Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Systematic Review
  • Open access
  • Published:

Surgical management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: evidence-based guidelines

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research volume 19, Article number: 132 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures (CATR) often require surgical intervention to restore function. Despite numerous treatment modalities available, the optimal management strategy remains controversial given the limited high-quality evidence available. This article aims to provide evidence-based guidelines for the surgical management of CATR through a comprehensive systematic review of the available data. The consensus reached by synthesizing the findings will assist clinicians in making informed decisions and improving patient outcomes.

Methods

A group of 9 foot surgeons in three continents was consulted to gather their expertise on guidelines regarding the surgical management of CATR. Following the proposal of 9 clinical topics, a thorough and comprehensive search of relevant literature published since 1980 was conducted for each topic using electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant studies published until 1 October 2023. All authors collaborated in drafting, discussing, and finalizing the recommendations and statements. The recommendations were then categorized into two grades: grade a (strong) and grade b (weak), following the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) concept. Additionally, feedback from 21 external specialists, who were independent from the authors, was taken into account to further refine and finalize the clinical guidelines.

Results

Nine statements and guidelines were completed regarding surgical indications, surgical strategies, and postoperative rehabilitation protocol.

Conclusion

Based on the findings of the systematic review, this guideline provides recommendations for the surgical management of CATR. We are confident that this guideline will serve as a valuable resource for physicians when making decisions regarding the surgical treatment of patients with CATR.

Introduction

The Achilles tendon is the largest and strongest tendon in the human body, connecting the muscles of the gastrosoleus complex to the calcaneus [1]. The Achilles tendon is important to maintain the standing posture, and during walking, running, and jumping [2, 3]. Tears of the Achilles tendon are classified as chronic after a four- or six-week period following the initial injury[4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture (CATR) report weakness, instability, increased dorsiflexion of the ankle, swelling, tenderness, and thickening of the tendon, and, at times, persistent pain [11,12,13,14,15,16,17].

In the 1970s, surgical interventions for Achilles tendon ailments gained popularity as they offered better outcomes and lower re-rupture rates compared to non-surgical methods [18,19,20]. The traditional surgical technique involved an open repair, where the surgeon made an incision to directly access the ruptured tendon and suture it back together [21,22,23]. This approach showed good clinical and functional outcomes, but it often required a relatively large incision, and resulted in increased scar tissue formation[24, 25]. Minimally invasive [26,27,28] and percutaneous techniques have emerged as an alternative to open repair [29,30,31,32,33]. These techniques reduce surgical trauma, minimize scarring, and allow faster recovery. Advances in surgical techniques have further refined the management of CATR. The use of endoscopic or arthroscopic methods has gained popularity, enabling surgeons to visualize and repair the tendon through smaller incisions [34,35,36,37]. These minimally invasive procedures offer advantages such as reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and improved cosmetic outcomes [37,38,39]. Overall, the history of surgical management for CATR has witnessed a shift toward less invasive techniques, improved surgical outcomes, and the exploration of regenerative therapies [40, 41].

Currently, the treatment of CATR is highly challenging, with many techniques and marked variations in treatment methods [42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. There are also considerable differences among various surgical approaches, and consensus has not yet been reached [49,50,51,52,53,54]. Therefore, to further provide a reference for clinicians in selecting surgical methods for CATR, we have formulated this guideline through expert consultations and critical structured analysis of the published peer-reviewed literature. This guideline aims to comprehensively summarize the current research achievements and provide the most valuable information for the clinical practice of surgical treating CATR.

Methods

The current guideline is intended for patients aged 16 and 60 years with CATR.

Basic overview of the procedure

The process began in January 2023. Nine orthopedic surgeons were consulted to gather their expertise and insights on guidelines concerning the surgical management of CATR. A total of 9 topics were proposed, covering surgical indications, surgical strategies, and postoperative rehabilitation protocols. For each topic, comprehensive systematic searches were conducted in the literature published since 1980. Based on the findings, a draft of the guideline statement outlining the recommendations was prepared. The draft of the guideline statement was thoroughly reviewed, modified, and finalized by all the authors listed in this consensus statement. A consensus meeting was held in May 2023, when the evidence level and grading of the recommendations were determined. During the meeting, 21 specialist surgeons, all experienced in the treatment of CATR, engaged in discussions and modifications until a 70% agreement was achieved. These specialist surgeons were academic and non-academic orthopedics with at least 10 years of post-fellowship independent practice, of consultant status, who practiced in hospital where at least 5 chronic Achilles tendon ruptures per year were managed (range 5–18).

Method of systematic literature review

A systematic review of each topic was conducted using electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, to identify relevant studies published until 1 October 2023. The search utilized specific terms related to each topic, combined with the terms " Chronic Achilles Tendon Rupture ", “old Achilles Tendon Rupture”, “neglected Achilles Tendon Rupture”, or " Chronic Rupture of Achilles Tendon ". The inclusion criteria focused on studies that reported risk–benefit outcomes for each topic, while non-clinical studies, reviews, and study protocols were excluded. To provide a concise overview of the findings from the studies included, the researchers evaluated the design of each study and assessed the potential for bias using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The latter is specifically designed to assess non-randomized studies. The results of the literature search are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of the literature search

Full size image

Determination of evidence level and grading of recommendations

The determination of recommendation grades followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach [55], which categorizes evidence levels according to different study types. Well-conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or high-quality systematic reviews of RCT were classified as high-quality evidence (A), while observational studies (lesser quality RCTs or strong evidence from observational studies) were regarded as having a moderate-quality evidence (B). RCTs with significant limitations, or evidence from observational studies with a high risk of bias, or cohort studies were classified as low-quality evidence (C). Case reports and expert opinions were considered to have the very low-quality evidence (D).

GRADE assigns recommendations into two categories:

  1. a.

    Strong recommendation: This indicates that the desirable effects of an intervention clearly outweigh the undesirable effects (or vice versa) for most patients. Most individuals would choose the recommended intervention.

  2. b.

    Weak recommendation: This indicates that the desirable effects of an intervention likely outweigh the undesirable effects (or vice versa) for most patients, but the balance may vary depending on individual circumstances or patient preferences.

The strength of the recommendation is based on several factors, including the quality of evidence, the balance between benefits and harms, values and preferences, costs, feasibility, and resource implications. Hence, a recommendation grade of aA signifies strong and high-quality evidence, while a grade of bD indicates weak and very low-quality evidence.

Results and discussion

What are the indications for surgical treatment of CATR?

