Skip to main content

Risk factors for iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty using a collared femoral prosthesis

Abstract

Background

The relationship between collar design of a femoral component and iliopsoas impingement (IPI) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still underrecognized. The purpose of our study was to determine the possible risk factors for IPI related to the femoral component, when using a collared femoral prosthesis.

Methods

A total of 196 consecutive THA patients (206 hips) using a collared femoral prosthesis were reviewed retrospectively after exclusion of the factors related to acetabular component and femoral head. The patients were divided into +IPI and −IPI group according to the presence of IPI. Radiological evaluations were performed including femoral morphology, stem positioning, and collar protrusion length (CPL). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for IPI.

Results

At a minimum follow-up of 1 year, IPI was observed in 15 hips (7.3%). Dorr type C proximal femur was found in nine hips (60%) in the +IPI group and in 28 hips in the −IPI group (14.7%, p < 0.001). The mean stem anteversion in the +IPI group was significantly greater than that in the −IPI group (19.1° vs. 15.2°, p < 0.001), as well as the mean CPL (2.6 mm vs. − 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). The increased stem anteversion (OR = 1.745, p = 0.001) and CPL (OR = 13.889, p = 0.001) were potential risk factors for IPI.

Conclusions

The incidence of IPI after THA is higher than expected when using a collared femoral prosthesis. Among the factors related to collared femoral prosthesis, excessively increased stem anteversion and prominent collar protrusion are independent predictors for IPI. In addition, high risk of IPI should be carefully considered in Dorr type C bone, despite that femoral morphology is not a predictive factor.

Level of evidence

Level IV, clinical cohort study

Introduction

Iliopsoas impingement (IPI) is one of the underrecognized causes of hip pain after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA), which is characterized by persistent groin pain and physical disability [1, 2]. IPI after primary THA has considerable medical consequences and an incidence as high as 3.9–4.6% [3, 4]. Although the diagnosis of IPI remains a challenge, it is still meaningful to recognize the potential etiologies and thus to take proper precautions against it.

Among various factors contributing to IPI, the factors related to the acetabular component have been examined in previous studies, including cement extrusion [5], the penetrated screws for acetabular fixation [6] and a mal-positioned acetabular cup [7, 8], or the reinforcement ring [9]. Apart from the acetabular component, the liner and the femoral head have also been reported to lead to IPI [10, 11]. Very few studies have focused on the impingement secondary to the femoral prosthesis.

Even if the benefits of collars are unclear, they remain widely used, in several femoral stem designs, to be expected to improve immediate stability in THA [12]. Several national joint registries reported a significant trend in favor of collar use, showing collared stems had a statistically significant difference in risk of subsidence and peri-prosthetic fracture in comparison to collarless stems [13, 14]. As an underestimated factor, a collared femoral prosthesis has been regarded as an unusual cause of IPI in only two case reports [15, 16]. In these studies, the authors reported a limited number of patients with persistent groin pain, which was all caused by the impingement between the metal collar and the iliopsoas tendon as it overhung the calcar. To date, no previous studies have attempted to investigate relevant factors for IPI which are related to the femoral component, particularly when using a collared femoral prosthesis.

The primary purpose of our retrospective study was to determine the risk factors related to the femoral component that could potentially lead to IPI after primary THA using a collared femoral prosthesis, through radiological assessments. Furthermore, the secondary purpose was to investigate the possible mechanism of IPI and therefore to discuss effective preventive strategies.

Methods

Patient selection

Between September 2015 and December 2017, 267 consecutive hips in 257 patients, who underwent a THA using a collared femoral prosthesis and completed a minimum follow-up of 1 year, were retrospectively screened. The exclusion criteria included (1) malposition of the acetabular component after radiographic evaluations according to Lewinnek’s safe zone [17]; (2) severe hip dysplasia; (3) mental disorder including prolonged delirium and dementia, who were unable to precisely describe the symptoms; (4) low quality radiographs; (5) patients developing major complications within the follow-up period such as dislocation, infection, and loosening; and (6) incomplete data. The protocol was approved by the institutional review board at the hospital (MS20190728).

Among 267 hips, 238 hips who met the inclusion criteria were eligible to be included in the study (Fig. 1). Subsequently, the exclusion criteria ruled out 32 hips, and the remaining 206 hips in 196 patients were enrolled in the final cohort.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow chart of patient enrollment

Diagnosis of IPI

The patients were classified into the +IPI and −IPI group according to the presence of IPI symptoms. Patient meeting the following criteria were diagnosed as IPI: (1) persistent anterior groin pain after 3 months postoperatively; (2) anterior groin pain triggered by active hip flexion and active flexion against resistance with pain continuing from 30 to 70° flexion; (3) pain increased in active internal rotation and reduced in external rotation; and (4) pain improved after injection with lidocaine and steroid into the iliopsoas tendon sheath under the guidance of ultrasound [1, 18]. The diagnosis of IPI was documented by a senior surgeon during the follow-up.

