Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis surgical correction postoperative evaluation via SRS-22 domain investigation

  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research201813:5

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0699-4

  • Received: 4 September 2017
  • Accepted: 14 December 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The SRS-22 is used to evaluate clinical outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis patients. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) domains and satisfaction with management in patients who underwent surgical correction for ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis. The relationship between patient satisfaction and SRS-22 domain scores will feedback abundant information of therapeutic effect and significance for treatment guidance.

Methods

In this work, 106 patients with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis at a single institution, who underwent posterior spinal fusion of five levels or more to the sacrum, completed SRS-22 evaluation preoperatively and followed up for a minimum of 2-year postoperation. Wilcoxon tests were performed to compare preoperative with 2-year postoperative scores. Spearman correlations were investigated to evaluate associations between the 2-year treatment satisfaction and therapeutic effect in SRS-22 domain scores.

Results

There were 12 females and 94 males with mean BMI of 16.4 kg/m2 and at the mean age of 46.3 years. All of the primary surgeries were treatments performed with mean follow-up of 26 months. A statistical improvement between paired pre- and 2-year postoperative SRS-22 domain scores and most radiographical parameters, commonly P ≤ 0.05, was designed and implemented. The majority of patients gave SRS-22 satisfaction score with 3.0 or more (88.5%) or 4.0 or more (68.8%), which are consistent with the moderate ceiling effect. Spearman coefficient correlations between the SRS-22 domain scores and patient satisfaction were all statistically significant, and they were from low to strong: [Mental (0.30), Activity (0.71), Pain (0.25), and Appearance (0.40)]. Furthermore, correlations for all radiographical and operative parameters were from low to strong.

Conclusion

SRS-22 Activity domain correlates strongest with patient satisfaction in ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis patients who have undergone surgical correction at 2-year follow-up.

Keywords

  • Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22)
  • Ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis
  • Pedicle subtraction osteotomy
  • Activity
  • Health-related quality of life (HRQOL)

Background

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease, primarily involving the sacroiliac joints and spinal column, in a caudal to cranial manner. Thoracolumbar kyphosis deformity leading to cosmetic and functional impairments with a decrease in the quality of life is common in late-stage patients, resulting in the inability to look ahead, lie flat, dyspnea, and dysphagia [1]. With the progresses of the surgical technic, such as multiple Smith-Petersen osteotomy (SPO), pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), vertebral column resection (VCR), and vertebral column decancellation (VCD), patients prefer operation to release from pain [2].

The Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire is a simple and practical disease-specific patient-based measure of treatment effectiveness for patients of spinal deformity [35], which has been a widely used instrument. The SRS-22 questionnaire, which measures five domains: Pain, Activity, Appearance, Mental, and Satisfaction, has already been proved to be reliable, valid, and responsive to change.

Patient satisfaction has played a vital role in the past two decades. The evolution of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcome measures has been in parallel with an attempted change from quantity to quality of care [6]. However, there have been no previous literature expounding on the patient satisfaction with both care and outcomes after surgery for AS patients so far. The relationship between change in SRS-22 domain scores and patient satisfaction after the surgical correction of ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis has also not been reported yet. Currently, some of the orthopedic surgeons consider that the pain relief and improvement of activity function are necessary for AS kyphosis patients to increase their basic life quality. However, the others hold that the appearance correction should be paid more attention in AS kyphosis patients like that of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult deformity [7]. The target of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction after surgical management of AS. The relationship between change in SRS-22 domain scores and patient satisfaction was investigated and analyzed in details.

Methods

Patients

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, and all patients provided informed consent. All procedures involving human participants were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Permissions from all the patients are received in this study. One hundred seventeen AS patients were reviewed retrospectively, from April 2011 to November 2014. The diagnosis of AS was made based on clinical features, radiographic features, and laboratory tests according to New York standards. All the patients were trapped in horizontal vision, were unable to stand upright, and suffered from chronic back pain, which seriously impacted their daily life. The primary and revision surgeries were performed for the patients. Their mean age was 46.3 (ranging from 38 to 62), and the average duration of symptoms was 23 years (ranging from 14 to 39 years). One hundred six patients (90%) of the 117 eligible patients, who were identified, completed the SRS-22 outcome instruments preoperation and 2 years postoperation.

