- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
- Published:
Response to comments on: Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 16, Article number: 114 (2021)
Thanks very much for your interest in the article “Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures” [1]. We agree with Dr. Lu’s opinion that the description of the ideal starting point and Fig. 2B was not matched in our manuscript. In order to strength our statement, we provided a more rigorous Figure to match our opinion that the ideal starting point for tibial nailing of the SP approach is in the intersection of tibial midline and tibial plateau articular surface. As demonstrated by Bible et al. [2], twin peaks anteroposterior position (AP) images is safe for a starting point according to tibia-based referencing for proximal tibia radiographs. Too lateral a start can cause varus, in the tibia fractures, whereas too medial a starting point can create valgus [2]. Therefore, we recommend the ideal enter point as being “in the intersection of tibial midline and tibial plateau articular surface” at AP image and at the anterior edge of the tibial plateau on the lateral view. The ideal starting point in Fig. 2B we provided is slightly lower. We now correct Fig. 2B to provide a more accurate lateral starting point.
Replaced Figure 2B Starting point under fluoroscopic guidance

Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Lu Y, Wang G, Hu B, Ren C, Sun L, Wang Z, He C, Xue H, Li Z, Zhang K, et al. Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020;15(1):422.
Bible JE, Choxi AA, Dhulipala SC, Evans JM, Mir HR. Tibia-based referencing for standard proximal tibial radiographs during intramedullary nailing. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2013;42(11):E95–8.
Acknowledgements
None.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Y., Wang, G., Hu, B. et al. Response to comments on: Comparison of suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approaches of intramedullary nailing for distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Surg Res 16, 114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02263-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02263-2