Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

The unresolved problem of beta-2 microglobulin amyloid deposits in the intervertebral discs of long-term dialysis patients

Contributed equally
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research201712:194

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0697-6

Received: 29 September 2017

Accepted: 11 December 2017

Published: 21 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Dialysis-related destructive spondyloarthropathy caused by beta-2 microglobulin (β2M) amyloid deposits in intervertebral discs is a major burden for patients undergoing long-term dialysis. This study aimed to quantify the presence of β2M amyloid deposits in the intervertebral disc tissue of such patients and analyze whether there was a significant correlation between β2M accumulation and the duration of dialysis.

Methods

Two groups of patients who had undergone surgery for degenerative spinal pathologies were selected: the dialysis group (n = 29) with long-term dialysis and the control group (n = 10) with no renal impairment. Tissue sections were prepared from specimens of intervertebral disc tissue obtained during spinal surgery and analyzed via histological staining, including immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Congo red.

Results

There was a statistically significant multifold increase of β2M expression in the disc tissue of long-term dialysis patients when compared to non-dialysis patients, as shown by both IHC (0.019 ± 0.023 μm2 vs. 0.00020 ± 0.00033 μm2, respectively; p = 0.012) and Congo red staining (0.027 ± 0.041 μm2 vs. 9.240 × 10−5 ± 5.261 × 10−5 μm2, respectively; p = 0.047). We also note a moderate strength positive correlation between the duration of dialysis and positive IHC (r = 0.39; p = 0.015) and Congo-red staining (r = 0.42; p = 0.007).

Conclusions

The problem of β2M amyloidosis in long-term dialysis patients remains unresolved even with predominant use of high-flux dialysis membranes. This highlights the insufficiency of current dialysis modalities to effectively filter β2M.

Keywords

AmyloidBeta-2 microglobulinDialysisSpondyloarthropathyCongo redIntervertebral disc

Background

The incidence and prevalence of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) has increased throughout the world [13], becoming a major public health problem with high economic and social costs [4, 5]. The number of patients receiving dialysis therapy has rapidly increased to an all-time high, especially in developing nations [5]. A large proportion of these patients are elderly and predisposed to increased risks for multiple adverse outcomes, such as hypotension, anemia, myopathy, and atrial fibrillation [69]. One of the major problems in such patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis is beta-2 microglobulin (β2M) amyloidosis [10]. The accumulation of β2M amyloid fibrils in the musculoskeletal system can lead to various degenerative conditions, depending on the musculoskeletal site of involvement [11, 12]. In the spine, such accumulation can damage the intervertebral discs and their adjacent endplates, leading to spinal instability and neurological compromise [13]. This destructive amyloid spondyloarthropathy is a major cause of disability in long-term dialysis patients.

There are two types of dialysis treatment, hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), which are extensively practiced to manage ESKD. However, clinical outcomes may vary depending on different factors, such as age, comorbidities, and dialysis time. Studies demonstrate that PD offers equivalent or better survival than HD in the first year of treatment, especially in patients with advanced age and diabetes [14]. In addition, there are no reported differences in the occurrence of β2M amyloidosis and musculoskeletal complications between patients treated with HD and PD [11]. However, β2M levels are known to be influenced by the membrane used for HD treatment. For example, the levels of β2M are said to be significantly reduced in patients treated with high-flux HD, which uses polysulfone membranes, when compared to patients treated with conventional dialysis using cellulose membranes [15].

Recently, high-flux HD is widely performed to improve the quality and efficacy of dialysis treatment. With the advent of this technique, occurrence of destructive amyloid spondyloarthropathy should be less likely, though it has to be studied. To address this question, we quantified the presence of β2M amyloid deposits in intervertebral discs among long-term dialysis patients who had undergone HD or PD and analyzed whether there was a significant correlation between β2M accumulation and the duration of dialysis.

Methods

Retrospectively, we reviewed records of patients with ESKD who were on long-term dialysis therapy, but also underwent spinal surgery for single or multilevel degeneration with or without spinal instability. We shortlisted the patients for whom formalin-fixed paraffin wax embedded disc tissue samples were available for further analysis, resulting in a sample size containing a dialysis group of 29 samples. A small control group of 10 samples with similar demographic characteristics (e.g., age, body-mass index, surgical level and location), but without any renal disease, were selected for comparison (i.e., the non-dialysis group). This selection method was non-randomized as only those patients whose disc tissue samples were available for further analysis were chosen.