Surgical technique

Uncemented THA was performed in all patients via a posterolateral approach, using a Pinnacle® acetabular cup system (Depuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) on the acetabular side and a Corail® femoral stem system with collar design (Depuy, Warsaw, IN, USA) on the femoral side. Accordingly, a 32 mm or 36 mm ceramic femoral head was used. Surgical efforts were made to achieve equal leg length, proper stem alignment, optimal hip offset, and axial and rotational stability of the prosthesis. We did not perform iliopsoas tendon release at level of the lesser trochanter. No major complications were identified intraoperatively. A standardized rehabilitation protocol was applied in collaboration with a physiotherapist. Physiotherapy began as soon as the anesthetic had resolved and was monitored during the whole process. Physiotherapy sessions initially emphasized bed transfers, movement from sitting to standing, and then processed to weight-bearing activities as tolerated within 24 h postoperatively, with the assistance of a walking aid. In addition, the patients were instructed in a home-based rehabilitation program emphasizing recovery of muscle strength and range of motion of the joints.

Radiographic evaluations

All patients were reviewed postoperatively at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, then followed by yearly reviews thereafter. The baseline characteristics were documented including age, gender, body mass index, and diagnoses.

All radiographs were taken by a senior radiologist in a standardized manner. Radiologic measurements were performed using three standard views of X-ray: pelvic anteroposterior (AP) view, AP view, and true lateral view of the operated femur. To minimize potential magnification errors, a metal coin of a known diameter was used as the reference on the AP view of the operated femur. We evaluated on these X-rays to exclude major complications such as prosthesis loosening, malposition of the acetabular component, and periprosthetic fracture.

The morphology of the proximal femur was categorized on the preoperative AP view of the femur as described by Dorr et al. [19]. We used the canal-to-calcar ratio (CCR) for classification. Femurs with CCR of 0–0.500 were categorized as Dorr type A, 0.501–0.750 as type B, and 0.751–1.000 as type C. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for intraobserver agreement was 91.4% (95% confidence interval, 88.5–94.3%), and ICC for interobserver agreement was 88.7% (95% confidence interval, 85.2–92.2%).

Stem alignment was evaluated on postoperative AP radiograph of the femur, according to the intersection angle between vertical axis of the stem and diaphyseal femoral axis. A positive value represents valgus alignment of the femoral stem, and vice versa. Furthermore, we introduced a variable termed collar protrusion length (CPL) to evaluate the severity of collar protrusion. On the postoperative AP radiograph, CPL was measured as the distance between the medial aspect of the metal collar and the medial aspect of the calcar (Fig. 2). A true CPL can be obtained after correcting the magnification error. In terms of CPL, a positive value represents an overhang of the collar, and a negative value represents that the collar stays within the calcar region.

Fig. 2
figure2

Measurement of collar protrusion length (CPL). Point A represents the medial aspect of the calcar and point B represents the medial aspect of the metal collar. d represents the diameter of coin measured on the X-ray. CPL was measured as the distance between the vertical line across points A and B, after correction for magnification. A positive CPL represents overhang of the collar over the calcar

We evaluated anteversion of the femoral stem on axial CT scans taken with the patient in a supine position, from the pelvis to distal femur, using a metal artifact removal method. The anteversion angle was measured as the angle between the stem-neck axis and an axis parallel to the posterior aspect of the femoral condyles, measured in the transverse plane (Fig. 3) [20].

Fig. 3
figure3

Measurement of stem anteversion on CT scan. The anteversion angle was measured as the angle between the stem-neck axis and an axis parallel to the posterior aspect of the femoral condyles. After measurement, the anteversion angle of the stem was 35°

The radiological measurements of stem alignment, CPL, and anteversion were performed by one experienced orthopedic surgeon in a blinded manner. These measurements were repeated twice on separate occasions, and the values were averaged.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois). Univariate analyses were performed to identify the potential risk factors for IPI between the two groups. In the univariate analyses, quantitative data were compared by Student’s t test, and categorical variables were compared by Pearson chi-square test, continuity correction, or Fisher’s exact test. Subsequently, the statistically significant variables were selected for inclusion in a multivariate logistic regression model, using a stepwise method. Odds ratio (OR) was used to describe proportionate risks of IPI. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Additionally, overall calibration of the regression model was tested using a Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test.

