Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Staphylococcus aureus biofilm organization modulated by YycFG two-component regulatory pathway

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research201914:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1055-z

  • Received: 29 October 2018
  • Accepted: 27 December 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infection accounts for more than 50% of the osteomyelitis cases. Currently, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains present an urgent medical problem. The YycFG two-component regulatory system (TCS) can allow bacteria to rapidly adapt to physical, chemical, and biological stresses. To define the role of YycFG in modulation virulence of S. aureus in osteomyelitis, we isolated clinical MRSA strains and compared these with ATCC29213 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA).

Methods

In the present study, 13 MRSA strains from chronic osteomyelitis tissues were isolated. The in-depth sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons of the samples was conducted. Bacterial growth was monitored, and biofilm biomass was determined by crystal violet microtiter assay. Furthermore, quantitative RT-PCR analysis was adopted to identify the expression of yycF/G/H and icaA/D in MRSA and MSSA strains. Analysis of variance with one-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis.

Results

The in-depth sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons of the clinical samples indicated a polymicrobial infection, with the phylum Firmicutes made up 13% of the microbial population. The MRSA strains showed an accelerated growth rate compared to the MSSA strains. Of note, MRSA biofilms showed an accumulation of an intercellular polysaccharides matrix and enhanced biomass upon microscopic examination. Furthermore, MRSA strains had a higher expression of the yycF/G/H and icaA/D genes and adhesion force.

Conclusions

These data suggested the roles of intercellular polysaccharide in S. aureus pathogenesis, indicating a possible association between YycFG pathways and MRSA strain virulence.

Keywords

  • Osteomyelitis
  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • Two-component regulatory system
  • MRSA
  • Biofilm

Introduction

Osteomyelitis is a progressive infection of the bone, resulting in destruction of bone tissue and bone necrosis, eventually developing into a chronic or persistent condition [1]. Chronic osteomyelitis is the prominent type of osteomyelitis with high recurrent rates, which may result from tenacious biofilms formed by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumonia, mycobacteria, and even fungi [2]. Particularly, S. aureus is the most commonly isolated pathogen in any type of osteomyelitis [3]. The low metabolic rates, adaptive stress responses, and decelerated rates of cell division of the deeply embedded bacteria, factors which contribute to resistance against antimicrobial agents, can be attributed to biofilms that act as diffusion barriers against those agents [4].

S. aureus, one of the most ubiquitous microorganisms in nature, accounts for more than 50% of the osteomyelitis cases [5]. The annual incidence of invasive bone and joint methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections accounts for 2.8 to 43% of all invasive MRSA infections which make up 1.6 to 29.7 cases per 100,000 osteomyelitis cases [6]. In addition to the mecA gene which induces resistance to almost all β-lactam antibiotics, it is the capacity of S. aureus to form multilayered biofilms that enables it to thrive in the host, often leading to chronic conditions [7].

The YycFG two-component regulatory system (TCS), specific to low G+C Gram-positive bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus mutans, mediates the synthesis of biofilms that allows bacteria to rapidly adapt to physical, chemical, and biological stresses. YycG is a sensor protein with histidine kinase activity, and YycF is a cognate response regulator that cooperates with the former. Mutations in the YycFG TCS have been associated with resistant and persistent infections [2, 8]. In B. subtilis, the genes yycFG originate from a part of large operon that comprises yycFGHIJ [9]. Besides, the yycH and yycI genes have been revealed to interact with yycG expression [10]. Biofilm organization is associated with the genes of ica locus including the icaABCD genes which encode the vital protein polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA) [11]. In particular, icaA as an operon for enzyme in PIA synthesis encoding N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase and icaD play an essential role for biofilm synthesis [12, 13]. In this study, we tracked the MRSA from chronic osteomyelitis cases and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains to investigate the potential roles of YycFG TCS components.

Methods

Ethics statement and clinical specimens

The study was approved by their Ethical Committee. The informed consent forms were signed prior to the study by the participants, all of whom were over 18 years old. Thirteen patients (5 females and 8 males; mean age 41.5 years; range 23–62 years) who were defined as chronic osteomyelitis were enrolled in this investigation (Additional file 1: Table S2). MRSA clinical isolates were obtained and identified from all these cases. Samples were resected from diseased tissues like dead bone and medullary pus according to a validated protocol designed to minimize cross contamination during the surgery [14]. Instrumental contact with the skin was avoided, and no specimens were taken from cutaneous ulcers or sinuses [15]. Part of the samples was used for microbial culture and histological identification, and the remaining were promptly stored in 25% glycerol at − 80 °C for further analysis. The antimicrobial susceptibility of those clinical MRSA isolates was identified using antibiotic twofold method at the Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital [16].

