Open Access

Vancomycin containing PLLA/β-TCP controls experimental osteomyelitis in vivo

  • Berna Kankilic1,
  • Elif Bilgic2,
  • Petek Korkusuz2 and
  • Feza Korkusuz3Email author
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research20149:114

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-014-0114-3

Received: 26 August 2014

Accepted: 31 October 2014

Published: 19 November 2014

Abstract

Background

Implant-related osteomyelitis (IRO) is recently controlled with local antibiotic delivery systems to overcome conventional therapy disadvantages. In vivo evaluation of such systems is however too little.

Questions/purposes

We asked whether vancomycin (V)-containing poly-l-lactic acid/β-tricalcium phosphate (PLLA/β-TCP) composites control experimental IRO and promote bone healing in vivo.

Methods

Fifty-six rats were distributed to five groups in this longitudinal controlled study. Experimental IRO was established at tibiae by injecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) suspensions with titanium particles in 32 rats. Vancomycin-free PLLA/β-TCP composites were implanted into the normal and infected tibiae, whereas V-PLLA/β-TCP composites and coated (C)-V-PLLA/β-TCP composites were implanted into IRO sites. Sham-operated tibiae established the control group. Radiological and histological scores were quantified with microbiological findings on weeks 1 and 6.

Results

IRO is resolved in the CV- and the V-PLLA/β-TCP groups but not in the PLLA/β-TCP group. MRSA was not isolated in the CV- and the V-PLLA/β-TCP groups at all times whereas the bacteria were present in the PLLA/β-TCP group. Radiological signs secondary to infection are improved from 10.9 ± 0.9 to 3.0 ± 0.3 in the V-PLLA/β-TCP group but remained constant in the PLLA/β-TCP group. Histology scores are improved from 24.7 ± 6.5 to 17.6 ± 4.8 and from 27.6 ± 7.9 to 32.4 ± 8.9 in the CV-PLLA/β-TCP and the V-PLLA/β-TCP groups, respectively. New bone was formed in all the PLLA/β-TCP group at weeks 1 and 6.

Conclusions

CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP composites controlled experimental IRO and promoted bone healing.

Clinical relevance

CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP composites have the potential of controlling experimental IRO and promoting bone healing.

Keywords

Bone Osteomyelitis Drug delivery Rat Vancomycin PLLA β-TCP MRSA Infection

Introduction

Implant-related osteomyelitis (IRO) [1] is a complex bone infection that requires the surgical removal of sequester or implant [2] followed with the debridement of the infected tissues [3] and high dosage antibiotic regimen for 6 weeks [4]. Staphylococcus aureus is the main causative organism for osteomyelitis [5]. It can form a biofilm, an extracellular polymeric matrix, in which cells can communicate and protect themselves from antibacterial agents [6]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a strain of S. aureus, which mainly caused nosocomial bone infections [7]. Vancomycin is a frequently used antibiotic against infections caused by MRSA [8]. Local antibiotic delivery systems [9],[10] are proposed to control IRO safely and efficiently as parenteral administration of high doses of vancomycin for long durations may lead to some effects [11].

Although various degradable polymers [12],[13] and β-TCP [14] were used to release antibiotics, in vivo evaluation of these systems was rarely [15],[16] undertaken. A vancomycin-containing poly-l-lactic acid/β-tricalcium phosphate (V-PLLA/β-TCP) composite was recently developed and characterized for this reason [17]. PLLA slowed vancomycin release and β-TCP aided mesenchymal stem and Saos-2 bone cells attachment, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro[17]. This composite was further dip coated (C) with PLLA and 63.1% and 91.9% of the vancomycin released on days 1 and 42, respectively. CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP composites furthermore generated the extracellular bone matrix and attained mineralization that may point out tissue regeneration [17]. In this study, we asked whether CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP composites controlled experimental IRO and promoted bone healing in vivo.

Materials and methods

A longitudinal controlled study in rat tibiae was designed after ethical committee approval. Independent variables were groups (n =5) and time (n =2) and dependent variables were radiological, histological, and microbiological scores. Free online software was used to calculate the sample size of the study. The power 1-beta and type I error rate alpha were set to 0.8% and 5%, respectively. Power analysis with 56 rats revealed 0.81% confidence; therefore, minimum 10 rats were assigned into one of the five experimental groups. In the control group, the tibiae of the rats underwent sham operation without IRO establishment (n =12). PLLA/β-TCP composites were implanted into the non-infected tibiae in the second group (n =12). The PLLA/β-TCP, the V-PLLA/β-TCP, and the CV-PLLA/β-TCP composites were implanted into the IRO-established tibiae (n =12, n =10, and n =10), respectively, in the last three groups (Figure 1). We examined the groups after 1 and 6 weeks and quantified their radiological, histological, and microbiological findings.
Figure 1

The experimental design and study groups are shown. n = number; t = time; IRO = implant-related chronic osteomyelitis.