Recommendation. In (1) patients exhibit functional impairment (i.e., pain, inability to perform a single heel rise, disability in walking and climbing stars) after 6 months of conservative management; (2) athletes or active individuals; (3) physical examination reveals positive calf squeeze and knee flexion tests; (4) MRI or ultrasound scans confirmed CATR, a surgical management is indicated. (aC).

Statement. No investigations related to the surgical indications for CATR or a comparison between surgical and conservative treatments for CATR were identified. However, studies focusing on the surgical management of CATR were reviewed, specifically those with evidence levels A to D. The researchers carefully analyzed the inclusion criteria of the identified studies to observe and determine the surgical indications for CATR. Following the above search strategy, 16 studies were included [33, 56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70], of which 1 study was grade A [56], 1 study was grade B [57], 6 studies were grade C [33, 58,59,60,61,62], and 8 studies were grade D [63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70]. The most common conditions for which surgical management is indicated were CATR patients exhibiting signs of functional limitation, such as pain or tenderness, inability to execute a single heel raise, or repetitive single-leg heel raise endurance exercises, as well as difficulty in walking and ascending stairs, along with ankle swelling; these symptoms were accompanied by positive results in the call squeeze and knee flexion [71], and their diagnoses were confirmed through MRI or ultrasound examinations (16 studies). Across all the studies, it was evident that preoperative imaging tests were routinely obtained, signifying that surgical judgments should rely on the corresponding imaging outcomes, with ultrasound and MRI being the most frequently employed supplementary examinations. In 3 studies [61, 69, 70], patients received conservative treatment for a period of 6 months before undergoing surgery, which included physical therapy and the use of anti-inflammatory medications. In the future, controlled studies comparing non-surgical and surgical treatments for CATR will be necessary to more conclusively establish surgical criteria. However, the ethics behind performing such studies involving non-surgical options are challenging, given the present evidence which suggests that surgery is associated with better outcomes [21, 23, 25, 26]. The generalities, patient characteristics, and main findings of the included studies are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Generalities, patient characteristics, and main results of the included studies
Full size table

Is it possible to primary repair the stump of the CATR?

Recommendation. When the defect of the two stumps of the CATR is no more than 2 cm, primary repair after refreshed the tendon edges can be attempted (aD).

Statement. Direct repair of the stump of the CATR in end-to-end fashion would be an ideal option. However, owing to the tendon adhesions and atrophy of the gastrocnemius, suture the stumps of the CATR makes great challenging. Although according to the Myerson’s classification [72] and Kuwada’s classification [73], a tendon defect of 2 to 3 cm could be managed with end-to-end repair, the results of these guidelines have not been assessed in a scientific fashion, even by the authors reporting them. In extreme dorsiflexion, although some defects can be directly sutured, this will increase the tension on the tendons, prolonging the postoperative recovery time and mobilization [40, 44]. When the defect is minimal, primary repair has the advantage of preserving the patient's native tissue and restoring the original anatomy of the Achilles tendon. It can potentially lead to faster healing and recovery, as well as reducing the need for more complex procedures like tendon flap or tendon grafting [74, 75]. We stress, however, that no comparative study has been performed, and that, given the atrophic nature of the tendon stumps in CATR, it does make sense to use grafts to bring new vital tissue to the chronic rupture site.

When should tendon flaps be used?

Recommendation. V‐Y advancement tendon flap is a safe and reliable strategy for CATR with the gap less than 5 cm. Local fascial turndown flaps can be used for an anatomic repair of CATR with a large gap more than 5 cm. Large scar, calf atrophy and reduction of tendon strength are the major drawbacks. (aC).

Statement. Lin et al. [76] employed V‐Y tendon plasty on 20 patients with CATR who had a tendon gap of 5 cm (ranging from 4 to 9 cm). The study reported a significant improvement in AOFAS and ATRS scores (P < 0.001) after a follow-up period of 32.8 months. However, isokinetic strength analysis was not performed. Guclu et al. [77] performed a study on 17 patients with CATR who underwent V–Y tendon plasty with a fascial turndown flap following a debridement procedure for an average 6 cm Achilles tendon defect (ranging from 4.5 to 8 cm). Patients experienced a significant reduction in plantarflexion peak torque at both 30 and 120 degrees, which was attributed to gastrocnemius recession and correlated with the size of the tendon defect. Additionally, the mean calf atrophy measured 3.4 cm (with a range of 1–6 cm) after an average follow-up period of 195 months. Raju et al. [63] presented a study on 12 CATR patients with a tendon gap exceeding 8 cm, where they utilized a gastrosoleus turndown flap along with V–Y plasty. After an average follow-up period of 34 months, the major limitations observed were a preoperative calf diameter loss of 3.4 cm and a noticeable decline in plantar flexion strength on the affected side. Studies involving larger sample sizes and a prospective study design are desirable [78].

When should tendon Transfer be used?

Recommendation. When the defect is between 3 and 6 cm, a local tendon transfer [peroneus brevis tendon transfer or flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer] procedure should be taken into consideration. (aC).

Statement. Peroneus brevis tendon transfer and FHL tendon transfer can effectively reconstruct the Achilles tendon defect less than 6 cm without considerable tension [79]. They reduce the necessity for extensive soft tissue procedures such as turn down flaps or V–Y plasty [80, 81]. Biomechanically, the peroneus brevis tendon exhibits increased load to failure compared to the tendon of FHL. The current evidence suggests that individuals who undergo peroneus brevis tendon transfer experience a more gradual return to sports in comparison with those who undergo FHL transfer [56, 82, 83]. It should be noted that peroneus brevis tendon transfer results in most patients regaining their ability to engage in preinjury sports and daily activities [84]. The operated ankle may have lower peak torque and eversion strength compared to the unaffected limb, although such difference, though statistically significant, are of dubious clinical significance [85]. Maffulli et al. [86] employed peroneus brevis tendon transfer to reconstruct the CATR with the defect of 4.0 to 6.5 cm in 16 patients. At the 15.5-year review, the patients retained good functional outcomes. However, permanently impaired ankle plantar flexion strength and decreased calf circumference are the major complications. Peroneus brevis tendon transfer is viable to enable recreational athletes and non-athletes to resume their sports activities, but it may not be the appropriate solution for young competitive athletes [87, 88]. Patients who underwent FHL transfer experienced significant satisfaction without any impact on the function of their hallux [57, 89,90,91]. On the other hand, patients who underwent open FHL transfer retained nearly normal maximum strength but exhibited reduced endurance compared to the unaffected limb [92,93,94,95,96]. Additional augmentation following FHL transfer did not show statistically significant results [97, 98]. Further augmentation following FHL transfer did not produce any further positive effects and is not warranted.

Peroneus Brevis Tendon transfer versus FHL transfer-which is better?

Recommendation. Patients undergoing either procedure could receive comparable long-term functional results (aC).

Statement. No study comparing the two techniques was found to provide conclusive evidence of one method having a clear advantage over the other. Maffulli et al. [56] conducted a comparison between peroneus brevis tendon transfer (n = 20) and FHL transfer (n = 21) in CATR patients with a gap of less than 6 cm. Patients who underwent peroneus brevis tendon transfer had a delayed return to sports but a higher likelihood of resuming high impact sports when compared to those who received the FHL transfer. According to Maffulli et al. [79, 86, 99] and other researchers [84, 100,101,102,103,104] there was a reported improvement in Achilles tendon total rupture score and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS) following peroneus brevis tendon transfer. An additional 20 studies [97, 105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123] reported comparable outcomes regarding the Achilles tendon total rupture score and AOFAS after performing the open FHL Transfer. Patients undergoing either peroneus brevis tendon transfer or FHL transfer can anticipate experiencing similar functional outcomes.

No significant functional deficit has been documented, and although a statistically significant loss in peroneus brevis strength has been reported, patients do not report any increase in episode of lateral ankle instability [124]. The use of peroneus brevis tendon transfer is therefore to be considered a suitable tendon transfer option in selected patients.

Open versus endoscopic FHL transfer procedure for CATR-which is better?

Recommendation. Patients undergoing either procedure could receive comparable long-term functional results (bC).

Statement. Currently, there is no available comparative study examining the differences between open and arthroscopic FHL transfer for CATR.

The use of flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon transfer presents a suitable option to restore continuity in CATR patients with excellent results [105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115, 122, 125,126,127,128,129]. Notably, certain researchers have recently presented endoscopic approaches for the transfer of FHL. A total of 22 patients with CATR underwent endoscopic FHL Transfer, and the average follow-up period was 30.5 months [66]. The AOFAS score improved from 55 before the operation (with a range of 26–75) to 91 (with a range of 74–100) postoperatively. Additionally, all patients successfully resumed their daily activities without any complications or difficulties. A systematic review [130] found that endoscopic FHL transfer resulted in reduced complications compared to open FHL reconstruction, while still achieving favorable clinical outcomes and allowing patients to return to their preinjury activity levels. Despite the appealing advantages of this technique as a minimally invasive procedure, the surgeon remains vigilant about the potential complications [129]. In the study by Zou et al. [65], 19 patients with CATR underwent endoscopic FHL transfer, and they were followed up for an average of 31 months. The Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score and AOFAS scores showed significant improvement, increasing from 23.3 ± 10.3 and 52.1 ± 12.4 to 98.3 ± 9.2 and 97.5 ± 18.9, respectively. Notably, 12 relatively young patients were able to achieve a return to their preinjury activity levels. Nevertheless, given the lack of comparability in sample sizes between the groups, further studies are required to reach a definitive conclusion [131].

When should free tendon graft be used?

Recommendation. Free tendon graft would be recommended if the gap of the CATR is larger than 6 cm (aC).

Statement. While the FHL transfer and gastrosoleus turndown flap techniques have been employed in patients with CATR involving gaps exceeding 6 cm, the utilization of free tendon grafts was more prevalent [37, 69, 132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141]. In CATR patients in whom the gap between the stumps was greater than 6 cm, Maffulli et al. [142, 143] employed free grafts from the gracilis tendon for the reconstruction procedure. In the cohort of 15 patients, an average follow-up of 10.9 years revealed sustained positive functional outcomes, despite enduring limitations in ankle plantar flexion strength and reduced calf circumference [142]. Performing minimally invasive reconstruction of the Achilles tendon in patients with a gap exceeding 6 cm, utilizing a free graft from the ipsilateral semitendinosus tendon, leads to notable improvement of symptoms and enhancement function [144,145,146,147,148,149]. However, patients should be advised that full recovery of calf circumference and ankle plantarflexion strength is unlikely to be achieved [145]. Nilsson et al. [150] conducted endoscopic reconstruction using ipsilateral semitendinosus autografts in the management of CATR, with favorable results in a cohort of 22 patients. In a series of 15 CATR patients who underwent endoscopic-assisted reconstruction using autografts from the hamstring muscles [151], isokinetic testing at a two-year follow-up revealed a minor and statistically not significant difference in strength between the affected and unaffected sides. While the use of tendon allograft to patients with CATR has yielded favorable clinical outcomes, their effectiveness necessitates further validation and confirmation [152,153,154,155,156,157,158].

When to start range of motion and weight bearing?

Recommendation. Early range of motion of the knee and toes is advised to avoid the limitations of joint immobility. Patient can be encouraged to bear as much weight as possible on the second day after surgery aided by below-the-knee cast and elbow crutches. Two weeks post-surgery, patients can be granted clearance for full weight bearing while keeping the Aircast boot in place. (aC).

Statement. No study specifically addresses the issue of postoperative care after surgical treatment of CATR. In general, early functional treatment yielded superior subjective outcomes while displaying no increased re-rupture rates compared to postoperative immobilization [40, 159, 160]. Immediate loading and ankle motion led to improved overall health and vitality at six month postoperatively [161]. Patients were advised to engage in active knee and toe flexion and extension, along with isometric calf muscle exercises and straight-leg raises [162, 163]. Early weight bearing and immediate functional rehabilitation following surgical treatment for CATR appears to improve long-term functional results, including the ability to resume work [164,165,166,167,168]. A below-knee cast was prescribed for the first 2 weeks following the surgery, and patients were allowed to bear weight on the metatarsal heads during this period if they could tolerate it [79, 99, 124, 139, 143,144,145, 148]. The Aircast walking boot could be employed to support early full weight bearing for the following six weeks [169]. Subsequently, the boot was taken off, and patients were allowed to walk with full weight bearing after 8 weeks.

When to return to sports?

Recommendation. Resuming regular sports activities should not occur earlier than 12 weeks post-surgery, and engaging in strenuous sports should be postponed for a minimum of 12 months. (aC).

Statement. A recent meta-analysis, drawing data from 15 studies, revealed that the rate of return to play stood at 76% among professional athletes, with an average time to return to sports of 11 months [170]. These findings align with the return to sports rate of 80% reported in Zellers and colleagues' comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, which encompassed 85 studies [171]. Usuelli et al. [172] studied 8 patients with CATR who underwent a semitendinosus tendon graft transfer. Six of these 8 patients successfully resumed their preinjury sports activities, achieving this milestone at an average of 7.0 months. The rate of athletes returning to sport after experiencing a CATR still stands at 80%. However, it remains challenging for them to reach their baseline performance levels until 2 to 3 years following surgery, which can have a significant impact on an athlete's overall career [173,174,175,176,177].

Conclusion

This guideline outlines the prevailing surgical approaches for CATR presently. It aims to offer surgeons valuable insights to inform their surgical decisions for CATR patients based on the available evidence. Additionally, we expect that this guideline will offer valuable insights for orthopedic researchers as they formulate future study methodologies, taking into account the current understanding of surgical treatment for CATR.

The main recommendations are outlined as follows:

  1. 1.

    Surgery is recommended for patients who still experience CATR symptoms despite unsuccessful conservative treatment and show signs of CATR on both physical and imaging evaluations.

  2. 2.

    Primary repair procedures are recommended in CATR patients when the defect is no more than 2 cm

  3. 3.

    V‐Y advancement tendon flap is recommended for CATR patients with the gap less than 5 cm; Fascial turndown flap is available for the patients with CATR when the gap more than 5 cm. However, these techniques produce large wounds and have a respective impact on the biomechanics of the gastrocnemius-Achilles tendon complex.

  4. 4.

    Tendon transfer procedures, such as the Peroneus Brevis Tendon Transfer and FHL Transfer, are advisable to address gaps ranging from 3 to 6 cm in patients with CATR.

  5. 5.

    Both open and endoscopic FHL transfer techniques are suitable for CATR patients undergoing tendon transfer procedures.

  6. 6.

    Free tendon graft procedures are recommended for CATR patients with the gap more than 6 cm.

  7. 7.

    Early range of motion of the knee and toes, along with weight-bearing support from a below-the-knee cast and elbow crutches starting on the second day after CATR surgery are recommended; full-weight bearing in suitable orthosis is recommended 2 weeks postoperatively.

  8. 8.

    For CATR patients, return to regular sports would be recommended 12 weeks post-surgery, and return to strenuous sports is recommended 12 months after the surgery.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available from the co-corresponding authors following reasonable requests.

References

  1. O’Brien M. The anatomy of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10:225–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Finni T, Vanwanseele B. Towards modern understanding of the Achilles tendon properties in human movement research. J Biomech. 2023;152: 111583.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson J, Baravarian B. Acute and chronic Achilles tendon ruptures in athletes. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2011;28:117–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Maffulli N, Via AG, Oliva F. Chronic Achilles Tendon rupture. Open Orthop J. 2017;11:660–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Maffulli N, Ajis A, Longo UG, Denaro V. Chronic rupture of tendo Achillis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2007;12:583–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mann RA, Holmes GB Jr, Seale KS, Collins DN. Chronic rupture of the Achilles tendon: a new technique of repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:214–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kissel CG, Blacklidge DK, Crowley DL. Repair of neglected Achilles tendon ruptures–procedure and functional results. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994;33:46–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gabel S, Manoli A 2nd. Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:512–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Den Hartog BD. Surgical strategies: delayed diagnosis or neglected achilles’ tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:456–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fotiadis E, Chatzisimeon A, Samoladas E, Antonarakos P, Akritopoulos P, Akritopoulou K. A Combined repair technique for early neglected achilles tendon ruptures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2008;34:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yasuda T, Kinoshita M, Okuda R. Reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon rupture with the use of interposed tissue between the stumps. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:582–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murakoshi K, Momohara S, Ikari K, et al. Neglected spontaneous rupture of the Achilles’ tendon in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Mod Rheumatol. 2006;16:324–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Costa ML, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Thomas TL. Shock wave therapy for chronic Achilles tendon pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:199–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leslie HD, Edwards WH. Neglected ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2005;10:357–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lüthje P, Nurmi I, Nyyssönen T. Missed Achilles tendon rupture due to oral levofloxacin: surgical treatment and result. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:124–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nilsson N, Nilsson Helander K, Hamrin Senorski E, et al. The economic cost and patient-reported outcomes of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures. J Exp Orthop. 2020;7:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordenholm A, Nilsson N, Senorski EH, Helander KN, Westin O, Olsson N. Patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture have persistent limitations in patient-reported function and calf muscle function one year after surgical treatment - a case series. J Exp Orthop. 2022;9:15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fox JM, Blazina ME, Jobe FW, et al. Degeneration and rupture of the Achilles tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975;107:221–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abraham E, Pankovich AM. Neglected rupture of the achilles tendon. Treatment by V-Y tendinous flap. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:253–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parker RG, Repinecz M. Neglected rupture of the achilles tendon. Treatment by modified Strayer gastrocnemius recession. J Am Podiatry Assoc. 1979;69:548–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tarczyńska M, Szubstarski M, Gawęda K, Przybylski P, Czekajska-Chehab E. Outcomes of open repair treatment for acute versus chronic Achilles tendon ruptures: long-term retrospective follow-up of a minimum 10 years-a pilot study. Med Sci (Basel). 2023;11:25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rush JH. Operative repair of neglected rupture of the tendo Achillis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1980;50:420–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ding H, Xu Y, Li J, Yue K. Comparison of the curative effect of modified medial arc incision of achilles tendon and traditional straight incision in the treatment of old achilles tendon rupture. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2020;33:1087–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. van Maele M, Misselyn D, Metsemakers WJ, Sermon A, Nijs S, Hoekstra H. Is open acute Achilles tendon rupture repair still justified? A single center experience and critical appraisal of the literature. Injury. 2018;49:1947–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saxena A, Maffulli N, Nguyen A, Li A. Wound complications from surgeries pertaining to the Achilles tendon: an analysis of 219 surgeries. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008;98:95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Oliva F, Ronga M, Denaro V. Minimally invasive surgery of the achilles tendon. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:491–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hunt KJ, Budny AM, Maffulli N. Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014;7:199–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Spiezia F, Denaro V. Minimally invasive surgery for Achilles tendon pathologies. Open Access J Sports Med. 2010;1:95–103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Bashir A, Parry MA, Bhat AA. Functional outcome in percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Indian J Orthop. 2023;57:917–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin KD, Crouser NJ, Khan IA. Minimally invasive mid-substance Achilles tendon repair using the percutaneous Achilles repair system (PARS). JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022;12:e21.00050.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kosanović M, Brilej D. Chronic rupture of Achilles tendon: is the percutaneous suture technique effective? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:211–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bertelli R, Gaiani L, Palmonari M. Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon treated with a percutaneous technique. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;15:169–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hammad ME, Fayed AM, Ayoub MA, Emran AM. Early satisfactory results of percutaneous repair in neglected achilles tendon rupture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24:446.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lui TH. Arthroscopy and endoscopy of the foot and ankle: indications for new techniques. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:889–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gossage W, Kohls-Gatzoulis J, Solan M. Endoscopic assisted repair of chronic achilles tendon rupture with flexor hallucis longus augmentation. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:343–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Husebye EE, Molund M, Hvaal KH, Stødle AH. Endoscopic transfer of flexor hallucis longus tendon for chronic Achilles tendon rupture: technical aspects and short-time experiences. Foot Ankle Spec. 2018;11:461–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Malagelada F, Clark C, Dega R. Management of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures-A review. Foot (Edinb). 2016;28:54–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lui TH. Endoscopic assisted flexor hallucis tendon transfer in the management of chronic rupture of Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1163–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lui TH. A minimally invasive “overwrapping” technique for repairing neglected ruptures of the Achilles tendon. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53:806–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Badalihan A, Aihemaiti A, Shawutali N, et al. Outcome of a one-stage tensile stress surgical technique and early postoperative rehabilitation in the treatment of neglected achilles tendon rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:153–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bąkowski P, Ciemniewska-Gorzela K, Talaśka K, et al. Minimally invasive reconstruction technique for chronic Achilles tendon tears allows rapid return to walking and leads to good functional recovery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hadi M, Young J, Cooper L, Costa M, Maffulli N. Surgical management of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon remains unclear: a systematic review of the management options. Br Med Bull. 2013;108:95–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nilsson-Helander K, Swärd L, Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J. A new surgical method to treat chronic ruptures and reruptures of the Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:614–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jacob KM, Paterson R. Surgical repair followed by functional rehabilitation for acute and chronic achilles tendon injuries: excellent functional results, patient satisfaction and no reruptures. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77:287–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. McClelland D, Maffulli N. Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon: reconstruction with peroneus brevis tendon transfer. Surgeon. 2004;2:209–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jennings AG, Sefton GK. Chronic rupture of tendo Achillis. Long-term results of operative management using polyester tape. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:361–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mendicino SS, Reed TS. Repair of neglected Achilles tendon ruptures with a triceps surae muscle tendon advancement. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35:13–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Elias I, Besser M, Nazarian LN, Raikin SM. Reconstruction for missed or neglected Achilles tendon rupture with V-Y lengthening and flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer through one incision. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:1238–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lee DK. Achilles tendon repair with acellular tissue graft augmentation in neglected ruptures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46:451–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee YS, Lin CC, Chen CN, Chen SH, Liao WY, Huang CR. Reconstruction for neglected Achilles tendon rupture: the modified Bosworth technique. Orthopedics. 2005;28:647–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wapner KL, Hecht PJ, Mills RH Jr. Reconstruction of neglected Achilles tendon injury. Orthop Clin North Am. 1995;26:249–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bevilacqua NJ. Treatment of the neglected Achilles tendon rupture. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012;29:291–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Park YS, Sung KS. Surgical reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon ruptures using various methods. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e213–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Padanilam TG. Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2009;14:711–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Maffulli N, Oliva F, Maffulli GD, Buono AD, Gougoulias N. Surgical management of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures using less invasive techniques. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24:164–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Abubeih H, Khaled M, Saleh WR, Said GZ. Flexor hallucis longus transfer clinical outcome through a single incision for chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Int Orthop. 2018;42:2699–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Jiménez-Carrasco C, Ammari-Sánchez-Villanueva F, Prada-Chamorro E, García-Guirao AJ, Tejero S. Allograft and autologous reconstruction techniques for neglected Achilles tendon rupture: a mid-long-term follow-up analysis. J Clin Med. 2023;12:1135.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Xu T, Liu X, Tian J, et al. Endoscopic-assisted locking block modified Krackow technique combined with a V-Y flap for chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ma Y, Meng X, Su Y, Yan Z, Shao Q, Chen Y. Evaluation of a modified spoon-shaped medial incision in the surgical repair of a chronic Achilles tendon rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;60:729–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Arriaza R, Arriaza Á, López-Vidriero E, Gayoso R, Agrasar C, Saavedra-Garcia MA. Quadriceps tendon autograft and platelet rich plasma injection to treat chronic Achilles tears-a minimum two-year follow-up. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:746.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Lin Y, Yang L, Yin L, Duan X. Surgical strategy for the chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1416971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Raju S, Singhi PK, Somashekar V, Ajari A, Chidambaram M. Long-term outcomes of gastrocnemius V-Y plasty gastrosoleus fascial turndown flap for chronic tendo-achilles injuries with complex gap (Kuwada Type IV Injuries). Indian J Orthop. 2021;56:421–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Tsukada K, Yasui Y, Kubo M, et al. Operative outcome of side-locking loop suture technique accompanied by autologous semitendinosus tendon grafting for chronic rupture of Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021;6:24730114211003540.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Zou Y, Li X, Wang L, Tan C, Zhu Y. Endoscopically assisted, minimally invasive reconstruction for chronic Achilles tendon rupture with a double-bundle flexor hallucis longus. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9:2325967120979990.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Vega J, Vilá J, Batista J, Malagelada F, Dalmau-Pastor M. Endoscopic flexor hallucis longus transfer for chronic noninsertional Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39:1464–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lever CJ, Bosman HA, Robinson AHN. The functional and dynamometer-tested results of transtendinous flexor hallucis longus transfer for neglected ruptures of the Achilles tendon at six years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B:584–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Maffulli N, Ajis A. Management of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1348–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Maffulli N, Via AG, Oliva F. Chronic Achilles tendon disorders: tendinopathy and chronic rupture. Clin Sports Med. 2015;34:607–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. de Cesar NC, Chinanuvathana A, Fonseca LFD, Dein EJ, Tan EW, Schon LC. Outcomes of flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon transfer in the treatment of Achilles tendon disorders. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25:303–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Villarreal AD, Andersen CR, Panchbhavi VK. A survey on management of chronic achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2012;41:126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Myerson MS. Achilles tendon ruptures. Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:219–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kuwada GT. Classification of tendo Achillis rupture with consideration of surgical repair techniques. J Foot Surg. 1990;29:361–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Maffulli N. Rupture of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1019–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Yasuda T, Shima H, Mori K, Kizawa M, Neo M. Direct repair of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures using scar tissue located between the tendon stumps. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:1168–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lin YJ, Duan XJ, Yang L. V-Y tendon plasty for reconstruction of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: a medium-term and long-term follow-up. Orthop Surg. 2019;11:109–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Guclu B, Basat HC, Yildirim T, Bozduman O, Us AK. Long-term results of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures repaired With V-Y tendon plasty and fascia turndown. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37:737–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Kopp L, Kunc V. Acute and chronic Achilles tendon ruptures - current diagnostic and therapeutic options. Rozhl Chir. 2021;100:376–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Maffulli N, Spiezia F, Longo UG, Denaro V. Less-invasive reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon ruptures using a peroneus brevis tendon transfer. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:2304–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Pendse A, Kankate R. Reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon ruptures in elderly patients, with vascularized flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer using single incision technique. Acta Orthop Belg. 2019;85:137–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Berlet GC, Lee TH. Flexor hallucis tendon transfer with an interference screw for chronic Achilles tendinosis: a report of 62 cases. Foot Ankle Spec. 2008;1:280–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gamal O, Shams A, Mesregah MK. Augmented repair of acute total Achilles tendon rupture with peroneus brevis tendon transfer using oblique transosseous calcaneal tunnel: a prospective case series. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;60:923–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sebastian H, Datta B, Maffulli N, Neil M, Walsh WR. Mechanical properties of reconstructed achilles tendon with transfer of peroneus brevis or flexor hallucis longus tendon. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46:424–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Miskulin M, Miskulin A, Klobucar H, Kuvalja S. Neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon treated with peroneus brevis transfer: a functional assessment of 5 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44:49–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Tawari AA, Dhamangaonkar AA, Goregaonkar AB, Chhapan JB. Augmented repair of degenerative tears of tendo achilles using peroneus brevis tendon: early results. Malays Orthop J. 2013;7:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Maffulli N, Spiezia F, Pintore E, et al. Peroneus brevis tendon transfer for reconstruction of chronic tears of the Achilles tendon: a long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:901–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Gallant GG, Massie C, Turco VJ. Assessment of eversion and plantar flexion strength after repair of Achilles tendon rupture using peroneus brevis tendon transfer. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995;24:257–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Pintore E, Barra V, Pintore R, Maffulli N. Peroneus brevis tendon transfer in neglected tears of the Achilles tendon. J Trauma. 2001;50:71–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Tay D, Lin HA, Tan BS, Chong KW, Rikhraj IS. Chronic Achilles tendon rupture treated with two turndown flaps and flexor hallucis longus augmentation - two-year clinical outcome. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2010;39:58–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Elgohary HEA, Elmoghazy NA, Abd Ellatif MS. Combined flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer and gastrocnemius recession for reconstruction of gapped chronic achilles tendon ruptures. Injury. 2016;47:2833–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Richardson DR, Willers J, Cohen BE, Davis WH, Jones CP, Anderson RB. Evaluation of the hallux morbidity of single-incision flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:627–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Oksanen MM, Haapasalo HH, Elo PP, Laine HJ. Hypertrophy of the flexor hallucis longus muscle after tendon transfer in patients with chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;20:253–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Yeoman TF, Brown MJ, Pillai A. Early post-operative results of neglected tendo-Achilles rupture reconstruction using short flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer: a prospective review. Foot (Edinb). 2012;22:219–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Lee KB, Park YH, Yoon TR, Chung JY. Reconstruction of neglected Achilles tendon rupture using the flexor hallucis tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:316–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Hahn F, Meyer P, Maiwald C, Zanetti M, Vienne P. Treatment of chronic achilles tendinopathy and ruptures with flexor hallucis tendon transfer: clinical outcome and MRI findings. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:794–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Ozer H, Ergisi Y, Harput G, Senol MS, Baltaci G. Short-term results of flexor hallucis longus transfer in delayed and neglected achilles tendon repair. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57:1042–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Koh D, Lim J, Chen JY, Singh IR, Koo K. Flexor hallucis longus transfer versus turndown flaps augmented with flexor hallucis longus transfer in the repair of chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25:221–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Maffulli N, Gougoulias N, Christidis P, Maffulli GD, Oliva F. Primary augmentation of percutaneous repair with flexor hallucis longus tendon for Achilles tendon ruptures reduces tendon elongation and may improve functional outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:94–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Maffulli N, Oliva F, Costa V, Del Buono A. The management of chronic rupture of the Achilles tendon: minimally invasive peroneus brevis tendon transfer. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:353–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Turco VJ, Spinella AJ. Achilles tendon ruptures–peroneus brevis transfer. Foot Ankle. 1987;7:253–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Kosaka T, Yamamoto K. Long-term effects of chronic Achilles tendon rupture treatment, using reconstruction with peroneus brevis transfer, on sports activities. West Indian Med J. 2011;60:628–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Lo Torto F, Kaciulyte J, Marcasciano M, et al. Peroneus Brevis flap in Achilles tendon reconstruction. Clinical, radiological and functional analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26:218–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Carmont MR, Maffulli N. Less invasive Achilles tendon reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Wang CC, Lin LC, Hsu CK, et al. Anatomic reconstruction of neglected Achilles tendon rupture with autogenous peroneal longus tendon by EndoButton fixation. J Trauma. 2009;67:1109–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Alauddin M, Hossain MZ, Rahman MM, et al. Management of neglected rupture of tendoachilles with long gap by Flexor Hallucis longus tendon transfer. Mymensingh Med J. 2022;31:861–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Xu Y, Li C, Liu T, et al. Long-term outcome of flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for chronic Achilles tendon rupture with large defect: A retrospective series. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102: e35302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Miao X, Wu Y, Tao H, Yang D, Huang L. Reconstruction of Kuwada grade IV chronic achilles tendon rupture by minimally invasive technique. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50:523–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Rahm S, Spross C, Gerber F, Farshad M, Buck FM, Espinosa N. Operative treatment of chronic irreparable Achilles tendon ruptures with large flexor hallucis longus tendon transfers. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:1100–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Wapner KL, Pavlock GS, Hecht PJ, Naselli F, Walther R. Repair of chronic Achilles tendon rupture with flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer. Foot Ankle. 1993;14:443–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Adukia V, Akram N, Kamel SA, Gulati A, Davies MB, Mangwani J. Surgical treatment of chronic achilles tendon rupture: An anatomical consideration of various autograft options. J Orthop. 2023;44:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Mahajan RH, Dalal RB. Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for reconstruction of chronically ruptured Achilles tendons. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17:194–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Suttinark P, Suebpongsiri P. Clinical outcomes of flexor hallucis longus transfer for the treatment of Achilles tendinosis rupture. J Med Assoc Thai. 2009;92(Suppl 6):S226–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Yassin M, Gupta V, Martins A, Mahadevan D, Bhatia M. Patient reported outcomes and satisfaction following single incision Flexor Hallucis Longus (FHL) augmentation for chronic Achilles tendon pathologies. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;23: 101650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Jain M, Tripathy SK, Behera S, Das SS, Rana R, Gantaguru A. Functional outcome of gastrocnemius advancement flap augmented with short flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer in chronic Achilles tear. Foot (Edinb). 2020;45: 101704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Coull R, Flavin R, Stephens MM. Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer: evaluation of postoperative morbidity. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24:931–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Apinun J, Jenvorapoj S, Arirachakaran A, Kongtharvonskul J. Clinical outcomes of chronic Achilles tendon rupture treated with flexor hallucis longus grafting and flexor hallucis longus grafting plus additional augmentation: a meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26:717–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Fischer S, Kutscher R, Gramlich Y, Klug A, Hoffmann R, Manegold S. Secondary reconstruction of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: flexor hallucis longus transfer versus plantaris longus augmentation. Int Orthop. 2021;45:2323–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Alhaug OK, Berdal G, Husebye EE, Hvaal K. Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for chronic Achilles tendon rupture. A Retrospect Study Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25:630–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Wegrzyn J, Luciani JF, Philippot R, Brunet-Guedj E, Moyen B, Besse JL. Chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction using a modified flexor hallucis longus transfer. Int Orthop. 2010;34:1187–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Hong CC, Lee WT, Murphy DP, Tan KJ. Anatomic basis for minimally invasive flexor hallucis longus transfer in chronic achilles tendon rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57:938–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Simonson DC, Elliott AD, Roukis TS. Catastrophic failure of an infected achilles tendon rupture repair managed with combined flexor hallucis longus and peroneus brevis tendon transfer. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2016;33:153–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Khalid MA, Weiss WM, Iloanya M, Panchbhavi VK. Dual purpose use of flexor hallucis longus tendon for management of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Spec. 2019;12:345–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Wilcox DK, Bohay DR, Anderson JG. Treatment of chronic achilles tendon disorders with flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer/augmentation. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21:1004–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Maffulli N, Ziello S, Maisto G, Migliorini F, Oliva F. Local tendon transfers for chronic ruptures of the achilles tendon: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12:707.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Cottom JM, Sisovsky CA. Neglected Achilles tendon ruptures. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2021;38:261–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Ahn J, Jeong BO. Return to sports activities after flexor hallucis longus transfer for neglected Achilles tendon rupture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2022;S1067–2516(22):00083–7.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Kraeutler MJ, Purcell JM, Hunt KJ. Chronic Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38:921–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Ahmad J, Jones K, Raikin SM. Treatment of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures with large defects. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016;9:400–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Lui TH, Chan WC, Maffulli N. Endoscopic flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer for chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2016;24:38–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Syed TA, Perera A. Endoscopic management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Clin. 2019;24:459–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Baumfeld D, Baumfeld T, Figueiredo AR, et al. Endoscopic flexor halluces longus transfer for chronic achilles tendon rupture - technique description and early post-operative results. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017;7:341–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Li Y, Jiang Y, Tao T, Pan Z, Zhang K, Gui J. Endoscopic reconstruction for chronic Achilles tendon ruptures using a hamstring tendon autograft. J Orthop Sci. 2021;26:854–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Chen C, Hunt KJ. Open reconstructive strategies for chronic achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Clin. 2019;24:425–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Piontek T, Bąkowski P, Ciemniewska-Gorzela K, Grygorowicz M. Minimally invasive, endoscopic Achilles tendon reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with Endobutton stabilization. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  135. Bussewitz BW. Repair of neglected Achilles rupture. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2017;34:263–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Schweitzer KM Jr, Dekker TJ, Adams SB. Chronic Achilles ruptures: reconstructive options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26:753–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Jiang XJ, Shen JJ, Huang JF, Tong PJ. Reconstruction of Myerson type III chronic Achilles tendon ruptures using semitendinosus tendon and gracilis tendon autograft. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019;27:2309499019832717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Ellison P, Mason LW, Molloy A. Chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstructed using hamstring tendon autograft. Foot (Edinb). 2016;26:41–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Spiezia F, Denaro V. Free hamstrings tendon transfer and interference screw fixation for less invasive reconstruction of chronic avulsions of the Achilles tendon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:269–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Sarzaeem MM, Lemraski MM, Safdari F. Chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstruction using a free semitendinosus tendon graft transfer. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:1386–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Maffulli N, Bartoli A, Sammaria G, Migliorini F, Karlsson J, Oliva F. Free tendon grafts for surgical management of chronic tears of the main body of the Achilles tendon: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:4526–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Maffulli N, Spiezia F, Testa V, Capasso G, Longo UG, Denaro V. Free gracilis tendon graft for reconstruction of chronic tears of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:906–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Maffulli N, Leadbetter WB. Free gracilis tendon graft in neglected tears of the achilles tendon. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15:56–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Maffulli N, Longo UG, Gougoulias N, Denaro V. Ipsilateral free semitendinosus tendon graft transfer for reconstruction of chronic tears of the Achilles tendon. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Maffulli N, Loppini M, Longo UG, Maffulli GD, Denaro V. Minimally invasive reconstruction of chronic achilles tendon ruptures using the ipsilateral free semitendinosus tendon graft and interference screw fixation. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1100–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Spiezia F, Maffulli GD, Longo UG, Denaro V. Less-invasive semitendinosus tendon graft augmentation for the reconstruction of chronic tears of the Achilles tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:865–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Dumbre Patil SS, Dumbre Patil VS, Basa VR, Dombale AB. Semitendinosus tendon autograft for reconstruction of large defects in chronic achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:699–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Maffulli N, Del Buono A, Loppini M, Denaro V. Ipsilateral free semitendinosus tendon graft with interference screw fixation for minimally invasive reconstruction of chronic tears of the Achilles tendon. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014;26:513–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Song YJ, Chen G, Jia SH, Xu WB, Hua YH. Good outcomes at mid-term following the reconstruction of chronic Achilles tendon rupture with semitendinosus allograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:1619–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Nilsson N, Gunnarsson B, Carmont MR, Brorsson A, Karlsson J, Nilsson HK. Endoscopically assisted reconstruction of chronic Achilles tendon ruptures and re-ruptures using a semitendinosus autograft is a viable alternative to pre-existing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:2477–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. El Shazly O, Abou El Soud MM, El Mikkawy DM, El Ganzoury I, Ibrahim AM. Endoscopic-assisted achilles tendon reconstruction with free hamstring tendon autograft for chronic rupture of achilles tendon: clinical and isokinetic evaluation. Arthroscopy. 2014;30:622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Song YJ, Hua YH. Tendon allograft for treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25:252–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Deese JM, Gratto-Cox G, Clements FD, Brown K. Achilles allograft reconstruction for chronic achilles tendinopathy. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2015;24:75–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Nellas ZJ, Loder BG, Wertheimer SJ. Reconstruction of an Achilles tendon defect utilizing an Achilles tendon allograft. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;35:144–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Folsom GJ, Larson CM. Surgical treatment of acute versus chronic complete proximal hamstring ruptures: results of a new allograft technique for chronic reconstructions. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Gross CE, Nunley JA. Treatment of neglected achilles tendon ruptures with interpositional allograft. Foot Ankle Clin. 2017;22:735–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Ofili KP, Pollard JD, Schuberth JM. The neglected Achilles Tendon rupture repaired with allograft: a review of 14 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55:1245–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Hollawell S, Baione W. Chronic Achilles tendon rupture reconstructed with Achilles tendon allograft and xenograft combination. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:1146–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Nordenholm A, Senorski EH, Westin O, et al. Surgical treatment of chronic Achilles tendon rupture results in improved gait biomechanics. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17:67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  160. Korkmaz M, Erkoc MF, Yolcu S, Balbaloglu O, Öztemur Z, Karaaslan F. Weight bearing the same day versus non-weight bearing for 4 weeks in Achilles tendon rupture. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20:513–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Aufwerber S, Heijne A, Edman G, Silbernagel KG, Ackermann PW. Does early functional mobilization affect long-term outcomes after an Achilles tendon rupture? A randomized clinical trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8:2325967120906522.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  162. Us AK, Bilgin SS, Aydin T, Mergen E. Repair of neglected Achilles tendon ruptures: procedures and functional results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116:408–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Arshad Z, Lau EJS, Leow SH, Bhatia M. Management of chronic Achilles ruptures: a scoping review. Int Orthop. 2021;45:2543–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Kim U, Choi YS, Jang GC, Choi YR. Early rehabilitation after open repair for patients with a rupture of the Achilles tendon. Injury. 2017;48:1710–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Schepull T, Aspenberg P. Early controlled tension improves the material properties of healing human achilles tendons after ruptures: a randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2550–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  166. Kangas J, Pajala A, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: a randomized comparison of 2 postoperative regimens. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:59–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Suchak AA, Bostick GP, Beaupré LA, Durand DC, Jomha NM. The influence of early weight-bearing compared with non-weight-bearing after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1876–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  168. Tarantino D, Palermi S, Sirico F, Corrado B. Achilles tendon rupture: mechanisms of injury, principles of rehabilitation and return to play. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020;5:95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. Frane N, Bandovic I, Hu V, Bitterman A. Return-to-Driving Recommendations After Lower-Extremity Orthopaedic Procedures. JBJS Rev. 2020;8:e20.00066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  170. Johns W, Walley KC, Seedat R, Thordarson DB, Jackson B, Gonzalez T. Career outlook and performance of professional athletes after Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review. Foot Ankle Int. 2021;42:495–509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  171. Zellers JA, Carmont MR, Grävare SK. Return to play post-Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1325–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. Usuelli FG, D’Ambrosi R, Manzi L, Indino C, Villafañe JH, Berjano P. Clinical outcomes and return to sports in patients with chronic achilles tendon rupture after minimally invasive reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon graft transfer. Joints. 2017;5:212–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. Maffulli N, Aicale R, Tarantino D. Autograft reconstruction for chronic achilles tendon disorders. Tech Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;16(3):117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Tarantino D, Palermi S, Sirico F, Balato G, D‘Addona A, Corrado B. Achilles tendon pathologies: How to choose the best treatment. J Human Sport Exer. 2020;15:1300–21.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Mansfield K, Dopke K, Koroneos Z, Bonaddio V, Adeyemo A, Aynardi M. Achilles tendon ruptures and repair in athletes-a review of sports-related Achilles injuries and return to play. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15:353–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  176. Caldwell JE, Vosseller JT. Maximizing return to sports after Achilles tendon rupture in athletes. Foot Ankle Clin. 2019;24:439–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Vaidya SR, Sharma SC, Al-Jabri T, Kayani B. Return to sport after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2023;84:1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Top Talents Project of "Six One Project" for High-level Health Talents of Jiangsu Province (LGY2020028); Xuzhou Medical Key Talents Program (XWRCHT20220047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, Sports Medicine Department, Xuzhou Central Hospital, No. 199, the Jiefang South Road, Xuzhou, 221009, Jiangsu, China

    Shi-Ming Feng & Chao Ma

  2. Department of Medicine and Psychology, University “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy

    Nicola Maffulli

  3. Guy Hilton Research Centre, School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University, Stoke-On-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 7QB, England

    Nicola Maffulli

  4. Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital, 275 Bancroft Road, London, E1 4DG, England

    Nicola Maffulli

  5. Department of Sports Traumatology, Universita’ Telematica San Raffaele, Rome, Italy

    Francesco Oliva

  6. Department of Sports Medicine, Sutter-PAMF, Palo Alto, CA, USA

    Amol Saxena

  7. Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Center, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Suzhou Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Yue-Feng Hao

  8. Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

    Ying-Hui Hua

  9. Department of Trauma and Orthopedic, People’s Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Hai-Lin Xu

  10. Department of Sports Medicine, Southwest Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China

    Xu Tao

  11. Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Wei Xu

  12. Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Medical Centre, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Filippo Migliorini

  13. Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 39100, Bolzano, Italy

    Filippo Migliorini

Authors
  1. Shi-Ming Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicola Maffulli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesco Oliva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amol Saxena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yue-Feng Hao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ying-Hui Hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hai-Lin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xu Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wei Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Filippo Migliorini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S-MF conceived the study, supervised data collection, analyzed the data, and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. FO, FM and CM contributed to the analysis and interpretation and collected and summarized the relevant literature. AS, Y-FH, Y-HH, H-LX, XT, and WX helped in data collection, analysis and interpretation, collected and summarized the relevant literature, and helped in drafting the manuscript. NM was involved in the study planning and running and interpretation and analysis of results and reviewed and corrected the various drafts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shi-Ming Feng or Filippo Migliorini.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval has been granted by Xuzhou Central Hospital.

Competing interests

None of the authors has any commercial associations or financial disclosures that might pose or create a conflict of interest with information presented in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, SM., Maffulli, N., Oliva, F. et al. Surgical management of chronic Achilles tendon rupture: evidence-based guidelines. J Orthop Surg Res 19, 132 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04559-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04559-5

Keywords

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

ISSN: 1749-799X