Planning and surgical technique

Single-level PSO was usually performed at L3 to regain lumbar lordosis. All the patients were operated with the same spine osteotomy (single-level PSO) (Fig. 1). According to the characteristics of the patients’ deformities, the osteotomy could be performed at L2 or L4 based on the sagittal vertical axis SVA value. The patients underwent the posterior spinal fusion of five levels or more. Regarding the osteotomy sites, 31 should be at L2, 57 at L3, and 18 at L4.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

An example patient (46-year-old male) presents the severe kyphosis deformity. The most improvement of the SRS activity appears 1.5 pre-operation and 4.8 post-operation. The postoperative satisfaction with management score is 5.0. The SRS Appearance score increases from 2.0 to 4.0, the SRS pain score increases from 3.6 to 4.4, and the SRS mental health score increases from 2.8 to 4.2. Preoperative a posteroanterior and b lateral radiographs and postoperative c posteroanterior and d lateral radiographs

Questionnaire method

SRS-22 is a scoliosis or spinal deformity specific questionnaire with 22 items and 5 domains: Pain, Activity, Appearance, Mental, and Satisfaction and Total Score [3, 8, 9]. Each domain score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better outcomes. It is the most widely used outcome instrument to measure changes in HRQOL outcomes in patients with spinal deformity and has been proved to be reliable and valid.

The SRS Satisfaction domain is calculated from two items which have five responses ranging from “Very unsatisfied” to “Very satisfied”. There are item 21 “Are you satisfied with the results of your back management?” and item 22 “Would you have the same management again if you had the same condition?” Since the SRS Satisfaction items are included in calculating the SRS Total Score, the SRS Subscore is also determined [10]. The SRS Subscore is calculated similarly without the SRS Satisfaction item inclusion. Changes in SRS domain scores are calculated by subtracting the preoperative domain scores from the 2-year domain scores.

Radiographical data

All patients had standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of their whole spines which were acquired before and immediately after surgery and 2-year follow-up. The following parameters were measured on the radiographs (Fig. 1).

The radiologic measurements, containing lumbar lordosis (LL), the Cobb angle of superior endplate of L1 and inferior endplate of L5; pelvic index (PI),an anatomical parameter; pelvic tilt (PT), a pelvic positional parameter; sacral slope (SS), as the angle between the sacral plate and the horizontal line; sagittal vertical axis (SVA), as the distance between the C7 plumb line (C7PL) and the poster superior corner of S1; and the chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), as the angle formed by the vertical line and the line drawn from the chin to the brow, were measured on the pre- and postoperative photographs of patients who could stand with the patient’s hips and knees fully extended naturally [11]. The corrections of these parameters were defined as the last follow-up measurement minus the preoperative measurement.

Statistical analysis

Because the individual items were ordinal measures, the domain scores were treated as long ordinal measures, and therefore, a more conservative nonparametric statistical analysis was performed. Patients in a prospective database who completed the SRS-22 preoperatively and the SRS-30 1 year postoperatively were identified. Answers to the last eight questions of the SRS-30 were used as anchors to determine minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the Pain, Appearance, and Activity domains; Subscore; and Total Score using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis. Calculations of MCID using distribution-based methods were also done [12]. When combined with previous reports, the results of this study in a population with ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis undergoing surgical treatment show MCID for SRS-22 scores can be estimated as 0.4. Wilcoxon tests were used to compare preoperative and 2-year postoperative domain scores. Spearman correlations were used to evaluate associations between the 2-year postoperative SRS-22 Satisfaction score and changes in the SRS-22 Total Score, Subscore, Pain, Activity, Appearance, and Mental domain scores; and all radiographic parameters from pre- to 2-year postoperation (Table 1). Correlation coefficients (r) ranging from 0 to 0.19 were considered very weak, 0.20 to 0.39 as weak, 0.40 to 0.59 as moderate, 0.60 to 0.79 as strong, and 0.80 to 1 as very strong. And we also made a heat map of the SRS-22 domain scores and radiographical parameters to clarify correlations more clearly (Fig. 4).
Table 1

Spearman coefficient correlations between the change in SRS-22 domain scores or radiographical parameters and SRS-22 Satisfaction score at 2-year postoperative

Parameters

r

P

Follow-up

− 0.13

0.19

Diagnosis

− 0.02

0.74

Number of comorbidities

0.06

0.55

BMI

0.01

0.92

Smoking

0.07

0.419

Osteotomies

− 0.04

0.635

Level of surgery

0.10

0.24

Operative time

0.08

0.38

SRS-22 Pain change

0.25

0.03

SRS-22 Appearance change

0.40

0.00

SRS-22 Activity change

0.71

0.00

SRS-22 Mental change

0.30

0.01

SRS-22 Subscore

0.35

0.00

Radiographical parameters

 CBVA change

− 0.44

0.00

 SVA change

− 0.60

0.00

 LL change

0.61

0.00

 SS change

0.42

0.00

 PT change

− 0.30

0.01

 PI change

− 0.27

0.02

 PI − LL change

− 0.44

0.00

P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all comparisons. Spearman coefficient (r) correlations ranging from 0 to 0.19 were considered very weak, 0.20 to 0.39 as weak, 0.40 to 0.59 as moderate, 0.60 to 0.79 as strong, and 0.80 to 1 as very strong