DNA extraction, sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses

Total DNA was extracted and purified. An amplicon library from clinical specimens was created by PCR amplification with unique barcoded primers specific to the 16S rRNA V3-V4 gene region, the 338F and 806R primer pair [17] (Additional file 1).

For bioinformatics analysis, quality control, error correction, and chimera removal were first performed. Briefly, the sequence reads with unknown bases (“N”) were discarded, and high-quality reads were selected for analysis. The sequences were first clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs), assigned as per the RDP classifier (trained by a customized version of the comprehensive Silva database) [18], using UCLUST with a 97% identity threshold [19]. An OTU network was generated and imported to UCLUST [20], and the relative abundance of each taxon in the chronic osteomyelitis specimens was calculated.

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. The MSSA ATCC29213 strain which was one of common sensitive reference strains [21] was provided by the Department of Laboratory Medicine (West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China) while the clinical MRSA strains were isolated from clinical specimens described above. Pure growth of single clones was achieved on conventional Baird-Parker (BP) agar [22], and the colonies were sequenced for strain identification (Additional file 1). S. aureus strains were cultured [23] (Additional file 1).

Isolation of RNA and cDNA reverse transcription for RT-PCR assays

Total RNA was extracted from cells harvested at mid-exponential phase [23] (Additional file 1). Any remaining DNA contamination was assessed by PCR amplification using 16sR gene primers (Additional file 1: Table S1) and agarose gel electrophoresis. The purity (A260/A280) and concentration of RNA were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific). The purified RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA with random hexamer primers or gene-specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S1) using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific).

Transcription analysis by quantitative RT-PCR

All primers used for RT-PCR were obtained commercially (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The conditions for real-time PCR are described in Additional file 1. Threshold cycle values (CT) were quantified, and the expression of each gene was normalized relative to that of 16sR gene used as an internal reference. Data were calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCT method [24].

Detection of bacterial growth and analysis of biofilm structure

S. aureus biofilm growth was established [23]. For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the biofilm samples were prepared and observed with a scanning electron microscope (Inspect Hillsboro, Additional file 1). For biomass and structural assessment, the biofilms were labeled with SYTO 9 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and observed under a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, FV1000; Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at × 40 magnification. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the imaged biofilms was analyzed, and their biomass was quantified using Imaris 7.0 software (Bitplane, Zurich, Switzerland). The procedure was repeated three times for five randomly selected fields of each specimen. Bacterial adhesion force in the biofilms was assessed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Briefly, the S. aureus biofilms were rinsed twice with PBS buffer and dried in air at room temperature, and the AFM procedures were performed using an SPM-9500J2 (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) in the contact mode. The bacterial adhesion forces were calculated [25], and for each measurement, the probe was positioned over the biofilm surface and ten force cycles were recorded for five randomly selected bacterial cells [26].

Crystal violet microtiter assay for determining biofilm biomass

The biomass of S. aureus biofilms was determined by crystal violet (CV) assay as previously described [27]. Biofilms obtained after 24 h were air dried and stained with 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet for 15 min at room temperature. The bound dye from the stained biofilm cells was solubilized with 1-μl destaining solution (ethanol/acetone = 8:2). The destaining solution was then transferred into a new plate, and biofilm formation was quantified by measuring the OD of the solution at 550 nm. The biomass of S. aureus biofilms included three biological replicates, and the procedure was technically replicated in three times.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine whether the data were normally distributed, and Bartlett’s test was used to assess the homogeneity of variances. For parametric testing, one-way ANOVA was used to detect the significant effects of variables followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test to compare the means of each group. The differences of the means of data were considered significant if the p values were < 0.05.