Composites were developed and characterized as previously described [17]. Briefly, 8% vancomycin solution was prepared with 920 mg deionized water. This solution was mixed with 720 mg β-TCP and dried at 37°C for 12 h. The final mixture was added to 3% PLLA solution that contained 2.67 g chloroform and molded to obtain a spherical shape. MRSA (strain: ATCC 2592) was obtained from the microbiological collection of Ankara Numune Hospital Microbiology Laboratory. We used 3-month-old male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 300–350 g housed in a temperature-controlled room (22°C–24°C) with 12-h light and 12-h dark cycles. Rats were given free access to water and food without antibiotics for 24 h a day. They were anesthetized by intraperitoneal 0.2 mL ketamine chloride (Ketasol 10%, Richter-Pharma, Wels, Austria) and 0.1 mL xylazine (Alfazyne 2%, Alfasan, Woerden, the Netherlands) injection. The left hind limb was shaved and cleaned with iodine solution (Polyod, Drogsan, Ankara, Turkey). The proximal anterior cortex of the tibia was exposed and drilled through with a 3.2-mm burr (Dremel, Gerlingen, Germany). We irrigated the burr hole with 0.09% sodium chloride solution (Eczacıbaşı-Baxter, Istanbul, Turkey) and injected a 0.1 mL MRSA suspension (1 × 106 CFU/cm3) into the intramedullary cavity with approximately 200 1.0 × 1.0-mm titanium particles to establish IRO in the last three groups. The burr hole was closed with bone wax (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) to prevent MRSA from leaking into the subcutaneous soft tissues. A sham operation was undertaken in the control group. Only the tibia was exposed and no other intervention was taken place. For the PLLA/β-TCP implantation, the tibiae were drilled and no MRSA suspension was given. The skin and subcutaneous tissues were sutured with 2.0 silk (Doğsan, Trabzon, Turkey), and closure was cleaned and sprayed with an antibacterial film (Opsite, Smith & Nephew, London, England) [18]. Rats were put into cages allowing their free movement and fed with regular diet. Anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs of the tibia were obtained after 3 weeks in the IRO groups using the Siemens Multix-C (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) X-ray device at a setting of 46 kV and 2.5 mAs/s to confirm radiological signs of IRO establishment. The distance between the X-ray source and the samples was 100.0 cm at examination. Agfa Crurix X-ray films (Agfa, Mortsel, Belgium) and the Crurix 60 (Agfa, Mortsel, Belgium) automatic developing machine were used. When macroscopic and radiologic signs of IRO became definite, all closures were reopened and only one composite implanted into the burr hole was found in the tibia based on its group. After 1 and 6 weeks, radiographs were obtained and two orthopedic surgeons who had no prior information of the groups independently evaluated the radiographs for the presence of IRO. Radiologic criteria were: (1) periosteal reaction, (2) diaphyseal widening, (3) osteolysis, (4) bone deformation, (5) sequestrum formation, (6) joint effusion, and (7) soft tissue swelling. Parameters 1 to 4 were graded as (0) absent, (1) mild, (2) moderate, and (3) severe, and parameters 5 to 7 were graded as (0) absent and (1) present [19]. Swab cultures were obtained for microbiological analysis. A sterile stripe was smeared into the implantation site to take culture. The stripes were streaked onto blood agar plates and incubated at 37°C for 12 h and the presence or absence of growth in the media was recorded. The animals were sacrificed by lethal doses of anesthetics and tibiae of the left hind leg were dissected. All soft tissues were removed and bones were fixed in 10% phosphate buffered formalin (pH 7.0) at room temperature for histological analysis at termination. Samples were then decalcified by immersion in De Castro solution [nitric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), chloral hydrate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and distilled water] for 5–10 days before dehydration. Tibiae were rinsed in buffer and dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol before embedding in paraffin in an automated tissue processor (TP-1020, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). For each tibia, we determined the severity of infection with 60–80 5-μm-thick hematoxylin and eosin and trichrome-stained serial sections using a DMR 6000 microscope equipped with the DC500 digital camera (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Semi-quantitative image analysis was undertaken using the Qwin Plus computer image analysis system (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The medullar cavity (leukocytes, microabscesses, granulation tissue, fibrosis), cortex (destruction of the cortex, enlarged Haversian canals, leukocytes, microabscesses, granulation tissue, fibrosis), and periosteal reaction (quantity) were scored according to the literature [according to severity as none, slight, moderate, or much from 0 to 4] in at least ten regions of interest [20]. The total score was calculated and noted for the statistical analysis.

