the x-axis, with the midpoint of the TEA as the origin (point O in Fig. 2) and the direction from medial to lateral as positive. Second, the y-axis was established as the line passing through the origin and perpendicular to the TEA and the femoral shaft axis, with the direction from posterior to anterior as positive. As shown in Fig. 2a, the femoral shaft axis was formed by two section centres of the femoral shaft, which were 0.7 and 0.8 times the TEA length away from the origin, respectively. Finally, the z-axis was perpendicular to the x-axis and y-axis through the origin, and the direction from distal to proximal was positive.
To evaluate the influence of the TEA determination on the subsequent calculation of patellar FHA parameters, the intra- and inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of these parameters were computed with the assistance of two clinical orthopaedic doctors who consistently determined the TEAs on the 18 knee MR images with an interval time of 2 weeks or more.
Parameters of patellar FHA
To analyse the characteristics of FHA tracking, five parameters of location and orientation were quantified: (1) the intersection position (IP) between the FHA and midsagittal plane (IPy = y coordinate of IP, IPz = z coordinate of IP); (2) patellar rotational radius (PRR; the distance between the patellar centroid and its FHA) ; (3) spatial angles between the FHA and femoral TEA (AF-T); (4) angles between the FHA and coronal plane (AF-C; set positive when the FHA was located from posteromedial to anterolateral) (Fig. 3a); and (5) angles between the FHA and level plane (AF-L; set positive when the FHA was located from superolateral to inferomedial) (Fig. 3b). All parameters of the FHA location were normalised with the TEA length.
The parameter curves of the patellar FHA with knee flexion are shown in Additional file 3, and the 3D tracking of the average patellar FHA is depicted in Fig. 4. Intra- and inter-rater ICCs of all aforementioned parameters of the FHA exceeded 0.93 (Table 2). The average length of femoral TEA was 7.85 ± 0.53 cm (mean ± standard deviation).
Tracking of patellar FHA
With the knee flexing, the patellar FHA moved forward after shifting upward from the posterosuperior position of the TEA. Specifically, the average IP moved backward and upward from the position of 0.1 behind and 0.5 below the TEA, reaching positions of 0.2 behind and 0.05 above the TEA at 10° knee flexion. Subsequently, it moved forward and upward of the TEA, reaching 0.25 right above the TEA at 60° flexion. During 60°–90° knee flexion, the average IP continued to move forward to the position of 0.1 in front of the TEA (Figs. 5a, b and 6). During 0°–90° knee flexion, the trajectory of the average IP was roughly L-shaped (Fig. 6).
In the first 20° of the early stage, the PRR fluctuated between 0.4 and 1.5, and varied in the range of 0.4–0.9 during 20°–45° flexion. In the middle stage, the PRR fluctuated within the range of 0.45–0.9. The average PRR increased during 0°–10° flexion and then gradually decreased (Fig. 5c). Regardless of the instantaneous change of PRR, the average PRR in the early and middle stages was 0.72 ± 0.14 times the TEA length (5.65 ± 1.09 cm).
Orientation of patellar FHA
In the first 20° of the early stage, the AF-T changed from 10°–80° to 0°–30°. During 20°–90° knee flexion, the AF-T of 16/18 subjects fluctuated between 0° and 20°, and the average AF-T was maintained at approximately 10° (Fig. 5d). In the late stage, AF-T tended to increase as the knee flexed along with the increase of individual discrepancy.
In the first 20° of the early stage, the individual differences of AF-C reached 80°, and the AF-C of 16/18 subjects changed from (− 30°)–20° to (− 10°)–10°. During 20°–90° knee flexion, the AF-C of every subject continued to fluctuate within the range of − 10°–10°. In the late stage, the patellar FHA of four subjects deviated from the coronal plane, and the others roughly maintained the previous direction. The average AF-C was less than 5° in the early and middle stages, and less than 2° during 20°–90° of knee flexion (Fig. 5e).
In the early stage, the AF-L of 17/18 subjects changed from (− 80°)–20° to 0°–20°, and the average AF-L changed from − 25° to 10° (Fig. 5f). In the middle stage, this angle gradually changed to the range of (− 20°)–0°, with an average AF-L changing to about − 10°, and the AF-L in 13/18 subjects equalled 0° at 50°–70° knee flexion. In the late stage, the individual differences of AF-L tended to be greater than that in the former stage.
