Skip to main content

Table 3 Construct validity: correlations between MHQ and MHQ domains with DASH, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, and Grip strength (N = 262)

From: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ-Sp) in Spain

Instrument

MHQ function

MHQ ADL

MHQ work

MHQ pain

MHQ aesthetics

MHQ satisfaction

MHQ total score

DASH

DASH work

EQ-5D

EQ-VAS

MHQ function

1

          

MHQ ADL

0.66**b

1

         

MHQ work

0.41**

0.46**

1

        

MHQ pain

0.34**

0.36**

0.25**

1

       

MHQ aesthetics

0.37**

0.35**

0.25**

0.32**

1

      

MHQ satisfaction

0.61**

0.56**

0.38**

0.42**

0.37**

1

     

MHQ total scorea

0.77**

0.79**

0.66**

0.61**

0.65**

0.77**

1

    

DASH

− 0.59**

− 0.76**

− 0.51**

− 0.46**

− 0.36**

− 0.52**

− 0.75**§

1

   

DASH work

− 0.48**

− 0.55**

− 0.6**b

− 0.31**

− 0.28**

− 0.39**

− 0.63**

0.63**

1

  

EQ-5D

− 0.05

− 0.03

0.04

0.08

− 0.05

− 0.04

− 0.01c

− 0.05

0.00

1

 

EQ-VAS

− 0.00

0.04

− 0.06

0.00

− 0.05

− 0.00

− 0.02

0.02

0.00

− 0.06

1

Grip

0.04

0.02

0.13*

− 0.04

0.07

− 0.02

0.05c

− 0.06

− 0.04

0.12*

− 0.60**

  1. aSum of all domains divided by 6
  2. bCorrelation is significant for hypothesis test p ≤ 0.05
  3. cCorrelation is not significant for hypothesis test p ≥ 0.05
  4. **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)
  5. *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)