Results

Out of 206 hips, 15 hips (15 patients) had IPI, and the incidence was 7.3%. In terms of baseline data, no statistical differences were observed between the +IPI and −IPI groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics in the iliopsoas impingement (+IPI) and non-impingement (−IPI) group

The radiological variables of these 15 patients are listed in Additional file 1. In the +IPI group, 9 hips (60%) were identified with Dorr type C femur, whereas only 28 hips (14.7%) in the −IPI group (Table 2). A significant difference was observed between these two groups regarding proximal femoral morphology (χ2 = 14.36, p < 0.001).

Table 2 Radiological variables in the +IPI and −IPI group

We did not observe severe stem malalignment in all the patients (Table 2). A slightly varus and valgus alignment were acceptable (− 2 to 3°) with no statistical difference between the two groups (t = 1.857, p = 0.065).

The mean stem anteversion in the +IPI group was 19.1°, significantly greater than that in the −IPI group (15.2°, t = 4.003, p < 0.001) (Table 2). In the +IPI group, the anteversion angle > 30° was found in 3 hips (32°, 35°, 39°, respectively), which was absent in the −IPI group.

Similarly, a greater CPL was observed in the +IPI group (2.6 ± 2.3 mm) when compared to the −IPI group (− 0.5 ± 1.1 mm; t = 9.538, p < 0.001) (Table 2). In the +IPI group, collar protrusion was found in 13 hips (86.7%), whereas 40 hips (20.9%) in the −IPI group, showing a statistical difference between the two groups (p < 0.001).

The multivariate logistical regression determined increased stem anteversion (OR = 1.745, p = 0.001) and CPL (OR = 13.889, p = 0.001) as the risk factors for IPI (Table 3). Moreover, the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test indicated that the regression model offered a good fit for the data (p = 0.959). The number needed to treat (NNT) with Dorr type C and positive CPL to cause one IPI was 4.8 patients and 4.7 patients, respectively.

Table 3 Results of logistic regression model to predict iliopsoas impingement

Discussion

Most recently, there has been an increased trend towards the use of collared femoral stems in preference to collarless stems, due to reported superiority in lowering risks of subsidence and intraoperative fractures [21, 22]. The present study retrospectively revealed a high incidence of IPI (7.3%) in THA patients using a collared femoral prosthesis. After excluding factors related to the acetabular component and the femoral head, our study identified increased stem anteversion and CPL as the risk factors for IPI. Although femoral morphology was not a predictive factor, patients with Dorr type C bone appeared with higher risk of IPI after THA, when compared to those with Dorr types A and B.

The strength of the present study is that our design provided the most efficient scheme for rare factors with sufficient sample size because it only focused on the effect of the femoral component on IPI, after ruling out the effect of the acetabular component, the liner, and the femoral head. Only two case reports documented several cases of IPI when using a collared femoral prosthesis [15, 16]. They failed to provide convincible evidences regarding the associated effect of the collar on impingement due to their limited cases. To our knowledge, no previous studies have made such in-depth analyses of relevant factors for IPI. As a step towards exploring the definitive risk factors for IPI, we finally employed this cohort study to highlight the significance for clinical practice.

Successful THA depends to a great extent on ideal orientation of the acetabular and femoral components. Concerning the independent effect of the femoral component, high variability of femoral anteversion can be found after primary THA using a standard uncemented collarless stem, but it did not impact on the final clinical outcomes [23]. However, the conflicting results can be reached when using a collared femoral stem. The present study observed that increased anteversion of a collared femoral prosthesis resulted in high incidence of IPI. Positioning a collared femoral stem at an excessively increased anteversion may cause overhang of the collar beyond the edge of the calcar, and ultimately result in impingement on the distal segment of the iliopsoas tendon at level of the lesser trochanter. It could explain the reason why greater CPL was another risk factor for IPI because the increased CPL was frequently associated with increased stem anteversion. In agreement with our results, several previous studies reported a limited number of IPI cases associated with collar protrusion. Brew et al. reported an unusual case of iliopsoas tendonitis caused by protrusion of the collar on a femoral prosthesis [15]. Conversion of the stem to a collarless prosthesis finally led to immediate and complete relief of groin pain. In another case report by Lindner et al., IPI was found in a patient undergoing THA with a collared femoral stem due to a 13-mm overhang of the collar over the femoral calcar and was successfully treated by endoscopic iliopsoas tenotomy [16]. Modified strategies regarding hip implant selection and surgical techniques should be reconsidered in selected cases when using a collared femoral prosthesis, aiming to avoid this underestimated complication. As described below, use of collarless stem, appropriate level of the femoral neck cut, or avoiding excessive anteversion of a collared stem might be an effective and reliable treatment option for patients at high risk for IPI.

