Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Age over 65 years and high levels of C-reactive protein are associated with the risk of preoperative deep vein thrombosis following closed distal femur fractures: a prospective cohort study

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 15, Article number: 559 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In this study, we investigated the epidemiological characteristics and predictors of preoperative new-onset deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in adult patients with closed distal femur fractures (DFFs).

Methods

The study was designed as a prospective cohort trial at the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University. From October 2018 to June 2020, a total of 160 patients with closed DFFs were enrolled to assess the location and prognosis of preoperative DVT. The patients were followed up for 2 months. Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) was used to diagnose patients with DVT. The patients were divided into two groups (DVT group and non-DVT group). The DVT was then classified into proximal, distal, and mixed thromboses. The Mann-Whitney U test or t test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, univariate Chi-square analyses, and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the adjusted predictors of DVT.

Results

The overall incidence of preoperative DVTs was 52.5% (n = 84), which was diagnosed at a mean period of 3.1 days after injury. Among patients diagnosed with DVTs, 50.0% (n = 42) had distal thrombosis while 47.6% (n = 40) had mixed thrombosis. The calf muscle veins were the most common sites of DVTs (90.5%, n = 76). Of note, 45.2% (n = 38) of diagnosed DVTs were completely recanalized at a mean period of 12.0 days after the initial (first) diagnosis. Multivariate analysis revealed that age of ≥ 65 years of age (odds ratio [OR], 4.390; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.727–11.155; p = 0.002), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels exceeding 11 mg/L (OR 4.158; 95% CI 1.808–11.289; p = 0.001), platelet (PLT) levels over 217 × 109/L (OR, 2.55; 95% CI 1.07–6.07; p = 0.035), D-dimer levels over 1.0 mg/L (OR 3.496; 95% CI 1.483–8.237; p = 0.004), and an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of III-V (OR 2.753; 95% CI 1.216–6.729; p = 0.026) were the independent risk factors of preoperative DVT.

Conclusions

High levels of CRP, PLT, D-dimer, ASA, and ≥ 65 years of age increase the risk of preoperative DVTs in adult patients with closed DFFs. Thus, the prediction of preoperative DVTs can significantly be improved by identifying older patients over the age of 65, and establishing the biochemical cut-off values of CRP, PLT, ASA, and D-dimer.

Trial registration

No. 2018-026-1, 24 October 2018, prospectively registered.

This trial was registered prospectively on 24 October 2018 before the first participant was enrolled. This study protocol conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board. The ethics committee approved the study on the factors of prognosis for patients with fractures. Data used in this study were obtained from the patients who underwent orthopedic surgery between October 2018 and June 2020.

Background

Distal femur fractures (DFFs) are relatively uncommon but fatal. DFFs comprise approximately 8.7% and 0.8% of all femoral fractures and body fractures in Chinese adults, respectively [1]. Majority of DFFs cases in older patients is caused by low-energy injures such as fall-related traumas. Its annual mortality rate is 13.4% [2]. Geriatric DFFs are the second most prevalent fragility fractures after hip fractures [3, 4], and are accompanied by several complications [5, 6]. DFFs affects the articular surface and vascular or nerve injuries. Hence, DFF inevitably leads to knee dysfunction, traumatic arthritis, bone nonunion, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and other perioperative complications. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is difficult to treat given that is it associated with immune and inflammatory cells activation, which keeps the intravascular system in a hypercoagulability state, which leaves patients at a higher risk of developing DVT. The 1-month mortality of DVT was 4.6%, much higher as compared to that of the general population [7]. The development of VTE often leads to readmission of 1.2% of fracture patients [8].

Epidemiologic characteristics of DVT following fractures affect the success of prevention and treatment strategies. It is therefore important to determine factors that predict DVT to identify patients at risk of developing DVT. Several studies have investigated the incidence, predilection sites, and factors that predict DVT after hip fracture [9, 10], joint arthroplasty [11, 12], and ankle trauma [13, 14]. However, such studies are limited in terms of study design, insufficient preoperative DVT data, and short follow-up of postoperative prognosis. In addition, the epidemiological characteristics of preoperative DVTs after DFFs are not well understood. The majority of DVT cases typically starts from the calf veins and propagate proximally [15]. Prophylactic treatment of DVT is controversial.

This prospective study was designed for two main objectives: to summarize the epidemiological features of preoperative DVTs after closed DFFs with a 2-month follow-up; and to identify preoperative DVT-related predictors and find the optimal cut-off values of continuous variables.

Materials and methods

Study design

The present study, which was conducted from October 2018 to June 2020 at the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, is a prospective single-center study involving a total of 160 patients with closed DFFs. The study protocol was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (no. 2018-026-1). All participants in the study signed written informed consent before the study was conducted. The exclusion criteria were (i) < 18 years of age; (ii) old fractures (> 21 days from initial injury); (iii) open or pathological fractures; (iv) history of femur surgery and deep vein thrombosis (DVT); and (V) recent use of antithrombotic drugs (low molecular weight heparin and others), and patients with incomplete medical records. Patients with multiple closed fractures were enrolled to the study to investigate its effects on DVTs. Fig. 1 showed that 160 participants with closed DFFs were finally enrolled in the study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flow chart for the selection of study participants

Full size image

Definition and detection of DVT

Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) was used to diagnose DVT according to the Robinov group’s criteria [16]. The criteria for the diagnosis of DVT were non-compressed vein, lumen obstruction or filling defect, the lack of respiratory vibration above the knee vein segment, and inadequate flow augmentation to the calf. DUS was used to scan participants for bilateral lower-extremity DVTs after admission. Therapeutic or prophylactic thromboembolic agents were routinely administered based on the DUS result. Next, participants were reexamined by DUS every 3 days. DVTs were classified into three types: proximal (popliteal, femoral, and iliac veins), distal (calf muscle, fibular, and anterior/posterior tibial veins), and mixed DVT (both proximal and distal thrombosis).

Data acquisition and variables of interest

Four orthopedic surgeons who underwent a similar training recorded the data mentioned below. The surgeons closely observed the patients during morning ward rounds while reviewing their clinical data. The outcomes of DVT after admission were followed for 2 months. Complex variables of interest were divided into three aspects.

Demographic variables were age (years), gender, body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), living place (rural, urban), cigarette consumption, alcohol consumption, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and previous surgeries at any body part. BMI was split into four groups based on the Chinese reference criteria: underweight, < 18.5; normal, 18.5 to 23.9; overweight, 24 to 27.9; obese, and ≥ 28 kg/m2.

Fracture-related variables included fracture type according to AO/OTA classification system, concurrent fracture sites (single fracture and multiple fractures), fracture side (left or right), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA, I-II, and III-IV) score, and injury mechanisms. The injury mechanisms were, however, grouped into two categories: low-energy (fall from a standing height) and high-energy (traffic accidents, falling accidents from high places, human violence, and others).

Associated laboratory variables were obtained within 24 h of admission and conventionally divided into three, namely: above, below, and standard reference range. These biochemistry indices included hemoglobin (HGB), red blood cell (RBC), white blood cell (WBC), blood platelet (PLT), total serum protein (TP), albumin (ALB), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), C-reactive protein (CRP), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), fibrinogen (FIB), and D-dimer.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were presented as median, mean ± standard deviation (SD), and range. Data normality was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. A Mann-Whitney U test or Student’s t test was performed to compare continuous variables between SSI and non-SSI groups according to the homogeneity of variance test and normality test. For the continuous variables with statistical significance (p < 0.05), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to detect the optimum cut-off value, which was calculated by maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity in the ROC curve. Based on the cut-off value, continuous variables were converted into categorical variables before being subjected to logistic regression. The Pearson chi-square test was used to determine correlations between each categorical variable and the preoperative DVT risk. Predictors found to be significant (p < 0.05) in the single factor analysis were subjected to stepwise multiple logistic regression analyses (backward LR) to screen for the adjusted factors. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were determined to evaluate the correlation magnitude between factors and DVT risk. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to assess the fitness for the final model.

Results

Participant selection

Figure 1 shows the flow chart that represents the procedures used for screening the study participants. During the investigation, a total of 231 DFF patients were admitted to our institution. Among them, 45 patients were < 18 years of age; nineteen had pathological fractures (including bone or joint tumor, or soft tissue tumor); five had old fractures, while two patients had an incomplete clinical data. A total of 160 patients were finally enrolled in this study. The average age of the enrolled patients was 58.82 ± 16.01 years, while their average BMI was 26.18 ± 4.29 kg/m2. This cohort was made up of 59 males and 101 females, with 93 left-side and 67 right-side fractures.