All statistical analyses were done by using SPSS (version 17.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results

There were 12 females and 94 males with a mean BMI of 16.4 kg/m2 and mean age of 46.3 years. There were all primary surgeries with mean follow-up of 26 months. The operating time was 232 ± 52 min for spine osteotomy surgery. The blood loss was 1240 ± 542 ml. All osteotomies were performed in the lower thoracic and lumbar segments (T12–L3). All patients could walk with horizontal vision and lie on their backs postoperatively. Using a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) threshold for the pre- to postoperative change for each domain score of 0.4, the percentage of patients reaching MCID was calculated (Fig. 2). The proportion of patients reaching MCID was highest for SRS-22 Activity (73%).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Comparison of scores of SRS-22 before and 2 years after surgery and number of patients achieving MCID thresholds for each domain (n = 106).*P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all comparisons

There was a statistically significant change in most of the radiographical parameters (Fig. 3). Additionally, there was a statistically significant improvement between all paired pre- and 2-year postoperative SRS-22 domain scores [Mental (0.30), Activity (0.71), Pain (0.25), moderate (Appearance (0.40), SRS-22R Subscore (0.35))], with the greatest improvement in the SRS-22R Activity domain (P < 0.05). The majority of patients had a 2-year Satisfaction score 4.0 or more (68.8%) or 3.0 or more (88.5%) (Table 1). Spearman correlations between the change in domain scores or radiographical parameters and the SRS-22 Satisfaction score at 2 years postoperative were calculated for 20 different parameters. Twelve of the 20 parameters (60%) analyzed were statistically significant with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.01 and 0.66, indicating weak to strong correlations (Table 1).Correlation between the 2-year change in SRS-22 Activity domain and the 2-year postoperative SRS-22 Satisfaction score (0.71) was the strongest. The next greatest correlation was between the 2-year change in SRS Appearance score and the 2-year postoperative SRS Satisfaction score (0.40); SRS-22 Mental score (0.30) and Pain score (0.25) had a weak correlation. The rest were either weak or very weak. The postoperative radiographical data of the patients were significantly improved, and the degree of improvement was also significantly. The strongest correlation was the SVA change (− 0.60) and the LL change (0.61). The CBVA change (− 0.44), the SS change (0.38) and the PI − LL change (− 0.44) had a moderate correlation. And the PT change (− 0.30) and the PI change (− 0.31) had a weak correlation. (Table 1).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Comparison of mean radiographical measures preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. All comparisons were statistically significant (*P < 0.05)

Discussion

Nowadays, there is a growing concern over the patient satisfaction in spine surgery. More and more medical units consider patient satisfaction to evaluate the quality of medical services. So, the normative assessment of factors affecting the performance of AS patients is significant to promote medical services with humanism [6]. In the Chinese population of patients with AS undergoing surgical correction, there are critical correlations between the change in the SRS-22 Satisfaction score and the SRS-22 four domain scores, similar to the change in the SRS-22 Satisfaction score and radiographical parameters. In Asher’s original study on the SRS-22 including 58 patients with scoliosis, the author reported a correlation coefficient of 0.66 between the Satisfaction and Appearance domains and a correlation coefficient of 0.67 between Satisfaction and SRS-22R Subscore which indicates strong correlations [3, 4]. Likewise, in a multicenter study of 745 patients with AIS, Carreon et al. found that Subscore and Appearance had the strongest correlation in the study investigating patient satisfaction after surgical correction of AIS [10]. Similar to the adolescent population, in a study of 135 patients with adult spine deformity, the author found that SRS-22R appearance correlated most with patient satisfaction in adult deformity patients undergoing five or more level fusions to the sacrum at 5-year follow-up [7].