Results

Phylogenetic distribution of bacteria and species diversity

After obtaining high-quality sequences, the number of reads for further analysis of each sample ranged from 1861 to 11,810 with an average length of 450 bp. The sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons revealed several bacterial species, encompassing five phyla and eight genera, indicating a polymicrobial infection in chronic osteomyelitis specimens. The phylum Bacteroidia constituted the major part (around 82%) of the pathogenic flora while the phylum Firmicutes made up 13% (Fig. 1). Taken together, the chronic osteomyelitis-associated microbiota profile indicated a polymicrobial infection that was not restricted to the Staphylococcus aureus belonging to the phylum Firmicutes.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Relative abundance of phyla in the chronic osteomyelitis specimens. Taxtree for percentages of all samples. Differential microbiota compositions. The size of the column represents the relative abundance of the classification. Total DNA was extracted from clinical specimens. An amplicon library was created by PCR amplification with unique barcoded primers specific to the 16S rRNA V3-V4 gene region which contained the 30-mer 5′-end adapter sequence required for Illumina Hiseq System sequencing

Altered morphology of MRSA on bacterial growth and biofilm formation

Clinical MRSA strains were identified by Gram’s staining (Fig. 2a) and 16S rRNA sequencing (Additional file 1). The growth curves of MSSA and MRSA strains were compared in three independent experiments. The entry into log phase was significantly delayed by 4 h in the MSSA ATCC29213 strain compared to the MRSA strains (Fig. 2b). MSSA biofilm formation was also decreased by 50% compared to MRSA (Fig. 2c, d). The altered phenotype of the MSSA strain is consistent with their easily disrupted biofilms and decreased EPS matrix accumulation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Initial comparison of MSSA and MRSA on the growth and morphology of S. aureus. a Gram’s stain for initial MRSA identification. b Comparison of MSSA and MRSA on bacterial growth. S. aureus ATCC29213 and MARSA were grown in TSB medium at 37 °C. c S. aureus 24-h biofilms grown in TSB broth containing 0.5% glucose. Biomass was quantified by crystal violet staining and the MRSA strains form more robust biofilm. d For crystal violet microtiter assay for determining biofilm biomass. Data represent ten biological replicates and are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (*p < 0.05, n = 10)

MRSA strains show elevated expression of virulence-associated genes and EPS matrix accumulation in biofilms

MRSA strains showed elevated expression of virulence-associated genes which affected their growth rates and biofilm formation. Comparative quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that expression of the icaA, icaD, yycF, yycG, and yycH transcripts were upregulated in the MRSA strains by 2.2-, 1.8-, 3.2-, 5.1-, and 4.5-folds, respectively, compared to the MSSA strain (Fig. 3a). The morphology of the S. aureus biofilms was analyzed using SEM (Fig. 3b). After the introduction of 0.5% glucose, an EPS matrix was seen in the MRSA biofilms surrounding clusters of cells, whereas the biofilms of the MSSA strain showed uneven EPS matrix interspersed with “blank” areas. Taken together, the expression of virulence-associated and biofilm formation genes was altered in the MRSA strains.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

The expression of virulent-associated genes and phenotypic characteristics of S. aureus. a Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed the genes transcripts in ATCC29213 and MRSA. Experiments were performed in triplicate and presented as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 10; *p < 0.05). b Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation of the architecture of S. aureus 24-h biofilms. Clusters of bacterial cells were surrounded by the EPS matrix in MRSA (red arrows). The ATCC29213 cells seemed to be devoid of EPS matrix in the biofilms

MRSA enhanced biofilm organization and adhesion ability

Three-dimensional views obtained by CLSM showed significantly greater bacterial biomass of the MRSA biofilms compared to that of the MSSA strain (Fig. 4a). Furthermore, from the amount of biomass that was obtained, it was highly likely that the biomass volume was inhibited in the MSSA strain (120 ± 8.2 μm3/μm2; Fig. 4b). With elevated bacterial biomass, the adhesion force between the bacterial cells and the AFM probe was considerable in MRSA biofilms (9.2 ± 0.11 nN; Fig. 4c) while the same was significantly decreased in the MSSA biofilms (1.76 ± 0.28 nN; Fig. 4c).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Laser confocal microscopy of EPS matrix in the biofilm architecture. a Labeling of the biofilms in the ATCC29213 and MRSA strains in S. aureus 24-h biofilms. Green, total bacteria (SYTO 9); scale bars, 100 μm. b Quantitative data of bacterial biomass from the biofilms reconstruction (*p < 0.05, n = 10). c The values of adhesion force of S. aureus 24-h biofilms which were obtained from atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments (*p < 0.05, n = 10)

Discussion

Sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons indicated that the infection in chronic osteomyelitis specimens was polymicrobial in nature. The bacterial species detected included five phyla (Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria). Polymicrobial infections have been observed in previous studies of chronic osteomyelitis of the jaw [18, 28]. In the present study, the phylum Bacteroidia made up the major part (82.69%) of the diseased tissues’ microbiota. In terms of microbial diversity, the genus Porphyromonas was the most abundant (Fig. 1a). The second most abundant phylum in the chronic osteomyelitis specimens was Firmicutes which made up 13% of the microbiota. It has been speculated that the deeper osteomyelitis tissues adapt to the anaerobic environment. This and the polymicrobial nature of the infection make it difficult to identify most of the causative microbes with routine culture-dependent methods [29], underscoring the role of genetic sequencing. Moreover, further analysis of the phylogenetic distribution of bacteria in MSSA osteomyelitis specimens would shed light on the interaction between MRSA and the microbiota in chronic osteomyelitis.

The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains on the other hand have been shown to be crucial in such recalcitrant and persistent infections [2]. Therefore, the potential mechanism involved in the pathogenicity of MRSA deserves further investigation. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have investigated the genetic pathways involved in the drug resistance of MRSA strains [30, 31]. However, there is no evidence for any direct interaction between these pathways and the biofilm formation seen in a methicillin-resistant clinical isolate. Among drug-resistant regulatory networks, the two-component signal transduction systems (TCS) are essential for bacterial adaptation, survival, and virulence which contribute to antibiotic resistance [32, 33]. Typically, TCS signal transduction comprises of a membrane-associated histidine kinase and a cytoplasmic response regulator. The histidine kinase recognizes an environmental change, e.g., in pH, osmolarity, or oxidation reduction, and auto-phosphorylates at a conserved histidine residue. Following the transfer of the phosphorylated moiety to the response regulator, the latter can control transcription of target genes. The metabolic processes controlled by TCS include quorum sensing, sporulation, and bacteriocin production in a wide variety of bacteria [34, 35].

In the present study, MRSA isolates from chronic osteomyelitis specimens revealed upregulated levels of yycF, yycG, and yycH genes when compared to the MSSA ATCC29213 strain (Fig. 3a), underscoring their role in MRSA pathogenicity and antibiotic resistance. It was revealed that mutants of YycHI are selected for leading to reduced WalRK activation which was associated with activation and impaired cell wall turnover [30]. In S. aureus, WalR is a critical transcriptional regulator which has been shown to influence the expression of genes associated with amino acid biosynthesis, central metabolism, and virulence [36, 37]. In the present study, the MSSA strain showed altered growth pattern with a significantly delayed (4 h) entry into the log phase compared to the MRSA strains (Fig. 2b), suggesting that YycFG affects growth rates.

Polysaccharide intercellular adhesion (PIA), a β-1, 6-linked N-acetyl-glucosamine homopolymer that triggers the accumulation of bacterial biofilm, is crucial to the cellular adhesion and pathogenesis of S. aureus [23]. PIA is synthesized by enzymes encoded by the ica locus [38], and the MRSA strains in this study show an upregulation of icaA transcripts (Fig. 3a), indicating an important role of intercellular polysaccharide in S. aureus pathogenesis [39]. We found that the biofilm formation decreased by 65% in MSSA compared with MRSA (Fig. 2c, d). This phenotype fits with the easily disrupted biofilm and decreased intercellular polysaccharide matrix accumulation seen in MSSA.

Regarding the association between intercellular polysaccharides layer and biofilm aggregation of S. aureus isolates, the AFM is a useful tool to observe bacterial biofilm formation [40]. With accumulated intercellular polysaccharides matrix and enhanced biofilm biomass (Fig. 4a, b), the bacterial adhesion force in MRSA was significantly higher (9.2 ± 0.11 nN) compared to that of MSSA (1.76 ± 0.28 nN, Fig. 4c). Apart from cell adhesion, PIAs are also essential for shaping S. aureus biofilm architecture [23]. After the introduction of 0.5% glucose in the culture media, the MRSA cells were covered with reticular intercellular polysaccharides matrix while MSSA biofilms were devoid of these intercellular polysaccharides and had “blank” areas (Fig. 3b). Further studies are needed to validate our findings and elucidate the role of the YycH pathway in MRSA virulence. Within the limitations of this study, the potential mechanisms of the interactions between biofilm organization and expression of YycFG two-component systems should be considered in further investigations. On the other hand, the current study includes the use of single MSSA strain and lacking use of deletion mutants to study the roles of YycFG two-component pathway involved in biofilm formation and bacterial virulence. Therefore, additional information about the in vitro and in vivo studies needs to be explored in the future.

Conclusion

The 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing confirmed the polymicrobial nature of chronic osteomyelitis, and the MRSA strains from clinical specimens were successfully isolated and identified. Increased expressions of yycF, yycG, and yycH transcripts were observed in MRSA isolates which affected the bacterial growth rates. Furthermore, MRSA biofilms showed an accumulation of intercellular polysaccharides matrix and enhanced biofilm biomass. The MRSA isolate also showed an enhanced expression of the icaA gene, suggesting the role of intercellular polysaccharide in S. aureus pathogenesis. These findings indicate potential associations between the YycFG pathway and the virulence of clinical MRSA strains and provide a new therapeutic perspective for MRSA-induced chronic osteomyelitis targeting this pathway and disrupting the intercellular polysaccharides matrix.

Abbreviations

AFM: 

Atomic force microscopy

BP: 

Baird-Parker

CLSM: 

Confocal laser scanning microscope

CV: 

Crystal violet

EPS: 

Extracellular polymeric substances

MRSA: 

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MSSA: 

Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

OTUs: 

Operational taxonomic units

PIA: 

Polysaccharide intercellular adhesion

S. aureus

Staphylococcus aureus

SEM: 

Scanning electron microscopy

TCS: 

Two-component regulatory system

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to give their special thanks to Huiqi Xie for her skilled technical assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by Sichuan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2018SZ0125) and The Science and Technology Project of the Health Planning Committee of Sichuan (No. 18PJ464).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