Frequency of preoperative DVTs

Figure 2 shows the diagnostic time points of the preoperative DVTs after injuries. The overall preoperative DVT incidence was 52.5% (n = 84), which was diagnosed at 3.06 ± 1.91 days after injury. The administration of antithrombotic agents immediately after diagnosis led to complete DVT recanalization in 45.2% (n = 38) of the patients at 11.89 ± 5.80 days. Table 1 shows the locations of the preoperative DVTs. Among the DVT patients, 50.0% (n = 42) were distal thromboses, while 47.6% (n = 40) were mixed thromboses. Calf muscle veins were the most common sites for DVTs (90.5%, n = 76).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Diagnostic time points of preoperative DVTs after injuries

Full size image
Table 1 The incidence and thrombosis locations of preoperative DVTs
Full size table

Continuous variables and the optimum cut-off value

Table 2 shows comparisons among the fifteen continuous variables in the DVT groups. There were significant differences in age, PLT, ALT, AST, CRP, and D-dimer between the two groups. Table 3 shows the area under the curve and the optimum cut-off values for the six continuous variables. The optimum cut-off values for age, PLT, ALT, AST, CRP, and D-dimer were 65.5 years, 217.1 × 109/L, 21.5 U/L, 18.5 U/L, 11.2 mg/L, and 1.0 mg/L, respectively. Based on these cut-off values, we dichotomized the six variables for further analysis.

Table 2 Comparison of continuous variables in patients with and without preoperative DVTs
Full size table
Table 3 The ROC curve analysis of continuous variables with statistical significance
Full size table

Univariate analysis for the categorical variables

Table 4 shows the univariate analysis of the categorical variables of interest. Among the twenty-eight predictive variables, a total of eight factors (age, injury mechanisms, PLT, ALT, AST, CRP, D-dimer, and ASA score) were correlated with preoperative DVTs. Therefore, these eight factors were subjected to the multiple logistic regression analysis.

Table 4 Univariate analysis of categorical variables with interest
Full size table

Multiple logistic regression analysis

Table 5 shows the final variables of the multiple logistic regression analysis. It is shown that >65 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 4.390; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.727–11.155; p = 0.002), CRP > 11 mg/L (OR 4.158; 95% CI 1.808–11.289; p = 0.001), PLT > 217 × 109/L (OR 2.547; 95% CI 1.068–6.073; p = 0.035), D-dimer > 1.0 mg/L (OR 3.496; 95% CI 1.483–8.237; p = 0.004), and an ASA score of III-V (OR 2.753; 95% CI 1.216–6.729; p = 0.026) were the five independent risk factors for preoperative DVT. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed adequate fitness (χ2 = 12.837; p = 0.118).

Table 5 Multivariate analysis of factors associated with preoperative DVTs
Full size table

Discussion

This study revealed that preoperative DVT after DFFs was 52.5% in in-hospital follow-ups, which is consistent with previous findings in studies on lower extremity trauma of the lower extremity [17, 18]. However, studies have documented a lower overall DVT rate in other fracture sites when compared to our findings [8,9,10,11,12,13]. This could be attributed to the fact that our study cohort involved aged patients (58.82 ± 16.01 years). Moreover, asymptomatic patients with calf muscular vein thrombosis were also involved. After adjusting for confounding variables, age, ASA score, CRP, PLT, and D-dimer were shown to be independent risk factors for preoperative DVT.

Old age is an established risk factor for thrombosis as extensively studied by several pieces of orthopedic literature [10, 19]. Age > 40 years is a significant DVT predictor following fractures below the knee [20]. A retrospective study performed by Shibuya and colleagues on 75,664 ankle fracture cases showed that the age of the study participants in the DVT group (51.9 ± 21.4 years) was statistically higher when compared to that of the participants in the non-DVTs group (43.7 ± 20.6 years) [21]. Furthermore, Zhang et al. in their study on preoperative DVT after hip fracture (OR = 1.03, 71.51 ± 14.53 years) found that age was an independent risk factor [9]. In our study, the optimal cut-off value was found to be 65 years of age. Therefore, age > 65 years is an independent risk factor for preoperative DVT after closed DDF (OR = 4.39).

The optimum cut-off value for D-dimer was 1.0 mg/L, which was about twice that of the standard upper limit value (0.5 mg/L). A D-dimer value > 1.0 mg/L was correlated to a 3.50 times increased risk of preoperative DVT. Isolated D-dimer value tends to exhibit higher sensitivity, but often, the specificity is low in DVTs prediction. Moreover, D-dimer level is sensitive to age, infection, and cancer [22]. The combination of age with D-dimer as a critical value explicitly improved the predictive accuracy for DVT formation [23] and should be recommended. Compared to D-dimer, PLT volume is a common laboratory marker that is strongly correlated with coagulation. We established that patients with PLT > 217 × 109/L had a 2.55-fold risk of developing preoperative DVT. Due to bone fracture and blood loss, elevated amounts of PLTs were released from the bone marrow, secreting biologically active substances such as thromboxane A2 and thrombomodulin [24, 25].

CRP is a protein biomarker for inflammation. It accompanies the inflammatory process. In 2003, the American Heart Association suggested that CRP levels be used in screening healthy adults for increased risk of coronary heart disease (levels above 3 mg/L) and for the detection of unsuspected and severe non-vascular diseases (levels above 10 mg/L) [26]. We found that CRP > 11 mg/L enhanced the probability of preoperative DVT by 4.16 times (95% CI 1.808–11.289). Studies have documented that CRP levels are elevated in acute DVT [27, 28]. Elevated levels of highly sensitivity CRP were closely correlated with the occurrence of DVT in ankle fracture patients before and shortly after the operation [28]. Furthermore, CRP has been proven to have a positive association with D-dimer, which could be attributed to the ability of the D-dimer and other fibrin degradation products to upregulate interleukin-6 synthesis, which promotes CRP synthesis [29].

The ASA classification system is a routinely applied evaluation scale for in-patients physical status, anesthetic, and surgical tolerance at the time of admission. Studies have documented the indispensable effects of the ASA score in the risk prediction of mortality and hip fracture complications [30]. In this study, the ASA score of III-IV correlated with quite a high risk of preoperative DVT (OR = 2.753). This finding was in concordance with that of a nationwide study that revealed an ASA score of > 2 (OR = 1.770) as being a significant risk factor for DVT after colorectal surgery [31]. A few published reports have documented an apparent correlation between ASA score and DVT formation. This could be attributed to the fact that ASA scores were obtained from evaluating the comprehensive medical histories and the judgment of the medical staff, which is not, however, an objective biomarker.

This study has three key highlights: (i) it used the largest prospective cohort of closed DFFs patients diagnosed by DUS for DVTs; (ii) DVT location analysis and their prognosis over 2 months were performed; and (iii) ROC analysis was performed to identify a highly sensitive cut-off value for continuous variables, and CRP > 11 mg/L was found to be an uncommon independent protective factor for preoperative DVT after closed DFFs. However, this study had some limitations. One, it was a single-center study that might not represent prevalent populations and, two, some variables, such as hidden blood loss or the number of days between the fracture and the operation that potentially determine the development of preoperative DVTs were not included.

Conclusions

Elevated CRP, PLT, D-dimer, and ASA levels as well as age > 65 years were correlated with the increased risk of preoperative DVTs in adult patients with closed DFFs. Therefore, the prediction of preoperative DVTs can significantly be improved by identifying older patients over the age of 65 and, precisely establishing the biochemical cut-off values for CRP, PLT, ASA, and D-dimer.

Availability of data and materials

All the data will be available upon motivated request to the corresponding author of the present paper.

Abbreviations

DVT:

Deep vein thrombosis

BMI:

Body mass index

HGB:

Hemoglobin

RBC:

Red blood cell

WBC:

White blood cell

PLT:

Platelet

TP:

Total protein

ALB:

Albumin

ALT:

Alanine transaminase

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

CRP:

C-reactive protein

PT:

Prothrombin time

APTT:

Activated partial thromboplastin time

FIB:

Fibrinogen

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

CI:

Confidence interval

ASA:

The American Society of Anesthesiologists

References

  1. Zhang Y. Clinical epidemiology of orthopedic trauma. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Philip M, et al. Patient mortality in geriatric distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:111–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ng AC, et al. Trends in subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and distal femur fractures, 1984-2007. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23:1721–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nieves JW, et al. Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21:399–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd AD Jr, Wilber JH. Patterns and complications of femur fractures below the hip in patients over 65 years of age. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:167–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christodoulou A, et al. Supracondylar femoral fractures in elderly patients treated with the dynamic condylar screw and the retrograde intramedullary nail: a comparative study of the two methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:73–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Godat LN, et al. Can we ever stop worrying about venous thromboembolism after trauma ? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:475–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brill JB, et al. The rate of deep vein thrombosis doubles in trauma patients with hypercoagulable thromboelastography. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83:413–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang BF, et al. Deep vein thrombosis in bilateral lower extremities after hip fracture: a retrospective study of 463 patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:681–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang H, et al. Perioperative incidence and locations of deep vein thrombosis following specific isolated lower extremity fractures. Injury. 2018;49:1353–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sloan M, Sheth N, Lee GC. Is Obesity Associated with Increased Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty? A Large Database Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019;477:523–32.

  12. Barker T, et al. Is there a link between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and venous thromboembolic events after knee arthroplasty? A pilot study. J Orthop Traumatol. 2016;17:163–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meng H, et al. Incidence and risk factor for preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in isolated calcaneal fracture, a prospective cohort study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;S1268-7731(20):30116–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jupiter DC, et al. Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Foot and Ankle Trauma in the National Trauma Data Bank: An Update and Reanalysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58:1152–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iskander GA, et al. Incidence and propagation of infrageniculate deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients. J Trauma. 2006;61:695–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rabinov K, Paulin S. Roentgen diagnosis of venous thrombosis in the leg. Arch Surg. 1972;104:134–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Decker S, Weaver MJ. Deep venous thrombosis following different isolated lower extremity fractures: what is known about prevalences, locations, risk factors and prophylaxis? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013;39:591–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Geerts WH, et al. A prospective study of venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1601–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abelseth G, et al. Incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with fractures of the lower extremity distal to the hip. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:230–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goel DP, et al. Prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis in fractures below the knee: a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:388–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shibuya N, et al. Incidence of acute deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in foot and ankle trauma: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:63–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Douma RA, et al. Using an age-dependent D-dimer cut-off value increases the number of older patients in whom deep vein thrombosis can be safely excluded. Haematologica. 2012;97:1507–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schouten HJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f2492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leader A, Pereg D, Lishner M. Are platelet volume indices of clinical use? A multidisciplinary review. Ann Med. 2012;44:805–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Han JS, et al. Increased mean platelet volume and mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio in Korean patients with deep vein thrombosis. Platelets. 2013;24:590–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gremmel T, et al. Soluble p-selectin, D-dimer, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after acute deep vein thrombosis of the lower limb. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(Suppl):48S–55S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Du YQ, et al. Correlation of interleukin-18 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with perioperative deep vein thrombosis in patients with ankle fracture. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;54:282–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bakirci EM, et al. The role of the nonspecific inflammatory markers in determining the anatomic extent of venous thromboembolism. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2015;21:181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rumley A, et al. Effects of older age on fibrin D-dimer, C-reactive protein, and other hemostatic and inflammatory variables in men aged 60-79 years. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:982–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yin P, et al. Combination of red cell distribution width and American Society of Anesthesiologists score for hip fracture mortality prediction. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27:2077-7.

  31. Moghadamyeghaneh Z, et al. A nationwide analysis of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in colon and rectal surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:2169–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the support of the nursing staff from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: NSFC 81401789) and the Innovation Project for Postgraduates of Hebei Province Education Department (grant number: CXZZBS2020123).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Junzhe Zhang, Kuo Zhao and Junyong Li contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China

    Junzhe Zhang, Kuo Zhao, Junyong Li, Hongyu Meng, Yanbin Zhu & Yingze Zhang

  2. Key Laboratory of Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Orthopaedic Research Institution of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China

    Junzhe Zhang, Kuo Zhao, Junyong Li, Hongyu Meng, Yanbin Zhu & Yingze Zhang

  3. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, the Second Hospital of Shijiazhuang City, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, People’s Republic of China

    Junyong Li

Authors
  1. Junzhe Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuo Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Junyong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hongyu Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yanbin Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yingze Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yingze Zhang designed the study. Junzhe Zhang and Kuo Zhao searched relevant studies. Junyong Li and Hongyu Meng analyzed and interpreted the data. Yanbin Zhu and Junzhe Zhang wrote the manuscript and Yingze Zhang approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yingze Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was undertaken according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (No. 2018-026-1). All patients gave written informed consent for the use personal data for research aims.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from each patient to authorize the publication of their data.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Zhao, K., Li, J. et al. Age over 65 years and high levels of C-reactive protein are associated with the risk of preoperative deep vein thrombosis following closed distal femur fractures: a prospective cohort study. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 559 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02089-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02089-4

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X