Patellofemoral disorders are common and refractory . Considering that joint kinematics is the mechanistic link between musculoskeletal anatomy and joint function, a complete understanding of the physical patellofemoral dynamics is critical in clinical practice. FHA is an essential functional property of a joint . In the current study, we calculated the location and orientation of the continuous patellar FHA and found that it was close to, but not coincident with, the femoral TEA, and the PRR decreased slightly with knee flexion.
With the non-invasive, non-radiative and in vivo methodology based on static MR images used in this study, the patellar FHA was quantitatively demonstrated. Our previous study confirmed the reliability of static MR methodology in the establishment of a patellofemoral kinematics model . Moreover, the current study was an in vivo study that included all soft tissues, which is closer to the actual physiological state than the two cadaver studies involving patellar FHA that are available to date [9, 10]. All intra- and inter-rater ICCs of the FHA parameters were greater than 0.93 (Table 2), indicating excellent repeatability of the TEA determination and the establishment of its coordinate system, which has a minor impact on the description of the location and orientation of the FHA.
The range and standard deviation of the patellar FHA varied with knee flexion angles. In the early and late stage, the variation ranges of all six parameters were larger than those in the middle stage, with a larger standard deviation among subjects. This was because the patella had not been captured by the trochlear groove and was only regulated by the soft tissue before 30° flexion , while in the late stage, the fluctuation of the FHA was attributed to the transformation of the patella moving away from the circular pathway in deep flexion as it moved onto the bilateral femoral condyles . The variations in the FHA decreased in the middle stage, as a result of the femoral condyles enhancing patellar movement after it entered the trochlear groove . Clinically, trochlear dysplasia is one of the common causes of patellar instability [17, 18]. Some realignment surgeries, including sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty and plication of the medial retinaculum, have been performed for decades . However, the long-term outcome of these procedures is still debatable , which might be due to the insufficiency of restoring patellofemoral kinematics (including FHA) by surgery. Based on this hypothesis, patellofemoral motion models could be constructed for patients with patellar instability before an operation, and the computerised restoration of the appropriate patellar FHA would contribute to a precise surgical program. For example, accurate osteotomy depth and angle of the proximal trochlear groove could be calculated. Preoperative evaluation and virtual planning of patellofemoral kinematics would help to restore the normal motion of the patella and avoid post-operative patellar dislocation.
The patellar FHA presented L-shaped tracking in the midsagittal plane from the posteroinferior to the anterosuperior side of the TEA during knee flexion, differing in position and direction from the L-shaped tracking descripted in our previous study . For example, the direction of the L-shaped tracking in this study looked oblique relative to the femoral shaft, but in our other study was upright. Coughlin et al.  stated that the origin of the patellar tracking arc was 9.6 mm anterior and 11.6 mm proximal to the TEA, close to the ultimate position of the middle stage in our study, but did not adequately evaluate the movement of the patellar FHA. The FHA translation was likely caused by diminishing radius of the trochlear groove curvature . The decrease of this radius increased additional superior motion of the patella, which caused the FHA to shift anteriorly. This phenomenon is similar to the motion of tibiofemoral FHA previously reported by Sheehan et al. , who exemplified that an extra 1.1 mm of superior motion of the tibia during extension would result in a 25.0 mm posterior displacement of the tibiofemoral FHA.
In the early and middle stages, the PRR averaged 56.5 ± 10.9 mm, larger than that in previous studies (26.4–46.9 mm) [9, 10]. This is due to the different methods. For example, Coughlin et al.  chose the most prominent point on the dorsal ridge of the patella to fit the arc motion, differing from the patellar geometric centre selected in our study. From 20° to 30° flexion when the patella was captured by the trochlear groove, the average PRR showed a slight decrease, which was related to the slight diminishing radius of the trochlear groove . Thus, it is critical to restore the trochlear groove’s geometry when designing prostheses. The trochlear groove’s geometry could be optimised by applying the curvature radius of the trochlear groove in a physiological state and the normal PRR in the middle stage of flexion, which is expected to reduce anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty.
In this study, the orientation of the patellar FHA was predominantly in a mediolateral direction, with an average AF-T not exceeding 10° during most phases of knee flexion. However, at the initial stage of flexion, there were larger angles between the FHA and TEA, level plane, and coronal plane, which were likely due to the patella not following a circular path . From full extension, the patella shifted medially with the guidance of the medial retinaculum , so that its FHA seemed to be oblique relative to the TEA, with the FHA orientation from superomedial to inferolateral. That is, medial shift of the patella increased AF-T and AF-L. As the patellar shift slowed down, both AF-T and AF-L tended to decrease as well. Beyond 20° knee flexion, the patella shifted laterally in the trochlear groove [22, 23], causing a posterolateral-anteromedial orientation of the FHA. In the middle stage, AF-L tended to decrease again with the patellar shift slowing down. In the late stage, the AF-C transitioned to posterolateral-anteromedial orientation, possibly due to the slight medial shift of the patella .
To facilitate clinical application, we depicted the relationship between the FHA and the femoral TEA. Because the TEA is an anatomic marker which is easy to identify and is widely used clinically, and the present results showed that the patellar FHA was close to the TEA, it would be reliable to assess the FHA with the TEA as a reference. The insertion point of the medial and lateral retinaculum of the patellofemoral joint was near the sulcus of the medial epicondyle and the prominence of the lateral epicondyle, respectively , which explained why the FHA was close to the TEA. To date, the TEA has been regarded as an essential reference when installing the trochlear prosthesis in patellofemoral arthroplasty, and relatively successful clinical results have been achieved , which verifies the close relationship between the patellar FHA and TEA. Nevertheless, the FHA was nonoverlapping with the TEA, even if in the middle stage. This could be explained by the fact that the patella did not follow a complete circle that is influenced by the morphology of the trochlear groove, which resulted in the ever-changing FHA with knee flexion.
There were some limitations to this study. First, the patellar FHA was obtained under non-weight-bearing conditions without muscle loads, which might differ from that under weight-bearing conditions. Therefore, further studies about the effect of loading on the FHA are necessary. Second, the patellar motion calculated from finite static MR images was not completely congruent with the realistic one, but it was helpful for us to understand the spatial distribution of the patellar FHA; additionally, the accuracy of this method was confirmed in our previous study . Third, due to the limited space of the MR machine, the maximum knee flexion angles of half of the 18 subjects were less than 110°, which could be improved by further equipment updates.
In the current study, the location and direction of the continuous patellar FHA during knee flexion were quantitatively reported in detail. It was found that the average FHA drew L-shaped tracking on the midsagittal plane. The patellar FHA was close to, but not coincident with, the femoral TEA, both in location and orientation, and the patellar rotational radius decreased slightly with knee flexion. These findings could help us better understand the patellofemoral joint kinematics, and may provide directions for further studies on the differences in patellofemoral FHA among various types of patellofemoral disorders, thereby laying the foundation for the application of FHA in surgical evaluation, preoperative planning, and prosthesis design. All above is expected to promote the diagnosis and treatment of patellofemoral disorders.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
- AF-C :
Angles between patellar FHA and coronal plane
- AF-L :
Angles between patellar FHA and level plane
- AF-T :
Angles between patellar FHA and TEA
Finite helical axis
Intraclass correlation coefficient
Intersection position between FHA and midsagittal plane
- IPy :
Y coordinate of IP
- IPz :
Z coordinate of IP
Patellar rotational radius
Hott A, Brox JI, Pripp AH, Juel NG, Liavaag S. Predictors of pain, function, and change in patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48:351–8.
Putma S, Boureau F, Girar J, Migaud H, Pasquier G. Patellar complications after total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105:S43–51.
Esfandiarpour F, Lebrun CM, Dhillon S, Boulanger P. In-vivo patellar tracking in individuals with patellofemoral pain and healthy individuals. J Orthop Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23887.
Jin J, Jones E. Patellofemoral pain. JAMA. 2018;319:418.
Kedgley AE, McWalter EJ, Wilson DR. The effect of coordinate system variation on in vivo patellofemoral kinematic measures. Knee. 2015;22:88–94.