We tabulated several basic parameters, including age, gender, underlying disease, and the severity of disc degeneration. Chronic kidney disease, mineral and bone disorder-related parameters, such as serum levels of alkaline phosphatase, calcium, and phosphate, were considered. We also included several dialysis-related parameters, such as type, duration, and adequacy (Kt/V; in which K = the dialyzer clearance, t = time, and V = urea distribution volume) of the dialysis treatment. The severity of disc degeneration at the surgical level among patients of both groups was graded according to Pfirrmann’s classification using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images [16]. We acquired and prepared slides of the formalin-fixed paraffin wax embedded disc tissue samples from the Tissue Bank. The disc specimens were fixed in neutral buffered formalin, embedded into paraffin wax blocks, and stored at room temperature at the Tissue Bank with no storage time limit. These unstained slides were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated through a series of graded alcohol washes, and soaked in distilled water before staining. Congo red and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining were then performed on all acquired samples.

Congo red staining

After sample preparation, the sections from all 39 samples were stained with Mayer’s Hematoxylin Solution (MHS1-100ML, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 10 min and thoroughly washed for 5 min, after which they were immediately soaked with alkaline sodium chloride solution for 20 min, followed by alkaline Congo red solution for 20 min (HT60 kit, Sigma-Aldrich). The sections were dehydrated with a series of graded alcohol washes and then mounted for evaluation under normal and polarized light microscopy.

Immunohistochemistry staining

After sample preparation, the 39 sections were washed twice in PBS (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min. The sections were blocked with a solution of 10% normal serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY) and 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS for 3 h and then incubated with anti-β2M antibody (ab195531, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at 1:400 dilution for 30 min. We added 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate (Abcam) and incubated the sectioned samples for 5 min, followed by thorough washing with tap water for another 5 min, and finally staining with Mayer’s Hematoxylin Solution for 10 min. The sections were dehydrated with a series of graded alcohol washes and then mounted for evaluation under light microscopy.

Protein extraction and western blotting

Intervertebral disc tissue samples were obtained with written informed consent from two participants: one was a non-dialysis patient who underwent an L5-S1 discectomy, and the other was a patient who had received HD for 13 months before undergoing an L4-L5 discectomy. After washing the surgically harvested tissues with PBS twice, the tissues were mashed with a surgical blade. Next, 500 μl of T-PER Tissue Protein Extraction Reagent (78510, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL) was added to 0.05 g of the tissue, after which an ultrasonic homogenizer (Q700; QSonica, LLC, Newtown, CT) was used to breakdown the samples. The protein material was then rested on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 rpm at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant was collected. The protein sample was then separated using SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and soaked with blocking reagent for 3 min. This was followed by overnight incubation in antibody dilution buffer containing the primary anti-β2M antibody (1:2000; Abcam), as well as anti-beta actin monoclonal antibody (1:5000; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL) as an internal control. After washing away the unbound antibodies with TTBS (1× TBS buffer and 0.1% Tween 20; Sigma-Aldrich) three times for 5 min each, rabbit anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:10,000) was incubated for 2 h, followed by washing with TTBS again, and visualized by Pierce Enhanced Chemiluminescence Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Statistics

Quantitative analysis of histological staining was performed using Image J (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD) to estimate the proportion of positively stained area in the sectioned intervertebral disc tissue samples. Measurements were done for both IHC and Congo red stained sections among both groups, which were tabulated for comparison. A correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the strength of association between the duration of dialysis and the positively stained area by either of the staining methods. The percentage of the positively stained area over the total area was calculated.

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). For data analysis, the Student’s t test was used for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. A p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 summarizes the demographic data among the 39 samples that were selected for the study. The dialysis group had a mean age of 62.4 ± 8 years, and the control non-dialysis group a mean age of 59.4 ± 6.5 years. The numbers of patients with single- or multilevel disc degeneration in both groups were statistically similar. Predominantly, surgeries were done for patients with lumbar degeneration, except for 4 samples among the dialysis group for whom the surgery was done for single-level cervical degeneration. However, this small number did not result in any statistical difference between the groups. The number of patients with associated comorbid conditions, including diabetes mellitus and hypertension, were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference between the dialysis and non-dialysis patients in terms of their serum-based alkaline phosphatase, calcium, and phosphate levels. For the dialysis group, there were 12 grade III, 4 grade IV, and 5 grade V discs. For the non-dialysis group, there were 7 grade III, 2 grade IV, and 1 grade V discs. The severity of disc degeneration also did not show any statistical difference between the groups. Therefore, we considered the groups to be appropriately matched.
Table 1

Comparison of demographic data between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups

Parameters

Dialysis group

Non-dialysis group

p value

n = 29

n = 10

Age [mean ± SD (range)]

62.4 ± 8 (44–75)

59.4 ± 6.5 (48–67)

0.28

BMI

23.86 ± 3.77

23.91 ± 3.94

0.97

Level

 Single-level

14

6

0.72

 Multi-level

15

4

 

Location

 Cervical

4

0

0.55

 Lumbar

25

10

 

Comorbidity

 Diabetes mellitus

12

2

0.27

 Hypertension

26

6

0.06

Serum level

 Serum ALP

142.2 ± 73.09

102.4 ± 35.8

0.11

 Serum Ca

10.1 ± 0.86

9.7 ± 0.56

0.18

 Serum P

4.65 ± 2.01

3.86 ± 0.14

0.23

Dialysis duration (months)

82.5 ± 44.3

Dialysis adequacy (Kt/V)

1.58 ± 0.19

SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, ALP alkaline phosphatase, Ca calcium, P phosphorous

For those in the dialysis group, dialysis was done for a mean duration of 82.5 ± 44.3 months, ranging from 17.08 to 194.4 months (Table 1). There were 22 samples on high-flux HD and 7 samples on PD. The mean time interval between specimen collection and histological examination was 23.83 ± 19.5 months (range, 0–76 months) in the dialysis group. However, the time interval was only a few months for those in the non-dialysis group.

Histology examination of the sections following Congo red staining under polarized light showed areas of apple-green birefringence that indicated amyloid deposits. The mean positively stained area among HD patients of the dialysis group was 0.025 ± 0.045 μm2, while for PD patients it was 0.034 ± 0.028 μm2. The consolidated measurement for the dialysis group (0.027 ± 0.041 μm2) proved to be significantly higher than that of the non-dialysis group (9.240 × 10−5 ± 5.261 × 10−5 μm2; p = 0.047). Similarly, following IHC staining, the HD and PD group were immunopositive, measuring 0.021 ± 0.023 μm2 and 0.013 ± 0.023 μm2, respectively. Their consolidated measurement (0.019 ± 0.023 μm2) was also significantly higher than that of the non-dialysis group (0.00020 ± 0.00033 μm2; p = 0.012). However, there was no significant difference in the positively stained areas between the HD and PD patients using either IHC or Congo red staining (Table 2).
Table 2

Comparison of positively stained areas between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups using IHC and Congo red staining

Staining

Dialysis group (μm2)

Non-dialysis group (μm2)

p valuea

IHC

HD

0.021 ± 0.023

0.00020 ± 0.00033

0.012

PD

0.013 ± 0.023

 

p valueb

0.42

  

Congo red

HD

0.025 ± 0.045

0.0000924 ± 0.00005261

0.047

PD

0.034 ± 0.028

 

p valueb

0.63

  

IHC Immunohistochemistry staining, HD hemodialysis, PD peritoneal dialysis

aAnalyzed between dialysis and non-dialysis groups

bAnalyzed between HD and PD

Assessment of correlation between the duration of dialysis and the positively stained area as measured by either of the staining methods revealed a moderate strength positive correlation between the two (IHC staining, r = 0.39, p = 0.015; Congo red staining r = 0.42, p = 0.007). Quantitative results showed the percentage of IHC-stained area over the total tissue area was 2.30% for the dialysis group and 0.01% for the non-dialysis group. The percentage of Congo red stained area over the total area of the sectioned samples was 1.49% for the dialysis group and 0.009% for the non-dialysis group, which suggested that the expression of β2M amyloid deposits was 230-times and 165-times higher in the disc tissue of patients who had undergone dialysis therapy than in the tissue of non-dialysis patients, based on IHC and Congo red staining, respectively (Fig. 1).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Representative histological images of intervertebral disc sections from non-dialysis (0) and dialysis patients (1–3). a Congo red staining under normal light and amyloid deposition indicated in dark red. b Congo red staining under polarized light and amyloid deposition indicated in apple green. c IHC staining and β2M expression indicated in dark brown. Magnification: ×40