AS osteotomy surgery, as well as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and adult spine deformity surgery, were adopted to remedy the appearance problems in most cases. In contrast, in our study, SRS Activity domain was obviously observed among all the SRS domains in AS patient groups. Our study calculated the percentage of patients reaching MCID for each domain (Fig. 2), and Appearance, Pain, and Mental domains had a lower proportion of patients reaching MCID by using an MCID threshold of 0.5 for all domains. The weak to strong correlations observed between the change in SRS-22 domain scores and the 2-year SRS-22 Satisfaction score may also be attributable to the prominent ceiling effect in the Satisfaction domain. Although no floor effects were observed, a significant ceiling effect for the Satisfaction domain was seen in the current study, with 33% of patients scoring a 5 and 68.8% scoring greater than 4 (Table 2) [9]. The weak to moderate correlations may also be due to the lack of responsiveness of the SRS-22 to measure clinically relevant changes in pain and mental health 2 years after correction of kyphosis in the AS population. Although the changes in domain scores were statistically significant, the mathematical values of the change in scores were small and similar to the sample population from which the SRS-22 was initially studied. It may actually have been significant clinically relevant change in these domains after orthomorphia when the changes in Appearance, Pain and Mental health truly responded in SRS-22. The data from studies examining the relationship between radiographic parameters and satisfaction outcomes demonstrate a considerably strong, linear correlation between satisfaction and SVA change and LL change. This phenomenon reminds us that the orthopedist may ignore the patient’s postoperative functional recovery and the quality of life when they excessively pursue the deformity correction and the imaging improvements during the operation. And longer fusion segments can indeed better correct the deformity, but the impact on the motion of spinal surgery patients should not be ignored. In our opinion, the change of the SVA and the LL need more attention in the course of surgery (Fig. 4). Global spinal realignment should attempt to obtain postoperative SVA < 50 mm and LL = PI± 9° [13], and we require ambition to balance radiographic parameters with good clinical judgment, so that we can gain more patient satisfaction and postoperative outcomes.
Table 2

Distribution of SRS-22R Satisfaction score

Satisfaction score

Frequency

Percentage

Cumulative percentage

5.0

35

33.0

33

4.5

17

16.0

48

4.0

22

20.8

68.8

3.5

8

7.5

76.3

3.0

13

12.2

88.5

2.5

3

2.8

91.3

2.0

6

5.7

97

1.5

1

0.9

97.9

1.0

1

0.9

100

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Heat map of the SRS-22 domain scores and radiographical parameters. It shows the evolution of the signals (quenching/enhancing), suggesting high variance in the response

In the AS population, the surgical correction of their kyphosis may have a limited impact on their activity, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction when compared with the larger role that educational, physiological, socio-cultural, and biopsychological factors play. In our conversation with patients, the improvement of the patient’s activities by operation is much greater than that of the appearance. But it does not reflect a statistically significant difference in mathematics. Therefore, this study offers a fundamental principle to improve the AS deficiencies via SRS-22 investigation. What is more, a number of other factors also affect the relatives’ satisfaction with the degree of overall treatment outcomes, such as experience of patients and relatives during the hospitalization, relationships with the surgeon and the surgeon’s assistants, and so on. The patients’ case information will feedback more advantages.

Conclusions

In summary, the scale of the evaluation of SRS-22 Activity domain can present the treatment of patient satisfaction. Harmony among spinopelvic parameters is one of the important factors. The activity of patients with kyphosis in ankylosing spondylitis is one of the key factors to evaluate a successful treatment. Different with traditional awareness, appearance is supposed to be the most critical consideration to plan a surgical strategy. This work can guide clinical spine surgeons with patients’ satisfaction expectations and balance all the surgical correction parameters.

Abbreviations

AS: 

Ankylosing spondylitis

C7PL: 

C7 plumb line

CBVA: 

Chin-brow vertical angle

HRQOL: 

Health-related quality of life

LL: 

Lumbar lordosis

PI: 

Pelvic index

PSO: 

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy

PT: 

Pelvic tilt

SRS-22: 

Scoliosis Research Society-22

SVA: 

Sagittal vertical axis

VCD: 

Vertebral column decancellation

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data requests.

Authors’ contributions

ZH collected the clinical data, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. FQH and WHH helped in collecting the clinical data and participated in the design of the study. YYH and YW participated in the statistical analysis. XSZ contributed to project advising and participated in its design. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained for each participant. All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
The Department of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

References

  1. Braun J, Sieper J. Ankylosing spondylitis. Lancet. 2007;369(9570):1379–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang X, Zhang Z, Wang J, et al. Vertebral column decancellation: a new spinal osteotomy technique for correcting rigid thoracolumbar kyphosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(5):672–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, Manna B. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):70–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):63–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Berven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, Hu SS, Bradford DS. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(18):2164–9. discussion 2169View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Truumees E. Appropriate use of satisfaction scores in spine care. Spine J. 2013;13(9):1013–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gum JL, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. SRS22R appearance domain correlates most with patient satisfaction after adult deformity surgery to the sacrum at 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(16):1297–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, Burton DC, Alanay A, Bago J. Refinement of the SRS-22 health-related quality of life questionnaire function domain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(5):593–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, Manna B. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):74–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Carreon LY, Sanders JO, Diab M, Sturm PF, Sucato DJ. Patient satisfaction after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(12):965–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Qian BP, Jiang J, Qiu Y, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu ZZ. The presence of a negative sacral slope in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with severe thoracolumbar kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(22):e188.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawford CH, Glassman SD, Bridwell KH, Berven SH, Carreon LY. The minimum clinically important difference in SRS-22R total score, appearance, activity and pain domains after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(6):377–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(25):2224–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement