Skip to main content

Advertisement

Retraction Note: Clinical efficacy of posterior versus anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis in adults: a meta-analysis

Article metrics

  • 2655 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

The original article was published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2014 9:10

Retraction

The Publisher and Editor regretfully retract this article [1] because the peer-review process was inappropriately influenced and compromised. As a result, the scientific integrity of the article cannot be guaranteed. A systematic and detailed investigation suggests that a third party was involved in supplying fabricated details of potential peer reviewers for a large number of manuscripts submitted to different journals. In accordance with recommendations from COPE we have retracted all affected published articles, including this one. It was not possible to determine beyond doubt that the authors of this particular article were aware of any third party attempts to manipulate peer review of their manuscript.

Reference

  1. 1.

    Yang P, He X, Haopeng L, Zang Q, Yang B. Clinical efficacy of posterior versus anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis in adults: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014;9:10.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Xijing He.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/1749-799X-9-10.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, P., He, X., Li, H. et al. Retraction Note: Clinical efficacy of posterior versus anterior instrumentation for the treatment of spinal tuberculosis in adults: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 10, 40 (2015) doi:10.1186/s13018-015-0177-9

Download citation