Western blot analysis indicated that β2M protein was present in the intervertebral disc tissue obtained from the patient who had received 13 months of HD therapy, but was absent in the disc tissue obtained from the non-dialysis patient (Fig. 2). Quantifying the band intensity using Image J, the ratio of β2M to β-actin for the dialysis patient was 147.77 times higher than that of the non-dialysis patient, which confirmed a significantly higher expression of β2M protein in the intervertebral disc tissue of the patient who underwent HD treatment when compared to the disc of the patient without dialysis treatment.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Western blot analysis of the intervertebral disc tissues of one non-dialysis and one dialysis patient. a Western blot analysis of β2M using beta-actin as a loading control. b Sagittal cut MRI image from the non-dialysis patient showed the right L5/S1 herniated nucleus pulposus with grade III degeneration. c Sagittal cut MRI image from the dialysis patient showed left L5/S1 extrusion type herniated nucleus pulposus with Grade IV degeneration

Discussion

β2M is constantly produced in the body and eliminated exclusively by the kidneys, mostly by glomerular filtration, after which 99.9% of the excreted proteins are reabsorbed in the renal tubules, where they are catabolized [17]. When glomerular filtration fails, increased serum levels of β2M are observed. This mechanism is the same for the accumulation of β2M in dialysis patients, as there is a bio-incompatibility that prevents the dialysis membranes from efficiently filtering β2M. Studies have shown that β2M levels significantly increase after conventional HD using cellulose acetate membranes [15].

However, the science of dialysis is constantly evolving, and the current standard method is different from the past conventional techniques and membranes. With the advent of high-flux dialysis, β2M levels are significantly decreased after dialysis [13]; hence, destructive amyloid spondyloarthopathy should be less likely to occur. However, even though a type of high-flux dialysis membrane was used in the majority of our patients, we still found β2M accumulation in their intervertebral discs. This signifies that even with recent advances in dialysis, β2M amyloidosis remains an unresolved issue. Moreover, conventional dialysis methods are still used in most developing countries [18], which further contributes to the prevalence of β2M amyloidosis.

Literature suggests that dialysis itself is an inflammatory stimulus, which can induce cytokine production (e.g., Interlukin-1, Interlukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α) and activate complement systems. Subsequently, the released cytokines stimulate the synthesis of β2M and its release by macrophages [19]. β2M is often highly expressed in articular cartilage of various joints and the synovial fluid, leading to compromised chondrocyte function that results in osteoarthritis [20, 21]. Apart from musculoskeletal involvement, β2M amyloid deposits can also be found in arterioles, venules, and muscularis propria of visceral organs, like those of the gastrointestinal tract and heart [22, 23].

Intervertebral discs, facet joints, and ligamentum flavum are the most susceptible sites for β2M accumulation in the vertebral column [24, 25]. This can lead to destructive spondyloarthropathy (DSA) and consequential disability [26]. DSA is increasingly recognized as a complication of long-term HD [24]. Clinical symptoms depend on the sites affected by β2M amyloid deposition. Most patients are asymptomatic; however, some might complain about localized back pain, which is often accompanied by arm pain or numbness [15, 27]. The radiological features include narrowing of disc space and the destruction of adjacent vertebral endplates [15]. This may precede segmental instability or neurological compromise [28, 29]. Our study included patients predominantly with lumbar disc degeneration and a few patients with cervical disc involvement. This non-random selection may not represent the demographics of the entire population. However, cervical discs are said to be more commonly affected, followed by the lumbar and upper thoracic discs, and then the middle and lower thoracic discs [24].

Disc degeneration can be graded according to Pfirrmann’s classification system [16]. However, we had 8 samples in the dialysis group who did not fit into any grade. This was due to the difficulty in deciding whether the radiological changes were caused by dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy or spondylodiscitis [27]. Usually, DRS presents as low signal intensity in the MRI of both T1 and T2 weighted images, unlike spondylodiscitis which presents as low signal intensity on T1 and high signal intensity on T2 weighted images [15, 27]. However, unusual signal intensity changes as we observed in a few of our cases can also be present; but post-operative culture of the disc material revealed no microorganisms suggestive of infection. Therefore, we considered these patients to have dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy.

Histological examination is the gold standard for diagnosing β2M amyloidosis. Our histological study included Congo red and IHC staining of disc material sections. Positive Congo red staining, appearing as distinct birefringence under polarized light, and immunostaining of amyloid deposits with a labeled anti-β2M antibody are considered pathognomonic for the presence of β2M [30]. We also performed western blot analysis, but only for one patient from the dialysis group and one from the non-dialysis group. Our results suggest a multifold increase in β2M expression in the disc tissue of long-term dialysis patients. There was also a moderate strength positive correlation between the duration of dialysis and positive IHC and Congo red staining. These findings from our pilot analysis provide important insights into our understanding of β2M amyloidosis and highlight the need for dialysis membranes that can more effectively filter β2M molecules to help prevent potential long-term complications [10, 31].

This study was a cross-sectional prevalence measure with certain limitations. Considering the sample size, this study may be underpowered to draw potential conclusions. Also, not all patients had definite radiological evidence of DRS before surgery. However, β2M deposition was noted among all dialysis group patients. Further empirical evidence could be collected by performing western blot analysis for all the patients in the study.

Conclusions

We analyzed the presence of β2M amyloid deposits in the intervertebral discs of long-term dialysis patients using Congo red, IHC staining and western blot analysis of surgically harvested tissue. Our results showed a statistically significant multifold increase of β2M expression in the disc tissues of long-term dialysis patients when compared to non-dialysis patients. We also inferred a moderate strength positive correlation between the duration of dialysis and positive IHC and Congo red staining, representing the presence of β2M amyloids. Our findings highlight the issue of β2M amyloidosis still prevailing among long-term dialysis patients even with the advent of high-flux dialysis, therefore warranting further study.

Abbreviations

ALP: 

Alkaline phosphatase

BMI: 

Body mass index

Ca: 

Calcium

DSA: 

Destructive spondyloarthropathy

ESKD: 

End-stage kidney disease

HD: 

Hemodialysis

IHC: 

Immunohistochemistry

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

P: 

Phosphorous

PD: 

Peritoneal dialysis

SD: 

Standard deviation

β2M: 

Beta-2 microglobulin

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the Resource Center for Clinical Research, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, for providing statistical assistance. We thank the Tissue Bank, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, for providing the formalin-fixed paraffin wax embedded disc tissue samples.

Funding

The study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, with grant no. MOST 104-2314-B-182-012-MY2.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Authors’ contributions

TTT initiated the study, collected the data, performed the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript. AKKP participated in statistical analysis, data interpretation, manuscript drafting and revision. CCJ collected the data and helped drafting the manuscript. CCN supervised the study and provided opinions. NYJH prepared the manuscript and helped in the revision. TYL collected, analyzed, and interpreted the data. PLL sanctioned the final manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in compliance with the 1964 declaration of Helsinki, its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Extraction and evaluation of data was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Chang Gung Medical Foundation with IRB no. 103-7370B on 2015/02/04.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Division, Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
(2)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Melmaruvathur Adhiparasakthi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Affiliated to the Tamil Nadu Dr. MGR Medical University, Tamil Nadu, India
(3)
Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
(4)
Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