Uncemented femoral component, regardless of collared or uncollared, can provide primary stability and achieve favorable clinical outcomes in Dorr type C bone [24,25,26]. However, the relationship between IPI and proximal femoral morphology has not been well established. Our study did not observe femoral morphology as a predictor for IPI. Even though, we observed statistically higher incidence of IPI in Dorr type C bone (9/37, 24.3%) when compared to Dorr types A (3.6 %) and B (3.5 %). In contrast to Dorr types A and B femurs, Dorr type C femur commonly indicates a requirement of bigger size stem. Bonin et al. digitally analyzed CT scans of 204 healthy hips and found that according to native proximal femoral anatomy, a single collar size was not sufficient to ensure outstanding performance of collared stems [27]. Therefore, as an increase in stem size is inevitably associated with the increases in collar length, it can explain in our study why a majority of IPI were observed in Dorr type C femur.

The present study indicated that in addition to the acetabular component, we should place particular attention to the femoral component-related factors contributing to IPI when using a collared femoral prosthesis. To avoid IPI, the surgeons should take these risk factors into consideration. One important thing needed to be emphasized is the accurate orientation of the femoral component, particularly in Dorr type C femur. During THA, even if the acetabular component is placed in less anteversion, the femoral stem should not be regulated in excessively increased anteversion when using a collared femoral prosthesis, to obtain a proper combined anteversion [28], because the increased anteversion of the femoral stem might potentially lead to overhang of the collar and thereby cause impingement of the iliopsoas tendon on the collar during hip flexion. Furthermore, the surgeons should be aware of the impingement resulted from a low femoral neck cut, especially in osteoporotic patients. If the femoral neck is cut too low and close to the lesser trochanter, there is higher risk of impingement against the iliopsoas tendon near its insertion (Fig. 4). To obtain required leg length and offset, the solutions for these problems are high level of the femoral neck cut, using a shorter modular head or using a collarless stem [6].

Fig. 4
figure4

Intraoperative photo demonstrating potential impingement between the collar (white arrowhead) and iliopsoas tendon (black star) during stem implantation. Note that the metal collar was overhanging the calcar (white arrow) even if the stem had not been fully seated yet into the canal

There are certain limitations to our study. First, the retrospective scheme is the main limitation of our study. Randomized controlled trials are needed in the future to generate higher level of evidence. Second, although patients with acetabular component malposition were ruled out, the impingement in correct acetabular component position cannot be fully excluded. Moreover, not all of the impingement-related factors have been investigated yet including femoral head size [29]. We acknowledge the possibility of selection bias regarding the patient enrollment. Further studies are needed to investigate the combined factors related to both the acetabular and femoral components. Third, our study did not investigate clinical outcomes of the two groups, such as patient satisfaction and functional scores. Finally, IPI occasionally causes minor symptoms and resume most normal daily activities. There could also be the possibility that unrecognized groin pain was ignored by the family members and inexperienced surgeons at early stage of the study. Therefore, we still acknowledged a small number of missing patients as one of the weakness of our study.

Conclusion

The incidence of IPI after THA is higher than expected, especially when using a collared femoral prosthesis. Among the factors related to collared femoral prosthesis, excessively increased stem anteversion and prominent collar protrusion are independent predictors for IPI. In addition, high risk of IPI should be carefully considered in Dorr type C bone, despite that femoral morphology is not a predictive factor. Further detailed studies to confirm these will be required in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials are available from the department of Adult Reconstruction, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IPI:

Iliopsoas impingement

THA:

Total hip arthroplasty

CPL:

Collar protrusion length

AP:

Anteroposterior

CCR:

Canal-to-calcar ratio

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

OR:

Odds ratio

BMI:

Body mass index

FNF:

Femoral neck fracture

ONFH:

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head

DDH:

Developmental dysplasia of the hip

OA:

Osteoarthritis

SD:

Standard deviation

CI:

Confidence intervals

References

  1. 1.

    Chalmers BP, Sculco PK, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Iliopsoas impingement after primary total hip arthroplasty: operative and nonoperative treatment outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(7):557–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dora C, Houweling M, Koch P, Sierra RJ. Iliopsoas impingement after total hip replacement: the results of non-operative management, tenotomy or acetabular revision. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2007;89(8):1031–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Odri GA, Padiolleau GB, Gouin FT. Oversized cups as a major risk factor of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(4):753–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ueno T, Kabata T, Kajino Y, Inoue D, Ohmori T, Tsuchiya H. Risk factors and cup protrusion thresholds for symptomatic iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective case-control study. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(10):3288–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jasani V, Richards P, Wynn-Jones C. Pain related to the psoas muscle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2002;84(7):991–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Malik A, Maheshwari A, Dorr LD. Impingement with total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(8):1832–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bartelt RB, Sierra RJ. Recurrent hematomas within the iliopsoas muscle caused by impingement after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(4):665 e1-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Park KK, Tsai TY, Dimitriou D, Kwon YM. Three-dimensional in vivo difference between native acetabular version and acetabular component version influences iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2016;40(9):1807–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Schuh A, Schraml A, Zeiler G. impingement of the iliopsoas muscle after revision of a loosened acetabular cup with an acetabular reinforcement ring. Zentralbl Chir. 2003;128(3):209–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Baumgarten KM, McKenzie MJ. Iliopsoas tendon impingement after total hip arthroplasty with use of a large-diameter femoral head: A case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2012;2(2):e22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Browne JA, Polga DJ, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Failure of larger-diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty resulting from anterior iliopsoas impingement. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(6):978 e5-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Demey G, Fary C, Lustig S, Neyret P, si Selmi T. Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? A bilateral comparative cadaver study. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(8):1549–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lamb JN, Baetz J, Messer-Hannemann P, et al. Calcar collar is protective against early periprosthetic femoral fractures around cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry study with biomechanical validation. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(7):779–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2019 Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2019. www.aoanjrr.sahmri.com.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Brew CJ, Stockley I, Grainger AJ, Stone MH. Iliopsoas tendonitis caused by overhang of a collared femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(3):504 e17-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lindner D, Stake CE, El Bitar YF, Jackson TJ, Domb BG. Endoscopic iliopsoas tenotomy for iliopsoas impingement on a collared femoral prosthesis. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2(3):e205–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lachiewicz PF, Kauk JR. Anterior iliopsoas impingement and tendinitis after total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17(6):337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone. 1993;14(3):231–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Murphy SB, Simon SR, Kijewski PK, Wilkinson RH, Griscom NT. Femoral anteversion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69(8):1169–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Herndon CL, Nowell JA, Sarpong NO, Cooper HJ, Shah RP, Geller JA. Risk factors for periprosthetic femur fracture and influence of femoral fixation using the mini-anterolateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2020;35(3):774–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ries C, Boese CK, Dietrich F, Miehlke W, Heisel C. Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study. Int Orthop. 2019;43(2):307–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Muller M, Abdel MP, Wassilew GI, Duda G, Perka C. Do post-operative changes of neck-shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty? Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(12):1615–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    McLaughlin JR, Lee KR. Long-term results of uncemented total hip arthroplasty with the Taperloc femoral component in patients with Dorr type C proximal femoral morphology. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(5):595–600.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bonutti PM, Stroh AD, Issa K, Harwin SF, Patel DV, Mont MA. Proximally coated cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in Dorr type C bone. Orthopedics. 2014;37(4):e345–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Dalury DF, Kelley TC, Adams MJ. Modern proximally tapered uncemented stems can be safely used in Dorr type C femoral bone. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(6):1014–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bonin N, Gedouin JE, Pibarot V, et al. Proximal femoral anatomy and collared stems in hip arthroplasty: Is a single collar size sufficient? J Exp Orthop. 2017;4(1):32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(1):119–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Waddell BS, Koch C, Trivellas M, Burket JC, Wright T, Padgett D. Have large femoral heads reduced prosthetic impingement in total hip arthroplasty? Hip Int. 2019;29(1):83–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Funding

Not applicable

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design: Lei Zhang. Development of methodology: Xiurong Ke, Liben Zhao. Acquisition of data: Jiandi Qiu, Fanghui Wu. Analysis and interpretation of data: Shanxi Chen. Writing, review of the manuscript: Lei Zhang. Administrative, technical, or administrative support: Guojing Yang. Study supervision: Lei Zhang. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has been approved by The Third Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The approval number is MS20190728.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

The Baseline characteristics and radiographic variables of 15 patients in the iliopsoas impingement (+IPI) group.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, J., Ke, X., Chen, S. et al. Risk factors for iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty using a collared femoral prosthesis. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 267 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01787-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Iliopsoas impingement
  • Hip
  • Arthroplasty
  • Collared femoral prosthesis
  • Complication
  • Risk factor