Descriptive values are expressed as the minimum, the maximum, and the median. As all the scores for the control group were zero, this group was taken off from statistical analysis. Normality of distribution and homogeneity of variances were adjusted using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Radiological and the histological scores were analyzed by nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis for multiple comparison and Mann Whitney U as post hoc test with Bonferroni correction; p <0.0083 was considered significant.). Spearman’s test was used to assess correlations between continuous radiology and histology variables. The Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient test was used for the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities.

Each author certifies that Hacettepe University Animal Care and Use Ethics Committee approved (no. 2007/65-1) the animal protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

Results

MRSA did not grow in the CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP groups at any time. MRSA and Escherichia coli were isolated from four and two of six, and from three and three of six tibiae in the PLLA/β-TCP group at week 1 and 6, respectively. Radiological score of the V-PLLA/β-TCP group improved (p =0.043) at week 6 (Figure 2). Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities (r) for the presence or absence of infection were 0.95 and 0.98, respectively. The radiographic scores correlated with histological scores at weeks 1 (r =0.896; p <0.05) and 6 (r =0.90; p <0.05). Microbiological and radiological scores from this in vivo study suggest that IRO was controlled in the CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP groups but not in the PLLA/β-TCP group.
Figure 2

The descriptive data of radiological scores of the groups are shown for weeks 1 and 6: (minimum, maximum, and median values). V-PLLA/β-TCP with IRO score recruited and PLLA/β-TCP without IRO score regressed on week 6. Note that p <0.0083 for a-c, b-c, d-e, d-f.

PLLA/β-TCP composites implanted into normal bone without IRO presented healthy cortical osteons and minimal or no periosteal reaction histologically, receiving better scores than the other groups at week 1 (Figure 3). PLLA/β-TCP composites with IRO exhibited cortical bone damage with enlarged Haversian canals and granulation tissue formation. Mononuclear cells infiltrated the medullary canal in the same group. Broad periosteal reaction at weeks 1 and 6 were observed in the PLLA/β-TCP groups with IRO. The CV-PLLA/β-TCP group had comparatively better (p =0.004) histological scores compared with that of the PLLA/β-TCP group at week 6 (Figure 4).
Figure 3

The descriptive data of histological scores of the groups are shown for weeks 1 and 6: (minimum, maximum, and median values). PLLA/β-TCP without IRO exhibited better scores than the other groups at weeks 1 and 6. V-PLLA/β-TCP and CV-PLLA/β-TCP presented better scores compared with that of PLLA/β-TCP with IRO at week 6. Note that p <0.0083 for a-b, a-c, a-d, e-f, e-g, e-h.

Figure 4

Histological images (A-E). PLLA/β-TCP without IRO group had a mild tissue reaction in (A) week 1 with HE (B) and week 6 with MT. The implant is degrading but still present at 6 weeks. PLLA/β-TCP with IRO group had evident bone damage and granulation tissue formation with mononuclear cell infiltration and periosteal reaction in (C) week 1 with MT and (D) week 6 with HE, respectively. V-PLLA/β-TCP had better morphologic features of the bone and marrow in (E) week 1 with HE with the presence of new forming healthy spongy bone. CT connective tissue, TB trabecular bone, CB compact bone, BM bone marrow, GT granulation tissue, I implant, HE hematoxylin and eosin, MT Masson’s trichrome.

Discussion

Staphylococcal bacteria have adhesion potential to biomaterials [21] resulting in chronic osteomyelitis and IRO [6]. This bone infection can be controlled with local drug delivery systems. CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP composites can be a choice since remission of IRO was achieved with these implants. This study had some limitations. E. coli was isolated in three PLLA/β-TCP composites, which indicated surgical site contamination. Complex bacterial contamination is a frequent state in osteomyelitis due to the open wounds and/or multiple surgeries [22]; however, CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP composites were able to overcome this complication. In vivo degradation time and reduction of mechanical strength of our material were not measured, as eradication of MRSA was our primary aim.

Microbiologic findings revealed control of the infection in the CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP groups. Bacteria did not grow in these groups at any time. Radiological scores correlated well with histological scores and improvement was achieved in the CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP groups. These findings were in line with previous studies [23],[24]. The radiologic score of the PLLA/β-TCP group without IRO group deteriorated slightly at week 6 most probably due to composite degradation [25]. A decrease in pH owing to PLLA degradation could have caused bone resorption [26] in this group. Histological findings of the CV- and V-PLLA/β-TCP groups presented favorable biocompatibility. TCP is an osteoconductive material [27] and influences bone ingrowth in the pores of the composite. This finding was in line with another study [16] that demonstrated new trabecular bone formation at the defect margins in biodegradable TCP composites. Quantitative histology revealed biocompatibility and osteointegration as in another study [28].

Conclusion

In conclusion, vancomycin-containing PLLA/β-TCP composites presented favorable radiological, histological, and microbiological results of remission and according to clinical relevance of the study, they can be used to control IRO in the near future.

Authors’ contributions

BK and FK carried out the in vivo studies, and drafted the manuscript. PK and EB carried out the histology studies. BK, FK, and PK participated in the design of the study and BK, PK, and EB performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Muharrem Timuçin and Nursen Koç of the Middle East Technical University, Department of Metallurgical and Material Engineering, Ankara, Turkey who produced and provided the β-TCP. We thank Erdal Bayramlı of the Middle East Technical University, Department of Chemistry for his help in producing composites. We also thank Akif Muhtar Öztürk MD and Alparslan Şenköylü MD of the Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey for independently scoring the radiographs. Sezin Dagdeviren of the Middle East Technical University, Department of Biotechnology assisted the surgeries. Çagla Köprü of the Hacettepe University Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine Division helped at the preparation and evaluation of histological specimens. A part of this project was supported by the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology of Turkey, San-Tez Research Grant 00817.STZ.2011-01.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Applied Sciences, Middle East Technical University
(2)
Department of Histology and Embryology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine
(3)
Department of Sports Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine

References

  1. Ozturan KE, Yucel I, Kocoglu E, Cakici H, Guven M: Efficacy of moxifloxacin compared to teicoplanin in the treatment of implant-related chronic osteomyelitis in rats. J Orthop Res. 2010, 28 (10): 1368-1372. 10.1002/jor.21159.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zimmerli W: Infection and musculoskeletal conditions: prosthetic-joint-associated infections. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006, 20 (6): 1045-1063. 10.1016/j.berh.2006.08.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Orhan Z, Cevher E, Yıldız A, Ahıskalı R, Sensoy D, Mülazımoğlu L: Biodegradable microspherical implants containing teicoplanin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010, 130: 135-142. 10.1007/s00402-009-0886-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiang JL, Li YF, Fang TL, Zhou J, Li XL, Wang YC, Dong J: Vancomycin-loaded nano-hydroxyapatite pellets to treat MRSA-induced chronic osteomyelitis with bone defect in rabbits. Inflamm Res. 2012, 61 (3): 207-215. 10.1007/s00011-011-0402-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Li D, Gromov K, Søballe K, Puzas JE, O’Keefe RJ, Awad H, Drissi H, Schwarz EM: Quantitative mouse model of implant-associated osteomyelitis and the kinetics of microbial growth, osteolysis, and humoral immunity. J Orthop Res. 2008, 26 (1): 96-105. 10.1002/jor.20452.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lew DP, Waldvogel FA: Osteomyelitis. Lancet. 2004, 364: 369-379. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16727-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yin LY, Calhoun JH, Thomas JK, Shapiro S, Schmitt-Hoffmann A: Efficacies of ceftobiprole medocaril and comparators in a rabbit model of osteomyelitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52 (5): 1618-1622. 10.1128/AAC.00638-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang T, Wen J, Zhou J, Shao Z, Dong J: Poly (ε-caprolactone) coating delays vancomycin delivery from porous chitosan/β-tricalcium phosphate composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012, 100 (7): 1803-1811. 10.1002/jbm.b.32747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Makarov C, Berdicevsky I, Raz-Pasteur A, Gotman I:In vitro antimicrobial activity of vancomycin-eluting bioresorbable β-TCP-polylactic acid nanocomposite material for load-bearing bone repair. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013, 24 (3): 679-687. 10.1007/s10856-012-4832-y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Park PI, Makoid M, Jonnalagadda S: The design of flexible ciprofloxacin-loaded PLGA implants using a reversed phase separation/coacervation method. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011, 77 (2): 233-239. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.11.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Petrone C, Hall G, Langman M, Filiaggi MJ: Compaction strategies for modifying the drug delivery capabilities of gelled calcium polyphosphate matrices. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4 (2): 403-413. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.09.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ahola N, Männistö N, Veiranto M, Karp M, Rich J, Efimov A, Seppälä J, Kellomäki M: An in vitro study of composites of poly (L-lactide-co-ε-caprolactone), β-tricalcium phosphate and ciprofloxacin intended for local treatment of osteomyelitis. Biomatter. 2013, 3 (2): 1-13. 10.4161/biom.23162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Korkusuz F, Korkusuz P, Ekşioğlu F, Gürsel İ, Hasırcı V:In vivo response to biodegradable controlled antibiotic release systems. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001, 55: 217-228. 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<217::AID-JBM1008>3.0.CO;2-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gbureck U, Vorndran E, Barralet JE: Modeling vancomycin release kinetics from microporous calcium phosphate ceramics comparing static and dynamic immersion conditions. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4: 1480-1486. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.02.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Miyai T, Ito A, Tamazawa G, Matsuno T, Sogo Y, Nakamura C, Yamazaki A, Satoh T: Antibiotic-loaded poly-ε-caprolactone and porous β-tricalcium phosphate composite for treating osteomyelitis. Biomaterials. 2008, 29: 350-358. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Luginbuehl V, Ruffieux K, Hess C, Reichardt D, von Rechenberg B, Nuss K: Controlled release of tetracycline from biodegradable β-tricalcium phosphate composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010, 92B: 341-352.Google Scholar
  17. Kankilic B, Bayramli E, Kilic E, Dağdeviren S, Korkusuz F: Vancomycin containing PLLA/β-TCP controls MRSA in vitro. Clin Ortop Relat Res. 2011, 469: 3222-3228. 10.1007/s11999-011-2082-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Korkusuz F, Uchida A, Shinto Y, Inoue K, Ono K: Biomaterial centered chronic osteomyelitis. Turk J Med Res. 1992, 10: 268-292.Google Scholar
  19. Aktekin CN, Ozturk AM, Tabak AY, Altay M, Korkusuz F: A different perspective for radiological evaluation of experimental osteomyelitis. Skeletal Radiol. 2007, 36: 945-950. 10.1007/s00256-007-0342-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Petty W, Spanier S, Shuster JJ, Silverthorne C: The influence of skeletal implants on incidence of infection: experiment in a canine model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985, 67: 1236-1244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawson MC, Hoth KC, Deforest CA, Bowman CN, Anseth KS: Inhibition of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms using polymerizable vancomycin derivatives. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010, 468 (8): 2081-2091. 10.1007/s11999-010-1266-z.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Klemm K: The use of antibiotic-containing bead chains in the treatment of chronic bone infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001, 7: 28-31. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2001.00186.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ozturk AM, Tabak AY, Aktekin CN, Altay M, Erdemli E, Karahuseyinoglu S, Korkusuz F: Alendronate enhances antibiotic-impregnated bone grafts in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Int Orthop. 2008, 32: 821-827. 10.1007/s00264-007-0396-8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucke M, Schmidmaier G, Sadoni S, Wildemann B, Schiller R, Haas NP: Gentamicin coating of metallic implants reduces implant-related osteomyelitis in rats. Bone. 2003, 32 (5): 521-531. 10.1016/S8756-3282(03)00050-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pihlajamäki H, Böstman O, Tynninen O, Laitinen O: Long-term tissue response to bioabsorbable poly-l-lactide and metallic screws: an experimental study. Bone. 2006, 39: 932-937. 10.1016/j.bone.2006.04.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cao L, Duan PG, Wang HR, Li XL, Yuan FL, Fan ZY, Li SM, Dong J: Degradation and osteogenic potential of a novel poly (lactic acid)/nano-sized β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012, 7: 5881-5888. 10.2147/IJN.S38127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Soundrapandian C, Sa B, Datta S: Organic-inorganic composites for bone drug delivery. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009, 10 (4): 1158-1171. 10.1208/s12249-009-9308-0.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Baro M, Sanchez E, Delgado A, Perera A, Evora C:In vitro-in vivo characterization of gentamicin bone implants. J Control Release. 2002, 83: 353-364. 10.1016/S0168-3659(02)00179-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kankilic et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.