Yu Z, Yao J, Wang X, Xin X, Zhang K, Cai H, et al. Research methods and progress of patellofemoral joint kinematics: a review. J Healthc Eng. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9159267.
Sheehan FT. The finite helical axis of the knee joint (a non-invasive in vivo study using fast-PC MRI). J Biomech. 2007;40:1038–47.
Konda S, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Oda K, Nakajima M, Nakane K, et al. Comparison of finite helical axes of normal and anatomically designed prosthetic knees. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019;65:57–64.
Iranpour F, Merican AM, Baena FRY, Cobb JP, Amis AA. Patellofemoral joint kinematics: the circular path of the patella around the trochlear axis. J Orthop Res. 2010;28:589–94.
Coughlin KM, Incavo SJ, Churhill DL, Beynnon BD. Tibial axis and patellar position relative to the femoral epicondylar axis during squatting. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:1048–55.
Yao J, Yang B, Wang Y, Fan Y. Patella tracking calculation from patellofemoral positions at finite angles of knee flexion. Med Eng Phys. 2018;62:1–6.
Yao J, Yang B, Niu W, Zhou J, Wang Y, Gong H, et al. In vivo measurements of patellar tracking and finite helical axis using a static magnetic resonance based methodology. Med Eng Phys. 2014;36:1611–7.
Asano T, Akagi M, Nakamura T. The functional flexion-extension axis of the knee corresponds to the surgical epicondylar axis: in vivo analysis using a biplanar image-matching technique. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:1060–7.
Lankhorst NE, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, van Middelkoop M. Risk factors for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012;42:81–94.
van den Bogert AJ, Reinschmidt C, Lundberg A. Helical axes of skeletal knee joint motion during running. J Biomech. 2008;41:1632–8.
Greiwe RM, Saifi C, Ahmad C, Gardner TR. Anatomy and biomechanics of patellar instability. Oper Tech Sports Med. 2010;18:62–7.
Fucentese SF. Patellofemoral instability. Orthopade. 2018;47:77–86.
Kaiser P, Loth F, Attal R, Kummann M, Schuster P, Riechelmann F, et al. Static patella tilt and axial engagement in knee extension are mainly influenced by knee torsion, the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TTTG), and trochlear dysplasia but not by femoral or tibial torsion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:952–9.
Laidlaw MS, Feeley SM, Ruland JR, Diduch DR. Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Arthrosc Tech. 2018;7:e113–23.
Wang CJ, Chan YS, Chen HH, Wu ST. Factors affecting the outcome of distal realignment for patellofemoral disorders of the knee. Knee. 2005;12:195–200.
Du Z, Chen S, Yan M, Yue B, Zeng Y, Wang Y. Do size, shape, and alignment parameters of the femoral condyle affect the trochlear groove tracking? a morphometric study based on 3D-computed tomography models in Chinese people. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1374-3.
Amis AA, Senavongse W, Bull AMJ. Patellofemoral kinematics during knee flexion-extension: an in vitro study. J Orthop Res. 2006;24:2201–11.
Merican AM, Amis AA. Iliotibial band tension affects patellofemoral and tibiofemoral kinematics. J Biomech. 2009;42:1539–46.
Nha KW, Papannagari R, Gill TJ, Van de Velde SK, Freiberg AA, Rubash HE, et al. In vivo patellar tracking: clinical motions and patellofemoral indices. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:1067–74.
Remy F. Surgical technique in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(Suppl 1):S165–76.
We thank Dr. Xing Xin and Dr. Xingliang Wang for their assistance in the establishment of femoral trans-epicondylar axis.
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC 11502014, 11302248), Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS 2015QNRC001), Peking University International Hospital Research Fund (YN2019ZD05).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The protocol for the study project has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University International Hospital (Approval number: YJ2017-020). All subjects received an oral and written explanation of the study and signed the informed consent.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, Z., Cai, H., Yang, B. et al. Relationship between patellofemoral finite helical axis and femoral trans-epicondylar axis using a static magnetic resonance-based methodology. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 212 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02328-2
- Patellofemoral joint
- Finite helical axis
- Trans-epicondylar axis