Authors’ contributions

Setting up the research was done by LL, HFG, and ZH. The experiment was majorly done by WSZ and LL. The statistical analysis was done by WSZ and LL. The manuscript preparation was done by WSZ. Supervising was done by ZH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The West China Hospital of Sichuan University Biomedical Research Ethics Committee approved the human protocol for this investigation (permission number 200814). The consent to participate was obtained from the participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital , Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Alley, Wuhou District, Chengdu City, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
(2)
State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Department of Preventive Dentistry, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, No. 14 Renmin South Road, Wuhou District, Chengdu City, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
(3)
West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Brady RA, Leid JG, Costerton JW, Shirtliff ME. Osteomyelitis: clinical overview and mechanisms of infection persistence. Clin Micro Newsletter. 2006;28(9):65–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck-Broichsitter BE, Smeets R, Heiland M. Current concepts in pathogenesis of acute and chronic osteomyelitis. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015;28(3):240–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chihara S, Segreti J. Osteomyelitis. Dis Mon. 2010;56(1):5–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Roberts ME, Stewart PS. Modeling antibiotic tolerance in biofilms by accounting for nutrient limitation. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(1):48–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Mruk AL, Record KE. Antimicrobial options in the treatment of adult staphylococcal bone and joint infections in an era of drug shortages. Orthopedics. 2012;35(5):401–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Vardakas KZ, Kontopidis I, Gkegkes ID, Rafailidis PI, Falagas ME. Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with bone and joint infections due to community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(6):711–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Ando E, Monden K, Mitsuhata R, Kariyama R, Kumon H. Biofilm formation among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from patients with urinary tract infection. Acta Med Okayama. 2004;58(4):207–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gómez-Mejia A, Gámez G, Hammerschmidt S. Streptococcus pneumoniae two-component regulatory systems: the interplay of the pneumococcus with its environment. Int J Med Microbiol. 2018;308(6):722–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubrac S, Bisicchia P, Devine KM, Msadek T. A matter of life and death: cell wall homeostasis and the WalKR (YycGF) essential signal transduction pathway. Mol Microbiol. 2008;70(6):1307–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Szurmant H, Mohan MA, Imus PM, Hoch JA. YycH and YycI interact to regulate the essential YycFG two-component system in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(8):3280–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid JG, Powers ME, Shirtliff ME. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence. 2011;2(5):445–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Cramton SE, Ulrich M, Götz F, Döring G. Anaerobic conditions induce expression of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 2001;69(6):4079–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Pam B, Honarmand JS, Zare KS. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical specimens, an atomic force microscopic (AFM) study. Microb Pathog. 2017;110:533–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, O’Connell JX, Duncan CP. Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(5):672–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(16):1645–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Bonaventura G, D'Antonio D, Catamo G, Ballone E, Piccolomini R. Comparison of Etest, agar dilution, broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods for testing in vitro activity of levofloxacin against Staphylococcus spp. isolated from neutropenic cancer patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002;19(2):147–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee CK, Barbier BA, Bottos EM, McDonald IR, Cary SC. The Inter-Valley Soil Comparative Survey: the ecology of Dry Valley edaphic microbial communities. ISME J. 2012;6(5):1046–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Goda A, Maruyama F, Michi Y, Nakagawa I, Harada K. Analysis of the factors affecting the formation of the microbiome associated with chronic osteomyelitis of the jaw. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(5):O309–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D590–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19):2460–1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Reizner W, Hunter JG, O'Malley NT, Southgate RD, Schwarz EM, Kates SL. A systematic review of animal models for Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. Eur Cell Mater. 2014;27:196–212.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Isigidi BK, Devriese LA, Van Hoof J. A note on the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from raw minced meat. J Appl Bacteriol. 1985;59(5):403–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Lin MH, Shu JC, Lin LP, et al. Elucidating the crucial role of poly N-acetylglucosamine from Staphylococcus aureus in cellular adhesion and pathogenesis. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124216.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55(4):611–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley W, et al. Effect of coating on properties of esthetic orthodontic nickel-titanium wires. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(2):319–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ivanov IE, Kintz EN, Porter LA, et al. Relating the physical properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharides to virulence by atomic force microscopy. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(5):1259–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen J, Li T, Zhou X, et al. Characterization of the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats sites in Streptococcus mutans isolated from early childhood caries patients. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;83:174–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sedghizadeh PP, Kumar SK, Gorur A, et al. Microbial biofilms in osteomyelitis of the jaw and osteonecrosis of the jaw secondary to bisphosphonate therapy. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(10):1259–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gaetti-Jardim E Jr, Landucci LF, de Oliveira KL, et al. Microbiota associated with infections of the jaws. Int J Dent. 2012;2012:369751.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Cameron DR, Jiang JH, Kostoulias X, Foxwell DJ, Peleg AY. Vancomycin susceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is mediated by YycHI activation of the WalRK essential two-component regulatory system. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30823.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao Y, Verma V, Belcheva A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus methicillin-resistance factor fmtA is regulated by the global regulator SarA. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43998.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Fukuchi K, Kasahara Y, Asai K, et al. The essential two-component regulatory system encoded by yycF and yycG modulates expression of the ftsAZ operon in Bacillus subtilis. Microbiology. 2000;146(Pt 7):1573–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin PK, Li T, Sun D, Biek DP, Schmid MB. Role in cell permeability of an essential two-component system in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(12):3666–73.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Mascher T, Helmann JD, Unden G. Stimulus perception in bacterial signal-transducing histidine kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70(4):910–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Stein T, Borchert S, Kiesau P, et al. Dual control of subtilin biosynthesis and immunity in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2002;44(2):403–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Dubrac S, Boneca IG, Poupel O, Msadek T. New insights into the WalK/WalR (YycG/YycF) essential signal transduction pathway reveal a major role in controlling cell wall metabolism and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(22):8257–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Howden BP, McEvoy CR, Allen DL, et al. Evolution of multidrug resistance during Staphylococcus aureus infection involves mutation of the essential two component regulator WalKR. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(11):e1002359.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Gardete S, Kim C, Hartmann BM, et al. Genetic pathway in acquisition and loss of vancomycin resistance in a methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain of clonal type USA300. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8(2):e1002505.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Clarke SR, Foster SJ. Surface adhesins of Staphylococcus aureus. Adv Microb Physiol. 2006;51:187–224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bazari PAM, Honarmand Jahromy S, Zare Karizi S. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical specimens, an atomic force microscopic (AFM) study. Microb Pathog. 2017;110:533–9.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement