- Research article
- Open Access
Cervical open-door laminoplasty technique with simple sutures and bone grafts: a single institutional study with 30 consecutive cases
© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015
Received: 11 November 2014
Accepted: 1 January 2015
Published: 28 January 2015
Expansive open-door laminoplasty is widely accepted as a reliable procedure for cervical myelopathy. However, one acknowledged complication is spring-back complication or closure of the door which may result in restenosis of cervical canal and neurologic deterioration. The study aimed for addressing our cervical open-door laminoplasty technique with sutures and bone grafts and subsequently the follow-up outcomes.
Thirty consecutive patients who underwent open-door laminoplasty with the novel technique were included and followed for minimum 5 years from Jan 2006 to Dec 2007. Anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the vertebral canal of C4 was measured in lateral cervical radiographs. Neurologic scenarios were noted using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores.
Twenty-five males (83.3%) and five (16.7%) females with an average follow-up of 68 months were enrolled. The preoperative APD was 13.22 mm (±1.15), whereas the postoperative APD increased to 31.23 mm (±2.43) with an expansion ratio of 136.23% (P < 0.05). The JOA score increased from 8.5 preoperatively to 13.45 postoperatively with a recovery rate of 58.2% (P < 0.05). The elevated laminas were maintained open during the follow-up period.
Our technique with sutures and bone graft for laminoplasty is a simple and efficient method for maintaining the decompression of cervical canal and neurologic improvement.
During the past decades, expansive open-door laminoplasty (EL) has been widely accepted and utilized as a safe and reliable treatment modality for multilevel cervical myelopathy. It has a number of advantages in long-term issues over laminectomy . One expected advantage of EL over laminectomy is that it attains decompression and widening of the canal without removing posterior elements permanently, which results in expected better outcomes in the long-term run. Indeed, long-term follow-up lines of evidence shed light on the reliability of EL in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes [2-6]. One the other hand, a multitude of studies addressed methodological modifications of the original EL reported by Hirabayashi , aiming for avoiding spring-back closure or collapse of the open door [8-19]. In our previous study, we noted that spring-back closure occurred as high as 10% by case and 6% by level .
These new treatment modalities aim for more valid fixation of the open door by introducing mini-plates, screws, anchors or clips. However, the implantation of the aforementioned hardware might render the procedures complicated and risky to certain extent. In an effort to find a simple and effective modality to maintain the canal expansion, we devised a modification of EL with simple sutures and bone grafts derived from removed spinous processes on the hinged side on the basis of computer-aided method as we previously reported . This method allows for valid fixation of the elevated laminas without need of any additional instrumentation.
The study was approved by our institutional ethics review board of Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical Universtiy (No. 20050917_03), with written informed consent obtained from each patient. The study group consisted of 30 patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent cervical laminoplasty with sutures and bone grafts and were followed for minimum 5 years in a single institution from Jan 2006 to Dec 2007. All patients underwent cervical laminoplasty by a fixed and experienced spinal team (Prof. XK Li with 30 years of spinal surgical experience and Prof. HQ Wang with 10 years of spinal surgical experience).
Continuous drainage tube with negative pressure was used and the amount of drainage was monitored every 24 h following surgery. The drainage was removed once the amount of drainage was less than 50 mL within 24 h. Patients were immobilized with cervical collar for 4–6 weeks.
Neurologic outcome assessment
Neurologic status was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores for cervical myelopathy . The JOA recovery rate was utilized to reflect the degree of postoperative recovery of normal function [1,6,7,24,25].
All data were collected and noted on a spreadsheet and presented as mean ± SD. SPSS 17 (Chicago, IL, USA) package was used to perform the statistical analyses. Inter-class coefficient (ICC) was used to evaluate inter-rater reliability. Accordingly, reliability scores of less than 0.79, 0.80 to 0.89, and greater than 0.90 were considered as poor, good and excellent, respectively . ANOVA with repeated measures before and after surgery was compared. The threshold of significance was set as P value <0.05.
There were 25 males and 5 females with an average age of 58.7 years (range 30–73 years). The mean postoperative follow-up was 68 months. The causes of the myelopathy were the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in four patients and multilevel spondylosis in 26 patients. Eleven patients had symptoms of radiculopathy. Six patients presented due to injuries which aggravated symptoms of cervical stenotic myelopathy. The average duration of cervical myelopathy prior to presentation was 26.9 months. In total, 124 laminas were elevated. The mean number of lamina elevated was 4.1 for each patient. Levels of laminoplasty were as follows: C3-6 in 26 patients and C3-7 in 4 patients.
In general, all patients experienced decreased numbness of limbs and increased muscular strength following surgery. There were no cases with postoperative hematoma. The mean operative time was 1.5 (±SD, 0.25) h. The mean blood loss was 315 (±SD, 21) mL intraoperatively, whereas the amount of drainage postoperatively was 195 (±SD, 11) mL.
The mean preoperative JOA score was 8.5 (±SD, 2.9). At final follow-up, the postoperative JOA score was 13.45 (±SD,3.4) with a recovery rate of 58.2% using the method as previously proposed  (P < 0.05). One patient experience postoperative transient C5 motor paresis and eventually recovered within 6 months.
Cervical laminoplasty provides an alternative for multisegmental canal stenosis. It should be stressed that keeping the expansion obtained from laminoplasty is of crucial importance for the surgery. Postoperative deterioration due to spring-back closure of elevated laminas has been noted as a critical complication [1,3,20]. Indeed, Hirabayashi et al. noted re-closure of the door and utilized the supporting sutures to avoid it [1,7]. The concern of such complication has led numerous investigators to explore a variety of modified methods. Amongst the different modified methods, simplicity and efficiency are the ultimate pursue. However, the employment of plates, screws, anchors and clips might counteract the simplicity and increase the operation time, blood loss and morbidity. To address these issues, we devised the novel cervical laminoplasty with simple sutures and bone grafts to maintain the door open.
APD increments and expansion ratio after laminoplasty in the literature
Increments or expansion ratio at final follow-up
Hirabayashi  1983
Mean increase 3–4 mm
Chiba  2006
Yang  2007
Suture anchor fixation
Baba  1997
Mean increase 42%
Baba  1995
6.8 mm 40%
O’Brien  1996
8.4 mm 105%
Wang  1998
6.3 mm 64%
Itoh  1985
Bone blocks with wire ligatures
8.01 mm 136.23%
In addition, the cervical canal increments obtained by the classic Hirabayashi EL range from 3 to 5.9 mm according to various studies [1,2,6,25]. A number of studies with modified techniques hardly break through the ranges [10,16,18,19,27]. Amongst the reported modified techniques, O’Brien and colleagues noted a novel laminoplasty using miniplate augmentation with an expansion ratio of 105% . Their technique is also noteworthy, owing to the similar expansion ratio with ours. Consistent with our study, they also noted vigorous epidural bleeding upon decompression, which has been scarcely noted by other authors. This might be due to sufficient canal expansion and complete decompression upon the stenotic canal. However, the bleeding is totally controllable. On the other hand, the employment of plates and screws in O’Brien’s technique might weaken the advantages of the procedure. In particular, our simple sutures technique rather than plates augmentation is relatively simple.
Since the introduction of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) by Smith and Robinson in 1958, it has been widely performed to treat patients with degenerative cervical diseases. However, controversy still exists regarding the appropriate surgical treatment for multi-segmental degenerative cervical diseases involving three or more segments. For single or two-level cervical degenerative disease, we routinely choose ACDF with autogenous iliac bone graft and plate. For multi-segmental cervical degenerative disease over three segments or with cervical stenosis (as the case in Figure 4), we usually choose cervical expansive laminoplasty as we reported in the study on the basis of several factors. First, it will be very difficult, if not impossible to harvest over 3 suitable iliac bone stamps for reconstruction of dissected discs. Second, the technique we reported is economic in comparison with ACDF since no instrumentation is needed. No matter which approach the surgeon chooses, improved clinical outcome with ameliorated symptoms and limited costs.
Despite our study presented a novel open-door laminoplasty with relatively satisfactory outcomes, several limitations were present. The study comprised a relatively small number of patients and belonged to the type of retrospective study in essence. However, the technique and our experience in its attendant utilization can provide some beneficial information with regard to cervical laminoplasty surgical strategies.
In summary, we present our modification of laminoplasty with simple sutures and bone grafts. On the basis of our clinical and radiographic results, we find that the method is simple and effective. Furthermore, the method might attain the maximum canal expansion ratio according to the literature.
The authors would like to thank Dr Yan-Wu Liu and Dr Zhi-Quan Li for the technical support. The study was supported by Chinese National Natural Science Foudation Grant (No. 81270028).
- Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y. Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1983;8(7):693–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1994;19(5):507–10.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Satomi K, Ogawa J, Ishii Y, Hirabayashi K. Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2001;1(1):26–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Takaishi H, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1(2):168–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ogawa Y, Chiba K, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Takaishi H, Hirabayashi H, et al. Long-term results after expansive open-door laminoplasty for the segmental-type of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: a comparison with nonsegmental-type lesions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(3):198–204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy—average 14-year follow-up study. Spine. 2006;31(26):2998–3005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 1981;6(4):354–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien MF, Peterson D, Casey AT, Crockard HA. A novel technique for laminoplasty augmentation of spinal canal area using titanium miniplate stabilization. A computerized morphometric analysis. Spine. 1996;21(4):474–83. discussion 84.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee TT, Manzano GR, Green BA. Modified open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy: operative technique, outcome, and predictors for gait improvement. J Neurosurg. 1997;86(1):64–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang JM, Roh KJ, Kim DJ, Kim DW. A new method of stabilising the elevated laminae in open-door laminoplasty using an anchor system. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80(6):1005–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gillett GR, Erasmus AM, Lind CR. CG-clip expansive open-door laminoplasty: a technical note. Br J Neurosurg. 1999;13(4):405–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kawahara N, Tomita K, Shinya Y, Matsumoto T, Baba H, Fujita T, et al. Recapping T-saw laminoplasty for spinal cord tumors. Spine. 1999;24(13):1363.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mochida J, Nomura T, Chiba M, Nishimura K, Toh E. Modified expansive open-door laminoplasty in cervical myelopathy. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12(5):386–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiba K, Toyama Y. Development of new surgical treatments in spinal surgery: expansive open-door laminoplasty and percutaneous nucleotomy. Keio J Med. 2001;50(3):142–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kihara S, Umebayashi T, Hoshimaru M. Technical improvements and results of open-door expansive laminoplasty with hydroxyapatite implants for cervical myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4 Suppl):348–56. discussion 48–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang SC, Yu SW, Tu YK, Niu CC, Chen LH, Chen WJ. Open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation for cervical myelopathy in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(7):492–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen HC, Chang MC, Yu WK, Wang ST, Liu CL, Chen TH. Lateral mass anchoring screws for cervical laminoplasty: preliminary report of a novel technique. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(6):387–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Wada M, Imura S. Three-dimensional computed tomography for evaluation of cervical spinal canal enlargement after en bloc open-door laminoplasty. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:674–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Itoh T, Tsuji H. Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine. Spine. 1985;10(8):729–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang HQ, Mak KC, Samartzis D, Wong YW, Luo ZJ, Kang X, et al. “Spring-back” closure associated with open-door cervical laminoplasty. Spine J. 2011;11(9):832–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li A, Wang Q, Gao Y, Yang J, Wang Y, Li XK. Preoperative design of expansive open-door laminoplasty: a computer-assisted morphometric analysis. Comput Aided Surg. 2013;18(5–6):201–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wolf BS, Khilnani M, Malis L. The sagittal diameter of the bony cervical spinal canal and its significance in cervical spondylosis. J Mt Sinai Hosp N Y. 1956;23:283–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine. 2001;26(17):1890–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine. 1988;13(7):870–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K. Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;359:35–48.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu A, Schisterman EF, Wu C. Multistage evaluation of measurement error in a reliability study. Biometrics. 2006;62(4):1190–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K. Flexibility and alignment of the cervical spine after laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy. A radiographic study. Int Orthop. 1995;19(2):116–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.