References

  1. Coresh J, Byrd-Holt D, Astor BC, et al. Chronic kidney disease awareness, prevalence, and trends among U.S. adults, 1999 to 2000. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(1):180–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stengel B, Couchoud C. Chronic kidney disease prevalence and treated end-stage renal disease incidence: a complex relationship. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(8):2094–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Varma PP. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in India—where are we heading? Indian J Nephrol. 2015;25(3):133–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Joyce AT, Iacoviello JM, Nag S, et al. End-stage renal disease-associated managed care costs among patients with and without diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(12):2829–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Khanna U. The economics of dialysis in India. Indian J Nephrol. 2009;19(1):1–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Stevens LA, Viswanathan G, Weiner DE. Chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease in the elderly population: current prevalence, future projections, and clinical significance. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17(4):293–301.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee YC, Hung SY, Wang HH, et al. Different risk of common gastrointestinal disease between groups undergoing hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis or with non-end stage renal disease: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(36):e1482.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shen CH, Zheng CM, Kiu KT, et al. Increased risk of atrial fibrillation in end-stage renal disease patients on dialysis: a nationwide, population-based study in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(25):e3933.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Shu CC, Hsu CL, Wei YF, et al. Risk of tuberculosis among patients on dialysis: the predictive value of serial interferon-gamma release assay. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(22):e3813.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Mumtaz A, Anees M, Bilal M, Ibrahim M. Beta-2 microglobulin levels in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2010;21(4):701–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Soyupek F, Demir M, Suslu FE, Baykal B, Sezer MT, Yesildag A. The upper extremity musculoskeletal complications in dialysis patients: comparison between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(3):267–371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wada T, Miyata T, Sakai H, Kurokawa K. Beta2-microglobulin and renal bone disease. Perit Dial Int. 1999;19(Suppl 2):S413–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuffe MJ, Hadley MN, Herrera GA, Morawetz RB. Dialysis-associated spondylarthropathy. Report of 10 cases. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(4):694–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McDonald SP, Marshall MR, Johnson DW, Polkinghorne KR. Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(1):155–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Acchiardo S, Kraus AP Jr, Jennings BR. Beta 2-microglobulin levels in patients with renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 1989;13(1):70–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Boos N. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. 2001;26(17):1873–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wibell L. The serum level and urinary excretion of beta2-microglobulin in health and renal disease. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1978;26(6):295–301.Google Scholar
  18. Sinha A, Bagga A. Maintenance dialysis in developing countries. Pediatr Nephrol. 2015;30(2):211–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Scarpioni R, Ricardi M, Albertazzi V, De Amicis S, Rastelli F, Zerbini L. Dialysis-related amyloidosis: challenges and solutions. Int J Nephrol Renov Dis. 2016;9:319–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang H, Liew CC, Marshall KW. Microarray analysis reveals the involvement of beta-2 microglobulin (B2M) in human osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2002;10(12):950–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Melikoglu MA, Yildirim K, Senel K. Relationship between radiographic grading of osteoarthritis and serum beta-2 microglobulin. Ir J Med Sci. 2009;178(2):151–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ohashi K, Takagawa R, Hara M. Visceral organ involvement and extracellular matrix changes in beta 2-microglobulin amyloidosis--a comparative study with systemic AA and AL amyloidosis. Virchows Archiv. 1997;430(6):479–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuchs A, Jagirdar J, Schwartz IS. Beta 2-microglobulin amyloidosis (AB2M) in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. A new type of amyloid. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987;88(3):302–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohashi K, Hara M, Kawai R, et al. Cervical discs are most susceptible to beta 2-microglobulin amyloid deposition in the vertebral column. Kidney Int. 1992;41(6):1646–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ito M, Abumi K, Takeda N, Satoh S, Hasegawa K, Kaneda K. Pathologic features of spinal disorders in patients treated with long-term hemodialysis. Spine. 1998;23(19):2127–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Inatomi K, Matsumoto T, Tomonaga T, et al. Histological analysis of the ligamentum flavum of patients with dialysis-related spondyloarthropathy. J Orthop Sci. 2004;9(3):285–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiss E, Keusch G, Zanetti M, et al. Dialysis-related amyloidosis revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185(6):1460–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Vignes JR, Eimer S, Dupuy R, Donois E, Liguoro D. Beta(2)-microglobulin amyloidosis caused spinal cord compression in a long-term haemodialysis patient. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(4):322–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kato Y, Kanaya K, Itoh T. Destructive spondyloarthropathy of the atlantoaxial joint with severe spinal cord compression in long-term hemodialysis patients. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11(6):644–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jadoul M, Garbar C, van Ypersele de Strihou C. Pathological aspects of beta(2)-microglobulin amyloidosis. Semin Dial. 2001;14(2):86–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Traut M, Haufe CC, Eismann U, Deppisch RM, Stein G, Wolf G. Increased binding of beta-2-microglobulin to blood cells in dialysis patients treated with high-flux dialyzers compared with low-flux membranes contributed to reduced beta-2-microglobulin concentrations. Results of a cross-over study. Blood Purif. 2007;25(5–6):432–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement